@Liz84046 Im not here to change u but u have ur own minde up, on and realize it on ur way, for me fear of God makes me not to do what so ever Id like to do. so it's up to u. but the Bible Job is a raw-model 4 me, Job 28:28 and u kan even find it fear of God is wisdom in the book of King Solomon are u wiser than him ? dude u know then
@Liz84046 u can have ur on interpitation bout but I dont think U are better than King Solomon or King David nor Job so read the bible b4. Fear of God is wisdom ya true God is Love. so take it as u like it but even those who are chosen can be fooled by u know who ....
A few predictions made by evolution: 1) Animals evolve 2) Fossils exist 3) Fossils become more primitive the further you dig.
1) Observed via lab experiments, obvious in the fossil record, and DNA sequence similarity matches the order descent, perfect example being human DNA and other ape DNA.
2) See 1
3) The fossils found are more primitive the further scientists dig.
When a theory's predictions are met, you have a good theory. One would think that would be easy to grasp.
very hard to buy this theory. Iv learnt in this 2 decade Iv lived. they just make things 2 long the rope and tangled it: so u dont get or find the begining. cuz I always belive the fear of God is wisdom and departing from evil is understanding. fear of God is shield from evil and his children or follower n departing make it understanding cuz evil is tricky, mystry, alot riddle to solve. dont be afraid Cuz God is Luv u can win all this if u have love. greed is the begining of hate njealousy.
@Liz84046 If u not cuz u do evil deeds bro there, so Job said at chapter 28:28 fear of God is wisdom, and departing from evil is understanding. why u not brake the law cuz?? i prefer to read Bible give it time till I get it. Fear of God is wosdom
@MrTangodeep So you are saying i do evil things that i do not fear God? I know what god is capable of and i am aware of his love. But why fear him when he loves us? Shouldn't we love him, or try to love him as much and he loves us? When you fear some one you do not love them, but you are just standing by there side because of fear. I just believe it's better to love then to fear God when you know what he is capable of.
Here's a good saying: You don't need glasses to see through bull****. Theses are facts BASED on assumption. A theory is nothing more then an assumption, not FACT! Theories are MIXED in with science but its NOT science. I strongly advise you learn the difference because “When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me"(Serious Pun Intended)
@CROBN As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A clear distinction needs to be made between facts (things which can be observed and/or measured) and theories (explanations which correlate and interpret the facts.
@CROBN You still don't understand the difference between a theory and a fact. A theory is made up of many hundreds or thousands of facts. It is currently the best explanation of a particular natural phenomenon we have. It is always subject to change with the introduction of new facts. Also, evolution says nothing about the origin of life. It simply explains how life diversified once it already existed. Abiogenesis is what explains the origin of life. It is a completely different theory.
noting make sense, it is all fantasy. they don't even know what happened 100 years ago, and now they want to tell us - they know exactly what happened many million years ago.satans theory. we are better that, we got better brain than falsefull-scientists..
@waffiki What do you mean scientists don't know what happened 100 years ago? And you're handle on basic grammar (or lack thereof) suggests that you don't, in fact, "got better brain than falsefull-scientists.."
For anyone seeking the truth, not only are all living things NOT genetically related - no living thing is genetically related, not even humans. No human is genetically related to any other human.
If you are a real human, I want you to know the truth of your existence. You were created - you aren't biologically related to your family. In fact, 98% of the people in your family are blood drinking, shapeshifting vampires.
You know you are different, you have always known. Now you know the truth.
once ya get past the first 15-20 minutes, this video gets reeeally good, and a lot less confusing. Starting with counterarguments to criticisms that were not stated is kind of an odd choice, frankly.
All this research amounts to big business CASH. Most of it is conjecture.They make a truthful discovery then wrap it year after year with all kinds of things they can make up so they keep receiving that CASH.Don't you see there scams. Today they make a discovery like the string theory five years later it no longer holds up and is replaced by a new theory.
" Today they make a discovery like the string theory five years later it no longer holds up and is replaced by a new theory."
Wow, you got EVERYTHING wrong about that. String theory is not a discovery; it's a series of mathematical models that hypothesize elementary quantum behavior. It has not been replaced; there was nothing to replace or to replace it.
It's not hard to see how you get everything else wrong as well.
@TheZooCrew ITS A THEORY. THINK UP A THEORY AND YOU GET CASH RESEARCH MONEY. SINCE NO ONE CAN PROVE IT THEN THEREFORE YOU CAN'T DISPROVE IT. TECHNICALLY IF YOU GUESS ENOUGH TIMES EVENTUALLY YOU JUST MAY COME UP WITH THE RIGHT ANSWER. THEY ARE GUESSING GUESSING GUESSING GUESSING AND GUESSING WHICH IMPRESSES A VIRGIN MIND LIKE YOURS.
@Frank289100 If it's thought up it is a hypothesis, actually. Not until it's supported with a plethora of hard evidence, observation, or measurement is it considered a theory.
But by saying "omgconspiracydlkfnsllolz!!!!11eins" you do raise up an intelligent argument.
@zthomasack There was a cold fusion theory years back an from watch I remember these two scientist recieve grants, award and all kinds of other thing and in the end they made it up. THE STRING THEORY S MADE UP.
@Frank289100 String theory is based on mathematical logic in the form of a combination of quantum physics, general relativity, and fundamental Lorentz invariance. It is a mathematical model or framework on which these concepts can all be related which so far is the only model that has stood up to extensive criticism. It is not a theory (albeit its misleading name i.e. "string theory" not "the string theory") yet, but is a major contender for the theory of everything.
@zthomasack BULLSHIT. If I can use bigger capital letters I would. Its conjecture in other words they are GUESSING. In the end most likely its going to turn out to be BULLSHIT. If I can use bigger capital letters I would.
Yep, it's a guess. You know what else was a guess before the experiments came in? General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Atomic Theory, Electricity and magnetism. ALL scientific ideas start as guesses, does that mean they are all bullshit? And how do we know they are bullshit without testing them?
@KPhysicsGeek I'm targeting one theory and that is the string theory. There is presently five variations of this theory. If you guess enough times eventually you will come up with the right answer. My debate with you is on CANCER what business do you have interrupting my debate with others. A friend of mine had her tits chopped off because of these animals. They kept looking for cancer and kept putting the fear in her so she had both tits chopped off. 60+ years and still no cure.
@Frank289100 I'm sorry, you posted in a public forum. That gives me the right to respond to you, if you don't like it, take it to a private discussion. Yep, there are lots of variations on string theory, there are even more on gravity, what's your point?
I would like the name of that specialist who told your friend not to get treated for cancer please. This is the 5th time I'm asking.
@Frank289100 It's your choice to be ignorant. String theory is not a theory but a proposed model that is a major contender due to standing up to skepticism for the theory of everything.
I understand that it is a difficult concept to grasp, but please try to approach this with an open mind to avoid conjecting a false truth.
@zthomasack In five years this theory will collapse. They know at the present time there is no technology that can prove this theory. Therefore if you can't prove it neither can you disprove it. They are only buying time.
@Frank289100 So you don't really think it will collapse... :) Anyway - manipulation is the field to play on by conspiracy theories believers or fundies, governments or corporations, not science's.
Really what grants did Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann receive? During the grant applications their work was submitted to peer review and when it was unable to be replicated the applications for their grants were denied. STOP LYING
@KPhysicsGeek STOP LYING. your just proving may point when they were denied the grant money they got caught the rest didn't its all about THE CASH. One thing I can say about Pons and Fleischmann is at least they didn't pour battery acid into a widowed mother of four and murder her for the health insurance money and turn the kids into Orphans and we call the Nazi's animals. Hitlers turning in his grave.
@Frank289100 Got caught? They thought they were right, and ended up wrong. If they wanted the grant money, they just would have kept quiet instead of submitting their work to peer review.
Take a walk through a third world hospital, see all the people dying from cancer without treatment, then tell me that our method which has increased average life expectancy by a factor of 4 isn't working. If it's not working, why are people living longer?
@KPhysicsGeek See all the people dying from cancer without treatment, You think they are dying of cancer but you are totally wrong. They are dying of a disease which weakened there immune system. The cancer that is present is a symptom. As soon as they detect a tumor they label it as cancer when in reality its a disease that is killing them. Secondly they live 4 times longer. Then how come every week 10,000 are lowered into the cold ground. THE CASH. Hitler will be vindicated.
I would like the name of that specialist who told your friend not to get treated for cancer please. This is the 4th time I'm asking.
So if people have a disease that weakens the immune system wouldn't they live shorter if their treatment further weakens the immune system (which I freely amid chemo does) not shorter? And yet we see them live longer. Why is that?
Anyway we don't need transitional fossils really anymore the proof is in the pudding aka DNA that in itself will show us these things the transitional fossils just reinforces known knowledge..
I love how it's possible for an organism to grasp the mechanism that for the last 3.4 billion years has shaped every aspect of it's brain and body... When I was a toddler I used to stare at my hands and think 'why, how did we all get hands, why do we have 5 fingers?'. Evolution is pretty awe inspiring...
@JaySmith91 What's also more awe inspiring is the portion of these organisms that have the capacity to understand, even in passing, their existence yet choose to live in ignorance :(
@MetalxXxMayhem Eyes are cool and all, but the reason for having features is nothing to do with ourselves or the features usefulness to us. It's to do with the events and mutations that allowed our ancestors to survive slightly better than their contemporaries, without care or consideration for us. Also, we have plenty of sensory information to perceive depth without two eyes. A single eye can change focus to perceive depth. Sound can be combined with sight to infer depth.
@JaySmith91 But yeah, i totally agree with ya actually. Our brain is just that good. It's actually quite good at putting together our senses, even if they aren't all there. Pretty awesome.
I do have to note one of my pet peeves here. 'the' crocodile and 'the' cockroach are NOT species, they are ORDERS. (Humans belong to the order of Primates, which is everything from humans to lemurs.)
So the cockroach species we have now are different modern species, not the same as in the dinosaur age or before.
And when is the last time you saw a spermwhale sized croc like Sarcosuchus Imperator?
Species DO have finite lifespans. (Orders of life however can go on for huge stretches of time.)
I guess it bugs me for the same reason it bugs me when they show the chixalub impact and show the earth as having the same continents as it does now (Which wasn't the case back then.) or when they say we have to move of the earth in five billion years. (It's completely impossible for humans to still be around after THAT long.) (Maybe distant descendant species at most.)
And for those who would contest the last one. Complex multicellular life has existed for about 600 million years roughly. Add a 100 if you want, but it's less then a SINGLE billion. In fact five billion is probably about a billion years more then it took for the very first most primitive life to become what we see today.
Five billion years is alot. And in that timescale things CHANGE, and they change hard.
And again, I know someone may say that there's no current natural selective pressure on humans. Well, you wanna bet that that will stay that way for five BILLION years? Because that's a bet you WOULD lose. At this rate humans still have to try hard to not wipe THEMSELVES out. And in five billion years there WILL be asteroids, and quite possibly things like radiation from supernovae etc. And even if things go well humans WILL change. (Cyborgs, adapting to other planets etc.)
Given that there are four nucleotides in DNA and every three nucleotides code for an amino acid that makes 64 possibilities. But there are only 20 amino acids used, so what happens to the remaining 44 nucleotide combinations?
ITS ABOUT MONEY PEOPLE. ALL THESE REPUTABLE ORGANIZATION THEY MENTION IN THESE VIDEOS MAKE THIS STUFF UP AND THEY WILL KEEP DOING IT FOR YEARS TO COME. ACTUALLY IT WILL KEEP GOING ON AND ON. THE DAY THEY STOP MAKING ANY DISCOVERIES ALL THEY'RE DOORS WILL SHUT MEANING NO MORE BIG HOMES AND MERCEDES AND NO MORE CHILDREN IN THE POSHEST COLLEGES MONEY CAN BUY. THE WAY THE FOOD CHAIN IS SET UP DEFEATS THE WHOLE THEORY. THERE PLAYING US THE FIDDLE WITH SHIT ON THE BOW.
@KPhysicsGeek Are you so ignorant that you can't distinguish between good and bad discoveries and what I was trying to convey. We are talking about field of evolution and the so called reputable companies in this video. We did not mention Anti-biotic, computers and car engines like the 427 Ford high riser engine. Its all about money. They make up new discoveries for the grant money. Cancer research has been going on was decades at the cost of trillions of dollars its a scam.
"Cancer research has been going on was decades at the cost of trillions of dollars its a scam." Really? it it is a scam how come the life expectancy is much longer for cancer diagnosised people today than any time in the past?
Second, do you know how much your typical "brand name" (Nobel Prize winning) scientists make? Significantly less than your mediocre baseball player.
Third, you didn't actually attack any of the science. Prove the evidence of ERVs wrong is it's BS
@KPhysicsGeek If it is a scam how come the life expectancy is much longer for cancer diagnosised people today than any time in the past? Its based on a 5 year window. If you die a day after that 5 year window you survived cancer. Every year 500,000 men, women and children are murdered by the treatments especially from the drain cleaner chemo. Cancer does not kill you they do with the chemo. You Tube (Dying to have known) the Dr.Gerson therapy. Watch the documentary 1:10 minutes.
@KPhysicsGeek Are you specifically talking about cancer expectancy or life expectancy in general. Everybody I lecture about this cancer scam in the end acknowledges I was right. They die knowing if they left it alone they would have lived into there old age. Everyone that I knew who took it are dead. If you survive you survived the chemo. Secondly it destroys the quality of your life. Why even bother in the first place. Its all about greed the most practiced of the 7 deadly sins.
@KPhysicsGeek Well over 90% of doctors do not take any of the treatment nor do they give it to there families. Look at Dying to have known. Lets start there.
@Frank289100 I asked for studies, not anecdotal reports. I have some too, my mother, my wife's mother both suffered from breast cancer. They both went through the conventional treatments and the results? Cancer free at 25+ years. My wife saw 3 patients who did not get treatment other than medication for the pain in the hospital and the results? All 3 died within 6 months.
Show my the papers, show me the studies, don't give me these anecdotal reports, they're worthless.
@KPhysicsGeek First of all your mother, mother in-law and my mother never had the cancer in the first place. Most tumors are not cancer but are treated like cancer to fuel this violent greed. Mammograms are causing the breast cancer epidemic. My wife has a tumor in her breast for 27 years left it alone and the monster is still alive. The body at all times has tumors growing in it.Cancer is a natural occurring process, Tumors come and tumors go.The body is constantly healing itself.
That's right, most tumors are not cancer. However, these were. Unless you have seen the test results, I don't know how you can say my mother and mother-in-law did not have cancer.
Cancer is a naturally occurring process. So are heart attacks. It doesn't make it any less deadly.
Again, I ask for studies, not anecdotal reports, please show me some peer reviewed papers.
@KPhysicsGeek I'm going to call you Adam from now on. Adam lacked wisdom until he ate the apple. I'm surrounded by death here in NYC. I see it with my own eyes nearly all of them die few survive the treatments. I lecture them in the beginnings and after the treatments they tell me you are right it is a scam by that time its too late. Did you see (dying to have known.)
@Frank289100 yes I saw Dying to have known, and like I said before all I saw was anecdotal reports, no evidence. I have anecdotal reports, too. Like I said my wife is a doctor, she has seen many a body ravaged by untreated cancer. She has looked over medical records of her mom and mine and yet, you have the gall without ever seeing the record, without ever talking to either of them that what they had was not cancer? What because of some video? I can show you a video that shows aliens, so?
@KPhysicsGeek Ravaged by cancer only after they tampered with it. The biopsy is the most dangerous thing. The tumor you see is not cancer but your immune system encasing the cancer. It slowly samples the cells to make sure it kills only the cancerous ones not the normal ones. If the cancer is still in the malignant state before it reaches the benign the biopsy will release these active cancer cells into the blood stream spreading it all over the body brain, lungs, liver, etc. SCAM.
@KPhysicsGeek Who are you bullshiting. If you took a thousand people and checked them for cancer you will find cancer in most of them its normal. Cancer was a disease of the elderly years back. It was always present in the elderly when people got sick from other things. Back then they treated the illness and left the cancer alone. Your part of this Carnage your defending these murderers. Google cancer scam the horror stories are endless. Google: Ralph moss..
@KPhysicsGeek I WILL GIVE YOU A STUDY. WALK THROUGH ANY CHILDREN'S CANCER WARD. THIS CARNAGE ON CHILDREN IS MURDER. YOU CAN'T ARGUE WITH WHAT I SAY SO YOU COME BACK WITH THE WEAKEST ANSWER. I asked for a study. LIKE THE NEWEST STUDY ON CELL PHONES THAT THEY DO NOT CAUSE CANCER. I BELIEVE THAT ONE AS FAR AS I CAN THROW A PIANO.THEY CAN PUT A MAN ON THE MOON QUITE EASY WHILE PEOPLE HERE ON EARTH ARE DYING OF ALL DISEASES. BIG BUSINESS AND LIES.
So you can't cite a study, you can only yell in caps, huh?
I'll give you another study, walk through the hospital of a third world country and look how the kids suffering from cancer without modern treatment are doing and compare the recovery rates. It's order of magnitude worse than the "poisonous" treatments here.
@KPhysicsGeek A friend of mine's wife 8 months ago was diagnosed with bladder cancer. I gave them an A-Z lecture about this being the biggest scam its cold blooded murder. Like most they Didn't listen to me. She is now on the death bed. In the end they went to a specialist in NYC at Cornell. This doctor told them there mistake was taking the Chemo in the first place its a death sentence. Its astounding the capacity man has to do evil. Money hungry animals.
@KPhysicsGeek Years back they implemented In 4 Norwegian countries mammograms for breast cancer. As the years went by the breast cancer rate exploded they had epidemics of breast cancer. Mammograms are the major cause of breast cancer. 5 of the past presidents of The American Cancer Society were radiologists. There biggest contributors are the food industry. Recently there was a bill in congress to clean up the food supply. Guess who fought to overturn it. SCAMS.
Can I have the names of that specialist please? In addition, 1) Norway is 1 company. 2) Looking at the *Scandinavian* countries, there was an increase, this increase was almost entirely made up of early detection cases 3) The life expectancy after diagnosis ALSO skyrocketed. (Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973–1997, International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume34, Issue2Pp. 405-412)
@KPhysicsGeek We should do an experiment and put the flight attendants TITS in a vise under pressure where the cell walls are at a rupturing point to see if they get breast cancer. Put there tits in a piston ring compressor that should lower the cost of the "Study".
Now you're just lying. Stop it, there is a Commandment against that. Mammograms do not rupture cell walls, It that pressure did do that, then the cell walls in your feet should be doing it every time you walk, must less run. Second, if the cell walls rupture the cell is dead, therefore can't reproduce, therefore radiation would have no effect on it.
@KPhysicsGeek The gall. So pouring drain cleaner into little children torturing them for years and the parents seeing the thing they love the most being murdered by someone you though you can trust your oncologist, animals that will do anything for money who is far worse the SS officer in the death camps. I have been lecturing people for years about this cancer scam for years. If your wife is an oncologist she is a murderer. Justice will come later from GOD.
@Frank289100 I showed you four different studied demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment. Can you show me a study showing it's not effective?
@KPhysicsGeek As for the three who didn't take the chemo they died of something else. Everybody today is dying of cancer not from a disease. Why?. When someone is sick they go for a check up and the doctors find a tumor right away its cancer when in reality the body is dying from some kind of a disease which allowed the cancer to grow in the first place. The cancer is a symptom of something else. Those 3 people died of something else not cancer. Cancer doesn't kill you chemo does.
Amazing... so you, having not seen the tests done, met these patients or know anything about them are able to say that they died of something else when my wife, who was by their side in the ICU for 12 hours a day got it wrong. Tell me are you psychic?
In the wilderness wild life is based on a food chain. Throw the Darwin theory this video and all the rest of the bullshit they have been feeding us for years. If all evolved from a common origin it would have ate itself into extinction from the start. These are fancy videos narrated in a way to convince you. They feed into the foundation of the original concept Darwin came up with so they can make up discoveries that they discovered this and that to keep receiving research grant. Its all bull.
@Frank289100 One final thing, what is the basis of the food chain? (I'll give you a hint, look up photosynthesis) Considering this, why would it eat itself to death any more than it does now?
this is a wonderful video: straight away you address the crux of what makes up the crocoduck argument, ie the fallacy that modern-day species are descended from each other. I did a video on this, but your visuals put mine to shame haha. Well done!
@Mcgif21 I asked this question before, but I didn't see you answer it: Ok, let me ask you a question: Can you propose an experiment or observation that would disprove Intelligent Design?
I then listed 7 different ways to disprove common descent. Do you have evidence to present concerning those disproofs?
@Mcgif21 You do realize that both of those replies could have been one..? Anyway, I'm only seeing a lot of empty statements. I didn't specify your claim and I didn't address you, but if you can't comprehend, you claim of heaven and that you somehow are informed on your particular deity's wants.
@ThieleM I don't know which is more annoying, the Christians who think we'll all go to hell and discriminate us or the ones who believe they know what's best for us as if they could know what they claim
@Mcgif21 You need to understand from one Christian to another that Christ never did say anything about how old the Earth is which is really the issue. I do believe that there is a creator of all but I don't think the Earth was created 6,000 years ago. Science has proven otherwise. Ancient man described how things were made the best they could and they actually got the creation story from the Sumerian tablets.
@joecane6340 Im pretty sure they didn't get the creation story from Sumerian tablets. More than likely it was common knowledge back then. If the Sumerians and the Jews both wrote about the creation story and Noah then that means they just knew that's how it went down. You do realize Abraham came from Sumer
@Mcgif21 According to what we know, the tablets predate Genesis about 1,000 years and is the oldest written documentation we have. To assume that it was common knowledge is an assumption. It's more likely that the Sumerian tablets are the original and that the story was passed down many generations by mouth and then finally written down by Moses giving us a scewed version of the original.
@HSDclover I mean the Decimation and Diversification model, it accurately portrays the history of life, in that disparity peaks early in the tree, and then it may diversify. (Disparity = "body plans" diversity = different species)
@roont You guys aren't getting what Im saying. Just because something acounts the story or description of something evil does not mean it supports it.
@roont One question. Why would early humans need to become intelligent to survive in the plains of Africa. Wouldn't they need speed rather than intelligence which is reflected by all those living in the savahna. Tigers, lions, gazelle, zebras, all have speed. Not intelligence.
@roont True but wouldn't apes who are presented with the same tools such as hands and thumbs be able, out of necessity, become just as intelligent as us? What inhibits them from doing so?
@Mcgif21 why should they become more intelligent? Until the blink of an eye ago (evolutionary speaking) they were quite well adapted and successful in their niche. In addition, do you know how many calories a brain like our requires? They would either need a dramatic increase in diet or dramatically sacrifice their physical stature. I don't know about you, but I remember Jr. High: the smart, wimpy kids get beat up, they don't become the leaders.
@Mcgif21 Yes, but that's human society, as you pointed out gorilla society is much different as they are less intelligent. How do they treat the smart, wimpy ones? Who becomes leaders of the band?
@roont Evolutionists say that they humans and apes both came from an ancestor that came before. But I don't believe that so ya. If this was true wouldn't apes evolve the same way as man being that humans are far superior than apes. If humans are superior than wouldn't that mean apes would become extint because natural selection would of only chosen the superior being?
"If humans are superior than wouldn't that mean apes would become extint because natural selection would of only chosen the superior being?"
You can't seriously be this stupid..first of all we ARE apes. We are a subset of apes...secondly, lots of species ARE going extinct because of us and thirdly, it requires for us to do something to a species or their environment for them to be affected..think man, THINK..
@Mcgif21 We see the speciation of fruit flies when they have different environments, so it is the same with the primates. Most of the great apes live in jungle while humans rose on the savanna, therefore many things that are useful in the jungle (thumb and grasping toes on feet, etc) are not useful for humans.
In addition, what makes you say humans are far superior to apes? I CERTAINLY wouldn't want to get into a wrestling match, or climbing competition or even termite fishing contest with one
@KPhysicsGeek One word why humans are superior then apes: mind. Humans are far beyond more intelligent than apes. If ape wanted to have a wrestling match to the death with me I would just whip out my gun. Game Over. Or just tranq him.
So intelligence is the measure of who is superior? How many people have been killed by single cell organisms like bacteria or viruses? How about HIV/AIDs? Since it can and does kill millions of us a year, and we have no cure, does that mean it is superior to us?
Second, I propose an experiment, we'll drop you off in the jungle with just your mind and anything YOU PERSONALLY know how to build, we'll see who does better, you or the gorilla.
@KPhysicsGeek As a whole our species is far beyond any species in superiority. Our strenght is found in our numbers and our wits. Anyway the HIV is not dominant because it can still be contained by the human. Because it is not superior
learned it in school...never paid attention, i wonder why that person suggested it. It still does not change me from believing in God=love.
Liz84046 1 day ago
@Liz84046 Im not here to change u but u have ur own minde up, on and realize it on ur way, for me fear of God makes me not to do what so ever Id like to do. so it's up to u. but the Bible Job is a raw-model 4 me, Job 28:28 and u kan even find it fear of God is wisdom in the book of King Solomon are u wiser than him ? dude u know then
MrTangodeep 20 hours ago
@Liz84046 u can have ur on interpitation bout but I dont think U are better than King Solomon or King David nor Job so read the bible b4. Fear of God is wisdom ya true God is Love. so take it as u like it but even those who are chosen can be fooled by u know who ....
MrTangodeep 20 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hglundahl 1 week ago
Perhaps it is because there is enough evidence to conclude that this is the only way it could have happened...
TheSinisterScourge 1 week ago
and this, charlie brown, is why evolution is a fact. not just a theory in the common sense or a belief.
Here0s0Johnny 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Here0s0Johnny to be scientific it must be repeatable.
There are 7 postulates of evolution none of which are repeatable. Scientific theory is only proven to be a fact if it can be repeated
When do you accept a fact as scientific? When it can be repeated.
1. Nonliving matter spontaneously produced living matter by Abiogenesis
2. Abiogenesis occurred only once
3. All life is interrelated and descended from a common ancestor.
cont.
MaximusArurealius 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4.Multicell organisms developed from single cell organisms
5. Invertibrates are pylogenetically interrelated
6.Vertibrates are pylogenetically related to the invertibrates
7. Vertibrates are phylogenetically interrelated
This fucking faggot narrating this vid is a liar. He's full of shit. He tells one bullshit lie after another.
OWNED
MaximusArurealius 2 weeks ago
A few predictions made by evolution: 1) Animals evolve 2) Fossils exist 3) Fossils become more primitive the further you dig.
1) Observed via lab experiments, obvious in the fossil record, and DNA sequence similarity matches the order descent, perfect example being human DNA and other ape DNA.
2) See 1
3) The fossils found are more primitive the further scientists dig.
When a theory's predictions are met, you have a good theory. One would think that would be easy to grasp.
HybridD91 3 weeks ago
Wow, this is an amazing video.
I like how you introduce evolution objectively without event talking about religion or god, I actually recommended it to religious family members...
avrahams1 3 weeks ago
I love this video because is quite informative, seemingly objective while being respectful of other views it is assertive.
am101171 4 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
It's rather funny how some of the folks below don't know anything about anything, yet feel qualified to assert as fact that which we know is wrong.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
very hard to buy this theory. Iv learnt in this 2 decade Iv lived. they just make things 2 long the rope and tangled it: so u dont get or find the begining. cuz I always belive the fear of God is wisdom and departing from evil is understanding. fear of God is shield from evil and his children or follower n departing make it understanding cuz evil is tricky, mystry, alot riddle to solve. dont be afraid Cuz God is Luv u can win all this if u have love. greed is the begining of hate njealousy.
MrTangodeep 1 month ago
@MrTangodeep god is love but why fear him? I wish people to live not in fear of him but to love him as much as he loves us.
Liz84046 1 week ago
@Liz84046 If u not cuz u do evil deeds bro there, so Job said at chapter 28:28 fear of God is wisdom, and departing from evil is understanding. why u not brake the law cuz?? i prefer to read Bible give it time till I get it. Fear of God is wosdom
MrTangodeep 2 days ago
@MrTangodeep So you are saying i do evil things that i do not fear God? I know what god is capable of and i am aware of his love. But why fear him when he loves us? Shouldn't we love him, or try to love him as much and he loves us? When you fear some one you do not love them, but you are just standing by there side because of fear. I just believe it's better to love then to fear God when you know what he is capable of.
Liz84046 1 day ago
@MrTangodeep
Apparently fear of God isn't enough to make you literate, so God must not be very impressive.
TheZooCrew 22 hours ago
Here's a good saying: You don't need glasses to see through bull****. Theses are facts BASED on assumption. A theory is nothing more then an assumption, not FACT! Theories are MIXED in with science but its NOT science. I strongly advise you learn the difference because “When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me"(Serious Pun Intended)
CROBN 1 month ago
@CROBN As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A clear distinction needs to be made between facts (things which can be observed and/or measured) and theories (explanations which correlate and interpret the facts.
aaronbobaron 1 month ago
@CROBN I strongly advise YOU to learn the difference between theories and facts, because you obviously have no clue.
aaronbobaron 1 month ago
@aaronbobaron If you going to teach a theory as FACT, please explain how life gets started with non-organic material?
CROBN 1 month ago
@CROBN You still don't understand the difference between a theory and a fact. A theory is made up of many hundreds or thousands of facts. It is currently the best explanation of a particular natural phenomenon we have. It is always subject to change with the introduction of new facts. Also, evolution says nothing about the origin of life. It simply explains how life diversified once it already existed. Abiogenesis is what explains the origin of life. It is a completely different theory.
aaronbobaron 1 month ago
@CROBN Do you even know what "non organic" means?
HybridD91 3 weeks ago
noting make sense, it is all fantasy. they don't even know what happened 100 years ago, and now they want to tell us - they know exactly what happened many million years ago.satans theory. we are better that, we got better brain than falsefull-scientists..
waffiki 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@waffiki - "they don't even know what happened 100 years ago"
Having trouble understanding evidence, are we?
CamW30 1 month ago
@waffiki What do you mean scientists don't know what happened 100 years ago? And you're handle on basic grammar (or lack thereof) suggests that you don't, in fact, "got better brain than falsefull-scientists.."
aaronbobaron 1 month ago
@aaronbobaron
if the grammar was wrong, is because i am not an english speaker.
exactly what i said, is what i meant.
waffiki 1 month ago
For anyone seeking the truth, not only are all living things NOT genetically related - no living thing is genetically related, not even humans. No human is genetically related to any other human.
If you are a real human, I want you to know the truth of your existence. You were created - you aren't biologically related to your family. In fact, 98% of the people in your family are blood drinking, shapeshifting vampires.
You know you are different, you have always known. Now you know the truth.
theDracoIX 1 month ago
@theDracoIX - "o living thing is genetically related"
Didn't bother watching this video, huh?
CamW30 1 month ago
Does anyone know if any fossils where found of the common ancestor between us and the other great apes?
TheStJames23 1 month ago
@TheStJames23
/watch?v=MCayG4IIOEQ
This is not news.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
@TheStJames23 There is no 'missing link'. The whole chain is missing LMAO!
CROBN 1 month ago
@CROBN your statement is false. And I wasn't asking for a missing link, I was inquiring about your 225,000th grandfather. Troll.
TheStJames23 1 month ago
once ya get past the first 15-20 minutes, this video gets reeeally good, and a lot less confusing. Starting with counterarguments to criticisms that were not stated is kind of an odd choice, frankly.
attheveryend 1 month ago
@Frank289100 You say I'm "a queer who hates God."
Well, in that case, you're a queer who has a hard-on for God.
atheistram 1 month ago
All this research amounts to big business CASH. Most of it is conjecture.They make a truthful discovery then wrap it year after year with all kinds of things they can make up so they keep receiving that CASH.Don't you see there scams. Today they make a discovery like the string theory five years later it no longer holds up and is replaced by a new theory.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
" Today they make a discovery like the string theory five years later it no longer holds up and is replaced by a new theory."
Wow, you got EVERYTHING wrong about that. String theory is not a discovery; it's a series of mathematical models that hypothesize elementary quantum behavior. It has not been replaced; there was nothing to replace or to replace it.
It's not hard to see how you get everything else wrong as well.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago 4
@TheZooCrew ITS A THEORY. THINK UP A THEORY AND YOU GET CASH RESEARCH MONEY. SINCE NO ONE CAN PROVE IT THEN THEREFORE YOU CAN'T DISPROVE IT. TECHNICALLY IF YOU GUESS ENOUGH TIMES EVENTUALLY YOU JUST MAY COME UP WITH THE RIGHT ANSWER. THEY ARE GUESSING GUESSING GUESSING GUESSING AND GUESSING WHICH IMPRESSES A VIRGIN MIND LIKE YOURS.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
I design shit that flies in space.
Guess what? It flies in space, and not by accident.
You need a hefty shot of Thorazine.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
@TheZooCrew They should give you that mummy juice instead of that legal cocaine Prozac your mommy got you on.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 If it's thought up it is a hypothesis, actually. Not until it's supported with a plethora of hard evidence, observation, or measurement is it considered a theory.
But by saying "omgconspiracydlkfnsllolz!!!!11eins" you do raise up an intelligent argument.
zthomasack 1 month ago
@zthomasack There was a cold fusion theory years back an from watch I remember these two scientist recieve grants, award and all kinds of other thing and in the end they made it up. THE STRING THEORY S MADE UP.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 String theory is based on mathematical logic in the form of a combination of quantum physics, general relativity, and fundamental Lorentz invariance. It is a mathematical model or framework on which these concepts can all be related which so far is the only model that has stood up to extensive criticism. It is not a theory (albeit its misleading name i.e. "string theory" not "the string theory") yet, but is a major contender for the theory of everything.
zthomasack 1 month ago
@zthomasack BULLSHIT. If I can use bigger capital letters I would. Its conjecture in other words they are GUESSING. In the end most likely its going to turn out to be BULLSHIT. If I can use bigger capital letters I would.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Yep, it's a guess. You know what else was a guess before the experiments came in? General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Atomic Theory, Electricity and magnetism. ALL scientific ideas start as guesses, does that mean they are all bullshit? And how do we know they are bullshit without testing them?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek I'm targeting one theory and that is the string theory. There is presently five variations of this theory. If you guess enough times eventually you will come up with the right answer. My debate with you is on CANCER what business do you have interrupting my debate with others. A friend of mine had her tits chopped off because of these animals. They kept looking for cancer and kept putting the fear in her so she had both tits chopped off. 60+ years and still no cure.
Frank289100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Frank289100 I'm sorry, you posted in a public forum. That gives me the right to respond to you, if you don't like it, take it to a private discussion. Yep, there are lots of variations on string theory, there are even more on gravity, what's your point?
I would like the name of that specialist who told your friend not to get treated for cancer please. This is the 5th time I'm asking.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Are you saying she got a mastectomy without evidence of cancer? If so they would be a huge law suit and it would be all over the news.
60+ years and no cure, just a dramatic increase in life expectancy. Sometimes you don't get what you want, I'm still waiting on flying cars in 2012.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Frank289100 It's your choice to be ignorant. String theory is not a theory but a proposed model that is a major contender due to standing up to skepticism for the theory of everything.
I understand that it is a difficult concept to grasp, but please try to approach this with an open mind to avoid conjecting a false truth.
zthomasack 1 month ago
@zthomasack In five years this theory will collapse. They know at the present time there is no technology that can prove this theory. Therefore if you can't prove it neither can you disprove it. They are only buying time.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 "String theory" is NOT a scientific theory. It's a model that is a contender for a theory, as previously explained.
The same way that "Music theory" is NOT a scientific theory.
zthomasack 1 month ago
@zthomasack What ever it is its all BULLSHIT for now. In 5 years this model, theory, idea, guess, hypothesis, conjecture will collapse.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 Trololol. Wanna bet?
MidnightTea7 1 month ago
@MidnightTea7 They're going to keep playing you people the fiddle with the shit on the bow.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 So you don't really think it will collapse... :) Anyway - manipulation is the field to play on by conspiracy theories believers or fundies, governments or corporations, not science's.
MidnightTea7 1 month ago
@Frank289100 Because it hasn't collapsed in 150 years.
MzBUZZKILINGTON 1 month ago
@MzBUZZKILINGTON Be specific.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Really what grants did Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann receive? During the grant applications their work was submitted to peer review and when it was unable to be replicated the applications for their grants were denied. STOP LYING
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek STOP LYING. your just proving may point when they were denied the grant money they got caught the rest didn't its all about THE CASH. One thing I can say about Pons and Fleischmann is at least they didn't pour battery acid into a widowed mother of four and murder her for the health insurance money and turn the kids into Orphans and we call the Nazi's animals. Hitlers turning in his grave.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 Got caught? They thought they were right, and ended up wrong. If they wanted the grant money, they just would have kept quiet instead of submitting their work to peer review.
Take a walk through a third world hospital, see all the people dying from cancer without treatment, then tell me that our method which has increased average life expectancy by a factor of 4 isn't working. If it's not working, why are people living longer?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek See all the people dying from cancer without treatment, You think they are dying of cancer but you are totally wrong. They are dying of a disease which weakened there immune system. The cancer that is present is a symptom. As soon as they detect a tumor they label it as cancer when in reality its a disease that is killing them. Secondly they live 4 times longer. Then how come every week 10,000 are lowered into the cold ground. THE CASH. Hitler will be vindicated.
Frank289100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Frank289100
I would like the name of that specialist who told your friend not to get treated for cancer please. This is the 4th time I'm asking.
So if people have a disease that weakens the immune system wouldn't they live shorter if their treatment further weakens the immune system (which I freely amid chemo does) not shorter? And yet we see them live longer. Why is that?
BTW, where did you get your MD?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Oh, and I would like the name of that specialist who told your friend not to get treated for cancer please. This is the 3rd time I'm asking.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
THIS DOCUMENTARY IS JUST WAAAY TOO GOOOD!!!! who disliked this 3 times?????
borissman 1 month ago
Anyway we don't need transitional fossils really anymore the proof is in the pudding aka DNA that in itself will show us these things the transitional fossils just reinforces known knowledge..
LaughTonyLaugh 1 month ago
I love the fact I can actually cruise most of the comments and not see we are only 5000 years old and yadda yadda yadda woohoo....
LaughTonyLaugh 1 month ago
I love how it's possible for an organism to grasp the mechanism that for the last 3.4 billion years has shaped every aspect of it's brain and body... When I was a toddler I used to stare at my hands and think 'why, how did we all get hands, why do we have 5 fingers?'. Evolution is pretty awe inspiring...
JaySmith91 1 month ago 10
@JaySmith91 What's also more awe inspiring is the portion of these organisms that have the capacity to understand, even in passing, their existence yet choose to live in ignorance :(
D0ug91 1 month ago 2
@JaySmith91 I can tell you why we have 2 eyes. It's so we can see in three dimensions. We basically see the world stereoscopically.
MetalxXxMayhem 1 month ago
@MetalxXxMayhem Eyes are cool and all, but the reason for having features is nothing to do with ourselves or the features usefulness to us. It's to do with the events and mutations that allowed our ancestors to survive slightly better than their contemporaries, without care or consideration for us. Also, we have plenty of sensory information to perceive depth without two eyes. A single eye can change focus to perceive depth. Sound can be combined with sight to infer depth.
JaySmith91 1 month ago
@JaySmith91 Tell that to the people who make 3D movies!! xD
MetalxXxMayhem 1 month ago
@JaySmith91 But yeah, i totally agree with ya actually. Our brain is just that good. It's actually quite good at putting together our senses, even if they aren't all there. Pretty awesome.
MetalxXxMayhem 1 month ago
@MetalxXxMayhem They give us depth perception.
MzBUZZKILINGTON 1 month ago
I'm glad that someone made a video like this. I can now link all the idiots that I argue with to this video.
YetAnotherInfidel 1 month ago
By far the best video I have ever seen discussing evolution. Thank you.
ColorOfYouth 1 month ago
Couldn't keep watching after a few minutes - too much background music!!
franknhonest 1 month ago
I'm surprised at the lack of fundie comments in this thread.
karadan100 1 month ago 13
@karadan100 It's only a matter of time.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist True.
karadan100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Also, I asked for evidence that the ERVs mentioned in the video are BS as you claimed. Can you provide this for me?
Here is some of my evidence: Demographic Histories of ERV-K in Humans, Chimpanzees and Rhesus Monkeys, PLoS ONE. 2007
Sverdlov, E. D. (2000) "Retroviruses and primate evolution." BioEssays 22: 161-171
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
I do have to note one of my pet peeves here. 'the' crocodile and 'the' cockroach are NOT species, they are ORDERS. (Humans belong to the order of Primates, which is everything from humans to lemurs.)
So the cockroach species we have now are different modern species, not the same as in the dinosaur age or before.
And when is the last time you saw a spermwhale sized croc like Sarcosuchus Imperator?
Species DO have finite lifespans. (Orders of life however can go on for huge stretches of time.)
TheSkunkCat 1 month ago
@TheSkunkCat
I guess it bugs me for the same reason it bugs me when they show the chixalub impact and show the earth as having the same continents as it does now (Which wasn't the case back then.) or when they say we have to move of the earth in five billion years. (It's completely impossible for humans to still be around after THAT long.) (Maybe distant descendant species at most.)
TheSkunkCat 1 month ago
@TheSkunkCat
And for those who would contest the last one. Complex multicellular life has existed for about 600 million years roughly. Add a 100 if you want, but it's less then a SINGLE billion. In fact five billion is probably about a billion years more then it took for the very first most primitive life to become what we see today.
Five billion years is alot. And in that timescale things CHANGE, and they change hard.
TheSkunkCat 1 month ago
@TheSkunkCat
And again, I know someone may say that there's no current natural selective pressure on humans. Well, you wanna bet that that will stay that way for five BILLION years? Because that's a bet you WOULD lose. At this rate humans still have to try hard to not wipe THEMSELVES out. And in five billion years there WILL be asteroids, and quite possibly things like radiation from supernovae etc. And even if things go well humans WILL change. (Cyborgs, adapting to other planets etc.)
TheSkunkCat 1 month ago
@TheSkunkCat That is not even taking into account genetic drift and merging of ethnic groups.
Utmoon 1 month ago
Given that there are four nucleotides in DNA and every three nucleotides code for an amino acid that makes 64 possibilities. But there are only 20 amino acids used, so what happens to the remaining 44 nucleotide combinations?
pocoapoco2 1 month ago
Given the four A,C,G,T nuceotides. Do AAC,ACA, and CAA all code for the same amino acid? That would explain the 20 if it does.
pocoapoco2 1 month ago
3 people are creationists
Science1314 1 month ago
ITS ABOUT MONEY PEOPLE. ALL THESE REPUTABLE ORGANIZATION THEY MENTION IN THESE VIDEOS MAKE THIS STUFF UP AND THEY WILL KEEP DOING IT FOR YEARS TO COME. ACTUALLY IT WILL KEEP GOING ON AND ON. THE DAY THEY STOP MAKING ANY DISCOVERIES ALL THEY'RE DOORS WILL SHUT MEANING NO MORE BIG HOMES AND MERCEDES AND NO MORE CHILDREN IN THE POSHEST COLLEGES MONEY CAN BUY. THE WAY THE FOOD CHAIN IS SET UP DEFEATS THE WHOLE THEORY. THERE PLAYING US THE FIDDLE WITH SHIT ON THE BOW.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Yeah all those discoveries are BS, like computers, antibiotics, internal combustion.
Really don't mind you calling the discoveries BS, but it would be nice to put your money where you mouth is and stop using everything they give you.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Are you so ignorant that you can't distinguish between good and bad discoveries and what I was trying to convey. We are talking about field of evolution and the so called reputable companies in this video. We did not mention Anti-biotic, computers and car engines like the 427 Ford high riser engine. Its all about money. They make up new discoveries for the grant money. Cancer research has been going on was decades at the cost of trillions of dollars its a scam.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
"Cancer research has been going on was decades at the cost of trillions of dollars its a scam." Really? it it is a scam how come the life expectancy is much longer for cancer diagnosised people today than any time in the past?
Second, do you know how much your typical "brand name" (Nobel Prize winning) scientists make? Significantly less than your mediocre baseball player.
Third, you didn't actually attack any of the science. Prove the evidence of ERVs wrong is it's BS
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KPhysicsGeek If it is a scam how come the life expectancy is much longer for cancer diagnosised people today than any time in the past? Its based on a 5 year window. If you die a day after that 5 year window you survived cancer. Every year 500,000 men, women and children are murdered by the treatments especially from the drain cleaner chemo. Cancer does not kill you they do with the chemo. You Tube (Dying to have known) the Dr.Gerson therapy. Watch the documentary 1:10 minutes.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
I asked life expectancy, not survivability. I'm talking about quantitative number of years lived.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Are you specifically talking about cancer expectancy or life expectancy in general. Everybody I lecture about this cancer scam in the end acknowledges I was right. They die knowing if they left it alone they would have lived into there old age. Everyone that I knew who took it are dead. If you survive you survived the chemo. Secondly it destroys the quality of your life. Why even bother in the first place. Its all about greed the most practiced of the 7 deadly sins.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Cancer: Please provide me a study, statistics of small groups is meaningless. Here are some illustrating my point.
Pancreas. 2012 Jan 5. An International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of G17DT in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Respirology. 2012 Jan;17(1):134-42.
Factors associated with long-term survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Well over 90% of doctors do not take any of the treatment nor do they give it to there families. Look at Dying to have known. Lets start there.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 I asked for studies, not anecdotal reports. I have some too, my mother, my wife's mother both suffered from breast cancer. They both went through the conventional treatments and the results? Cancer free at 25+ years. My wife saw 3 patients who did not get treatment other than medication for the pain in the hospital and the results? All 3 died within 6 months.
Show my the papers, show me the studies, don't give me these anecdotal reports, they're worthless.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek First of all your mother, mother in-law and my mother never had the cancer in the first place. Most tumors are not cancer but are treated like cancer to fuel this violent greed. Mammograms are causing the breast cancer epidemic. My wife has a tumor in her breast for 27 years left it alone and the monster is still alive. The body at all times has tumors growing in it.Cancer is a natural occurring process, Tumors come and tumors go.The body is constantly healing itself.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
That's right, most tumors are not cancer. However, these were. Unless you have seen the test results, I don't know how you can say my mother and mother-in-law did not have cancer.
Cancer is a naturally occurring process. So are heart attacks. It doesn't make it any less deadly.
Again, I ask for studies, not anecdotal reports, please show me some peer reviewed papers.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek I'm going to call you Adam from now on. Adam lacked wisdom until he ate the apple. I'm surrounded by death here in NYC. I see it with my own eyes nearly all of them die few survive the treatments. I lecture them in the beginnings and after the treatments they tell me you are right it is a scam by that time its too late. Did you see (dying to have known.)
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 yes I saw Dying to have known, and like I said before all I saw was anecdotal reports, no evidence. I have anecdotal reports, too. Like I said my wife is a doctor, she has seen many a body ravaged by untreated cancer. She has looked over medical records of her mom and mine and yet, you have the gall without ever seeing the record, without ever talking to either of them that what they had was not cancer? What because of some video? I can show you a video that shows aliens, so?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Ravaged by cancer only after they tampered with it. The biopsy is the most dangerous thing. The tumor you see is not cancer but your immune system encasing the cancer. It slowly samples the cells to make sure it kills only the cancerous ones not the normal ones. If the cancer is still in the malignant state before it reaches the benign the biopsy will release these active cancer cells into the blood stream spreading it all over the body brain, lungs, liver, etc. SCAM.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 1) Funny, none of these people new they had cancer until they wound up in intensive care unit
2) Can you show me a study where this happens please?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Who are you bullshiting. If you took a thousand people and checked them for cancer you will find cancer in most of them its normal. Cancer was a disease of the elderly years back. It was always present in the elderly when people got sick from other things. Back then they treated the illness and left the cancer alone. Your part of this Carnage your defending these murderers. Google cancer scam the horror stories are endless. Google: Ralph moss..
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 I asked for a study, please provide me one.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek I WILL GIVE YOU A STUDY. WALK THROUGH ANY CHILDREN'S CANCER WARD. THIS CARNAGE ON CHILDREN IS MURDER. YOU CAN'T ARGUE WITH WHAT I SAY SO YOU COME BACK WITH THE WEAKEST ANSWER. I asked for a study. LIKE THE NEWEST STUDY ON CELL PHONES THAT THEY DO NOT CAUSE CANCER. I BELIEVE THAT ONE AS FAR AS I CAN THROW A PIANO.THEY CAN PUT A MAN ON THE MOON QUITE EASY WHILE PEOPLE HERE ON EARTH ARE DYING OF ALL DISEASES. BIG BUSINESS AND LIES.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
So you can't cite a study, you can only yell in caps, huh?
I'll give you another study, walk through the hospital of a third world country and look how the kids suffering from cancer without modern treatment are doing and compare the recovery rates. It's order of magnitude worse than the "poisonous" treatments here.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek A friend of mine's wife 8 months ago was diagnosed with bladder cancer. I gave them an A-Z lecture about this being the biggest scam its cold blooded murder. Like most they Didn't listen to me. She is now on the death bed. In the end they went to a specialist in NYC at Cornell. This doctor told them there mistake was taking the Chemo in the first place its a death sentence. Its astounding the capacity man has to do evil. Money hungry animals.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Can you give me the name of this specialist?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Years back they implemented In 4 Norwegian countries mammograms for breast cancer. As the years went by the breast cancer rate exploded they had epidemics of breast cancer. Mammograms are the major cause of breast cancer. 5 of the past presidents of The American Cancer Society were radiologists. There biggest contributors are the food industry. Recently there was a bill in congress to clean up the food supply. Guess who fought to overturn it. SCAMS.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Can I have the names of that specialist please? In addition, 1) Norway is 1 company. 2) Looking at the *Scandinavian* countries, there was an increase, this increase was almost entirely made up of early detection cases 3) The life expectancy after diagnosis ALSO skyrocketed. (Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973–1997, International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume34, Issue2Pp. 405-412)
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Finally can you explain the causation of breast cancer by mammograms because you get 10x the radiation from a 4 hour plane flight.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek We should do an experiment and put the flight attendants TITS in a vise under pressure where the cell walls are at a rupturing point to see if they get breast cancer. Put there tits in a piston ring compressor that should lower the cost of the "Study".
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Now you're just lying. Stop it, there is a Commandment against that. Mammograms do not rupture cell walls, It that pressure did do that, then the cell walls in your feet should be doing it every time you walk, must less run. Second, if the cell walls rupture the cell is dead, therefore can't reproduce, therefore radiation would have no effect on it.
STOP LYING
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago 6
@Frank289100
I'm also amused at you going on and on how cancer is a normal, natural process then getting upset that cell phones cause cancer. Which is it?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek The gall. So pouring drain cleaner into little children torturing them for years and the parents seeing the thing they love the most being murdered by someone you though you can trust your oncologist, animals that will do anything for money who is far worse the SS officer in the death camps. I have been lecturing people for years about this cancer scam for years. If your wife is an oncologist she is a murderer. Justice will come later from GOD.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 I showed you four different studied demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment. Can you show me a study showing it's not effective?
And she's an internal medicine doctor
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek
Gotta love fundie conspiracy nuts in all of their Dunning-Kruger glory.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
@TheZooCrew I really can't decide whether this guy is a poe or not.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Frank289100 Your flagrant lies are getting tiresome. Please refrain from posting your garbage anywhere.
atheistram 1 month ago
@atheistram Your a Queer who hates GOD.
Frank289100 1 month ago
Comment removed
atheistram 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KPhysicsGeek Something tells me Frank289100 lectures to people on the street. He's one of the crazies.
DON'T FEED THE TROLL!!
atheistram 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek As for the three who didn't take the chemo they died of something else. Everybody today is dying of cancer not from a disease. Why?. When someone is sick they go for a check up and the doctors find a tumor right away its cancer when in reality the body is dying from some kind of a disease which allowed the cancer to grow in the first place. The cancer is a symptom of something else. Those 3 people died of something else not cancer. Cancer doesn't kill you chemo does.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100
Amazing... so you, having not seen the tests done, met these patients or know anything about them are able to say that they died of something else when my wife, who was by their side in the ICU for 12 hours a day got it wrong. Tell me are you psychic?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Frank289100 cancer
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Jan;21(1):3-9 Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Chemotherapy treatment decision making by professionals and older patients with cancer: a narrative review of the literature.
Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1144-53. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
Current targeted therapies in breast cancer: clinical applications in the elderly woman.
Spano JP, Falandry C, Chaibi P, Freyer G.
Also, my wife is a physician an her experience shows that people who do not receive treatment die quicker.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
In the wilderness wild life is based on a food chain. Throw the Darwin theory this video and all the rest of the bullshit they have been feeding us for years. If all evolved from a common origin it would have ate itself into extinction from the start. These are fancy videos narrated in a way to convince you. They feed into the foundation of the original concept Darwin came up with so they can make up discoveries that they discovered this and that to keep receiving research grant. Its all bull.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 One final thing, what is the basis of the food chain? (I'll give you a hint, look up photosynthesis) Considering this, why would it eat itself to death any more than it does now?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek The way the food chain in the wilderness is set up defeats Darwins whole theory of evolution.
Frank289100 1 month ago
@Frank289100 How so?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
this is a wonderful video: straight away you address the crux of what makes up the crocoduck argument, ie the fallacy that modern-day species are descended from each other. I did a video on this, but your visuals put mine to shame haha. Well done!
heathenwizard 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 I asked this question before, but I didn't see you answer it: Ok, let me ask you a question: Can you propose an experiment or observation that would disprove Intelligent Design?
I then listed 7 different ways to disprove common descent. Do you have evidence to present concerning those disproofs?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 You do realize that both of those replies could have been one..? Anyway, I'm only seeing a lot of empty statements. I didn't specify your claim and I didn't address you, but if you can't comprehend, you claim of heaven and that you somehow are informed on your particular deity's wants.
pat5168 1 month ago
@ThieleM I don't know which is more annoying, the Christians who think we'll all go to hell and discriminate us or the ones who believe they know what's best for us as if they could know what they claim
pat5168 1 month ago
@pat5168 I don't know what I claim. I believe in what Christ claimed.
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 You need to understand from one Christian to another that Christ never did say anything about how old the Earth is which is really the issue. I do believe that there is a creator of all but I don't think the Earth was created 6,000 years ago. Science has proven otherwise. Ancient man described how things were made the best they could and they actually got the creation story from the Sumerian tablets.
joecane6340 1 month ago
@joecane6340 Im pretty sure they didn't get the creation story from Sumerian tablets. More than likely it was common knowledge back then. If the Sumerians and the Jews both wrote about the creation story and Noah then that means they just knew that's how it went down. You do realize Abraham came from Sumer
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 According to what we know, the tablets predate Genesis about 1,000 years and is the oldest written documentation we have. To assume that it was common knowledge is an assumption. It's more likely that the Sumerian tablets are the original and that the story was passed down many generations by mouth and then finally written down by Moses giving us a scewed version of the original.
joecane6340 1 month ago
@pat5168 You call it ignorance and foolishness. I call it Christ and Him crucified. "The foolishness of God is the wisdom of man"
Mcgif21 1 month ago
The standard tree is okay and all, but it gives the illusion of progress, They should be using the D&D model.
Kodakowl 1 month ago
@Kodakowl Actually, I take that back, what they used is fine, they aren't showing the dead ones, after all.
Kodakowl 1 month ago
@Kodakowl out of curiosity, what is the D&D model?
cuz all i can think of is Dungeons and Dragons, and I don't see how that relates.
HSDclover 1 month ago
@HSDclover I mean the Decimation and Diversification model, it accurately portrays the history of life, in that disparity peaks early in the tree, and then it may diversify. (Disparity = "body plans" diversity = different species)
Kodakowl 1 month ago
@Kodakowl oh thats what thats called. i have seen the model, just not its name.
makes alot more sense than what my brain came up with.
HSDclover 4 weeks ago
@roont You guys aren't getting what Im saying. Just because something acounts the story or description of something evil does not mean it supports it.
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@roont It should be simple enough. I shouldn't have to "constitute" anything.
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@roont And why were the "neanderthals" less fortunate then we were. If they are able to adapt just as us, then why did they go extinct?
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@roont One question. Why would early humans need to become intelligent to survive in the plains of Africa. Wouldn't they need speed rather than intelligence which is reflected by all those living in the savahna. Tigers, lions, gazelle, zebras, all have speed. Not intelligence.
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 They need to work in groups to bring down animals that they didn't have prayer of catching otherwise.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
Zebras do have intelligence, check out the website DearZebra (dot) com
psb1964 1 month ago
It is really simple and our creationist spouting in this thread is a perfect example.
Creationism is just an argument from ignorance
ThieleM 1 month ago 7
@roont True but wouldn't apes who are presented with the same tools such as hands and thumbs be able, out of necessity, become just as intelligent as us? What inhibits them from doing so?
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 why should they become more intelligent? Until the blink of an eye ago (evolutionary speaking) they were quite well adapted and successful in their niche. In addition, do you know how many calories a brain like our requires? They would either need a dramatic increase in diet or dramatically sacrifice their physical stature. I don't know about you, but I remember Jr. High: the smart, wimpy kids get beat up, they don't become the leaders.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek Ya but when they grow up they make millions. And the dumb kids doing the beating up are working at McDonald's
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 Yes, but that's human society, as you pointed out gorilla society is much different as they are less intelligent. How do they treat the smart, wimpy ones? Who becomes leaders of the band?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@roont Evolutionists say that they humans and apes both came from an ancestor that came before. But I don't believe that so ya. If this was true wouldn't apes evolve the same way as man being that humans are far superior than apes. If humans are superior than wouldn't that mean apes would become extint because natural selection would of only chosen the superior being?
Mcgif21 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mcgif21
"If humans are superior than wouldn't that mean apes would become extint because natural selection would of only chosen the superior being?"
You can't seriously be this stupid..first of all we ARE apes. We are a subset of apes...secondly, lots of species ARE going extinct because of us and thirdly, it requires for us to do something to a species or their environment for them to be affected..think man, THINK..
DrDopehat 1 month ago
@Mcgif21 We see the speciation of fruit flies when they have different environments, so it is the same with the primates. Most of the great apes live in jungle while humans rose on the savanna, therefore many things that are useful in the jungle (thumb and grasping toes on feet, etc) are not useful for humans.
In addition, what makes you say humans are far superior to apes? I CERTAINLY wouldn't want to get into a wrestling match, or climbing competition or even termite fishing contest with one
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek One word why humans are superior then apes: mind. Humans are far beyond more intelligent than apes. If ape wanted to have a wrestling match to the death with me I would just whip out my gun. Game Over. Or just tranq him.
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21
So intelligence is the measure of who is superior? How many people have been killed by single cell organisms like bacteria or viruses? How about HIV/AIDs? Since it can and does kill millions of us a year, and we have no cure, does that mean it is superior to us?
Second, I propose an experiment, we'll drop you off in the jungle with just your mind and anything YOU PERSONALLY know how to build, we'll see who does better, you or the gorilla.
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago
@KPhysicsGeek As a whole our species is far beyond any species in superiority. Our strenght is found in our numbers and our wits. Anyway the HIV is not dominant because it can still be contained by the human. Because it is not superior
Mcgif21 1 month ago
@Mcgif21
Contained? This is why it is beyond epidemic status to pandemic?
KPhysicsGeek 1 month ago