Very nice! Tight spike, a little sloppy on the burn (not sure about how well your oxidizer is mixing) but I saw a half dozen consistent diamonds in the flow. Very good. I think it would have been easier to judge on film if filmed at dusk with less back lighting. Your fuel is burning quite bright yellow- * lower temp indicator but that does NOT mean less thrust!
As for rockets, we already experimented hydrogen on dozen of flights. Why we still dont have methane as a propellant is unknown to me. Its more efficient, can either be more efficient or deliver more power.
And it doesnt require cryogenic fuels as it is cryogenic in itself under pressure.
spoon the ingredients gets mixed. This same principle works in the formation of a born solar system. All kinds of ingredients clumb together (like rock, iron, other minerals, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and H2o obviously.
All those materials were mixed in the accretion soup in the formation of the early solar system.
That means that any any any planet must and will have water, whether its frozen liquid or air.
Your a naive hypocriet religious moron just to question that already fact.
But it drives us to put estimates or barriers on things we cant further look into. You know, thats perfectly fine with me. But its ridiculous and your a total brain defected mongol to even consider saying, earth is the only example of a planet with water, and theres one subject of people interpreting that as it was said. ANd theres a subject of people that take it as, this is all there is.
Gravity is like a cup of soup.
It has dozen of ingredients to it. And when your swirl it around with your
planets and moons likely havent because we cant see it. Hello!!!!
90% of the visible matter in our universe is hydrogen. And you only need 1 spark and some oxygen to light it.
And somehow its assumable to say the earth is the only planet in the universe that has large quantities of liquid water. Im not sure about the reasoning of many people on this planet. But i find saying that as a fact far more further fetched then saying aliens exists in large quantities.
@nivekevinutz water. When hydrogen (H) combines with oxygen (O) it burns (oxidises). Two hydrogen atoms (H2) combine with one oxygen atom (O) to form H2O, water.
nice test..... infact, a glorious achievment, but on a more immature note, ten bicks says you won't grab the tip when it's glowing ;) I do admire the consistancy of the burn. well done indeed.
video is good . but the casing started to over heat to red hot at 33 seconds and was creaping up till it neared the bulbus area or wider part in it. I think the materials need to be re done just to be safe. other wise it could blow glad you saw it turning that way. Not fully safe TBH! good try.
not bad at all, you could put a small rocket into space with about 3 of those (dont launch from your back yard check with faa regulations) anywho there are to problems with this thou the first is your combustion is melting the opining of your engine and combined with friction in the atmosphere it will melt you may want to strenghtin that part or have a cooling system to keep down that heat,
the secound is it likes you dont have a nozel, its called a warner von braun nozel but this could fly
thats what i thought, it still dosent look like much of an expansion ratio. it all depends what pressure your getting in the chamber. but then ive not done any rocket calcs for at least 10 years
nice burn, nice machining, nice all around. When the spece program has failed us because of exorbitant spening, I hope that one day people will be smart enough to get off this rock. Taking calculated risks is what did it for appalo missions so lets give people a little breathing room on the regulations. We might just find a more efficient means.
I am building a 200 pound thrust engine, similar to that one, ablative with graphite, but a 4 second burn, in a flying rocket, and using nitromethane and nitrous oxide, which gives about a 1:1 volume ratio. What do you think of that propellant combo?
Be very cautious of how you pump the nitromethane as it can detonate when put under pressure is. It took 40 years to find out nitro can detonate under pressure though possibility increases with temperature. When they did it was catasrpophic. Research, research, research.
Yes, I am aware of it, that is why I wonder, if i use a variant of RC model fuel, which has a few percent each of oil and alcohol, if that would make it less prone to detonate under pressure. Do drag racers use it at 100 percent or is it cut just a bit?
Drag racing used to be 90-95% nitro, they have been mandated to lower the nitro in the interest of cost savings. I will not dispense information which I feel is accurate as I am not the expert, I would only tell you to contact a Nitro fuel supplier like VP fuels and ask their experts your questions. They have the experience.
This has been flagged as spam show
Very nice! Tight spike, a little sloppy on the burn (not sure about how well your oxidizer is mixing) but I saw a half dozen consistent diamonds in the flow. Very good. I think it would have been easier to judge on film if filmed at dusk with less back lighting. Your fuel is burning quite bright yellow- * lower temp indicator but that does NOT mean less thrust!
bamboo4tameshigiri 2 months ago in playlist More videos from teambnova
You should put copper tubing around the nozzle, hook it to a compressor and tank of liquid nitrogen. You need to pull the heat away from that nozzle.
albyva 3 months ago
As for rockets, we already experimented hydrogen on dozen of flights. Why we still dont have methane as a propellant is unknown to me. Its more efficient, can either be more efficient or deliver more power.
And it doesnt require cryogenic fuels as it is cryogenic in itself under pressure.
Armigo91 7 months ago
spoon the ingredients gets mixed. This same principle works in the formation of a born solar system. All kinds of ingredients clumb together (like rock, iron, other minerals, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, and H2o obviously.
All those materials were mixed in the accretion soup in the formation of the early solar system.
That means that any any any planet must and will have water, whether its frozen liquid or air.
Your a naive hypocriet religious moron just to question that already fact.
Armigo91 7 months ago
But it drives us to put estimates or barriers on things we cant further look into. You know, thats perfectly fine with me. But its ridiculous and your a total brain defected mongol to even consider saying, earth is the only example of a planet with water, and theres one subject of people interpreting that as it was said. ANd theres a subject of people that take it as, this is all there is.
Gravity is like a cup of soup.
It has dozen of ingredients to it. And when your swirl it around with your
Armigo91 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now lick it :P
n00baday 7 months ago
what does hydrogen turn into when you burn it?
nivekevinutz 7 months ago
@nivekevinutz
Im not gonna give you the direct answer. But last time i checked the universe was full of sparks and hydrogen.
But somehow mysteriously, perhaps with help of * kough* god.
All water and theirfore life tht exists is here centered on earth.
We are actual raising the question whether water exists on the moon or mars. Which is obvious logic, then why are the stars burning nuclear fusion?
So what we have said for decades and many still do. We see liquid water on earth, but all other
Armigo91 7 months ago
planets and moons likely havent because we cant see it. Hello!!!!
90% of the visible matter in our universe is hydrogen. And you only need 1 spark and some oxygen to light it.
And somehow its assumable to say the earth is the only planet in the universe that has large quantities of liquid water. Im not sure about the reasoning of many people on this planet. But i find saying that as a fact far more further fetched then saying aliens exists in large quantities.
AFter all its not my reasoning
Armigo91 7 months ago
@nivekevinutz water. When hydrogen (H) combines with oxygen (O) it burns (oxidises). Two hydrogen atoms (H2) combine with one oxygen atom (O) to form H2O, water.
crankybloke 5 months ago
wouldn't want to walk to walk behind that!
concordatthefort 8 months ago
i wanna touch it
MrJavier0103 9 months ago
How much longer can you burn it before the nozzle fails? Is it a graphite nozzle? What sort of fuel are you using?
Meanie010 10 months ago
wow, impressive, what's the thrust in lbs? also about how many feet would that launch your rocket
drewnickel 11 months ago
The perfect sword!
halfcastdeluxe 11 months ago
lol wow...the dust bellow the rocket nozzle
OnnomonnomonnO 11 months ago
and you forgot the marshmellos...what a shame
MrCodester1 1 year ago
the next generation of cigarette lighter.
tracemaster100 1 year ago
Where can i get a chunk of graphite that big??
rhelbren 1 year ago
nice test..... infact, a glorious achievment, but on a more immature note, ten bicks says you won't grab the tip when it's glowing ;) I do admire the consistancy of the burn. well done indeed.
TacticalShutdown 1 year ago
Shock diamonds!
hunterhalo2 1 year ago
the gravel below is steaming lol
minato784 1 year ago
dude! look at the rings in it!
motordude1234 1 year ago
May I ask what the thrust was?
themainproblem 1 year ago
Sustainer engine?
Stover36 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thats how many has thrust?
gityozene 1 year ago
how much thrust does it produce?
TheeOz 1 year ago
101 sec thats more than great to pat the earth g-ground pull
stewartabesha 1 year ago
Are there impurities in the fuel? It's hesitating!
vexviper 1 year ago
propellants ?
roboticmehdi 1 year ago
damn when you fire it do you risk hitting low flying aircrafts?
diapysik 1 year ago
whose up for barbecue
toribasher123 1 year ago
VERY NICE !
1BustedMyth 1 year ago
DAMN!
derekroolz 1 year ago
video is good . but the casing started to over heat to red hot at 33 seconds and was creaping up till it neared the bulbus area or wider part in it. I think the materials need to be re done just to be safe. other wise it could blow glad you saw it turning that way. Not fully safe TBH! good try.
darian1968 1 year ago
not bad at all, you could put a small rocket into space with about 3 of those (dont launch from your back yard check with faa regulations) anywho there are to problems with this thou the first is your combustion is melting the opining of your engine and combined with friction in the atmosphere it will melt you may want to strenghtin that part or have a cooling system to keep down that heat,
the secound is it likes you dont have a nozel, its called a warner von braun nozel but this could fly
emerychandler 1 year ago
Never walk in front on this mother crucker.
gblastoff 1 year ago
how big is it?
elliotmotoX 1 year ago
why isnt it very loud?
smokescreenninja 2 years ago
camera can't grasp the full noise level
yop911 1 year ago
IMA FIRIN MAH LAZAH!!!!
Xxero0 2 years ago
lol if you in space w/ that...it would be an awesome ride!!!!
XxstryaexX1 2 years ago
The latest test is now posted (Video response above) youtube (dot) com /watch?v=NyFpJ7zsUiA
teambnova 2 years ago
I can't help but stare at the rocks on the ground.....
MrAnon95 2 years ago 15
No thrust information and although it worked well for 101 sec the white nozzle would fail if run to much longer.
SuperTrooper9000 2 years ago
You must not have seen the the latest hot fires.
teambnova 2 years ago
@SuperTrooper9000 If the rocket was moving through the air at high speed wouldn't the white hot nozzle keep cool?
noreplyism 4 months ago
WOW what fuel are u using?
caleamabob 2 years ago
Propane/Nitrous oxide
douro20 2 years ago
it was white hot!!!!!!!!!!!!
miniatureme95 2 years ago
You think that's white hot? Check out our latest test (Video response above) youtube (dot) com /watch?v=NyFpJ7zsUiA
teambnova 2 years ago
@teambnova maybe not but it was getting there
miniatureme95 1 year ago
why is there no divergent part of the nozzle, or is there a smaller throat further inside the chamber
waspsnest 2 years ago
The interior profile is not the same as the exterior profile.
teambnova 2 years ago
thats what i thought, it still dosent look like much of an expansion ratio. it all depends what pressure your getting in the chamber. but then ive not done any rocket calcs for at least 10 years
waspsnest 2 years ago
can i put one of these in my estes model rocket?
intheringboxing 2 years ago
wow!!
how much thrust can this thing provide?
fmeriqui 2 years ago
300 lbs.
teambnova 2 years ago
cool!!
fmeriqui 2 years ago
OOOOH
elite335 2 years ago
just shy of a million Newton*Seconds
RoboTekno 2 years ago
What is the chamber pressure and the specific impulse, pray tell.
johnbell58 2 years ago
That's proprietary information.
teambnova 2 years ago
nice burn, nice machining, nice all around. When the spece program has failed us because of exorbitant spening, I hope that one day people will be smart enough to get off this rock. Taking calculated risks is what did it for appalo missions so lets give people a little breathing room on the regulations. We might just find a more efficient means.
shizzle5150 2 years ago 5
I count 5 - 7 diamonds, good job!
HavazikFerric 2 years ago 3
REALLY HIGH!!!!!!!!
mahoo6767 2 years ago
jesus how high would that have gone
hziggles 2 years ago
I am building a 200 pound thrust engine, similar to that one, ablative with graphite, but a 4 second burn, in a flying rocket, and using nitromethane and nitrous oxide, which gives about a 1:1 volume ratio. What do you think of that propellant combo?
johnbell58 3 years ago
we have no experience with those materials
teambnova 3 years ago
Be very cautious of how you pump the nitromethane as it can detonate when put under pressure is. It took 40 years to find out nitro can detonate under pressure though possibility increases with temperature. When they did it was catasrpophic. Research, research, research.
VooDooRocketry 3 years ago 3
Yes, I am aware of it, that is why I wonder, if i use a variant of RC model fuel, which has a few percent each of oil and alcohol, if that would make it less prone to detonate under pressure. Do drag racers use it at 100 percent or is it cut just a bit?
johnbell58 3 years ago
Drag racing used to be 90-95% nitro, they have been mandated to lower the nitro in the interest of cost savings. I will not dispense information which I feel is accurate as I am not the expert, I would only tell you to contact a Nitro fuel supplier like VP fuels and ask their experts your questions. They have the experience.
VooDooRocketry 3 years ago
good luck
bktech333 2 years ago
How did you fabricate that nozzle?
Is it machined from a billet, or is it laid up incrementally around a die and then densified somehow, or ...?
How much does it cost?
madvlad666 3 years ago
machined from a billet
teambnova 3 years ago
Looks like the test stand wanted to take off when it fired up :)
Zoomer30 3 years ago
wow! the nozzle is red hot by the end. what material did you use in the nozzle?
TGAcodes 3 years ago
nice! what fuel are u using?
ratodoesgato 3 years ago
propane & nitrous oxide
teambnova 3 years ago
Wow! Is it powerful enough to fly in a launch vehicle?
DTHRocket 3 years ago
Yes, if you consider the ultralightweight Lauryad Lunar Lander to be a launch vehicle.
The engine can be scaled up to thrust levels sufficient for a small launch vehicle.
teambnova 3 years ago
How much thrust?
Ferrariman60 3 years ago
200 lbs.
teambnova 3 years ago