What this country needs is a MARRIAGE PROTECTION ACT that makes it illegal for a homosexual to marry a heterosexual. It would prevent the marriages that are most likely to end in divorce, most likely to ruin lives and most likely to lead to biological children being molested.
OK so you dont want to include gay people in marriage because you say it redifines it, But you have no problem redifining the constitution which is there to protect people, This guy is ignorant and its sad hes in a political office. I used to live in Indiana and im ashamed of this man
Being alive is fucking dangerous... Oppressing a groups civil liberty just because they are gay is fucking oppression. sure it may be a bit disturbing but hey so is the fact that people drink, or hell skydive.
thats why people in my country make fun of the people in the west who don't even know how to defind morality for themselves sad soo immoral they going back to the jungle laws were there is no limits humans sexual actions!!!! WEIRD to even think about u Westren people!!!!
Dangerous? Dangerous like how? Dangerous like it spreads and contaminants are children? Bull shit. Dangerous because of STDs? Are you aware that the majority of STDs are transmitted by straight couples, and that they're just as there, if not more, then gay couples? Dangerous like they're going to hell? So are you for being such a biggot.
Weird? Oh, right, being gay is weird. The fact that something is strange is a great reason to take rights away. You know, like the KKK did with the blacks! Or that the American Government did to the Native Americans. You know. THAT. Because if it's not exactly like me, it doesn't deserve the freedoms I have. And trust me, most gays don't see you as too "normal" either.
Goddammit, fine, I will. Unnatural? ARE YOU SERIOUS? Are all the lights ON UPSTAIRS? God DAMN. Animal species all across the world are GAY. Especially Primates. Do you even DO YOUR RESEARCH?!
That's unquestionably untrue. It's generally accepted in many cultures around the world, including europe and canada. There have been several cultures that considered it to be preferable, and one where it's the norm, and opposite gender couples come together only to have children, and must part with anger and recriminations immediately afterward. Get real: you don't know what you're talking about.
In conclusion, then, African American female "lifestyle" is immoral and dangerous, since a large percentage of black women have AIDS; while same-sex female relationships are the most moral and safe "lifestyles," since that group is the least likely demographics to contract AIDS.
Furthermore, if likelihood of AIDS contraction is an indicator of morality, then African American women, who are contracting AIDS most rapidly in America today, shouldn't have sex with whomever they're having sex with, either.
You made me laugh, too, so I guess we're even. Your childlike observations of the real world are questionable. In one fell swoop, you just promoted same-sex female relationships, as those are less likely than their mixed-sex counterparts to contract ANY STD, including AIDS. (For the record, there's no such thing as something called "anal cancer." Do you mean prostate cancer? That isn't an STD, champ...)
And historically, especially in ancient Greece, East Asia and amongst many early Native American tribes, homosexuality was either seen as something positive or, at worst, something that was a non-issue (people just didn't obsess over it like they do now). People don't' just randomly hate things just for the sake of hating things, and it's obnoxiously anti-intellectual for you to suggest otherwise.
And as a history major, I'm disgusted by your idiotic "gay is wrong all times, in all cultures" statement. This is grossly incorrect. It's mostly abhorred in uneducated, third world cultures; while more developed, affluent democracies tend to be much more receptive to it (compare Nigeria to Canada, for example).
What the fuck does that have to do with my comment? I'm making fun of the fact that, as you just pointed out, people are constantly shifting their arguments around and adopting new ones in terms of same-sex attractions to show why they think it's wrong.
The funny thing is that many politicians who oppose gay marriage probably don't even give a crap. They just know that most Americans are stupid little sheep, who can be manipulated into voting conservative if their bigotry and fear is used against them.
voters can be nasty in private. You are not picking on just gay?, we will be fair and vote on everyone's rights (Irish need not apply,etc.),slavery,interacial marriage,fair trial,equal housing,equal lending, whites at back of bus in some cities(blacks in others).Courts protect minorities from the majority for equality under the law because the majority won't. It has been a few years since gay marriages were performed in MA. Did hell break out? or was it the Y2K bug all over again?
Information for those who think Massachusetts supports gay marriage. The people of Massachusetts has never supported gay marriage,although some residents may support gay rights. The estimated 4.1 million registered voters never voted and supported gay marriage in Massachusetts! It was decided by the Massachusetts legislature. It may go a ballot in 2008 where the voters can decide to keep gay marriage legal in Massachusetts. I'm a heterosexual Democrat who supports my Governor Deval Patrick.
The Christian view on homosexuality is one of the hardest areas of faith for me, personally. I don't know the truth yet, but I can tell you that Chrisitians need to work on their divorce rate and own family problems before they start telling others they can't get married. The sanctity of marriage needs to be defended at home with heterosexuals, before you even THINK of speaking about homosexuals.
This has been flagged as spam show
What this country needs is a MARRIAGE PROTECTION ACT that makes it illegal for a homosexual to marry a heterosexual. It would prevent the marriages that are most likely to end in divorce, most likely to ruin lives and most likely to lead to biological children being molested.
guardian22222 4 years ago
hes crazy and he thinks he can force his opinion in law, its horrible he changed the constituion which is there to protect no discriminate
bilmar78 4 years ago
Hi im Joe brown and I approve this message,,,
conservatives in washington want to force texas style discrimination bills on the people of indiana ...
to stop conservative judges from forcing hate on hoosiers the represenatives have said by changing the constitution it will make some feel better..
Thank you GO EQUALITY GO PEACE OR GO HOME
JoeyBoya 4 years ago
OK so you dont want to include gay people in marriage because you say it redifines it, But you have no problem redifining the constitution which is there to protect people, This guy is ignorant and its sad hes in a political office. I used to live in Indiana and im ashamed of this man
bilmar78 4 years ago
Being alive is fucking dangerous... Oppressing a groups civil liberty just because they are gay is fucking oppression. sure it may be a bit disturbing but hey so is the fact that people drink, or hell skydive.
Alexodia 4 years ago
No more dangerous than Fighting a war id say. Oh wait more people die a day in Iraq or die in LA than homosexuals.
Alexodia 4 years ago
whatever u say they will try to blame it on CHRISTIANS not gays!!! somehow they manage to do soo, and don't ask me how lol!!!!
DODO1777 4 years ago
thats why people in my country make fun of the people in the west who don't even know how to defind morality for themselves sad soo immoral they going back to the jungle laws were there is no limits humans sexual actions!!!! WEIRD to even think about u Westren people!!!!
DODO1777 4 years ago
Guess thats why were Militarily and civily superior to anyone else. Is our capability to accept a minority.. Go The West
Alexodia 4 years ago
WOW U THINK U R SUPERIOR TO OTHER HUMANS ISN'T THAT SOOO HUMANITARIAN!!!!! HITLER BELIEVED THAT tOOOO!!!!
DODO1777 4 years ago
Dangerous? Dangerous like how? Dangerous like it spreads and contaminants are children? Bull shit. Dangerous because of STDs? Are you aware that the majority of STDs are transmitted by straight couples, and that they're just as there, if not more, then gay couples? Dangerous like they're going to hell? So are you for being such a biggot.
END. OF. DISCUSSION.
KyoraMishiso 4 years ago
Weird? Oh, right, being gay is weird. The fact that something is strange is a great reason to take rights away. You know, like the KKK did with the blacks! Or that the American Government did to the Native Americans. You know. THAT. Because if it's not exactly like me, it doesn't deserve the freedoms I have. And trust me, most gays don't see you as too "normal" either.
KyoraMishiso 4 years ago
lol I realy don;t care how they see me LMAO!!!!!!
DODO1777 4 years ago
Goddammit, fine, I will. Unnatural? ARE YOU SERIOUS? Are all the lights ON UPSTAIRS? God DAMN. Animal species all across the world are GAY. Especially Primates. Do you even DO YOUR RESEARCH?!
KyoraMishiso 4 years ago
You should accept that people dislike you because you are ignorant, stupid and foolish.
Homosexuality is NONE of those things. And DAMN YouTube's 500 charactor limit, lest I tear your statement into shreds.
KyoraMishiso 4 years ago
Why do they call it a marriage "protection" act, when what it does is prevent innnocent people from being able to marry?
tmf866 5 years ago
That's unquestionably untrue. It's generally accepted in many cultures around the world, including europe and canada. There have been several cultures that considered it to be preferable, and one where it's the norm, and opposite gender couples come together only to have children, and must part with anger and recriminations immediately afterward. Get real: you don't know what you're talking about.
tmf866 5 years ago
In conclusion, then, African American female "lifestyle" is immoral and dangerous, since a large percentage of black women have AIDS; while same-sex female relationships are the most moral and safe "lifestyles," since that group is the least likely demographics to contract AIDS.
megalosaniac 5 years ago
Furthermore, if likelihood of AIDS contraction is an indicator of morality, then African American women, who are contracting AIDS most rapidly in America today, shouldn't have sex with whomever they're having sex with, either.
megalosaniac 5 years ago
You made me laugh, too, so I guess we're even. Your childlike observations of the real world are questionable. In one fell swoop, you just promoted same-sex female relationships, as those are less likely than their mixed-sex counterparts to contract ANY STD, including AIDS. (For the record, there's no such thing as something called "anal cancer." Do you mean prostate cancer? That isn't an STD, champ...)
megalosaniac 5 years ago
And historically, especially in ancient Greece, East Asia and amongst many early Native American tribes, homosexuality was either seen as something positive or, at worst, something that was a non-issue (people just didn't obsess over it like they do now). People don't' just randomly hate things just for the sake of hating things, and it's obnoxiously anti-intellectual for you to suggest otherwise.
megalosaniac 5 years ago
And as a history major, I'm disgusted by your idiotic "gay is wrong all times, in all cultures" statement. This is grossly incorrect. It's mostly abhorred in uneducated, third world cultures; while more developed, affluent democracies tend to be much more receptive to it (compare Nigeria to Canada, for example).
megalosaniac 5 years ago
What the fuck does that have to do with my comment? I'm making fun of the fact that, as you just pointed out, people are constantly shifting their arguments around and adopting new ones in terms of same-sex attractions to show why they think it's wrong.
megalosaniac 5 years ago
The funny thing is that many politicians who oppose gay marriage probably don't even give a crap. They just know that most Americans are stupid little sheep, who can be manipulated into voting conservative if their bigotry and fear is used against them.
urinferior1212 5 years ago
voters can be nasty in private. You are not picking on just gay?, we will be fair and vote on everyone's rights (Irish need not apply,etc.),slavery,interacial marriage,fair trial,equal housing,equal lending, whites at back of bus in some cities(blacks in others).Courts protect minorities from the majority for equality under the law because the majority won't. It has been a few years since gay marriages were performed in MA. Did hell break out? or was it the Y2K bug all over again?
Anaka7of9 5 years ago
Information for those who think Massachusetts supports gay marriage. The people of Massachusetts has never supported gay marriage,although some residents may support gay rights. The estimated 4.1 million registered voters never voted and supported gay marriage in Massachusetts! It was decided by the Massachusetts legislature. It may go a ballot in 2008 where the voters can decide to keep gay marriage legal in Massachusetts. I'm a heterosexual Democrat who supports my Governor Deval Patrick.
Underdog263 5 years ago
1986: "AAAHHH!! Homosexuality is immoral because all Homosexuals(TM) want to do is have unrestrained sex with each other!!"
2006: "AAAHHH!! Homosexuality is immoral because all Homosexuals(TM) want to do is form loving, committed, monogamous bonds together!!"
megalosaniac 5 years ago
The Christian view on homosexuality is one of the hardest areas of faith for me, personally. I don't know the truth yet, but I can tell you that Chrisitians need to work on their divorce rate and own family problems before they start telling others they can't get married. The sanctity of marriage needs to be defended at home with heterosexuals, before you even THINK of speaking about homosexuals.
/off soapbox
kneeyul 5 years ago
Lets continue to write more hate into the consitution! Disgusting!
akray187 5 years ago
disgusting. taking a real couple and putting a big red line through them.
missapple22002 5 years ago
what about a law that would keep the divorce rate down?
freundtraub 5 years ago