this version is far more rough cut which makes it appear more artsy but i like the psychadelic feel of the klaxons. their version sets you in another dimension.
No it doesn't add, it reduces, as it would be hard to add anything without being ridiculously over the top. And by reducing song gains something, it's more grounded and more honestly joyous. Both versions work fine for me, but this one is obviously a cover (it should be more Kaiser Chefs to stand alone).
it isn't as annoying as the original...
TanTaninchen 4 months ago
now this is nick hodgsons backing vocals at his very best, except ruby of course lol XD
godzassassin96 9 months ago
I think that Kaiser Chiefs version is better.
I love this so much.
KCKine 1 year ago 3
I knew this version longer than the klaxons version and i like it much more.
Crypterix 1 year ago
This isn't bad, but it's too...... jolly? merry? perky? I like the original way better too.
fposadap 1 year ago
it's good too but i prefer klaxons too.
triptracker 1 year ago
Its good, not as good as Klaxons though just my opinion! =D
Meggiilyy 2 years ago
klaxons version is wayyyy better
teentitans24 2 years ago
the only thing the klaxons did better was the ooo oooo oooo ooo oo aaah ah bit das about it to be honest
jordannw6 2 years ago
this does not have the power of the first version
truegraven 2 years ago
this version is far more rough cut which makes it appear more artsy but i like the psychadelic feel of the klaxons. their version sets you in another dimension.
christiew8 2 years ago 5
oh f*** off klaxons r beta
iluvedd129 3 years ago
I love both versions! :D
AngryMob92 3 years ago
i love this verion it is 10 time better than the klaxons! kaiser chiefs <3
kaiserchiefsmad 3 years ago
juifffff
louis14produce 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gay
Kiragano 3 years ago
this version is more happier...
its not horrible, but
yeah
i prefer the klaxons version.
ArcticGirli 3 years ago 24
Of course Klaxons did it better, but this is good too :)
blackgnrwidow 3 years ago 23
ohmygod
the klaxons version is way better than this.
sugarmeadow 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God..
This sounds awful..
Holy crap. Bloody hell.
Just give the original one by Klaxons.
Hippyfizz578 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
erm the original wasn't by the klaxon's it was by Grace
hello2900 3 years ago
sorry bein a dipshit, i was thinkin of It's not Over Yet
hello2900 3 years ago
its ok.
but its WAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY worse then the original.
I like it but still its not good compared to the Klaxons!
tsk tsk. i never have heard a good cover of a Klaxons song.
The closest was crystal castles.
Blink182AVAP44 3 years ago
They ruined it, Completely.
Kialinna 3 years ago
i think the klaxons did do it better
vonnamama101 3 years ago 4
i like the oooo0o0 ahh bit lol i fink its mint but it is a bit diffrent but its still fab
LittleDee2k6 3 years ago 5
i think the klaxons did it better!
TheFray150028 3 years ago
UUUUhhhhhh!! AAhhhhhhhhh!! UUhhhhhhhhhh!!!! AAAhhhhhhh!!! You are turning me on! É bem boa!!!
neoperl1971 3 years ago
This cover doesn't add anything to the song, it just sounds like the Klaxons version with all the soul sucked out of it.
crosswalkernie 3 years ago 2
No it doesn't add, it reduces, as it would be hard to add anything without being ridiculously over the top. And by reducing song gains something, it's more grounded and more honestly joyous. Both versions work fine for me, but this one is obviously a cover (it should be more Kaiser Chefs to stand alone).
levchek 3 years ago
great
AntoinetteBaby 3 years ago
they sped it up a lot... it looses something
TrustNo121000 3 years ago
Yeah, it almost sounds like a kiddish song..
tD09fTl 3 years ago
COOL
Lukianetz19 3 years ago
damn good cover
mattysen 3 years ago
Great cover! i think its just as good as the origional!
jtbs07 3 years ago
tis betta
jamesieoconnell 3 years ago 2
love it
godlovesfrogs 3 years ago
pretty cool
locandsoc 4 years ago
pretty cool
locandsoc 4 years ago