Added: 7 months ago
From: EliThompsonKMI
Views: 733
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Saying "non-elastic model" is not correct, is should be said "less-elastic model". Almost everything is elastic, at a lower or higher degree.

    The model is an expanded octahedron.

  • I applaud all exploration and model building; that's how we learn new things.

    @1:30, Eli says, "It has no elasticity in it, which is a hallmark of tensegrity." This does not sound correct. I know of nothing in "Synergetics" or "A Fuller Explanation" which says this.

    The big model has no elements at tension. Spokes in a bicycle wheel are tensile elements, but the spokes in Eli's model are not at tension. It's a compression-based model with 6 large and 24 short struts -- not a tensegrity.

  • Hi Eli,

    two comments: 1) You used two tensegrity icosahedra, (not tetrahedra).

    2) Simple models like these make it hard to conclude anything about fascia. Although I think of our physical structure as complex modular tensegrity, strings in models like yours represent the quasi linear pull of tendons. Building mesh models could illustrate better how elasticity of fascia affects movement range and quality.

    Thanks anyway, besides minor things a great mini lesson.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more