Scusino, cari amici e devoto a la Madonna, ma c'erano alcuni protestanti scrivendo in inglese che ho dovuto rispondere ai suoi attacchi alla Vergine ed alla Chiesa in inglese. Pregano per loro che sono confusi e trattano di confondere.
You are not going to receive the truth of this matter, as your mind is sealed by your idols, so I am not going to strive with you ("the man of Yaweh/God doth not strive") over your religion of choice. You have chosen the idols of Rome, so be it. Therefore, I will not be wasting any more time giving you what the Bible says to show you are yet in your sins, trusting in vanity. Goodbye.
@offline111 You have given up, because your ideas are badly confused by your False Prophets and False Teachers that Jesus warned against, for which reason He founded a Church with Divine Authority to teach promising He would be with it till the end (Matt 28: 18-20)
Ho sentito questo canto numerose volte in chiesa e tutte le volte faceva piangere da come lo cantavano...è un canto meraviglioso invece.questa versione è davvero dolce! Bello,bello,bello! :)
Mary was a sinner who needed a Saviour. She said this herself. Luke 1:47 And my (Mary) spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
God saves only sinners, Christ said that He came to save lost sinners, the lost sheep of Israel. He is the Saviour of the whole world, especially those who believe. All else shall be lost (John 3:18 KJV)
This Roman procession of idols is the practice of hatred toward both God and Mary. The New Testament example rejects them. Mary will condemn you just as God must .
@offline111 You don't know the Bible. She was "highly favored by the most High" and was overshadowed by the Holy Spirit. She said "Behold the slave of the Lord. Let it be done to me according to your word". She also said, inspired by the Spirit, "Behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed". Do you? Do you recognize her as the mother of the Divine Savior, our God, Jesus Christ? She is the mother of the Son of God and our God. You are deceived by your false prophets.
Yehovah (God) has no mother, He is ever present and has no beginning of days. Yehovah came to earth and fashioned a body in the womb of a chosen woman. She gave birth to the body Yehovah/Yahoshua/Jesus indwelled ("in Whom all the fullness of the godhead/being of God dwelled") Mary is not the mother of The Almighty God, she is the mother of the man called Jesus (His earthly body.) Mary was also earthly, carnal, and a sinner ("all have sinned....", and "there is none righteous" Romans 3)
@offline111 I see you are a Judaizer using the Name of Yehovah instead of the Christian name "Father". As you are either a Jew or a Muslim, you have no card in this game. In the Christian scriptures, it clearly says that the Holy Spirit came down upon Mary so she could conceive the Person, not the body, of Jesus. You are indeed Offline insofar as Christianity is concerned.
@FRAGIORGIO1 - What utter nonsense. You don't even know what a Judaizer is. The Biblical definition is one that seeks to take the church of Jesus Christ (which is not Catholicism at all as proven both by the Bible and history) back under The Law Of Moses (being justified by "the works of the Law" rather than the new covenant Law Of Faith given in the New Testament scriptures.) The name Yehovah is Hebrew and is from the original Hebrew text of the Old Testament. The name Jesus comes from Rome.
@offline111 The name "Yehovah" is Hebrew and is never used in the New Testament by Jesus or the other inspired writers. Jesus is the English and Latin form of Yeshua which was the personal name of the Savior. The Greeks would say "Iesous" The Christina name for God was given by Jesus: Father. "Our Father in heaven". You are brutally ignorant of history to deny the existence of the Catholic Church! LOL That is hilarious! Try reading a real book instead of your sect's foolishness.
@offline111 Judaizer: let's see. You call God by the Name the Jews did. You observe Saturday instead of the Sunday, the day of the Resurrection. Before you launch into Witness fidiocies about "Sunday", in Catholic Countries it is called the "Lord's Day": Domenica, Domingo, Dimanche, etc The Greeks say "Kyriake", which means the same. You people don't recognize the Christ as Divine. So, are you Judaizers or Muslims, because the Muslims believe in Jesus as a prophet born of a virgin. So?
@offline111 So you say Jesus was only a body walking around? Your problem is you follow a man from the USA in the 1870 and 1880 who founded a Judaizing sect 1,850 after Jesus founded His one Church and said the gates of hell would not prevail against it, and that He would be with it "all days even to the end of the world". Jesus said there would be false Christs and false prophets. Mr Russell was certainly one of them. Awake!
@FRAGIORGIO1 - Your statement lack a true application. I am not a "Jahovah's Witness", that is a cult that denies the deity of Christ and claims He is Michael The Archangel rather than wholly God (Elohiym in the Hebrew and Yehovah, Who is called "The Father" in the English text of the New Testament.) You will never prove yourself righteous by lying.
@offline111 You say you are not a JW, but you insist on calling God "Yehovah". So you belong to some other tiny sect recently born out of some man's own will. "The Father" is the English version of "Pater" in the Greek of the New Testament. You are the liar if you proclaim JW doctrine and say you are not. But then again, Satan has raised a host of deviant sects who preach a confusion of doctrine and seek to divide the One Fold of Christ.
@FRAGIORGIO1 FRAGIORGIO #753, your confusing the first century primitive church of Christ with the apostate roman catholic sect (i.e., Church of Rome) that would rear its beastly anti-Christos seven sacramental heads of blasphemy some 3 centuries later. You don't know history. Read!
@SpencerBenedict2nd You are ignorant of history and without a clue. St Ignatius of Antioch, a martyr, called the Church "katholike" around 110 AD. St. Irenaeus of Lyons (died 202 AD), disciple of Polycarp martyr, disciple of John Evangelist, said that the true faith is in the church of Rome "founded by the glorious apostles Peter and Paul, with which church all others must be in agreement" (Against Heresies). The martyr Cyprian of Carthage recognizes Rome also in 256 AD.
@FRAGIORGIO1 So if you sincerely believe all this "romish" fabricated nonsense and bunkum, then you are anathema. The Church of Rome is an affront to the church (ecclesia) of Christ.
Rome, the Vatican and everyone involved with it, is anti-Christos and you know it. You lying, deceiving, prevaricating jesuit. Peace be with you.
@FRAGIORGIO1 Let no one deceive you with empty words (2 Peter 2:18), when Ignatius of Antioch writes "Catholic Church" he means just that, the unholy Roman Catholic Church. Ignatius taught the false gospel & false Christ of the Eucharist. The only bread and blood that can save the soul and grant eternal life is the spiritual bread & blood of the real Lord Jesus Christ (John 6:35, 53, 63)
The false claim of the hocus-pocus of Catholic mystical incantations (transubstantiation), will save no one.
@SpencerBenedict2nd You blaspheme Jesus who spoke very clearly in John ch 6 about being the Bread from Heaven and saying that whoever would eat His Body would have everlasting life. You are like those disciples that Abandoned Him saying, "How can this man give us His body to eat?" You ignore His words in the Last Supper, and you Ignore Paul's words in 1st Corinthians 11: 23-29 where he said whoever eats without discerning the body eats judgement to himself ! Beware.
@FRAGIORGIO1 I guess your grade school english teacher didn't teach you about the use of "hyperbole"?
Your claim of the bread and fruit of the vine being the actual flesh and blood of christ is as ridiculous to catholics claiming Christ is made of wood or aluminum and wire mesh.
"Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep." -John 10-7
@FRAGIORGIO1 Let no one deceive you with empty words (2 Peter 2:18), when Irenaeus of Lyons fabricates the one true church in Rome, a listing of the bishops (Popes), and Eucharistic theology, Maryology can also be found in the writing of Irenaeus.
This is garbage. Mary is no "advocata" (advocate) of Eve. The only advocate is Christ, the Lord (1 Timothy 2:5; 1 John 2:1). You are ignorant of biblical history and without a clue.
@FRAGIORGIO1 Let no one deceive you with empty words (2 Peter 2:18), of Cyprian of Carthage.
"You are wont, indeed, to bring up against us the letters of Cyprian, his opinion, his Council; why do ye claim the authority of Cyprian for your schism, and reject his example when it makes for the peace of the Church?" -Augustine, Against the Donatists, Book II, ch. III.
It seems that Cyprian was practiced in Hegelian Dialectic, before there was Hegel. You are ignorant of history and without a clue.
@SpencerBenedict2nd You ought to read Cyprian in his writing "On the Unity of the Catholic Church" wherein he argues for the unity being based on communion with the legitimate successor or Peter at Rome, since there had been a temporary dispute on who was the legitimate successor to Peter as bishop of Rome. Know whereof you speak, Spence! The Donatists were schismatics.
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "..., since there had been a temporary dispute on who was the legitimate successor to Peter as bishop of Rome."
>FYI. There's no such thing as a "legitimate successor" to Peter. Especially as a so-called "Bishop of Rome". With this "doctrine of man" concept you have left the bible and first century Christianity, and delved into forming an apostate hierarchical anti-Christian sect, dimwit.
@offline111 You are a Jehovah's Witness, a religious group founded 1,850 years after Jesus Christ founded His Church and gave it the power of the Holy Spirit. Your group has a history of false prophecies of "the end of the world" every few years. You use Hebrew "Yehovah" which Jesus/Yeshua never did. He only spoke of the "Father". Never in the Christian Scriptures is the name Yehovah used. You do not believe in the Divine Person of Jesus, but in a "man". Deviants.
@FRAGIORGIO1 The false teaching of "the sinless Mary" is blasphemy in the guise of piety. Mary was required by Moses Law to offer sacrifice for the sake of her "purification" after giving birth to a babe named Yahoshua/Jesus, who is The Son Of God. This proves absolutely that Mary was as any woman in regard to giving birth under The Law. Luke 2:22 "And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; "
@offline111 Jesus was also baptized in repentence for sins by John. What does that prove? The angel clearly calls her "kecharitomenou" (very highly gifted) and Elizabeth asks "How is it that the mother of my Lord (the Divine Jesus Christ) should come to me"(Luke 1: 43). Mary also in the Spirit says "Henceforth all generations shall call me blessed" (Luke 1: 43). You use the Scriptures inspired by God that were chosen as so by bishops of the Catholic Church in the first centuries.
@FRAGIORGIO1 - Yahoshua/Jesus was not baptized "for the repentance of sins", He received John's baptimsm, according to the Bible, "to fulfill all righteousness", in other words, to confirm that John was sent by Yehovah ("The Father", Who is Yeshua/Jesus, as Christ Himself taught saying "I and The Father are One", "he that hath seen Me hath seen the Father", "How long have I been with thee, Thomas, yet thou ask show us The Father?")Yeshua"justified" John's ministry by receiving of his baptism.
@offline111 You keep saying Yehovah, although Jesus never uses the name. He has revealed the veiled God of the Old Testament as "Father", "Pater" in the Greek of the New Testament. The righteousness of Jesus is the justification of all sinners at the beginning of His ministry. I note your inconsistencies. You speak of the birth of the "man" Jesus, yet here you recognize He and the Father are both Divine.
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "You use the Scriptures inspired by God that were chosen as so by bishops of the Catholic Church in the first centuries."
FRAGIORGIO, your confusing the first century primitive church of Christ with the apostate roman catholic sect (i.e., Church of Rome) that would rear its beastly anti-Christos seven sacramental heads of blasphemy some 3 centuries later. You don't know history. Read!
@SpencerBenedict2nd This person uses Vulgarity = Not Christian. This person parrots the same phrases with no historical references. The One Church under apostolic authority in Acts of Apostles was the same Church that Jesus promised He would be with to the end of time (Matt 28:18-20). It was the Church of the Martyrs and the Church of the Nicene Council and the same One Universal (katholike) Church today, otherwise you will blaspheme saying He didn't remain with it !!
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "This person uses Vulgarity = Not Christian."
>When did i ever claim i was Christian. I'm an Historian with an affinity for the history of religious sects. You assume too much. This includes your confusion with the writings of so-called early "church fathers", and your lack of ability to distinguish between the primitive christian ecclesia of Christ and the Roman catholic pagan-based sect which eventually "evolved" and branched off away from God and His Son.
@offline111 Mary observed Mosaic Law as did Joseph and just as Jesus did, until He started His preaching in which He gave some exceptions to certain "laws". That proves nothing. The "purification" was simply a question of ritual purity, in case you didn't know. Why did Mary and Joseph present Jesus in the Temple as if the Father did not already accept Him? Think.
@offline111 More inanity and silliness from you. Mary was bound to observe the Mosaic Law as was Jesus. The purification is from the "uncleanness" of childbirth, in case you didn't know, as obviously you did not. And Jesus was baptized by John the Baptizer, although He did not need it, but it was for us. You use the Bible that was given to you by the Catholic Church in the first centuries of Christianity. The present books of the New Testament were decided by Catholic bishops, thank you.
@offline111 This condemnation of "'idols" is the usual foolishness. The statues and pictures that the oldest Christian Churches use, Eastern Orthodox and Catholics, and many Anglicans, is not a belief in the real presence of a divinity therein anymore than that you believe that the photos of your relatives and friends that you keep with great affection actually contain those people. If there are people who actually believe in idols, they are outside orthodox church teaching.
@FRAGIORGIO1 - There was not a single church building built in the entire New Testament, nor in the entire first century. This is the holy example of sacred scripture. The true church of Jesus Christ (Yeshua The Messiah) has no walls, but is spiritual, born of His Spirit, The Spirit Of Christ, The Spirit Of The Father, of Yaweh (The Almighty Elohiym/God.) There were also no images/icons/statues formed by the new covenant churches in that context. Idolatry came with apostasy,over time(from Rome.)
@offline111 My ignorant friend, you have little to no knowledge of the history of the Church. The words for church are Ekklesia "gathering" or Kyriakon "the Lord's (place)". The former refers to all those gathered into the assembly of those sanctified by Christ and in the latter to the building, although the first is used also for the building frequently. From "ekklesia" come the neo-Latin language words "iglesia", "eglise", etc. Kyriakon is the origin of Kirk, Kirche, Church.
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "The former refers to all those gathered into the assembly of those sanctified by Christ and in the latter to the building, although the first is used also for the building frequently."
>My ignorant friend, you have little to no knowledge of the history of the Church. The word church comes from the old English and Germanic word kirke, (pronounced "keer - kay"), and which itself came from the Babylonian for the goddess Circe (pronounced "seer-say"). It's Pagan.
@FRAGIORGIO1 Not building. This is the word from which we get circle, circumference, circumstance, circumvent, etc. The goddess Circe was thought to be connected with the power of the sun, which is round, & thus the connection to Circe, a circle. In anglo-saxon history, the pagans worshipped the sun standing in a kirke, a circle. These pagan worshippers became known as the circle, or the kirke, then ultimately the church. Yes, pagans were called the church B4 Christians were called the church.
@SpencerBenedict2nd You amaze me with your speculative ignorance. "kyriakon" has to do with "kyrios" = Lord in Greek. The Swedish use the word "Kyrka" which is very close to the original. it has nothing to do with a circle or Circe! What you don't know, you make up! As I said, "ekklesia" is the oldest word and most used in Southern Europe anyway, whatever you may speculate, and it is the word the Ekklesia Katholike uses in official use.
@offline111 Mary needed the salvation of Jesus, but it was Preapplied to her so that the Holy One and only Son of the Living God born of her would come from someone who was never under sin's condemnation. So it is that she was saved by Jesus, but not after the fact but before the fact, because the sacrifice of Jesus saved also Abraham, Moses, Elijah, and all the other holy people who had died previously to Jesus coming in the flesh. His salvation is Universal and the effects transcend time.
@FRAGIORGIO1 - The Book Of Hebrews says otherwise. Jesus brought a "better covenant", one that was able to make a man perfect in the eyes of God through the blood of God/Yehovah/Christ being "poured out unto death." This perfect sacrifice was necessary to make a man fully redeemed (spiritually in the present, later in "a better resurrection", redeemed bodily, as Christ has been.) "For by ONE OFFERING He (Christ) hath PERFECTED FOR EVER those who are sanctified."Heb.10:10-14 (please read it)
@offline111 That "one offering" is renewed in every eucharist that the Church celebrates and Jesus' Body and Blood are consumed by the faithful as Jesus urged in John chapter 6 and Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 11: 23-29.
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "That "one offering" is renewed..."
>The Bible says, "But this man (christ) , after he had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down on the right hand of God." Heb 10:12. That is why the verse is never read to roman catholics. This is only one of many verses from the bible catholics will never hear read aloud in their church.
Jesus clearly stated "do this in REMEMBRANCE of me. He never commanded it to become Him.
@SpencerBenedict2nd Stop your Vulgarity, evil spirit! Jesus said "This is My Body, This is My Blood. Take and eat, drink" in all the Gospel texts. If you ever read ch 6 of John you will see Jesus says He is the living Bread from heaven and He will give us His Body to eat so that we may have eternal life. But some followers said, "How can this man give us His body to eat?", and they walked away from Him, as you do. Read Paul in 1 Cor 11:23-29)
@SpencerBenedict2nd St. Paul in 1 Cor 11:23-29 clearly says that whoever eats of the bread unworthily eats to his own condemnation, because he does not recognize the Body. Read and believe for your own salvation !
FRAGIORGIO FARTS, " Read and believe for your own salvation !"
>"For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body."-1 Cor 11:29
"not discerning the Lord's body."- Not distinguishing it, keeping in mind that these are memorials. The Lord's body is His literal body appreciated and discerned by the soul in the faithful receiving, and not present in the elements themselves as we shall see.
1 Cor 11:23-34 The apostle describes the sacred ordinance, of which he had the knowledge by revelation from Christ. As to the visible signs, these are the bread and wine. What is eaten is called bread, though at the same time it is said to be the body of the Lord, plainly showing that the apostle did not mean that the bread was changed into flesh. The things signified by these outward signs, are Christ's body and blood, his body broken, his blood shed.
@offline111 The Church teaches that Jesus saves all, including His holy mother, and He did it by His eternal merits that preceded her birth, just as He saved the patriarchs and prophets of old. His Grace is from age to age. You are sorely misinformed. Jesus fouonded His One Church on Kepha/Peter (the Rock), prayed for unity of believers as One, gave them powers of binding and loosing on earth as in heaven, and promised to be with the Church to the end of time (Matt 28:18-20).
Quando Dio creò l'uomo a sua immagine, a immagine di Dio lo creò: maschio e femmina li creò! (Genesi 1,27).
Dio si è rivelato non solo in Gesù di Nazareth, ma anche in Maria di Nazareth, per me Gesù è il Padre e Maria la madre Celeste, chi non si riconosce in questa verità biblica non conosce Dio, maschio e femmina, padre e madre, noi credenti siamo i figli di Dio, ma stiamo attenti all'idolatria, che è la causa di ogni male.
@GIAVINCE mio DIO, mio DIO, come sei informato male: leggi la SACRA SCRITTURA E LEGGI IL VANGELO, COMINCIANDO CON QUELLO DI GIOVANNI, E CAPIRAI, CHE: DIO ONNIPOTENTE E`PADRE ,MADRE; FRATELLO SORELLA E AMICO e TUTTO PERCHE LUI E`: LIO SONO: L`ONNIPOTENTE; RITORNATE A CASA DAL VERo E UNICO DIO.
@GIAVINCE Sbagli, fratello. Maria `e una creatura, vassello dello Spirito Santo che la fece madre del Divino Figlio di Dio, Gesu' Cristo. C'`e Dio Padre, Dio Figlio in Gesu' Cristo e Dio Spirito Santo che unisce Padre e Figlio come in una relazione maternale, non di confondersi con la stessa condizione meramente umana. Maria `e uno strumento della volonta' del Padre e dell'azione dello Spirito Santo che le conferisce la Divina Maternita' ma non la diviniza.
@GIAVINCE Ricordati che in Genesi si parla di Adamo ed Eva che peccarono, prima Eva e poi Adamo, ma la colpa di Adamo passa a tutti noi altri umani. Cosi' anche, Maria `e la nuova Eva che piuttosto accetta la volonta' di Dio "Ecco la schiava del Signore; sia fatta in me secondo la tua parola" (Luca 1: 38) e Gesu' `e il secondo Adamo che accetta la volonta' del Padre nel Getsemani (Luca 22: 42) e la Sua obbedienza ci libera dalla colpa agli umani (se accettiamo a Gesu').
@GIAVINCE Iddio ha servito della Vergine creatura obbediente e santa come mezzo per il Suo Proprio Figlio Prediletto e Divino, Gesucristo. C'`e una buona differenza
@SpencerBenedict2nd You are not biblical. She was chosen by the Father, and Gabriel said, "Hail very blessed, the Lord is with you"!! And you deny? Do you think the Son of God would have spent nine months in the womb of a sinner??? Then the Holy Spirit overshadowed her. Could she be not holy, blasphemer? And she became the mother of Jesus Christ, Son of God. You are Wrong!. Mary responds to Elizabeth's greeting, "Henceforth all generations shall call be blessed". Think
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>No she could not.
"Who will not fear, O Lord, and glorify Your name? For You alone are holy; For ALL THE NATIONS WILL COME AND WORSHIP BEFORE YOU, FOR YOUR RIGHTEOUS ACTS HAVE BEEN REVEALED."-Revelation 15:4
>Do you possess the intelligence required to understand what, "ALONE" means? The title of holiness only belongs to Christ. Your still having revelations, even at your age! LOL.
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>No she could not, blasphemer. Or maybe your just ignorant. This, i do not know if i can fix, but i'll sure try. So please, pay attention and not contention.
The bible affirms God is our only model and source of holiness! Isaiah 6:3, Psalm 99:3,5,9, Rev 15:4 and many more scriptures.
The words "holy" and "holiness" are used over 600 times in the bible. Not once does either word ever refer to Mary.
@GIAVINCE Caro Amico, sei sbagliato. Dio `e Tre in Uno: Padre, Figlio e Spirito Santo. Maria fu scelta per il Padre per essere madre del Figlio Divino Suo e lo Spirito Santo diede alla Vergine, creatura di Dio, il potere di ricevere la maternita' divina che non poteva avere per si stessa. Questa `e la dottrina dell Chiesa Cattolica. Maria `e madre del Divino Salvatore, Dio e uomo di nature, ma Una Sola Persona Divina, e percio' lei `e Madre di Dio Figlio unicamente.
@GIAVINCE Si puo' dire che Maria `e la nuova Eva come Gesu' `e il nuovo Adamo. Lei disse "Si'" al messaggio dell'angelo per la volonta' del Padre. "Sia fatto a me secondo la sua volonta'" disse la vergine in contraste con la disubbedienza di Eva. Gesu' disse "Si'" al Padre nell'orto di Getsemani.
Certo la Vergine Santa ha certamente cura dei suoi figli,ma a ricordarcelo e a rivolgerle almeno un saluto ,è lei ,col suo meraviglioso video: grazie! La Madonna ci tenga sempre vicini.
e sempre bellissimo ma diverso da come lo ricordavo
cartamariabonaria 3 weeks ago
Grazie della spiegazione e che Dio ci benedica sempre: pace e bene.
GIAVINCE 1 month ago
Scusino, cari amici e devoto a la Madonna, ma c'erano alcuni protestanti scrivendo in inglese che ho dovuto rispondere ai suoi attacchi alla Vergine ed alla Chiesa in inglese. Pregano per loro che sono confusi e trattano di confondere.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
You are not going to receive the truth of this matter, as your mind is sealed by your idols, so I am not going to strive with you ("the man of Yaweh/God doth not strive") over your religion of choice. You have chosen the idols of Rome, so be it. Therefore, I will not be wasting any more time giving you what the Bible says to show you are yet in your sins, trusting in vanity. Goodbye.
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 You have given up, because your ideas are badly confused by your False Prophets and False Teachers that Jesus warned against, for which reason He founded a Church with Divine Authority to teach promising He would be with it till the end (Matt 28: 18-20)
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
SE POCO FA MI DICEVI CHE NEL SENTIRE UNA LODE SI POTEVA PIANGERE, TI DICEVO SEI PAZZO..
ADESSO NO... LA MADONNA MI HA SALVATO QUANDO AVEVO MESI, SALVATO DA MORTE CERTA, ADESSO DOPO 57 ANNI E' TORNATA E MI FA PIANGERE GRAZIE MARIA
giacomino16 7 months ago
qual'è la musica che si sente alla fine del vieo?? vi pregooooooooo ditemelo :-(
dj88live 1 year ago
possa la Vergine colmare di bontà e amore qui cuori che inneggiano alla cattiveria e non all'amore...
cleope79 2 years ago
Ho sentito questo canto numerose volte in chiesa e tutte le volte faceva piangere da come lo cantavano...è un canto meraviglioso invece.questa versione è davvero dolce! Bello,bello,bello! :)
eudemonologo 2 years ago 8
la musica finale é troppo bella!!!!!sai dirmi dove la posso prendere????:):)
alexius00 2 years ago
Comment removed
nanoday86 2 years ago
@nanoday86
xD hauahauah anche io l'ho pensato!
LetMeBeFreee 1 year ago
Oh Maria concebida sem pecado, rogai por nós, que recorremos a Vós.
RomydeJesus 2 years ago
Mary was a sinner who needed a Saviour. She said this herself. Luke 1:47 And my (Mary) spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.
God saves only sinners, Christ said that He came to save lost sinners, the lost sheep of Israel. He is the Saviour of the whole world, especially those who believe. All else shall be lost (John 3:18 KJV)
This Roman procession of idols is the practice of hatred toward both God and Mary. The New Testament example rejects them. Mary will condemn you just as God must .
offline111 2 years ago
@offline111 You don't know the Bible. She was "highly favored by the most High" and was overshadowed by the Holy Spirit. She said "Behold the slave of the Lord. Let it be done to me according to your word". She also said, inspired by the Spirit, "Behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed". Do you? Do you recognize her as the mother of the Divine Savior, our God, Jesus Christ? She is the mother of the Son of God and our God. You are deceived by your false prophets.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
Yehovah (God) has no mother, He is ever present and has no beginning of days. Yehovah came to earth and fashioned a body in the womb of a chosen woman. She gave birth to the body Yehovah/Yahoshua/Jesus indwelled ("in Whom all the fullness of the godhead/being of God dwelled") Mary is not the mother of The Almighty God, she is the mother of the man called Jesus (His earthly body.) Mary was also earthly, carnal, and a sinner ("all have sinned....", and "there is none righteous" Romans 3)
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 I see you are a Judaizer using the Name of Yehovah instead of the Christian name "Father". As you are either a Jew or a Muslim, you have no card in this game. In the Christian scriptures, it clearly says that the Holy Spirit came down upon Mary so she could conceive the Person, not the body, of Jesus. You are indeed Offline insofar as Christianity is concerned.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 - What utter nonsense. You don't even know what a Judaizer is. The Biblical definition is one that seeks to take the church of Jesus Christ (which is not Catholicism at all as proven both by the Bible and history) back under The Law Of Moses (being justified by "the works of the Law" rather than the new covenant Law Of Faith given in the New Testament scriptures.) The name Yehovah is Hebrew and is from the original Hebrew text of the Old Testament. The name Jesus comes from Rome.
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 The name "Yehovah" is Hebrew and is never used in the New Testament by Jesus or the other inspired writers. Jesus is the English and Latin form of Yeshua which was the personal name of the Savior. The Greeks would say "Iesous" The Christina name for God was given by Jesus: Father. "Our Father in heaven". You are brutally ignorant of history to deny the existence of the Catholic Church! LOL That is hilarious! Try reading a real book instead of your sect's foolishness.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@offline111 Judaizer: let's see. You call God by the Name the Jews did. You observe Saturday instead of the Sunday, the day of the Resurrection. Before you launch into Witness fidiocies about "Sunday", in Catholic Countries it is called the "Lord's Day": Domenica, Domingo, Dimanche, etc The Greeks say "Kyriake", which means the same. You people don't recognize the Christ as Divine. So, are you Judaizers or Muslims, because the Muslims believe in Jesus as a prophet born of a virgin. So?
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@offline111 So you say Jesus was only a body walking around? Your problem is you follow a man from the USA in the 1870 and 1880 who founded a Judaizing sect 1,850 after Jesus founded His one Church and said the gates of hell would not prevail against it, and that He would be with it "all days even to the end of the world". Jesus said there would be false Christs and false prophets. Mr Russell was certainly one of them. Awake!
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 - Your statement lack a true application. I am not a "Jahovah's Witness", that is a cult that denies the deity of Christ and claims He is Michael The Archangel rather than wholly God (Elohiym in the Hebrew and Yehovah, Who is called "The Father" in the English text of the New Testament.) You will never prove yourself righteous by lying.
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 You say you are not a JW, but you insist on calling God "Yehovah". So you belong to some other tiny sect recently born out of some man's own will. "The Father" is the English version of "Pater" in the Greek of the New Testament. You are the liar if you proclaim JW doctrine and say you are not. But then again, Satan has raised a host of deviant sects who preach a confusion of doctrine and seek to divide the One Fold of Christ.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 FRAGIORGIO #753, your confusing the first century primitive church of Christ with the apostate roman catholic sect (i.e., Church of Rome) that would rear its beastly anti-Christos seven sacramental heads of blasphemy some 3 centuries later. You don't know history. Read!
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd You are ignorant of history and without a clue. St Ignatius of Antioch, a martyr, called the Church "katholike" around 110 AD. St. Irenaeus of Lyons (died 202 AD), disciple of Polycarp martyr, disciple of John Evangelist, said that the true faith is in the church of Rome "founded by the glorious apostles Peter and Paul, with which church all others must be in agreement" (Against Heresies). The martyr Cyprian of Carthage recognizes Rome also in 256 AD.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 So if you sincerely believe all this "romish" fabricated nonsense and bunkum, then you are anathema. The Church of Rome is an affront to the church (ecclesia) of Christ.
Rome, the Vatican and everyone involved with it, is anti-Christos and you know it. You lying, deceiving, prevaricating jesuit. Peace be with you.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 Let no one deceive you with empty words (2 Peter 2:18), when Ignatius of Antioch writes "Catholic Church" he means just that, the unholy Roman Catholic Church. Ignatius taught the false gospel & false Christ of the Eucharist. The only bread and blood that can save the soul and grant eternal life is the spiritual bread & blood of the real Lord Jesus Christ (John 6:35, 53, 63)
The false claim of the hocus-pocus of Catholic mystical incantations (transubstantiation), will save no one.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd You blaspheme Jesus who spoke very clearly in John ch 6 about being the Bread from Heaven and saying that whoever would eat His Body would have everlasting life. You are like those disciples that Abandoned Him saying, "How can this man give us His body to eat?" You ignore His words in the Last Supper, and you Ignore Paul's words in 1st Corinthians 11: 23-29 where he said whoever eats without discerning the body eats judgement to himself ! Beware.
FRAGIORGIO1 4 days ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 I guess your grade school english teacher didn't teach you about the use of "hyperbole"?
Your claim of the bread and fruit of the vine being the actual flesh and blood of christ is as ridiculous to catholics claiming Christ is made of wood or aluminum and wire mesh.
"Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep." -John 10-7
Beware! LOL, fairy-tale idiot.
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 days ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 Let no one deceive you with empty words (2 Peter 2:18), when Irenaeus of Lyons fabricates the one true church in Rome, a listing of the bishops (Popes), and Eucharistic theology, Maryology can also be found in the writing of Irenaeus.
This is garbage. Mary is no "advocata" (advocate) of Eve. The only advocate is Christ, the Lord (1 Timothy 2:5; 1 John 2:1). You are ignorant of biblical history and without a clue.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 Let no one deceive you with empty words (2 Peter 2:18), of Cyprian of Carthage.
"You are wont, indeed, to bring up against us the letters of Cyprian, his opinion, his Council; why do ye claim the authority of Cyprian for your schism, and reject his example when it makes for the peace of the Church?" -Augustine, Against the Donatists, Book II, ch. III.
It seems that Cyprian was practiced in Hegelian Dialectic, before there was Hegel. You are ignorant of history and without a clue.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd You ought to read Cyprian in his writing "On the Unity of the Catholic Church" wherein he argues for the unity being based on communion with the legitimate successor or Peter at Rome, since there had been a temporary dispute on who was the legitimate successor to Peter as bishop of Rome. Know whereof you speak, Spence! The Donatists were schismatics.
FRAGIORGIO1 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "..., since there had been a temporary dispute on who was the legitimate successor to Peter as bishop of Rome."
>FYI. There's no such thing as a "legitimate successor" to Peter. Especially as a so-called "Bishop of Rome". With this "doctrine of man" concept you have left the bible and first century Christianity, and delved into forming an apostate hierarchical anti-Christian sect, dimwit.
SpencerBenedict2nd 4 days ago
@offline111 You are a Jehovah's Witness, a religious group founded 1,850 years after Jesus Christ founded His Church and gave it the power of the Holy Spirit. Your group has a history of false prophecies of "the end of the world" every few years. You use Hebrew "Yehovah" which Jesus/Yeshua never did. He only spoke of the "Father". Never in the Christian Scriptures is the name Yehovah used. You do not believe in the Divine Person of Jesus, but in a "man". Deviants.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 The false teaching of "the sinless Mary" is blasphemy in the guise of piety. Mary was required by Moses Law to offer sacrifice for the sake of her "purification" after giving birth to a babe named Yahoshua/Jesus, who is The Son Of God. This proves absolutely that Mary was as any woman in regard to giving birth under The Law. Luke 2:22 "And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; "
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 Jesus was also baptized in repentence for sins by John. What does that prove? The angel clearly calls her "kecharitomenou" (very highly gifted) and Elizabeth asks "How is it that the mother of my Lord (the Divine Jesus Christ) should come to me"(Luke 1: 43). Mary also in the Spirit says "Henceforth all generations shall call me blessed" (Luke 1: 43). You use the Scriptures inspired by God that were chosen as so by bishops of the Catholic Church in the first centuries.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 - Yahoshua/Jesus was not baptized "for the repentance of sins", He received John's baptimsm, according to the Bible, "to fulfill all righteousness", in other words, to confirm that John was sent by Yehovah ("The Father", Who is Yeshua/Jesus, as Christ Himself taught saying "I and The Father are One", "he that hath seen Me hath seen the Father", "How long have I been with thee, Thomas, yet thou ask show us The Father?")Yeshua"justified" John's ministry by receiving of his baptism.
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 You keep saying Yehovah, although Jesus never uses the name. He has revealed the veiled God of the Old Testament as "Father", "Pater" in the Greek of the New Testament. The righteousness of Jesus is the justification of all sinners at the beginning of His ministry. I note your inconsistencies. You speak of the birth of the "man" Jesus, yet here you recognize He and the Father are both Divine.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "You use the Scriptures inspired by God that were chosen as so by bishops of the Catholic Church in the first centuries."
FRAGIORGIO, your confusing the first century primitive church of Christ with the apostate roman catholic sect (i.e., Church of Rome) that would rear its beastly anti-Christos seven sacramental heads of blasphemy some 3 centuries later. You don't know history. Read!
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd This person uses Vulgarity = Not Christian. This person parrots the same phrases with no historical references. The One Church under apostolic authority in Acts of Apostles was the same Church that Jesus promised He would be with to the end of time (Matt 28:18-20). It was the Church of the Martyrs and the Church of the Nicene Council and the same One Universal (katholike) Church today, otherwise you will blaspheme saying He didn't remain with it !!
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "This person uses Vulgarity = Not Christian."
>When did i ever claim i was Christian. I'm an Historian with an affinity for the history of religious sects. You assume too much. This includes your confusion with the writings of so-called early "church fathers", and your lack of ability to distinguish between the primitive christian ecclesia of Christ and the Roman catholic pagan-based sect which eventually "evolved" and branched off away from God and His Son.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@offline111 Mary observed Mosaic Law as did Joseph and just as Jesus did, until He started His preaching in which He gave some exceptions to certain "laws". That proves nothing. The "purification" was simply a question of ritual purity, in case you didn't know. Why did Mary and Joseph present Jesus in the Temple as if the Father did not already accept Him? Think.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@offline111 More inanity and silliness from you. Mary was bound to observe the Mosaic Law as was Jesus. The purification is from the "uncleanness" of childbirth, in case you didn't know, as obviously you did not. And Jesus was baptized by John the Baptizer, although He did not need it, but it was for us. You use the Bible that was given to you by the Catholic Church in the first centuries of Christianity. The present books of the New Testament were decided by Catholic bishops, thank you.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@offline111 This condemnation of "'idols" is the usual foolishness. The statues and pictures that the oldest Christian Churches use, Eastern Orthodox and Catholics, and many Anglicans, is not a belief in the real presence of a divinity therein anymore than that you believe that the photos of your relatives and friends that you keep with great affection actually contain those people. If there are people who actually believe in idols, they are outside orthodox church teaching.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 - There was not a single church building built in the entire New Testament, nor in the entire first century. This is the holy example of sacred scripture. The true church of Jesus Christ (Yeshua The Messiah) has no walls, but is spiritual, born of His Spirit, The Spirit Of Christ, The Spirit Of The Father, of Yaweh (The Almighty Elohiym/God.) There were also no images/icons/statues formed by the new covenant churches in that context. Idolatry came with apostasy,over time(from Rome.)
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 My ignorant friend, you have little to no knowledge of the history of the Church. The words for church are Ekklesia "gathering" or Kyriakon "the Lord's (place)". The former refers to all those gathered into the assembly of those sanctified by Christ and in the latter to the building, although the first is used also for the building frequently. From "ekklesia" come the neo-Latin language words "iglesia", "eglise", etc. Kyriakon is the origin of Kirk, Kirche, Church.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "The former refers to all those gathered into the assembly of those sanctified by Christ and in the latter to the building, although the first is used also for the building frequently."
>My ignorant friend, you have little to no knowledge of the history of the Church. The word church comes from the old English and Germanic word kirke, (pronounced "keer - kay"), and which itself came from the Babylonian for the goddess Circe (pronounced "seer-say"). It's Pagan.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 Not building. This is the word from which we get circle, circumference, circumstance, circumvent, etc. The goddess Circe was thought to be connected with the power of the sun, which is round, & thus the connection to Circe, a circle. In anglo-saxon history, the pagans worshipped the sun standing in a kirke, a circle. These pagan worshippers became known as the circle, or the kirke, then ultimately the church. Yes, pagans were called the church B4 Christians were called the church.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd You amaze me with your speculative ignorance. "kyriakon" has to do with "kyrios" = Lord in Greek. The Swedish use the word "Kyrka" which is very close to the original. it has nothing to do with a circle or Circe! What you don't know, you make up! As I said, "ekklesia" is the oldest word and most used in Southern Europe anyway, whatever you may speculate, and it is the word the Ekklesia Katholike uses in official use.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 You amaze me with your ignorance.
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, ""kyriakon" has to do with "kyrios" = Lord in Greek. The Swedish use the word "Kyrka" which is very close to the original."
>It's not "very close to the original", nor is it even close, silly. They are completely different words with no relation.
FRAGIORIORGIO1 FARTS, "...and it is the word the Ekklesia Katholike..."
>And you accuse me of making stuff up?! LOL, that's rich.
I'm curious, do you find anyone takes you seriously?
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@offline111 Mary needed the salvation of Jesus, but it was Preapplied to her so that the Holy One and only Son of the Living God born of her would come from someone who was never under sin's condemnation. So it is that she was saved by Jesus, but not after the fact but before the fact, because the sacrifice of Jesus saved also Abraham, Moses, Elijah, and all the other holy people who had died previously to Jesus coming in the flesh. His salvation is Universal and the effects transcend time.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 - The Book Of Hebrews says otherwise. Jesus brought a "better covenant", one that was able to make a man perfect in the eyes of God through the blood of God/Yehovah/Christ being "poured out unto death." This perfect sacrifice was necessary to make a man fully redeemed (spiritually in the present, later in "a better resurrection", redeemed bodily, as Christ has been.) "For by ONE OFFERING He (Christ) hath PERFECTED FOR EVER those who are sanctified."Heb.10:10-14 (please read it)
offline111 7 months ago
@offline111 That "one offering" is renewed in every eucharist that the Church celebrates and Jesus' Body and Blood are consumed by the faithful as Jesus urged in John chapter 6 and Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 11: 23-29.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "That "one offering" is renewed..."
>The Bible says, "But this man (christ) , after he had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down on the right hand of God." Heb 10:12. That is why the verse is never read to roman catholics. This is only one of many verses from the bible catholics will never hear read aloud in their church.
Jesus clearly stated "do this in REMEMBRANCE of me. He never commanded it to become Him.
-see Luke 22:19 & 1 Cor 11:24-25
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd Stop your Vulgarity, evil spirit! Jesus said "This is My Body, This is My Blood. Take and eat, drink" in all the Gospel texts. If you ever read ch 6 of John you will see Jesus says He is the living Bread from heaven and He will give us His Body to eat so that we may have eternal life. But some followers said, "How can this man give us His body to eat?", and they walked away from Him, as you do. Read Paul in 1 Cor 11:23-29)
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS "If you ever read ch 6 of John you will see Jesus says He is the living Bread from heaven and He will give us His Body to eat"
>YouTube community, let's allow God's Word to put his delusion in perspective
"I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture"-Jn 10-9
"Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep"
So, is he made of wood or aluminum & wire mesh? LOL
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd St. Paul in 1 Cor 11:23-29 clearly says that whoever eats of the bread unworthily eats to his own condemnation, because he does not recognize the Body. Read and believe for your own salvation !
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 PART ONE
FRAGIORGIO FARTS, " Read and believe for your own salvation !"
>"For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body."-1 Cor 11:29
"not discerning the Lord's body."- Not distinguishing it, keeping in mind that these are memorials. The Lord's body is His literal body appreciated and discerned by the soul in the faithful receiving, and not present in the elements themselves as we shall see.
CONTINUED
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 PART TWO
1 Cor 11:23-34 The apostle describes the sacred ordinance, of which he had the knowledge by revelation from Christ. As to the visible signs, these are the bread and wine. What is eaten is called bread, though at the same time it is said to be the body of the Lord, plainly showing that the apostle did not mean that the bread was changed into flesh. The things signified by these outward signs, are Christ's body and blood, his body broken, his blood shed.
Read and believe!
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@offline111 The Church teaches that Jesus saves all, including His holy mother, and He did it by His eternal merits that preceded her birth, just as He saved the patriarchs and prophets of old. His Grace is from age to age. You are sorely misinformed. Jesus fouonded His One Church on Kepha/Peter (the Rock), prayed for unity of believers as One, gave them powers of binding and loosing on earth as in heaven, and promised to be with the Church to the end of time (Matt 28:18-20).
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
Quando Dio creò l'uomo a sua immagine, a immagine di Dio lo creò: maschio e femmina li creò! (Genesi 1,27).
Dio si è rivelato non solo in Gesù di Nazareth, ma anche in Maria di Nazareth, per me Gesù è il Padre e Maria la madre Celeste, chi non si riconosce in questa verità biblica non conosce Dio, maschio e femmina, padre e madre, noi credenti siamo i figli di Dio, ma stiamo attenti all'idolatria, che è la causa di ogni male.
GIAVINCE 2 years ago
@GIAVINCE mio DIO, mio DIO, come sei informato male: leggi la SACRA SCRITTURA E LEGGI IL VANGELO, COMINCIANDO CON QUELLO DI GIOVANNI, E CAPIRAI, CHE: DIO ONNIPOTENTE E`PADRE ,MADRE; FRATELLO SORELLA E AMICO e TUTTO PERCHE LUI E`: LIO SONO: L`ONNIPOTENTE; RITORNATE A CASA DAL VERo E UNICO DIO.
conosciuto1 1 year ago
@GIAVINCE Sbagli, fratello. Maria `e una creatura, vassello dello Spirito Santo che la fece madre del Divino Figlio di Dio, Gesu' Cristo. C'`e Dio Padre, Dio Figlio in Gesu' Cristo e Dio Spirito Santo che unisce Padre e Figlio come in una relazione maternale, non di confondersi con la stessa condizione meramente umana. Maria `e uno strumento della volonta' del Padre e dell'azione dello Spirito Santo che le conferisce la Divina Maternita' ma non la diviniza.
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@GIAVINCE Ricordati che in Genesi si parla di Adamo ed Eva che peccarono, prima Eva e poi Adamo, ma la colpa di Adamo passa a tutti noi altri umani. Cosi' anche, Maria `e la nuova Eva che piuttosto accetta la volonta' di Dio "Ecco la schiava del Signore; sia fatta in me secondo la tua parola" (Luca 1: 38) e Gesu' `e il secondo Adamo che accetta la volonta' del Padre nel Getsemani (Luca 22: 42) e la Sua obbedienza ci libera dalla colpa agli umani (se accettiamo a Gesu').
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@GIAVINCE Iddio ha servito della Vergine creatura obbediente e santa come mezzo per il Suo Proprio Figlio Prediletto e Divino, Gesucristo. C'`e una buona differenza
FRAGIORGIO1 7 months ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 The virgin Mary was not "holy". Sorry.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@SpencerBenedict2nd You are not biblical. She was chosen by the Father, and Gabriel said, "Hail very blessed, the Lord is with you"!! And you deny? Do you think the Son of God would have spent nine months in the womb of a sinner??? Then the Holy Spirit overshadowed her. Could she be not holy, blasphemer? And she became the mother of Jesus Christ, Son of God. You are Wrong!. Mary responds to Elizabeth's greeting, "Henceforth all generations shall call be blessed". Think
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1 You are not biblical, rational, logical, or intelligent. The meanings of the words, "blessed" and "holy" are not one in the same.
FRAGIOIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>You must remember, it is not i, who you are taking on. It's universal truth. I'm just supplying it, so take it up with God.
The bible affirms God is our ONLY model and source of holiness! Isaiah 6:3, Psalm 99:3,5,9, Rev 15:4 and many more scriptures.
Not once does "holy" ever refer to Mary.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>No. No she could not. But please, don't take my word for it. Take up your argument with God, blasphemer.
"And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory."-Isaiah 6:3
God is in Himself the Holy One (kâdōsh), i.e., the separate One, beyond or above the world, true light, spotless purity, the perfect One.
Mary was not holy. Blessed yes. But not holy.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>No. No she could not.
"They shall confess your great and awesome Name, for it is holy!"-Psalm 99:3
"Exalt ye the LORD our God, and worship at his footstool; for he is holy."-Psalm 99:5
"Exalt the LORD our God, and worship at his holy hill; for the LORD our God is holy."-Psalm 99:9
Mary was not, and is not "holy". Blessed, yes. But not holy, as god himself will attest in the next Scripture i share, blasphemer.
CONTINUED
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>No she could not.
"Who will not fear, O Lord, and glorify Your name? For You alone are holy; For ALL THE NATIONS WILL COME AND WORSHIP BEFORE YOU, FOR YOUR RIGHTEOUS ACTS HAVE BEEN REVEALED."-Revelation 15:4
>Do you possess the intelligence required to understand what, "ALONE" means? The title of holiness only belongs to Christ. Your still having revelations, even at your age! LOL.
Who's the "blasphemer" now? Dumb ass.
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
FRAGIORGIO1 FARTS, "Could she be not holy, blasphemer?"
>No she could not, blasphemer. Or maybe your just ignorant. This, i do not know if i can fix, but i'll sure try. So please, pay attention and not contention.
The bible affirms God is our only model and source of holiness! Isaiah 6:3, Psalm 99:3,5,9, Rev 15:4 and many more scriptures.
The words "holy" and "holiness" are used over 600 times in the bible. Not once does either word ever refer to Mary.
¿Comprende?, catholic?
SpencerBenedict2nd 1 month ago
@GIAVINCE Caro Amico, sei sbagliato. Dio `e Tre in Uno: Padre, Figlio e Spirito Santo. Maria fu scelta per il Padre per essere madre del Figlio Divino Suo e lo Spirito Santo diede alla Vergine, creatura di Dio, il potere di ricevere la maternita' divina che non poteva avere per si stessa. Questa `e la dottrina dell Chiesa Cattolica. Maria `e madre del Divino Salvatore, Dio e uomo di nature, ma Una Sola Persona Divina, e percio' lei `e Madre di Dio Figlio unicamente.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
@GIAVINCE Si puo' dire che Maria `e la nuova Eva come Gesu' `e il nuovo Adamo. Lei disse "Si'" al messaggio dell'angelo per la volonta' del Padre. "Sia fatto a me secondo la sua volonta'" disse la vergine in contraste con la disubbedienza di Eva. Gesu' disse "Si'" al Padre nell'orto di Getsemani.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 month ago
The church that keeps it's focus on 'the woman' (MARY {not the true Mary of the Bible]
Not the Virgin Mary, not the Saints, but Jesus ...
watchman077 2 years ago
Certo la Vergine Santa ha certamente cura dei suoi figli,ma a ricordarcelo e a rivolgerle almeno un saluto ,è lei ,col suo meraviglioso video: grazie! La Madonna ci tenga sempre vicini.
famcaspia 2 years ago 3