Added: 3 months ago
From: kbb
Views: 2,289
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nismofury

    Totally agree! I like Chevy, Jus tired of dem holdn BACK! But I'm still diggn SPARK.

  • Why this and not the trax? 2 door looks better. It'll get around 45 mpg. This car will fail. Super slow not enough mpgs for what it is and chevy is going charge too much for this. They will claim a msrp of $11,999 or something like that but real cost at a dealership will be closer to $15k+. Too little too late. Cars like this micro cars iq, smart, fiat500 etc will not sell. why?...THEY COST TOO MUCH! for what they are they should be under $10k for ppl to even consider it. Low price = sales!

  • headligthts bigger than the wheels...stupid looking.

  • @cb7pwn That's an asshole's remark you made...

  • Is there, or will there be, a power sunroof option with the Spark?

    If not I may have to go aftermarket with it if I decide to purchase this machine.

    The jury's out on that, for now.

    Peace!<AladdinSaneNYC-

  • Headlights are bigger than tires.. looks weird.

  • Tiny, ugly, NO space inside. Imagine being in an accident with a BIG vehicle and being bounced all over a freeway inside this little "thing", not a pretty site,

    not to say really scary!

    The Malibu is a much better choice, if you must buy GM (Government Motors).

  • I absolutely LOVE the exterior styling of this car, I always have. It just looks so.. Fantastic. Kinda edgy for a small car. I know it's not for freeway driving or going fast, but i would like to see this car with a 2.0 turbo option. I've always had a weakness for small cars that go fast :) just way more fun to drive.

  • this have been in sale in south america for a long time now

  • YUK !!!

  • The Dodge K CARS sold millions at only 80 HP and carried up to 6 passengers and boasted 41 HWY MPG

  • Tiny displacement engine + porkyness = high revver = mediocre mpg. No way I'm getting into this rattle box.

  • Now if Chevy only made reliable small cars.

  • 2300lbs, and swap in the chevy cruze 1.4L turbo engine with aftermarket boost. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......

  • Ugly....the Metro was proportioned way better. At least the 89-94 model was. Those headlights are way too big.

  • Only Micah could make me stick around to the very end of a Chevrolet Spark video review.

  • ► Not bad. I'd pick it over the Smart FourTwo and Scion iQ any day at least.

  • You can get nav on a shitty spark but not on a Malibu or Impala? That makes a whole lot of sense...

  • @T966ER Where did you hear you can't get a navi on Malibus or Impalas? You definitely can.

  • @ihategeneralmotors Touchscreen navigation (like the one showed in this Spark or on a Tahoe, Traverse, or Equinox isn't currently available on the Impala or Malibu

  • uh what about the chevy sonic?

  • 85.2 hp?? .2?? haha, whatever floats ur boat, chevy

  • eh...it's ok looking. Why the hell would you get heated seats and nav with this car? kinda defeats the purpose. Oh and 4 -speed Chevy? ...really?

  • @tomtom5418 why not?? i like to get opcionals... they should put the 6-speed of the sonic

  • Looks like the Mazda 2's kid sister.

  • That is the WORST looking car ever.

  • the low end of acceptable... :P

  • nice car for just the city

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more