"woody allen seems uncomfortable" i think it's because godard deliberately uses language in a confusing way. i think allen respects him though. decent interview.
"woody allen is a creep" maybe. but honestly...godard's films make me uncomfortable for some reason. i mean, sometimes they're funny...but i just think his fixation on women is more weird than allen's. godard's movies can be arduous. anyways i usually cant summarize a godard movie after seeing it. allen is probably a better filmmaker.
i don't think woody would have such a favourable estimation of the press, NOW. great interview, nonetheless but perhaps Godard was a little, I don't know, GODARD?
Jesus Godard, is this piece about Allen or about your annoying, self-indulgent, not funny, intercuts with title cards and music? This is completely intolerable and unwatchable. What on Earth was the point of making this at all? Talk about missing the boat entirely...
Can't anyone put english subtitles in the parts when they speak french, please? I know how to speak french but sometimes I get a bit lost. Pretty please!
Godard never considered this just a straight forward interview. Like all his films, its experimental. He's playing around with the structure of a director interview and I for one found it exceedingly interesting. There's a million straight-forward, boring interviews out there with Woody. This is something different, and quite refreshing.
Uh Woody Allen is to filmaking like what Bob Dylan is to songwriting i.e. opium for the psudo-intellectuals. He is also a pederast and the worst thing about the French other than thier arrogence is the fact that they have single handedly prevented this perv from being blackballed by Hollywood.
Godard had made some interesting but barmy films in the late 60's but is a dinosaur who has slowly dissapeared up his back passage.
@Shearnster : you look like a funny guy. don't know, ten years ago Dylan + Allen changed my life (in a way). What am I exactly ? a pederast or a psudo-intellectual ? or both ? (I hope so). Oh yeah, I forgot something : I think Godard is to cinema what Hegel was to philosophy : the man who came after and tried to say the meaning of the dead thing. Fuck, I can see I'm just a 'psudo-intellectual', what a useless life (my life : not your life for sure !).
Has anyone heard the story of Godard having no nuts. It's why in one of his films he is shown playing tennis without any balls. That would explain a lot I think.
it's amazing, isn't it, how impressed Godard is with Godard. He must imprint everything with his solipsistic narcissism. Ever see Sympathy for the Devil - the "documentary" he did of The Stones. Unwatchable. Screw Godard. He has no understanding of America, American icons, or New Yorkers. The only thing he knows, for sure, is his colon.
Its a great interview with alot of important advice from a remarkable director. However those seemingly random shots with random phrases in a black background just seem too distracting.
Bravo..It was fascinating being able to see Godard a genius. Interviewing another one..I found it so interesting when Woody described by how his Photographer director likes to shoot a scene and about the actors.. Fascinating!
What an insane thing to say that there are no regular men in American - he's just star struck and looking at the 'celebrity". Last time I looked there were 10's of thousands of actors in America that "weren't sexy".
Jean Luc Godard is a pretentious dud. Typical arrogant French cunt. This 'interview' is emblematic of his fraudulent and insincere output - oh, look, exposing the essential artifice of the 'interview' - not very insightful or enlightening. He would have better served the viewer if he'd just, you know, a chat with Allen. Instead he has to indulge in masturbatory nonsense with an agenda.
It's ironic that JLG's style is supposedly about getting the audience to think, but his delivery both in conversation and in film is all about making sure he is the one in control.
His best films combined radical invention with very uplifting humour... something which he sadly seems to have lost.
Goddard: So, tell me, Woody, why don't you take the possessory credit on all your films? Remember, I invented the auteur theory, which says directors are authors of films they don't even write...
Allen: Hmmmm, I don't know, Jean Luc, I guess, maybe it's because you're full of shit...Oh, and by the way, your movies are unwatchable.
Rob... I am a Godard enthusiast who vaguely agrees that some of his films are unwatchable. But, along with Rivette, Godard did more to test the limits of and expand cinematic narrative than anybody else before or since.
This only highlights Goddard's question to Allen about the influence of tv even more. It underlines how it dictates the perceptions and reactions of (passive) viewers, or rather I should say consumers. Furthermore, Allen is not a defenseless character, he has all the cinematic means at his
disposal to give a cinematic response to this Goddard's cinematic piece -- if he'd wished to do so.
One of the funny things in this thread of comments is that most people seem to be so used to the standardized tv interviews that, as a result, they feel very uncomfortable with this video. They seem to ignore the fact that most
interviewers in tv just plainly ignore the subject (cinema) when they talk with directors or actors in their shows. And I'd say that that should be a much more important concern.
Unwatchable! This isn't the Woody Allen interview... It's the Jean Luc-Godard Show! Woody is just the vehicle. Godard MUST be the star! Like that thing when you are talking to someone, and you can tell they're not listening to you: they're just waiting for their turn to speak.
I wonder, if Woody had been interviewing Godard, if he'd have edited across Godard's observations? Somehow I very much doubt it. In fact, I know he wouldn't have.
Funny, Allen seems a bit uncomfortable in front of Godard. I think he doesn't answer as he would if it was another person asking the same questions. ^^
He feels uncomfortable because it like Bach interviewing Madonna!!! Or Leonardo interviewing Johnny Carson- Ha, ha, ha!! W. Allen knows he's the Johnny Carson.
I wish he would treat the interview as just a normal interview instead of these ridiculous edits. He cut Woody off on a lot of his answers. Answers I would like to have heard...
Great questions. Godard is the best interviewer possible but damn how I wish it was more of a conversation - say a two hour conversation between both of them rather then an interrogation and I can do without the interruptions which nine out of ten times don't help. Better if he had used images to interrupt rather then those boring titles that add nothing but shrink rather then expand the conversation. Great stuff anyhow. Now if Godard can do this today with Martin Scorsese... !!!!!!
You're way too correct!! There is not a single observation around here as perceptive as yours! Everyone is just going "Wow! Go Woody!" or "Woody- he's the man!" or "I love Woody." Personally, if I were Woody and these are the comments I'm getting I'd seriously re-evaluate myself and my work. I would be thinking "Am I so bland and is my work so bad that all I elicit from people are comments like these?!! "Woody! You're the man!"
Believe me I'm a far cry from "pissing my pants," from reading a minor comment as yours. It's just that it rather appeared like a pearl when compared to the vast backdrop of ingorance written all around it. You would have elicited a much nicer comment from me if your comment to me would have been just a simple- "Oh thanks," as opposed to the stupid piss comment.
Self Obsessiveness leads to wisdom & great understanding(incl. other people). If the individual in question is able to avoid, stay clear, of the toxins which exists whilst promenading down the aisle of self obsession, if this subject can divorce them-self from being overly self important and indulgent, the rewards at the end are truly great! The rewards consist of great wisdom and knowledge.
Yes. Allen reflects exactly the American mentality of film/cinema. It is literary not cinematic! That is exactly the difference between Godard and his milieu. People like Allen & Hollywood do cinema or film as if it is a book. Godard does cinema or film as if it is exactly that. That is why Godard is head and shoulders above and beyond anybody else who ever touched a camera to make a movie.The Allen's of the world just don't get it. Henry Ford's work is more similar to Godard than Woody Allen's!
But thats a choice. It's not like American filmmakers are so inadequete they cant comprehend how to make a film that isnt essentially a 'story'. It's just that a story sells and always has done in hollwyood cos its a form of escapism for the massess.
As far as Allen goes, he's been writing, directing and starring in films once a year for the past 40 years. Alot of his recent films have not been up to his usual standards but they are better than most mainstream films and his best stuff is better than most films (although I can understand that this statement is more than a bit debatable).
Well I understand what you're saying. Theoretically, you are correct- it's not like Americans can't conceive my point. The problem is that they do little if anything about the conception and this winds up with the same ends. My point is that their all sell outs. Americans are just great at bending over and spreading their butt for cash. It is a symptom of a society gone mad. The only thing that is different about our society and that of Caligula is technology- that's it!!
We're just as stupid, wasteful, ignorant, and deserving of doom as in the times of Caligula & the days of Sodem & Gamorrah. The greed, avarice and other problems of our age has Irrevocable doomed humanity. It is unfortunate but true.
Because they want you to feel like you're in a Cabaret. It's very important that when watching this you're in a Cabaret of sorts drinking some good port and having a cigar. Oh, and smoke, there's gotta be a lot of cigar smoke lofting upwards in that typical cigar smoke billowing fashion. Get the picture? Okay now go and duplicate it okay?!! Then video yourself doing alll of the above while watching this You Tube clip. Then you must place that video on youtube for everybody to watch.
That's Godard's creation. The way he does things-art,etc. You're supposed to take this piece as a cinematic composition and not so completely and strictly as an interview with W. Allen. Imagine a composer makes a musical composition which is centered around another musical compositon. You will have unexpected and seemingly random parts merging into each other. Capiche?!
yea, he's seem a bit nervous too, weird considering that he's a legend interviewing a relatively great film director, i mean of course this was after the landmark A.H. and Manhattan, but WA had yet to engrave himself, i believe, with Crimes n'MD as a legend. i mean his wit is impecable, and i cant laud him enough, but the darker flicks really just showed his range, attributes of truely great filmmakers is the ability to excel in anything.
l'entrevue est intéressante mais Godard ne voit en cette interview qu'un autre moyen de montrer au monde son intelligence, c'est dommage qu'il ne se concentre pas plus sur la réflexion cinématographique de woody allen. Un peu d'humilité ne serait pas de trop
"I mix images and sounds like a scientist, I hope. The mystery of the scientific is the same as the mystery of the artist. So is the misery." Goddard.
At that time, Woody lived in an apartment overlooking central park so it probably is his place. Mia Farrow had an apartment on the opposite side of the park. They had telescopes so that they could wave to and see each other! :)
The music at the beginning is George Gershwin's 'Rhapsody in Blue', which Allen used in his film Manhattan, I believe.
deirdrebounds 1 month ago
which song is that at the begginig of the video?
funkaluca 1 month ago
Why are 2&3 not available on mobile?
bigideas3 1 month ago
Woody is so damn intimidated by JLG
my1990ful 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sheesh - More Godard than Allen. Like the film is about his artistic interests in portraying Allen than an interview with Allen.
me2i81sour2 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sheesh - More Godard than Allen. Like the film is about his artistic interests in portraying Allen than an interview with Allen.
me2i81sour2 5 months ago
Sheesh - More Godard than Allen. Like he the film for is about his artistic interests in portraying Allen than an interview with Allen.
me2i81sour2 5 months ago
@me2i81sour2 so?
queiloroincontri 2 months ago
"woody allen seems uncomfortable" i think it's because godard deliberately uses language in a confusing way. i think allen respects him though. decent interview.
"woody allen is a creep" maybe. but honestly...godard's films make me uncomfortable for some reason. i mean, sometimes they're funny...but i just think his fixation on women is more weird than allen's. godard's movies can be arduous. anyways i usually cant summarize a godard movie after seeing it. allen is probably a better filmmaker.
matthewsween 7 months ago
this is obviously a statement on how a well conducted interview can become a narrative itself with the use of frequent interrupting titles
/sarcasm
(I love Godard, but this video fucking sucks)
slangshotstudios 7 months ago 3
Wish some one would upload Godard.s movies
deansusky 8 months ago
I put a lot of thought into this comment
bobbybobsta 8 months ago
I am extremely irritated by the constant interference of the black screen with letters on it- a single thought is hardly ever completed
garbageidiot 9 months ago
@garbageidiot
Protip: if that irritated you, don't watch a Godard film.
thot4 8 months ago 10
I am extremely irritated by the constant interference of the black screen with letters on it
garbageidiot 9 months ago
How the hell can someone DISLIKE this?!?!?
lfcruzsierra 9 months ago
Comment removed
TakovskyPoetOfCinema 10 months ago
i don't think woody would have such a favourable estimation of the press, NOW. great interview, nonetheless but perhaps Godard was a little, I don't know, GODARD?
barrytron3030 10 months ago
pause at 0:36. he looks like that thing in the cantina from star wars.
obbligato555 11 months ago
0:22 - Woody wearing panties?
bapyou 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey, does anybody know where can i get this film with english subtitles???
pls, if u do, let me know.
triniti04 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey, does anybody know where can i get this film with english subtitles???
pls, if u do, let me know.
triniti04 1 year ago
hey, does anybody know where can i get this film with english subtitles???
pls, if u do, let me know.
triniti04 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hey, does anybody know where can i get this film with english subtitles???
pls, if u do, let me know.
triniti04 1 year ago
hey, does anybody know where can i get this film with english subtitles???
pls, if u do, let me know.
triniti04 1 year ago
Those titles are a bit distracting. It really makes one question the interest the director has in Allen as an interview.
chopin65 1 year ago 2
Très amusant êtres instructif
Très Godardien
Master Man.
jimglas 1 year ago
can someone tell me the name of the music in the beginning?
lovely7007 1 year ago
Comment removed
flandersfails 1 year ago
I've visited an interesting youtube channel : LDooderman from illustrator/Videomaker Leonardo Doderman...very interesting
LDooderman 1 year ago
Jesus Godard, is this piece about Allen or about your annoying, self-indulgent, not funny, intercuts with title cards and music? This is completely intolerable and unwatchable. What on Earth was the point of making this at all? Talk about missing the boat entirely...
yisacknayrabin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hello, I'm Rags...woof woof. No it's not spam, this is for real Woody Allen fans.
f you like Woody watch Jerry Rio
at (Mr JerryRio) and the (Thyrdeye) channel. He reminds a lot of comedy lovers of a Woody Allen or Larry David type character and he is hilarious!
His interviews and "Man On The Street" segments are some of best comedy you will see online anywhere!
MrJerryRio 1 year ago
I've been told several times that Allen speaks French...why does he need a translator?
levanyzzuf 1 year ago
Can't anyone put english subtitles in the parts when they speak french, please? I know how to speak french but sometimes I get a bit lost. Pretty please!
annieinthehall 1 year ago
He actually though DeNiro and Pachino were to sexy? I could only imagine how he feels about new leading actors these days.
fafmouser 1 year ago
this was kind of interesting until the obnoxious interruptions with music and lame titles.
cinemar 1 year ago
Pause at 0:29. It looks like he's wearing a bikini.
turntapzap 1 year ago 41
@turntapzap I think its a thong.
loudbytecinema 5 months ago
Fantastique et artistique meme soustitre!
Merci beaucoup mattyeuh
Merci!
Dr John Koistinen-Lindgren
Royaume de Thailande
carsanookdotcom 1 year ago
Allen Woody. A beer drinker. Godard a Galoise smoker
He is one of my two living favorite directors.
The other one is Werner Herzog. You'll find him on YouTube.
Dr John
CarSanook
Kingdom of Thailand
carsanookdotcom 1 year ago
sometimes Godard irritates me.. sometimes he inspires me.. sometimes i think he thinks too much and talks too much... to each his own..
ajnaf1 1 year ago 3
Thank god woody isn't talking, how he ever got the reputation of 'thinker' or artist just shows the idiocy of American culture.
MrMarxwasright 1 year ago
horrible interview. Exactly how NOT to interview a person, getting in the way of your subject with annoying cut-aways and mad, senseless cuts.
septip123 1 year ago
Godard never considered this just a straight forward interview. Like all his films, its experimental. He's playing around with the structure of a director interview and I for one found it exceedingly interesting. There's a million straight-forward, boring interviews out there with Woody. This is something different, and quite refreshing.
jerseysdeniro 1 year ago 4
Two of the most brilliant filmmakers and Gershwin, a master of music.
Super8StrikesBack 1 year ago
well well!!
dekekyo 1 year ago
Why do you have to leave negative and pointless comment on what you clearly don't get?
Beetoe 1 year ago
Uh Woody Allen is to filmaking like what Bob Dylan is to songwriting i.e. opium for the psudo-intellectuals. He is also a pederast and the worst thing about the French other than thier arrogence is the fact that they have single handedly prevented this perv from being blackballed by Hollywood.
Godard had made some interesting but barmy films in the late 60's but is a dinosaur who has slowly dissapeared up his back passage.
Shearnster 1 year ago
@Shearnster
LOL.
It has to be hard-or cool- to be you. Now, I'm a psudo(sic) intellectual because I like Woody.
Jo, filmaking.
lofod 1 year ago
@Shearnster
People who write psudo-BLANK are worse than child molesters. Which Woody Allen ISN"T, you racist shit.
Bob Dylan? You're right, he's no Doodletown Pipers or Lee Greenwood.
FungusMossGnosis 1 year ago
@Shearnster : you look like a funny guy. don't know, ten years ago Dylan + Allen changed my life (in a way). What am I exactly ? a pederast or a psudo-intellectual ? or both ? (I hope so). Oh yeah, I forgot something : I think Godard is to cinema what Hegel was to philosophy : the man who came after and tried to say the meaning of the dead thing. Fuck, I can see I'm just a 'psudo-intellectual', what a useless life (my life : not your life for sure !).
skonerr 1 year ago
Has anyone heard the story of Godard having no nuts. It's why in one of his films he is shown playing tennis without any balls. That would explain a lot I think.
PtAltmVansanTarr 1 year ago
Is that fade a joke or what! Godard is a joke for sure.
PtAltmVansanTarr 1 year ago
it's amazing, isn't it, how impressed Godard is with Godard. He must imprint everything with his solipsistic narcissism. Ever see Sympathy for the Devil - the "documentary" he did of The Stones. Unwatchable. Screw Godard. He has no understanding of America, American icons, or New Yorkers. The only thing he knows, for sure, is his colon.
VIDJACK 1 year ago
Well I was quite alive in 1986 and remember a lot of actors that I wouldn't have considered "sexy". To each their own.
Picardy 1 year ago
0:22 ... the fade makes Woody look like he's wearing panties.
bapyou 1 year ago
damn ! im trying to hear some of W A through all those special effects ! so annoying..
ivmarta 1 year ago
Disastrous editing.
hbh2046 1 year ago
PS this interview sucks and is terrific
francoisXIV 1 year ago
un américain à paris, ou j'aimerais bien me trouver
francoisXIV 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrRazorcharlie 1 year ago
HAHA! This is brilliant!
biiicyclerace 1 year ago
Its a great interview with alot of important advice from a remarkable director. However those seemingly random shots with random phrases in a black background just seem too distracting.
truss508 1 year ago
As i grow older i tolerate less and less Godard.
lamibenoit 1 year ago
My two favorite directors, geniuses in my eyes. They don't make movies that have meaning, as much anymore..
BethanyCharlene 1 year ago
Génial, je ne connaissais pas ce document... Merci infiniment.
ouchouchgrandma 1 year ago
Le montage est très original,
Godard est fidèle à lui-même.
robertlaberge 1 year ago
Annoying editing, let the man speak, wtf?
OmegaGraham 1 year ago
it's a parodie of interview . Woody Allen use the same technique in deconstructing harry.
stanleyKubrik11 1 year ago
I was 8 years old when this happened... Unaware... My niece will have more culture... More access
johnnysocco3 1 year ago
Godard always makes me laugh...
Alkhir69 2 years ago
Very good, Mr Godard... You know how to treat a fellow director just with acting... Pretty fine Hoo?
danmalo 2 years ago
Bravo..It was fascinating being able to see Godard a genius. Interviewing another one..I found it so interesting when Woody described by how his Photographer director likes to shoot a scene and about the actors.. Fascinating!
iaralillylynosjohn 2 years ago 2
What an insane thing to say that there are no regular men in American - he's just star struck and looking at the 'celebrity". Last time I looked there were 10's of thousands of actors in America that "weren't sexy".
Picardy 2 years ago
Comment removed
nickvansmak 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jean Luc Godard is a pretentious dud. Typical arrogant French cunt. This 'interview' is emblematic of his fraudulent and insincere output - oh, look, exposing the essential artifice of the 'interview' - not very insightful or enlightening. He would have better served the viewer if he'd just, you know, a chat with Allen. Instead he has to indulge in masturbatory nonsense with an agenda.
gingerbreadface 2 years ago
@gingerbreadface
To call Godard a French cunt alone destroys your argument. If you want people to take you seriously, I would suggest swaying from that habit.
JansenPM 2 years ago 42
@JansenPM How about 'Maoist piece of garbage'?
Thomistica 1 year ago
It's ironic that JLG's style is supposedly about getting the audience to think, but his delivery both in conversation and in film is all about making sure he is the one in control.
His best films combined radical invention with very uplifting humour... something which he sadly seems to have lost.
yvamarquer 2 years ago
JLG's comment on TV influence just shows how he's willing to use and abuse anybody for his own bitter "anti-capitalist" posturing.
yvamarquer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Too bad Goddard cut out this part:
Goddard: So, tell me, Woody, why don't you take the possessory credit on all your films? Remember, I invented the auteur theory, which says directors are authors of films they don't even write...
Allen: Hmmmm, I don't know, Jean Luc, I guess, maybe it's because you're full of shit...Oh, and by the way, your movies are unwatchable.
robgoren 2 years ago
=))))
vreaucont 2 years ago
What exactly makes Godard's films unwatchable?
believerster 2 years ago
Rob... I am a Godard enthusiast who vaguely agrees that some of his films are unwatchable. But, along with Rivette, Godard did more to test the limits of and expand cinematic narrative than anybody else before or since.
MirrorMatterMatt 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
TravisBickle72 2 years ago
This only highlights Goddard's question to Allen about the influence of tv even more. It underlines how it dictates the perceptions and reactions of (passive) viewers, or rather I should say consumers. Furthermore, Allen is not a defenseless character, he has all the cinematic means at his
disposal to give a cinematic response to this Goddard's cinematic piece -- if he'd wished to do so.
trepante2 2 years ago
One of the funny things in this thread of comments is that most people seem to be so used to the standardized tv interviews that, as a result, they feel very uncomfortable with this video. They seem to ignore the fact that most
interviewers in tv just plainly ignore the subject (cinema) when they talk with directors or actors in their shows. And I'd say that that should be a much more important concern.
trepante2 2 years ago 2
I think these guys should have another interview since they're both still alive.
It'd be hilarious.
jpastuch 2 years ago 3
Godard, you bastard. That's horrible.
ReservoirDentPie 2 years ago
WOODY ALLEN SUCKS lolipops. He is awesome.
racsonam 2 years ago 3
Unwatchable! This isn't the Woody Allen interview... It's the Jean Luc-Godard Show! Woody is just the vehicle. Godard MUST be the star! Like that thing when you are talking to someone, and you can tell they're not listening to you: they're just waiting for their turn to speak.
I wonder, if Woody had been interviewing Godard, if he'd have edited across Godard's observations? Somehow I very much doubt it. In fact, I know he wouldn't have.
vieryuiop 2 years ago 6
Arguably Godard is the more interesting person, so it might all be for the best.
sartoresartus 2 years ago 3
Funny, Allen seems a bit uncomfortable in front of Godard. I think he doesn't answer as he would if it was another person asking the same questions. ^^
sblug2 2 years ago
He feels uncomfortable because it like Bach interviewing Madonna!!! Or Leonardo interviewing Johnny Carson- Ha, ha, ha!! W. Allen knows he's the Johnny Carson.
pishdad 2 years ago
I wish he would treat the interview as just a normal interview instead of these ridiculous edits. He cut Woody off on a lot of his answers. Answers I would like to have heard...
jdd32005 2 years ago 3
I like the subtitles, but there's a few bits that Allen hasn't said at all! Not very important concepts or anything lol...
wungabunga 2 years ago
he ceetainly has changed his opinion about the press since
barrytron3030 2 years ago 2
I think Goddard's composition actually sucks. Is that allowed?
jbearden 2 years ago
You can say what you want bro. You have freedom of speech. That's why our grandparent's fought the Nazis!
:)
vieryuiop 2 years ago
what's with the editing in this film!
Jannacek 2 years ago 5
What I love is the respect Woody shows Godard. You can see he loves the man. And visa - versa.
Phalces 2 years ago
Great questions. Godard is the best interviewer possible but damn how I wish it was more of a conversation - say a two hour conversation between both of them rather then an interrogation and I can do without the interruptions which nine out of ten times don't help. Better if he had used images to interrupt rather then those boring titles that add nothing but shrink rather then expand the conversation. Great stuff anyhow. Now if Godard can do this today with Martin Scorsese... !!!!!!
Phalces 2 years ago
rhapsody in blue =)
marblewonder 2 years ago
i find it a bit ironic how godard is interviewing allen...
but then again, i think is interview is more of godard exploring cinema evolution and chooses allen for whatever reason..
i dunno.
girlinthenoir 3 years ago
You're way too correct!! There is not a single observation around here as perceptive as yours! Everyone is just going "Wow! Go Woody!" or "Woody- he's the man!" or "I love Woody." Personally, if I were Woody and these are the comments I'm getting I'd seriously re-evaluate myself and my work. I would be thinking "Am I so bland and is my work so bad that all I elicit from people are comments like these?!! "Woody! You're the man!"
pishdad 3 years ago
jeez don't piss your pants lol
girlinthenoir 2 years ago 2
Believe me I'm a far cry from "pissing my pants," from reading a minor comment as yours. It's just that it rather appeared like a pearl when compared to the vast backdrop of ingorance written all around it. You would have elicited a much nicer comment from me if your comment to me would have been just a simple- "Oh thanks," as opposed to the stupid piss comment.
pishdad 2 years ago
oh, i thought I sensed a lot of sarcasm in your comment when I first read it
i guess i read it wrong now viewing it again
sorry about that man~
girlinthenoir 2 years ago 3
Self Obsessiveness leads to wisdom & great understanding(incl. other people). If the individual in question is able to avoid, stay clear, of the toxins which exists whilst promenading down the aisle of self obsession, if this subject can divorce them-self from being overly self important and indulgent, the rewards at the end are truly great! The rewards consist of great wisdom and knowledge.
pishdad 3 years ago
Yes. Allen reflects exactly the American mentality of film/cinema. It is literary not cinematic! That is exactly the difference between Godard and his milieu. People like Allen & Hollywood do cinema or film as if it is a book. Godard does cinema or film as if it is exactly that. That is why Godard is head and shoulders above and beyond anybody else who ever touched a camera to make a movie.The Allen's of the world just don't get it. Henry Ford's work is more similar to Godard than Woody Allen's!
pishdad 3 years ago
But thats a choice. It's not like American filmmakers are so inadequete they cant comprehend how to make a film that isnt essentially a 'story'. It's just that a story sells and always has done in hollwyood cos its a form of escapism for the massess.
GoonerAlias 3 years ago
As far as Allen goes, he's been writing, directing and starring in films once a year for the past 40 years. Alot of his recent films have not been up to his usual standards but they are better than most mainstream films and his best stuff is better than most films (although I can understand that this statement is more than a bit debatable).
GoonerAlias 3 years ago
Well I understand what you're saying. Theoretically, you are correct- it's not like Americans can't conceive my point. The problem is that they do little if anything about the conception and this winds up with the same ends. My point is that their all sell outs. Americans are just great at bending over and spreading their butt for cash. It is a symptom of a society gone mad. The only thing that is different about our society and that of Caligula is technology- that's it!!
pishdad 3 years ago
We're just as stupid, wasteful, ignorant, and deserving of doom as in the times of Caligula & the days of Sodem & Gamorrah. The greed, avarice and other problems of our age has Irrevocable doomed humanity. It is unfortunate but true.
pishdad 3 years ago
You don't have to say "we're" because clearly you're the model citizen.
haprdgn 2 years ago
Oh! Yes, you're so correct!
pishdad 2 years ago
I nearly choked on that huge smug cloud you emitted.
haprdgn 2 years ago 2
Why am I not surprised?! (-:
pishdad 2 years ago
Comment removed
GoonerAlias 3 years ago
Wow! Someone has 1/2 a brain!!
pishdad 3 years ago
Wow! Someone actually has 1/2 a brain!!!
pishdad 3 years ago
why the fuck does the music has to interrupt so my times?
arained 3 years ago
Because they want you to feel like you're in a Cabaret. It's very important that when watching this you're in a Cabaret of sorts drinking some good port and having a cigar. Oh, and smoke, there's gotta be a lot of cigar smoke lofting upwards in that typical cigar smoke billowing fashion. Get the picture? Okay now go and duplicate it okay?!! Then video yourself doing alll of the above while watching this You Tube clip. Then you must place that video on youtube for everybody to watch.
pishdad 3 years ago
That's Godard's creation. The way he does things-art,etc. You're supposed to take this piece as a cinematic composition and not so completely and strictly as an interview with W. Allen. Imagine a composer makes a musical composition which is centered around another musical compositon. You will have unexpected and seemingly random parts merging into each other. Capiche?!
pishdad 3 years ago
I completely understand what you mean. However, it is also very annoying. Certainly there can be self-indulgent, pointless art, much like this case.
CinnamonTree 2 years ago
yea, he's seem a bit nervous too, weird considering that he's a legend interviewing a relatively great film director, i mean of course this was after the landmark A.H. and Manhattan, but WA had yet to engrave himself, i believe, with Crimes n'MD as a legend. i mean his wit is impecable, and i cant laud him enough, but the darker flicks really just showed his range, attributes of truely great filmmakers is the ability to excel in anything.
carlo88moe 3 years ago
Wow never heard Godard speak English before....
DoubleTalkingJive 3 years ago 2
l'entrevue est intéressante mais Godard ne voit en cette interview qu'un autre moyen de montrer au monde son intelligence, c'est dommage qu'il ne se concentre pas plus sur la réflexion cinématographique de woody allen. Un peu d'humilité ne serait pas de trop
Allen01ginsberg 3 years ago 6
the mix of titles and music is fuking annoying, woody allen...ten seconds of interview, title and music....seven minutes.Godard you wierdo. x
tomes55moon 3 years ago 2
"I mix images and sounds like a scientist, I hope. The mystery of the scientific is the same as the mystery of the artist. So is the misery." Goddard.
Couldn't agree more.
TheRealBladeRunner 3 years ago
Is there a way to downdoad and save this?
rollswrangler 3 years ago
holy god, i love woody allen
barry06 3 years ago 4
Comment removed
flandersfails 3 years ago
At that time, Woody lived in an apartment overlooking central park so it probably is his place. Mia Farrow had an apartment on the opposite side of the park. They had telescopes so that they could wave to and see each other! :)
vieryuiop 2 years ago 4
i could imagine that haha so woody
Johnnyo743 2 years ago