Wow...what a tard. The guy said so himself that the circuit had to be compromised for this to occur. So, how was the circuit compromised...maybe it was terrorists! We have to assume so because he certainly provides zero insight.
Wow...what a tard. The guy said so himself that the circuit had to be compromised for this to occur. So, how was the circuit compromised...maybe it was terrorists!
How much did they pay their own investigators to try and debunk him? Yes they hired their own group! One problem he has and is still able to reproduce the problem with the excelator. Toyota losses this round!
The "race condition" in the computer could also explain why the car was accellerating. Even notice in cruise control when you accellerate the pedal is depressed even if you don't touch it. Thus in a "race condition" event the computer sent the wrong signal it would cause the car to accellerate (and you can't pull the pedal back) and also disable the fail safe engine override. The brakes would essentially be useless.
all modern cars are controlled completely by an onboard computer. That would actually explain two things:
1. Why car kept accellerating while the brake was pressed
2. Why they CAN'T replicate the problem.
there is a problem known as a "race condition". The problem is fairly well known but it's probably one of the hardest things to isolate because the issue in itself occurs only under very very specific conditions which often cannot be isolated/replicated easily
The protective components are typically TVS or Schottky diodes connected across 5V and 0V. They have a failure mode that could lock both throttle inputs at 2.5V.
After the power is disconnected, the fault clears itself.
The throttle control is a dual potentiometer, one wired the reverse of the other. The signals goes from 0 to 5 volts and 5 to 0 volts as the pedal is depressed. The ECU then checks one voltage as being the complement of the other. So far so good.
Except, as Dr Gilbert demonstrated, when at half throttle (2.5V), the ECU is blind to a fault.
The inputs to the ECU are protected from electrostatic discharge etc. It is not uncommon for the protective components to be packaged in pairs or quads.
Gilbert was absolutely correct - he is not changing the circuit - he simply applied a fault condition to one of the accessible leads. This is standard practice in any FMEA process, and Exponent was very stupid to come out and defend Toyota. Exponent, more than anybody in this business should have realized that somewhere in that ECU the signal trace may route next to a fault in PCB, component, or chassis that generates the same condition.
@tenacioustaut HE didn't admit anything, abc admitted to falsely misleading the tachometer. gilbert never intended it to look that way and he proved that toyota cars can indeed accelerate uncontrollably within the conditions.
@tenacioustaut not all cars will, SOME other brands will, but definitely not all or even most. also, if the car accelerated uncontrollably in a volkswagen, and you hit the brakes they will actually override the acceleration until it eventually stops the car.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- An intensive 10 month investigation into possible causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota cars found no fault with the automaker's electronic throttle control systems, the Department of Transportation announced Tuesday.
Funny how he did not say anything about how Toyota uses 2 throttle position sensors. Two potentiometers built into the pedal that work in reverse of each other. sensor 1 goes low to high and sensor 2 high to low resistance.
Isn't it a strange "coincidence" that within hours of news reports that Toyota has embarked on a campaign to discredit Prof. Gilbert, a few comments suddenly appear that suggest Prof. Gilbert is so like yesterday or something?
The fact is that Prof. Gilbert discovered at least one way to demonstrate a scenario where the Toyota computers and wiring can cause the so-called "Toyota throttle problem" . . .
Logic strongly suggests that if there is one way, then there probably are more ways . . .
Your a fucking Idiot! I can do alot of things and make up some bullshit! this guy is liar PERIOD... Not only Toyota but alot of other companys prove this shit as fake... Toyota showed a BMW DO THIS? so lets go after BMW? fucking dumb ass jerks!
@Zarbonk Why would it be strange? If someone is trying to damage your reputation, I'd find it strange if you DIDN'T do anything about it. I find Toyota's campaign pretty convincing.
his 15 minutes of fame is so over and he looked like a fool now. he rigged the systems to produce his own result. this is nothing more than falsify the data to obtain favorable outcome for personal gain. David W. Gilbert need to go back to school and start all over again.
They should do a investigation on this Professors Gilberts himself.
the director of Stanford University's Center for Automotive Research to try to refute the claims. Toyota said Stanford professor Chris Gerdes will show that the malfunctions Gilbert produced "are completely unrealistic under real-world conditions and can easily be reproduced on a wide range of vehicles made by other manufacturers."
No Toyota dealer or US government official could have thoroughly investigated the problem, since Toyota is only now providing devices to read the EDR. That would have shown if the brake was on, speed and throttle position. 200 Million to one shots happen everyday in the US. Also why was the Sienna not included in the recal?
",,,The analysis of Professors Gilberts demonstration establishes that he has reengineered and rewired the signals from the accelerator pedal. This rewired circuit is highly unlikely to occur naturally and can only be contrived in a laboratory. There is no evidence to suggest that this highly unlikely scenario has ever occurred in the real world. As shown in the Exponent and Toyota evaluations, with such artificial modifications, similar results can be obtained in other vehicles,,,"
Carquestions takes an inside look at the testimony of David Gilbert and Sean Kane as they try and sell a wild theory to Congress. The associate professor Gilbert puts his hand to a remake of some of automotive history's most discredited theories of unintended acceleration while Mr. Kane produces the cooked up paperwork in order to support it. Carquestions attempts to explain "Gilbert's Theorem" but in the end finds a simple explanation is more than sufficient
Wow...what a tard. The guy said so himself that the circuit had to be compromised for this to occur. So, how was the circuit compromised...maybe it was terrorists! We have to assume so because he certainly provides zero insight.
cblukraine 1 year ago
Wow...what a tard. The guy said so himself that the circuit had to be compromised for this to occur. So, how was the circuit compromised...maybe it was terrorists!
cblukraine 1 year ago
American's protectionism SUCKS! Too bad so many Americans are brain-washed. Wake up and see from outside what they are doing.
derekkchung 1 year ago
How much was he paid by the lawyer who sued Toyota? He seems to cross the lines of his brain to speak lots of bullshits. Cool.
Jaikido1000 1 year ago
How much did they pay their own investigators to try and debunk him? Yes they hired their own group! One problem he has and is still able to reproduce the problem with the excelator. Toyota losses this round!
RadioPaul1 1 year ago
@RadioPaul1 Um, if you use his method on other cars, you get the same result. He added two circuits to the electronics to create what end he wanted.
areufkingkiddingme 1 year ago 2
The "race condition" in the computer could also explain why the car was accellerating. Even notice in cruise control when you accellerate the pedal is depressed even if you don't touch it. Thus in a "race condition" event the computer sent the wrong signal it would cause the car to accellerate (and you can't pull the pedal back) and also disable the fail safe engine override. The brakes would essentially be useless.
ramitbhalla 1 year ago
all modern cars are controlled completely by an onboard computer. That would actually explain two things:
1. Why car kept accellerating while the brake was pressed
2. Why they CAN'T replicate the problem.
there is a problem known as a "race condition". The problem is fairly well known but it's probably one of the hardest things to isolate because the issue in itself occurs only under very very specific conditions which often cannot be isolated/replicated easily
ramitbhalla 1 year ago
USA is unfair.
pochi0701 1 year ago
Comment removed
silverMan345 1 year ago
continued from below ...
The protective components are typically TVS or Schottky diodes connected across 5V and 0V. They have a failure mode that could lock both throttle inputs at 2.5V.
After the power is disconnected, the fault clears itself.
stargazer4atime 1 year ago 2
The throttle control is a dual potentiometer, one wired the reverse of the other. The signals goes from 0 to 5 volts and 5 to 0 volts as the pedal is depressed. The ECU then checks one voltage as being the complement of the other. So far so good.
Except, as Dr Gilbert demonstrated, when at half throttle (2.5V), the ECU is blind to a fault.
The inputs to the ECU are protected from electrostatic discharge etc. It is not uncommon for the protective components to be packaged in pairs or quads.
stargazer4atime 1 year ago
Gilbert was absolutely correct - he is not changing the circuit - he simply applied a fault condition to one of the accessible leads. This is standard practice in any FMEA process, and Exponent was very stupid to come out and defend Toyota. Exponent, more than anybody in this business should have realized that somewhere in that ECU the signal trace may route next to a fault in PCB, component, or chassis that generates the same condition.
BTW - I design life support medical products.
stargazer4atime 1 year ago
@stargazer4atime
He has admitted that he made it up
tenacioustaut 1 year ago 5
@tenacioustaut HE didn't admit anything, abc admitted to falsely misleading the tachometer. gilbert never intended it to look that way and he proved that toyota cars can indeed accelerate uncontrollably within the conditions.
Xytos 1 year ago
@Xytos
any cars accelerate under those conditions lol
tenacioustaut 1 year ago
@tenacioustaut not all cars will, SOME other brands will, but definitely not all or even most. also, if the car accelerated uncontrollably in a volkswagen, and you hit the brakes they will actually override the acceleration until it eventually stops the car.
Xytos 1 year ago
@Xytos
Check out what the Ministry of Transport finally admitted: Toyota is safe
tenacioustaut 1 year ago
@tenacioustaut
tenacioustaut 1 year ago
@Xytos
lol
first of all, the condition under which cars accelerate uncontrorabilly wouldnt occur.
Dont be fooled around by this guy
tenacioustaut 1 year ago
@Xytos
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- An intensive 10 month investigation into possible causes of unintended acceleration in Toyota cars found no fault with the automaker's electronic throttle control systems, the Department of Transportation announced Tuesday.
tenacioustaut 1 year ago
Funny how he did not say anything about how Toyota uses 2 throttle position sensors. Two potentiometers built into the pedal that work in reverse of each other. sensor 1 goes low to high and sensor 2 high to low resistance.
pendejo707 2 years ago
dirty white Chinese
farenopusizu 2 years ago
I SMELL BULLSHIT...FOOL IS A LIAR!!
binzsta86 2 years ago
@binzsta86
He has admitted that he made it up.
He knew that the thing happens to OTHER CARS, too; however, he did not even mention it
tenacioustaut 1 year ago 6
Isn't it a strange "coincidence" that within hours of news reports that Toyota has embarked on a campaign to discredit Prof. Gilbert, a few comments suddenly appear that suggest Prof. Gilbert is so like yesterday or something?
The fact is that Prof. Gilbert discovered at least one way to demonstrate a scenario where the Toyota computers and wiring can cause the so-called "Toyota throttle problem" . . .
Logic strongly suggests that if there is one way, then there probably are more ways . . .
Zarbonk 2 years ago 2
Well. Give me a Toyota and ill demonstrate ways to make it burst into flames when you hit the brakes, change gear or turn on the stereo.
If you have to add components to back your argument then it is not credible.
petestowne 2 years ago
Your a fucking Idiot! I can do alot of things and make up some bullshit! this guy is liar PERIOD... Not only Toyota but alot of other companys prove this shit as fake... Toyota showed a BMW DO THIS? so lets go after BMW? fucking dumb ass jerks!
biggiejackson 1 year ago
@Zarbonk Why would it be strange? If someone is trying to damage your reputation, I'd find it strange if you DIDN'T do anything about it. I find Toyota's campaign pretty convincing.
areufkingkiddingme 1 year ago
his 15 minutes of fame is so over and he looked like a fool now. he rigged the systems to produce his own result. this is nothing more than falsify the data to obtain favorable outcome for personal gain. David W. Gilbert need to go back to school and start all over again.
sxn10 2 years ago
@sxn10
yes u r right for that
teggs98 1 year ago
They should do a investigation on this Professors Gilberts himself.
the director of Stanford University's Center for Automotive Research to try to refute the claims. Toyota said Stanford professor Chris Gerdes will show that the malfunctions Gilbert produced "are completely unrealistic under real-world conditions and can easily be reproduced on a wide range of vehicles made by other manufacturers."
usery1z 2 years ago
What makes you think that this guy is qualified to do a detailed analysis.
This is his qualifications
PHD, Workforce Education and Developement, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 2006
MS, Industrial Arts Education, Oklahoma State University, 1981
BS, Industrial Arts Education, Oklahoma State University, 1979
AAS, Industrial Arts, Northern Oklahoma College, 1977
Did he understand the psychology of the car of do an artistic analysis
JohnMathen 2 years ago 3
No Toyota dealer or US government official could have thoroughly investigated the problem, since Toyota is only now providing devices to read the EDR. That would have shown if the brake was on, speed and throttle position. 200 Million to one shots happen everyday in the US. Also why was the Sienna not included in the recal?
slagjumper 2 years ago 2
",,,The analysis of Professors Gilberts demonstration establishes that he has reengineered and rewired the signals from the accelerator pedal. This rewired circuit is highly unlikely to occur naturally and can only be contrived in a laboratory. There is no evidence to suggest that this highly unlikely scenario has ever occurred in the real world. As shown in the Exponent and Toyota evaluations, with such artificial modifications, similar results can be obtained in other vehicles,,,"
waiyade 2 years ago
Carquestions takes an inside look at the testimony of David Gilbert and Sean Kane as they try and sell a wild theory to Congress. The associate professor Gilbert puts his hand to a remake of some of automotive history's most discredited theories of unintended acceleration while Mr. Kane produces the cooked up paperwork in order to support it. Carquestions attempts to explain "Gilbert's Theorem" but in the end finds a simple explanation is more than sufficient
carquestions 2 years ago
His office chair is like a car seat....maybe from a GM automobile, you know, the company he works for.
pavelow235 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
real americans dont drive jap crap
backplane 2 years ago