Compared to the other pieces in the Moments Musicaux, the Andantino is performed the least, probably because it's the most deceptively difficult one in the set. This performance is excellent. Lugansky brings out the descending and ascending chromatic lines very clearly. Another version worth listening to is Vladimir Ashkenazy's. Toward the end, the main melody is hidden within the filigree of the right hand. Ashkenazy brings it out amazingly well while Lugansky does not. So difficult to achieve!
Perhaps that's a show of his- Lugansky's- geius; the music is simply unadulteraded Rachmaninov with no performer ego/show off-factor involved, so no-one even thinks about the actual performer, simply the music.
The combination of Lugansky and Rachmaninov is terrific, and if I were religious, I would think that they were both blessed by God.
That should be effusive enough to make up for the previous silence!
Hi Alon nice to hear from you. Yes Ashkanasy is brilliant as is Berman, Volodos, Gilels and Horozitz all is the same bucket for my opinion. Lugansky whilst the youngest achieves and amazing level of interpretation and musicality with EVERY note so clearly defines and no overly heavy dramaticsand use of the pedal to accentuate. Nicolai reigns supreme in my view. In fact its all personal preference at this level dont you think. ?
I would have to agree with you that he has mastered a tremendous amount at his age. For my taste I think Ashkenazy ranks supreme, but we all have our opinions. Lugansky is still an amazing pianist.
agree. so do Richter and Volodos, though I prefer Richter and Ashkenazy because they do not emphasise the musical fireworks of rachmaninoff too much, which is something Volodos tends to do. it would be interesting to have a recording of Volodos playing all the preludes. I do like his moment musical no.2 very, very much. The moment musicaux are excellent for a pianist like Volodos, the preludes excellent for Richter and Ashkenazy (both of them recorded them), but that, of course, is my opinion ;)
@AlonPianist I know Vladimir Ashkenazy's grandson. He's an incredible guitarist, just as his grand father is one of my favourite pianists out there :) Lucky to have him in my band!
@AlonPianist Agree whole heartedly. So many are fixated on Horowitz, and Gilels as if they were the only pianists ever. Listen to Ashkanazy Prelude 23-2....just awesome.
@tjtheplay Yeah maybe but we had some fun :) At the end of the day between these great artists is a very fine line dont you think ? I mean for Rachmaninoff I often have a favourite artist for the piece, For eg, Prelude 23-2 I love Ashkanay, he owns this one, however 23-5 I feel Ashkanazy rushes it. Listen to Lugansky play Chpoin Nocturn 27-2.
Now ther Cadneza in the Rach-3 is Bermans IMHO. No one projects the power and dynamics Berman achieves. The common denominator is we all love music.
@MrLeofabian See my comment from 2 years ago, Horowitz is doubtless an amazing pianaist but at this level its personal choice and with the pianisy and what composer they play. For Rachmaninoff Vladimir Ashkanazy, Berman and Lugansky have a preferred style and Gilels is no slouch either. I just have an issue with those that get hung up totally on Horozitz as the "only" pianist.
@busylifemeto You got Gilels right and don't forget Rachmaninov himself and Horowitz. Ashkenazy's is good, I have CDs of him that I play all the time. Sorry, Berman and Lugansky are maybe in the junior varsity and keep trying, maybe they'll get there.
@sammarco02 Sorry my friend, have to disagree with you as do many critics. Yes I love Ashkanazy, he is here in Sydney my home town. No doubt that Horozitz was great BUT not GOD. Rachmaninoff was one of the most amazing composers of all time but it does not follow he followed as well as a Pianist. Its very much down to personal preference when Pianists are in this league. How much have you listened to of Berman, one of the greats
@MrLeofabian I agreee entirely, in some cases I prefer Ashkanazy, like his Prelude 23-2 just outstanding. Richter may be slightly better technically in some areas BUT Ashkanazy reigns supreme on this piece.
The part at 6:42 destorys me with its beauty!
ann03071874 1 month ago
Sublime!!! Rachmaninov live again!.
darioeuphonium 9 months ago
Fantastically beautiful...
chobeethaninov 9 months ago
WOW, i dont even want to say i played this piece. Nikolai just killed it. wonderful interpretation
junghohwang89 9 months ago
Merci! You are the best, your music and your heart.
MsJmcf 10 months ago
Compared to the other pieces in the Moments Musicaux, the Andantino is performed the least, probably because it's the most deceptively difficult one in the set. This performance is excellent. Lugansky brings out the descending and ascending chromatic lines very clearly. Another version worth listening to is Vladimir Ashkenazy's. Toward the end, the main melody is hidden within the filigree of the right hand. Ashkenazy brings it out amazingly well while Lugansky does not. So difficult to achieve!
888ChristinaS 11 months ago
beautiful
richclayderman 1 year ago
I love you Nikolai!
Shaghayegh11 1 year ago
Beautiful interpretation. I'm going to see him perform Rach 3 in a couple days :-)
NicolaiRM 2 years ago
Amazingly well played! I shall check him out further and real soon. TY my friend James.
paulostroff99 2 years ago 3
paul, this is my 1st time lesitening to this pianist, so wonderful, and romantic, many thanks for your share. TY
Mozart99900 2 years ago 3
Beautifully performed! A gem! TY!
CanadaPisces 2 years ago 3
One of my favourite pianists of all time.
Ramondreisen 2 years ago 2
Rachmaninoff was a pure genius to be able to come up with such awe-inspiring melodies...
mymovies133 2 years ago 9
Very lyrical beautiful and special...
FranzofL 2 years ago 2
Gorbachev was here.
sushlet 3 years ago
Светлая грусть.
ogre6666 3 years ago 4
Probably one of the greatest pianists alive and no comments ?
busylifemeto 3 years ago 20
yes man, you're right
capetond 3 years ago 5
Perhaps that's a show of his- Lugansky's- geius; the music is simply unadulteraded Rachmaninov with no performer ego/show off-factor involved, so no-one even thinks about the actual performer, simply the music.
The combination of Lugansky and Rachmaninov is terrific, and if I were religious, I would think that they were both blessed by God.
That should be effusive enough to make up for the previous silence!
etude12 2 years ago
If you wanna hear another amazing pianist that plays Rachmaninoff extremely well, listen to Vladimir Ashkenazy.
AlonPianist 2 years ago 15
Hi Alon nice to hear from you. Yes Ashkanasy is brilliant as is Berman, Volodos, Gilels and Horozitz all is the same bucket for my opinion. Lugansky whilst the youngest achieves and amazing level of interpretation and musicality with EVERY note so clearly defines and no overly heavy dramaticsand use of the pedal to accentuate. Nicolai reigns supreme in my view. In fact its all personal preference at this level dont you think. ?
Just my humble view.
busylifemeto 2 years ago
I would have to agree with you that he has mastered a tremendous amount at his age. For my taste I think Ashkenazy ranks supreme, but we all have our opinions. Lugansky is still an amazing pianist.
AlonPianist 2 years ago 4
I am with you!
Galiah13 2 years ago
agree. so do Richter and Volodos, though I prefer Richter and Ashkenazy because they do not emphasise the musical fireworks of rachmaninoff too much, which is something Volodos tends to do. it would be interesting to have a recording of Volodos playing all the preludes. I do like his moment musical no.2 very, very much. The moment musicaux are excellent for a pianist like Volodos, the preludes excellent for Richter and Ashkenazy (both of them recorded them), but that, of course, is my opinion ;)
DonFrankos 2 years ago
Ah yes! He's one of my favorites playing Rachmaninov, other than Rachmaninov himself.
tightKnit 2 years ago
@AlonPianist I know Vladimir Ashkenazy's grandson. He's an incredible guitarist, just as his grand father is one of my favourite pianists out there :) Lucky to have him in my band!
Mikkerdreng 1 year ago
@AlonPianist Agree whole heartedly. So many are fixated on Horowitz, and Gilels as if they were the only pianists ever. Listen to Ashkanazy Prelude 23-2....just awesome.
busylifemeto 4 months ago
@busylifemeto Askanazy is such a good interpreter of Rachmaninoff.
But the reason why everyone including me thinks that Horowitz is the best interpreter of Rachmaninoff was because he actually knew him personally.
tjtheplay 1 month ago
@tjtheplay I am best friends with my Golf Pro but I am an individual and a very different STYLE :)
busylifemeto 1 month ago
@busylifemeto Yeah but in golf, you don't try to play like how the gold pro intends to play do you?
I don't think I worded that right, did I?
tjtheplay 1 month ago
@tjtheplay Yeah maybe but we had some fun :) At the end of the day between these great artists is a very fine line dont you think ? I mean for Rachmaninoff I often have a favourite artist for the piece, For eg, Prelude 23-2 I love Ashkanay, he owns this one, however 23-5 I feel Ashkanazy rushes it. Listen to Lugansky play Chpoin Nocturn 27-2.
Now ther Cadneza in the Rach-3 is Bermans IMHO. No one projects the power and dynamics Berman achieves. The common denominator is we all love music.
busylifemeto 1 month ago
@busylifemeto "The common denominator is we all love music"
Yup!
tjtheplay 1 month ago
@busylifemeto you need to hear vladimir horowitz. lugansky ist a great pianist no doubt but .....
MrLeofabian 6 months ago
@MrLeofabian See my comment from 2 years ago, Horowitz is doubtless an amazing pianaist but at this level its personal choice and with the pianisy and what composer they play. For Rachmaninoff Vladimir Ashkanazy, Berman and Lugansky have a preferred style and Gilels is no slouch either. I just have an issue with those that get hung up totally on Horozitz as the "only" pianist.
busylifemeto 6 months ago
@busylifemeto You got Gilels right and don't forget Rachmaninov himself and Horowitz. Ashkenazy's is good, I have CDs of him that I play all the time. Sorry, Berman and Lugansky are maybe in the junior varsity and keep trying, maybe they'll get there.
sammarco02 4 months ago
@sammarco02 Sorry my friend, have to disagree with you as do many critics. Yes I love Ashkanazy, he is here in Sydney my home town. No doubt that Horozitz was great BUT not GOD. Rachmaninoff was one of the most amazing composers of all time but it does not follow he followed as well as a Pianist. Its very much down to personal preference when Pianists are in this league. How much have you listened to of Berman, one of the greats
busylifemeto 4 months ago
@sammarco02 Disagree totally
busylifemeto 1 month ago
@MrLeofabian I agreee entirely, in some cases I prefer Ashkanazy, like his Prelude 23-2 just outstanding. Richter may be slightly better technically in some areas BUT Ashkanazy reigns supreme on this piece.
busylifemeto 1 month ago