Woman: Do not achieve, regrettably, this despair...this mourning...it seems...it seems to me...Man: Sky(God) did I understand?Did I understand?In this voice which trembles, in these eyes full of tears, isn'it a confession of what I read(or say)?Woman: Ah keep silent!Man: What's the use to try, to deceive us again?Woman: I implore you! Man: Go away! We were both lying, by saying us winners, of the immortal love, which quiver in our hearts! To continue... I'm getting really tired to translate.
Translation:(Man) All my soul is there! Why wake me up, ô breath of the spring? Why, wake me up? On my front, I feel, your caresses. And neverthless very close, is the time, of thunderstorms, and of sadnesses. Why wake me up, ô breathe of the spring? Tomorrow in the valey, will comme the traveler, remembering, of my first glory. And his eyes vainly will search, my magnificience. They will find, only mourning and poverty! Regrettably! Why wake me up, ô breathe, of the spring?! To continue...
Définitivement, cette version est absolument magnifique, et définitivement Hampson m'est pas un ténor, mais un grand baryton avec des des résonances d'une grande brillance. Tous les barytons ne sont pas obligés de couvrir à l'excès leurs notes aiguës.
Now I absolutely love Thomas Hampson. I have sung for him in a master class. Incredible baritone if not the best in the world. WHY OH WHY would they choose him to sing a TENOR area and leave out the wonderful melody and high notes just to let him do it??? Werther is such a gorgeous opera.
@Durchlaucht1970 this was written by massenet himself . the opera was written for tenor and was written for baritone another time .... the composer wants this 2nd version .... but for sure i prefer the tenor version
No, este es tenor SIN AGUDOS. Quieren oir baritones, oigan a Merril, Warren, Taddei, Bastianini,, but Handsome is very simple a tenor with NO HIGH NOTE.
Listen how he open the F and F sharp -even many tenors cover those notes.
Two great American singers, and I love this baritone version, gives a different debth to this character, and in consequence, to the whole opera as well.
Muy interesante! Las versiones alternativas y las premieres mundiales deberían estar prohibidas de representar, a menos que canten bien como estos 2. Excelente!
Je serais curieux d'entendre l'aigu de ce chanteur, car d'après moi il pourrait le chanter dans la version ténor. Mais c'est aussi très beau ainsi. C'est deux magnifiques voix!! Merci!!
Yes, i've known the tenor's version because it's the famous version. And it was weird to listen to this because I sing the tenor's version a long time ago. But I'm a baryton, and it's so good because the instrumental partitions are the sames, but the voice is not a tenor : it's a baryton. I think that Massenet has done a good job.
@matthieuaufranc97513 , I know that Hampson is baryton, and the song was composed for baryton too, but i think weird. I dont think ugly, but is wierd. Sorry again.
It's interesting to listen to this side-by-side with the tenor version. Same lyrics, but you get something different out of it. For example, listen to the "ma splendeur" section at 1:56. This is a climax point for the baritone, but the tenors run right through it.
Massanet would have had to lower the whole opera a minor 3rd. It was much easier to rewrite the one part to suit a baritone. I wish it was performed more often.
@peppuz81 Es normal que uno trate de seguir la melodía harto conocida de la versión para tenor..pero si nunca hubiese escuchado el aria para tenor..esta le parecerá a uno soberbia también....(no es nada antinatural). Y en la voz de Hampson es todo un suceso.
Toute mon âme est là! Pourquoi me réveiller, ô souffle du printemps,pourquoi me réveiller? Sur mon front je sens tes caresses, Et pourtant bien proche est le temps Des orages et des tristesses! Pourquoi me réveiller, o souffle du printemps? Demain dans le vallon viendra le voyageur Se souvenant de ma gloire première... Et ses yeux vainement chercheront ma splendeur, ils ne trouveront plus que deuil et que misère! Hélas! Pourquoi me réveiller ô souffle du printemps!
quelle horreur!!!!!!!il est plus à sa place dans Posa
ininacsot 5 months ago
Woman: Do not achieve, regrettably, this despair...this mourning...it seems...it seems to me...Man: Sky(God) did I understand?Did I understand?In this voice which trembles, in these eyes full of tears, isn'it a confession of what I read(or say)?Woman: Ah keep silent!Man: What's the use to try, to deceive us again?Woman: I implore you! Man: Go away! We were both lying, by saying us winners, of the immortal love, which quiver in our hearts! To continue... I'm getting really tired to translate.
marclink0 6 months ago
Translation:(Man) All my soul is there! Why wake me up, ô breath of the spring? Why, wake me up? On my front, I feel, your caresses. And neverthless very close, is the time, of thunderstorms, and of sadnesses. Why wake me up, ô breathe of the spring? Tomorrow in the valey, will comme the traveler, remembering, of my first glory. And his eyes vainly will search, my magnificience. They will find, only mourning and poverty! Regrettably! Why wake me up, ô breathe, of the spring?! To continue...
marclink0 6 months ago
his rendition is different from that of ludovic teziér, or are my ears mistaken?
EriolAB 8 months ago
Queeeer. My ears don't stand so deep modifications. And not talking about Hampson's voice, which is outstanding.
operamaniak81 9 months ago
Comment removed
barytondehautemer 1 year ago
Définitivement, cette version est absolument magnifique, et définitivement Hampson m'est pas un ténor, mais un grand baryton avec des des résonances d'une grande brillance. Tous les barytons ne sont pas obligés de couvrir à l'excès leurs notes aiguës.
barytondehautemer 1 year ago
Oh un opéra avec Plasson à la baguette et à Toulouse ! ça rappelle de bons souvenirs musicaux. Merci
billauw 1 year ago
Now I absolutely love Thomas Hampson. I have sung for him in a master class. Incredible baritone if not the best in the world. WHY OH WHY would they choose him to sing a TENOR area and leave out the wonderful melody and high notes just to let him do it??? Werther is such a gorgeous opera.
Durchlaucht1970 1 year ago
@Durchlaucht1970 this was written by massenet himself . the opera was written for tenor and was written for baritone another time .... the composer wants this 2nd version .... but for sure i prefer the tenor version
FadiaElHageFan 4 months ago
No, este es tenor SIN AGUDOS. Quieren oir baritones, oigan a Merril, Warren, Taddei, Bastianini,, but Handsome is very simple a tenor with NO HIGH NOTE.
Listen how he open the F and F sharp -even many tenors cover those notes.
delosreyesgavikanes 1 year ago
Well not too bad....I saw Jonas Kaufmann in Paris this winter....much different
gillesparis09 1 year ago
How cool would it be to have a trio do this?
seektheforce 1 year ago
Great version. Where to obtain sheet of music?
VladaMu1 1 year ago
The melody is a little different from the tenor aria
Sound not good for me
But may be good for someone else taste
tranxuannghia 1 year ago
Two great American singers, and I love this baritone version, gives a different debth to this character, and in consequence, to the whole opera as well.
persthlm71 1 year ago
Does anyone know how can i get sheetnotes of this baritone version? Please HELP!
piotrkamienski 1 year ago
sarebbe bella forse se non conoscessimo l'originale....
odontotazio 1 year ago
Muy interesante! Las versiones alternativas y las premieres mundiales deberían estar prohibidas de representar, a menos que canten bien como estos 2. Excelente!
f1a6b3 1 year ago
non mi piace affatto .
bodiloto 2 years ago
Très belle interprétation peut être plus "complète" que celle de L.Tézier...?
papidou1934 2 years ago
i like it, but tenor version is emotionally stronger.
678loka 2 years ago
Je serais curieux d'entendre l'aigu de ce chanteur, car d'après moi il pourrait le chanter dans la version ténor. Mais c'est aussi très beau ainsi. C'est deux magnifiques voix!! Merci!!
lesbonnesoreilles 2 years ago
mmm.. pas sûr qu'il puisse sortir un sib, mais avec Thomas Hampson, on ne sait jamais !
Cosifantuttee 2 years ago
Très belle version pour baryton interprété par
Hampson très en voix.bravo
girardje70 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
eeeuuuuggh!! I am very suprised Hampson wasnt arrested for masturbating in public!
cyfair02 2 years ago
Weird. I love Hampson but is weird.
linow666 2 years ago
why? He sings this song for baryton, and very well, doesn't he?
matthieuaufranc97513 1 year ago
@matthieuaufranc97513 , I think weird because i remember the tenor melody. Hampson ever sings very well, but is weird, sorry.
linow666 1 year ago
Yes, i've known the tenor's version because it's the famous version. And it was weird to listen to this because I sing the tenor's version a long time ago. But I'm a baryton, and it's so good because the instrumental partitions are the sames, but the voice is not a tenor : it's a baryton. I think that Massenet has done a good job.
matthieuaufranc97513 1 year ago
@matthieuaufranc97513 , I know that Hampson is baryton, and the song was composed for baryton too, but i think weird. I dont think ugly, but is wierd. Sorry again.
linow666 1 year ago
@linow666 No problem, You haven't to be sorry, ou know?;)
Thanks for your comment
matthieuaufranc97513 1 year ago
It's interesting to listen to this side-by-side with the tenor version. Same lyrics, but you get something different out of it. For example, listen to the "ma splendeur" section at 1:56. This is a climax point for the baritone, but the tenors run right through it.
OperaVince 2 years ago
Un tenor cantando la versión para barítono
tebiano 2 years ago
Quel ténor?
Thomas Hampson est un baryton américain.
Foly90 2 years ago
hum?!?!?!?!?!?!?
babafofao 2 years ago
For your information:
Massenet was so touched from the voice of Mattia Batistini and he rewrote the part of Werther for him .
At his time Batistini was one of the best baritones in the world and he was called as "Il Re dei Baritoni" the King of Baritones.
arisargiris 2 years ago 9
This is a masterful reworking by Massenet, and a first class heartrending rendition by Hampson.
The great Massenet knew the greatness of the Baritone sond would triumph in an alternate and distinct version!
stevetex
stevetexon 2 years ago 7
different but genuine in the sensibility...
blackkat005 2 years ago 2
bah, a me proprio non piace, un aria del genere non può ridursi ad un abbozzo di controcanto. Completamente snaturata
peppuz81 3 years ago
à peppuz81
Massenet wrote this air so for baritone, it is not the same that for the tenor.
The melody is good
l' aria n' est pas dénaturé, ce n' est pas celui du ténor.
Foly90 3 years ago
wouldn't it be better to lower 2 and half notes and then sing it with the well-known melody used by tenors?
voltape 2 years ago
Massanet would have had to lower the whole opera a minor 3rd. It was much easier to rewrite the one part to suit a baritone. I wish it was performed more often.
OperaVince 2 years ago
@peppuz81 Es normal que uno trate de seguir la melodía harto conocida de la versión para tenor..pero si nunca hubiese escuchado el aria para tenor..esta le parecerá a uno soberbia también....(no es nada antinatural). Y en la voz de Hampson es todo un suceso.
JorPove 1 year ago
J'aime bien cette version pour baryton,
excellente interpretation ,bravo
girardje70 3 years ago
So beautiful! His voice is just so mesmerizing!
Elisabetta611 3 years ago 2
why not hush and just let your senses get blessed by this great artistry...
blessed be youtube and all the nice souls who posts this awsome moments ..
Ciao foly ,
eutuve from Italy
eutuve 3 years ago 3
not good. the melody has been competely misinterpreted and was not sung as, the great aria that it is.
aaron3lee 3 years ago
Massenet wrote this air so for baritone, it is not the same that for the tenor.
The melody is good.
Foly90 3 years ago 6
i stand corrected. thankyou.
aaron3lee 3 years ago
@aaron3lee Massenet wrote it like this! T. Hampson is singing it correctly
craigwalters 1 year ago
un couple émouvant même si la version baryton merveilleusement chantée par T Hampson est moins lyrique que celle pour ténor.
richardmarseille 3 years ago
Yes, but I think the only difference is because the baritone version has less high notes...
chiara54324 3 years ago
chiara54324 3 years ago