Revolution 1 is the original version. It was recorded for the White album. John wanted it released as a single but EMI said no because it was too long for airplay at that time. Almost all songs on the radio in the 1960's were between 2 - 3 minutes long. So the Beatles went back into the studio and recorded the single version. Because John was a little pissed off, they recorded the new version with a faster tempo, distorted guitars, and angrier vocals. The chords are the same.
@drumdog024 Actually, you are wrong. In fact, the flip side of the single "revolution" was Hey Jude".. which was 7 mins long...and went on to be the biggest selling single ever released by the Beatles...while you are right about this being the original version, It was never intended to be a single release. Your claim about it being too long is just what you heard, but at that point, nobody told the Beatles what they could, or couldnt release as a single.
Paul is playing his original '61 Hofner bass there. (well, they were all pretending to play, only the singing was live in the original fast Revolution video) Read Beatles Gear by Andy Babiuk. He explains it all!
In my opinion, Paul McCartney is like the greatest bass player ever. Since he's he went out on his own, he's been a twink, but he plays that bass more badass than I've ever heard in my 56 years.
freakin' hot bootleg,ty............also, 1 of my fav Lennon lines was always @ 1:17 John says "when you talk about detruction, don't you know that you can count me out (in)"@ 1:26
@sirwob I heard from his own lops he meant he wants a non violent revilution like Egypt,but if if comes to violence who can gaurantee their actions,I can't
Say guys, all I'm hearing here is the 2009 remaster of the the song's White Album version, plus a sample from a segue between two songs from the LOVE album played over and over.
That segue obviously used for the sample herein was made out of a horn piece from the outro of "Strawberry Fields forever", maybe some strings, and some John/Paul/George vocals going "AAAHHHHH" electronically processed for LOVE to match the higher key of the horn and string stuff in the background.
& towards the end there's also some of the backwards guitar from "I'm only sleeping" & some John mumbling & groaning from "Revolution #9". Can't tell where the mock high-pitched "la-la" is from, though.
But I agree...overall, it sounds even better than the original album version. Too bad Paul's "Honey pie" wouldn't have matched as a follow-up anymore, the end of this version woulda been great to directly cut into George Martin and that studio engineer talking at the start of "Revolution #9".
Who are you kidding? This "video" is just stills from the White album sessions interspersed with footage from the David Frost show (in which they played the fast version of Revolution.) Nothing new here.
Katmak21... the video you created for it is really well done! Although it may not seem like much, I liked how Ringo smiles at 2:37 as they sing "it's gonna be alright..."
Really good job and thanks for posting this. - Mike
The Fast Revolution has the same lyrics as the White Album (slow) version. Same song, different tempo. I have never cared which one got recorded first. I don't consider one or the other the "original." They recorded two versions because, what I read, John wanted to play it slower. Paul and George wanted to rock it up.
No, the original Revolution single was released as a B-side to Hey Jude on August 1968 earlier than Revolution 1 which came out in Nov. '68, but you are right that it technically is the original since it was recorded first, but Revolution was much faster and had different lyrics than Revolution 1.
he means that this version was recorded 1st, so technically this IS the original. In fact this was the first song recorded for the White album sessions. May 68 I think.
Dude I've been wanting to hear this version FOREVER! It doesn't suck, the guys are just jamming out. If you're a musician you should know what that feels like! I do and it's out of this freakin' world.
@MattHatter Ive been there your tired , and the music comes from deep inside you , making it more original , more edgier, I personally love anything these chaps set to tape , . . . audio as well video,
that kid at :27 with george martin is a very young geoff emerick who helped with the beatles recording experimentations,he quit during the making of the''white album'' because of the friction going on between the beatles.
In this vid you can see the first Höfner bass from Hamburg...it remained as a spare bass for years till the making of this vid...a pity it was stolen a few months later.
Concensus online among Beatles freaks is that the basic track could have been "embellished" using modern recording techniques/trickery etc. Admittedly, it does sound way ahead of its time in terms of the electronic wizardry. But the Fab Four were ahead of the game anyway. Whatever the opinion, it's an interesting and brilliant new version to the one we've grown to know and love on the White Album.
If the tracks were stolen out of the Dakaota, we all know who stole them .. hint his initials are F.S .. none the less .. This Is A Great FIND .. thank you John !
una version para verdaderos coleccionistas de corazon de los beatles con la musica de lennon que no deja de impresionar aun despues de muerto que seria si viviese, enseñandole a los rebeldes la rebeldia.
Why wasn't Lennon satisfied with this version? They could've put it on the White Album like this. I always had the feeling that those two separate tracks (°1 and °9) were the weakest ones on the album.
This track is just AMAZING!! Better than I could have hoped for. I thought it would be very segregated...first part I the song then part II experimental. That's still the running order, but it's way more of a melding.
The song here is essentially what with know with a few minor differences & overall looser feel, but part tow is a morphing that keeps some of the elements of the song's theme but moves into the experimental realm.
This REALLY should have been on "Anthology 3"!!!!!!!!
7 Dislikes? Ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow
bpanzullo1 1 day ago
aaaaamm shubi dubaa !!!
angelsashimy 3 weeks ago
I got the White Album bought new in 1968.
10131899 4 weeks ago
6 people used to like good music, but then they took an arrow to the knee
FREEEDOgaming 1 month ago 3
can't we just get the god damn session without all the intercutting?
goback3spaces 1 month ago
prefiero la otra vercion
20murguero 2 months ago
I like this GROOVY version. BEATLES will live on FOREVER !!!
Misshippychic1 3 months ago
Revolution 1 is the original version. It was recorded for the White album. John wanted it released as a single but EMI said no because it was too long for airplay at that time. Almost all songs on the radio in the 1960's were between 2 - 3 minutes long. So the Beatles went back into the studio and recorded the single version. Because John was a little pissed off, they recorded the new version with a faster tempo, distorted guitars, and angrier vocals. The chords are the same.
drumdog024 4 months ago
@drumdog024 Actually, you are wrong. In fact, the flip side of the single "revolution" was Hey Jude".. which was 7 mins long...and went on to be the biggest selling single ever released by the Beatles...while you are right about this being the original version, It was never intended to be a single release. Your claim about it being too long is just what you heard, but at that point, nobody told the Beatles what they could, or couldnt release as a single.
524pmdnyc 2 months ago
0:54 wtf
deedeebagee 5 months ago 2
My friends dad has the origanal white album....not even unwrapped.......its the special edition too
Beatleslegendsame 6 months ago
0:14 ...is that a doobie? ...hehe...
musicalmajician 6 months ago
"Take your knickers off and lets go." LOL!!
515742617000027 6 months ago
Paul presents his great dancing skill at 4:33
nice version anyway
britpopok 6 months ago
Love it!
mozartfx1 6 months ago
this isnt bad, its still good but the record album is clearly better
NotYourAverageJoe321 6 months ago
John at 0:39 looks like severius piton! LOL
MrBellamy96 6 months ago
For hidden messages in Beatles songs search Truth Contest, click on The Present, click on the Beatles section. Thumbs up on this comment.
michael777776 7 months ago
Paul is sooooo cute that I just want to touch His cheeks like He was small baby:)))
patoolkaxD 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are a devotee of 'sixties music, then check out the book 'A Pop Revolution, the transatlantic music scene, 1965 to 1969' by the invisible man.
karlvorderman 8 months ago
I would very happily see this version on White Album INSTEAD of no.1 and no.9. There would be enough space for Not Guilty!
gietek 8 months ago
...terrible? doesn't suck? friends, this version is The Beatles from inside!!! ;)
pajaroloqo 8 months ago 9
@pajaroloqo don't worry man, peopel 're stupid :/
JoeMontesinos 1 month ago
at the start it sounds normal.in the middle and the end is a mind blowing acid trip.
kieranwnorman 9 months ago 4
Paul is playing his original '61 Hofner bass there. (well, they were all pretending to play, only the singing was live in the original fast Revolution video) Read Beatles Gear by Andy Babiuk. He explains it all!
njriley55 9 months ago
@njriley55 they 're obviously palying different chords, not even the same song!
swingmanu 4 months ago
out... In...
Pimpnorris 9 months ago
Ah ah ah! What is that i see beeing passed in the background at 0:14 and also if its what i think it is can u pass it my way! xD
taytelay 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In my opinion, Paul McCartney is like the greatest bass player ever. Since he's he went out on his own, he's been a twink, but he plays that bass more badass than I've ever heard in my 56 years.
Dogheadj 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks so much for posting!
Dogheadj 10 months ago
I must say, there was very good drugs back then. James
JamesThomasBand 10 months ago
ooh, very interesting! Cool to hear where some of Revolution 9 started. And the backing vocals going "dad and mama" lol
fifiesponja07 10 months ago
am i the only person who thinks this version is terrible?
scalywaguk 10 months ago
@scalywaguk mmm yeah only you and those two other fags
vvikkzzskk8 9 months ago
@scalywaguk in a word, yes. great version of a tremendous song.
no1wasgeorgiebest 9 months ago
I bet some of you are fellow ZG movers!
RickTNRebel 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
oh yeh John Lennon says vote conservative the democrats r liars
Syzygy60 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lennon talks to me inbetween sleepstate it makes for a rough morning
Syzygy60 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
¤º°¨ ¸„ø¤º°¨„ø¤º°¨°º¤ø„¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ º¤ø„¸
¨°º¤ø„ ¸BEATLES FOREVER!! º¤ø„¸
¸„ø¤º°¨¸„ø¤º „¸¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ ¸„ø¤º Beatles Rule !
luisloo1894 11 months ago
freakin' hot bootleg,ty............also, 1 of my fav Lennon lines was always @ 1:17 John says "when you talk about detruction, don't you know that you can count me out (in)"@ 1:26
sirwob 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@sirwob I heard from his own lops he meant he wants a non violent revilution like Egypt,but if if comes to violence who can gaurantee their actions,I can't
Syzygy60 11 months ago
I lovee thee Beatless!!!<3333!!
thekarlagee 1 year ago
4:23 - I had to close my doors cause mom could hear John's whining lol
Beatles 4ever.
wolan96 1 year ago
Thirty years ago today. Can't believe John is gone.....
renaysummit 1 year ago
Say guys, all I'm hearing here is the 2009 remaster of the the song's White Album version, plus a sample from a segue between two songs from the LOVE album played over and over.
That segue obviously used for the sample herein was made out of a horn piece from the outro of "Strawberry Fields forever", maybe some strings, and some John/Paul/George vocals going "AAAHHHHH" electronically processed for LOVE to match the higher key of the horn and string stuff in the background.
tlatosmd 1 year ago
& towards the end there's also some of the backwards guitar from "I'm only sleeping" & some John mumbling & groaning from "Revolution #9". Can't tell where the mock high-pitched "la-la" is from, though.
But I agree...overall, it sounds even better than the original album version. Too bad Paul's "Honey pie" wouldn't have matched as a follow-up anymore, the end of this version woulda been great to directly cut into George Martin and that studio engineer talking at the start of "Revolution #9".
tlatosmd 1 year ago
Who are you kidding? This "video" is just stills from the White album sessions interspersed with footage from the David Frost show (in which they played the fast version of Revolution.) Nothing new here.
rocknrollcole 1 year ago
at 14 seconds, is he passing a joint?
bruceyboysvideos 1 year ago
@bruceyboysvideos looks like it. lol
XIDoStuffX 1 year ago
Just the four of them. Pure and simple. Listen to that bass line!
rjspeleton 1 year ago
The Beatles NEVER disappoint. WOW!
medicinalsnowball 1 year ago
1:38 Epic Ringo!
FGA333 1 year ago
nice bass work
m7lists 1 year ago
Does anyone else hear him say "in" after saying "don't you know that you can count me out?"
zachinator1 1 year ago 2
@zachinator1 Yes, its clear as day
zoso7889 1 year ago
I love this version 'cause she communicate the true jam session sound:D this is the BEATLES!
TonyBa06 1 year ago
The BEST original Beatles video on YouTube so far! PLEASE PLEASE ME and do loads more!
LooseLipsSyncChips 1 year ago
wow. so this is the first version???? damn!!! I like this one better. The 2nd version is in the beatles rockband
CERPAS4 1 year ago
Dont u know its gonna be alright? LIFE EXPLAINED IN 7 WORDS
santitone 1 year ago
Who would've known that Glenn Beck would be using this song for his own demented purposes more than 40 years later.
goback3spaces 1 year ago
Didn't they bury John Lennon's Rickenbacker 325, and Paul McCartney's violin bass?
sacramentolove 1 year ago
I want the shirt George is wearing here! (and his orange pants!)
Toady373 1 year ago 3
I actually like this version better! INCREDIBLE!
EricDymond 1 year ago
@EricDymond you must have been smoking too much crack....
I bet ur a homosexual as well.
geetarist666 1 year ago
buen video
Beatles Forever!!!!!!!!!!
carlititititititos 1 year ago
where they passing a joint at like 15 seconds?
pensinger5 1 year ago
@pensinger5
Duh.
latterdaylenin 1 year ago
@latterdaylenin lolol. That's what I thought it was.
pensinger5 1 year ago
This sounds like a cover band are you sure this is the real Mccoy.
zczaldy 1 year ago
@zczaldy I take it you have never listened to the white album then?.....
Yeah, it's real. :)
princeofthemods69 1 year ago
Is that Geoff Emerick talking?
Sistererica 1 year ago
Take your knickers off and letts go lmao.
TheChalkychalk 1 year ago
i was tripping in the end......so trippy
telemanjp 1 year ago
Thanks for this, because thus we can clearly see the blues´ roots of rock´n´roll ...!
The tree and the branches, and the Fab 4 of Liverpool at work!
TrejosEd 1 year ago
Awesome!
jx14aby 1 year ago
Fantastic!
Audiocodes 1 year ago
Katmak21... the video you created for it is really well done! Although it may not seem like much, I liked how Ringo smiles at 2:37 as they sing "it's gonna be alright..."
Really good job and thanks for posting this. - Mike
OrliviaTheCat 1 year ago
yoko. what a worthless item.
purplerugger8 1 year ago
LARGA VIDA A LOS BEATLES!!!, amo su musica. Their music will last until the end of our civilization.
italko 1 year ago
gosh I love them
heyhoolga 1 year ago
I like revolution 1 better then the actual revolution
wellseriously 1 year ago 2
was that ringo passing the dutchie on his right hand side EEEHHHAAAA
dadadruma 1 year ago
They Laumen was the fifth beatle, but now he is at Roompot.
PengPengBoateng2 1 year ago
try mixed revolution 1 take 20 and revolution 9, sound great!!
humadeus 2 years ago
now i see our this ties in with revolution 9 lol
84aa 2 years ago
marry me ringo?
<3
wehookatelynn 2 years ago
Not only is this unedited version great, this compiled video goes along with it to a tee! Dontcha think?
MattHatter 2 years ago 2
The Fast Revolution has the same lyrics as the White Album (slow) version. Same song, different tempo. I have never cared which one got recorded first. I don't consider one or the other the "original." They recorded two versions because, what I read, John wanted to play it slower. Paul and George wanted to rock it up.
I have always preferred the fast one. JMO.
waybabelicious 2 years ago
The others thought that the song wasn't single material in the slow version, so john was pissed and made it hard rock.
OropherThranduil 2 years ago
No, the original Revolution single was released as a B-side to Hey Jude on August 1968 earlier than Revolution 1 which came out in Nov. '68, but you are right that it technically is the original since it was recorded first, but Revolution was much faster and had different lyrics than Revolution 1.
DoggieBark 2 years ago
this is not original version
this is revolution 1
try to search revolution original
you'll see
rrsb45 2 years ago
he means that this version was recorded 1st, so technically this IS the original. In fact this was the first song recorded for the White album sessions. May 68 I think.
richardsnow 2 years ago
I prefer this version to the original Revolution. The "Do Wop" part is genius.
DoggieBark 2 years ago
this IS the original version.
madog20 2 years ago
The Beatles are always my favorite band.
I like their extraordinary talent for songwriting, humor and their charisma.
This version of Revolution with all the new sound effects is new for me and really ....
it's now my favorite version
Nachdenklicher 2 years ago
Well the other three Beatles didn't like either.
bandit269u 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This version sucks! John Lennon was NOT,always right.
bandit269u 2 years ago
Dude I've been wanting to hear this version FOREVER! It doesn't suck, the guys are just jamming out. If you're a musician you should know what that feels like! I do and it's out of this freakin' world.
MattHatter 2 years ago 16
@MattHatter Ive been there your tired , and the music comes from deep inside you , making it more original , more edgier, I personally love anything these chaps set to tape , . . . audio as well video,
hammeron39 9 months ago
@MattHatter No one said it sucked...
McNJmi 8 months ago
@McNJmi Somebody in the comments did.
MattHatter 8 months ago
@MattHatter Oh okay.
McNJmi 8 months ago
iv never seen this before,,,that was fucking brilliant
Ratt1971 2 years ago
this is my fav version
dapa4 2 years ago 2
eat all kinds of chicken roast =D ... =.= lol 6:00
B1aKWoLf 2 years ago
take your knickers off lets go
ThePeople6 2 years ago 2
0:31 geoff emerick saying "take 2" :)
Beatles4President 2 years ago
Nice one. The guy in the orange shirt and black tie. He's almost looks like he's dressed in New Wave... but this is way before then.
ShelterDogs 2 years ago
i thought it was paul D:
lloyd525 2 years ago
Katmak21,did you post part 2?
djminimoto 2 years ago
kick ass!
bill291212 2 years ago
that kid at :27 with george martin is a very young geoff emerick who helped with the beatles recording experimentations,he quit during the making of the''white album'' because of the friction going on between the beatles.
georgelee43211 2 years ago
hey! esa version blues de revolution suena genial, aunque la otra es mas ritmica, las dos son bastante buenas!
kr3n16 2 years ago
so...this is revolution #9 in it's infant stages before adding more sound effects from the emi studio library and other spoken word items.
georgelee43211 2 years ago
no. it's simply Resolution.
semtex2you 2 years ago
no man recolution 1
yeahyeahyaha2 2 years ago
In this vid you can see the first Höfner bass from Hamburg...it remained as a spare bass for years till the making of this vid...a pity it was stolen a few months later.
Thanks for sharing fellow!
Peace♪
Virpatrick 2 years ago
Actually it was stolen just after the video, by a fuckin bastard...I wonder where it is now!
lptomtom 2 years ago
Well...not after the making of Rev...but as you well said... he/she- was/is a.............as you well said♪
Think! "Love me do", please p me &co were recorded with that bass...
FB.....as you well said.
Virpatrick 2 years ago
this is awsome this version should have been released too
hippiejamsession 2 years ago
BLISS !
usergently 2 years ago
Concensus online among Beatles freaks is that the basic track could have been "embellished" using modern recording techniques/trickery etc. Admittedly, it does sound way ahead of its time in terms of the electronic wizardry. But the Fab Four were ahead of the game anyway. Whatever the opinion, it's an interesting and brilliant new version to the one we've grown to know and love on the White Album.
deansgatedora 2 years ago
It's definitely not "embellished". The entire session for this version has been bootlegged... you can hear its creation every step of the way.
NyeTunes 2 years ago
this is good stuff!
KlurckColombus 2 years ago
If the tracks were stolen out of the Dakaota, we all know who stole them .. hint his initials are F.S .. none the less .. This Is A Great FIND .. thank you John !
Buffdoggie 2 years ago
I likes this lots : )
cewduncan 2 years ago
Wow
I found out that this track was mysteriously leaked in the Internet.
They reported that this tape was stolen a while back from the Dakota, but no one knows how
BeatleboyJd 2 years ago
Recorded May 30, 1968, by the way.... not June.
BGC75 2 years ago
una version para verdaderos coleccionistas de corazon de los beatles con la musica de lennon que no deja de impresionar aun despues de muerto que seria si viviese, enseñandole a los rebeldes la rebeldia.
sarbeatle 2 years ago
GRRRRRRREAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
winstonoboogie74 2 years ago 2
GRRRRRRREAT 2 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OneWest72nd 2 years ago 2
This is better than finding £50 on the floor! amazing!
robbw7 2 years ago
Why wasn't Lennon satisfied with this version? They could've put it on the White Album like this. I always had the feeling that those two separate tracks (°1 and °9) were the weakest ones on the album.
BertLeysen 2 years ago 2
INCREDIBLE
ufohead1 2 years ago 10
This track is just AMAZING!! Better than I could have hoped for. I thought it would be very segregated...first part I the song then part II experimental. That's still the running order, but it's way more of a melding.
The song here is essentially what with know with a few minor differences & overall looser feel, but part tow is a morphing that keeps some of the elements of the song's theme but moves into the experimental realm.
This REALLY should have been on "Anthology 3"!!!!!!!!
Blessings!
linclink 2 years ago 15