The world trade towers fell due from the incredible damage done from the two planes. However, building seven imploded. More than 1,500 scientists, engineers and demolition experts agree on this assessment. As for the argument that building seven had a "massive scoop torn out.. it rings hollow. Tim McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma City did far worse damage and that building didn't fall down.
More half-baked analysis from people with no credentials.
That piece of debris changed paths and smoke followed it! Obviously nano-thermite rather than a non-uniform, burning piece of debris in the midst of a massive eddy of unnatural air current!
Stuff accelerated faster towards the ground! It must be nano-thermite rather than aerodynamics!
Obviously the government has paid off all of the credentialed physicists that would support this theory so that you're a lone voice in the dark.
No skyscraper in modern history has collapsed due to fire before or after September 11th 2001. So follow the thinking, if building 7 was a preplanned demolition, it was done so in conjunction with the destruction of the twin towers. Which then begs the question, what else besides two planes brought down the twin world trade towers?
@user6008 What other skyscrapers in modern history have been hit by a 400,000 pound airliner carrying 20,000 gallons of jet fuel flying on a direct course at it's maximum, throttle open velocity?
@user6008 Note also that wtc7 had a massive scoop torn out of the front by falling debris. You don't see that in pictures or video as it's obscured by smoke but there are several corroborating eye-witness reports on it. It wasn't 'just' fire that brought wtc7 down, it was fire + extreme structural damage that was observed by hundreds of people with no reason to lie.
As for explosive forces... does the guy in the video not think that having floors rapidly collapsing on one another will generate extreme air pressure that would act like an explosion and fire stuff out?? wake up!! thats the huge building collapsing!! you don't need explosives to explain all that you're seeing...911infowarrior you're a nutbar mate
The actual object immiting the smoke could be going in the perfect curve as it falls and NOT twisting and turning at all, and still produce the twisting smoke trail....how?? it could be spining with smoke being emmited from one side....we only se the white smoke and not the actual object that could be much wide than the smoke trail and spinning...when the man in the video say CLEARLY it contains explosive I'd say CLEARLY hes a nutbar
FireCaptE9--these goofs stay awake at night thinking of ways to conjur up stories about the gov't taking down the trade center buildings. They canot fathom the intense heat from the planes siftening the steel of the buildings, making the massive weight above too much to support. Being the one tower was hit in the middle, tho it burned less time it fell first--maybe due to the many more floors above it than the second building. We will never be free of these conspiracy theory nutcases.
@Rangerbelt And do you know that the building was built to withstand several jet impacts? As to "intense heat" whaa? It you want to know what intense heat is, go to a smelting plant. Also, please explain how the buildings directly adjacent to WTC 1&2 took the impact of those buildings + fires and yet they still stood yet WTC 7 was blocks away but reduced to nothing in the same fashion as WTC 1&2.
Inside Job.....Thermate prefabricated to fit beams and installed....large crew never needed, just access......Drone Planes with laser targeting.....Building 7 falls without losing it's shape.....Demolition.....WTC 1 and 2 turn to dust before even hitting the ground.....Demolition......Inside Job....."Pull it"
Who was the Saudi Prince that offered Guiliani millions after 9/11? Remember Guiliani refused to take the money? <------- I think it was all done for the masses and television.
mate don't listen to all these ass-holes, i will back u up you have a very good theory and evidence........ how will terrorists get their hands on nano thermite for one its very expensive and how would they get in to the wtc carry nano t on them and paint it on????????
It does not matter what Chandler "thinks" the white object is, nor the change in direction!
What matters is that there is no accompanying bright light that would have shone through the smoke!
Thermite glows definitively when burning, and if it is responsible for the "smoke" in the video, then other tell-tale signs would be there, most notably the emitted light!
C'mon Chandler, even you should know that despite your lack of expert knowledge!!
according to the 911 Commission the fires and the impact of the planes caused the upper floors to collapse ( pancake ) in the case of the WTC 1 that meant about 10 or so stories as an intact unit pancaked onto the lower floors ..why didn't the floors fall to the N-E-S-W when it met resistance instead of just falling str8 down ? I have seen a video showing the antenna on the top of the WTC fell to the side still attached to those 10 upper floors and did not pancake str8 down
the reason there is no action taken in the USA is that those at the top orchestrated this. the people at the top of government and industry have financial control of the media. no reason for them to ruin their investments
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?
How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?
well my good friend, people find it so hard to believe that our own government could be responsible for something so horrific that they try their hardest to come up with a lengthy and rationalization that is quite irrational and groundless just thought up on the spot with little to no scientific thought put into it. (ah the power of denial) ignorance is bliss to some... yet it's hurting everyone else. ie we never would have went Iraq, never would have killed so many Iraqis, no recession... maybe
sorry, but Iraqis must be killed. nation with such strong beliefs pose a major threat to the entire world. ie they`re ready to kill for their religion. such things should not be allowed.
This is interesting, what i got is maybye the dust was sucked back or " turned" by the building collapsing?, and that it sucked the dirt back towards it, if that makes any sense lol
If it was nano-thermite why was it not burnt,since you know once ignition begins it cant be stopped.if you are reffering to a research paper you naybe never read it because it states they could not ascertain its prescense.They only found one ulta fine grain aluminum element using an e-scope. No oter metastable imtermolecular composites were found.Because they have no samples of nano-thermite they say more study was needed. prompting all thruthers to say they found the smoking gun
The lies served to commit American and British soldiers to go to war with the muslims not for justice for those that died here but for OIL nothing else, people are to the goverment exendable so i say F.... the rulers and lets unite as we most certainly are not a united people and they need to be held accountable.
It's not the government's story you dumb son of a bitch. You probably have never seen thermite let a lone used it. You have been watching lose change one to many times. You have become a nutter locked in a cellar with a tin foil hat.
Building 7 fell because of the under ground inferno took out it's support in the center and it caved in on itself. The other buildings falling pumped enough air in to the inferno it cut through steel like an acetylene torch it is as simple as that. Demolition goes upward not downward so that is just as failed. The only thing that is flaming here is the homo that posted this video. He is an ass banger. there was no thermite. Did you know playing cards test positive for C4 comon get real.
They either weren't constructed in the same way requiring a "steel" support structure passing through the underground parking infrastructure, or weren't part of it all together. You have to remember it was like a little highway down there. All those people needed a place to park. If you study how a blast furnace works it was an inferno underneath each time a building fell it was like a giant below it would have vaporized nearly any thing in its path. In order to cut steel you need air.
bellow* rather typo. Any way those buildings each time they fell displayed forced air into the under infrastructure any of the buildings that didn't require that steel support didn't fall. Some times older is better. The others were simply to far a way; the heat displaced into ground, concrete and earth. As far as 7 being demolished or any of the other buildings controlled demolition works upward first the building hangs then gives you will see in 7 the center gives then caves inward.
You'll notice in 7 that it had a center structure that supported the whole building. When it either softened or was burnt through you see it clearly give it up. It sunk the building crumbled in on itself. While plausible that some state buildings in some 1960s paranoid operation could have been wired so they wouldn't be captured by then the Soviets. That wasn't the case example Bush calling in some order to evacuate then they blew building there were no signs of controlled demolition.
As far as thermite people acting like nutters about it. As I stated earlier an old deck of Play Cards will detect as C4. I have ignited thermite before believe me there would be o non ignited thermite left just evidence it burned. If there was any demolition for real the evidence with be all over NY Harbor even let alone near ground zero. The conspiracy was afterward covering up for Bush. What we had was one beyond dumb Pres. and a smart terrorist his Dad help create.
that doesnt make sense. jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to burn through construction grade steel, and if the pancake story was true, the steel core would still be standing to this day. the only thing that would send the core down is something that does burn hot enough to go through it. not to mention the dozens of reports and interviews of people saying they heard multiple explosions before and during the collapse and the pops that can be seen on film if u slow down the collapse
I agree that Rudy was warned he said he was and we all know that. If you're trying to say people in the know tipped him off that is not the case. If you remember there was one or two structural engineers in the building went to to check the damage. When he got up to the point of damage he realized he was walking talking dead. Matter a fact he knew he wasn't getting out he was a hero in the fact his warning saved more lives at the cost of his own.
I never said open air jet fuel melts steal. It can and well soften it and that is just what it did. Even Dr. Mitchio Kaku will tell you you can repeat the same experiment in your own home over "soften steel" not melt. The inferno was under ground acting like a blast furnace heating those beams bottom to top they lost their temper and gave up. It wasn't hardened steel any more the skeleton was done. Like a wishbone in vinegar trying to hold all that weight.
Those pops mean nothing if you look at the clips you showed me in the demolition they weren't pops their were pieces being blown free. Those were caused by heated concrete popping, and pockets of gas used for fuel in the building lets not forget their was natural gas in the building. I can tell you never been camping and made a fire pit. try using moist rocks once you'll get a popping effect too. Your conspiracy in not their it's Haliburton that is where the real on was.
and what about the fact that news outlets were reporting collapses BEFORE they actually happened? the fact that the towers were built specifically to withstand a hit from a plane? the fact that Guiliani has been interviewed saying he was told the towers were goin to collapse? there is simply too much evidence against the official story. there's evidence that the CIA trained the pilots of the planes. i could go on and on and on
The first clip you mention only demonstrates what I had said. You see the center support sink in and give up. On controlled demolition right side photo you'll see the unmistakable signs of demolition note only on the right the plume is blowing upward as in controlled demolition. On the left building 7 no explosive plumes the center support just gave up. The 2nd shows 7 sinking, because the center that supported it gave up after that much heat it lost it's temper it turned nearly jelly.
Your second clip about mid way you'll see the the storage tanks and ac structure in the very center sink in first. If there was any other point to the video about the command center being empty. I'd have got the fuck out of their too it was common sense. As far as the news reports their was Chaos and of course some of them jumped the gun. No different than Rather calling the Election for Gore and getting fired on that day idiot Bush Jr was elected. As far as the buildings vs. planes...
Yes you are right there were designed to handle the "IMPACT" of a plane they both did. They also were designed in the 60s and the second tower opens I think in 70. The reason they were designed to handle the impact was this isn't the first time our biggest building and been hit by a plane. The Empire State building took a hit by a plane before the Twins were built. It survived it of course, because it wasn't a modern plane loaded down with fuel.
You said there is to much evidence it's a lot of hear say you mean. You watched a bit much Loose Change ok? You should stick with verifiable facts. CIA agents trained as terrorists comon that is as ludicrous as the Lone Gun Man theory. You sound reasonably intelligent so don't get dragged in to non-sense now. Any thing can be made to look bad. You're also forgetting all the 1000 of people that have to keep it a secret. You're nearly saying the moon landing didn't happen and no one told anyone.
first off, ive never even seen loose change i did the research on my own. i dont think you're right in your thinking but u have a real reason for believing what u do and seem like youve seen or heard of most of the evidence, so ill just respectfully agree to disagree
don't be a dumb ass nutter if there was Thermite in those quantities you would see it flare and it would have cut the beams right in those areas and the building would have tipped right in those places. What happened was the steel lost it's temper softened not melted you can do the same in your oven at home. The steel was heated by fire and cooled by rushing air it fractured like a hot marble dropped in water. There only melted steel was under ground in the inferno below.
Building 7 fell because of the under ground inferno took out it's support in the center and it caved in on itself. The other buildings falling pumped enough air in to the inferno it cut through steel like an acetylene torch it is as simple as that. Demolition goes upward not downward so that is just as failed. The only thing that is flaming here is the homo that posted this video. He is an ass banger. there was no thermite. Did you know playing cards test positive for C4 comon get real.
We didn't knock our own buildings down like I stated earlier there was no termite. Most of these idiots that believe every thing they hear has never seen thermite. You can get readings for C4 off a deck of bicycle playing cards. The only conspiracy there was is the fact that Bush didn't want Osama because then the war on terror stops. that and Abuigraib &n Cheney Haliburton which he is under indictment for. No Osama hasn't paid the price yet Bush wanted him to retire like Castro.
don't be a dumb ass nutter if there was Thermite in those quantities you would see it flare and it would have cut the beams right in those areas and the building would have tipped right in those places. What happened was the steel lost it's temper softened not melted you can do the same in your oven at home. The steel was heated by fire and cooled by rushing air it fractured like a hot marble dropped in water. There only melted steel was under ground in the inferno below.
try inverting the video colors and watch it
kGmusicpage 1 week ago
try iveft
kGmusicpage 1 week ago
The world trade towers fell due from the incredible damage done from the two planes. However, building seven imploded. More than 1,500 scientists, engineers and demolition experts agree on this assessment. As for the argument that building seven had a "massive scoop torn out.. it rings hollow. Tim McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma City did far worse damage and that building didn't fall down.
user6008 2 months ago
More half-baked analysis from people with no credentials.
That piece of debris changed paths and smoke followed it! Obviously nano-thermite rather than a non-uniform, burning piece of debris in the midst of a massive eddy of unnatural air current!
Stuff accelerated faster towards the ground! It must be nano-thermite rather than aerodynamics!
Obviously the government has paid off all of the credentialed physicists that would support this theory so that you're a lone voice in the dark.
jookieloom 2 months ago
No skyscraper in modern history has collapsed due to fire before or after September 11th 2001. So follow the thinking, if building 7 was a preplanned demolition, it was done so in conjunction with the destruction of the twin towers. Which then begs the question, what else besides two planes brought down the twin world trade towers?
user6008 5 months ago
@user6008 What other skyscrapers in modern history have been hit by a 400,000 pound airliner carrying 20,000 gallons of jet fuel flying on a direct course at it's maximum, throttle open velocity?
any data on that anywhere?
jookieloom 2 months ago
@user6008 Note also that wtc7 had a massive scoop torn out of the front by falling debris. You don't see that in pictures or video as it's obscured by smoke but there are several corroborating eye-witness reports on it. It wasn't 'just' fire that brought wtc7 down, it was fire + extreme structural damage that was observed by hundreds of people with no reason to lie.
jookieloom 2 months ago
Deny Ignorance. Thank you 911infowarrior.
res8898 5 months ago
hmmm...an inside job aye? Maybe the collapse was cause by global warming? You people crack me up!
Chrvl88 6 months ago
As for explosive forces... does the guy in the video not think that having floors rapidly collapsing on one another will generate extreme air pressure that would act like an explosion and fire stuff out?? wake up!! thats the huge building collapsing!! you don't need explosives to explain all that you're seeing...911infowarrior you're a nutbar mate
OtagoMark 6 months ago
The actual object immiting the smoke could be going in the perfect curve as it falls and NOT twisting and turning at all, and still produce the twisting smoke trail....how?? it could be spining with smoke being emmited from one side....we only se the white smoke and not the actual object that could be much wide than the smoke trail and spinning...when the man in the video say CLEARLY it contains explosive I'd say CLEARLY hes a nutbar
OtagoMark 6 months ago
How long did you stare at the video to make this up?
GarrusN7 9 months ago
FireCaptE9--these goofs stay awake at night thinking of ways to conjur up stories about the gov't taking down the trade center buildings. They canot fathom the intense heat from the planes siftening the steel of the buildings, making the massive weight above too much to support. Being the one tower was hit in the middle, tho it burned less time it fell first--maybe due to the many more floors above it than the second building. We will never be free of these conspiracy theory nutcases.
Rangerbelt 10 months ago
@Rangerbelt And do you know that the building was built to withstand several jet impacts? As to "intense heat" whaa? It you want to know what intense heat is, go to a smelting plant. Also, please explain how the buildings directly adjacent to WTC 1&2 took the impact of those buildings + fires and yet they still stood yet WTC 7 was blocks away but reduced to nothing in the same fashion as WTC 1&2.
TheXxneowolfxX 5 months ago
You don't reckon GRAVITY had anything to do with the "sudden change in direction" huh?
FireCaptE9 10 months ago
@FireCaptE9 You clearly do not have even a high school understanding of gravity.
Are you special? You know, developmentally challenged? A child left behind?
abram730 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Inside Job.....Thermate prefabricated to fit beams and installed....large crew never needed, just access......Drone Planes with laser targeting.....Building 7 falls without losing it's shape.....Demolition.....WTC 1 and 2 turn to dust before even hitting the ground.....Demolition......Inside Job....."Pull it"
Who was the Saudi Prince that offered Guiliani millions after 9/11? Remember Guiliani refused to take the money? <------- I think it was all done for the masses and television.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
mate don't listen to all these ass-holes, i will back u up you have a very good theory and evidence........ how will terrorists get their hands on nano thermite for one its very expensive and how would they get in to the wtc carry nano t on them and paint it on????????
littleowen212 10 months ago
us killer 9-11 have very clear nowing for 9 years but now more now it..at no building of still collapse like that.
invistegation now let the killers enter the scene now..wee all now its is.
MultiAirbrusher 11 months ago
I'm saddened to hear that you teach physics because based on your flawed analysis in your videos, I doubt you teach the subject very well.
lidarman2 1 year ago
It does not matter what Chandler "thinks" the white object is, nor the change in direction!
What matters is that there is no accompanying bright light that would have shone through the smoke!
Thermite glows definitively when burning, and if it is responsible for the "smoke" in the video, then other tell-tale signs would be there, most notably the emitted light!
C'mon Chandler, even you should know that despite your lack of expert knowledge!!
Care to explain your way out of this one??
Humantidote 1 year ago
This is a load of crap!
I don't care what size they are, nano-termites could not have caused the collapse of any of the WTC buildings!
Termites feed off of the cellulose in wood!
Even nano-termites that would be invisible to the naked eye cannot digest concrete and steel!
Sometimes, truthers can be so stupid.
Bermas is an idiot!!
Humantidote 1 year ago
according to the 911 Commission the fires and the impact of the planes caused the upper floors to collapse ( pancake ) in the case of the WTC 1 that meant about 10 or so stories as an intact unit pancaked onto the lower floors ..why didn't the floors fall to the N-E-S-W when it met resistance instead of just falling str8 down ? I have seen a video showing the antenna on the top of the WTC fell to the side still attached to those 10 upper floors and did not pancake str8 down
xadam2dudex 1 year ago
It was fucking windy that day dumbass, you guys need to get a life
GutZG8tor 1 year ago
the reason there is no action taken in the USA is that those at the top orchestrated this. the people at the top of government and industry have financial control of the media. no reason for them to ruin their investments
graygoescommando 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?
Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?
How much nanothermite did Niels Harrit estimate was used in the supposed controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, & 7?
ctcole77 7 months ago
If this is so evident, why there is no action taken in USA
harijsk 2 years ago
well my good friend, people find it so hard to believe that our own government could be responsible for something so horrific that they try their hardest to come up with a lengthy and rationalization that is quite irrational and groundless just thought up on the spot with little to no scientific thought put into it. (ah the power of denial) ignorance is bliss to some... yet it's hurting everyone else. ie we never would have went Iraq, never would have killed so many Iraqis, no recession... maybe
brucelee6790 1 year ago
sorry, but Iraqis must be killed. nation with such strong beliefs pose a major threat to the entire world. ie they`re ready to kill for their religion. such things should not be allowed.
harijsk 1 year ago
hooray for genocide huh?
brucelee6790 1 year ago
not really, just purge the religion.
harijsk 1 year ago
why not purge religion all together?
brucelee6790 1 year ago
I haven`t said that. but you gotta start somewhere, you can`t take on everyone at the same time, they`re just to much.
harijsk 1 year ago
you're a fucking idiot. Just stop communicating with other humans.
brucelee6790 1 year ago
what makes you think that? god? :D
harijsk 1 year ago
This is interesting, what i got is maybye the dust was sucked back or " turned" by the building collapsing?, and that it sucked the dirt back towards it, if that makes any sense lol
WOWman1919 2 years ago
This is an excellent piece of evidence.
DarkwingScooter 2 years ago
If it was nano-thermite why was it not burnt,since you know once ignition begins it cant be stopped.if you are reffering to a research paper you naybe never read it because it states they could not ascertain its prescense.They only found one ulta fine grain aluminum element using an e-scope. No oter metastable imtermolecular composites were found.Because they have no samples of nano-thermite they say more study was needed. prompting all thruthers to say they found the smoking gun
blueshadow1996 2 years ago
Typical debunker = Ad hominem attacks and an inability to use logical thinking.
paulymac 2 years ago
Your governments have you by the balls. Question is what are you going to do about it?
85mrgardner 2 years ago
The lies served to commit American and British soldiers to go to war with the muslims not for justice for those that died here but for OIL nothing else, people are to the goverment exendable so i say F.... the rulers and lets unite as we most certainly are not a united people and they need to be held accountable.
nidgetucker 2 years ago
9/11 = controlled demolition!
paulymac 2 years ago
Dumb ass demolition blows upward
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
No always, you fucking sock puppet. watch?v=cRnW6FNZabo
911Infowarrior 2 years ago
watch?v=cRnW6FNZabo
Don't think for yourself. Question nothing. Keep repeating the gov't story. You ignorant sheep!
9/11 was an inside job!
paulymac 2 years ago
It's not the government's story you dumb son of a bitch. You probably have never seen thermite let a lone used it. You have been watching lose change one to many times. You have become a nutter locked in a cellar with a tin foil hat.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
Great stuff, 5 out of 5.
murdermayhem666 2 years ago 4
Building 7 fell because of the under ground inferno took out it's support in the center and it caved in on itself. The other buildings falling pumped enough air in to the inferno it cut through steel like an acetylene torch it is as simple as that. Demolition goes upward not downward so that is just as failed. The only thing that is flaming here is the homo that posted this video. He is an ass banger. there was no thermite. Did you know playing cards test positive for C4 comon get real.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
if thats why building 7 collapsed, why didnt all the buildings around do the same?
grimmunkey 2 years ago
They either weren't constructed in the same way requiring a "steel" support structure passing through the underground parking infrastructure, or weren't part of it all together. You have to remember it was like a little highway down there. All those people needed a place to park. If you study how a blast furnace works it was an inferno underneath each time a building fell it was like a giant below it would have vaporized nearly any thing in its path. In order to cut steel you need air.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
bellow* rather typo. Any way those buildings each time they fell displayed forced air into the under infrastructure any of the buildings that didn't require that steel support didn't fall. Some times older is better. The others were simply to far a way; the heat displaced into ground, concrete and earth. As far as 7 being demolished or any of the other buildings controlled demolition works upward first the building hangs then gives you will see in 7 the center gives then caves inward.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
You'll notice in 7 that it had a center structure that supported the whole building. When it either softened or was burnt through you see it clearly give it up. It sunk the building crumbled in on itself. While plausible that some state buildings in some 1960s paranoid operation could have been wired so they wouldn't be captured by then the Soviets. That wasn't the case example Bush calling in some order to evacuate then they blew building there were no signs of controlled demolition.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
As far as thermite people acting like nutters about it. As I stated earlier an old deck of Play Cards will detect as C4. I have ignited thermite before believe me there would be o non ignited thermite left just evidence it burned. If there was any demolition for real the evidence with be all over NY Harbor even let alone near ground zero. The conspiracy was afterward covering up for Bush. What we had was one beyond dumb Pres. and a smart terrorist his Dad help create.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
that doesnt make sense. jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to burn through construction grade steel, and if the pancake story was true, the steel core would still be standing to this day. the only thing that would send the core down is something that does burn hot enough to go through it. not to mention the dozens of reports and interviews of people saying they heard multiple explosions before and during the collapse and the pops that can be seen on film if u slow down the collapse
grimmunkey 2 years ago
I agree that Rudy was warned he said he was and we all know that. If you're trying to say people in the know tipped him off that is not the case. If you remember there was one or two structural engineers in the building went to to check the damage. When he got up to the point of damage he realized he was walking talking dead. Matter a fact he knew he wasn't getting out he was a hero in the fact his warning saved more lives at the cost of his own.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
I never said open air jet fuel melts steal. It can and well soften it and that is just what it did. Even Dr. Mitchio Kaku will tell you you can repeat the same experiment in your own home over "soften steel" not melt. The inferno was under ground acting like a blast furnace heating those beams bottom to top they lost their temper and gave up. It wasn't hardened steel any more the skeleton was done. Like a wishbone in vinegar trying to hold all that weight.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
Those pops mean nothing if you look at the clips you showed me in the demolition they weren't pops their were pieces being blown free. Those were caused by heated concrete popping, and pockets of gas used for fuel in the building lets not forget their was natural gas in the building. I can tell you never been camping and made a fire pit. try using moist rocks once you'll get a popping effect too. Your conspiracy in not their it's Haliburton that is where the real on was.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
as for 7,
watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
watch?v=5akpnIFK-RM
and what about the fact that news outlets were reporting collapses BEFORE they actually happened? the fact that the towers were built specifically to withstand a hit from a plane? the fact that Guiliani has been interviewed saying he was told the towers were goin to collapse? there is simply too much evidence against the official story. there's evidence that the CIA trained the pilots of the planes. i could go on and on and on
grimmunkey 2 years ago
The first clip you mention only demonstrates what I had said. You see the center support sink in and give up. On controlled demolition right side photo you'll see the unmistakable signs of demolition note only on the right the plume is blowing upward as in controlled demolition. On the left building 7 no explosive plumes the center support just gave up. The 2nd shows 7 sinking, because the center that supported it gave up after that much heat it lost it's temper it turned nearly jelly.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
Your second clip about mid way you'll see the the storage tanks and ac structure in the very center sink in first. If there was any other point to the video about the command center being empty. I'd have got the fuck out of their too it was common sense. As far as the news reports their was Chaos and of course some of them jumped the gun. No different than Rather calling the Election for Gore and getting fired on that day idiot Bush Jr was elected. As far as the buildings vs. planes...
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
Yes you are right there were designed to handle the "IMPACT" of a plane they both did. They also were designed in the 60s and the second tower opens I think in 70. The reason they were designed to handle the impact was this isn't the first time our biggest building and been hit by a plane. The Empire State building took a hit by a plane before the Twins were built. It survived it of course, because it wasn't a modern plane loaded down with fuel.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
You said there is to much evidence it's a lot of hear say you mean. You watched a bit much Loose Change ok? You should stick with verifiable facts. CIA agents trained as terrorists comon that is as ludicrous as the Lone Gun Man theory. You sound reasonably intelligent so don't get dragged in to non-sense now. Any thing can be made to look bad. You're also forgetting all the 1000 of people that have to keep it a secret. You're nearly saying the moon landing didn't happen and no one told anyone.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
first off, ive never even seen loose change i did the research on my own. i dont think you're right in your thinking but u have a real reason for believing what u do and seem like youve seen or heard of most of the evidence, so ill just respectfully agree to disagree
grimmunkey 2 years ago
is ANYBODY going to comment on the evidence being put forth in THIS video, or are you going to debate about the theory in whole?
Don't get me wrong I encourage discussion and open minds, but why is nobody touching the contents of THIS video?
What caused that projectile to radically change its direction, trailing Smoke and/or Powdered concrete?
911Infowarrior 2 years ago
nano thermite
brucelee6790 1 year ago
yep, 911 inside job.
jcperez0426 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
don't be a dumb ass nutter if there was Thermite in those quantities you would see it flare and it would have cut the beams right in those areas and the building would have tipped right in those places. What happened was the steel lost it's temper softened not melted you can do the same in your oven at home. The steel was heated by fire and cooled by rushing air it fractured like a hot marble dropped in water. There only melted steel was under ground in the inferno below.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Building 7 fell because of the under ground inferno took out it's support in the center and it caved in on itself. The other buildings falling pumped enough air in to the inferno it cut through steel like an acetylene torch it is as simple as that. Demolition goes upward not downward so that is just as failed. The only thing that is flaming here is the homo that posted this video. He is an ass banger. there was no thermite. Did you know playing cards test positive for C4 comon get real.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
^^ Seriously, are they paying you for that shit?
Thermite has been positively identified in all WTC dust samples. The jig is up. It's time for the lies to stop and heads to roll.
vidmanx0 2 years ago 5
We didn't knock our own buildings down like I stated earlier there was no termite. Most of these idiots that believe every thing they hear has never seen thermite. You can get readings for C4 off a deck of bicycle playing cards. The only conspiracy there was is the fact that Bush didn't want Osama because then the war on terror stops. that and Abuigraib &n Cheney Haliburton which he is under indictment for. No Osama hasn't paid the price yet Bush wanted him to retire like Castro.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
don't be a dumb ass nutter if there was Thermite in those quantities you would see it flare and it would have cut the beams right in those areas and the building would have tipped right in those places. What happened was the steel lost it's temper softened not melted you can do the same in your oven at home. The steel was heated by fire and cooled by rushing air it fractured like a hot marble dropped in water. There only melted steel was under ground in the inferno below.
HunkyMunky007 2 years ago
blast squib alert at the bottom on 1:36
isreal423 2 years ago 7
I am speechless... And that doesn't happen too often.
I blame Florida.
RuffleTheTeacher 2 years ago 2