Added: 5 years ago
From: MorphinSRT4
Views: 78,720
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (543)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Good race

  • Mopar or no car! Although i have a neon an swapped s10,,,,

  • Wow.... isn't it amazing how a little 2.4L can consume almost 900 CFM of airflow at that pressure ratio? lol

  • Nice

  • 1 run camaro miss 2 run no nitrous all motor

  • SICK!!!

  • Try 0 to 60 mph in about five seconds flat and the quarter-mile in the mid-12s at more than 110 mph. FORGET Mustang and GTO, that's Mitsubishi Lancer Evo and Subaru Impreza WRX territory and at least a full second quicker than a stock SRT4 . More than that, those numbers put it ahead of its legendary budget-racer brethren like the 19691/2 Dodge Super Bee, which had a Six Pack 440-cubic-inch engine...AND THATS A STOCK STAGE 3 SRT4 THAT RUNS MID 12S FOR UNDER 10K NOW NUFFSAID !!!!

  • Props to the srt4, even though it took a decent sized turbo @30 psi, that camaro is FAST. Damn neons can really pull

  • Isnt the Camaro more powerful and faster than the SRT4. SRT4 are shitty slow cars. The EVO STI Camaro Cobalt SS and Ion Redlines can smoke a slow SRT4.

  • SRT4 are the worst and one of the ugliest cars ever build. SRT4 Say hello to the Mitsubishi EVO and Subaru STIs the worlds best Tuner Cars. SRT4 you are Dead. Camaro, Mustang, Challenger, Genesis Coupe, EVO, and STIs are the best Sport Tuner cars.

  • @USSVoyager5 to bad stock for stock the srt4 is faster then every car you just mentioned

  • @FiBTL18 no its not, the EVO X, STI, Camaro SS, Cobalt SS Turbo are faster than the SLOOOOOWWWW ASSSSSSS SRT4.

  • @USSVoyager5 to bad your wrong again "search" more facts are facts deal with it.

  • @FiBTL18 if i had my mazda 3 i can smoke you in the SRT4.

    .

  • @USSVoyager5 lol go beat a turbo v8 SL550 or a Maserati first then come talk to me

  • @FiBTL18 well smarty pants if you can find one under 20k then you have a race my friend... lol

  • Comment removed

  • See how the chevy lifted up, the 2nd run!!

  • there ya go a 30psi srt4 making 630whp

    /watch?v=ynmpiQW5xog&feature=r­elated

  • 600 hp lol ur funny...

  • World’s fastest four-cylinder based on a production car SRT4 ..

  • Comment removed

  • @USSVoyager5 Sounds like someone has seen alot of inexspensive tail lights of srt-4's in their overpriced fancy expensive EVO X... Which might I add is the absolute worst evo ever made, and not to mention the slowest... ouch. Are they eve faster than a regular lancer?

  • @ImTheFinGBest nope the EVO and STI has a more powerful engine than the SRT4, because the Evo and Sti has more than 230 hp which the SRT4 has, the Evo has 290 hp and all wheel drive the Sti has 305 Hp and all wheel drive. so check the specs of all evo sti and srt4 in internetautoguide. The Evo and STI are faster than the slow SRT4s. all wheel drive Evo and Sti vs 2wd SRT4.

  • @USSVoyager5 Ok, I thank you for not being a douchebag back like I was lol, Here are the specs 2011 subaru sti 0-60 5.2 sec, 2011 evo 0-60 4.8-5.0, msrp on both is between 33-37 thousand and that is gonna depend on how fast the car will ultimately go a fully loded car w/ auto is always slower. 2003-2005 srt4 0-60 is 5.3 sec and they are lighter than the 2 opposing vehicles, with that being said they only impose a pricetag of betweeen 5-9 thousand on average, look at all your freed up finances

  • @ImTheFinGBest EVO AND STI ARE STILL FASTER THAN THE SRT4 AND THEY ARE LIGHT CARS TOO

  • @USSVoyager5 Great arugement, I think I won... did I win? Seriously dude, 3500 pounds is not a light vehicle in anyone's world except for yours. And wh are you debating with the STI and Evo are two of my favorite vehicles, but its time to face fact bang for your buck unless your a rich fathead an sti or evo will get smoked by an srt4 dollar for dollar. Going fast and having a 500-600 dollar car payment do not go hand in hand ^^

  • @USSVoyager5 you clearly dont understand what production car means or you clearly dont know how to read production car...F.A.I.L.>

  • @icdeademopeople Worlds fastest over a long distance. The 2g eclipse w/ the 4g63 is the fastest in a quarter mile.

  • most people will agree that its easier to make power with a v8 but!!! if u have a little 4 cylinder and beat the big v8 its so much more fun then when a v8 beats a 4 cylinder its not always about power its power to weight a 350hp v8 that weighs 3600lbs has 0.09hp per pound but a 210hp 4 cylinder that weighs 1800lbs has 0.11hp per pound its the same reason why it takes a around an 800hp car to beat a 1000cc sportbike

  • Camaro might be mid fours on spray it sounds like it just has exhaust definitely not a 600 hp car

  • @jlyons18 its not gonna run with a 30psi srt-4 if its only making 400 on spray theres no way in hell 1) that would mean its a stock camaro with nothing but spray in which case the first run it woulda been completely destroyed 2) that srt-4 is making around the 500 whp mark on 30 psi so i can see the camaro at 600 on spray

  • @lilkdude8687 Sounds about right, that SRT is pushing about 500 @ 30psi so that would put the camaro at about 600 for it to 'slowly' walk away with the power to weight ratio between the two.

  • @Nutz4Tutz honestly i expected the camaro to pull the srt-4 harder than it did. the srt-4 is prolly 700 to 800lbs heavier than the camaro but still a good race

  • @lilkdude8687 srt-4's are 2700lbs what are you saying? and second my brother was pushing over 400whp at 25psi and the motor wasn't even built if this guy is built and running 30psi he's well over 500 if not near or at 600whp

  • @nickv11763 wrong gross vehicle weight on a stock srt-4 is 3800 roughly i used to own one i know what they weigh and the camaro weigh less by about 200lbs

  • @lilkdude8687 wikipedia is saying 2900lbs my brother who owns and and works on them for a living on the side says 2900lbs, I knew it was under 3000 pounds and thought it was 2700lbs I mean your talking about a 4 door neon thats front wheel drive how in gods name could it ever be 3800lbs and second your wrong about the camaro it's 3300lbs I mean no offense but an srt4 3800lbs were you thinking when you said that

  • @lilkdude8687 stock srt-4 is under 3k, I dailied one for 3 years before I got my evo8. How do you think 4cyl's keep up with v8's? simple logic, massively under weight. The v8's are bigger and heavier, that's how it evens out. The SRT team was able to achieve such great numbers with the SRT-4 because 1.) the engine is lighter and 2.) the vehicle (which is why they chose the neon platform) is lighter then most other cars they had at their disposal.

  • @Nutz4Tutz im just telling you what the door sticker on mine said

  • @lilkdude8687 I don't know why it would even say anything like that, but running mine on a dyno and modding it myself, I knew exactly what my curb weight was with and without me and my tools in the car. With me and my tools in the car it showed a weight of something like right around the 3100 range, something like 3094 to be more precise, iirc. So theres a mistake with your info, but I can guarantee with everything, that the car is no where near the camaros weight much less any where near 3800.

  • @lilkdude8687 Manufacturer Dodge Production 2003–2005 Assembly Belvidere, Illinois, United States Successor Dodge Caliber SRT-4 Class Sport Compact Body style 4-door sedan Layout FF layout Platform Chrysler PL platform Engine 2.4 L turbocharged DOHC I4 Transmission 5-speed NVG T-850 manual Wheelbase 105.0 in (2,670 mm) Length 174.4 in (4,430 mm) Width 67.4 in (1,710 mm) Height 56.0 in (1,420 mm) ******Curb weight 2,900 lb (1,300 kg) ***** There you go
  • @lilkdude8687 And for your camaro specs: Measurements Width: 74.1 in. Height: 51.2 in. Length: 193.5 in. Ground clearance: 4.5 in. Front track: 60.7 in. Rear track: 60.6 in. Wheel base: 101.1 in. Cargo capacity, all seats in place: 12.9 cu.ft. Maximum cargo capacity: 32.8 cu.ft. EPA interior volume: 81.9 cu.ft. Gross weight: 0.33 in. *****Curb weight: 3306 lbs.****** As you can see the camaro is 400 lbs heavier.
  • @lilkdude8687 It's the other way around. Iirc the SRT-4 is about 2700lbs like nick said, the camaro's weigh in at about 3500-3600 lbs. without the driver or any extras.

  • AMAZING CAMARO SOUND

  • this reminds me of the ford rs200 way back when in rally races.they used a 2.0l all forged internals engine with an aluminum block pushing like 30-40psi of boost, but they said the bad side was they would only get like 10hrs out of each engine and have to throw it away and start over.btw they ran like 500hp

    have fun replacing your engine

  • @paladain55 SRT4s arnt aluminum blocks. there steel and the two piece design makes them fairly strong for a stock motor. internals are forged and stock(with a good tune of course) they'll hold 500-550hp stock

  • im sorry no way that camaro has 600 hp....

  • there is no replacement for displacement that camaro running forced induction like that srt is there would be no race just the srt watching the camaro walk away there is no doubt that forced induction creates power

  • @jckickflip

    I'm so tired of the ignorant phrase, "no replacement for displacement". Total bullshit. Look at the old 5.0 mustangs, 1950's v12's, etc, etc. Tons of displacement, but slow as hell. Adjusting air/ fuel delivery, etc is what makes real power, not displacement. This isnt 1970 anymore!!!

  • @phillys976 very well said

  • good race

  • Modded and those little neons can get up an go, but stock is a joke..

  • Nothing is unbeatable. But I was glad to see a much closer race after he opened the bottle.

    How bad is the torque steer at 30psi?

  • now how much money did it take for the lil srt4 to get to that point its not that hard to build up that camaro and your right there is no replacement for displacement

  • @The572camaro 5k maybe. I've got about 1500.00 into my srt4 and i took it from 230hp to over 300hp. They are very easy to extract power from. Im still on the stock turbo too.

  • I even make fun of my self for having a srt 4. I know its still a neon

  • @joshieduckie HA! "Its still a neon".SRT4's are pretty quick tho

  • @joshieduckie damn straight, and we are proud of it.

  • @joshieduckie Neons Came into our world for 1 propose to have an srt4 power plant and drive faster than the ricer civic and shitvettes out there with a fugly bug eyed car.

  • @joshieduckie lol this kid is basically saying he thinks he samrt by saying he drivea a neon but really drives a Evo. bro ur evo or subie w.e overpriced less hp pos u drive is overratted geta grip,

  • @joshieduckie that's the thing, when you beat someone, and they give you shit, it's even funnier saying "yea I drive a neon and beat you...how do you feel now?" lol

  • Funny, all these SRT fan boys are talking down the fact that the camaro needs nos to win, Id love to see that SRT run with a camaro without forced induction.

  • @zr2chevypickupman SRT4's are stock with turbos, so good luck on your search for an NA SRT4.

  • skittle did work. i think i may take a bag of them now. store run.

  • i'll hand it to that skittle...that thing is fast

  • M.U.S.T.A.N.G.......... motor usually starts then always never goes :D

  • @Marlon02Gonzalez i didnt see a mustang in this vid

  • @sheeveington i know i just thought i should of thrown that in there

  • bye bye srt4 jajajajajajajaja

  • Look, this is my view of things. Sure the srt4 may be faster but, why the fuck would u want a little shoebox to drive around? It sounds like shit, looks like shit, and is small as shit. Faster isn't always better by any means. Just my opinion

  • go albuquerque!!

  • now thats a video!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • srt 4 rules....v8 this suka....150 shot and still didnt pull awaay from dat srt....lol........dat srt have ballsss...

  • V8's are always better no matter what...i will never lose to a rice burner

  • First and foremost s a srt4 is not a import bitches, and second nobody ever said srt4s are slow. thirdly camaros ss are not all that a 350 is still a small block. Point being a 350 is a baby engine compared to the big blocks and srt4 has half a engine of a camaro and still put it down on it. Now who ever responds to this make sure you no somthing about cars first and dont embarrass yourselves with the lack of knowledge

  • @SpenserHarris There is no replacement for displacement. Put all the modifications you want on that SRT-4...and put them on the Camaro too...those extra 4 cylinders make a lot of difference.

  • @SpenserHarris true the srt-4 is made buy dodge. although i did disagree with the guy above who said the whole "no replacement for displacement" saying is garbage. every gear head knows that displacement plays a bigggggg factor in most parts. but yes the srt 4 did put the camaro in its place before the shot of juice. either way both cars are fast. i mean i would mind having a 600whp camaro. but before i clicked the link i knew that with 30 psi the srt4 was going to win. its not rocket science

  • Lmao. WHY just WHY do import loving retards always bitch about no replacement for displacement? It IS FACT PEOPLE. Sure a small motor can make huge power.. but for christs sake if you take a BIGGER motor and do the equivalent mods it will make MORE power. THAT is the reasoning behind 'No replacement for displacement'. It is physics not just some dumb think AMerican car lovers brag about.

    Cool vids though the maro sounds good.

  • @5abivt There is a replacement...Its called boost, which makes alot of things even in this case 2.4l is better

  • @Kenuwine24 yes that replacement only goes so far though. i think 30 psi might be the max for this car. while putting 30 psi on the camaro will net differenet gains which is why the saying no replacement for displacement stands as fact. not knocking you or anyhting

  • @TheBopop you right..not arguing but 30psi added on a 600whp camaro...insane

  • i wanna know how the srt was maintaining traction? street slicks?

  • everybody here is flipping out about this. not starting any fights but the saying there is no replacement for displacement is true. dragsters run v8s. and produce 8000 hp. make the race even N/a vs N/a the camaro would have won. dont say oh the camaro needed the 150 shot...well the srt needed the turbo? makes no sense. bigger engine more air more fuel more power. if i put a turbo with 30 psi on our 468 id be making a lot of power and probably more than that srt. i love all cars

  • Wow that is a fast Srt4. On the second run, that Camaro sounded fuckin sweet! I wouldnt mind owning either of these two cars! Wow!

  • everyone saying that the v8 is weak or whatever but it is n/a vs t/c, and also, the camaro has a ton more weight than the srt-4. either way both cars are pretty sweet

  • That was a good second run.

  • would like to see a rematch that camaro is now making over 870 wheel no spray

  • A win is a win. Nitrous kicks ass! Same race at the track and the Camaro would destroy that SRT4 especially if the Camaro is an A4. Also, it takes so much more time, money and work to make an SRT-4 fast compared to an LS1 and then the SRT4 runs into all kinds of traction problems. LS1 camaro is a better car.

  • @blackice10521 you are dumb my friend i use to own a LS1 built camaro and now i own a srt 4 and trust me the srt 4 is alot cheaper to make fast and if you have 04 to 05 and have the LSD then traction is really not that big of a issue

  • glad to see the little srt put the camaro in its place, he needed that 150 shot. Its refreshing to all the see this, especially for all the V8 owners that live by "no replacement for displacement".

  • @RandySRT maro still beats him on spray....point of a race is to find whos faster... no "o he is spraying"...big deal.

  • @ESPxCONxXx Im not saying that spraying is wrong, there is nothing wrong about it. Im just saying that i like to see motors that are half the size keeping up, boosted, spraying, NA, whatever it may be.

  • @RandySRT

    There isn't though. Just saying.

  • @RandySRT You do realize what forced induction is right?!? It aids motors in "displacing" more air then they normally would ingest. So there is NO replacement for displacement weather it be done with cubic inches, boost, or a chemical enhancement.

    And of course nitrous cars need the bottle. If they are tuned to run the bottle (and on a 150 shot you do need to adjust timing and use colder plugs) they will run like crap N/A.

  • @inspector13jjf Of course, But its the people who believe that V8 engines or bigger are the only way to go, and that small engines cant produce power and be fast. The phrase "no replacement for displacement" is for the arrogant V8 owners that believe you need a bigger engine itself to be fast. It doesnt refer to ratio of air being displaced from a FI engine. Its about the people who believe NA is the only way to go, when it is not the case. Keep it clean, make it fast, thats all there is to it.

  • @RandySRT "no replacement for displacement". -what that actually means is that anything you do to a small engine (via parts, or turbos, etc) would be more beneficial power wise to a big engine such as a v8 or bigger.

    so i dont understand how you can say that and not realize that your being ignorant?

    now i believe there is no true replacement for displacement. But the most important thing i believe is that power to weight ratio is king! imports are cheaper but id rather drive a turbo muscle car!

  • @fitzboy3 I heard that V8 with a turbo or 2 anyone

  • @fitzboy3 SRT4 is not an import, its domestic.

  • @RandySRT i never said it was an import. its made by dodge, and the last time i checked dodge is still American....

  • @fitzboy3 When you said imports are cheaper, i assumed you talking about the car we've been discussing, the Neon srt4. And P/W ratio is really the only reason the srt4 is quick.

  • @RandySRT4 thats basically what ive been saying... lol

  • @fitzboy3 oh, i think i mixed up your comment with someone from another video, sorry. my confusion.

  • @RandySRT4 lol okay, now im confused as well.

  • @fitzboy3 i was mixing up your comments with someone else's from a different video.

  • @RandySRT oh come on.... you cant say he needed a 150 shot when the neon was running 30psi, thats alot of boost and the 150shot just gave the camaro his "boost"

  • @rotaryturbo88 the camaro already has his "boost", its called 2x the displacement.

  • @RandySRT Buy a v8 or stop the whining

  • @lendada13 i dont see any whining, just a camaro getting its ass handed to him by a NEON.

  • @RandySRT look at a couple of post down jr.

  • @lendada13 sorry dad, i still dont see any whining.

  • @RandySRT look harder son

  • @RandySRT pretty sure the camaro won...

  • @ESPxCONxXx LOL

  • @RandySRT ....whats so funny..... camaro won spraying..... its all part of racing.....

  • @RandySRT, hmm.. wanna talk bout horsepower adds.. then i can say little srt4 needed 30 lbs of boost to run with a camaro.. Why not race the both of em bone stock and see who'd win. once you get into modifiying vehicles anything can win.

  • @amyntage because the camaro already the advantage being rear wheel drive, and having more than twice the engine. Im not knocking the camaro, im just saying what most people hate to hear, that little neon is impressive...

  • @RandySRT ya, but the srt needed a turbo with 30psi to do it, if both were NA, then that saying is right....

  • @glareofspace Turbos dont "come with 30psi". The levels of boost can be adjusted via a wastegate, boost controller, or computer. I can make my stock turbo go way over 30 psi if i want it to. Its not going to hold up to the pressure and temperature because it wasnt designed to run that high. Also, turbos arent that expensive, especially when the car is already set up for it. You can a larger turbo for only a couple hundred bucks and just bolt it on and tune it. Very simple actually.

  • @RandySRT I dont know why you think you need to explain that to me....what im saying is NA VS NA the camaro would destroy that neon, you said you were glad to see that srt put the camaro in its place, the only way that srt could beat that camaro is a turbo with 30psi. there is no replacement when dealing with NA engines....that neon HAD to be boosted to beat that camaro, there are replacements for displacement....turbo, supercharger...etc

  • @glareofspace We'll never know since there is no such thing as an NA srt4. And before you say it, a neon is not an NA srt4, they have completely different engines.

  • @RandySRT ya, i know, but I dont know if there is a 4 cylinder engine that has a higher displacement than that camaros LS1........so we could make a call on it......

  • @RandySRT WHAT AN IDIOT, his car im sure is tuned for nos, so that means its not running real great off the spray @ WOT,and a little shot for a turbo is a fair trade!! i dont see how you think the camaro got put in its place? clearly not a race(with his shot)

  • @02sierra6L432tx Because the camaro has more than twice the motor than the neon, cost more than the neon, and is an all around classic. Its funny that a neon beat it.

  • @RandySRT OK SO.... i could go put a 383 stroker in a fuck*n gremlin, and eat anything up that pulled up next to me, that doesn't make the car more desirable, and just cause its got decent power and almost no weight, that i would drive that P.O.S. around with a smile on my face and the windows down! lol i would rather drive a 6 cylinder camaro before i would drive a unreliable cheaply made ugly ass dodge (its a neon bro!!)

  • @02sierra6L432tx OOOOOH. Your one of those guys. V8 chevy's are the only vehicles that are any good in the world, my bad... people who own neon srt4's like the fact that we are driving ugly ass neons. We think its funny beating up on V8's like camaro's with our ugly cheap cars. We are 100% fine with it, we dont need to compensate for anything by having a big motor.

    Oh yea, and im not your "Bro", i didnt even realize people still said that...

  • @RandySRT ...there is no replacement for displacement...throw even 10 psi on the LS1 and it would murder that 30 psi SRT4...it's just the sad truth for anyone who owns a 4 cyl..turboed or not..if you race a V8 that has the same mods as whats done to the 4 cyl it's being raced again'st ..then it's usually lights out for the 4 cyl...there are some fast ones out there..but i have yet to have one even come close to beating my procharged camaro SS...but i usually go after more worthy prey..other V8's

  • @RandySRT haha there is no replacement for displacemen i'v never seen a top fuel drag car runnign a four banger you know why there to small and can't build enough hp with the tiny displacement tell me have you ever seen a four cylinder pushing 5000HP cuz i havent but i have seen V8 pussing 5000 easy

  • @crazyskier540 hmm, v8's can push 5000hp easy... really. Somehow i dont think it is "easy" for anything to make 5000hp.

    I've said it before, and i guess i'll have to say it yet AGAIN... I am a car enthusiast, i like ALL cars for what they are. A 8 cylinder is in a completely different category as a 4 cylinder, there is, realistically, no comparison. They are vastly 2 completely different worlds. Why cant anyone just enjoy the internal combustion engine for what it is, big or small...

  • @RandySRT so mabey i exagerated a little bit i have nothing against four cylinders in fact i know a buddy building a sti which will soon have 1000hp i just don't agree with you saying that it is bad to live by no replacement for displacement and i own a camaro and don't think because i have 8 cylinders im going to kill everyone in a race i am actually able to realize that my car is not all that fast in this day and age and will lose by some 4 cylinders all im sayin is don't sterotype 8cyl owerns

  • @RandySRT V8s can make 5000hp pretty easily Top Fuel cars make like 8000bhp

  • @SpeedDemons420 i dare you to name ANY engine that can make 5000hp "EASILY". NOTHING CAN MAKE THAT POWER EASILY. It requires boat loads of cash, tons of careful calculations, and tuning geniuses, none of which is "easy". So again i say, show me something that can make that power easily.

  • @RandySRT Well obviously its not fucking easy i ment compared to other Engines V8s can make that kinda power easily show me a smaller displacement engine that comes close relax with the caps bro

  • @SpeedDemons420 YOU ARE FUNNY! MORE CAPS

  • @crazyskier540 so explain why a 6 cyc supra can make 5000hp ....and thats not a v8 nor does it have bigger displacement???

  • @icdeademopeople it's called a turbo's intake upgrades, cams, headers there are alot of way's to build horsepower but if you took the same turbo setup intake set up ect and put it on a engin with more displacement the larger engin would build more horsepower like god is it that hard to figure out straight up there is NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT all there is is addons and i forgot to say funnycars also have 8000HP with 8 Cyl

  • @crazyskier540 you can make anything have any amount of power you want as long as you can have the money to go along with it...im not argueing the fact of displacement they have v12 to as well as 32 piston airplane engines you beat him by a car and your happy 400hp is 400hp no matter where it comes from like i said you race a 400hp srt and pulled by a car at most so if he had 600hp im wondering how it would turn out do the math on that ..

  • @icdeademopeople actually you can't make anything have anyamount of power or they would use fourcylinders in all racecars because there light. and if the srt weighs less and has awd it would easily pull a camaro weighing over 3000Lbs but if it was a top speed race the camaro would take it.

  • @crazyskier540 THE SRT4 HOLDS THE FASTEST 4 CYC TIME IN THE WORLD WITH 221MPH WHAT WRONG AGAIN KID ...a friend of mine had a ws6 very fast car nice but always broke down big power v8s break i had a cobra built it up and so much shit breaks in v8s its unreal 4cyc or 6 is the way to go me..

  • @crazyskier540 worlds fasted 4 cyc record still stands SRT4 NUFF SAID ...

  • @icdeademopeople world fastest production car, V8 NUFF SAID...

  • @crazyskier540 no more like the 16 piston Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is but you can now slap the srt4 on that list of 1 million dollar exoctics lol you fail at no matter what you say and have no facts about anything just a shit talker you probley have a all motor honda and think its fast im not even going to reply to your dumb ass anymore ..talk to yourself in google duce ..

  • @icdeademopeople haha try henessy venom and im pre sure your the one with no facts i'v backed up what said and have proven over and over the v8 is better you just can't accept that. and i actually drive a 91 V8 camaro :D so how bout you go back to your 4cyl honda

  • @crazyskier540 i dont care about your old ass 91 camero i also have a 04 cobra v8s nothing new to me son..and v8 is not better for anything i can say v12 is better v10 is better none of them are better its up to what the driver perfers and i perfer to save gas and see you behind me thats all and the odds of you runing into a 1000hp let alone 600hp v8 anywhere is slim to none because there not reliable street cars period..you have a better chance of runing into a 600hp supra lol

  • @crazyskier540 henessy venom Ettore Bugatti makes it and you can make anything is fast as you want if you have deep pokets you can make a 4 cyc the size of a truck engine with pistons 9 inches wide if you want and the fact still remains it takes a 600hp camero to beat a 400hp neon by a car lol wow thats a walk alright whatever floats your boat there buddy you make no sense and own a 91 camero ugly as shit and slow as shit get off my nuts and go by a neon lol

  • @icdeademopeople ha the henessy venom is made by John Henessy lol and again no you can't it is impossible to get 8000hp from a 4cyl but you can get it from a bigblock V8 so again your WRONG! and i highly doubt that camaro has 600whp sounds nothing like it i think it is 600 at the crank with spray its probably around 450-500 at the wheels and with a hevier and older car. iv riddin in a car with 650Hp and it would have killed that neon and dont be jealous i drive a camaro and you drive a ugly neon

  • @crazyskier540 i could care less about what you find on google this is real life and i have a 600hp 240 that will put that shit in the dirt and i built it for 1000hp and my father builds v8s he hates 4baggers you could build a 8000hp block that gets what 3 runs out of it unless your sponsored your not doing that period ...your what i like to call a dreamer you dream watch videos all day arugueing with random people over what they have when you have nothing and are a hatter you know nothing lol

  • @icdeademopeople haha your such a hipocrit cuz if you read the prior comments you brought in what we own not me... and sorry i don't own a super expensive cras. im still in school lol and a think a 91 camaro for my fist car ain't bad and by next year it should have a 383 plus i never used google once i just like engins and whats wrong with dreaming??? and since i'm still young i may end up having everting i dream for come true.... i guess your just a grumpy old man.

  • @crazyskier540 you keep changeing the subject with everything you say kid you own a 91 camero never touched a motor in your life well that explains why you dont know shit lol and unless you work for it you better keep on with your dreams because thats all they will ever be..

  • @icdeademopeople i have not changed the subject once thats beeen you i'v just rplied to what you said and i have worked on engins quite a bit actually stop making asumptions all i said is there is no replacement for displacement and that is true that is where this started and where this will end

  • @icdeademopeople What Supra makes 5000bhp?????

  • @SpeedDemons420 i was bullshitin to see if he knew what he was talking about!!! we can see you know your cars lol as for him well you know that answer lol

  • so aaa what trans does the srt-4 have cause my buddy has and had an srt4.. the one he had blew the trans and it was on 18 psi and he had to buy a new input shaft. im thinkin the camaro has intake and exhaust and about 375 hp. people hate on ls1's but there badass engines after they get off the line lol.

  • god lower that camaro lol...

  • the camaro has come so far since filming now bousting big turbo cage an some proto type parts too

  • good to see the SRT holding it's own against the Camaro. ex-srt owner and now current camaro owner here and i must say the SRT is an extremely impressive 4cylinder turbo car and the motors are almost bullet proof. and a 3076r car running 30psi is no joke.

  • to the guy in the camaro, you'd have to be hellen keller not to see that damn tach that you have, its a pretty big one lol

  • @tbirdsport302 ....

    HAHAHAHAHA!

  • see that camero had to use nos to win and even so it barely stayed with him!freaking chevy owners some guys are just to big headed

  • @gavenxtremes26 ITS not  "NOS" its nitrous.

  • i just lol'd at some of this comments, if it was from a dig than the outcome would prob change (up to a certain speed) due to the poor traction on the fwd skittle (dr's will help though)

  • from an ex-srt4 owner and now a kb cobra guy point of view, i do believe the maro to be 600+ on the jug and the srt @30 psi (depending on turbo) anywhere from 500-550ish (that srt4 @600 would own that camaro due to power to weight ratio) with that said some of the v8 guys need to get their heads out of the asses, thinking that a 600rwhp camaro is unbeatable,

  • amen

  • @ abduran77,

    •The Neon SRT-4 has a Mitsubishi TD04 Turbocharger that boosts anywhere from 11 to 14 psi , 215hp, 245 tq stock with the above turbo. once turbo is off, its making 150hp 162 fpt. So sorry, i don't think any turbo in the world is going to give a car an almost 400 hp boost..if so..please refer me to it.. also, ive been in a mustang with 540hp.. and these dont match up.. i'de give it at best 375-450hp per car. Good car, but the numbers posted on this video are fake.

  • @amyntage, are you for real? really, lol, i understand the 150hp speculation you are throwing w/o the turbo, but guess what, that's how it came from factory, lets take couple of cylinders out a stock v8 to see how it does, (see my point) but to say any turbo in the world won't give a car 400hp +\- is a moot statement that shows you sir dunno anything of what you speak,

  • @abduran77, I fail to see your point in removing a 'couple of cylinders' out of a v8. Then it'd be a v6, alot of newer v8s are making 400+ hp. Granted the one in this video is an lt1 which stock make 276hp. The best turbo i've heard of, STS turbo. gave a ls1 camaro (stock hp - 319) with a single turbo @ 8 psi gave it 509 hp. --190hp gain from a turbo on a v8 car.

  • @abduran77, i Dont know how much a gt30t6r will give an increase in hp, but seeing as he said this camaro had 600+hp, and the srt4 (which only listed mod is a turbo) ill give it about 375-425hp at best it just wouldnt most likely hang from a rolling where hp / weight ratio isn't so heavily needed.

  • Edit: gt3076r **