The Difference Between Evolutionary Theory And Evolution

[louraceprep]

gravity is a scientific law not a theory that means that it is a constant

[UZIELROMERO]

ok first of all this dudes fat i mean he runs out of breath while hes talking and standing and second this kid doesnt deserve to wear a jordan shirt.

[gregrutz]

Very good job.

[Chuichupachichi]

I'll bet there are people whom are extremely proud of you being so scientifically literate at such a young age.

Too bad that subscribing to things that are false, such as evolution, makes minds dumb. Guess how it came about that that one scientist in the whale evolution video, ended up having a mind that calls 4 legged, dog-like creatures a "whale"? Plenty of years of subscribing to false evo, thats how.

If you continue to hate your Creator you can count on your intellectual "devolution".

[ark5089]

Off topic, but you sound like someone is holding a gun to your head off camera.

[classyguy426]

i agree blink in Morse code if you need help...

[200407013]

nicely donce

[halohms]

Great job. You will get better in your productions with experience. I wish I could do it.

[keedaman]

good job although it would have been better if you had given a short description of natural selection, gamete mutation, gene flow and drift.

[Kujien]

Thanks a lot. I plan on going further into the topics.

[SaviorOfLogic]

I think you should have specefied that this is concerning the idea of (some) creationists saying it's 'just a theory' and the confused mess some evolutionists get into while trying to refute this.

[NotSoOldHippy]

Oh man, no matter how many times one tries to explain the _directly_observed_fact_ of evolution and the _theories_ which describe them to Creationists, it's a pointless effort. Cultists just don't care to learn science which they stupidly, unthinkingly believe some how detract from their gods.

[Chuichupachichi]

Just curious, how many hits of acid does one need to drop in order to hallucinate that you have 4 hands and are really an ape? I'd imagine it takes a few more hits to hallucinate 4 legged whales and Amoebian progenitors of the human race....... with colorful tracers!

(they stupidly, unthinkingly believe some how detract from their god)

"From the beginning, they were created man & woman" - Jesus

How much stupid unthinking belief & hallucinations does it require for evo to not detract from God?

[NotSoOldHippy]

"Just curious, how many hits of acid does one need to drop in order to hallucinate that you have 4 hands and are really an ape?"

Cultists aren't on illegal narcotics, they're doped up on occult superstition which is far more debilitative than any chemical drug.

[Chuichupachichi]

You can say that again! Scientists say that humans use only 10% of our brains. But I know that I was less intelligent years ago when before I used my chemicals. It seems that they have stimulated some of that other 90% to kick on

However, those chemicals that make you

psycholo-psychedelicatessen are not exactly "smart pills". I mean they might cause you to be groovy and all, but when you're pointing at the purple monster with pink polka dots & green hair and telling everyone to check out what

[Chuichupachichi]

none of them see. That doesn't exactly put you in the "brilliant" category. Instead, it might put you on Denvers 6 o'clock news, talking into the camera about how you're going to make a building fly and make money rain down from the sky. All just to end the DNC in grand fashion with a gala extraveganza

"occult"? Wanting to make buildings fly off the ground, I figured was deli bologna people in amateur Dracula costumes trying to make "as it is below, so it is above". Backwards would be fitting

[Chuichupachichi]

of Democrats. I mean, they brought socialism to America didn't they? How can you say cultists aren't on illegal drugs? That's not what I heard about your poster boy Charlie Manson. I wish I had a supplier that good. He's still lit up like a Roman candle after all these years.

[gregrutz]

Whale trasitional fossils DO have four legs, maybe you should do some research before you make yourself look stupid.

[Chuichupachichi]

No matter how much or how little research one does, it is automatically true by default that to reject the idea of 4 legged whales can never ever possibly make you look stupid....... EVER! That is scientifically empirical! It's a natural law! In fact, it ought to be a serious criminal violation of the law to believe in 4 legged whales. It is truly that "STUPID"

Wanna know what else is STUPID? You know the fossils you told me to research? Those are precisely the ones I was talking about... Oh Oh

[gregrutz]

Whale ancestors had 4 legs,

modern whales have 2.

[Chuichupachichi]

Are there any other 4 legged whales aside from the "researched" ones? The Grand Prize answer is......"NO"! Since all the other whales (including all other, long necked, thin tailed, 4 legged, dog-like whales) haven't been lied about by having been accused of being "4 Legged Whales"

Here's just a little "clue" or "hint" bit of "insiders" information coming from someone with "inner circle connections" & that is "in the know" - it is generally agreed upon to be a fact, that whales don't have legs

[gregrutz]

"agreed upon to be a fact, that whales don't have legs."

Whales look like snakes?

Fish with fins?

Go look at a whale picture.

They still have there front 'legs', they look like flippers.

[Chuichupachichi]

Have you ever stopped to wonder why their front limbs "look like flippers"?

Its because they are flippers!

Also, take notice of how they neither look like legs, nor are they legs

Elephants still have their facial arm, it looks like a trunk. Tigers still have their Zebra stripes, they look like Tiger stripes. Fat snakes still have their Monitor Lizards tail, it looks like their entire body. Do you see the incredible validity of the asinine assertions within my argued examples?

Morpholobotomized

[gregrutz]

Yes, and their flippers have the same bones as all mammals. They are not fins like fish.

[JackWisps]

good job, well explained.

[elliottcooke]

you should get a tripod.

[demongoat]

good job Yldii you fail at understanding what a straw-man is.

a straw-man is making a distorted,easily refutable argument and claiming its what the other side says then knocking it down.

"it is a fact that life on earth has evolved, and evolves" is about as much a straw-man as saying the earth goes around the sun.

please read up on the subject before making unsupported claims

[Yldii]

If it is your motivation, thats cool to. But all you are doing is preaching to the choir. You won't change anyone's mind. You will argue and feel you have won, as will the opposition. The fact of the matter is that it is a no win argument. Many call themselves free thinkers, yet never present an original thought or idea. Rather they just regurgitate what they hear from countless others. Broaden you mind and truly think for yourself.

Peace & good luck to you.

[SlapEveryJew]

Never present an original thought or idea? Can you creationists do that? I've yet to see any arguments, ideas, or thoughts that are unique in any way. I know these comments are old but it pisses me off.

[Yldii]

Ok smart guy, give me an example of an original Thought. Science has none. It relies on philosophy for ideas. Science is a very valuable tool but it is not interested in truth. Science is about the what, not the how or why. In only finding the what, science can easily become the wool that is pulled over ones eyes. Why would what I think piss you off? You must be very insecure.

[Yldii]

I have seen all the evidence and I am saying that evidence is not fact. Nothing more. I don't care if life evolved or not. you never answered my questions BTW. Its just that I find a lot of young ppl who call themselves Atheist flocking to evolution because they think it solidifies there position. Which is does not. They seldom talks of other sciences. You seem like a smart guy, and if this not your motivation, then thats cool.

[Yldii]

Dude: your 12 and very naive. Adding the statement "it is a fact that life on earth has evolved, and evolves" to your definition is just a strawman. Not to mention that evolution does not produce the results as put forth in your Definition. If you want to study science, try Quantum Physics. Unless you are afraid you may find God there.

"Yes there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road your on,"

-Led Zeppelin

[Kujien]

So what are your qualifications in this claim?

Thanks for the Led Zepplelin because you know they were very wise :X. BTW not 12, 16

[Yldii]

Let me ask you these questions. What is your interest in evolution based on? Do you consider yourself an Atheist? Would you say you are a free thinker? Do you know what a strawman is?

"So what are your qualifications in this claim?" I have made no claim. I am just pointing out that a fact is a fact, with or without proof. But fact or not it cannot be claimed as such without proof.

[Kujien]

evolution has been proven through genetics,fossils, and many other things.

[Yldii]

Keep telling yourself that.

And sorry about misjudging your age there Sport.

Peace.

[Kujien]

Ok I will I try to keep myself in reality. So you are saying there isn't any genetic evidence for evolution? (please say yes). So there is any evidence for evolution in the fossil record? So there isn't any evidence in morphological traits? So there isn't any evidence with vestigial organs? If you wish for me to show you I will.

[SlapEveryJew]

How does someone's age invalidate what they're talking about? Using that as an argument shows weakness. Prove that God exists. Saying that Quantum Physics is a place that God will show up, surely you can explain.

[Yldii]

I never said age invalidates anything. God's existence requires no proof. Why don't don't you explain (with an example) the burden of proof to me? If you had some knowledge of Quantum Physics you might get what I'm saying.

[SlapEveryJew]

God's existence requires no proof? That's ridiculous. I don't believe in god for that exact reason. There's no proof. What in Quantum Physics do you find so convincing?

[Yldii]

"God's existence requires no proof? That's ridiculous."

How so? Did the atom not exist before we knew or had proof it was there? To believe in God, you may require proof. But what is true is true with or without proof. The physical universe is a metaphysical construct of consciousness. Where is the burden of proof explanation I asked for? Also, give me a physical explanation as to why thought influences matter.

[SlapEveryJew]

If somone came to you telling you that an invisible lion was sitting right in front of you, you would require proof. God is essentially the same thing. Why believe something without evidence? Everything that we know exists has evidence for it's existence. Everything except God. You can't prove God exists and you can't prove that he doesn't exist. The lack of evidence is more than enough to turn me away.

[Yldii]

"If someone came to you telling you that an invisible lion was sitting right in front of you, you would require proof"

That is why you are a free thinker? Seems to me that Dawkins does your thinking for you, as your lion is obviously a renamed spaghetti monster.

Try again. and what about a physical explanation as to why thought influences matter? Or do you also not believe that is the case?

[Yldii]

You came on trying to defend Kujien. That's cool, but if this current debate were with him, he would be giving me a much more coherent argument than you have. He doesn't need to be defended as he is capable of defending himself. He is an intelligent guy. You, not so much.

[SlapEveryJew]

No, Richard Dawkins does not. Richard Dawkins is a royal, arrogant asshole. Richard Dawkins didn't invent FSM by the way. What do you mean "thought influences matter"? I don't quite understand.

[Yldii]

"Richard Dawkins is a royal, arrogant asshole"

We agree on one thing. Who did start the FSM? Dawkins was the first place I heard it. On that I stand corrected.

What do you mean "thought influences matter"? What I mean is exactly that. The behavior of physical particles is influenced by human consciousness. Search YouTube for the 2 slit experiment to help explain.

[willowtreephoto]

read a real book on quantum,

[Yldii]

show me something to dispute what I say.

[NotSoOldHippy]

"What do you mean "thought influences matter"? What I mean is exactly that. The behavior of physical particles is influenced by human consciousness"

No it isn't. No human observation is required, a measurement device is all that's required to collapse the probability wave. Consciousness isn't needed.

[willowtreephoto]

"The physical universe is a metaphysical construct of consciousness." this line separates hippy quantum from scientific.

[abard123]

Why is it that we require proof for nearly everything around us but faith is sufficient for god?

[ezsandler]

Nice, although I don't think that any amount of aide or evidence would turn a creationist logical.

[cozmikzen]

Awesome!