@Ram256PL No thanks, GTX 550 is better then a radeon hd 4670 iceq isn't it? Dude i have a 1280x1024 monitor, i don't really need anything super amazing to max out something on this screen :P
@HQVideoTutorials OK I understand you. Yes it is slightly better than 4670 but it is much worse than my 4870. I think it is similar to 4770. Generally ATI cards are more powerful than Nvidia's.
I think it would be nice if someone makes an avatar-like map with CryEngine 2. Yep, 2, not three. I know it would be extremely hard but it's absolutely possible. It would be amazing!!
@glyoxal They just announced the release of mod tools for Cryengine 3. Wait and see, it might actually be somewhat good. Cryengine 2 isn't as efficient as the new Crytek engine so making a decision without knowing all the facts, its a little too early in my book at least.
@Seirra54 : It is a fact that cryengine 2 is way better than 3. anybody who played both games on pc at max settings will say the same thing. Crysis came with a cryengine 2 editor in itself. So its no big deal!
@glyoxal Im just saying, wait until you can mess with the settings and edit them with the editor. It was ported to consoles, just give it a chance lol.
Even I make 1080p videos of games and my computer is shit, I can only run Crysis on very high and no AA...
Seriously, if you're going to go to the trouble of uploading a video named 'Photo-realistic map', you could at least make it 1080p so we can 'see' the photo-realism...
@glyoxal Actually... I think it did? I don't think it was until Q4 of 08 though. So either way, you're probably still right. (But the quality is garbage, redo the video so we can watch it! :p)
@l33tfatlard I wanted to know if my computer would be able to handle this game XD PS: to all the others who replied to me, I stopped wanting the 16GB Of RAM a week and a half ago, till won't have enough money for dual graphics cards though :(
The 8800GT Alpha Dog edition is about 4 years old now, It was only £150 when I got it and it runs games faster than most current GPUs of the same price. Plus it has directx10 and runs crysis and every new game very well, there's no need to upgrade like people seem to say there is, as one graphics card will last for a few years. Just like the original xbox lasted for 3 years before it became obsolete.
I have all the consals and a great gameing pc and I will say this pc is way better at games I only use my ps3 for the blueray any more but might get blueray on my pc two lol
man this reminds me i really need to build a new system. at least upgrade 4870x2, but a new system would be better as my HDD and mobo are getting long in the tooth
It's funny to see people spending over 5k on monster desktops when I can run Crysis just fine @ Very High settings with my custom config. Looks more realistic than ever, must see to believe. Check my channel.
@KazzoKiller3890 Dude its actually quite hard to because FRAPS pretty much owns your computers FPS so if we record we lower our resolution and that means we raise our FPS. Like my computer
AMD Phenom 2.3ghz tri-core toliman
4gb of ddr2 of low latency ram clocked at 900mhz
1x EVGA 512mb nVidia Geforce 8800gt (no oc yet)
With a native resolution of 1920x1200 compared to 1080p which is 1920x1080
Mind you it is no $5000 computer yet few are I get high fps on all my games except crysis.70fps
@KazzoKiller3890 usually on all other games (Just Cause 2, Fallout 3, COJ2, Spore, Battlefield 2,etc.) crysis is a very graphics and power demanding game. So when you ask why cant we make it 1080p well you just got an explanation. P.S. im usually at 1600x900 which is VERY close to 1080p.
@KazzoKiller3890 i have a 500 dollar computer (didnt even build it, got it frim ibuypower (via newegg) and added a ATI HD 5770 OC to 910 mhz and 1300 mhz and i get 40 fps on all high on 1280*1024 :P
@DieTenkaichiMeister The 9600 is about the same as the 8800 and the 9800 is better then the 8800 yet your better off buying a 260 or waiting a little while for the prices to drop since the new 400 series just came out the 200 series prices should drop
I tried k-meleon, but it's basically firefox stripped down, still good for a low end pc.
I'd definately recommend firefox, because it supports addons that are just as cross platform as firefox itself. It's the addons that make firefox slow and heavy, but they also give you stuff like WORKING adblocking, full security, easy downloading, p2p in browser, 3D browsing, themes that can basically change the appearence of firefox in any way.
£658.00 in.vat AMD Phenom™ II X4 955 Quad-Core CPU w/ HyperTransport Technology Coolermaster Hyper TX3 CPU Cooling Fan MSI 770-G45 AM3 770 Chipset CrossFireX Support DDR3 4GB (2x2GB) PC12800 DDR3/1600mhz 500GB SATA-II 3.0Gb/s 16MB Cache HDD ATI Radeon HD 5770 PCI-E 16X 1GB DDR5 Video Card Onboard 7.1 Audio 700W Powersupply CoolerMaster Elite 310 Mid Tower Gaming Case Windows 7 Home Premium ill buy another hd5770 later on, im working for it, im 15, SO happy XD
That's not too bad. It's still very expensive, especially for something that can really only be used for gaming. But at least it's not out of this world.
Ooh, im really sorry man, the first reply was directed towards TheCrysis95 :P, and i quick read your reply and thought it was TheCrysis95 that wrote that ^^...
The best PC to run Crysis? Money no concern? Intel CoreI7 975 water cooled. Overclock to 4.5GHZ + 6GB triple channel DDR3 2000 and 2 X ATI 5870 in CrossFire, water cooled and overclocked. Add a couple of SSD drive in RAID strip for lightning fast loading and you are all set.
For th ill informed, the Nvidia Fermi based GT300 will not be available for at least another 6 to 8 months at best and when it come, will cost a fortune and run hot has hell... Forget Nvidia for the foreseeable future.
I'm buying a PC with these specs: Intel Core i7 920 OC'd to 3800MHZ, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 2x GTX 295's in Quad Sli and it still won't be enough to get 60FPS on this damn game, will it? £2000 this will cost me.
And what are you implying? A console can? If so you are the tackiest fanboy i have ever come across, and believe me, i've come across MANY.
If GTA4 can't even play at 30fps at 640p no AA on the PS3 with it's meager 256mb VRAM, then Crysis has absolutely no chance whatsoever on the PS3, or any console for that matter.
Crysis has no chance on console? Lol, am I the only one who has seen the gameplay footage or something? There are 3 screens, PC, PS3 and the XBOX 360, and believe me, the difference is not huge! The only thing I noticed was that some of the lighting on the PC version was alot more vibrant, other than that, nothing much else.
No, really. The lighting effects have improved much, aswell as character models, and overall the city looks very realistic. It's just some mishaps Crytek did on the PC side of things - blurry textures, short view distance - that make it look like worse.
But of course there are some scenes in Crysis that look better than most scenes in Crysis 2, but so there are scenes in Crysis 2 that look better than most scenes in Crysis.
It's just physics and destructability - nonexistent in 2.
@Daputti Lighting models in crysis was much more realistic...same too for character models. Ans most importantle crysis had high-res textures since it was pc exclusive unlike low-res textures of crysis 2.
I'm bitter for Crytek selling out on consoles, but I'm being a realist here.
Lens flare.
More even ambient occlusion and HDR.
The terrific shaders, such as the orange alarm light in the beginning of the game
All those things contribute to Crysis 2' better lighting. Sure the textures still suck, but the lighting matters more on the overall scheme of things. The character models I was talking about we're mostly the aliens, and the key characters' facial animations.
@Daputti nope. The cryengine 2 never released its full potential and so the new cryengine 3. It's a matter of what system these games were meant for, not the engines themselves. And since Crysis 2 it's a multiplatform...i'd call it a maximum port. Not a real pc game. Crysis was. Geez, to think a good pc is more cenvenient than a console...
@glyoxal For crysis 2 ON PC i have to disagree with you completely, theres a whole new engine and shits going to be intense, just not as much so on console. i do agree with you that crysis 2 for console will be the same or less than crysis graphics
@KingofTownz most probably because of those stupid 5yr old consoles!! just imagine each year ur having tons of new graphics cards, each one better than the previous. Whereas the consoles are 4-5 years old. Theoretically latest pc hardware are miles ahead of consoles. So how can u assume a game to be grpahically(and physics) top-notch if it's going to run on consoles at the same time?
@glyoxal hopefully they will make the pc and console game separately so they are both able to max out the hardware, but i kind of doubt that as game designers seem to be determined to pump out low quality games just to get quicker profits, not thinking of the gamers getting bad story-lines, bugs, bad controls and console graphics on pc's capable of many times better. Crytech did very well with Crysis 1, i hope they haven't forgotten about us pc gamers in their quest for the mainstream.
@glyoxal you do this by understanding pc's can change their settings, and that consoles are usually locked at a certain quality. Then again, consoles are the reason games are so slowly moving up in visual quality.
Wow photorealism! in 360p...
tomce4909 5 months ago 8
@tomce4909 get a brain stupid.
Jaeger2011 5 months ago
@Jaeger2011 screw you mr. smartass
tomce4909 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice one :D liked. check out my vid where i test my GTX580 on ultra settings with mods on crysis. link: /watch?v=UOdcUIvgsXk
ExProsiveGaming 6 months ago
@Caseyds620 The original Crysis is actually more demanding than Crysis 2 from what I heard.
wwyk1993 6 months ago
would it run on my computer?
Video CArd:ZOTAC 512 MB DDR3 Nvidia geforce 9800 GT
Proccessor:AMD phenom X4 9750 QUAD core
RAM:4 GB of DDR3 RAm
Power supply:500 WATTS
mstrx21 6 months ago
@mstrx21 probably on med/low
mrapter7 6 months ago
@mrapter7 I actually got it and it can run on ultra high but with some lag.
mstrx21 6 months ago
@mstrx21 damn, then thats your beast of a processor kicking in.
mrapter7 6 months ago
@mstrx21 it will run on highrofl
SuperFunnier 6 months ago
@mstrx21 it should probably on medium but hey if u want recommended settings go check on steam it should tell u near the bottom of the page
thatfunnyguy122 6 months ago
@thatfunnyguy122 it run on ultra high evrything,But of course,it lags,but its playable
mstrx21 6 months ago
The shadows still look crappy.
patrolmostwanted 6 months ago
How would this game run completely maxed out at a 1280x1024 resolution?
EVGA GTX 550 TI (Fermi) 1GB
AMD Phenom II X4 B50 3.2GHz Processor
4GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit Operating System
ASUS M4N68T-M-V2 Motherboard
HQVideoTutorials 7 months ago
@HQVideoTutorials 550 is crappy card. U'd better buy an 560 or 580
Ram256PL 6 months ago
@Ram256PL No thanks, GTX 550 is better then a radeon hd 4670 iceq isn't it? Dude i have a 1280x1024 monitor, i don't really need anything super amazing to max out something on this screen :P
HQVideoTutorials 6 months ago
@HQVideoTutorials OK I understand you. Yes it is slightly better than 4670 but it is much worse than my 4870. I think it is similar to 4770. Generally ATI cards are more powerful than Nvidia's.
Ram256PL 6 months ago
@Ram256PL 580 > 6970. Nuff said.
wwyk1993 6 months ago
@Ram256PL Not really , GTX580 > HD6970 , GTX570 > HD6950 , GTX560ti > HD6870..
jasontvnd 5 months ago 4
@jasontvnd are you kidding? 6870 is more powerful than shitty 560Ti
Ram256PL 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey guys, Check these vids out.!!! 100% WORKING , NO SURVEY , Download links for :
Crysis 2 : youtube.com/watch?v=uJbTR03RYY Y
Brink : youtube.com/watch?v=89l1LEtj2R g
CoD Black Ops : youtube.com/watch?v=7p_Yy76-uw A
WORKS... NO SURVEYS GUARANTEED!!!
Full version....
Thevb2101 8 months ago
drawing-realistic youtube makes these awesome settings suck :(
sisisspore 8 months ago
photorealistic, in 360p
martysmartylol 9 months ago
@Themoviewatcher96 who says?
glyoxal 9 months ago
I think it would be nice if someone makes an avatar-like map with CryEngine 2. Yep, 2, not three. I know it would be extremely hard but it's absolutely possible. It would be amazing!!
Cigaraholic 9 months ago
@Cigaraholic :cryengine3 goes down the drain..atleast when compared to cryengine2
glyoxal 9 months ago
@glyoxal They just announced the release of mod tools for Cryengine 3. Wait and see, it might actually be somewhat good. Cryengine 2 isn't as efficient as the new Crytek engine so making a decision without knowing all the facts, its a little too early in my book at least.
Seirra54 9 months ago
@Seirra54 : It is a fact that cryengine 2 is way better than 3. anybody who played both games on pc at max settings will say the same thing. Crysis came with a cryengine 2 editor in itself. So its no big deal!
glyoxal 9 months ago
@glyoxal Im just saying, wait until you can mess with the settings and edit them with the editor. It was ported to consoles, just give it a chance lol.
Seirra54 9 months ago
you can turn anti-aliasing off because you can only hardly see it on the monitor with HDMI. Not to mention youtube.
4232267 9 months ago
What the **** You with All High and an 8800GT don't lag, me with a 9800 GT lag? (just in few maps) All Hight, 1680x1050
RedhotIta1 10 months ago
@RedhotIta1
1680x1050 is a higher res and your other specs such as processor can affect the performance. the 8800gt was one of the best cards at it's time.
legendp2011 9 months ago
RUENSKAEP HAV BETR GRAPIKZ DEN DIS CRAP
iHitAnElephant 10 months ago
very... lagistic
realflow100 10 months ago
lol uncharted music
jonasman176 11 months ago
Even I make 1080p videos of games and my computer is shit, I can only run Crysis on very high and no AA...
Seriously, if you're going to go to the trouble of uploading a video named 'Photo-realistic map', you could at least make it 1080p so we can 'see' the photo-realism...
prokentsful 1 year ago
@prokentsful : think before commenting.. this video is two and half years old. youtube had no hd support at that time
glyoxal 1 year ago 103
@glyoxal
i think it wouldn't really matter. back then you could still upload videos that are in 1080p but the video wont actually display it.
afsan23 11 months ago
@glyoxal Actually... I think it did? I don't think it was until Q4 of 08 though. So either way, you're probably still right. (But the quality is garbage, redo the video so we can watch it! :p)
loftenchag 10 months ago
@glyoxal I DONT THINK BF 3 WAS COMEING OUT AT THAT TIME!
DaltonRay360 5 months ago
@glyoxal HD support came out at the end of 2007
XxAdeliOxX 5 months ago
@XxAdeliOxX Taken from Wikipedia: "In November 2008, 720p HD support was added..."
bladefinor 4 months ago
@bladefinor November ... Look at the date my friend.
JoostRevo 4 months ago
@JoostRevo I know... I just corrected what glyoxal's said. It didn't come out in the end of 2007, but in the end of 2008.
bladefinor 4 months ago
@bladefinor Oh, Didnt see that comment. lol, sorry
JoostRevo 4 months ago
@JoostRevo It's okay lol. Btw, I meant Adelis' comment, not glyoxal.
bladefinor 4 months ago
@bladefinor thats weird coz there a videos uploaded in 2007 with HD :\
XxAdeliOxX 4 months ago
@prokentsful fail
saladwithsalad 11 months ago
@prokentsful owned
playsbba018 11 months ago
CRYENGINE!
Exist64 1 year ago
@Penquis100 I have $1500 computer costs a total of ~$1310 I'm getting either a 6870 or the $650 5970 XD
xXFR05TXx 1 year ago
@l33tfatlard I wanted to know if my computer would be able to handle this game XD PS: to all the others who replied to me, I stopped wanting the 16GB Of RAM a week and a half ago, till won't have enough money for dual graphics cards though :(
xXFR05TXx 1 year ago
i'm getting a new computer, 16Gb RAM, Radeon HD 6870, i5 3.44 GHz processor... will this be good?
(price: $1682.85) (building it myself)
xXFR05TXx 1 year ago
@xXFR05TXx that's too much RAM, forcus on a better graphics card, maybe 2x 6870's
SigmaLanceLeader 1 year ago 13
@xXFR05TXx Get Nvidia graphics cards. Nvidia is better than ATI right now. May change in the future.
ilikemonkeysss 1 year ago
@xXFR05TXx 16gbs of ram is retarded. Cut that in half or in 1/3 and crossfire 6870s or get a better cpu.
uhohpolio 1 year ago
@xXFR05TXx If you'r having this kind of money i suggest to buy a 5970 or a 5870.
Penquis100 1 year ago
The 8800GT Alpha Dog edition is about 4 years old now, It was only £150 when I got it and it runs games faster than most current GPUs of the same price. Plus it has directx10 and runs crysis and every new game very well, there's no need to upgrade like people seem to say there is, as one graphics card will last for a few years. Just like the original xbox lasted for 3 years before it became obsolete.
briggun22 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
whats better hd4670 1gb gddr3 or hd5670 1gb gddr5?
marfg12345 1 year ago
I have all the consals and a great gameing pc and I will say this pc is way better at games I only use my ps3 for the blueray any more but might get blueray on my pc two lol
chrismcdonald16602 1 year ago
@chrismcdonald16602 same ps3 blu ray ftw.
SAM16MM 1 year ago
how differences between 9800gt and this?
Coptersa007 1 year ago
Lol hehe I have a new computer and I had to try this game out, I can play on full graphics and with Vsync without any problem
Karlskogasstolthet 1 year ago
download link ???
masterchief0611 1 year ago
@aramonadroj i have 2 SLI sistem nvidia 9600gs
TheCrysis95 1 year ago
I bet it looks good on your pc but the vid on youtube looks like poo lol. HD next time plz
crazytime666 1 year ago
Faking lucker
Raond11 1 year ago
as much as i like crysis, i was dissapointed in the AI.
they could have made the AI like F.E.A.R. , honestly.
but apart from that the game is great, all though you dont focus on the story much, you focus on the graphics lol
DJCRISIS111 1 year ago
man this reminds me i really need to build a new system. at least upgrade 4870x2, but a new system would be better as my HDD and mobo are getting long in the tooth
grapes008 1 year ago
can someone please tell me what the settings are in-game?
Low
Medium
Gamer
Enthusiast
or something, right?
prinny081 1 year ago
I would get lost in that forest, lol
hiws1 1 year ago
lol...that isnt HD
silverfearn 1 year ago
not very photo realistic with ur shit quality vid
F3ARL3SSJ 1 year ago
It's funny to see people spending over 5k on monster desktops when I can run Crysis just fine @ Very High settings with my custom config. Looks more realistic than ever, must see to believe. Check my channel.
AndrosForever 1 year ago
i am only watching for the graphics so wots the point in only showing a 480p video???!!!
TC19920 1 year ago
are you telling me these people can afford 5000 dollar computers but cant make the video 1080p?
KazzoKiller3890 1 year ago 97
LOL
iCurryz 1 year ago
money doesn't mean they won't be lazy :P
GamerJamer 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 Youtube barely had HQ two years ago
RcAntax 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 Nerds these days are sad. Spending 5000 dollars on an alienware and then putting limewire on it.
Notespompon 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 sigh even if u watch it it 1080p its not as good as playing it
(graphic wise)
thespartenkid 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 Dude its actually quite hard to because FRAPS pretty much owns your computers FPS so if we record we lower our resolution and that means we raise our FPS. Like my computer
AMD Phenom 2.3ghz tri-core toliman
4gb of ddr2 of low latency ram clocked at 900mhz
1x EVGA 512mb nVidia Geforce 8800gt (no oc yet)
With a native resolution of 1920x1200 compared to 1080p which is 1920x1080
Mind you it is no $5000 computer yet few are I get high fps on all my games except crysis.70fps
StainedValentineBand 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 usually on all other games (Just Cause 2, Fallout 3, COJ2, Spore, Battlefield 2,etc.) crysis is a very graphics and power demanding game. So when you ask why cant we make it 1080p well you just got an explanation. P.S. im usually at 1600x900 which is VERY close to 1080p.
StainedValentineBand 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 This was uploaded in 2008, thus the 360p xD
vacantclassroom 1 year ago
@vacantclassroom ah okay that makes sense
KazzoKiller3890 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 possibly due to time taken to upload the vid bcuse of the file size
shuffleharddance 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 this can be made by 3d max or anything.
MultiJacob123 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 1080p/720p/360p is what resolution you film in, this perso hasn't filmed in a resolution that supports HD...
Raptorhide 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890 i have a 500 dollar computer (didnt even build it, got it frim ibuypower (via newegg) and added a ATI HD 5770 OC to 910 mhz and 1300 mhz and i get 40 fps on all high on 1280*1024 :P
mrapter7 1 year ago
@mrapter7 Same with me only of DinoPC for £740
VeyronBD 10 months ago
@KazzoKiller3890 In 2008 there is no 1080pixels nor 720pixels the limit to upload a video in 2008 was just 100mb or something like that.
VegTutor 1 year ago
@KazzoKiller3890
If you look at this persons specs at the time of recording he'd be lucky to get anything beyond 640x480 resolution.
Wakkajakka 1 year ago
@Wakkajakka yea that was my mistake and sorry to the uplaoder of this video
KazzoKiller3890 1 year ago
the geforce 9400 uses the geforce 8400 gpu.
PsilocybinDream 1 year ago
i was use a 8800ultra
now i use GTX260
GTX260 is more more faster.
RIHTEOUS 1 year ago
Is the 8800 so much bettah then the 9400? I cant play it on high without lag :(
DieTenkaichiMeister 1 year ago
@DieTenkaichiMeister The 9600 is about the same as the 8800 and the 9800 is better then the 8800 yet your better off buying a 260 or waiting a little while for the prices to drop since the new 400 series just came out the 200 series prices should drop
trignite 1 year ago
I tried k-meleon, but it's basically firefox stripped down, still good for a low end pc.
I'd definately recommend firefox, because it supports addons that are just as cross platform as firefox itself. It's the addons that make firefox slow and heavy, but they also give you stuff like WORKING adblocking, full security, easy downloading, p2p in browser, 3D browsing, themes that can basically change the appearence of firefox in any way.
nofashionvideos 1 year ago
£658.00 in.vat AMD Phenom™ II X4 955 Quad-Core CPU w/ HyperTransport Technology Coolermaster Hyper TX3 CPU Cooling Fan MSI 770-G45 AM3 770 Chipset CrossFireX Support DDR3 4GB (2x2GB) PC12800 DDR3/1600mhz 500GB SATA-II 3.0Gb/s 16MB Cache HDD ATI Radeon HD 5770 PCI-E 16X 1GB DDR5 Video Card Onboard 7.1 Audio 700W Powersupply CoolerMaster Elite 310 Mid Tower Gaming Case Windows 7 Home Premium ill buy another hd5770 later on, im working for it, im 15, SO happy XD
yuriperiotto 1 year ago
is this the video where i post the price of my pc and tell everyone how good it is???
so:
my pc cost 350€ and it runs the INternet Explorer perfectly!
but honestly.... who cares about your PCs?
STR4P4Zi3 2 years ago 2
n00b get firefox.
dylanroo 2 years ago
i dont even use internet explorer...i use safari... i dont like firefox, chrome and the internet explorer
STR4P4Zi3 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i bought my pc from nasa it costed 4599£ and i can have all games and i poon ur comps
kentbelly 2 years ago
4599 pounds damn your crazy
dushikorsou1 2 years ago 3
My gaming pc was £1200... and crysis plays beautifully!
EvilLamas 2 years ago
@EvilLamas
specs?
quasarvega 2 years ago
My gaming pc was £650... and crysis plays amazingly!
Akoni411 2 years ago
Jurassic Park game or Dino Crisis using this engine would be sweet
porkinmycorkhole 2 years ago 8
as this level of crysis gets called?
nnnaaannnooo9 2 years ago
U call that photo realistic LOL . u havn't Applied da patch .YAK
834073 2 years ago
i think you need minimum 1500€
unbee73 2 years ago
I'm building an xmas build with core i5/hd4870/4gb ram
Cost? 681 euro ^.^
FenixSync 2 years ago
Anything by Intel is a rip-off. The hyper-threading capabilities that you're paying extra for is definitely not worth it.
KeyAttendant 2 years ago
its a good pc that you have or going to bulid but i think an Nvidia GF gt260 or somthing like that would be better
HelperWindows 2 years ago
how much does it cost for a rig like this?
CrazyycclowN 2 years ago
this is all old stuff so not very much
MentalSentinel 2 years ago
i would say you get a good computer , especially dirext 10 , because of the new dirext 11,for under 500 euros!that´s like 700-800 dollars.
ForsakenProt 2 years ago
That's not too bad. It's still very expensive, especially for something that can really only be used for gaming. But at least it's not out of this world.
CrazyycclowN 2 years ago
You can probably build a rig like this for around $500 with screen.
dreampilot2 2 years ago 4
Well you got to assemble it yourself and pirate Windows. Not recommended...
gaming PC's should always go $800 and up.
Daputti 2 years ago
Well actually I already have a copy of Windows Vista Ultimate and Vista, but I wasn't thinking about the other people. :P
dreampilot2 2 years ago
Crysis goregous graphics but shitty gameplay..thats the harsh truth
7StringFury 2 years ago
amazing gamplay, wut r u talking about?
DeadRiverProductions 2 years ago
what? the gameplay is awesome!
Louis390 2 years ago
Not shitty gameplay, but not on equal terms to graphics, compared to other games.
CrazyycclowN 2 years ago
800 x 600 ?
Twys18 2 years ago
dude my 260 gts lags on very high and thats bull lol wtf did u over clock?
kylebond29 2 years ago
@kylebond29 Crappy proccesser amirite?
trignite 2 years ago
this vid makes my shit lap top lag lol
MrFlowmingo 2 years ago
Lmao
Bearmonkey12345 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheCrysis95 2 years ago
No, ya don't ^^
SAiKoU88 2 years ago 4
@SAiKoU88
Well, its a beast in Uzbekistan or whatever you might come from if you think that is a beast :P
/sarcasm off
FrostbornX 2 years ago
Huh? I'm not from Uzbekistan, fucktard..
SAiKoU88 2 years ago
@SAiKoU88
Pick up a dictionary, and look up SARCASM
fucktard
FrostbornX 2 years ago
No one ever told you that sarcasm on the net is fail?
I only wrote "No, ya don't" and you start ranting about how something is a beast in Uzbek..
SAiKoU88 2 years ago
@SAiKoU88
Ooh, im really sorry man, the first reply was directed towards TheCrysis95 :P, and i quick read your reply and thought it was TheCrysis95 that wrote that ^^...
.sorry little dude ^^
FrostbornX 2 years ago
mhmmm suree i like how bad you are ar lying
Gin132456 2 years ago
wie kann man mit dieser grafikarte crysis auf ultra high spielen?? das geht doch garnicht
how to play with this Graphic card crysis on ultra high? I've got a GTS250 but crysis on ultra high laggs
NIGHTMAREROBO 2 years ago
lol the specs u just said are mega shit as if u get that fps looool.
killerz102 2 years ago
U have got a mouse.
glyoxal 2 years ago 18
@glyoxal Lol yea i agree mine is much better And isnt considered a monster
XAutomatedOwnerX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@glyoxal Lol yea i agree mine is much better and it cant even run crysis on 120 fps i really want it to do that.
XAutomatedOwnerX 1 year ago
@glyoxal u haz no mouse.
chris13295 1 year ago
@TheCrysis95 what are you smoking?
UnrealLord 1 year ago
@TheCrysis95 I had like that on my laptop..
Loche1337 1 year ago
@TheCrysis95
i have a monster
intel core i7 920 OC
6 gb ddr3 1800mhz RAM
two ati hd 5850 1 gb
1 tb 7200 rpm
windows 7 home premium 64 bit
mother board asus rampage 2 extreme with his audio board
, it's impossible that you can play at 120 fps with a sucking 9600gt at ultra high. Your computer suck. Mine is a gaming rig ;)
alfa405 1 year ago
@TheCrysis95 Thats a noob pc? lol even 7 months ago where you posted it that was a bad pc.
TheXordinary 1 year ago
@TheCrysis95 LMFAO
LIE!
i have the 9800++ AKA the GTS 250
it is two serise better then yours
and when ran crysis on high, i get 6 FPS
AppleKidzTechTak 1 year ago
@AppleKidzTechTak on SLI sistem?because i use sli
TheCrysis95 1 year ago
id get a better gpu
TiTToBeatz 2 years ago
Nice setup man ! Check out my Sli rig videos :)
TylerTron21 2 years ago
i suggest there's no need to say your system spec~ cos its nth new~ :D
i have better specs than yours~ :D
zomgbbqwth 2 years ago
Yay, no shitty music! It's a bit hard to notice the photo realistic graphics when the youtube quality it so low, learn to HD please. :)
Arycama 2 years ago 4
Nice build.
vegauaf 2 years ago
The best PC to run Crysis? Money no concern? Intel CoreI7 975 water cooled. Overclock to 4.5GHZ + 6GB triple channel DDR3 2000 and 2 X ATI 5870 in CrossFire, water cooled and overclocked. Add a couple of SSD drive in RAID strip for lightning fast loading and you are all set.
For th ill informed, the Nvidia Fermi based GT300 will not be available for at least another 6 to 8 months at best and when it come, will cost a fortune and run hot has hell... Forget Nvidia for the foreseeable future.
UTUBESUCK666 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
No argument here ;)
zodiac949 2 years ago
What is the best type PC that could run this game with the upmost amazing graphics? Also, how much would it cost? please respond!
Labam93 2 years ago
that pc wil run crysys overall with high settings 8x aa with a e6750 and a gigabyte p35 mobo
@ 35/40pfs
pleite567 2 years ago
I'm buying a PC with these specs: Intel Core i7 920 OC'd to 3800MHZ, 6GB DDR3 RAM, 2x GTX 295's in Quad Sli and it still won't be enough to get 60FPS on this damn game, will it? £2000 this will cost me.
FuckingFurious 2 years ago
And what are you implying? A console can? If so you are the tackiest fanboy i have ever come across, and believe me, i've come across MANY.
If GTA4 can't even play at 30fps at 640p no AA on the PS3 with it's meager 256mb VRAM, then Crysis has absolutely no chance whatsoever on the PS3, or any console for that matter.
ILove2SpoogeOnU 2 years ago
Crysis has no chance on console? Lol, am I the only one who has seen the gameplay footage or something? There are 3 screens, PC, PS3 and the XBOX 360, and believe me, the difference is not huge! The only thing I noticed was that some of the lighting on the PC version was alot more vibrant, other than that, nothing much else.
FuckingFurious 2 years ago
Crysis 2 will be released for Ps3,X360 and PC as well. But both graphics and physics of crysis 2 will be no match for crysis.
glyoxal 2 years ago 3
I'm not buying into the next crysis on a console. As you said, Cryengine 3 looks terrible.
ILove2SpoogeOnU 2 years ago
@glyoxal
Crysis 2 will have better graphics, idiot. Just not on consoles.
Why the fuck would they nerf the PC version to the console level?
Daputti 1 year ago
@Daputti : Now since crysis 2 is out..i guess you understand who the idiot is.
glyoxal 9 months ago
@glyoxal
What? The graphics are better. The physics aren't.
Daputti 9 months ago
@Daputti : you must be out of your mind to say that!
glyoxal 9 months ago
@glyoxal
No, really. The lighting effects have improved much, aswell as character models, and overall the city looks very realistic. It's just some mishaps Crytek did on the PC side of things - blurry textures, short view distance - that make it look like worse.
But of course there are some scenes in Crysis that look better than most scenes in Crysis 2, but so there are scenes in Crysis 2 that look better than most scenes in Crysis.
It's just physics and destructability - nonexistent in 2.
Daputti 9 months ago
@Daputti Lighting models in crysis was much more realistic...same too for character models. Ans most importantle crysis had high-res textures since it was pc exclusive unlike low-res textures of crysis 2.
glyoxal 9 months ago
@glyoxal
I'm bitter for Crytek selling out on consoles, but I'm being a realist here.
Lens flare.
More even ambient occlusion and HDR.
The terrific shaders, such as the orange alarm light in the beginning of the game
All those things contribute to Crysis 2' better lighting. Sure the textures still suck, but the lighting matters more on the overall scheme of things. The character models I was talking about we're mostly the aliens, and the key characters' facial animations.
Daputti 9 months ago
@Daputti nope. The cryengine 2 never released its full potential and so the new cryengine 3. It's a matter of what system these games were meant for, not the engines themselves. And since Crysis 2 it's a multiplatform...i'd call it a maximum port. Not a real pc game. Crysis was. Geez, to think a good pc is more cenvenient than a console...
accountnumuno 9 months ago
@accountnumuno agree 100%
bloc22 9 months ago
@glyoxal For crysis 2 ON PC i have to disagree with you completely, theres a whole new engine and shits going to be intense, just not as much so on console. i do agree with you that crysis 2 for console will be the same or less than crysis graphics
c1h2a3d4b5e6e7m8a9n 1 year ago
@glyoxal Wait your saying the original crysis will have better graphics and physics than 2nd?
KingofTownz 1 year ago
@KingofTownz most probably because of those stupid 5yr old consoles!! just imagine each year ur having tons of new graphics cards, each one better than the previous. Whereas the consoles are 4-5 years old. Theoretically latest pc hardware are miles ahead of consoles. So how can u assume a game to be grpahically(and physics) top-notch if it's going to run on consoles at the same time?
glyoxal 1 year ago 40
@glyoxal hopefully they will make the pc and console game separately so they are both able to max out the hardware, but i kind of doubt that as game designers seem to be determined to pump out low quality games just to get quicker profits, not thinking of the gamers getting bad story-lines, bugs, bad controls and console graphics on pc's capable of many times better. Crytech did very well with Crysis 1, i hope they haven't forgotten about us pc gamers in their quest for the mainstream.
invisible0tom 1 year ago
@glyoxal you do this by understanding pc's can change their settings, and that consoles are usually locked at a certain quality. Then again, consoles are the reason games are so slowly moving up in visual quality.
chokeonitman 1 year ago
@glyoxal If they focused more on the graphics card than that 8-core 3.2 ghz cpu, all games could be much better
DenKulesteSomFins 1 year ago