@Antifaith29 airframe does not translate into ceiling, climb, armament, versatility, etc. I'm talking facts , you are talking semantics. Please disprove my stats.
@charms71 I dont need to disprove your stats, i think you're looking for an argument where there is none. I agree with your " stats" , guess you'll have to nerd rage at someone else, kiddo. Im saying the foxbat is almost as good ( and it is) and it can fire missiles if it wants to. It's no big deal , you dont have to get all worked up at it, you might drop your pocket protecter filled with pens. Im not talking semantics at all. The Foxbat CAN to edge of space flight, thats a FACT.
@Antifaith29 i'm the nerd because I know factual info as opposed to your long thin lines? And i'm the kiddo that knows better than a man who "claims" he's seen it happen? Arrogance is bad enough but ignorance sometimes qualifies as knowledgeable...as in your case.
@charms71 lmao , alrighty. I'm not sure why you're getting so angry about this. Ive seen it happen and you can too, just watch the video i linked. This really isnt a big deal, champ. Perhaps you should seek help in managing your anger.
What's the big deal here? Go out, find a girl ( or boy if that's your thing ) turn down the stress levels or something. You're getting a little upset about something that really doesn't matter all that much.
@Antifaith29 I'm not angry at all. You threw the first insults with your puzzling assumptions.
"What's the big deal here? Go out, find a girl ( or boy if that's your thing ) turn down the stress levels or something." ...that's is another example of assumption/insult.
Anyway you said the MIG outperforms and can shoot down an SR-71. I gave you the numbers which render your premise false. There has been nothing but an avalanche of BS from u ever since. You have issues with knowledge and yourself
@charms71 No, i said it can do that and shoot down an enemy plane. I didnt say sr 71. The very basic fact is that the mig 25 is capable of mach 3.2 , is reported to have a ceiling of 100k + ( although ive only ever seen 92.5 thousand. Not once did i say it out performs the sr 71 ( infact i challenge you to find where i said that). My premise was that it can do simaler things to the sr71 and it is weapons platform capable. YOU chose to get all riled about about your missinterpretation.
@charms71 And now, quite frankly , i'm starting to get annoyed with your inane , irritating bullshit. Do you do this all day? looking for people to start arguments over nothing on youtube?
I wasn't challenging you in any way. I have no doubt the sr 71 can out peform the mig as far as speed and height goes, again.. i was just saying the mig can do SIMALER.
Now, if we're done here, i'll leave you to it. I have no interest in arguing with you any further , i'd apreciate if you felt the same.
@charms71 And now you're just throwing in bs that has no relevance and arguing over who started an argument? Ok, champ. I'll take that as a win. Good day , i'm done arguing with children. Have your last word, kiddo. It's obvious you need it. Thanks for the laugh.
@charms71 One more thing, are you sure it's me saying the Mig is better? Scrolling down a little i see someone called zhangjingfei94 making that claim. Did you perhaps mix us up?
SR-71 stealth? LMAO - it out ran Russian missiles at mach 3+ at hyper altitudes.It was too fast and too high after they locked on to it. They fired anyways. I would take the F-15 and F-14 over any current, or soon to be, stealth crap. The f-22 CAN NOT break mach 2 LMAO!
@SuperGeronimo999 "estimated" mach 2.25... That means going straight towards the ground with afterburners ON at 40,000 feet for 5 seconds LOL. No climb rate, no power, etc... That is the issue.
I agree that the Blackbird represents an outstanding achievement i aerospace engineering. That said, even it is vulnerable to modern SAMs such as the S300 and now the S400 family. I speak as a non expert but more modern fighters with their attendant missiles are not as limited as the former soviet interceptors and could also threaten the blackbird. No doubt its a wonderful plane though
@MokomaSusi well yes for spying on villagers with an AK-47 as their most powerful weapon, but for flying over Russia or China, not a chance. Those are just unmanned airplane, not like some ultra high performance mach 4 jet that flies 90 000 feet high.
lol last week one us drone was shot down over pakistan lolololololol = another classic american fail lolololol
Ps3Reviews40 1 month ago
@Ps3Reviews40 it was never shot down........comprehension fail
mohiahmed1 1 month ago
@Ps3Reviews40 lololol u suck it was taken over and landed
xBABYxKICKERx 11 hours ago
@charms71 Doesnt matter. It can still do 'edge of space" flight at a decent speed , comparable to the sr. Imo, it is a better airframe.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 airframe does not translate into ceiling, climb, armament, versatility, etc. I'm talking facts , you are talking semantics. Please disprove my stats.
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 I dont need to disprove your stats, i think you're looking for an argument where there is none. I agree with your " stats" , guess you'll have to nerd rage at someone else, kiddo. Im saying the foxbat is almost as good ( and it is) and it can fire missiles if it wants to. It's no big deal , you dont have to get all worked up at it, you might drop your pocket protecter filled with pens. Im not talking semantics at all. The Foxbat CAN to edge of space flight, thats a FACT.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 i'm the nerd because I know factual info as opposed to your long thin lines? And i'm the kiddo that knows better than a man who "claims" he's seen it happen? Arrogance is bad enough but ignorance sometimes qualifies as knowledgeable...as in your case.
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 lmao , alrighty. I'm not sure why you're getting so angry about this. Ive seen it happen and you can too, just watch the video i linked. This really isnt a big deal, champ. Perhaps you should seek help in managing your anger.
What's the big deal here? Go out, find a girl ( or boy if that's your thing ) turn down the stress levels or something. You're getting a little upset about something that really doesn't matter all that much.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 I'm not angry at all. You threw the first insults with your puzzling assumptions.
"What's the big deal here? Go out, find a girl ( or boy if that's your thing ) turn down the stress levels or something." ...that's is another example of assumption/insult.
Anyway you said the MIG outperforms and can shoot down an SR-71. I gave you the numbers which render your premise false. There has been nothing but an avalanche of BS from u ever since. You have issues with knowledge and yourself
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 No, i said it can do that and shoot down an enemy plane. I didnt say sr 71. The very basic fact is that the mig 25 is capable of mach 3.2 , is reported to have a ceiling of 100k + ( although ive only ever seen 92.5 thousand. Not once did i say it out performs the sr 71 ( infact i challenge you to find where i said that). My premise was that it can do simaler things to the sr71 and it is weapons platform capable. YOU chose to get all riled about about your missinterpretation.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29
1. mach 3.2 mig's were relegated. Those were the first and they couldn't handle those speeds due to tensile stress on engine and body lol.
2. 100,000 feet? where did you get that? source please.
3. What is the range of the the mig's best armament?
4. Again, it's similar not SIMALER
5. I apologize if i mixed you up with someone...you get that one
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 And now, quite frankly , i'm starting to get annoyed with your inane , irritating bullshit. Do you do this all day? looking for people to start arguments over nothing on youtube?
I wasn't challenging you in any way. I have no doubt the sr 71 can out peform the mig as far as speed and height goes, again.. i was just saying the mig can do SIMALER.
Now, if we're done here, i'll leave you to it. I have no interest in arguing with you any further , i'd apreciate if you felt the same.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 oh wow. I didn't see this replies. Let's get started then!
1. you mean "similar", not SIMALER
2. you started an argument lol I didn't
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 And now you're just throwing in bs that has no relevance and arguing over who started an argument? Ok, champ. I'll take that as a win. Good day , i'm done arguing with children. Have your last word, kiddo. It's obvious you need it. Thanks for the laugh.
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 arguing with children?
I hope to maintain my argument on facts when I reach your age and to not resort to insults when I lack facts or knowledge.
The pleasure was all mine old man.
out.
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 One more thing, are you sure it's me saying the Mig is better? Scrolling down a little i see someone called zhangjingfei94 making that claim. Did you perhaps mix us up?
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 you are right one that one thing.
no love lost.
charms71 2 months ago
@charms71 Might want to find someone else to have your nerd rage back and forth stat war with. I dont need stats, ive seen it happen.
watch?v=K1GE_qKsZMs
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 You started the rage when you challenged me...even a blind man without using the braille would know ho's falling short.
charms71 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Antifaith29 mig 25's ceiling WITHOUT missiles is, 5000 ft short of the SR 71.
mig 25 with full armament has a ceiling of just 67,000 ft to which the SR 71 is at least 85,000 ft
mig's R-40 missiles have a range of about 60KM tops
sorry.
remember that the SR 71 is only a reconnaissance instrument.
charms71 2 months ago
Comment removed
charms71 2 months ago
A much better video without wild -noisey music. And well explained.
ETsonggalaxy 2 months ago
@charms71 You are right my bro , but still it was not much better than a foxbat or a foxhound , but still the blackbird is a legend :)
araw19india 2 months ago
@dvr123us they retired the blackbird because it kept getting shot down by soviet missiles.
Doffingnik 2 months ago
@charms71 mig-25 can do better:D
zhangjingfei94 2 months ago
SR-71 stealth? LMAO - it out ran Russian missiles at mach 3+ at hyper altitudes.It was too fast and too high after they locked on to it. They fired anyways. I would take the F-15 and F-14 over any current, or soon to be, stealth crap. The f-22 CAN NOT break mach 2 LMAO!
dvr123us 3 months ago
@dvr123us: What? The F-22's max-speed is Mach 2,3. It has Supercruise-Capability too.
SuperGeronimo999 3 months ago
@SuperGeronimo999 "estimated" mach 2.25... That means going straight towards the ground with afterburners ON at 40,000 feet for 5 seconds LOL. No climb rate, no power, etc... That is the issue.
dvr123us 3 months ago
I really miss watching firepower on military channel. they never have it on anymore :/
intrepidrock123 4 months ago
Never knew about the Quail decoy missile, fascinating.
trespire 5 months ago
for me black bird the most beautiful ...
leparditas 5 months ago
I agree! I think they developed that aircraft in just 6 years! Amazing!
Judyiack 6 months ago
@charms71 it's just another stolen german design...
HubertWolfen 7 months ago
Why does it show US WW2bombers when talking about window/chaff? It was a British invention and they used it during ww2
Xiolablu3 7 months ago
I agree that the Blackbird represents an outstanding achievement i aerospace engineering. That said, even it is vulnerable to modern SAMs such as the S300 and now the S400 family. I speak as a non expert but more modern fighters with their attendant missiles are not as limited as the former soviet interceptors and could also threaten the blackbird. No doubt its a wonderful plane though
22slither 7 months ago
Comment removed
MokomaSusi 9 months ago
@charms71 I agree with you there, even 40 years later it still hold the world record as fastest jet.
truonghthe 9 months ago
F-117 is the most beuatiful plane in the world
MsCasper2010 9 months ago
@charms71 it's a piece of shit.
cantroos 10 months ago
@cantroos lol...how?
charms71 10 months ago
@charms71 it doesn't even shoot any missiles or bombs and it's obselete because of satellites.
cantroos 10 months ago
@cantroos
Spy planes aren't obsolete. There is reason why USA is building Global Hawks and similar machines...
MokomaSusi 9 months ago
@MokomaSusi well yes for spying on villagers with an AK-47 as their most powerful weapon, but for flying over Russia or China, not a chance. Those are just unmanned airplane, not like some ultra high performance mach 4 jet that flies 90 000 feet high.
cantroos 9 months ago
Comment removed
MokomaSusi 9 months ago
@charms71 cannot agree more
nickcars100 1 year ago
f117 rules dont be racist to the russians that they copied alot from america, America was the first to copy russia and many more european countries
rox852456 1 year ago
@rox852456 yes and russia where also the first to put a man in space. they had technologys and didn't just "copy" american designs...
HubertWolfen 7 months ago
'
i like all american jetfighters,,,
i dont like ussr russia jetfighters,,,
ussr russia did copy steal from american jetfighters
bestamerica 1 year ago
Where is the Horten 229???
FreestylaBoy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Zoltan Bebto from Hungary. bebtozoltan@hotmail.com
bebtozoltan55 1 year ago
It seems quite incredible that the F-117 stealth fb is already retired!!
CRsBeem 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CRsBeem,
It seems quite incredible that the F-117 stealth fb is already retired!!
'
why retire,,,
no way,,,
must be keep service for good
bestamerica 1 year ago
@charms71 i hear you brother, so true!
boazandjiacinth 1 year ago
nice post mate keep them coming love stealth jets
bpford 2 years ago 3
GOD favorited this
lol
thejesusfreak919 2 years ago
NICE i really want to ride one ! ! ! ! ! !
Duky1994 4 years ago
Good vid, but I think I've seen this before.
0bs3n3 4 years ago
Thanks for the post. Keep it coming my good man. : )
Raywollesenfortes 4 years ago 8