1/4 Webster Tarpley: Critique of Ron Paul's Austerity Plan.

[individualist73]

Ron paul first supported the 9/11 people then he disowned them,

[mrscambuster1001]

@matthew1722

GO point for point on this one-sided hack interview. Please reply.

[mrscambuster1001]

@matthew1722

Webster Tarpley is a hypocrite for appearing numeroud times on the Alex Jones Show and films (an ardent Dr. Ron Paul supporter) where Tarpley talks at length about the New World Order --- the REAL 1% elite which Dr. Ron Paul is STRONGLY OPPOSED.

Tarpley has talked out of both sides of his mouth, depending on which audience he appears in front of.

[mrscambuster1001]

@matthew1722

Please do debate, tell us what you have you. Who do you support??

[mrscambuster1001]

@matthew1722

Stop the nonsense. This is essentially placing a heavy focus on government controlled and funded (by the elite 1%) (NEW DEAL FDR was from one of the wealthiest elite Families in America, you do know that?)

The "New Deal" was to replace the "old deal" = the US Constitution. All to pave the way for One World (Depopulation) Government!

Will the current Medicare/aid food stamp population be better off with Dr. Paul and Big GOvt Out of their lives or be caged, neutered animals?

[matthew1722]

@mrscambuster1001 What matters is not so much that FDR is from a Boston Brahmin family, but that his administration was reacting reasonably to pressures which had built up throughout the electorate and population. Not that one cannot find anything to criticize in FDR's administration. Ask people who depend on social programs if they would like to go without food or health-care for some indefinite period until "the free market" has a decent job for them to return to.

[matthew1722]

@mrscambuster1001 And your assertion that these social programs are unconstitutional is laughable. The constitution has had varied interpretations from the beginning, and was meant to evolve. Many of these social programs are legitimate functions of government. If the people really disagreed they could change it through the electoral process. They likely will not, because Ron Paul's fantastic economic views are not anywhere close to what a majority of American's believe.

[LeoBaoig]

I love Tarpley for his historian skills, but as an economist he is missing some points. Firstly, the $1 trillion Ron Paul would save immediately, would come from troops overseas. The rest would come through a slow Congressional process thus allowing the "wash over" effect Tarpley talks about.

[matthew1722]

@LeoBaoig If you read Ron Paul's proposed budget, it cuts unemployment, food stamps, and WIC more precipitously than his proposed military cuts when you measure this on a percentage basis. Of course, it is questionable whether many of these cuts would make it through congress, but to even suggest these large cuts to these necessary and effective programs in the midst of a depression is questionable both economically and morally. These cuts would have dire demographic consequences.

[247FreedomOps]

He discredits himself in the first minute. Amazing. He has NO clue. This is probably why he cannot get on a descent show any longer. He completely disregards the plan and solution and immediately attacks it likely because it threatens his personal financial interest. What a douche bag.

[matthew1722]

@247FreedomOps Ron Paul is more of a shill than Tarpley. But if you've got any dirt on Tarpley regarding his personal financial interests, I'd love to hear about it. Certainly WT is not beyond criticism on certain points, but it seems you are just throwing the personal financial interest thing out there in a sad attempt to discredit him without any factual basis. Simply because he told some hurtful truths about your political idol, you lower yourself to contemptuous name calling?

[247FreedomOps]

Disinfo. Tarpley is an Establishment Shill.

[zilvinho84]

politicians LIE (haven't we learned that already???) To believe in politics=To believe in fairy tales... WAKE THE FUCK UP PPL (or should I say SHEEPLE) GODAMNIT!!!

[centurion180ad]

Paul is going to eliminate public systems that could still potentially revoke ownership of our planet from the mass murdering Debt Syndicate’s clutches. Paul will not (or will not be able) to alter financial control of our planet by Tax Free Foundations, Multinational Corporations particularly insurance gangsters, or British Accredited Registry Admiralty [kangaroo] Courts.

His order of engagement is backwards. Closing the FED without eradicating megabanks & foundations, is a suckers’ play.

[poohORpoe]

WIC does not approve organic, the rest is Frankenfood. 

[undeadpresident]

I like this but I don't like the Lady interviewing him

[TheFooob]

27% cut, that doesnt go far enough, you need a 50% cut within 2 years!, but no cuts to the Military, spend more on that, and declere war on Iran and Syria!.

[Packgammon]

Webster Tarpley is an amazingly intelligent guy. Problem is his character, exploiting the fame of Ron Paul, rather to support him. To boost his popularity Webster Tarpley will do anything to put himself in the spotlight, even though he might have the influence to make a zombie, any of the other candidates, the GOP candidate. Disgusting is a hard word but sorry, it is.

[ngonea]

@Packgammon - did you not learn anything from watching the spectacle of hero worshiping when O-bomber was S-elected? Ron Paul is a good man, but he is not the Messiah and he is only one man, who works for US INC..like all the rest of those in the sine die, unconvened since 1861 Con-gress. Webster Tarpley is giving you the facts, why attack him for that?

[Packgammon]

@ngonea I never said he was the messiah. Are you comparing Obomber with his piss-prize to RP?Fact is that all other candidates will attack Iran sooner or later, this is their declared goal.Did you follow the GOP debates?Why doesn't WT point out what the economy under Romney, Santorum or Gingrich will look like? Or do you think the economy will be wonderful due to stolen oil, the elite handing their profits to the american people? Why doesn´t he meet RP to join forces rather than bashing?

[Packgammon]

@Packgammon Btw I´m not the only one with this opinion. Other guys at Prison Planet see it the same way. Maybe next week WT will attack RP because he refrained that 9/11 was an inside job? Who knows? If you want to be a really great guy, you have to think of the consequences before you act.

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon If you'd read any of Tarpley's work you would realize that his opposition to Ron Paul is quite ideological, apart from any ploy to aggrandize himself. This is consistant with what he has written for many years. He has been opposed to the Austrian school of economics for a very long time, which would tend to confirm that his opposition is primarily ideological and philosophical. Whether you agree with his ideology or philosophy is another matter.

[Packgammon]

@matthew1722 My guess is that with or without Austrian Economics we won't see milk and honey soon but I do see depleted uranium. And I also see a society too lazy to go to peace rallies in large numbers. Drones and cruising warships are already on and near Iranian territory. Will there be a giant peace rally after 3 million dead Iraqis and 15000 dead soldiers and counter terror acts and the economy totally f**d up? Yes but then it's too late. WT is missing priorities. Go Ron!

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon Your suggestion that he's coming out agaist Paul for fame or something is still inaccurate. Tarpley does it because he fundamentally disagrees with him on many economic issues. The economy, which is his main area of disagreement, is a pretty big priority, just as important as foreign policy. Obviously his priorities are different than yours, so why not just explain your differences without making unfounded speculations about what his motivations might be?

[Packgammon]

@matthew1722 Nazification of the US has been going on for many years. Nowadays it is generally accepted to send the US army to foreign countries to murder people, contaminate the land with depleted uranium and steal resources.

Most Americans' mindset and this doesn't exclude your's personally, even though you are not personally the root of evil, is completely twisted.

When society's priority is higher for economical prosperity than for peace, then this society has become inhumane.

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon So in your estimation anyone who questions endorsing Ron Paul has a "mindset" which is "completely twisted"? I am quite aware of the shameful legacy of imperial interventions, so you don't need to persist with this pontificating about the evils of foreign wars. Economic survival is just as imperative as peace, and the two are not mutually exclusive; these objectives can actually be complimentary. Severe economic austerity also kills people, often just as effectively as war.

[Packgammon]

@matthew1722 My estimation is that when WT has the overwhelming desire to mock RP's economic policies, then the very least one can expect is that he dedicates the first half of his report to the subject what a moral champion RP is compared to the other presidential contender killer creatures. Missing the first point is an unforgivable failure. Given the fact that WT is intelligent, this is not only dumb but indicates evil.

To your last sentence: Work and not steal and kill.

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon WT has actually offered limited praise for Ron Paul's foreign policy, and it would be trivial to rehash the difference between the candidates when the debates make it obvious to anyone who cares. You confuse mockery with a fundamental ideological disagreement. Tarpley would be a hypocrite not to analyze Ron Paul's economic program after preaching for years against that very economic school of thought. If Ron Paul would like to refute WT, I'm sure Tarpley would welcome the discourse.

[hanyangwe]

@matthew1722 Tarpley won't debate any Austrian

[matthew1722]

@hanyangwe Ok.

[individualist73]

@matthew1722 That's a very good idea i'd like to see WT debate Ron Paul, because in my view, i believe paul supporters of which i was definitely one, tend to ignore some of ron pauls less attractive traits. The debate would only serve the purpose of showing the devout paul followers that he isnt perfect by any means. Because as we know now, ron paul has no chance of winning, Romney is the chosen one, the question is what is the relationship.

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon "To your last sentence: Work and not steal and kill." Ok I never said we should steal or kill? This statement is so general and lacking in context that it could be taken to mean many things.

[Packgammon]

@matthew1722 Watch this but watch it til the very end:

Ron Paul=Peace Obama=War - American killing machine

You said "Severe economic austerity also kills people, often just as effectively as war." You imply that you want to take care first people dying at home, in the richest country of the world and then you look - maybe - at war issue? Maybe Goldman Sachs (Obomba and Romney sponsor)can grow now in Libya and tomorrow in Iran. Good for the economy.Bought&paid for MSM inform people?

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon You can't look at these issues so seperately. The empire is being maintained economically as well as militarily. America has the richest economy only in terms of GDP per capita, but that is obviously distributed very unevenly among the population. The people of this country deserve a president who understands we need to ratchet down our global empire, while at the same time understands the plight of the working poor in this country. RP's economic policies appeal to people with money.

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon For example, Ron Paul wants to return to the gold standard. The effect this will have on people with a lot of debt will be crushing, since they would then have to pay back their loans in fastly appreciating dollars. RP owns a substantial amount of gold or gold securities, so this could be seen as a conflict of interest since he is talking about increasing the value of something he owns, but most Americans can't afford. His economic policies will hurt Americans who are the poorest.

[Packgammon]

@matthew1722 You have convinced me. Ron Paul is the most corrupt element ever. He just played the good guy for 76 years and with his coup d'etat he will turn his worthless gold into zillions.

Do me a favor and talk to somebody else, bye.

[matthew1722]

@Packgammon I realize you are convinced beyond all reason to vote for Ron Paul, I have no illusions about trying to convince you to vote otherwise. But your weak rhetoric is not factually based. Ron Paul's economic program will devestate this country if he get's his way, regardless of the fact that he means well and has integrity. Ron Paul unnecessarily cuts social programs which feed infants and children, and if I had a mind as simple as yours I could make an arguement that this is evil.

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 and your statement that his program will devastate this country is fact based? did you get those facts from the FACT Finder crystal ball or the old 8 ball of answers.

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 If you actually study history, never has what he proposes to do worked economically. It's totally impractical. So yes, it is fact that history shows no evidence of this Austrian dogma of economics actually being practically useful in a severe economic depression. Historical examples show that cutting the budget this precipitously gets you larger future deficits. No crystal ball or magic 8-ball needed. Paul's tentative economic plan shows exactly what he would cut. Take a look.

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 You mean Webster Tarpley's version of history?

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 I mean documented, historical examples of fiscal austerity, where massive budget cuts lead inevitably to larger deficits and social unrest. This sort of austerity has caused instability and lower living standards in various countries. This is something that people around the world have an awareness of and protest against, regardless of Tarpley's particular account. It is ultimately a policy which serves the unscrupulous and rapacious creditors.

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 Social unrest, political and economic upheaval are inevitable. There are no solutions to this mess. If we continue down this profligate road that we are currently on, the end will be economic perdition. Ron Paul's plan will probably not work because there is no practical solution out of this. But if we have a person in there who respects the rule of law and the Constitution that will be much better than the fascist police state they are putting in place right now.

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 I dont see this unrest as inevitable. Easy solutions are usually not apparent, but certain policies have been proven effective in providing some measure of relief during depressions. Austrian economists theorize that creative destruction is necessary and after this you will get a recovery. The problem is, what if you happen to starve in the meantime. These social programs he wants to cut are what people depend on to survive in these tough times.

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 Unrest is already happening partner and you better prepare for even more. They are preparing now to take us to war. Jim Rickards just reported on kingworldnews that war has already begun. Nobody is gonna escape this without some pain. The question is are we gonna allow the very same people who caused all these problems to come in and offer their solutions?

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 This is a typical fearmonger mindset often promoted by infowars and many of his guests. They get you riled up about how martial law is 2 days away, then they advertise all this survivalist nonsense which is probobly quite lucrative. This idea that pain is necessary is also quite reactionary, and grounded in Austrian and Libertarian fantasies. Ron Paul's economic program is one of 'their solutions," which oligarchs use to perpetuate their rule.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@matthew1722 THE HISTORY OR ROME SHOULD SUFFICE.

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 If you study history, empires always end because they spread their armies too thin, they exhaust their resources, destroy their economy and their money. If you study history you will see that no country has every amounted this level of debt and if you add in the quadrillion in derivatives we might be approaching intergalactic records. There is no painless way out of this mess and its very likely there is no solution to this aside from total collapse.

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 Just because we have record levels of debt, largely maintaining an empire overseas, we should cut all our social programs to balance the budget and please the creditors? I am sorry but Americans who are struggling to survive should not be told they have the liberty to starve because of some abstraction called the free market. If Ron Paul will defend Romney's escapades at Bain capital, where will it end. Tomorrow will he be defending Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, or Dimon of JPMorgan.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle What you are preaching is just another ism, libertarianism, and Ron Paul's irrational economic ideas. People who depend on social programs should look less at what Ron Paul says, and more at his actual proposed cuts which, would have the effect of bleeding Americans dry. Your reactionary, reflexive fear of socialism hinders your understanding of what would really serve poor people. Ron Paul gives these people liberty and freedom to starve to death, and they buy into it.

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 free market? what are you talking about? this bangster planned implosion of the global economy to consolidate power and institute a fascist world dictatorship is free market? o my God. there are no painless solutions to this mess. The question is will be a free sovereign nation or will we be rolled over into a fascist police state ruled by bureaucrats in Beijing or Brussels?

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 This is my point, bankers like to call themselves the free market, when free markets are an ideological abstraction which cannot really exist in pure form. THis is a common fallacy among libertarians, that all government is bad, and that you can have a market without a strong national state to protect it. Truly free markets mean anything goes. Human trafficking, drug running, all legal in a "free market."

[mahavira108]

@matthew1722 Youre distorting the issue and demagoging. Ron Paul clearly said he doesnt know the details of what Romney did at Bain and doesnt endorse them. He was defending him for what he said in that speech which is how markets operate: if you dont like the job a company or someone is doing you find another company. be real. dont demagogue issues.

[matthew1722]

@mahavira108 You show a complete lack of understanding of what effect leveraged buyouts have on the real economy. Romney an co. get loans with little money down to buy out troubled companies. Then they sell off the assets, fire the workers, and steal and reduce pensions while putting that money as profit on their balance sheet. This is not a simple case of finding another company to bring your business to, these are the sort of companies and people we need to prosecute.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@mahavira108 Total brutal collapse is the answer. A so called "creative collapse" is just more bankster manipulation and it takes the spotlight off these people as criminals and attempts to put them into the light of  'helping out'. We need to round up these crooks any way possible and dump them into their FEMA camps while they await trial.

[mahavira108]

@thewhisperingeagle I agree with you completely. this whole thing is a planned bangster implosion.

[mahavira108]

@thewhisperingeagle and they should all be held accountable. prosecute fraud to the ultimate.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@matthew1722 Yeah, so let's vote for one of the fascist candidates who want to detain or murder you as a terrorist without trial - yeah....that's a good idea! Unlike Republicans or Democrats, Ron Paul isn't in this to get rich, and if you think that voting for a candidate from the establishment is going to protect your wealth - then P.T. Barnum vastly underestimated the birth rate of suckers.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle We don't have the luxury of being armchair political consumers and having the perfect candidate presented to us. Only so much can actually be accomplished through the electoral process. Although Ron Paul obviously has impeccable integrity and doesn't take bribes, his economic policies leave much to be desired. Most poor and working people don't have much wealth to be protected and are rather looking for relief from debt and foreclosure, which Paul would likely not support.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle This constitutional fetishism makes great stump speech material, but Ron Paul's understanding and interpretation of the constitution is more consistant with the principles of the Articles of Confederation and the anti-federalists. The constitution expanded government to a larger level which was deemed practical at that time. Ron Paul cites passages from the constitution which support his ideology, while ignoring those which contradict what he believes.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@matthew1722 I know the Constitution backward and forward. Name an article of the Constitution that would contradict one of Ron Paul's beliefs. Broad statements without citation are just wind. Seeing that you would have to actually read the document before you could even answer my challenge, I don't expect to ever hear from you again, substantively.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle Well for starters, let's take the general welfare clause from the preamble. Ron Paul's interpretation of this clause is far too narrow for a constitution which was meant to evolve over the centuries, and he is unlikely to use government intervention even when it would promote the general welfare of the nation.

[shenmueryu]

@matthew1722 How does government intervention promote general welfare? I hope you aren't talking about overseas? hell even here, government intervention to "keep us safe for terrorists" does that help? how about HUD, sounds reasonable right? until the underworld i.e. the mob gets involved. Those HUD scams are so open now they had an example of a fucking hud scam on the sopranos laying out how to get the jersey family fat pockets without having to do a single thing.

[matthew1722]

@shenmueryu When in an economic depression, social programs such as WIC, food stamps, unemployment insurance, social security, medicare/caid etc. are indispensible. To slash these programs so wrecklessly such as Ron Paul wants to do to food stamps, WIC, and unemployment would have demographic consequences resulting in death for the many people who currently rely on them. Furthermore, govt. intervention promotes the general welfare via science driver investments i.e the space program.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle There is also the 14th amendment, whihc states "the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,.... shall not be questioned." During the whole debt ceiling debacle of last year, Ron Paul and other various reactionaries were supportive of the United States defaulting on it's obligations, which would have been an unmitigated disaster, and quite probobly would have forced brutal austerity by default.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@matthew1722 Because the printing of money is unconstitutional and raising the debt ceiling is just another way of saying 'we're gonna print more money' which destroys what's left of the value of the paper fiat. You can't use the Constitution to criticize actions that oppose unconstitutional conduct. You really ought to read the thing - it is an iron clad document immune from interpretation, which is why they work so hard to undermine it.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle You pretend the FED needed this debt ceiling passed to pump more liquidity into the system. They can do so without a debt ceiling increase. The government needed this money to meet prior obligations which were made as part of public laws, such as social security, medicare, etc. A default would have given priority to the bankers you dislike so much, while punishing Americans who depend on social security, medicare, or any other form of govt. assistance.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle Furthermore, you are misreading the 1st artice, section 10 which states "No STATE shall... coin money; emit bills of credit; make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts;..." You don't seem to familiar with the Federalist or Anti-Federalist Papers, but if you ever read them, nowhere can be found an intention on the part of the founders to proscribe or prohibit the national govt. from using paper currencies. The constitution is interpretation.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@matthew1722 A paper note is fine as long as it represents a demand for payment in gold or silver. Without that - it's worthless to the Constitution.

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle Gold and silver can be successfully included in international trade policy, as a sort of reality principle to help when valuing different currencies. But simply having a gold/silver standard is not enough, the whole system of credit creation has to have some sort of popular oversight, so these decisions are made by the people, not oligarchs in smoke-filled, oak-paneled board rooms. Fiat currencies are not constitutionally prohibited, and have succeeded with proper oversight.

[thewhisperingeagle]

@matthew1722 Yeah, but all that manipulation requires bankers. The Money needs to be in control of the people and the bankers need to be in control of themselves, and invest in their own private shark tank with a thick wall between the economy and their parasitic gambling games. International trade policy should be ignored by the United States and anyone who wishes to sell their trinkets here in this country will pay tariffs, which will fund a huge percentage of our federal budget

[matthew1722]

@thewhisperingeagle "International trade policy should be ignored by the United States and anyone who wishes to sell their trinkets here in this country will pay tariffs,.." Certainly moderate tariffs on certain imports would be beneficial, but to ignore intl. trade policy would be less wise than, say, formulating an intelligent trade policy meant to squeeze out financial fraudsters. At an rate, you are correct in making the connection that parasitic speculation is a drag on the real economy.

[PurpleHoneyBear]

What can I say? Of course Tarpley is correct. It speaks to the dire scenario that the US is in that their best choice is Ron Paul. And he explains why very clearly in this interview.

[TheFooob]

Here is my view,

I wish Webster Tarpley could be a four-term President, but unfortunetly thats not going to happen, Ron Pauls economics are terrible, but he is very good on Civil Liberties and to an extent foreign policy, he will also Audit the Federal Reserve, he does have alot of flaws but there really is no choice, there is either Ron Paul or Obama?.

[ColtraneTaylor]

That said I'd like to see Tarpley and Paul discuss this directly. Would be most enlightening.

[ColtraneTaylor]

Tarpley is a far bigger ideologist than Paul and mixes in trash talk in with his hyper intellectualism. This is an example. Insinuating that Paul is more sinister than the super commitee. He has an extreme lack of wisdom in his outlandish statements and indicates a disorder on his part. In his joint interview with John Anthony West he showed himself to be the inferior person. I have two Tarpley uploads, but here I have to say, Fuck off Webster! Way to drag down the frogs leaping out of the well.

[hadith04]

@ColtraneTaylor

Russia Today supports Ron Paul, because Ron Paul will crash US economy, thus disabling US from joining the 3rd World War.

[ColtraneTaylor]

@hadith04 About your RT comment... that is truly lunacy.

[hadith04]

@ColtraneTaylor

Ron Paul himself said, "the plan will be painful for a while, after that we'll get recovery"

.

best case scenario it'll be like like after soviet union collapse, after 7-8years things recover.

.

It is best for you to prepare a 10year plan for your self. Get a farmland, and have guns, lots of guns, because those welfare zombies need food, and they'll do whatever to get it. all the best.

[ColtraneTaylor]

@hadith04 Wait... how come you're against 'welfar zombies' but also against RP's anti-welfare stance?

[hadith04]

@ColtraneTaylor

"welfare zombies" cannot steal a tank and crash in my house. maybe in Libya they can. american welfare zombies can't possibly steal a tank then crash into my house

.

maybe I should get a tank, what do you think? 2nd Amendment do not limits what arms I can have. Since Govt have been unconstitutional, we should get some RPGs and Bazookas.

[ColtraneTaylor]

Tarpley couldn't find anyone else to criticize? Someone who can stop loss of life AND boost the budget by doing it. Complaining because history has not shown that it can be done? His suggestion is that we do things based on history then? That's progress? Paul is making a huge call for people to help themselves AND each other. It's a great move forward for both the individual and society. You might even call say its step towards greater biological evolution - the elimination of all our fears.

[hadith04]

@ColtraneTaylor

history repeats itself is a problem, Ron Paul cuts = Heinrich Bruning cuts

food & water saves lives, death is a freedom, liberty from life.

[kkbose]

Paulbots don't like this video

[ZorkFrobozz]

I think people reclaiming their rights is essential. Even if this all the straw man arguments, misinterpretations, and accuracies were REAL, at least we would have a republic and the ability to modify it. This is far better than being the subjects of some oligarchy who has clearly shown it's concerned with only power and profit, regardless of any amount of death and misery to mankind.

[hadith04]

@ZorkFrobozz

bring a gun to a gunfight

bring a monster to a monster fight

bring oligarch to an oligarch fight, and they wipe out each other.

[EdmundMatthewsTVOW]

let mothers get their own protien , not goverments job

[hadith04]

@EdmundMatthewsTVOW

Like Gerald Celente always says, "when they lose everything, they lose it". and gonna come after you. Get you gun ready and shoots those mothers. Cheap and efficient Human depopulation.

[matthew1722]

@EdmundMatthewsTVOW Spoken like a true death cultist.

[sssssjjjj1]

THAT MEANS HEAD CUT 200 BILLION FROM MILITARY AND 100 MILLION FROM MEDICARE.. THE ALTERNATIVE IS THE BANKERS. THE WAR STARTERS. PAUL IS 10000000 TIMES THE MAN ANYONE IN THE RACE IS......OBAMA ISN'T EVEN LEGAL.

[sssssjjjj1]

GRIFFIN IS AFRAID OF THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM...DON'T YOU LOVE IT WHEN HE CALLS THE FED THE ANGLOSAXON BANKING...BLAH BLAH....IT'S FUNNY ALL 8 FAMS OF THE FED ARE ZIONIST JEWS 90% EUROPEAN. TELL ME ABOUT THE ANGLO BANKERS GRANDPAPPA PROPAGANDAPA!

[hadith04]

@sssssjjjj1

so they are all jews, but you will do nothing.

[sssssjjjj1]

guns and bulldung rather. hahah watch this youtube vid...i think you're afraid of it...NYPD POLICE TRANSMISSION MURAL VAN MOSSAD.

[sssssjjjj1]

at least with Paul the robbery will stop....if you can't see the dems and repubs are just slaves to the cfr which is run by the british/zionist jew banker kabal! stop dreaming......these are the bolsheviks at the gates.

[hadith04]

@sssssjjjj1

Ron Paul will not stop it. Ron Paul's Government will not intervene in the Market. Even if the Judiciary is still standing, they'll be bought.

[Colinej08]

Stick to foreign policy... Socialism doesn't work there is no productivity! Id LOVE to see Webster debate Peter Schiff!!! Would be an AWESOME debate

[ckairnes68]

I don't imagine the faithful Alex Jones listeners are going to enjoy this. It's a hard critique to digest. My faith is not in any man to save us. I leave that to my God. No matter how you look at it, We're in for a bumpy ride.