America has a separate of religion and state institutions; the very definition of secular. Yet Ann is so deeply invested in conservatism that the word secular has become a pejorative. For that reason Ann will spin circles to avoid associating of America with secularism.
Your muddled mix of fuzzy notions is what's spinning in circles.
America is one of the most religious nations on Earth. It was settled & founded by people so religious they left civilization for the liberty to worship. The founding states had established churches. The religious basis of our founding principles are explicitly stated in our founding declaration.
We merely deny the federal gov't the authority to establish a federal church. Read Coulter's "Godless: The CHURCH OF LIBERALISM".
All cheer the Charles Krauthammer/Ann Coulter Republican ticket for 2016!!! These two would be the perfect pair for the job. Get your nominations in now!!!
Again, my point is that our Founding Fathers did not seem to have a problem with referencing our Creator (..."endowed ...with certain inalienable rights", etc....), they also allowed Judeo-Christian symbols to be carved into gov't buildings....and they didn't have problem with it. I don't think that the use of these symbols "established religion" and I don't think the Founding Fathers thought so either or they wouldn't have allowed it.
My point about the term "Separation of Church and State" is still valid. I don't believe that the way many people interpret that phrase is the way the Founding Father' -in particular....Jefferson...who is the one who originated the phrase in a letter- meant it to be interpreted....otherwise they would not have allowed Judeo - Christian symbols to be engraved, painted, etc on many of our gov't buildings.
Again, I just think the Founding Fathers had a totally different meaning of the of what we are calling "separation of church and State" (....even though-again- none of our Founding Documents ever uses this term....it was in a letter from Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Church). If they had NOT wanted faith/religion/etc. to have any influence on our government they would not have allowed the Judeo-Christian symbols to be engraved/painted/etc. on our government buildings.
I don't think equality of human beings is solely a Christian belief... nor do I think the mention of "God" in the Constitution defines how we interpret religion as a nation, today.
The phrase "separation of Church and State" never appears in our founding documents. It appeared in a letter by Thomas Jeffereson - who actually advocated and expressed that public schools should have the Bible taught....even though he himself was not a traditional Christian. The phrase phrase appeared in was to the Danbury Baptist Church. There was lso more to the phrase, which supported the idea that the government should not suppress "the free expression [of religion] thereof".
To worship freely without government sanctioned religion was the pilgrims' primary reason for leaving England.
From Wickipedia:
"The separation of church and state is a legal and political principle derived from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . ."
Didn't Ann Coulter specialize in Consitutional law?
what i said has nothing to do with black people. The confederates believed in SLAVERY. No matter what race is enslaved it is still wrong. Black are more likely to be put in prison because they grow up in poverty strunken places like detroit and inner cities where alot of crime surronds them.
There is a strong connection between poverty and crime, and who would have thought, there are more minorities in poverty than whites.Oh, and not to mention that black people are statistically more than twice as likely to get pulled over and are arrested and charged way more often for the SAME crimes that white people commit, creating a higher crime statistic.
Are you implying that crime is an inherent attribute of black people? You've got to be fucking kidding me. Go read a sociology book.
Whow, harsh. To most people, the left looks very good. Obama won this election by quite a margin. You may claim the new kids who voted are uneducated, but I'm fairly sure that the same was said in 2000 and 2004 about old conservative voters.
Any credibility your arguments MIGHT have had diminishes in the light of this bias.
"To most people, the left looks very good" -- In fact, according to the latest bipartisan Battleground poll, "most people" (60%) do NOT think so.
"Obama won this election by quite a margin" -- 53%-46%, which doesn't make the Top 5 list. And so only with Obama's ACORN army, & after McCain-Feingold criminalized most funding sources of political speech. Thus, America chose Liberal only over McLiberal.
"kids who voted are uneducated" -- yes, demonstrably.
OH MY GOD how can any human possibly be SO ignorant?! Most of our founding fathers were deists, and the seperation of church in state is essential to the Constitution. HOW could she not know this.
Thomas Paine? You havn't read any of his books have you? Thomas Paine was the biggest Deist of them all. He was extremely open about his Deist beliefs. "The Age of Reason," is one of his most popular ones next to "Common Sense". In the book, as well as many others, he talks heavily against organized Religion being involved in politics.
thats just so hypocritical for the country to be founded on such ideals when we are guilty of a heinous sinful injustice such as enslaving a people. lets keep religion out of this
It wasn't "hypocritical" to defeat the Democrat Slave States and abolish their slave based rule, which was totally contradictory to the ideals upon which America was founded.
Don't smear all of America with Democrat's rich history of "guilt of a heinous sinful injustice".
As for "keep religion out of this", that's not possible when debunking Democrats who keep dragging religion back in so they can rewrite the historical record of our Christian nation.
You really have no idea what the Constitution says. Look up the exact language instead of trying to fake it on a public forum.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" -- 1st Amnd
Last I heard, homosexuality is not a religion. Personally, I dont care if gay people marry. I am just trying to encourage you to form beter arguments, rather than to swallow the typical leftist nonsense
"...cant have religious laws (like a ban on gay marriage)"
Human anatomy isn't religion. Unlike Liberal mystics who proselytize a "rainbow of genders", civilized man knows there are only two sexes, male & female. (Have your mommy explain the rest.)
Then again, if Democrats had the capacity to discriminate religion from politics or science, then they wouldn't be Democrats.
Why do you think most people want gay marriage to be banned? Because they think no more people will be born? No, its because the old-testament says a man shall not lie with another man. Other than that statement the rest of what you siad makes little sense
Upon what do you base your claimed clairvoyance of everyone's reasoning on the topic, and what would lead you to conclude that a nation of citizens hold but a single reason for anything?
Your claims are as baseless as your conclusions are nonsensical.
Regardless of anyone's reasoning for voting as they do, the fact remains that America has spoken over and over and over again on the matter, and America decisively and overwhelmingly rejects the cultural perversity of "gay marriage". Get over it.
I believe I said most, I never said everyone thinks one thing. America once spoke overwhelmingly for slavery not to be abolished, so we should have stopped fighting for that? It's not the same thing, but all gays want is to be able to be with the person they love, and they're not going to stop fighting for that.
No, America NEVER "once spoke overwhelmingly for slavery ...". The DEMOCRAT Slave States did, claiming it as one of their "rights", to America's horror.
Today, Democrats continue to proudly enforce their "affirmative" racism against a rainbow of races, religions, and whatever else suits their whimsy.
Democrats have a rich history of enforcing their depravities by government force, and under ridiculous claims of "rights".
Back to your claim, whether all or most, upon what do you base that?
Before there were democrats and republicans, most americans were for slavery(in the late 1700's until mid 1800's). Also you cant compare the parties of the 1800s to the parties of today, theyre completely different.
Upon what do I base that? By talking to a bunch of people, and also because there's no rational argument against gay marriage besides religion.
Contrary to Democrat mythology, endlessly reciting your lies fail to make them any less so. America won; Democrats lost.
"...you cant compare..."
I just did. From which the rich history and continued trend of Democrat treachery against America is clear. Again, your response to my observations is reliably void of logic, reason, common sense, and lessons of history.
Attempting to forbid my comparison, and by decree, as you just did, is just plain silly.
you are incorrect in this statement. America did speak overwhelmingly for slavery, which includes many Northern States. That is one of the reasons Lincoln was hated so much in his time, because of work to end slavery. The war was based primarily on restoring the Union, not slavery. Slavery was a back issue. Many people are missunderstood when they discuss the civil war and the civil war era.
I think you're showing ignorance here. Most were not deists, and a deist believes that there is a God. It's interesting to see people use that word suggesting it is a bad thing. Secondly "separation of church and state" isn't in the Constitution. It was found in a letter from Jefferson. The context was that Jefferson didn't want the gov't meddling in church business. Now you and a lot of other misinformed people have it 180 degrees out of phase, trying to redefine it.
But Jefferson wanted that phrase to create a seperation between church and state that's what it said in his letter, which means the text in the constitution was intended to creat a seperation from church and state
Obama's socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the "champions" of "Chicago's democratic left" and a long-time socialist activist.
Well guess what, Anne? Democrats are now Republicans - yep - no difference b/t the two anymore - they both cheat, steal and maim, look at our poster boy from MA -TED "THE MURDERER" KENNEDY. Brain tumor - no problem - I'll die right after I put a nigger in the white house.
America was founded on Judeo-Christian ideals. The reason America's founding fathers were so revolutionary was that they implemented the Christian belief that all people are equal and should only answer to God thus creating a democracy. Every form of government comes from a governing philosophy. Many of which come from religions. Democracy comes from a very basic Christian philosophy. Admitting this does not mean an endorsement of theocracy. Its just respect for what America was founded on.
Yes and while were at it why dont we strap on the suicide bombs and burn churches and HEY! while we are at THAT!, we could elect a communist. Maybe a man of steel? I hear that worked wonders over in eastern europe! Naww, lets just go with throwing them all in to concentration camps and get them to work on new ways to kill babys and weave rainbow colored flags! oh boy that sure gets me optimistic about our country. (sarcasm)<-- Had to make sure that was in a language liberals could understand.
Have you read the Constitution? The Bill of Rights? Notably the 1st Amendment? Mentioning God does NOT mean that we are a Christian nation. Sorry. Washington was entitled to his beliefs as a man and a President. Freedom from religion is a foundation for our great nation. And we all have our mythologies don't we?
This country was not founded on Christian ideals. No kidding. Really. Read the documents that form the basis of our government. Read some of the letters of our founding fathers. A Creator gives us freedom to be free from religion as well as freedom of religion.
Given Muslim's 1,400+ yr war against all people of all religions, now spreading to all continents, the liberal use of hydrogen bombs throughout West Asia and North Africa is certainly "justified".
The US government spending our blood and treasure trying to build Iraq into a civilized nation is just a waste of resources. I'm all for pulling out and using hydrogen bombs. You?
I was just reading your comments. I havn't read them all, but what i have read right now... you are 100% correct on every single point.
Islam is an inherently wicked religion. In modern islam, women are considered as less than lifestock. The Koran teaches this. Mohammed was a child molestor. "Modern islam" is an oxymoron, because Islam is stuck in the Dark Ages. Only in Islam would a 6 year old be "married" to a 30 year old. At least in Hinduism, they marry the 6 year old to another 6 year old.
continued.... it is sad that you are consumed with hatred and yet you fail to recognise how contradictory this is to the Christian ideal. You have brought Christianity into politics and lowered to a disgusting level, knowing obviously very little of scripture, which is supposedly the sole basis of Republican evangelical study. I hope you realise your hatred relects nothing of the Christian message and your misguided nature somehow leads you to realization of yor own "depraved" ignorance.
I haven't mentioned Christianity except to the extent necessary to expose your gibberish whenever you lean on it. A review of our posts shows it is you who leans on your bizarre interpretations of Christianity to prop up your pro-Islamist rhetoric. You're projecting.
tylernull, this is my last post. I respect your opinion, even though I think you are wrong. I believe you are ignorant as you refuse to look from any side but your own. you think i am ignorant for doing so. I do resepct human life, in how i conduct myself and my arguments. some day i hope you visit another country and realise America is not the only country in the world, whether they are the most powerful or not. westo-centrism has consumed you to a "depraved" degree. depravity is your undoing.
Try REASON. You have yet to explain how you can respect life without valueing it enough to fight for it. You have attempted to circumvent the issue by declaring the global war against humanity, by Islam, as the fault of its victims. It isn't.
furthermore tylernull, on the iarq civilian point. read my comment, i did not say anything about "attacking civilians" you obviously did not read my comment!
Yes, you did. Further, your statements consistently paint a picture of your Islamist darlings as the innocent victims, and Western civilization as the aggressor. You also suggest that defending mankind from the fascist plague of Islam is immoral. You also imply there is no global facsist plague, but rather a few "elite". Everything you post is a lie; everything you post is entirely aligned with the Islamist fascists; everything you post is depraved, and a betrayal of humanity.
yes the more often you say "depraved" the more you convince me of your view! i am not implying "surrender". you have failed to look at the reasons why an elite group of Muslims hate western society, whilst at the same time alienating the rest of Islamic society. you should study the theology of Islam, then you would understand their religion and not discourse in such an ignorant manner. i agree, there is most definitely a problem, but the Iraq warhas done nothing to help this.!
The more you recite Islamist propaganda, the more I am convinced you are a dhimmified socialist or an Islamist. Civilized man didn't fret over why Nazis hated us and we don't need to fret over that of the current fascist plague of Islam. We can fight back or surrender to it. Fascists remove your fantasies of an alternative.
I simply reject the idea that you are as ignorant of the world around you as your posts would have me believe.
Furthermore, the defense of western civilization and "the most innocent of human life are congruent". please do not tell me your are somehow here equating the two? how does defense of western civilization concur with defending abortion. It is the defense of LIFE, not "our" life or "their" lives, but LIFE in its entirety as created by God himself.
Defending the human fetus is the OPPOSITE of "defending abortion".
Claiming to defend human life whilst deriding those who protect it, as you've been doing here for days now, is fatuous. Life is being taken even as you call for submitting to more of the same. Passively submitting to the global fascist plague of Islam doesn't protect human life; anyone's, including those of Muslims. Islamists are warring on all of mankind. Your implied suggestion that we surrender to them is depraved.
just to correct myself tyler, in my previous comment about abortion, i meant to say "western civilization concur with the most innocent of human life"-apologies. i did not mean concurrent with defending abortion, just to correct myself on that point as in your preious comment you discussed defense of the most innocent of humankind etc.
so what about the people of iraq who are defending their families against american troops who have invaded a sovereign nation? are the civilians not innocent? and yet we hear so much about the "murder" of american soldiers. my goodness, again, ignorance at its very best! you need to remove yourself from this "them" and "us" nonsense before it ties you in a knot of hatred and I am not against the american troops who believe they are there for good reasons,they have been misled by the government)!
"what about the people of iraq who ..." -- the people of Iraq are the ones fighting on our side of this war, unlike Western Leftists & their Islamist buddies. You recite enemy propaganda about our side "attacking civilians", though you know that's but a nest of lies. Your rhetoric and that of Islamists is indistinguishable. By your prattle, the US also "invaded" France during WWII; another "sovereign nation". Your pro-Islamist rhetoric is just a nonsensical betrayal of humanity, at best.
are you serious? I am not even american and yet I am leftist? hilarious. i am not pro-Islamist, I am pro life. again, you know nothing of Islamist religion, and also , by the "rhetoric of your" prattle, nothing of the Christian message either. go study the theology and then come back and argue. IGNORANCE!
"not even american and yet I am leftist" -- they aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, American Leftists learned their socialist ways from socialist Europe.
You neither value life nor save it by deriding those who fight for your right to belittle and slander them as they do so. There is nothing moral, or of the Chrisitan ideal, about your politics, especially those of your fantastical notions regarding mankind's struggle against Islamic fascism.
i cannot fathom how people support the majority of ann coulters views. how can she be so anti-abortion, and yet support the war, despite her apparent pro life status. war kills many many people! its just hypocritical nonsense! the iraq war is a disaster. i am religious by the way before anyone starts talkin nonsense to me about being a liberal immoral so and so. at least im consistent in my views!
The defense of the most innocent of human life and the defense of Western Civilization are congruent.
You are obviously in favor of abortion, so you too are willing to kill. The only difference is your preference is to kill the most innocent of human life, and to passively watch the victims of Muslim savagery as they are slaughtered.
Thus, your "religion" (Liberalism) is certainly rife with hypocrisy, but more notable is its abject depravity.
Eh, No actually, I am not pro-abortion. I am vehemently opposed to abortion and to war, as they are bother murdering human life!! how do you reconcile the two? i respect ALL human life, and my point is the hypocrisy of republicans who support this disastrous war and yet are so opposed to abortion. again, at least i am consistent with my views. i suppose i am still a liberal according to you? jesus replaced the 10 commandments with 2: love your god and love your neighbour. from a roman catholic.
"how do you reconcile the two?" -- I just explained the congruence of the two, but I'll offer another perspective.
You claim to respect human life, but don't value it enough to defend it against those warring on us. Defending innocent life isn't "murder", even if that includes killing people. There's a difference. Your inability to discriminate between the two isn't evidence of a hypocrisy in those less unfortunate. The only consistency in your views is moral equivocation, which is depraved.
Actually THAT was a f*cking great joke! High Court hahahahahaha!!! Not bad (1.05 in link) Please don't make me break with Liberal tradition and watch Faux ;-)
Ms. Coulter sometimes seems harsh [ her comments about 9/11 widows gave me pause, but I soon forgave her as I know she is of Christ]but I know we would all be safer, here in America, if our president Bush did actually bomb the Middle East and encourage the survivors to accept Our Lord and Savior. Thank you.
I really hope you're kidding. That people could think that the US President should spread Christianity by bombing people??
And surely you don't believe she is of Christ. Read some things that Christ said and then read some things that Coulter says, and you will be hard pressed to find any relation between them except that she claims to follow him while she completely contradicts his teachings.
Republicans and their big talk of having a small govt that doesn interfere in peoples lives.
then they ban abortion, gay marriage, the right to Habeas Corpus, private phone tapping, invading someone else's country for fun, creating the Patriot Act, stealing an election, torturing prisoners, keeping prisoners from going through the judicial system, blocking funds for scientific research, and scaring the shit out of its own citizens so theyd have a free pass for going to war.
"ban abortion" -- and premedited murder, kidnapping, rape, too.
"gay marriage" -- homosexuals have, can, and do marry, under the SAME RULES as everyone else. However, they don't have a "right" to use a driver's license to drive on the opposite side of the road, either.
"torture" -- in accordance with the Geneva Convention for those who fight like Muslim savages.
"blocking funds" -- NOT taking money FROM medical COMPANIES to squander on gov't stupidity.
The right cares so much about embryos that they completely disregard how the woman feels about it. Shouldn the "day after pill" be banned too? or does God only inject the soul a week later?
Gays who don live in California & Massachusetts, don have the same rights as others married people, and in 41 states gay marriage or anything like it is strictly forbbiden.
Article 13 Geneva Convention "Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated."
"embryos" -- thanks to Roe v. Wade, it is now illegal for Americans to vote on such matters. Liberals LOVE liberty only if it doesn't afftect their holy sacrament -- torturing the human fetus to death. Liberals have infinite compassion for the perp'; requiring them to be merciless toward its victims.
"Gays" -- SAME rights. SAME rules. I just explained that.
Article 13 -- No. The contract grants protections in exchange for rules of warfare; Islamist warfare is a violation of those rules.
Art17"No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war"
Nevertheless you still avoided the main issue, the exchange of our freedom for the so called "security"
Thomas J. said "freedom above all". The govt #1 job is to keep us free, and Bush little by little is takin that away from us. We're not safer in Iraq, we're not safer avoiding dialogue with nations
The Islamist enemy is in breech of any and all such contracts, assuming we have a contract with them, which we don't.
If you can grasp the most basic concept(s) of a contract, then you can see that inane tidbits plucked from an irrelevant one is nonsensical.
Your claim that I "still avoided the main issue" is rather silly since your scattered rants scurry across many topics, as is expected of Leftists as they try to avoid reality.
This "reality" you talk about, is it the reality that OReilly, Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Cheney, BUsh, the reality they preach?
or
The reality that neither Bin Laden nor WMDs exist in Iraq? The reality Al Qaeda is stronger now than its ever been?
The reality that from an average surplus in 2000, Bush put us in a debt of $9tri? The reality that Global warming is deteriorating our planet and Bush does next to nothing about it?
I live this reality too,however, I with many, intend to change it
I exposed the fallacies of your first three topics and you respond by launching a new flurry over an even broader range of topics.
Regarding just some of your latest fallacies on WMD and murderous Muslim sects at war with all of humanity, hundreds of chemical rounds have been found in Iraq since the war began, and al-Queda operatives were in Iraq before, during and afterwards. We have killed much of their leadership (20,000). Most importantly, they are THERE and not here since 2001.
Im sorry, so many things have gone wrong since Bush took office, it makes it hard to focus on a single issue, but Ill try. Prior 9/11, Bush received 5 different intelligence reports claimin there were 19 terrorists in America plotting a major attack involvin aircraft.Bush didn bother. After 9/11 he misleads us into Iraq.
Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda. Bushs foreign policy has only aggravated muslims everywhere. We had Global support against Osama, but Bush blew it by invading Iraq
everything that happened is because of clinton. bush got in office and had to try to fix everythnig clinton wrecked. it takes 4 years for a president to wreck the country & for us to be effected by it. in bush's 3rd year things got crappy. clinton wrecked us. the clintons opened all trade with china! enough said
Saddam was a secularist. He did not have al-qaeda in his country he would not have gotten along with Osama. al-qaeda came into Iraq when the US destabilized its governement.
man....these people r so silly...who the fuck doesnt do drugs..at the end of the day the true reality is that obama is black and these fucking boggpts dont want him as president full fucking stop.
Whenever anyone points out that Obama's circle of fiends are mostly from the kill-whitey sect of Liberalism, their instinctive idiocy requires them to say he's not black because his mother is white.
Of course, Dhimmi-crats are baseless, so they can aggressively reject logic and reason to claim he IS black.
Proselytize your racist gospel misery to your mommy, you shameless, Leftist scum -- yeah, that's triple redundancy. (You earned it.)
You seem to be filled with to much hate and too little wisdom. You probably feel it. Maybe you should spend less time reading your thesaurus, and more time researching humanity, not color.
Unable to go 7 seconds without raising the topic of their candidate's skin color, Democrats are left complaining about the manner in which we notice they do so.
With stunning speed, Obama & his circle of race hustling scum have reduced his own party to warring, tribal factions, each making threats & accusations at the other. Of course, they pause every now & then to accuse observers of being hateful, racist or stupid -- so they don't lose practice.
the polar bear is on the endangered species list ... they have been seen eating each other ... a shortage of food and ice ... and summer has just started ... so this bear swam 200 miles to iceland ... it was the first bear in over 15 years to do so ... but it was making land fall in a populated area and ran into a hail of gun fire when it reached iceland ... the whole incident was captured on video ... so if you know any polar bears ... tell them to walk a fine line if they are starving
We heard this same sort of gibberish whilst the Left were attempting to stop the Alaskan Pipeline.
Bears swim. Polar bears swim between continents. Carnivorous animals sometimes eat their young, though never to the extent that Liberals engage in the activity.
gm is closing down truck and suv plants ... the rushie neocons told you those were the best ... al gore was right ... the prius is the best ... clinton is quitting the race ... the rushies have been wrong, wrong soooo many times ... like when they committed treason during a war and turned in undercover cia operative valorie plame ... and look at what they are doing in the senate to kill the climate change bill .... it is part of their war on the law and on science ... they are wrong, wrong
GM can't compete because they have to pay more union workers who do NOT work anymore than do union workers who still work. Price fixing cartels are deadly.
What "the rushie neocons" told America is that your choice of cars shouldn't be dictated to you by the gov't, or Pope Albert Arnold "Celcius" Gore, Jr. and his carbon credits corporation that makes millions of dollars from his fascist scheme, where he prophesizes the weather 100,000+ hours from now.
I'm a republican, but I don't approve of republicans bringing religion into politics. It doesn't belong there, the constitution states that church and state should be separated. Let me use abortion as an example, I'm against it not because the church says it's wrong but by the fact that life is being taken away from a child. I believe in human rights, everybody's created equal, everybody deserves the same opportunities.
As we witness with Obama's circle of fiends from Trinity Divided, Democrats have no capacity to separate church and state. In fact, you can see Obama proselytizing to his flock in one of my videos:
"Obama's Hijack Attack".
Following those observations, we see that Liberalism is the theology that powers the Democrat(ic) Party. Theirs is federally enforced, from Protected (and unprotected) Class Law, to forcing US citizens to pay for their aggressive importation of illegal aliens.
Whenever Liberals recite that claim, I point out that modern Liberalism is the polar opposite of classical Liberalism. Contrasting the two is always fun, too.
Jonah Goldberg's book, "Liberal Fascism", dicusses the history thereof. I have a playlist, by that title, of a talk he gave on his book. He includes some interesting, lesser known, historical details, too.
Since when does having the words "by our Creator" imply that the Founding Fathers intending for us to be ruled by a minority of fanatical and intolerant Evangelical Christians?
Ohhh yes, you're sooooo right. I'm an easygoing Episcopalian moderate who respects the rights of others. That just SCREAMS fanatic!!! Besides, your little comment has all the argumentative weight of "I am rubber and you are glue..."
And Unfortuanately OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT OF GOVERNMENT IS GAY< which one of the founding fathers would have known that this would happen? WE LIVE IN THIS GAY REGIME< where things are flipped upside down, and inside out.
There is your BROAD meaning of a Faggot. Faggot or Gay or homosexualty in this case also applies to emotions, appearnaces, behavior, and especially Ideologies. Yes there are GAY MORALS GAY THOGUHTS AND GAY IDEOLOGIES!!!
So being a Christian, being a good citizen, paying taxes, loving family, standing up for national defense, personally opposing abortion...all these are gay thoughts and morals? Because I'm gay and I believe in them.
Obviously you are lost and confused, GET YOUR MORALS STRAIGHT!!! If you want to pick and point reasons to throw judgement at me, I have no time to waste, otherwise if you want to know how you are lost, READ MORE, ask me for Referrals!
Obama is a fag. And All Democrats. Since the liberals like to use broad meanings of words(or terms,definitions,etc.) Here are examples of a BROAD Meaning of Faggot: A Man that can not be the head of his own family, a man who obeys his wife, a mand who shares his manhood with his wife or girlfriend, etc.,etc.,etc.,
6. For those who vote based on FACTS rather than RHETORIC, Barack Hussein Obama's voting record is LEFT of Bernie Sanders the Vermont Senator who describes himself as a SOCIALIST!
For those supporters who think that Obama is going to make change, they are EXACTLY right he will make CHANGE but it will most assuredly be for the WORSE!
These idiots that FOLLOW AIMLESSLY behind there new DEMIGOD say he will work with ALL to promote change.
9 / 11 happened because clintion didnt anything to stop islamic terrorrists, then he was too busy with lewinsky, did clinton anything against terrorists? leftist pinky liberals are the best friend of islamics
"I sincerely esteem it [US Constitution] a system which without the finger of GOD, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests."
-- Alexander Hamilton
"It is impossible to rightly govern the world without GOD and Bible."
-- George Washington
"Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of GOD and nature."
-- Benjamin Franklin
There's a whole lot of "God" amongst our Christian founders.
You made an invalid claim, and those quotes show just how false it is -- yours is mythology. The founders obviously did NOT avoid "the use of the word 'God'"
"There isn't in the Constitution." -- so what? What's your point?
Regardless of what Deists and Secularists do or do not believe, most all of our nations founders were Christians. The Left's latest marketing campaign, while a popular fad, is simply a lie.
I wonder why the right in our country spend so much time fighting theocracies while trying to install one in the USA. If the Fundamentalists hate America so much, why don't they leave? Ron Paul is right. You have lost complete and utter respect fo the US Constitution. So what? What's the point? It is our FOUNDING DOCUMENT.
By the way, God Bless John McCain. Should he become President, watch him devout his attention and administration to politics as opposed to the second coming of Christ.
You began by posting a myth, which I debunked, and you've since made increasingly bizarre claims. Your latest being a slander of some ill-defined category of Americans, apparently for their "crime" of being a US citizen whilst Christian.
And all, now evident, for the purpose of deriding any and all who favor victory over the global Islamist plague.
Paul'ers are just nascent leftists in training -- entirely aligned with the enemy, as is required of their ilk.
That our country was founded on secular principles and that our founding fathers - most famous Jefferson - were Deists is hardly a myth. The fact that you ignore the Constitution in your citations and marginalize it is glaring. I will not argue to prove facts on a youtube comment board. Renew your library card or go back to highschool.
I am a Christian. But I am also an American. They are hardly mutually exclusive. As are Secularist and Religious.
Our founders -- all but two -- were self professed Christians, including Jefferson. I already debunked your bit of mythology in that regard.
That the constitution forbids a state enforced religion doesn't change that. Nor does it change the fact that the founding ideal of our nation, including the US Constitution, is the Christian belief that the right to liberty is a gift from God, not from other men (government).
Again, Deists were Christians. And Deists were Secularists. They aren't mutually exclusive.
I believe it says "Our Creator." They were very specific in that document to AVOID the use of the word God for that very reason: their secularism. If they had said God, they would have meant God. Aren't you supposed to be the strict constructionalist type?
Ann doesn't need to paint liberals as godless; they do a good job of that themselves.
Liberals care so much about offending everyone, including people who have a seering hatred for us.
How can liberals be so anti-American?
cheluzal 1 year ago
America has a separate of religion and state institutions; the very definition of secular. Yet Ann is so deeply invested in conservatism that the word secular has become a pejorative. For that reason Ann will spin circles to avoid associating of America with secularism.
iMaDeMoN2012 1 year ago
@i
Your muddled mix of fuzzy notions is what's spinning in circles.
America is one of the most religious nations on Earth. It was settled & founded by people so religious they left civilization for the liberty to worship. The founding states had established churches. The religious basis of our founding principles are explicitly stated in our founding declaration.
We merely deny the federal gov't the authority to establish a federal church. Read Coulter's "Godless: The CHURCH OF LIBERALISM".
TylerNull 1 year ago
All cheer the Charles Krauthammer/Ann Coulter Republican ticket for 2016!!! These two would be the perfect pair for the job. Get your nominations in now!!!
harbar3000 1 year ago
shes not funny
roz123456 2 years ago
yes she is
mg100192 2 years ago
Repeat yourself much?
spikefivefivefive 2 years ago
Again, my point is that our Founding Fathers did not seem to have a problem with referencing our Creator (..."endowed ...with certain inalienable rights", etc....), they also allowed Judeo-Christian symbols to be carved into gov't buildings....and they didn't have problem with it. I don't think that the use of these symbols "established religion" and I don't think the Founding Fathers thought so either or they wouldn't have allowed it.
TeabagsandCrumpets 2 years ago 4
My point about the term "Separation of Church and State" is still valid. I don't believe that the way many people interpret that phrase is the way the Founding Father' -in particular....Jefferson...who is the one who originated the phrase in a letter- meant it to be interpreted....otherwise they would not have allowed Judeo - Christian symbols to be engraved, painted, etc on many of our gov't buildings.
TeabagsandCrumpets 2 years ago
Again, I just think the Founding Fathers had a totally different meaning of the of what we are calling "separation of church and State" (....even though-again- none of our Founding Documents ever uses this term....it was in a letter from Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Church). If they had NOT wanted faith/religion/etc. to have any influence on our government they would not have allowed the Judeo-Christian symbols to be engraved/painted/etc. on our government buildings.
TeabagsandCrumpets 2 years ago
Why did the pilgrims leave England for the New World?
For fun?
It was to establish a government that didn't sponsor religion.
"Founding Documents"?
You don't consider the Consitution and the Bill of Rights to be such documents?
First Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."
This is separation of church and state.
Maybe that's why Coulter doesn't practice law in her area of study:
She'd rather be a hypocrite who sells books to fanatics.
spikefivefivefive 2 years ago
I don't think equality of human beings is solely a Christian belief... nor do I think the mention of "God" in the Constitution defines how we interpret religion as a nation, today.
IndianVampire 2 years ago
She has a law degree yet has never heard of "Separation of Church and State"?
I guess you have selective memory when your goal is peddling books for a living instead of actually using your degree.
spikefivefivefive 2 years ago
JUNE 2009
Barack Hussein Obama: US "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world"
-- telegraph . co . uk
"The Emergence of President Obama's Muslim Roots"
-- abcnews . com
TylerNull 2 years ago
The phrase "separation of Church and State" never appears in our founding documents. It appeared in a letter by Thomas Jeffereson - who actually advocated and expressed that public schools should have the Bible taught....even though he himself was not a traditional Christian. The phrase phrase appeared in was to the Danbury Baptist Church. There was lso more to the phrase, which supported the idea that the government should not suppress "the free expression [of religion] thereof".
TeabagsandCrumpets 2 years ago
To worship freely without government sanctioned religion was the pilgrims' primary reason for leaving England.
From Wickipedia:
"The separation of church and state is a legal and political principle derived from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . ."
Didn't Ann Coulter specialize in Consitutional law?
Really sad.
spikefivefivefive 2 years ago
what i said has nothing to do with black people. The confederates believed in SLAVERY. No matter what race is enslaved it is still wrong. Black are more likely to be put in prison because they grow up in poverty strunken places like detroit and inner cities where alot of crime surronds them.
Budlord1028 2 years ago
There is a strong connection between poverty and crime, and who would have thought, there are more minorities in poverty than whites.Oh, and not to mention that black people are statistically more than twice as likely to get pulled over and are arrested and charged way more often for the SAME crimes that white people commit, creating a higher crime statistic.
Are you implying that crime is an inherent attribute of black people? You've got to be fucking kidding me. Go read a sociology book.
findingmelmo 2 years ago
yeah lol thats why all the southern states vote for republicans and don't alot of southern voters wear the confederate flag?
Budlord1028 2 years ago
Colmes is such a weak liberal. It makes me angry because he makes other liberals look bad. Take him off this show!
theillusionist017 3 years ago
He actually just left. He "retired" from the show.
rakrobn 3 years ago 2
thank god they took that stupid liberal of the show, he's a fuckin moron
silverandblackman1 3 years ago
they had him on there to make the left look bad
Qpakaveli 3 years ago
No one makes the Left look good.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Whow, harsh. To most people, the left looks very good. Obama won this election by quite a margin. You may claim the new kids who voted are uneducated, but I'm fairly sure that the same was said in 2000 and 2004 about old conservative voters.
Any credibility your arguments MIGHT have had diminishes in the light of this bias.
IndianVampire 2 years ago
"To most people, the left looks very good" -- In fact, according to the latest bipartisan Battleground poll, "most people" (60%) do NOT think so.
"Obama won this election by quite a margin" -- 53%-46%, which doesn't make the Top 5 list. And so only with Obama's ACORN army, & after McCain-Feingold criminalized most funding sources of political speech. Thus, America chose Liberal only over McLiberal.
"kids who voted are uneducated" -- yes, demonstrably.
"same was said " -- with no veracity.
TylerNull 2 years ago
Republicans couldn't do anything without pandering to religious conservatives.
rakrobn 3 years ago
it is their base... that's what politicians do.
rjmacc 3 years ago
Hannity is not a politician.
rakrobn 3 years ago
FYI, "Seperation of Church and State" Appears NOwhere in the constitution
GHboy2942 3 years ago
But it says freedom of religion, and if laws are based on religion there isnt a freedom of religion
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
Hey Ann- remember FREEDOM OF RELIGION? It's a good thing.
aliceevans82 3 years ago
Why I left the Republican Party.
Orgasmic45 3 years ago
OH MY GOD how can any human possibly be SO ignorant?! Most of our founding fathers were deists, and the seperation of church in state is essential to the Constitution. HOW could she not know this.
fortwashingtonzu 3 years ago
All but two founders, Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen, were Christian.
Find a new word with which to proselytize your Leftist gospel of lies -- "deist" is just plain stale.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Thomas Paine? You havn't read any of his books have you? Thomas Paine was the biggest Deist of them all. He was extremely open about his Deist beliefs. "The Age of Reason," is one of his most popular ones next to "Common Sense". In the book, as well as many others, he talks heavily against organized Religion being involved in politics.
Chsel88 3 years ago
It doesn't matter how many times Atheist apologists recite the "Deist" mantra, the historical record remains unchanged.
ALL BUT TWO of America's founders (Paine, Allen) where self-professed Christians.
America was founded on Christian ideals of a Christian people, and remains to this day a Christian nation, to the dismay of Liberals.
It is because we are a Christian nation that we forbid the hired help (government) from federally establishing a church.
TylerNull 3 years ago
thats just so hypocritical for the country to be founded on such ideals when we are guilty of a heinous sinful injustice such as enslaving a people. lets keep religion out of this
lovelyx06 3 years ago
No, in all aspects.
It wasn't "hypocritical" to defeat the Democrat Slave States and abolish their slave based rule, which was totally contradictory to the ideals upon which America was founded.
Don't smear all of America with Democrat's rich history of "guilt of a heinous sinful injustice".
As for "keep religion out of this", that's not possible when debunking Democrats who keep dragging religion back in so they can rewrite the historical record of our Christian nation.
TylerNull 3 years ago
There is no clause about "separation of church and state" in the Constitution.
BudMathis 3 years ago
No, but it's a fairly good idea, I'd say.
something7775 3 years ago
Fine - then amend the Constitution to incorporate that idea. Dont let nine dorks in robes say up is down and override plain language
BudMathis 3 years ago
But it does say freedom of religion, so if you want freedom of religion, you cant have religious laws (like a ban on gay marriage)
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
You really have no idea what the Constitution says. Look up the exact language instead of trying to fake it on a public forum.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" -- 1st Amnd
Last I heard, homosexuality is not a religion. Personally, I dont care if gay people marry. I am just trying to encourage you to form beter arguments, rather than to swallow the typical leftist nonsense
BudMathis 3 years ago
"...cant have religious laws (like a ban on gay marriage)"
Human anatomy isn't religion. Unlike Liberal mystics who proselytize a "rainbow of genders", civilized man knows there are only two sexes, male & female. (Have your mommy explain the rest.)
Then again, if Democrats had the capacity to discriminate religion from politics or science, then they wouldn't be Democrats.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Why do you think most people want gay marriage to be banned? Because they think no more people will be born? No, its because the old-testament says a man shall not lie with another man. Other than that statement the rest of what you siad makes little sense
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
Upon what do you base your claimed clairvoyance of everyone's reasoning on the topic, and what would lead you to conclude that a nation of citizens hold but a single reason for anything?
Your claims are as baseless as your conclusions are nonsensical.
Regardless of anyone's reasoning for voting as they do, the fact remains that America has spoken over and over and over again on the matter, and America decisively and overwhelmingly rejects the cultural perversity of "gay marriage". Get over it.
TylerNull 3 years ago
I believe I said most, I never said everyone thinks one thing. America once spoke overwhelmingly for slavery not to be abolished, so we should have stopped fighting for that? It's not the same thing, but all gays want is to be able to be with the person they love, and they're not going to stop fighting for that.
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
No, America NEVER "once spoke overwhelmingly for slavery ...". The DEMOCRAT Slave States did, claiming it as one of their "rights", to America's horror.
Today, Democrats continue to proudly enforce their "affirmative" racism against a rainbow of races, religions, and whatever else suits their whimsy.
Democrats have a rich history of enforcing their depravities by government force, and under ridiculous claims of "rights".
Back to your claim, whether all or most, upon what do you base that?
TylerNull 3 years ago
Before there were democrats and republicans, most americans were for slavery(in the late 1700's until mid 1800's). Also you cant compare the parties of the 1800s to the parties of today, theyre completely different.
Upon what do I base that? By talking to a bunch of people, and also because there's no rational argument against gay marriage besides religion.
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
"most americans were for slavery"
Contrary to Democrat mythology, endlessly reciting your lies fail to make them any less so. America won; Democrats lost.
"...you cant compare..."
I just did. From which the rich history and continued trend of Democrat treachery against America is clear. Again, your response to my observations is reliably void of logic, reason, common sense, and lessons of history.
Attempting to forbid my comparison, and by decree, as you just did, is just plain silly.
TylerNull 3 years ago
So you think the democratic and republican parties are exactly the same as they were 200 years ago?
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
you are incorrect in this statement. America did speak overwhelmingly for slavery, which includes many Northern States. That is one of the reasons Lincoln was hated so much in his time, because of work to end slavery. The war was based primarily on restoring the Union, not slavery. Slavery was a back issue. Many people are missunderstood when they discuss the civil war and the civil war era.
amost3 3 years ago
"America did speak overwhelmingly for slavery" -- so much so that we freed them?
"one of the reasons Lincoln was hated so much in his time" -- so much so that he was elected President? Do you know whose "name was Mudd"?
Yet again, we witness NO tether between Democrat mythology and reality.
TylerNull 3 years ago
I think you're showing ignorance here. Most were not deists, and a deist believes that there is a God. It's interesting to see people use that word suggesting it is a bad thing. Secondly "separation of church and state" isn't in the Constitution. It was found in a letter from Jefferson. The context was that Jefferson didn't want the gov't meddling in church business. Now you and a lot of other misinformed people have it 180 degrees out of phase, trying to redefine it.
CiscoWes 3 years ago
But Jefferson wanted that phrase to create a seperation between church and state that's what it said in his letter, which means the text in the constitution was intended to creat a seperation from church and state
hebrewhammershabbat 3 years ago
Expert Frank Luntz HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHHAHAAHAHHA
awdawdawdwaawdaw 3 years ago
Ann really has a way to get across a point
OOhU2A 3 years ago
Why is she still on tv for crying out loud?
jeanselina 3 years ago
dat?
IMCanis 3 years ago 2
I just can't believe how american people can support a stupid bitch like dat...
steelvag 3 years ago
go Ann! someone needs to say the things you say, keep it up!
boganlewis 3 years ago 3
The only person I hate more than Sean Hannity is Ann Coulter.
rueisl8423 3 years ago
democracy came from greece not christianity the entire world prays America can cure itself Fuck republicans
bikinikill17 3 years ago
Christians adopted it. Unlike, say, Atheists & Muslims.
TylerNull 3 years ago
ann---> "you want them talking about pot, but not about church"
well yeah. the difference is that one is actually good (pot) the other isn't (religion, church)
QueenIsLove39 3 years ago
Obama's socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the "champions" of "Chicago's democratic left" and a long-time socialist activist.
bluecamaro98 3 years ago
Well guess what, Anne? Democrats are now Republicans - yep - no difference b/t the two anymore - they both cheat, steal and maim, look at our poster boy from MA -TED "THE MURDERER" KENNEDY. Brain tumor - no problem - I'll die right after I put a nigger in the white house.
Obominator 3 years ago
America was founded on Judeo-Christian ideals. The reason America's founding fathers were so revolutionary was that they implemented the Christian belief that all people are equal and should only answer to God thus creating a democracy. Every form of government comes from a governing philosophy. Many of which come from religions. Democracy comes from a very basic Christian philosophy. Admitting this does not mean an endorsement of theocracy. Its just respect for what America was founded on.
watsons08 3 years ago
she is inteligent and beautiful.
GALEONESPA1492 3 years ago
Well made video.
TEAMWHITTINGTON
TEAMWHITTINGTON 3 years ago 2
I hope republicans and coulter all die soon
v12kid 3 years ago
Yes and while were at it why dont we strap on the suicide bombs and burn churches and HEY! while we are at THAT!, we could elect a communist. Maybe a man of steel? I hear that worked wonders over in eastern europe! Naww, lets just go with throwing them all in to concentration camps and get them to work on new ways to kill babys and weave rainbow colored flags! oh boy that sure gets me optimistic about our country. (sarcasm)<-- Had to make sure that was in a language liberals could understand.
tjmaaccc 3 years ago
haha. intelligent. if you cant beat em join em! :)
kinghws 3 years ago
I hope people on youtube start having something intelligent to say...unlike you v12kid
realtruthtoday 3 years ago 2
Have you read the Constitution? The Bill of Rights? Notably the 1st Amendment? Mentioning God does NOT mean that we are a Christian nation. Sorry. Washington was entitled to his beliefs as a man and a President. Freedom from religion is a foundation for our great nation. And we all have our mythologies don't we?
zgs12212012 3 years ago
This country was not founded on Christian ideals. No kidding. Really. Read the documents that form the basis of our government. Read some of the letters of our founding fathers. A Creator gives us freedom to be free from religion as well as freedom of religion.
zgs12212012 3 years ago
Leftist mythology debunked:
"... Nature's GOD entitle them ... endowed by their CREATOR with certain unalienable Rights,..."
-- Declaration of Independence
"It is impossible to rightly govern the world without GOD and Bible."
-- George Washington
"Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of GOD and nature."
-- Benjamin Franklin
"...look to the American people and to that GOD who has never forsaken them."
-- Abraham Lincoln
TylerNull 3 years ago
new issue tylernull: do you think the Iraq war is justified? i mentioned this in my earlier posts, but just to focus on that for a few posts.
rb99fosho 3 years ago
Given Muslim's 1,400+ yr war against all people of all religions, now spreading to all continents, the liberal use of hydrogen bombs throughout West Asia and North Africa is certainly "justified".
The US government spending our blood and treasure trying to build Iraq into a civilized nation is just a waste of resources. I'm all for pulling out and using hydrogen bombs. You?
TylerNull 3 years ago
I was just reading your comments. I havn't read them all, but what i have read right now... you are 100% correct on every single point.
Islam is an inherently wicked religion. In modern islam, women are considered as less than lifestock. The Koran teaches this. Mohammed was a child molestor. "Modern islam" is an oxymoron, because Islam is stuck in the Dark Ages. Only in Islam would a 6 year old be "married" to a 30 year old. At least in Hinduism, they marry the 6 year old to another 6 year old.
nate556 3 years ago 2
I do. Next question fuckface.
Minionuup 3 years ago
continued.... it is sad that you are consumed with hatred and yet you fail to recognise how contradictory this is to the Christian ideal. You have brought Christianity into politics and lowered to a disgusting level, knowing obviously very little of scripture, which is supposedly the sole basis of Republican evangelical study. I hope you realise your hatred relects nothing of the Christian message and your misguided nature somehow leads you to realization of yor own "depraved" ignorance.
rb99fosho 3 years ago
"You have brought Christianity into politics"
I haven't mentioned Christianity except to the extent necessary to expose your gibberish whenever you lean on it. A review of our posts shows it is you who leans on your bizarre interpretations of Christianity to prop up your pro-Islamist rhetoric. You're projecting.
TylerNull 3 years ago
tylernull, this is my last post. I respect your opinion, even though I think you are wrong. I believe you are ignorant as you refuse to look from any side but your own. you think i am ignorant for doing so. I do resepct human life, in how i conduct myself and my arguments. some day i hope you visit another country and realise America is not the only country in the world, whether they are the most powerful or not. westo-centrism has consumed you to a "depraved" degree. depravity is your undoing.
rb99fosho 3 years ago
That's the no-I'm-not-but-you-are defense.
Try REASON. You have yet to explain how you can respect life without valueing it enough to fight for it. You have attempted to circumvent the issue by declaring the global war against humanity, by Islam, as the fault of its victims. It isn't.
TylerNull 3 years ago
furthermore tylernull, on the iarq civilian point. read my comment, i did not say anything about "attacking civilians" you obviously did not read my comment!
rb99fosho 3 years ago
Yes, you did. Further, your statements consistently paint a picture of your Islamist darlings as the innocent victims, and Western civilization as the aggressor. You also suggest that defending mankind from the fascist plague of Islam is immoral. You also imply there is no global facsist plague, but rather a few "elite". Everything you post is a lie; everything you post is entirely aligned with the Islamist fascists; everything you post is depraved, and a betrayal of humanity.
TylerNull 3 years ago
yes the more often you say "depraved" the more you convince me of your view! i am not implying "surrender". you have failed to look at the reasons why an elite group of Muslims hate western society, whilst at the same time alienating the rest of Islamic society. you should study the theology of Islam, then you would understand their religion and not discourse in such an ignorant manner. i agree, there is most definitely a problem, but the Iraq warhas done nothing to help this.!
rb99fosho 3 years ago
The more you recite Islamist propaganda, the more I am convinced you are a dhimmified socialist or an Islamist. Civilized man didn't fret over why Nazis hated us and we don't need to fret over that of the current fascist plague of Islam. We can fight back or surrender to it. Fascists remove your fantasies of an alternative.
I simply reject the idea that you are as ignorant of the world around you as your posts would have me believe.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Furthermore, the defense of western civilization and "the most innocent of human life are congruent". please do not tell me your are somehow here equating the two? how does defense of western civilization concur with defending abortion. It is the defense of LIFE, not "our" life or "their" lives, but LIFE in its entirety as created by God himself.
rb99fosho 3 years ago
Defending the human fetus is the OPPOSITE of "defending abortion".
Claiming to defend human life whilst deriding those who protect it, as you've been doing here for days now, is fatuous. Life is being taken even as you call for submitting to more of the same. Passively submitting to the global fascist plague of Islam doesn't protect human life; anyone's, including those of Muslims. Islamists are warring on all of mankind. Your implied suggestion that we surrender to them is depraved.
TylerNull 3 years ago
just to correct myself tyler, in my previous comment about abortion, i meant to say "western civilization concur with the most innocent of human life"-apologies. i did not mean concurrent with defending abortion, just to correct myself on that point as in your preious comment you discussed defense of the most innocent of humankind etc.
rb99fosho 3 years ago
so what about the people of iraq who are defending their families against american troops who have invaded a sovereign nation? are the civilians not innocent? and yet we hear so much about the "murder" of american soldiers. my goodness, again, ignorance at its very best! you need to remove yourself from this "them" and "us" nonsense before it ties you in a knot of hatred and I am not against the american troops who believe they are there for good reasons,they have been misled by the government)!
rb99fosho 3 years ago
"what about the people of iraq who ..." -- the people of Iraq are the ones fighting on our side of this war, unlike Western Leftists & their Islamist buddies. You recite enemy propaganda about our side "attacking civilians", though you know that's but a nest of lies. Your rhetoric and that of Islamists is indistinguishable. By your prattle, the US also "invaded" France during WWII; another "sovereign nation". Your pro-Islamist rhetoric is just a nonsensical betrayal of humanity, at best.
TylerNull 3 years ago
are you serious? I am not even american and yet I am leftist? hilarious. i am not pro-Islamist, I am pro life. again, you know nothing of Islamist religion, and also , by the "rhetoric of your" prattle, nothing of the Christian message either. go study the theology and then come back and argue. IGNORANCE!
rb99fosho 3 years ago
"not even american and yet I am leftist" -- they aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, American Leftists learned their socialist ways from socialist Europe.
You neither value life nor save it by deriding those who fight for your right to belittle and slander them as they do so. There is nothing moral, or of the Chrisitan ideal, about your politics, especially those of your fantastical notions regarding mankind's struggle against Islamic fascism.
TylerNull 3 years ago
i cannot fathom how people support the majority of ann coulters views. how can she be so anti-abortion, and yet support the war, despite her apparent pro life status. war kills many many people! its just hypocritical nonsense! the iraq war is a disaster. i am religious by the way before anyone starts talkin nonsense to me about being a liberal immoral so and so. at least im consistent in my views!
rb99fosho 3 years ago
The defense of the most innocent of human life and the defense of Western Civilization are congruent.
You are obviously in favor of abortion, so you too are willing to kill. The only difference is your preference is to kill the most innocent of human life, and to passively watch the victims of Muslim savagery as they are slaughtered.
Thus, your "religion" (Liberalism) is certainly rife with hypocrisy, but more notable is its abject depravity.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Eh, No actually, I am not pro-abortion. I am vehemently opposed to abortion and to war, as they are bother murdering human life!! how do you reconcile the two? i respect ALL human life, and my point is the hypocrisy of republicans who support this disastrous war and yet are so opposed to abortion. again, at least i am consistent with my views. i suppose i am still a liberal according to you? jesus replaced the 10 commandments with 2: love your god and love your neighbour. from a roman catholic.
rb99fosho 3 years ago
"how do you reconcile the two?" -- I just explained the congruence of the two, but I'll offer another perspective.
You claim to respect human life, but don't value it enough to defend it against those warring on us. Defending innocent life isn't "murder", even if that includes killing people. There's a difference. Your inability to discriminate between the two isn't evidence of a hypocrisy in those less unfortunate. The only consistency in your views is moral equivocation, which is depraved.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Ann Coulter is the best.
Liberals wants America to be a place for licentious promiscuous immoral failures.
Who inhale thc all day and don't do anything except eat sleep and procreate.
Mizuhry 3 years ago
fuck ann coulter
Mennismervice 3 years ago
Ann rocks go suck dick stupid immoral Faggot
volodenon 3 years ago
she does not, look up the rage against the machine episode and that was completely a lie.
"faggot"? whats with this against gays.
and i'm not a democrat, I just don't like liars or anti-feminists.
Mennismervice 3 years ago
Actually THAT was a f*cking great joke! High Court hahahahahaha!!! Not bad (1.05 in link) Please don't make me break with Liberal tradition and watch Faux ;-)
WanderingSplit 3 years ago
The Liberal tradition IS faux;-)
TylerNull 3 years ago
Hey! You hurt my feelings :-(
WanderingSplit 3 years ago 2
God I feel horrible right now to be an American... The whole god in our country thing is bullshit. It's just completely rediculous
Codjr 3 years ago
i like ann coulter. she is not afraid to speak her mind, smart, and backs herself up.
i idlize her.
schatzi321 3 years ago
Ms. Coulter sometimes seems harsh [ her comments about 9/11 widows gave me pause, but I soon forgave her as I know she is of Christ]but I know we would all be safer, here in America, if our president Bush did actually bomb the Middle East and encourage the survivors to accept Our Lord and Savior. Thank you.
molloyx 3 years ago
I really hope you're kidding. That people could think that the US President should spread Christianity by bombing people??
And surely you don't believe she is of Christ. Read some things that Christ said and then read some things that Coulter says, and you will be hard pressed to find any relation between them except that she claims to follow him while she completely contradicts his teachings.
Kaiservonarctic 3 years ago
liberal
psetto93 3 years ago
Republicans and their big talk of having a small govt that doesn interfere in peoples lives.
then they ban abortion, gay marriage, the right to Habeas Corpus, private phone tapping, invading someone else's country for fun, creating the Patriot Act, stealing an election, torturing prisoners, keeping prisoners from going through the judicial system, blocking funds for scientific research, and scaring the shit out of its own citizens so theyd have a free pass for going to war.
Talk about big gov
mttorresca 3 years ago
Democrats & their lies ...
"ban abortion" -- and premedited murder, kidnapping, rape, too.
"gay marriage" -- homosexuals have, can, and do marry, under the SAME RULES as everyone else. However, they don't have a "right" to use a driver's license to drive on the opposite side of the road, either.
"torture" -- in accordance with the Geneva Convention for those who fight like Muslim savages.
"blocking funds" -- NOT taking money FROM medical COMPANIES to squander on gov't stupidity.
TylerNull 3 years ago
The right cares so much about embryos that they completely disregard how the woman feels about it. Shouldn the "day after pill" be banned too? or does God only inject the soul a week later?
Gays who don live in California & Massachusetts, don have the same rights as others married people, and in 41 states gay marriage or anything like it is strictly forbbiden.
Article 13 Geneva Convention "Prisoners of war must at all times be humanely treated."
mttorresca 3 years ago
"embryos" -- thanks to Roe v. Wade, it is now illegal for Americans to vote on such matters. Liberals LOVE liberty only if it doesn't afftect their holy sacrament -- torturing the human fetus to death. Liberals have infinite compassion for the perp'; requiring them to be merciless toward its victims.
"Gays" -- SAME rights. SAME rules. I just explained that.
Article 13 -- No. The contract grants protections in exchange for rules of warfare; Islamist warfare is a violation of those rules.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Art17"No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war"
Nevertheless you still avoided the main issue, the exchange of our freedom for the so called "security"
Thomas J. said "freedom above all". The govt #1 job is to keep us free, and Bush little by little is takin that away from us. We're not safer in Iraq, we're not safer avoiding dialogue with nations
Please friend, help us avoid a 3rd Bush term
Its our human right to b free, not a privilege
mttorresca 3 years ago
The Islamist enemy is in breech of any and all such contracts, assuming we have a contract with them, which we don't.
If you can grasp the most basic concept(s) of a contract, then you can see that inane tidbits plucked from an irrelevant one is nonsensical.
Your claim that I "still avoided the main issue" is rather silly since your scattered rants scurry across many topics, as is expected of Leftists as they try to avoid reality.
TylerNull 3 years ago
This "reality" you talk about, is it the reality that OReilly, Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Cheney, BUsh, the reality they preach?
or
The reality that neither Bin Laden nor WMDs exist in Iraq? The reality Al Qaeda is stronger now than its ever been?
The reality that from an average surplus in 2000, Bush put us in a debt of $9tri? The reality that Global warming is deteriorating our planet and Bush does next to nothing about it?
I live this reality too,however, I with many, intend to change it
mttorresca 3 years ago
I exposed the fallacies of your first three topics and you respond by launching a new flurry over an even broader range of topics.
Regarding just some of your latest fallacies on WMD and murderous Muslim sects at war with all of humanity, hundreds of chemical rounds have been found in Iraq since the war began, and al-Queda operatives were in Iraq before, during and afterwards. We have killed much of their leadership (20,000). Most importantly, they are THERE and not here since 2001.
TylerNull 3 years ago
Im sorry, so many things have gone wrong since Bush took office, it makes it hard to focus on a single issue, but Ill try. Prior 9/11, Bush received 5 different intelligence reports claimin there were 19 terrorists in America plotting a major attack involvin aircraft.Bush didn bother. After 9/11 he misleads us into Iraq.
Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda. Bushs foreign policy has only aggravated muslims everywhere. We had Global support against Osama, but Bush blew it by invading Iraq
mttorresca 3 years ago
everything that happened is because of clinton. bush got in office and had to try to fix everythnig clinton wrecked. it takes 4 years for a president to wreck the country & for us to be effected by it. in bush's 3rd year things got crappy. clinton wrecked us. the clintons opened all trade with china! enough said
psetto93 3 years ago
Saddam was a secularist. He did not have al-qaeda in his country he would not have gotten along with Osama. al-qaeda came into Iraq when the US destabilized its governement.
apoctalyptoV 2 years ago
That's exactly what the large majority of americans can NOT understand. Irak has nothig to do with 9 11 attacks
CantolaoTV 2 years ago
thank you! finally one person who knows what they are talkign about when it comes into Iraq and al-qaeda!
apoctalyptoV 2 years ago
crap i meant to give you a thumbs up
shootcocacola73 2 years ago
Seriously man, Fox news is funny... anyway, the First Amendment clearly says that Religion must be separated from Gov't.
mttorresca 3 years ago
man....these people r so silly...who the fuck doesnt do drugs..at the end of the day the true reality is that obama is black and these fucking boggpts dont want him as president full fucking stop.
BajanCreation 3 years ago
Whenever anyone points out that Obama's circle of fiends are mostly from the kill-whitey sect of Liberalism, their instinctive idiocy requires them to say he's not black because his mother is white.
Of course, Dhimmi-crats are baseless, so they can aggressively reject logic and reason to claim he IS black.
Proselytize your racist gospel misery to your mommy, you shameless, Leftist scum -- yeah, that's triple redundancy. (You earned it.)
TylerNull 3 years ago
You seem to be filled with to much hate and too little wisdom. You probably feel it. Maybe you should spend less time reading your thesaurus, and more time researching humanity, not color.
dinslo 3 years ago
Unable to go 7 seconds without raising the topic of their candidate's skin color, Democrats are left complaining about the manner in which we notice they do so.
With stunning speed, Obama & his circle of race hustling scum have reduced his own party to warring, tribal factions, each making threats & accusations at the other. Of course, they pause every now & then to accuse observers of being hateful, racist or stupid -- so they don't lose practice.
Liberalism is a crime against humanity.
TylerNull 3 years ago
According to America's precious founding document, Ann Coulter is a subhuman, along with all other women and non-whites.
themasterbakerrr 3 years ago
I just love her interruptions.
shuckslbj 3 years ago
the polar bear is on the endangered species list ... they have been seen eating each other ... a shortage of food and ice ... and summer has just started ... so this bear swam 200 miles to iceland ... it was the first bear in over 15 years to do so ... but it was making land fall in a populated area and ran into a hail of gun fire when it reached iceland ... the whole incident was captured on video ... so if you know any polar bears ... tell them to walk a fine line if they are starving
AgnesBojaxhiu2000 3 years ago
We heard this same sort of gibberish whilst the Left were attempting to stop the Alaskan Pipeline.
Bears swim. Polar bears swim between continents. Carnivorous animals sometimes eat their young, though never to the extent that Liberals engage in the activity.
Beyond that, what was your point?
TylerNull 3 years ago
gm is closing down truck and suv plants ... the rushie neocons told you those were the best ... al gore was right ... the prius is the best ... clinton is quitting the race ... the rushies have been wrong, wrong soooo many times ... like when they committed treason during a war and turned in undercover cia operative valorie plame ... and look at what they are doing in the senate to kill the climate change bill .... it is part of their war on the law and on science ... they are wrong, wrong
AgnesBojaxhiu2000 3 years ago
GM can't compete because they have to pay more union workers who do NOT work anymore than do union workers who still work. Price fixing cartels are deadly.
What "the rushie neocons" told America is that your choice of cars shouldn't be dictated to you by the gov't, or Pope Albert Arnold "Celcius" Gore, Jr. and his carbon credits corporation that makes millions of dollars from his fascist scheme, where he prophesizes the weather 100,000+ hours from now.
Liberal fascism isn't science.
TylerNull 3 years ago
I'm a republican, but I don't approve of republicans bringing religion into politics. It doesn't belong there, the constitution states that church and state should be separated. Let me use abortion as an example, I'm against it not because the church says it's wrong but by the fact that life is being taken away from a child. I believe in human rights, everybody's created equal, everybody deserves the same opportunities.
golbyaka 3 years ago
As we witness with Obama's circle of fiends from Trinity Divided, Democrats have no capacity to separate church and state. In fact, you can see Obama proselytizing to his flock in one of my videos:
"Obama's Hijack Attack".
Following those observations, we see that Liberalism is the theology that powers the Democrat(ic) Party. Theirs is federally enforced, from Protected (and unprotected) Class Law, to forcing US citizens to pay for their aggressive importation of illegal aliens.
TylerNull 3 years ago
tyler- great ann coulter video..
i like to say: truth to a liberal is like salt to a garden slug..
it's funny when a liberal says america was founded and is based on liberal ideas..
az101010 3 years ago
Thanks.
Whenever Liberals recite that claim, I point out that modern Liberalism is the polar opposite of classical Liberalism. Contrasting the two is always fun, too.
Jonah Goldberg's book, "Liberal Fascism", dicusses the history thereof. I have a playlist, by that title, of a talk he gave on his book. He includes some interesting, lesser known, historical details, too.
TylerNull 3 years ago
the dems cant even figure out who they want to run LOL what a big group of soft jerks
Conservativesaregood 3 years ago
Colmes does not belong on there. He is not intelligent enough.
realtruthtoday 3 years ago 2
shit coming from a girl who cover her body with her own hair
SocialDRcks 3 years ago
Since when does having the words "by our Creator" imply that the Founding Fathers intending for us to be ruled by a minority of fanatical and intolerant Evangelical Christians?
nw1982 3 years ago
You are the one who is fanatical!
realtruthtoday 3 years ago
Ohhh yes, you're sooooo right. I'm an easygoing Episcopalian moderate who respects the rights of others. That just SCREAMS fanatic!!! Besides, your little comment has all the argumentative weight of "I am rubber and you are glue..."
nw1982 3 years ago
You are a Whiskeypalian.
realtruthtoday 3 years ago
And Unfortuanately OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT OF GOVERNMENT IS GAY< which one of the founding fathers would have known that this would happen? WE LIVE IN THIS GAY REGIME< where things are flipped upside down, and inside out.
BurnAllLiberals 3 years ago
There is your BROAD meaning of a Faggot. Faggot or Gay or homosexualty in this case also applies to emotions, appearnaces, behavior, and especially Ideologies. Yes there are GAY MORALS GAY THOGUHTS AND GAY IDEOLOGIES!!!
BurnAllLiberals 3 years ago
So being a Christian, being a good citizen, paying taxes, loving family, standing up for national defense, personally opposing abortion...all these are gay thoughts and morals? Because I'm gay and I believe in them.
nw1982 3 years ago
Obviously you are lost and confused, GET YOUR MORALS STRAIGHT!!! If you want to pick and point reasons to throw judgement at me, I have no time to waste, otherwise if you want to know how you are lost, READ MORE, ask me for Referrals!
BurnAllLiberals 3 years ago
Obama is a fag. And All Democrats. Since the liberals like to use broad meanings of words(or terms,definitions,etc.) Here are examples of a BROAD Meaning of Faggot: A Man that can not be the head of his own family, a man who obeys his wife, a mand who shares his manhood with his wife or girlfriend, etc.,etc.,etc.,
BurnAllLiberals 3 years ago
I would vote for Ann Coulter for president because she looks better then hillary
fsoclan 3 years ago
AMEN! XD
crzyaznchick812 3 years ago
Ann Coulter called Obama a fag!
brklynmatt 3 years ago
So? Fag means idiot nowadays, it's the universal internet insult!
greyfox37 3 years ago
OK, greyfox, then you're a fag.
VincentTruman 3 years ago 3
Why does anything from Fox News receive any, much less the lions share of, attention?
AdamGCox 3 years ago 2
The Neo-Cons who are taking over the Republican Party detest capitalism. They want it to destroy itself and actively pursue policies to that effect.
gpromeo54 3 years ago
Ron Paul'ers wouldn't know capitalists if they fought a war to defend Paul'ers from those who would exterminate them.
TylerNull 3 years ago
6. For those who vote based on FACTS rather than RHETORIC, Barack Hussein Obama's voting record is LEFT of Bernie Sanders the Vermont Senator who describes himself as a SOCIALIST!
For those supporters who think that Obama is going to make change, they are EXACTLY right he will make CHANGE but it will most assuredly be for the WORSE!
These idiots that FOLLOW AIMLESSLY behind there new DEMIGOD say he will work with ALL to promote change.
His voting record Proves that is a LIE!
drvltore 3 years ago
9 / 11 happened because clintion didnt anything to stop islamic terrorrists, then he was too busy with lewinsky, did clinton anything against terrorists? leftist pinky liberals are the best friend of islamics
Fravahar 3 years ago
The founders of this country were predominantly Deists who purposefully avoided the use of the word "God."
gpromeo54 3 years ago
"I sincerely esteem it [US Constitution] a system which without the finger of GOD, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests."
-- Alexander Hamilton
"It is impossible to rightly govern the world without GOD and Bible."
-- George Washington
"Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of GOD and nature."
-- Benjamin Franklin
There's a whole lot of "God" amongst our Christian founders.
TylerNull 3 years ago
There isn't in the Constitution. Interesting that you don't cite that document. And Deists believed in God, as do most Secularists.
gpromeo54 3 years ago
You made an invalid claim, and those quotes show just how false it is -- yours is mythology. The founders obviously did NOT avoid "the use of the word 'God'"
"There isn't in the Constitution." -- so what? What's your point?
Regardless of what Deists and Secularists do or do not believe, most all of our nations founders were Christians. The Left's latest marketing campaign, while a popular fad, is simply a lie.
TylerNull 3 years ago
I wonder why the right in our country spend so much time fighting theocracies while trying to install one in the USA. If the Fundamentalists hate America so much, why don't they leave? Ron Paul is right. You have lost complete and utter respect fo the US Constitution. So what? What's the point? It is our FOUNDING DOCUMENT.
By the way, God Bless John McCain. Should he become President, watch him devout his attention and administration to politics as opposed to the second coming of Christ.
gpromeo54 3 years ago
You began by posting a myth, which I debunked, and you've since made increasingly bizarre claims. Your latest being a slander of some ill-defined category of Americans, apparently for their "crime" of being a US citizen whilst Christian.
And all, now evident, for the purpose of deriding any and all who favor victory over the global Islamist plague.
Paul'ers are just nascent leftists in training -- entirely aligned with the enemy, as is required of their ilk.
TylerNull 3 years ago
That our country was founded on secular principles and that our founding fathers - most famous Jefferson - were Deists is hardly a myth. The fact that you ignore the Constitution in your citations and marginalize it is glaring. I will not argue to prove facts on a youtube comment board. Renew your library card or go back to highschool.
I am a Christian. But I am also an American. They are hardly mutually exclusive. As are Secularist and Religious.
gpromeo54 3 years ago
Again, you muddle topics.
Our founders -- all but two -- were self professed Christians, including Jefferson. I already debunked your bit of mythology in that regard.
That the constitution forbids a state enforced religion doesn't change that. Nor does it change the fact that the founding ideal of our nation, including the US Constitution, is the Christian belief that the right to liberty is a gift from God, not from other men (government).
TylerNull 3 years ago
Again, Deists were Christians. And Deists were Secularists. They aren't mutually exclusive.
I believe it says "Our Creator." They were very specific in that document to AVOID the use of the word God for that very reason: their secularism. If they had said God, they would have meant God. Aren't you supposed to be the strict constructionalist type?
gpromeo54 3 years ago