@drumline17 You heard me. If the Mythbusters can crush the myth that the moon landings were a hoax, then they should crush the myth that the Holocaust™ is a hoax too.
@IndisputableAttitude You don't need to be on mythbusters to do that. In fact, those of us with the reasoning of a dead parrot have already busted that myth
Anyone believes the "mythbusters" have any credibility watch the video "moon landing hoax - wires footage". "Mythbusters" are overseen by the government.
@miitube "overseen" which is ANOTHER fear-mongering dork conspiracy, pulled right out of your ass. You cant use dumb conspiracy #1 as proof of dumb conspiracy #2. Thats just making up your story as you go
let me tell you i have not started to watch the video and i know that the mythbusters will say that the moon walk is real because thats what these guys are paid to do they are debunking us
@Seigu007 How about you actually argue your points instead of resorting to silly little insults and trying to degrade your opponent? You could be right, you could be wrong. I don't care, neither does anyone else, solely because you're acting like a small child, and badmouthing other people over the internet. You've lost all respectability.
@SpreadingtheMuse Are you a brain dead idiot? … You are grasping for straws, and it’s pitiful to watch you sinking fast.I’d trow you a life raft but why make Darwin,”Who co-incidentally was not a scientist,” proud.
@SpreadingtheMuse Sarcasm is the effort of a bored mind at wit. Never mind what the internet and everyone else is claiming. Just look at the WTC7 video and tell me what do you think caused that building to fall down so perfectly vertically inside 6.5 seconds (basically at free fall speed)'
Scientific evidence are not "internet rumors" or "conspiracy theories", they are taken from the TV networks on that day.
What do you think caused that building to collapse?
@SpreadingtheMuse Fabulous--an ignorant fool invoking terms used in formal rhetoric. You know as much about logic as you know about engineering: NOTHING.
None of my assumptions are wrong, as you know, because they are supported by real evidence.
What real evidence do you have for your idiotic fantasies? Still nothing?
@Seigu007 Yes yes, I'm always so concerned about intellectual judgements made by conspiratard whiners on youtube. *snicker*
Evidence? WHAT evidence? You yelled "mythbusters should die" and were dumb enough to expect a gold medal? Thats only the inarticulate 4th grade reading level we've come to expect. ;)
If you want to argue the moonlanding, then stop foaming at the mouth like a rabid dog. IM THE Physicist here. Ill argue any point anywhere. Bring it on newb ;)
@SpreadingtheMuse Your’e a paper tiger and a fool, and a weak one at that.You are scared and it’s sadly telling by tone of your entire tirade.Perhaps you should consider taking a course in logic as well. I certainly would recommend it.
@Seigu007 If I'm the paper tiger, why are YOU the one weaseling out like a little girl? Chickenshit ;)
Yes we're all very sad that you couldnt even pretend to argue any science, but its perfectly predictable bluff tactics. Take a REAL good look at the movies I upload junior. Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy, but let me guess, THEY"RE ALL FAKE TOO! My god you've found another conspiracy! LOL
Dont time anymore newb. You had your chance to argue fact and bellyflopped. Now we laugh ;)
@SpreadingtheMuse My sharp whit and the fact that you just had to peek back in here must have you on the defense huh ?You’re simply crying because I’ve put you in a mental wheelchair for life.
Lay off the illegal drugs, you rodent. I heard the toilet scrubbing company you work for, will be doing random tests soon. You might want to be careful.
@Seigu007 Its more than obvious by now "tiger man" (lol), that you have no facts to argue, let alone prove. I stand by my challenge to debate any hoax point you bring up on any topic, anytime anywhere. Any bluffing or stalling on your part can and will be taken as your admission of failure.
SOME of us dont have to bluff you know ;) And if you stall even one more post without naming even a shred of evidence, I can and will rake you over the coals. Clocks ticking newb ;)
@SpreadingtheMuse Your Slothful Induction is meaningless in the scientific as well as the logic arena.
Maybe you should pick up a physics textbook sometime before running off at the mouth with diarrhea again.
You abandoned intelligence so fast you didn’t even have time to turn around, and just did a Michael Jackson moon walk backwards at breakneck speed. I won, end of story. Now come in here and honor your master.
@Seigu007 I'm still waiting for you to bring up ANY scientific point to argue. I'm the physics TEACHER remember? I've got more physics books on my shelf than you'll ever hear of. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You have a scientific point? BRING IT ON. Bring it the fuck on. But you cant and wont. Already admitted failure.
@Seigu007 I'm still waiting for you to bring up ANY scientific point to argue. I'm the physics teacher remember? I've got more physics books on my shelf than you'll ever hear of. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You have a scientific point? BRING IT ON. Bring it the fuck on. But you cant and wont. Already admitted failure.
@Seigu007 Youtube is the better forum for me, for my purpose being here. I'm mostly here on account of the lurkers who never post anything, students and such who come here for curiousity and get inundated with the stupendous ignorance of the hoax crowd. I'm here so they can see hoax retards get confronted, see them bluff and backpedal. I was a teacher for a long time and know exactly where my audience is. Its not backfield forums or classrooms, its social media. RIght here.
@SpreadingtheMuse Sarcasm is the effort of a bored mind at wit. Never mind what the internet and everyone else is claiming. Just look at the collapse of wtc7 and tell me what do you think caused that building to fall down so perfectly vertically inside 6.5 seconds (basically at free fall speed)'
The collapse of wtc7 cannot be considered an "internet rumor" or "conspiracy theory".
What do you think caused that building to collapse?
@Seigu007 I have nowhere near enough respect for your intellect to sapre time for any sarcasm.
Any idiot who brings up WTC 7 are almost to a man amatuer mcjobs without a days education. The more competent and thorough analysis I saw was the computer animation by Popular Mechanics where they showed the entire interior support structure and what parts were damaged. I have seen no refute of that analysis anywhere anytime. DId you even know it existed? I'm betting not.
@SpreadingtheMuse Thanks stooge. This response does more to destroy your credibility than anything I could have said. Then again, you’ve never had any credibility to begin with monkey so keep climbing up into your tree where you’re safe from the pack. It’s a shame watching superior brainpower such as mine go to waste on a bunch of crazed sycophants.
@Seigu007 So in other words, YOU are exactly the idiot mcjob I was referring to. And you got your widdle feelings hurt ;) LOL
Dude, I'd already written you off as a fruitcake when you brought up 911 on a APOLLO thread. ANY attempt to use retarded conspiracy X as evidence of retarded conspiracy Y proves nothing but how desperate stupid your evidence is for BOTH. Its called making up your story as you go. And you got caught.
@Seigu007 So in other words YOU ARE exactly the cry-baby mcjob I was referring to, whining about conspiracies to pretend to feel important. And you got your widdle feelings hurt? LOL ;)
Dude you were already written off as a fruitcake when you brought up 911 on an APOLLO thread. Using one retarded conspiracy as proof of ANOTHER retarded conspiracy only proves how desperately stupid your evidence is for BOTH. SOME of us dont need to make up our story as we go
@SpreadingtheMuse I’m laughing all the way to the bank. You’re simply crying because I’ve put you in a mental wheelchair for life.
Lay off the illegal drugs, you rodent. I heard the toilet scrubbing company you work for, will be doing random tests soon. You might want to be careful..
Why dont you invent a THIRD conspiracy to explain any your incompetence in proving the previous two? That'll make you look real smart ;)
I'm going to leave you here to stew for a while, I cant wait around for you to charge in here like the offended little boy yelling BUT...BUT...BUT YOU LAUGHED AT ME!
@SpreadingtheMuse You can’t keep you mind on nothing else. Not even the fact that it’s not a healthy idea to bare one’s heart in front of a group of people whose sole goal is to make fun of you. From this point on, you’ll be referred to as “Cisqo The Dancing Clown.”
@Seigu007 Well I hope 36 hours was enough time for you to cool off. And not charge in here like a little boy with "But....but....but.... you INSULTED ME AND IM GONNA GET YA!" LOL
Lets see how fast you come charging in here this time. Rest Assured, it'll involve ANOTHER dumb conspiracy, more retarded "fact" that only makes sense to another conspiracy retard.
ALL CONSPIRACIES are retarded. And the more of them you believe, the dumber you get. 911/Apollo slash nerds are living proof ;)
@SpreadingtheMuse Your Slothful Induction is meaningless in the scientific as well as the logic arena.
Maybe you should pick up a physics textbook sometime before running off at the mouth with diarrhea again.
You abandoned intelligence so fast you didn’t even have time to turn around, and just did a Michael Jackson moon walk backwards at breakneck speed. I won, end of story. Now come in here and honor your master.
@SpreadingtheMuse Before you attempt a feeble insult against someone's intelligence, learn enough grammar to put an apostrophe between "I" and "m" in "I'm". I really don't care much about this debate, but both sides would be better off if they avoided ad hominems.
@IndisputableAttitude My insults are NEVER "feeble." ;) And stop whining long enough to learn rudimentary youtube custom. The 500 char limit makes the "I" and "m" difference meaningless. We have limited space and it cant be wasted with a dorky english class. In case you didnt notice, this is not the Queens Parliament, sorry to break it to you ;)
ad hominems are all apollo deniers deserve. They peddle ignorance and paranoia so they're treated as the idiots they are.
@SpreadingtheMuse You come across like a moron with your lack of grammar. Your presentation is part of your message. Junk presentation means you have a junk message. I'll be sitting in the executive suite while you (with your poor English skills) will be pushing a mop. Like I said before, on this debate: I have to admit some of the footage looks fishy, like when guy on left stands up like a cable is supporting him. Wow, 500 words isn't a terrible limit, after all.
@IndisputableAttitude Any whine of "grammar" is an obvious stall to avoid discussing fact. Its a predictable waste of time to steer the debate away from science and fact. Its tried every day by intellectual ignorants and you're merely the latest one. ;) This is a SCIENCE debate. Argue anything on that basis or admit you're jsut here to waste everyones time. We've heard it all before by morons who didnt need to retreat quite so fast as you did ;)
@IndisputableAttitude And I see no cable. And strangely enough, the only people who do are coincidentally already on record as being rabid anti-NASA. Fishy ;)
Funny though, I actually took the time to actually ask a professional theater worker, who informed me that wire work that sophisticated did not exist in the 60's. But we have retards like you who watch 30 sec of the Matrix and pretend that makes you an expert. Dont make dumb assumptions about what you're a newb in
@SpreadingtheMuse I don't see a cable either, just the appearance of a hidden one. Is it possible that the landings were real, but the footage was fake? Also, "don't" is spelled with an apostrophe, so please improve your writing.
@IndisputableAttitude 'dont' is spelled however it gets across. This isnt the Queens Parliment you know. We only have 500 char and Im not wasting even one on an artsy fartsy apostrophe. Read it my way or leave.
@SpreadingtheMuse I'm going to stay here, but ignore your drivel. Exchanging ideas with a moron will damage my intellectual sharpness. If a professional chess player wants to improve his game, he doesn't play chess with beginners. So too do I not want to discuss something with a poorly educated imbecile such as you, as your stupidity might be contagious. Good day, and have fun talking to people stupid enough to engage you.
if anyone on earth would be in a position to call the moon landings fake...it would be the russian government! and guess what, russians, with all that space technology and the fact that losing the space battle to Americans really pissed them off...HAVE NEVER QUESTIONED THE VERACITY OF THE MOON LANDINGS! thats the biggest proof of them all.
@poralentierno You make a very good point. There is no way to prove anything beyond doubt because humans are doubtful, but it is reasonable to believe that the moon landings did happen.
@poralentierno the americans spent billions of money to invent a pen that could write in zero gravity(cos the ink and all) the russians used a PENCIL :))))))))))
@Stealthomas NASA uses a pen for PERMANENT record-keeping. Whats the point in making documents that can just be erased at will? The pencil just let the Russians fudge their numbers. We didnt even know how many cosmonauts died in their programs until 30-40 years later.
@SpreadingtheMuse the point in me saying that was to point out that sometimes we think too much and waste time n resources when the solution is simple and already there
@Stealthomas yeah the "pencil" thing has been used as a huge joke at NASA's expense. But my point was that people skip to the dumb joke without ever thinking that just maybe NASA had a master plan that they never bothered to find out. Its easy to joke, but harder to take the time to learn.
@SpreadingtheMuse a pencil works.. and u say that NASA made the pen so that it wont be erased? but.. NASA can just destroy the paper or whatever they wrote it on or keep it from public eye... therefore your argument is invalid
@Stealthomas Sure they could destroy the paper. But using a pen at least gives the illusion that they give a damn about responsible record keeping. I've worked in a few government labs, and using a pen for all documents is mandatory. Using a pencil is the fast track to disciplinary action
@SpreadingtheMuse NASA transmits back to the launch center every now and then and the shuttle is equipped with state of the art sensors and such so.. officials could check on the astronauts(which were CAREFULLY selected)if they wanted too... just admit it the americans thought too much and invented that pen.. and the funds could have been used to find a cure for cancer or another illness/to create more jobs or in another project.
@Stealthomas I actually WORK in a gov lab. Pens are required cause they're permanent and easier to read, to name only two reasons. "thinking too hard" is a cliche by armchair bureaucrats who think correctly spelling "NASA" makes them an expert on space travel. You need to admit that there are things you dont know.
And come the hell on. If a few million dollars would have cured cancer then it would have been cured 50 years ago.
@SpreadingtheMuse hmm... in the past EVERYBODY thought flying would be impossible so the wright brothers were on they on and they did it and now we are able to travel into space so um.. yea curing cancer is possible if you do it right and yes you will get it right trial and error the money used in the "space pen" could go a long way and you yourself is a "armchair bureaucrat" pencils were not used because broken leads and the graphite dust posed a problem in space the russians used greased lead
@Stealthomas Of course we'll cure cancer. But it was stupid for you to infer that the primary reason we havent is because NASA wants pens on its space shuttles. It was a moronic stretch and you know it.
Since I actually work in the field, do a job in the trenches of laboratory employ, I'm no more "armchair" than shallow NASA detractors can claim to be rocket scientists.
If you knew about the graphite dust, whats there to argue about?
@SpreadingtheMuse um russians used GREASED leads? and the graphite dust and broken leads in space were the main reasons why they made the pen but greased leads easily solved the problems if you didnt know that then you are just a idiot plucking nonsense from thin air and expecting to get gold? if you are UNABLE to accept REASONING then u might as well shut ur mouth cos its ridiculous
@SpreadingtheMuse sure i am the "dumbass" you have such a excellent logic spend millions inventing pen(millions which could be put to better use like how to go to mars and stuff) is better than using greased lead hmm "tingtingting" we have a winner "facepalm"
@SpreadingtheMuse hmm... are you are a wannabe troll? cos you comment on every other person comments too and you try to annoy thm... if u want to be a troll pls u are doing a lousy job and you should get a paying job cos with this kind of retarded attitude wouldnt get you far... unless you are just a keyboard warrior? or this is your alter ego to make yourself feel better... i understand you were bullied as a kid and mayb now still so doing this "helps"you feel better its alright :)
@SpreadingtheMuse since you did not know that and you can proudly mock others when you yourself oversaw that detail...you are in no position to correct others..good day
@Stealthomas I said "To name only two reasons" remember? Its right there in my post. So try again. Since you yourself gave a reason of your own, there's no point denying that NASA did the right thing by insisting pens
As a Brit I sat up all night to watch this fantastic history making moon landing. I feel that it denegrates the men and women involved in this to say it didn't happen.For it not to happen as some people say it would mean all the "people" involved in the hoax would have to keep silent (sorry thats not going to happen) someone would talk & they have not.America put a man on the moon first get over it.
@MrHeadrocker50 here ! here ! I watched this on TV as a kid in the 60's too ! what a great time to grow up in !
it is unfortunate that those with limited ability to learn will question even eyewitness testimony in their zeal to undermine any anomaly they dont readily understand. for every one of the inconsistencies noted there is a logical explanation. the USSR could have gotten some serious mileage out of a hoax claim and they never said a word. experts agree and the infantile minded disbelieve
@MrHeadrocker50 not just that the main dude saying it was a hoax is a complete moron, and his understanding is so uneducated he brings down the other moon hoaxer theorist with his pure stupidity. Watch my moon walk vid to see some points, that were failed to be made to that idiot.
@davidleegoth completely impossible? Did you really just rule out decades worth of research, development and innovation in spite of overwhelming evidence simply because recording technology didn't parallel the technological advances of aero/astrodynamic engineering?
@davidleegoth Just one word, of a reasonably sized paragraph - none of which you actually responded to. If you are completely thrown off your game by a single swear word, then you are either a sadly sheltered puritan, or just using it as an excuse to hide your ignorance (the more likely option)
@davidleegoth So, I suppose ISS, Mir, ICBMs, telecommunications satellites, GPS, TV satellites, every kind of guided missile currently in use by any military of sufficient technological advancement and funding, and so much more, all of that is part of some massively elaborate hoax, then?
@davidleegoth These photographic experts were unaware of astronomical albedo; ie the reflective qualities of the uneven lunar surface. They can't, obviously, be an expert in every field.
We know the lunar surface reflects quite a bit of light; as can be seen on clear nights when moonlight illuminates the Earth. This is the 'artificial' light that has misled some people.
@87mrks No, because you only get about 20 seconds of weightlessness at a time. There are longer sequences of men on the moon, and in much larger areas.
lol fucking lol next will be mars landings fake and all u bitches will fool for it :),the joke of man spending 12 months on earth to simulate the journey,fucking dumb fuckers lol
"inside job" = newb whine. THANK GOD we have illterate youtards to tell us these things. I almost listened to a professional engineer who actually works for a living
I have to disagree with these guys on this. There is way too much evidence to prove the moon landing was faked. NASA has money and they could have easily paid Mythbusters to do it exactly this way.
@sedwardlawson, oh you mean those brainwashing conspiracy video's who uses fabricated evidence, putting things out of context, twist facts and then call it "evidence".
Its almost unnecessary for us Pro-moonwalker types to argue with the moon landing skeptics. Clearly they are to stubborn to be proven wrong, and they feel some sort of accomplishment " Knowing " so much that us " brainwashed sheeple " don't about the moon landings. I'm sorry for them that they can't accept the fact that mankind ( so be it if it was Americans) were able to actually journey to, and land on another heavenly body. Its truly a beautiful thing that we made it to the moon.
@mayapurcandra108 They were filmed with wires AND slow motion. Take Adam's wire jump and slow it down to 67% and render it as one clip with John Young's jump. It will be the same.
@Stardestroyer212 LOL Don't you know, the aliens that built the pyramids also helped NASA fake the moon landings. Here is what happened. The aliens traveled across the universe, built the pyramids but their alternator went out and they couldn't get home so the gov built area 51 for the aliens to study film resulting in them being able to help fake the moon landings. They also gave us computer technology so rich guys can take over the world.lol WoW I could be a conspiracy nut, what do you think?
@hotpocketpoison lol not only stupid but crazy as well lol no wonder you STILL thing man went to the moon :) ;) it is my video post on that page,but yes i did look at your empty profile,to see that you have nothing,and that didnt supprise me :).is you do want to wake up let me know.have a good day
@hotpocketpoison and what did YOU get from it, billions of dollars wasted just to prove to the soviet union that you have the tech? korolev was 100000000x more skilled than braun, if he would allow himself to be treated instead of working on the vostok you would see a soviet flag on the moon. and no, im not pro-soviet, i just dont like when americans boast of how skillful they are coz they went to the moon, and honestly, i didnt see it, i dont believe it.
Russians don't exactly have the greatest record of safety. There's the old joke that NASA spent millions to develop a pen that worked in space, and the Soviets just used a pencil. Which they did, and didn't spend millions on a pen. Pencil bits can get behind equipment, short it out, and start a fire.
Russian cares NOTHING for it's soldiers, or people in this line of work. There's been rumors for years that dozens of their cosmonauts died in tests. with no acknowledgement
of them existing. Russia might have gotten to the moon, costing hundreds of human lives in the process. And they wouldn't have acknowledged any of them.
And if seeing something is the only way you believe in it, I guess all the technology you benefit from doesn't exist, right? You didn't see them deploy the GPS satellites, right? You enjoying that technology? The US Government placed the original GPS satellites in orbit.
I don't think you are pro-Soviet, but are anti-American
@TheDarkNobleOne But I don't get one thing. Why is there not a single Satellite which can take photographs of the landing area with high resolution? Why?
Why is even google earth not having the real deal in google moon
@ytmoog Yes!! Thanks dude!! I was not used to be like this. I grew up eating Cereal and watching Apollo program documentaries my Father and mother brought for me. I grew up literally "Breathing" science. One day I saw the skeptics video and was astonished and out of my mind. I really really believed and knew that they went up there to the moon, but somewhere i had a doubt and now I am clear again like when I was a kid! .. All i wanted was these pictures. Thanks dude!
@yesiamawizardjonny Test wasn't dumb, You simply can't comprehend it. Regardless, just like all the other evidence that proves we went there, along with the 'evidence' that proves we didnt, is questionable on both sides.
I believe its real. Recent detailed imaging of moon (by japan) shows the landing site & terrain displays images that are virtually identical to the images taken by Apollo.
Radio signal bouncers of the moon say that it takes 2,56 second. Houston over California.....down under, based on the delay you hear when they call, would be around 8 - 10 seconds, even more.
You misread that. Thats 2.5 sec TOTAL, not one way.
The moon is 300,000,000 meters away. Light travels at 300,000,000 meters a sec. Easy math. It takes one sec to get there and one sec to get back. 2.0 + TOTAL.
Yes, 2,56 sec both way, does it not have to go both ways ?. Do you have to play dumb ?. Then both ways from Houston over California.....down under....Communication between ISS and someone on Earth is between 3 sec and 8 sec, based on what's is videoed on YouTube. So don't you think it's far above between Houston and the Moon.
The 8 second is ridiculous. There's no distance on Earth that takes more than a fraction of a sec to get to. You can talk to someone in Australia and he'll hear your voice on the line BEFORE someone across the room will. Thats how fast light is. Going to the moon and back is the only delay of any kind. And that only adds one sec per direction.
LOL if you were too stupid to know the speed of light, which I learned in the 3rd grade, then its your fault for being an ignorant, not mine for pointing it out.
REAL "truth," like you claim to cherish but dont, would admit like an adult that you screwed up.
You are playing dumb, living in denial of the reality. Cover yourself under playing dumb. You are a disgusting type. You Moon hoaxsters playing dumb is pathetic.
Little boy, it's you there are running out of talking points, that's why you play dumb, playing dumb is the only talking point you have. And that proves you are an immature Moon hoaxster, there have a problem with your fairy tale.
Anyone can look up and calculate a theoretical travel time to the Moon. I said the time it takes to bounce off a signal is 2,56 sec. then you have to include time from Houston, and you know that, that's why you play dumb. Are you so immature that you don't understand you degrade yourself and humans by playing dumb......dumb smart.
HOW MUCH time from Houston? Since you were too stupid too look up yourself how long it takes light to get to the moon how can we trust you here? You blindly believed a dork webpage like a newb and got burned for it ;) Next time do your OWN research little boy.
And guess what dufus, I just did the math. The Earth is 40,000,000 meters around. That means light can go ALL THE WAY AROUND in 0.12 sec.
Why do you keep playing dumb ? I blindly believed a radio Moon bouncing website, is 2,56 sec. wrong then ? I guess you just play dumb, that's what you are good at. Cant you see you degrade yourself by this playing dumb.
You started this stupidity saying that it was EIGHT seconds or more. Not only did you blindly believe that without the slightest effort to think for yourself, you still havent even admitted its dead wrong.
Lets make sure we're on the same page: Was saying we needed to have an eight second delay (when the moon is only 2 seconds round trip), wrong and in error?
Still playing dumb, it's still 2,56 seconds, and still it's from Houston over california....down under. The delay in the ISS communication is between 3 - 8 seconds. Can't you come up with something other, than playing dumb.....no, I know you can't, playing dumb is all you got left.
You're still ignoring 8th grade science ;) I proved to you light can travel all the way around the world in 0.12 sec. Not 3. Not 8. How can you pull 8 sec out of your ass when it only takes 0.12? Is that calculation wrong? PROVE it. I asked you to explain exactly how long it took a message to get from Houston to California and you flunked.
Can you provide ANY hard facts? Do you even remember what the speed of light is? Of course not. You have no newb idea.
Do you have to keep playing dumb. Sound does not move with the speed of light in a transmission system, does it. It does not in the news, it does not from the ISS. Don't you think you degrade yourself by this playing dumb.
ARE YOU AN IDIOT? Well... yes ;) Sound via radio waves moves at THE SPEED OF LIGHT! What kind of retard doesnt know that???
Well, other than you ;)
Radio waves, microwaves, visible light, fiber optics, electricity etc etc etc. Its ALL speed of light. For the love of christ I told you that an 8th grade education was required. In your case we'll have to drop that to 3rd ;)
A lot of the transmissions system is wires, relay station, and whatever. Listen to the news, Atlanta Japan......ISS....now tell me you a just playing dumb. And you are educated ? you degrade yourself by playing that dumb.
Why are you dumb enough to think a message would take 5 seconds to go from Houston to Australia when it only takes 0.12 sec for a message to go all the way around the world? Stop stalling. ;)
Why are you playing that dumb that you claim a theoretical speed around the world with the speed of light, when it's a practical speed thru wires - relays - up to a satellite, to another satellite - other relays - wires. This playing dumb make you look immature.
THEORETICAL? LOL The speed of light is a FACT dumbass. The circumference of the Earth is a fact. Any idiot can do the Distance= Velocity x Time calculation. Any idiot of course, except you. ;)
Electricity goes thru wires at the speed of light too. Thats rudimentary 8th grade knowledge. The speed of light is taught in 8th grade as well you retard. Let us know when you make it that far ;)
Anyone can read you are playing dumb, you are making yourself look like an low life type, with all that playing dumb. You even play dumb about your time to the Moon. The theoretical speed of light to Moon must be between 1,21 and 1,35. As I said you got a problem, and you react by playing dumb.
As for the mythical probes please you do not want to start this silly discussion:
US,
Russian,
Japanese,
Indian,
and I think even Chinese,
Have all sent orbiting satellites around the moon.
GPS satellites are around 25,000km and they can take a photo of you and you can read the time on your watch (in case you did not know it...).
Are you saying that those orbiters passing at even lower flights (somtimes lower than 5,000 km) cannot do the same on the moon where there is no atmosphere?
.
I'd love to see the Mythbusters prove the Holocaust™ is not a hoax.
.
IndisputableAttitude 3 weeks ago
@IndisputableAttitude Rofl what
drumline17 3 weeks ago
@drumline17 You heard me. If the Mythbusters can crush the myth that the moon landings were a hoax, then they should crush the myth that the Holocaust™ is a hoax too.
IndisputableAttitude 3 weeks ago
@IndisputableAttitude You don't need to be on mythbusters to do that. In fact, those of us with the reasoning of a dead parrot have already busted that myth
drumline17 3 weeks ago
Anyone believes the "mythbusters" have any credibility watch the video "moon landing hoax - wires footage". "Mythbusters" are overseen by the government.
miitube 1 month ago
@miitube "overseen" which is ANOTHER fear-mongering dork conspiracy, pulled right out of your ass. You cant use dumb conspiracy #1 as proof of dumb conspiracy #2. Thats just making up your story as you go
SpreadingtheMuse 4 weeks ago
let me tell you i have not started to watch the video and i know that the mythbusters will say that the moon walk is real because thats what these guys are paid to do they are debunking us
TheSaltysack 2 months ago
@Seigu007 How about you actually argue your points instead of resorting to silly little insults and trying to degrade your opponent? You could be right, you could be wrong. I don't care, neither does anyone else, solely because you're acting like a small child, and badmouthing other people over the internet. You've lost all respectability.
jackamatyus 4 months ago
Mythbusters are cowards of the highest order. You fucking losers deserve to be slaughtered en masse.
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 And you're making conspiratards look REAL smart too ;) LOL
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Are you a brain dead idiot? … You are grasping for straws, and it’s pitiful to watch you sinking fast.I’d trow you a life raft but why make Darwin,”Who co-incidentally was not a scientist,” proud.
Notice the sympathetic wince?
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 Actually Im a physicist and nuclear worker. Which means I get to look down on GED conspiracy nerds like you and laugh my ass off ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Sarcasm is the effort of a bored mind at wit. Never mind what the internet and everyone else is claiming. Just look at the WTC7 video and tell me what do you think caused that building to fall down so perfectly vertically inside 6.5 seconds (basically at free fall speed)'
Scientific evidence are not "internet rumors" or "conspiracy theories", they are taken from the TV networks on that day.
What do you think caused that building to collapse?
Fire?
Seigu007 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Fabulous--an ignorant fool invoking terms used in formal rhetoric. You know as much about logic as you know about engineering: NOTHING.
None of my assumptions are wrong, as you know, because they are supported by real evidence.
What real evidence do you have for your idiotic fantasies? Still nothing?
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 Yes yes, I'm always so concerned about intellectual judgements made by conspiratard whiners on youtube. *snicker*
Evidence? WHAT evidence? You yelled "mythbusters should die" and were dumb enough to expect a gold medal? Thats only the inarticulate 4th grade reading level we've come to expect. ;)
If you want to argue the moonlanding, then stop foaming at the mouth like a rabid dog. IM THE Physicist here. Ill argue any point anywhere. Bring it on newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Your’e a paper tiger and a fool, and a weak one at that.You are scared and it’s sadly telling by tone of your entire tirade.Perhaps you should consider taking a course in logic as well. I certainly would recommend it.
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 If I'm the paper tiger, why are YOU the one weaseling out like a little girl? Chickenshit ;)
Yes we're all very sad that you couldnt even pretend to argue any science, but its perfectly predictable bluff tactics. Take a REAL good look at the movies I upload junior. Physics, Chemistry, Astronomy, but let me guess, THEY"RE ALL FAKE TOO! My god you've found another conspiracy! LOL
Dont time anymore newb. You had your chance to argue fact and bellyflopped. Now we laugh ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse My sharp whit and the fact that you just had to peek back in here must have you on the defense huh ?You’re simply crying because I’ve put you in a mental wheelchair for life.
Lay off the illegal drugs, you rodent. I heard the toilet scrubbing company you work for, will be doing random tests soon. You might want to be careful.
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 Its more than obvious by now "tiger man" (lol), that you have no facts to argue, let alone prove. I stand by my challenge to debate any hoax point you bring up on any topic, anytime anywhere. Any bluffing or stalling on your part can and will be taken as your admission of failure.
SOME of us dont have to bluff you know ;) And if you stall even one more post without naming even a shred of evidence, I can and will rake you over the coals. Clocks ticking newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Your Slothful Induction is meaningless in the scientific as well as the logic arena.
Maybe you should pick up a physics textbook sometime before running off at the mouth with diarrhea again.
You abandoned intelligence so fast you didn’t even have time to turn around, and just did a Michael Jackson moon walk backwards at breakneck speed. I won, end of story. Now come in here and honor your master.
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 I'm still waiting for you to bring up ANY scientific point to argue. I'm the physics TEACHER remember? I've got more physics books on my shelf than you'll ever hear of. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You have a scientific point? BRING IT ON. Bring it the fuck on. But you cant and wont. Already admitted failure.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@Seigu007 I'm still waiting for you to bring up ANY scientific point to argue. I'm the physics teacher remember? I've got more physics books on my shelf than you'll ever hear of. I've said it before and I'll say it again: You have a scientific point? BRING IT ON. Bring it the fuck on. But you cant and wont. Already admitted failure.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Have you tried the pink-Unicorn forums yet?
Much lighter reading, and much better suited to your logical understanding, and comprehension.
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 Youtube is the better forum for me, for my purpose being here. I'm mostly here on account of the lurkers who never post anything, students and such who come here for curiousity and get inundated with the stupendous ignorance of the hoax crowd. I'm here so they can see hoax retards get confronted, see them bluff and backpedal. I was a teacher for a long time and know exactly where my audience is. Its not backfield forums or classrooms, its social media. RIght here.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Sarcasm is the effort of a bored mind at wit. Never mind what the internet and everyone else is claiming. Just look at the collapse of wtc7 and tell me what do you think caused that building to fall down so perfectly vertically inside 6.5 seconds (basically at free fall speed)'
The collapse of wtc7 cannot be considered an "internet rumor" or "conspiracy theory".
What do you think caused that building to collapse?
Fire?
Seigu007 3 months ago
@Seigu007 I have nowhere near enough respect for your intellect to sapre time for any sarcasm.
Any idiot who brings up WTC 7 are almost to a man amatuer mcjobs without a days education. The more competent and thorough analysis I saw was the computer animation by Popular Mechanics where they showed the entire interior support structure and what parts were damaged. I have seen no refute of that analysis anywhere anytime. DId you even know it existed? I'm betting not.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Thanks stooge. This response does more to destroy your credibility than anything I could have said. Then again, you’ve never had any credibility to begin with monkey so keep climbing up into your tree where you’re safe from the pack. It’s a shame watching superior brainpower such as mine go to waste on a bunch of crazed sycophants.
Seigu007 3 months ago
@Seigu007 So in other words, YOU are exactly the idiot mcjob I was referring to. And you got your widdle feelings hurt ;) LOL
Dude, I'd already written you off as a fruitcake when you brought up 911 on a APOLLO thread. ANY attempt to use retarded conspiracy X as evidence of retarded conspiracy Y proves nothing but how desperate stupid your evidence is for BOTH. Its called making up your story as you go. And you got caught.
Cry me some crocodile tears McNewb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@Seigu007 So in other words YOU ARE exactly the cry-baby mcjob I was referring to, whining about conspiracies to pretend to feel important. And you got your widdle feelings hurt? LOL ;)
Dude you were already written off as a fruitcake when you brought up 911 on an APOLLO thread. Using one retarded conspiracy as proof of ANOTHER retarded conspiracy only proves how desperately stupid your evidence is for BOTH. SOME of us dont need to make up our story as we go
Cry me some crocodile tears ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse I’m laughing all the way to the bank. You’re simply crying because I’ve put you in a mental wheelchair for life.
Lay off the illegal drugs, you rodent. I heard the toilet scrubbing company you work for, will be doing random tests soon. You might want to be careful..
Seigu007 3 months ago
@Seigu007 uh oh, whine whine whine. ;)
Why dont you invent a THIRD conspiracy to explain any your incompetence in proving the previous two? That'll make you look real smart ;)
I'm going to leave you here to stew for a while, I cant wait around for you to charge in here like the offended little boy yelling BUT...BUT...BUT YOU LAUGHED AT ME!
LOL
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse You can’t keep you mind on nothing else. Not even the fact that it’s not a healthy idea to bare one’s heart in front of a group of people whose sole goal is to make fun of you. From this point on, you’ll be referred to as “Cisqo The Dancing Clown.”
Notice the sympathetic wince?
Seigu007 3 months ago
@Seigu007 Well I hope 36 hours was enough time for you to cool off. And not charge in here like a little boy with "But....but....but.... you INSULTED ME AND IM GONNA GET YA!" LOL
Lets see how fast you come charging in here this time. Rest Assured, it'll involve ANOTHER dumb conspiracy, more retarded "fact" that only makes sense to another conspiracy retard.
ALL CONSPIRACIES are retarded. And the more of them you believe, the dumber you get. 911/Apollo slash nerds are living proof ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpreadingtheMuse Your Slothful Induction is meaningless in the scientific as well as the logic arena.
Maybe you should pick up a physics textbook sometime before running off at the mouth with diarrhea again.
You abandoned intelligence so fast you didn’t even have time to turn around, and just did a Michael Jackson moon walk backwards at breakneck speed. I won, end of story. Now come in here and honor your master.
Seigu007 4 months ago
@Seigu007 hes doing the same with me...(scroll down to see) i pity him
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Before you attempt a feeble insult against someone's intelligence, learn enough grammar to put an apostrophe between "I" and "m" in "I'm". I really don't care much about this debate, but both sides would be better off if they avoided ad hominems.
IndisputableAttitude 4 weeks ago
@IndisputableAttitude My insults are NEVER "feeble." ;) And stop whining long enough to learn rudimentary youtube custom. The 500 char limit makes the "I" and "m" difference meaningless. We have limited space and it cant be wasted with a dorky english class. In case you didnt notice, this is not the Queens Parliament, sorry to break it to you ;)
ad hominems are all apollo deniers deserve. They peddle ignorance and paranoia so they're treated as the idiots they are.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse You come across like a moron with your lack of grammar. Your presentation is part of your message. Junk presentation means you have a junk message. I'll be sitting in the executive suite while you (with your poor English skills) will be pushing a mop. Like I said before, on this debate: I have to admit some of the footage looks fishy, like when guy on left stands up like a cable is supporting him. Wow, 500 words isn't a terrible limit, after all.
IndisputableAttitude 4 weeks ago
@IndisputableAttitude Any whine of "grammar" is an obvious stall to avoid discussing fact. Its a predictable waste of time to steer the debate away from science and fact. Its tried every day by intellectual ignorants and you're merely the latest one. ;) This is a SCIENCE debate. Argue anything on that basis or admit you're jsut here to waste everyones time. We've heard it all before by morons who didnt need to retreat quite so fast as you did ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@IndisputableAttitude And I see no cable. And strangely enough, the only people who do are coincidentally already on record as being rabid anti-NASA. Fishy ;)
Funny though, I actually took the time to actually ask a professional theater worker, who informed me that wire work that sophisticated did not exist in the 60's. But we have retards like you who watch 30 sec of the Matrix and pretend that makes you an expert. Dont make dumb assumptions about what you're a newb in
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse I don't see a cable either, just the appearance of a hidden one. Is it possible that the landings were real, but the footage was fake? Also, "don't" is spelled with an apostrophe, so please improve your writing.
IndisputableAttitude 3 weeks ago
@IndisputableAttitude 'dont' is spelled however it gets across. This isnt the Queens Parliment you know. We only have 500 char and Im not wasting even one on an artsy fartsy apostrophe. Read it my way or leave.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse I'm going to stay here, but ignore your drivel. Exchanging ideas with a moron will damage my intellectual sharpness. If a professional chess player wants to improve his game, he doesn't play chess with beginners. So too do I not want to discuss something with a poorly educated imbecile such as you, as your stupidity might be contagious. Good day, and have fun talking to people stupid enough to engage you.
IndisputableAttitude 3 weeks ago
This is the start of an article I found today: Remarkable new images of the Apollo landing sites on the Moon have been released by Nasa.
The pictures clearly show the hardware left on the lunar surface by American astronauts in the 1960s and 70s, including Apollo 17's "Moon buggy"
ArgotMay 4 months ago
if anyone on earth would be in a position to call the moon landings fake...it would be the russian government! and guess what, russians, with all that space technology and the fact that losing the space battle to Americans really pissed them off...HAVE NEVER QUESTIONED THE VERACITY OF THE MOON LANDINGS! thats the biggest proof of them all.
poralentierno 6 months ago 11
@poralentierno You make a very good point. There is no way to prove anything beyond doubt because humans are doubtful, but it is reasonable to believe that the moon landings did happen.
mrturtlebobington 4 months ago
@poralentierno the americans spent billions of money to invent a pen that could write in zero gravity(cos the ink and all) the russians used a PENCIL :))))))))))
Stealthomas 2 months ago
@Stealthomas NASA uses a pen for PERMANENT record-keeping. Whats the point in making documents that can just be erased at will? The pencil just let the Russians fudge their numbers. We didnt even know how many cosmonauts died in their programs until 30-40 years later.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse the point in me saying that was to point out that sometimes we think too much and waste time n resources when the solution is simple and already there
Stealthomas 4 weeks ago
@Stealthomas yeah the "pencil" thing has been used as a huge joke at NASA's expense. But my point was that people skip to the dumb joke without ever thinking that just maybe NASA had a master plan that they never bothered to find out. Its easy to joke, but harder to take the time to learn.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse a pencil works.. and u say that NASA made the pen so that it wont be erased? but.. NASA can just destroy the paper or whatever they wrote it on or keep it from public eye... therefore your argument is invalid
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas Sure they could destroy the paper. But using a pen at least gives the illusion that they give a damn about responsible record keeping. I've worked in a few government labs, and using a pen for all documents is mandatory. Using a pencil is the fast track to disciplinary action
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse NASA transmits back to the launch center every now and then and the shuttle is equipped with state of the art sensors and such so.. officials could check on the astronauts(which were CAREFULLY selected)if they wanted too... just admit it the americans thought too much and invented that pen.. and the funds could have been used to find a cure for cancer or another illness/to create more jobs or in another project.
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas I actually WORK in a gov lab. Pens are required cause they're permanent and easier to read, to name only two reasons. "thinking too hard" is a cliche by armchair bureaucrats who think correctly spelling "NASA" makes them an expert on space travel. You need to admit that there are things you dont know.
And come the hell on. If a few million dollars would have cured cancer then it would have been cured 50 years ago.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse hmm... in the past EVERYBODY thought flying would be impossible so the wright brothers were on they on and they did it and now we are able to travel into space so um.. yea curing cancer is possible if you do it right and yes you will get it right trial and error the money used in the "space pen" could go a long way and you yourself is a "armchair bureaucrat" pencils were not used because broken leads and the graphite dust posed a problem in space the russians used greased lead
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas Of course we'll cure cancer. But it was stupid for you to infer that the primary reason we havent is because NASA wants pens on its space shuttles. It was a moronic stretch and you know it.
Since I actually work in the field, do a job in the trenches of laboratory employ, I'm no more "armchair" than shallow NASA detractors can claim to be rocket scientists.
If you knew about the graphite dust, whats there to argue about?
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse um russians used GREASED leads? and the graphite dust and broken leads in space were the main reasons why they made the pen but greased leads easily solved the problems if you didnt know that then you are just a idiot plucking nonsense from thin air and expecting to get gold? if you are UNABLE to accept REASONING then u might as well shut ur mouth cos its ridiculous
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas But if you use a pen, you DONT NEED to solve any problem of graphite dust, now do you? Duh ;)
Hows that for "reasoning?" Dumbass ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse sure i am the "dumbass" you have such a excellent logic spend millions inventing pen(millions which could be put to better use like how to go to mars and stuff) is better than using greased lead hmm "tingtingting" we have a winner "facepalm"
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas Somehow "greased lead" in a zero g clean environment doenst make me feel any better. ;)
Good thing we have youtard wannabes to tell NASA how much smarter they are than people who actually work for a living
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse hmm... are you are a wannabe troll? cos you comment on every other person comments too and you try to annoy thm... if u want to be a troll pls u are doing a lousy job and you should get a paying job cos with this kind of retarded attitude wouldnt get you far... unless you are just a keyboard warrior? or this is your alter ego to make yourself feel better... i understand you were bullied as a kid and mayb now still so doing this "helps"you feel better its alright :)
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas I comment on every comment where theres a blatant ignorance of fact. That means with hoax twats like you I'm very busy indeed ;)
If its too much for your widdle feelings, feel free to leave ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse since you did not know that and you can proudly mock others when you yourself oversaw that detail...you are in no position to correct others..good day
Stealthomas 3 weeks ago
@Stealthomas I said "To name only two reasons" remember? Its right there in my post. So try again. Since you yourself gave a reason of your own, there's no point denying that NASA did the right thing by insisting pens
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked.
politicalforum (dot) com/moon-landing/190138-apollo-moon-missions-were-faked-studio (dot) html
Cosmored 6 months ago
61 teen girls were forced to say that the moon landing was a hoax just so they could see Justin Bieber
somethingweirdish 6 months ago
As a Brit I sat up all night to watch this fantastic history making moon landing. I feel that it denegrates the men and women involved in this to say it didn't happen.For it not to happen as some people say it would mean all the "people" involved in the hoax would have to keep silent (sorry thats not going to happen) someone would talk & they have not.America put a man on the moon first get over it.
MrHeadrocker50 6 months ago 16
@MrHeadrocker50 here ! here ! I watched this on TV as a kid in the 60's too ! what a great time to grow up in !
it is unfortunate that those with limited ability to learn will question even eyewitness testimony in their zeal to undermine any anomaly they dont readily understand. for every one of the inconsistencies noted there is a logical explanation. the USSR could have gotten some serious mileage out of a hoax claim and they never said a word. experts agree and the infantile minded disbelieve
1MtnBoy 5 months ago
@MrHeadrocker50 not just that the main dude saying it was a hoax is a complete moron, and his understanding is so uneducated he brings down the other moon hoaxer theorist with his pure stupidity. Watch my moon walk vid to see some points, that were failed to be made to that idiot.
LittleZappey 5 months ago
Transformers got there first!
Jamac007 6 months ago
ofc ppl went to the moon! Mickey Mouse, Tom & Jerry...you name it.
000WishMaster000 6 months ago
Comment removed
littlehoihoi 7 months ago
Comment removed
davidleegoth 7 months ago
@davidleegoth completely impossible? Did you really just rule out decades worth of research, development and innovation in spite of overwhelming evidence simply because recording technology didn't parallel the technological advances of aero/astrodynamic engineering?
Such fucking willful ignorance.
blindbubba 7 months ago
Comment removed
davidleegoth 7 months ago
@davidleegoth Just one word, of a reasonably sized paragraph - none of which you actually responded to. If you are completely thrown off your game by a single swear word, then you are either a sadly sheltered puritan, or just using it as an excuse to hide your ignorance (the more likely option)
blindbubba 7 months ago
@davidleegoth So, I suppose ISS, Mir, ICBMs, telecommunications satellites, GPS, TV satellites, every kind of guided missile currently in use by any military of sufficient technological advancement and funding, and so much more, all of that is part of some massively elaborate hoax, then?
Habbadax 7 months ago
Comment removed
davidleegoth 7 months ago
@davidleegoth These photographic experts were unaware of astronomical albedo; ie the reflective qualities of the uneven lunar surface. They can't, obviously, be an expert in every field.
We know the lunar surface reflects quite a bit of light; as can be seen on clear nights when moonlight illuminates the Earth. This is the 'artificial' light that has misled some people.
krisdevalle 6 months ago 2
i thought this was the dance
justinpiu 7 months ago
this prove it, they did not go to the moon, they filmed the fake moon landing in a giant plane!!! omgz its so clear now, those basterds!
TheTrueJBV3737 7 months ago
@TheTrueJBV3737 Either you are the biggest moron to have ever lived, or wonderfully sarcastic.
Laurelindo 6 months ago
@Laurelindo Cannot one be both of those? XD
TheTrueJBV3737 6 months ago
couldn't the faked moonlanding have been filmed on an airplane such as this one?
87mrks 7 months ago
@87mrks No, because you only get about 20 seconds of weightlessness at a time. There are longer sequences of men on the moon, and in much larger areas.
krisdevalle 7 months ago
@87mrks
There is finite space inside that plane. You can't build an entire film set that size in that plane and record hours of footage with no breaks.
Draknfyre 7 months ago
BOLLOCKS
Chev4206 7 months ago
lol fucking lol next will be mars landings fake and all u bitches will fool for it :),the joke of man spending 12 months on earth to simulate the journey,fucking dumb fuckers lol
kevinstuartfr0st 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The mythbusters guys ignited a half a ton of thermite to try to cut a car in half. See how it turned out in my video:
Incendiary Experiments
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
9/11 was an inside job.. mythbusters is a piece of shit.
sanluisskywatch 7 months ago
@sanluisskywatch
"inside job" = newb whine. THANK GOD we have illterate youtards to tell us these things. I almost listened to a professional engineer who actually works for a living
SpreadingtheMuse 7 months ago
I have to disagree with these guys on this. There is way too much evidence to prove the moon landing was faked. NASA has money and they could have easily paid Mythbusters to do it exactly this way.
sedwardlawson 8 months ago
@sedwardlawson Said by a stereotypical conspiracy nutjob.
WGBraves24 7 months ago
@sedwardlawson, oh you mean those brainwashing conspiracy video's who uses fabricated evidence, putting things out of context, twist facts and then call it "evidence".
n00baday 7 months ago
HEY if you guys wanna try you gotta reserve it AND it 5 grans
EpicPwnge 8 months ago
58 people are insistant little brats and refuse to accept this as evidence.
HLiNaKRbCsFrUun 8 months ago
Its almost unnecessary for us Pro-moonwalker types to argue with the moon landing skeptics. Clearly they are to stubborn to be proven wrong, and they feel some sort of accomplishment " Knowing " so much that us " brainwashed sheeple " don't about the moon landings. I'm sorry for them that they can't accept the fact that mankind ( so be it if it was Americans) were able to actually journey to, and land on another heavenly body. Its truly a beautiful thing that we made it to the moon.
GladiusDidimus 8 months ago
WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tsoto247 8 months ago
Nice scripted conversation! HAHA!
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
ok i was starting to wonder if we really did go but now i believe.
SkatePunk7 9 months ago
i hate scripted conversations.... especially when they cant at all make it convincing
Dinoboy05 9 months ago
um.. maybe the original recordings were done in a large plane doing parabolas.
mayapurcandra108 9 months ago
@mayapurcandra108
Unfortunately that has a problem.
You can only get 20 seconds or so of reduced gravity in the plane and the original recordings were hours long.
ytmoog 9 months ago
@ytmoog ah.. ty for that...
mayapurcandra108 9 months ago
@ytmoog They could have made different cuts in the video editing.
Xothologle 9 months ago
@Xothologle
Here is a section of a longer bit showing some nice reduced gravity on the dust as one astronaut digs:
watch?v=sk5GiF_mX5w
No cuts just a continuous transmission....
ytmoog 9 months ago
@mayapurcandra108 They were filmed with wires AND slow motion. Take Adam's wire jump and slow it down to 67% and render it as one clip with John Young's jump. It will be the same.
yesiamawizardjonny 8 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny Sure, they may be the same. At the same time, interacting gravity the same as the Moon produces the same results.
AuraHero 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
adam and jamie love to shove each others dicks into each other dicks, they shoulkd be called pith busters. fucking hokmos
MrToiletface 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People are still questioning if man went to the moon? Really? They must be the same ones who believe in pyramid power...
Stardestroyer212 9 months ago 39
@Stardestroyer212 LOL Don't you know, the aliens that built the pyramids also helped NASA fake the moon landings. Here is what happened. The aliens traveled across the universe, built the pyramids but their alternator went out and they couldn't get home so the gov built area 51 for the aliens to study film resulting in them being able to help fake the moon landings. They also gave us computer technology so rich guys can take over the world.lol WoW I could be a conspiracy nut, what do you think?
shananagans5 9 months ago 2
@Stardestroyer212 what is pyramid power?
SkatePunk7 9 months ago
@Stardestroyer212 The goverment is illuminati!!
jonov123 8 months ago
@Stardestroyer212 -Not if man went to The Moon - Just if the first American (U.S.A.) moon landing was real.
saints360row 6 months ago
@Stardestroyer212
I am more than questioning it.
I say that it makes no doubt it is a fraud.
hunchbacked 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
people are just jealous that WE got their first XD
hotpocketpoison 9 months ago 14
@hotpocketpoison LOL THAT IS ALL YOU DO ON YOUTUBE ISNT IT REINFORCE THE LIE LOL LOL TO MANY ARE WAKING UP YOUR FIGHTING A LOOSING BATTLE :)
kevinstuartfr0st 9 months ago
@kevinstuartfr0st are you stalking my posts...wow
hotpocketpoison 9 months ago
@hotpocketpoison lol not only stupid but crazy as well lol no wonder you STILL thing man went to the moon :) ;) it is my video post on that page,but yes i did look at your empty profile,to see that you have nothing,and that didnt supprise me :).is you do want to wake up let me know.have a good day
kevinstuartfr0st 9 months ago
@hotpocketpoison We got their what?
nexus1g 8 months ago
@hotpocketpoison you?? you are expandable fat american hope mythbusters die
koneko1991 8 months ago
@hotpocketpoison You can't even use the right 'there'... Idiot.
mozzywozzy 8 months ago
@hotpocketpoison and what did YOU get from it, billions of dollars wasted just to prove to the soviet union that you have the tech? korolev was 100000000x more skilled than braun, if he would allow himself to be treated instead of working on the vostok you would see a soviet flag on the moon. and no, im not pro-soviet, i just dont like when americans boast of how skillful they are coz they went to the moon, and honestly, i didnt see it, i dont believe it.
ChromaTutsVEVO 8 months ago
@ChromaTutsVEVO
Russians don't exactly have the greatest record of safety. There's the old joke that NASA spent millions to develop a pen that worked in space, and the Soviets just used a pencil. Which they did, and didn't spend millions on a pen. Pencil bits can get behind equipment, short it out, and start a fire.
Russian cares NOTHING for it's soldiers, or people in this line of work. There's been rumors for years that dozens of their cosmonauts died in tests. with no acknowledgement
Draknfyre 7 months ago
@ChromaTutsVEVO
of them existing. Russia might have gotten to the moon, costing hundreds of human lives in the process. And they wouldn't have acknowledged any of them.
And if seeing something is the only way you believe in it, I guess all the technology you benefit from doesn't exist, right? You didn't see them deploy the GPS satellites, right? You enjoying that technology? The US Government placed the original GPS satellites in orbit.
I don't think you are pro-Soviet, but are anti-American
Draknfyre 7 months ago
@hotpocketpoison there ;)
electriceye667 7 months ago
@hotpocketpoison 'there'
columnsx 7 months ago
@hotpocketpoison We? Who is we? You most certainly haven't been there.
EbiTron 6 months ago
@EbiTron WE as in the USA!!!
hotpocketpoison 6 months ago
@hotpocketpoison Yea, that's a great 'we'. I bet you weren't even born then.
EbiTron 6 months ago
i love their fake conversations
gwk326 9 months ago
still a hoax
TwitchandFirefly 10 months ago
@TwitchandFirefly IT'S REAL TO ME DAMMIT!!!
AuraHero 8 months ago
Hey Myth buster dumbo, they are making movies which exactly look like landings ... we dont need your bustin foolishness
charlieking100 10 months ago
@charlieking100
yea they can do that today but could they do that 50 years ago?
TheDarkNobleOne 10 months ago
@TheDarkNobleOne Point! :)
charlieking100 10 months ago
@TheDarkNobleOne But I don't get one thing. Why is there not a single Satellite which can take photographs of the landing area with high resolution? Why?
Why is even google earth not having the real deal in google moon
charlieking100 10 months ago
@charlieking100 I usually get this answer regarding the photographs of the landing area with high resolution:
"Well cameras are not built to take those kind of pictures"
That's all they have!! haha
saltydog78 10 months ago
@charlieking100
There is, and the LRO did so. Of all the landing sites...
Here are some of the images of the Apollo 11 landing site taken last year.
watch?v=ul87ieOZpaQ
It shows nice detail and the shadows cast at different times of lunar day shows a lot of detail as well.
This what you are after?
And I am sure google will eventually use the LRO data over the older data they currently use.
ytmoog 9 months ago
@ytmoog Yes!! Thanks dude!! I was not used to be like this. I grew up eating Cereal and watching Apollo program documentaries my Father and mother brought for me. I grew up literally "Breathing" science. One day I saw the skeptics video and was astonished and out of my mind. I really really believed and knew that they went up there to the moon, but somewhere i had a doubt and now I am clear again like when I was a kid! .. All i wanted was these pictures. Thanks dude!
charlieking100 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hehe! I made a parody myself, this time of Mythbusters!
Check it out!
/watch?v=7vy2ddF-O24
PerfectChaos666Tim 10 months ago
Mythbusters=dumbest "proof" I have ever seen. The moon landings were fake, stop spreading propaganda and being a dumbass
yesiamawizardjonny 10 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny Test wasn't dumb, You simply can't comprehend it. Regardless, just like all the other evidence that proves we went there, along with the 'evidence' that proves we didnt, is questionable on both sides.
I believe its real. Recent detailed imaging of moon (by japan) shows the landing site & terrain displays images that are virtually identical to the images taken by Apollo.
xinecallaw 9 months ago
Radio signal bouncers of the moon say that it takes 2,56 second. Houston over California.....down under, based on the delay you hear when they call, would be around 8 - 10 seconds, even more.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
You misread that. Thats 2.5 sec TOTAL, not one way.
The moon is 300,000,000 meters away. Light travels at 300,000,000 meters a sec. Easy math. It takes one sec to get there and one sec to get back. 2.0 + TOTAL.
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Yes, 2,56 sec both way, does it not have to go both ways ?. Do you have to play dumb ?. Then both ways from Houston over California.....down under....Communication between ISS and someone on Earth is between 3 sec and 8 sec, based on what's is videoed on YouTube. So don't you think it's far above between Houston and the Moon.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
The 8 second is ridiculous. There's no distance on Earth that takes more than a fraction of a sec to get to. You can talk to someone in Australia and he'll hear your voice on the line BEFORE someone across the room will. Thats how fast light is. Going to the moon and back is the only delay of any kind. And that only adds one sec per direction.
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
That's so denying the reality only an religious Moon hosxster can do.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
LOL if you were too stupid to know the speed of light, which I learned in the 3rd grade, then its your fault for being an ignorant, not mine for pointing it out.
REAL "truth," like you claim to cherish but dont, would admit like an adult that you screwed up.
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
You are playing dumb, living in denial of the reality. Cover yourself under playing dumb. You are a disgusting type. You Moon hoaxsters playing dumb is pathetic.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
You're running out of talking points little boy ;)
Degenerating into "you...you....you STUPID MAN" is the last act of the whiny 3rd grader ;)
You were too stupid to check the speed of light. You were too stupid to check the Earth/moon distance. You lose ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Little boy, it's you there are running out of talking points, that's why you play dumb, playing dumb is the only talking point you have. And that proves you are an immature Moon hoaxster, there have a problem with your fairy tale.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
How come you didnt know it only takes ONE sec for light to get to the moon? Hmm? I learned that in the 8th grade. Looks like you flunked. Loser ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Anyone can look up and calculate a theoretical travel time to the Moon. I said the time it takes to bounce off a signal is 2,56 sec. then you have to include time from Houston, and you know that, that's why you play dumb. Are you so immature that you don't understand you degrade yourself and humans by playing dumb......dumb smart.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
HOW MUCH time from Houston? Since you were too stupid too look up yourself how long it takes light to get to the moon how can we trust you here? You blindly believed a dork webpage like a newb and got burned for it ;) Next time do your OWN research little boy.
And guess what dufus, I just did the math. The Earth is 40,000,000 meters around. That means light can go ALL THE WAY AROUND in 0.12 sec.
NINE TIMES in one second.
You still want to pretend not to be a retard?
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Why do you keep playing dumb ? I blindly believed a radio Moon bouncing website, is 2,56 sec. wrong then ? I guess you just play dumb, that's what you are good at. Cant you see you degrade yourself by this playing dumb.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
You started this stupidity saying that it was EIGHT seconds or more. Not only did you blindly believe that without the slightest effort to think for yourself, you still havent even admitted its dead wrong.
Lets make sure we're on the same page: Was saying we needed to have an eight second delay (when the moon is only 2 seconds round trip), wrong and in error?
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Still playing dumb, it's still 2,56 seconds, and still it's from Houston over california....down under. The delay in the ISS communication is between 3 - 8 seconds. Can't you come up with something other, than playing dumb.....no, I know you can't, playing dumb is all you got left.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
You're still ignoring 8th grade science ;) I proved to you light can travel all the way around the world in 0.12 sec. Not 3. Not 8. How can you pull 8 sec out of your ass when it only takes 0.12? Is that calculation wrong? PROVE it. I asked you to explain exactly how long it took a message to get from Houston to California and you flunked.
Can you provide ANY hard facts? Do you even remember what the speed of light is? Of course not. You have no newb idea.
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Do you have to keep playing dumb. Sound does not move with the speed of light in a transmission system, does it. It does not in the news, it does not from the ISS. Don't you think you degrade yourself by this playing dumb.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
ARE YOU AN IDIOT? Well... yes ;) Sound via radio waves moves at THE SPEED OF LIGHT! What kind of retard doesnt know that???
Well, other than you ;)
Radio waves, microwaves, visible light, fiber optics, electricity etc etc etc. Its ALL speed of light. For the love of christ I told you that an 8th grade education was required. In your case we'll have to drop that to 3rd ;)
Please tell me you're just a joke
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
A lot of the transmissions system is wires, relay station, and whatever. Listen to the news, Atlanta Japan......ISS....now tell me you a just playing dumb. And you are educated ? you degrade yourself by playing that dumb.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
Why are you dumb enough to think a message would take 5 seconds to go from Houston to Australia when it only takes 0.12 sec for a message to go all the way around the world? Stop stalling. ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Why are you playing that dumb that you claim a theoretical speed around the world with the speed of light, when it's a practical speed thru wires - relays - up to a satellite, to another satellite - other relays - wires. This playing dumb make you look immature.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
THEORETICAL? LOL The speed of light is a FACT dumbass. The circumference of the Earth is a fact. Any idiot can do the Distance= Velocity x Time calculation. Any idiot of course, except you. ;)
Electricity goes thru wires at the speed of light too. Thats rudimentary 8th grade knowledge. The speed of light is taught in 8th grade as well you retard. Let us know when you make it that far ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
You keep playing dumb, it's all you got left, playing dumb. By the way in 69 it was copper wire. Keep playing dumb, it shows what type you are.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
@kennjohnsen
Its telling how every post of yours has the word "dumb" in it ;)
You didnt know the speed of light.
You didnt know light takes only 1 sec to get to the moon
You didnt know light travels around the Earth in 0.12 sec
You didnt know radio waves move at the speed of light
You didnt know electricity moves at the speed of light
THANK GOD the moon "hoax" is so well defended. I was worried you were going to make them all look like 3rd grade idiots ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 10 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
Anyone can read you are playing dumb, you are making yourself look like an low life type, with all that playing dumb. You even play dumb about your time to the Moon. The theoretical speed of light to Moon must be between 1,21 and 1,35. As I said you got a problem, and you react by playing dumb.
kennjohnsen 10 months ago
Sweet! Nuff said.
tekkiangel 10 months ago
As for the mythical probes please you do not want to start this silly discussion:
US,
Russian,
Japanese,
Indian,
and I think even Chinese,
Have all sent orbiting satellites around the moon.
GPS satellites are around 25,000km and they can take a photo of you and you can read the time on your watch (in case you did not know it...).
Are you saying that those orbiters passing at even lower flights (somtimes lower than 5,000 km) cannot do the same on the moon where there is no atmosphere?
notgodsemigod 10 months ago