@depierce "Another anti-theist who thinks that "Religious" means "Judeo-Christian-Islamic"
meh..."
Another person who can only argue against a strawmen he's concocted in his head.
Just because you use Christians, Jews or Muslims as an example of "Religious" people (which is in fact the most representative thing you could do) does not mean that group doesn't entail more people.
Hahahaha. Yeah, I'll hunt you down with my stick! No, I prefer hockey actually. I watch loads of fightingvideos on youtube. I hate watching floorball, but I love playing it! But anyway, eally weird video
If you created the universe when I clicked play then what happened before I clicked play? I couldn't have clicked play if there was no universe. If this is a joke then it's not funny. If it's not a joke, you have serious mental issues.
But it is not in my best rest to believe this. It would shrink my brain power to that of a kidneybean. (and we all know they did not invent the meals on wheels.)
"God is all powerfull. It is not that farfetched."
I disagree. If 'god' exists he is the most limited being conceivable.
If god knows with infallible certainty what he is going to do (omniscience) it is impossible for him to act otherwise. Thus he isn't all powerfull (omnipotent).
You got that backwards. As you are not omniscient you can't know what God is.
Neither can I. And no matter how any book tries neither can they.
Like any good scientist I have to start by saying: " I don't know." And as God is unavailable for experiments (let alone repeaters) I will stay at that point I'm afraid.
I stand corrected... partly. Indeed you don't need to that to reject or detect. But that wasn't the point.
If you don't believe in God, it is a pretty lame statement because it's not relevant to you. And on the other hand if you believe you *DO* believe you know God you also will think it's lame.
My point is:
If we say God has 'larger than life'-powers and knowledge, we can also not presume to (be able to) know what he can or can't 'do', 'think' or even actually 'be'. How could we?
If you hold the view that this 'god' thing is indeed beyond our capacity to 'know' so that we cannot even form a coherent ontology it makes no sense talking about *it* in the first place.
However most claimes made by the faithfull don't fall into that category and can more easily be made out to be bullshit.
Yup. Scientifically speaking that is true. And actually the difficulty in any faith. But that is why it is called faith.
When you try to prove anything scientifically from a religious point of view you get it the realm of bullshit.
As long as it is about faith and spirituality... you are untouchable. Your word, feeling opinion is as good as mine, as good as anybodies. (Though even that is under debate as you may have noticed.)
"...was discovered with guts and wet tissue inside it. It wasn't completely fossilized... "
When in fact, the entire thing was fossilized. The "mummy" aspect had to do with the fact that flesh and guts fossilized, as opposed to just bone. This in no way means that there was any "wet tissue" inside. Mummify means "dry".
Uh-you sound a little confused. "Mummified" by definition, means "dried out", and, in the context of dinosaurs, it simply means fossilized skin/flesh. The dinosaur is called "Brachylophosaurus", and there is no "wet tissue" in it. The "guts" are fossilized.
The T-Rex example has not been substantiated, though scientists are still studying it. The grad-student (a Christian) who made the discovery is upset that creationsists have used her research as evidence of the age of Earth.
"I heard in the news today a dinosaur was discovered with guts and wet tissue inside it."
Discovering tissue within dinosaurs is fantastic though not exactly anything "new". The funny thing is that T.rex tissue was used to analyze it's collagen and guess what... the results support evolution. However what does found tissue say about the age of that dinosaur? Can you provide evidence that it is young? C14 dating would deliver great results if it were young.
You know what the REAL origin of the universe is?......It is awareness. That's it, just pure, unbridled, infinite, cosmic awareness. The entire physical universe is merely a conduit for this awareness. This awareness has no wants, no preferences, no thoughts (as we think of thoughts), and no judgement, it is simply awareness.....It is unbound consciousness. Of course this may be a little too deep for some people to comprehend, and if there be a bone to strike, this Truth would cut through.
"Of course this may be a little too deep for some people to comprehend"
I do understand what you mean and I can see where you're coming from. But I only seriously entertain a conversation like this when I feel obliged to get on the good side of my relatives. In reality what you're saying is just mystical drivel.
If you percieve what I wrote as "mystical drivel" you "in reality" have no idea what I was speaking of.
Because if you truely understood what I was saying, you would reply with something along the lines of..."duuuh, thanks for stating the obvious." It would be as self evident as seeing that the sky is above and the earth is below.
If one has not pushed oneself to the brink of insanity from pondering the implications of death, one has not even given it a second of real thought.
Sigh... has it ever crossed your mind that I do understand your position but that I simply don't adhere to it? Why? Because you have nothing to back it up except more drivel.
"If one has not pushed oneself to the brink of insanity from pondering the implications of death, one has not even given it a second of real thought." - I have a very good relationship with death thanks. I'm done pondering.
.....However, it is my mistake, my illogical reasoning to claim that this video is stupid. It is in fact a small part of the Truth; the Truth being that: YOU ARE GOD.
You are God in the sense that you are an inextricable part of the awareness web or system, thus if you were to be forever exiled from existence, all other things would invariably follow. So in a very literal sense, you ARE the origin of the universe.
For example Bells Theorem and the 'Observer Effect, has striking parallels with the ancient Esoteric concept that all reality is the manifestation of an infinite Singularity which I choose to call Source, and most others call God.
"For example Bells Theorem and the 'Observer Effect, has striking parallels..."
While real scientists are trying to resolve the unresolved issues raised by Albert Einstein, Erwin Schrödinger, Eugene Wigner, David Bohm, and John Bell. You just use and apply the QM implications which seem to 'support' your belief system. This is pseudoscientific at best.
Yea isn't it great? Don't forget this is actually cdk007's work. So if you liked it I suggest you go check out his chanel as long as you're not already familiar with it.
Atheists have no problem believing that the universe create itself and that it is eternal, but have trouble believing that 'the source' create the universe and it is 'IT' who is eternal. Recents findings of quantum science seems to have a link with spirituality, that consciousness underlies all reality.
Another anti-theist who thinks that "Religious" means "Judeo-Christian-Islamic"
meh...
depierce 4 months ago
@depierce "Another anti-theist who thinks that "Religious" means "Judeo-Christian-Islamic"
meh..."
Another person who can only argue against a strawmen he's concocted in his head.
Just because you use Christians, Jews or Muslims as an example of "Religious" people (which is in fact the most representative thing you could do) does not mean that group doesn't entail more people.
infinit888 4 months ago
I got bored at about 20 seconds skipped to the end then wrote this.
Kiddeth 7 months ago
Bravo! This is brilliant, original and clever.
electronikita 1 year ago
:)) funny ... good job , that should wake up some people ...
22smoke 2 years ago
Waste of time! You are antichrist! I will fucking hunt you down!
limsniff 2 years ago
Shouldn't you be wanting to watch floorball vids instead anyway :P?
infinit888 2 years ago
Hahahaha. Yeah, I'll hunt you down with my stick! No, I prefer hockey actually. I watch loads of fightingvideos on youtube. I hate watching floorball, but I love playing it! But anyway, eally weird video
limsniff 2 years ago
I have memories of a Catholic Priest telling me to lick his balls. Can I just forget those, Lord?
cessna7035q 2 years ago 2
note to self: bookmark this vid and check it again when stoned... should be an interesting ride...
trisnjok 2 years ago
Nice appropriate picture at 3:36, eh?
spacejerk37 2 years ago
I fear you are going to have to elaborate because right know I have no idea what you could be trying to imply.
It can be anything from "good that you changed the picture to prevent false flagging" to "you're a racist".
infinit888 2 years ago
It's two people having sex! What else could I be implying?
spacejerk37 2 years ago
Dunno you tell me : )
infinit888 2 years ago
I was being sarcastic meaning it's inappropriate. I:P duh!
spacejerk37 2 years ago
If you created the universe when I clicked play then what happened before I clicked play? I couldn't have clicked play if there was no universe. If this is a joke then it's not funny. If it's not a joke, you have serious mental issues.
spacejerk37 2 years ago
It's a parody on religion. Due to it's unfalsifiable nature it's about as valid as any other religion out there.
Seems like you stepped into a religious debate again :P
infinit888 2 years ago
DAMN IT! Not again!
spacejerk37 2 years ago
What can I say - welcome to youtube!
infinit888 2 years ago
and what about you? who made you?
momosteur 2 years ago
That was me, i did it. My bad.
scubajon88 2 years ago
damn your good! could you create me a drug that's actually good for my health?
momosteur 2 years ago
Why the hell would you want that? jk
spacejerk37 2 years ago
hey...im your father....u may say NO but still i am...coz i made u dat way to say NO...so cut the crap n get a life son!
denimdevil666 2 years ago
r u god???
ladybug2313 2 years ago
No, he isn't God. He's some guy with way too much time on his hands.
spacejerk37 2 years ago
It seems just as valid as any other religeon.
Android811 2 years ago 2
I now know the true creator....lol
theyouthis 3 years ago
God is all powerfull. It is not that farfetched.
But it is not in my best rest to believe this. It would shrink my brain power to that of a kidneybean. (and we all know they did not invent the meals on wheels.)
Thank God for free will. (I believe)
PuppyZwolle 3 years ago
"God is all powerfull. It is not that farfetched."
I disagree. If 'god' exists he is the most limited being conceivable.
If god knows with infallible certainty what he is going to do (omniscience) it is impossible for him to act otherwise. Thus he isn't all powerfull (omnipotent).
infinit888 3 years ago
You got that backwards. As you are not omniscient you can't know what God is.
Neither can I. And no matter how any book tries neither can they.
Like any good scientist I have to start by saying: " I don't know." And as God is unavailable for experiments (let alone repeaters) I will stay at that point I'm afraid.
PuppyZwolle 3 years ago
"You got that backwards. As you are not omniscient you can't know what God is."
I think you've misunderstood me. I'm not claiming to know anything about god.
infinit888 3 years ago
Neither do I.
We have something in common. We could be friends! ;^)
PuppyZwolle 3 years ago
im sorry PuppyZwolle but your respones are kind of lame..
pinochska 2 years ago
Oh? Why are they lame?
PuppyZwolle 2 years ago
"You got that backwards. As you are not omniscient you can't know what God is." omniscience is not required to detect nonsense, neither to reject it.
pinochska 2 years ago
I stand corrected... partly. Indeed you don't need to that to reject or detect. But that wasn't the point.
If you don't believe in God, it is a pretty lame statement because it's not relevant to you. And on the other hand if you believe you *DO* believe you know God you also will think it's lame.
My point is:
If we say God has 'larger than life'-powers and knowledge, we can also not presume to (be able to) know what he can or can't 'do', 'think' or even actually 'be'. How could we?
PuppyZwolle 2 years ago
If you hold the view that this 'god' thing is indeed beyond our capacity to 'know' so that we cannot even form a coherent ontology it makes no sense talking about *it* in the first place.
However most claimes made by the faithfull don't fall into that category and can more easily be made out to be bullshit.
infinit888 2 years ago
Yup. Scientifically speaking that is true. And actually the difficulty in any faith. But that is why it is called faith.
When you try to prove anything scientifically from a religious point of view you get it the realm of bullshit.
As long as it is about faith and spirituality... you are untouchable. Your word, feeling opinion is as good as mine, as good as anybodies. (Though even that is under debate as you may have noticed.)
Like I said before:
"Thank God for free will."
PuppyZwolle 2 years ago
...actually, it WAS mummified, but you said:
"...was discovered with guts and wet tissue inside it. It wasn't completely fossilized... "
When in fact, the entire thing was fossilized. The "mummy" aspect had to do with the fact that flesh and guts fossilized, as opposed to just bone. This in no way means that there was any "wet tissue" inside. Mummify means "dry".
rodgierad 3 years ago
Uh-you sound a little confused. "Mummified" by definition, means "dried out", and, in the context of dinosaurs, it simply means fossilized skin/flesh. The dinosaur is called "Brachylophosaurus", and there is no "wet tissue" in it. The "guts" are fossilized.
The T-Rex example has not been substantiated, though scientists are still studying it. The grad-student (a Christian) who made the discovery is upset that creationsists have used her research as evidence of the age of Earth.
rodgierad 3 years ago
An accomplished parody. Well done.
DrObeoFwar 3 years ago
well, your just a fraction of my grand creation trying to convince me that a did not create you.
zpotek 3 years ago
Poor Guy :(
Tronicmania 3 years ago
2:18 big boobs lol
ShadowUmbreon23 3 years ago
I haven't created the Universe yet. It's still in the planning stages. When I do create it you'll remember this memory being implanted.
zonsb 3 years ago
"I heard in the news today a dinosaur was discovered with guts and wet tissue inside it."
Discovering tissue within dinosaurs is fantastic though not exactly anything "new". The funny thing is that T.rex tissue was used to analyze it's collagen and guess what... the results support evolution. However what does found tissue say about the age of that dinosaur? Can you provide evidence that it is young? C14 dating would deliver great results if it were young.
infinit888 3 years ago
This is too stupid for words. It is a 5/5 stars for stupidity.
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
"This is too stupid for words. It is a 5/5 stars for stupidity."
I can see that you didn't find it funny. I guess it struck to close to the bone.
infinit888 3 years ago
You know what the REAL origin of the universe is?......It is awareness. That's it, just pure, unbridled, infinite, cosmic awareness. The entire physical universe is merely a conduit for this awareness. This awareness has no wants, no preferences, no thoughts (as we think of thoughts), and no judgement, it is simply awareness.....It is unbound consciousness. Of course this may be a little too deep for some people to comprehend, and if there be a bone to strike, this Truth would cut through.
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
"Of course this may be a little too deep for some people to comprehend"
I do understand what you mean and I can see where you're coming from. But I only seriously entertain a conversation like this when I feel obliged to get on the good side of my relatives. In reality what you're saying is just mystical drivel.
infinit888 3 years ago
If you percieve what I wrote as "mystical drivel" you "in reality" have no idea what I was speaking of.
Because if you truely understood what I was saying, you would reply with something along the lines of..."duuuh, thanks for stating the obvious." It would be as self evident as seeing that the sky is above and the earth is below.
If one has not pushed oneself to the brink of insanity from pondering the implications of death, one has not even given it a second of real thought.
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
Sigh... has it ever crossed your mind that I do understand your position but that I simply don't adhere to it? Why? Because you have nothing to back it up except more drivel.
"If one has not pushed oneself to the brink of insanity from pondering the implications of death, one has not even given it a second of real thought." - I have a very good relationship with death thanks. I'm done pondering.
infinit888 3 years ago
"I am only a wooden puppet! I could never be such drivel as a REAL boy." Said the atheist to the mystic.
Just as your theory is of nothingness, it can give only nothing to your character.
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
"Just as your theory is of nothingness, it can give only nothing to your character."
Strawmen and an ad hominem wraped in one sentence... impressive. Don't even pretend that you know my mind/character without asking me any questions.
infinit888 3 years ago
.....However, it is my mistake, my illogical reasoning to claim that this video is stupid. It is in fact a small part of the Truth; the Truth being that: YOU ARE GOD.
You are God in the sense that you are an inextricable part of the awareness web or system, thus if you were to be forever exiled from existence, all other things would invariably follow. So in a very literal sense, you ARE the origin of the universe.
God bless.
AllahConsciousness 3 years ago
lmaol "because i love you all" that joke was from that dude who made the scale of dellusion (*snap* lost his name)
5star
SoldierCyfix 3 years ago
For example Bells Theorem and the 'Observer Effect, has striking parallels with the ancient Esoteric concept that all reality is the manifestation of an infinite Singularity which I choose to call Source, and most others call God.
dakidz 3 years ago
"For example Bells Theorem and the 'Observer Effect, has striking parallels..."
While real scientists are trying to resolve the unresolved issues raised by Albert Einstein, Erwin Schrödinger, Eugene Wigner, David Bohm, and John Bell. You just use and apply the QM implications which seem to 'support' your belief system. This is pseudoscientific at best.
infinit888 3 years ago
just brilliant...by the way, ken ham is a c**t
chrisbuxton1958 3 years ago
Yea isn't it great? Don't forget this is actually cdk007's work. So if you liked it I suggest you go check out his chanel as long as you're not already familiar with it.
infinit888 3 years ago
Atheists have no problem believing that the universe create itself and that it is eternal, but have trouble believing that 'the source' create the universe and it is 'IT' who is eternal. Recents findings of quantum science seems to have a link with spirituality, that consciousness underlies all reality.
dakidz 3 years ago
I'm actually quite puzzled as to how you came up with that subject by watching this movie.
"Recents findings of quantum science seems to have a link with spirituality, that consciousness underlies all reality."
Stop extrapolating the particle/wave duality of matter to absurd extremes.
infinit888 3 years ago