The Beatles Remastered

[AressiYashiroB]

De que habla la descripcion al final? que paul esta muerto? eso es solo una leyenda

[bjkatt7]

Whoever doesn't love the beatles can SUCK IT.

[jnb432]

I now have all of them in the new remastered formant, and you can REALLY tell a difference if you compare them to the 1987 original remasters.

[pongerjack91]

yo bofojackson at 15 seconds they play the song here there and everywhere

[bofojackson]

whats the name of the song of second 15?

[123plipli4]

@bofojackson "Here, there and everywhere" its on Revolver it's amazing :D

[DmcG120]

at 1:07 a box appears saying that paul died in 1966.......wtf?

[hives8]

What is the 6th song I must know! Please anyone?

[t3hn00bling]

@hives8

HEY JUDE!

Hahaha!

[099697310]

me faltan Let it be y Yellow Submarine para comlpetar la coleccion

[italianstalion04]

whats this guy talking about with paul's "death"?

[italianstalion04]

best 250 bucks i've ever spent

[nano952]

i got it its  so asome

[johneymute]

despites the remastered versions there,re still peoples wich say,s that the original lp,s sound better.

the problem is that cd,s has a limmited sample rate of 44,1 khz,lp,s has a sample rate of 76 khz,that,s 32 khz more than cd,

but putting those cd,s in a 24bit upsampler and/or releasing the remastered versions on sacd will overcome that limmitation,to get even better sound then on lp,s

[FernyBass007]

@johneymute i was waiting for AN HYBRID SACD!!! EDITION!!!! BETTER SOUND......IT WAS BEST 400 DOLLARS BOTH STEREO AND MONO EDITION BOX SETS!!!!!!!

[IBeGodly]

I think these are fab. They sound better to the ears. Though the originals are a ton better - no argue about that. But heck, this is worth the pretty polly and all that deng too!

[lennon1990jr]

ya los tengo todos!!

[chrian31410]

Me gusta mucho!! Do you speak any english? I'm fluent in both espanol y ingles.

[MagcialWorldOfMusic]

I'm not gonna buy these albums, I have those on vinyl, I love the original vinyl Beatles albums a lot better than the remastered CD's. They're pretty cool, but I'm keeping them. I might post these from my Beatles albums on my GE Wildcat.

[kingofpunk1977]

How do you know? You didn't buy them so how can you compare? For your information the CD's sound bloody good. And yes I have them on Vinyl & yes my turntable cuts it

[jiimena4]

Simplemente The Beatles son y seguirán siendo el mejor grupo de la historia... No hay más qué decir. <3

[therotiv4]

seee estoy deacuerdo ñ_ñ

[marcelcruzeiro]

I have a question -- My old stereo receiver (from 1978) has a switchable option stereo/mono mode. So, if I'd buy the stereo remasters and select the mono mode in my receiver, would it be the same as buying the mono remasters? In theory, there should have any difference, am I right? I've tried with stereo cds and it really works (mono mode kills the stereo effect, everything plays in both speakers)...

[JanPB]

The mono versions were (and are) different mixes. Nobody does it this way anymore but back then there were two separate mixing sessions, one for the mono and one for the stereo release.

[Doc141]

IT sounds entirely different. Seriously, longer instrumental at times, different instrumentals, speeds, effects. It's incredible

[iamamannow]

stop lying

[Doc141]

I'm not implying the songs are different songs, I'm saying that they sound VERY different. Some songs are sped up some are slowed down. Hell, Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds has a different pitch, vocal effect, and loudness on different instruments. Sometimes it's just a missing instrument. A lot of the songs sound better because the combined channel gives the rockers more power and heart. It's not always better, but it's worth hearing and sometimes it IS better.

[iamamannow]

they didn't change any pitches or speeds, all's they did was remaster the mixes to sound more stereo/together like versus the cheap bad sharp mixes of the first cd reissues of the records. re panned instruments, turned up or down some sounds, that's it.

[Doc141]

Damnit you don't get what I am saying. The REMASTER was doing what they did in the 60's with high quality. But between the Original and the new MONO and STEREO masters there were a SIGNIFICANT amount of differences (which I pointed to above.) The mono release isn't just the stereo cut back. It's an entirely different thing. If you knew a thing about the Beatles you would know that. Why do you think they would release it in mono? for laughs?

[juglis]

I believe paul actually did have a motorcycle accident in 1965 or sometime around that. In that accident he busted his lip pretty bad. In later photos and videos you can see the scar on the left side of his upper lip.

The whole paul is dead rumor is rubbish.

[TheBeatle65]

i still don't think paul is dead, i mean come on,! in order for albums like sgt pepper or abby road or the white album to sound really good and beautiful, it needs all 4 originall beatles, and they do sound pretty darn good

[RockNRollMusic567]

its good but i think i prefer the older ones or originals maybe beacuse im used to listening to them for ages but its ok, revolver, sgt pepper and abbey road are the best out of them. white album is great too.

[leopizza23]

Let's thank John Lennon and George Harrison for creating the music from The Beatles for all these years since they died! I miss those guys too!

[ziggybomb200]

Paul didn't die you crazy person...even if he really did die in 1966, get over it.

[pampes47]

Here, There and Everywhere for mastada123

[mastada123]

what's the name of the song at 0:14?

[ziggybomb200]

Here, There, and Everywhere [Revolver][1966]

[Mewzilla]

You had me worried about Paul there for a second until I saw "Car Crash". That rumor still going on? Seriously?

[zoodamo]

Yeah, is it just me or is 'Paul is Dead' getting annoying?

[FernyBass007]

this box set is worth it!!! sounds like they did the record this year or a new record!!! about 20 years worth to wait to listen this new remastered tapes!!! worth the money for the beatles fans!!!

[caloydaman]

Damn, just bought the White Album... SUPER SICK!

When u listen to Back in the Ussr, The sound is so clean, that u have the feeling that they're live in front of u, w the guitar amps cranked loud to have a hint of overdrive... LOVE IT... Looking to buy pls pls me since they fixed the instrument vocal volume ratio in the promo...

[ethalinia]

God, how I want that...

[TheFabFour14]

They accomplished the impossile making the Beatles music even better to listen to.

[sunriseRISE]

ABBEY RD 09 SOUNDS LIKE SHITE.. ALL I CAN HEAR IS THE BASS GTR SOUNDING LIKE A SYN.. BASS TONE.....THE VOCALS SOUND WRONG,, NOT STRONG........THEY ONLY GOODTHING IS THE cardboard sleeves...some pic are cool some just make paul look good.. but over all get the MONO

[genericgeorge]

I think this whole remastered thing is a lot of crock. I have the White Album and there is a maybe 15 % improvement on before but nothing like what people go on about. Maybe the early stuff shows more of a big enhancement.

[plangentmusic]

I A/B'd my CD of Sgt. Pepper and the remastered Pepper on youtube. The difference is dramatic.

[popguynj]

SHUT UP AND GET THE ZEN  LOL

[yeaeah]

amazing, just amazing

[fernandopandre]

Let it Be is sounding amazing. Not better than Naked though. Rubber Soul is awesome!!!

[astolast]

sounds much much MUCH too loud.

[MikeyNL1038]

use your volume knob

[tomelaide]

use your volume, knob**

[RedRoseSpeedway09]

This is amazing! Just got the stereo box set, and it sounds incredible! It really is a must-have for Beatles fans :D

[Megus17]

I can't wait till they finally release these on the Zune Marketplace because they would sound amazing on the Zune HD I will be getting with the Bose Headphones I already own.

[juanitorocks13]

zune sucks

microsoft fkn sucks chiness cocks

apple owns

ipod the master

beatles are gods

[Megus17]

Just to let you know, the Zune has much better sound quality than the Ipod making it the ideal choice for music lovers.

[stevets01]

The Zune is for music lovers, iPods are for trend followers.

[odalthila]

for me it's more like zune is for people that want to be different...

stil the new zune looks awesome

[paulonthepiano]

If it weren't for the 1999 re-release of Yellow Submarine, I never would've noticed how mind-blowing Ringo's drumming and George's guitar-playing is on "It's All Too Much".

[paulonthepiano]

I really wish they'd release the entire catalog remixed in 5.1 like they did with Yellow Submarine and Let It Be...Naked. I got my box set yesterday and was hoping for a better sound out of it. Don't get me wrong, so many of the songs sound wonderful (especially the first four albums), but the original mixes are what made the 1987 CDs sound so weak.

[GnikNusEht]

wouldn't have been a logical choice money or time wise.

we might see a move to a universal format of DVD or Blu-Ray in the coming years. but face it, high quality digital downloads is where it's at.

the problem is storage. great for portable devices and computers, but won't fit on a burnable medium right now.

wouldn't be surprised if The Beatles go out on top of the dieing CD market.

[GnikNusEht]

this sounds horrible.

[MikeyNL1038]

128kbit youtube mp3 isn't supposed to sound good.

buy the remasters.

[GnikNusEht]

joking of course, sir

[Revollving]

OMFG I just got mine.

I got a picture with it aswell.

My picture is 7,899 of 10,000

DId anyone else get a Limited edition picture?

The music sounds really good, especially their early albums, they have a huge sound different.!!!

[hrraneruz]

Is there a picture in every box-set?

[Revollving]

I'm not sure, because in at the bottom right corner, it says 7,899 of 10,000.

So i dont think there is, plus I got mine Online.

[hrraneruz]

Oh, all right, thanks. Soudns cool, though. What's the picture?

[jasonseafishseesfish]

They are amazing...I bought the box-set, and The White Album in my opinion has the biggest improvement of any album...It sounds completely different.

[GnikNusEht]

was thinking The White Album, Revolver, or Rubber Soul would have have the biggest improvements.

How does Revolver compare?

[jasonseafishseesfish]

Revolver is WAY better...I'm Only Sleeping, and Tomorrow Never Know sound amazing...Rubber Soul, Sgt. Pepper and The White Album are probably the best remastered though...Let It Be sounds completely the same, Across the Universe actually sounds worse than the original.

[carlosq]

So bad... too expensive! I'll buy when its 50€

[shadowpuppet89]

u dick , fair enuf its cheaper to buy em seperate but ul never get it for 50e, beatles albums have and will always and been expensive

[GnikNusEht]

LOL!

i love how one wants it to be cheaper and another wants it in some outrageous quality on a barely existing format to be played on equipment you're sure as hell not going find at walmart.

[aaaa1427]

Revolver is the BEST!!!

[kingofpunk1977]

Revolver sounds good . Got it today!

[Nihilanth1982]

To anyone who has already bought the remastered stereo boxset - have they fixed the "instruments in one ear, singing in the other" problem in the new stereo versions?

[MikeyNL1038]

no, they didn't.

[GnikNusEht]

jeez, what a know-it-all

[MikeyNL1038]

he asked a question, i answered?

[GnikNusEht]

then the music wouldn't sound so good when you're fucking high man

[blizz2133]

HOW MUCH? :(

TOMORROW!! CANT WAIT

[SharpEdgeSoda]

"Limited Edition ECO FRIENDLY pakaging."

I love the Beatles to death, no other band will ever touch as many lives as these guys. But...

...There is something simulataneously hilarious, ironic, yet sad and enraging at the crap you can sell wih a "green" label.

Its a limited edition collectable,so they made it...bio-degradable.

If I want a collectable, I want it to last damnit! And if you want to be "eco-friendly" MAKE THEM ALL ECO FREINDLY! Not the 3,000 ones you pay an extra $30 for.

[Pan0621]

tomorrow!!

[MrRadioRage]

tommorrow son

[MissGreenDay7]

I can't wait!

[pat976]

ABOUT TIME !!! I'm actually excited, even thought I'm not a huge Beatles fan... I'm gonna enjoy this for sure !

[wendileona]

Im sure this is a super well done remaster from the actual master tapes. There's been so many pseudo remasters that are just hotter re-eq'd stuff.

I have to ask - why not SACD or Blu-Spec, DVD-Audio, SHM versions of these? Imagine the remasters in higher resolution?! Wow. But these look FABulous! The packaging is stunning!

As for LPs - Vinyl is great, but to really enjoy vinyl you need to clean them records really well, get the right turntable and stylus/cartridge, amps, speakers, its WORK.

[MiKikaIwaShizaru]

What I want to know is will they airbrush out Paul's cigarette (like they did with the 1996 "Free as a Bird" CD Maxi-Single) on the Abbey Road cover??

(I am anti-smoking, but that picture on the Free as a Bird CD Maxi-Single looks awkward!)

He is a vegetarian, better to put a carrot in his hand!

(just kidding)

[MiKikaIwaShizaru]

Oops, I meant the Real Love CD maxi-single!

[PearlJammer07]

LOL to the last comment.

[Firebirrd85]

Just download the albums off of torrents sites like I did. Hey paul!

[italianstalion04]

all you need is love

[bruceleeC64]

The cd age isn't over, cd players will be available for decades to come with improving audio systems getting the most out of (remastered) CDs . Super CDs have yet to

Be proven more information doesn't mean better sound or vinyl warmth IMHO. You can still get yinyl 40 after the initial

Beatles releases, 40 years or anywhere near will

Be enough to hang onto

The beatles remastered .

[PearlJammer07]

Well said. I agree with you. There is nothing like the warm sound of vinyl records. CD's don't sound bad though.

[xavierbaudet]

There's is no real point in remastering The Beatles now that the CD-age is virtually over. For those who want to hear them like they sounded in 1965, reissues of vintage equipment should be made available, along with the Beatles' original LP's. They should put the original 4 & 8 tracks on the web so each can choose for himself which revelations he wants to hear or not. For the 2009 versions a Cubase or Logic project file should be downloadable, containing the settings of the remaster.

[MikeyNL1038]

except they don't want you to have the multitracks.

they don't want you remixing.

[PearlJammer07]

This is a really good idea.

[DrHorribleisHere]

Considering the price of other box sets, this is pretty reasonable... My brother got the 300 dollar Radiohead box set. I don't understand why anyone would pay that much for such bad music.

[italianstalion04]

how much is this gonna cost?!?!?!

[frikinjoe]

about 250 dollars.

[chrian31410]

The pricing is a mis-print, right?

I mean unless Paul and/or Ringo deliver it to you themselves, I'm saying it's SLIGHTLY over-priced

[mtf61291]

You do realize how many albums your getting right ?

[chrian31410]

Yes, but it still doesn't justify the price. It really isn't worth it, unless all you ever listen to or care about is The Beatles. I love The Beatles, but not THAT much. I'm perfectly fine with the ORIGNAL remasters. I mean, as an audio engineer, I know how many times you can remaster one song, but there really pushing it.

[FrankyDooDy0]

Huh... it's not only remastered, Chrian31410, it's totally remixed.

[chrian31410]

I'm not trying to start an argument, but if you were to give me the master tracks and like 5 months, I would remix all of their songs with pelasure. For free. Espically with the Rock Band Beatles coming out soon (Which means master track torrents galore!). I'm going to start remixing all of there songs and puting them up on my YouTube. I actually have a remixed song on my YouTube account if you want to check it out to hear my method...

[boadrummer]

The CDs coming out are only remastered. No remixing.

[booooyah12345]

wow

i want this so much

[WARZONEfilms]

9-9-9 yes

[PearlJammer07]

I will not be getting the stereo or mono box set. I am a Beatles fan, but not big enough to shell out money like that. I wonder what hardcore music fans think of these new remasters. Most purists like the sound of the vinyl records. Which is undestanable since that medium offers a higher sampling rate. With these CD's they are going to try and mimic the sound of the record. Which is fine. Will be cool to hear these songs in a new light so to speak.

[jpgrlmhsa]

ya tengo el dinero pa comprar las dos cajas, mono y stereo, y e vamos por el rock band, yeah yeah yeahhhhhhhhhhhh

[ABeatlist]

first time i saw this i cried. :)

[PublioIII]

No puedo esperar mas para comprar los cds remasterizados...espero poder conseguir el paquete en estereo, aunque aqui en Panama sera toda una proeza

saludos Beatles

[jaypark97]

i need the box set......

[arnelmesa]

I like the way the songs sound, especially "Please Please Me". Are the songs in this video stereo or mono? I'm planning on buying the stereo box set because it's cheaper than the mono box set.

[StevieWonder501]

Stereo; the songs have sound on both sides.

[arnelmesa]

Cool, thanks man!

[cptfox]

Wow i saw the price of it:

280 euro's for that stereo/mono pack

thats 389 dollar if i'm correct.

Very expensive :s

[juanjosealva]

280 Euros for the Stereo

320 Euros for the Mono

[TheTexanAtheist]

220 dollars actually lol

[blizz2133]

MUST GET.

[PerryCoxPF93]

the original parlophone LP art looks amazing on a CD

[Oliver2518]

I grew up with their first four albums in stereo on LP records. Finally, the stereo version of the first four albums will be out

with thses new CD releases. I haven't heard the stereo version in years, only mono versions from the old 1987 CDs, so I am very excited about these new remasters.

[MattHatter]

So I see a White Album poster replica jump back into that copy of the CD there! So I take it we're going to finally get The White Album on CD with the poster and four portraits replicated! We already did once, in that lousy 1998 30th Anniversary edition that wasn't remastered! MONO BOX SET?! Droooool.

[tigarx]

Wow, I've got that box set! Never noticed it's mono!

[MattHatter]

LOL! What do you mean you've got that box set?! It hasn't been released yet!

[tigarx]

I was talking about the 30th anniversary edition of the white album

[MattHatter]

Mmmmm, the 30th Anniversary of The White Album was released in mono? Not to my knowledge.  As a matter of fact, it wasn't even remastered. But it was packaged like a miniature version of the album, with the portraits and all.

[STRANGEJAMES85]

Can't wait for the box sets to become avaliable for pre order!

[Paulph04]

It's about time this was done. Mastering technology has moved on massively since the Beatles CDs were originally released 20 years ago. They sound flat and lifeless compared to modern CDs, and although I'm not a massive Beatles fan I'll certainly buy a couple of them.

Another good thing is that the 1st 4 albums are going to be (officially) available on CD in stereo for the 1st time.

[lake40]

this is going to be fantastic i was wondering about the sound level will it be high

[thefadedline]

they have had a slight touch of overall limiting and a volume boost, but nothing too drastic that takes away from the music

[Bellyflops2]

Sure people will be complaining about the sound of these as soon as they come out because that is what people do best.

[Paulph04]

Yes Bellyflops, with Beatles fans being what they are, "It won't be long" before someone starts complaining.

[cexsilia]

09-09-09 wow!!! no puedo esperar mas rock band BEATLE y los discos de los beatles simplemente perfecto!!

[RkivUnderground]

Can anyone tell which albums are on-screen around 0:00 - 0:03 and where? I saw some white albums on the "B" in "Beatles."

[Ricky91993]

Please Please me and With the Beatles!

[Chaserchain]

This is going to be so>>>>GREAT.

[RkivUnderground]

I'd love to hear "A Day in the Life" in 5.1 96/24 sound!

[mikkabouzu]

If these are the remastered versions here...

No, wait, let me rephrase that: I really hope these aren't the remastered versions here, because they sound like major shit. They've obviously been heavily compressed and the balance of the different parts is all fucked-with. I noticed the difference most with the earlier stuff provided here, as the early stuff was never meant to be heard in stereo and just sounds strange. I'm certain neither Geoff Emerick nor Norman Smith would approve.

[MikeyNL1038]

these are the old 1987 cd versions.

and this is youtube. you can't judge the quality of a recording on youtube!

[BoundaryRoads]

I think the Past Masters set is better than the Red and Blue set.

[BoundaryRoads]

Will there ever be a need for a remastered Red and Blue set? I don't think so.

[canadianstudmuffin]

Beatles=THE BEST  :)

[josuenava]

in plenty of XXI century the refresh sound of the beatles, the wonderful work of engineers on Abbey Road must not be limited to the already and old Compact Disc, WILL BE AVAILABLE ON "SACD" "Super Audio CD" using already of 300,000 Samples/s (Vs. 44,100 from CD) from stereo to 5.1 Channels Sound, that capture entirely musical spectrum these are really "Master Quality" Sound

[Oliver2518]

What is HDCD? It sounds like a cheap gimmick to lure audiophile geeks for me. No wonder it didn't caught on...

[Oliver2518]

What is SACD???

[josuenava]

SACD Super Audio CD is a CD can store some GB of information and deliver a audio quality of 300,000 Khz. vs. 44,100 Khz of normal CDA., SACD can support "Studio Audio Quality" transfer sound directly of "studio masters" the higher resolution in SACD let you hear sound clearly (analog sound) and not hear a plain digital sound of CD-Audio, in the market are hybrid SACD that have two layers, one layer can play on any CD Player and the other in a SACD Player offers studio quality sound.

[laloisaac]

dioossss !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[harrygarciamusic]

I'm waiting for this for 20 years! Thanks! The day has come!!!!

[king007ofrock]

The Beatles remastered albums are coming Help,their going to take over abbey road with their rubber souls and revolvers in their yellow submarineits gonna be hard days night trying to get those CDs a lot of people fighting over them

[aussietv2]

i never bought any new Beatles cds because they were done cheaply first time.

[demebeat14]

ese día 9-9-9 podré morir en paz...

[AbbeyRoadForever]

oh good,

hopefully some new clues for iamaphoney haha.

[prismgap]

I'm there......Abbey Road first then The White album

[whichway]

9-9-9 upside down is 6-6-6 are they hinting at something?

[MikeyNL1038]

maybe

[GnikNusEht]

maybe not...

[LtGripweed]

Nah. Just a coincidence.

[MattHatter]

LOL! I just joked about that date with my mom and sister today! 9-9-9 upside down (or is it rightside up) is 6-6-6! BUT it could be referring to the almighty "Number Nine. Number Nine. Number Nine."

[deepeemark]

Nice. ('bout bloody time!)