One of the WTC design engineers, Leslie Robertson, had denied that people saw molten steel in the Ground Zero rubble. A video surfaced recently showing that in 2002 he claimed he had seen "a little river of molten steel" himself.
For clarification if you are just picking up the thread, this comment was a reply to fierospeeder's earlier comments where he claims that melting glass looks like thermite.
You're very wrong. Thermite isn't weak at all. It's the best thing to cut through titanium. I've seen videos with the beams cut at an angle as well and if you look closely you'll notice that the sparks from the beams are falling downward in a sorta dripping motion. Only thermite sparks are known to do that.
No I'm talking about a video while the building was still standing. You could see the sparks like it's dripping from the building. I think if you watch Zeitgeist (the first one) in part 2 where they talk about 9/11 you'll see it.
these are the original columns,it was these that they cut,probably to get rid of the evidence along with all the shipped off steel,what happened to preservation of the crime scene ie the steel.
send me link of the pics of the firemen cutting the columns,because i cannot find them????thats a request to blue shadow 1996.
The picture shown in the video is a picture taken after the columns,not just this one, they weighed about 14 ton and were sticking out of the rubble and had to be cut to remove and rescue the survivors.And they show Ironworkers cutting off theis piece,
yes a torch will not cut like that and that fire men is part of the people helping find people alive so im sure their not cutting beams down that are just going str8 up in the air
If cut by acetylene torch would not look like that - molten material type, quantity and distribution and the angle of cut (including the angle though metal on top and bottom sides) are all NOT consistent with 'man operated' cutting of any kind.
But is consistent with controlled demolition cutting charge.
But we can all have an opinion right?! - even when we are just saying whatever we want regardless of the fact we are not experts and haven't done any research whatsoever!
This has been flagged as spam show
One of the WTC design engineers, Leslie Robertson, had denied that people saw molten steel in the Ground Zero rubble. A video surfaced recently showing that in 2002 he claimed he had seen "a little river of molten steel" himself.
See my video:
The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
23 seconds ago
cowcharge has been blocked for dumbassness. I'm having a low tolerance day.
thetruthrises 1 year ago
Dumbass. Google blacksmith's forge.
Cowcharge 1 year ago
"thats the window glass melting"
How do you get the volume of numerous windows worth of glass to match the volume of the spill all from one window alone? Mirrors?
Glass does not produce sparks like the spill.
In other words, stop making up ridiculous claims, especially with no video to back them up.
Show glass spilling like that, in the same volume and explain what was done to create it.
Explain why this WTC spill is a perfect simulation of thermite runoff.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
For clarification if you are just picking up the thread, this comment was a reply to fierospeeder's earlier comments where he claims that melting glass looks like thermite.
thetruthrises 2 years ago
"thats the window glass melting"
fierospeeder's rabbithole logic.
The volume is that of many window glasses melting.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
That's ridiculous, glass melting??? LOL
trapozoidalsyth 2 years ago
You're very wrong. Thermite isn't weak at all. It's the best thing to cut through titanium. I've seen videos with the beams cut at an angle as well and if you look closely you'll notice that the sparks from the beams are falling downward in a sorta dripping motion. Only thermite sparks are known to do that.
chimaera01 3 years ago
is this the video of the building before or after it collapsed?
I'm refering to the video "after" the collapse. They need to cut up the destruction and oxy acet torches are used to cut up the beams.
fierospeeder 3 years ago
No I'm talking about a video while the building was still standing. You could see the sparks like it's dripping from the building. I think if you watch Zeitgeist (the first one) in part 2 where they talk about 9/11 you'll see it.
chimaera01 3 years ago
and thats the window glass melting. Which has a lower melting point than steel.
If the beams were being cut at that instant, the building would have collapsed at that time, not 10-20 min later.
fierospeeder 3 years ago
these are the original columns,it was these that they cut,probably to get rid of the evidence along with all the shipped off steel,what happened to preservation of the crime scene ie the steel.
send me link of the pics of the firemen cutting the columns,because i cannot find them????thats a request to blue shadow 1996.
thankyou over and out.
waynough 3 years ago
"I see you have no experience using a torch. There is a video available of the iron worker that cut that exact beam."
Must be a conspiracy to make "debunkers" look like the parasitic braindead lying war-pig a--holes they truly are.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
The picture shown in the video is a picture taken after the columns,not just this one, they weighed about 14 ton and were sticking out of the rubble and had to be cut to remove and rescue the survivors.And they show Ironworkers cutting off theis piece,
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
blueshadow1996 wrote:
"And they show Ironworkers cutting off theis (sic)piece"
Who are "they" and where do they "show" it?
Show me the money shot.
hankypaulson 3 years ago
Then I would say give the money,,,,ever seen a girder being cut?,,
blueshadow1996 3 years ago
yes a torch will not cut like that and that fire men is part of the people helping find people alive so im sure their not cutting beams down that are just going str8 up in the air
sidneyoh 4 years ago 4
There were survivors found in that area. Steel was cut with a torch. ANd Firefighters were doing what they do. Rescue people.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
Add a bottle of oxygen and aceytelne torch and an Iron worker. Because I do see a cut column.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
If cut by acetylene torch would not look like that - molten material type, quantity and distribution and the angle of cut (including the angle though metal on top and bottom sides) are all NOT consistent with 'man operated' cutting of any kind.
But is consistent with controlled demolition cutting charge.
But we can all have an opinion right?! - even when we are just saying whatever we want regardless of the fact we are not experts and haven't done any research whatsoever!
selfreflectionII 4 years ago 6