so how would you describe the 3 waves you drew on the paper?
also, we're looking at a 2d wave, waves are 3d right, is it just how we describe them that way because its easy to understand? or is it a true represenation containing all information in a 2d form?
@coldlogic1 The actual sound wave is 3-d, of course, but we're really only interested in where the wave intersects our ear (or the microphone). It's how the air pressure at that (basically) one point varies over time, which results in a 2-d graph.
my favourite sound does come from a traditional Swedish instrument called the Nyckelharpa (keyed fiddle). It's very closely related to the hurdy gurdy and sort of represents the trend of mechanic instruments in long gone times. in this case on the bowed instruments. it's got resonant strings that do not get touched by the bow but vibrate because of resonant frequencies. sounds like a natural reverb. or like angels to me. you should check that one out.
@HaileISela That's a fun one! I once jammed all sorts of music with myself and another one on guitar and a lady with a nyckelharpa .. first and only time I've seen that instrument. It sounding interesting!
diez- I've bought several guitars to play with, switching necks, p'us etc. Most often it's the p/u's and partic the impedance that affect tone most and of course the amp. I have a 50 quid LP copy that is terrible in many respects but sounds great . I don't believe a 2000 pound Gibson is anywhere near worth the cash. Your copy is probably close enough.
Just as an example of the usefulness of a Fourier transform, it can be used to pick out the multiple natural frequencies of a building, which will vibrate just like a guitar string, only at much lower frequencies (first fundamental freq of a building is ~ 1 Hz vs 440Hz for a typical "A string")
And knowing the natural frequencies of a building is key to understanding its behavior during an earthquake.
@ericwongty I got them as well, and at first I was very excited because I could write any function as a sum of sines and cosines, until I arrived at my math exam...
@heyandy889: The software is a graphical implementation of a Fast Fourier algorithm. Fourier analysis is the breaking down of a complex waveform into it's component sinusoid frequencies. You can get the same display anymore on any audio software, like Audigy or Goldwave, and even on various sound playbacks, such as Winamp or MS Media. Of note only to weird EEs, the similar LaPlace transform breaks down waveforms into their component exponential series. Ummmmm... Just thot I'd mention that...
The way that different frequencies get played is very cool with musical instruments as well. Different instruments have different tones because of of the overtones that they play when the strings or notes are played. For example if you play on a piano a C with an unmuted 8ve higher C and G and yell into the piano the piano will take your yell and turn it into that highest frequency. The way these frequencies work is very cool. Love the video. (BTW get rid of that MG)
Interesting how one responds to this as a guitar player with some interest in science, it's like sciencesciencesciencescience...Ooh! Science with guitars! It all makes sense now!
@betadrum1 Delighted that you recognised the opening riff to "Deliverance"! Possibly the best use of flattened fifths in metal (apart from the riff to "Black Sabbath", of course!)
I'm a huge Opeth fan - "Ghost Reveries" is in my top ten, possibly top five, albums of all time...
@Moriarty2112 good man! - the end section to that song blows me away!
you heard porcupine tree? its the guy who produced "blackwater park" 's band. (forgive the clumsyness!) - it's much more pop but some of the musicianship is fantastic! (although they can go heavy when they need to!) - and the drummer is insanely/annoyingly good.
@betadrum1 Ah, yes, the last four minutes of "Deliverance" - goosebumps every time!
Porcupine Tree are another favourite. "Deadwing" is probably my favourite album - "Arriving Somewhere But Not Here" has that blend of progressive and metal elements I love. Steve Wilson is an exceptionally talented bloke. He even had Alex Lifeson (Rush) guest on "Fear of a Blank Planet".
Best not get me onto the subject of Rush, though - I've been hooked ever since I heard "All The World's A Stage"....
i loved fourier in my engineering carrer, and is very usefull to understand it even thou you wont use it for your carreer. i took both fourier series and fourier transform and isnt quite difficult it just require practice as everything in life.
fourier analysis is one of my most favourite things ive learnt about in my physics course, it's such an awesome realization that complicated waveforms can be built from the simplest sine waves. i love stuff like that.
What amazed me the most learning about Fourier transforms is that you can do it with any shape. You could trace the profile of George Washington's face or something, convert the points into numerical inputs, and then express that graph as a sum of sine waves, no matter what the input is. (The number of waves necessary depends on the number of inputs.) That's just crazy.
@Komojo: One of the neat things is that the analysis that converts a waveform in the time domain into the equivalent in the frequency domain can be reversed. Nothing is lost in the transform. (At least that's true if I remember it right. Phase?)
ok,i understand the basic idea... the oscillating string will wiggle wildly and displace the air molecules at diffrent rates...creating different regions of pressure...its easy for me to picture the logingtudal wave in the air molecules effected by a simple sinusodial wave...but how will this longitudal wave look when effected by a complex wave such as comming from a guitar string??
@gyshalom: The complexity of a guitar string will still analyze out. For example, if you could generate a square waveform on a guitar, it will analyze out as the sinusoid of the basic frequency plus declining amplitudes of even harmonics of the basic frequency. A triangular waveform analyzes out as the base plus declining amplitudes of odd harmonics. These are the easy ones; the real waveforms of a guitar string are complex and involve all sorts of harmonics, and even forced non-harmonics.
Music i get, some of the physics in the other videos i get, this video i follow totally, i just find the mathemathics involved incredibly difficult.
Took me months just to understand chi squared in statistics, id love to learn physics at undergrad and possibly post grad, i just fear my maths will never be good enough to be a physicist.
Youtube channels like this are of imense importance to me, it allows me to try teach myself something i dont think i could learn academically.
You, sir, should check out MIT's channel on youtube. Look for professor's Gilbert Strang (for mathematics) and Walter Lewin (for physics). I'd especially recommend some of Lewins lectures on Waves and oscillations.
And don't worry, you don't need to understand math like that when you start your undergrad. You will get courses in calculus and linear algebra. In Denmark where I'm from you recieve math education for the first one and a half year.
Thanks for the encouragement, trying to get into the life sciences at undergraduate level at the moment, well at least for 2010. I am passionate about all the sciences equally, but i find the advanced maths involved in some of the physics hard, however the harder i find a subject the more i involve myself.
Thank you for the recomendations, i already had MIT subbed on my channel, but the help was appreciated, i am familiar with Walter Lewin, but not the other guy, will check them out! TY!
@drokles: However, if you do understand the math, the beauty of it all is overwhelming. Fourier analysis for simple waveforms can actually be computed by hand (the only way to do it before about 1965); complex forms are hugely difficult. But the calculus of infinite series converges with this. When you absorb all that and suddenly you see how it all fits together. It's a moment of beauty.
In your newer video on antenna's, you mention wavelengths. if you didn't know the frequency the rubber wire was oscillating at, you could measure the wavelength and figure it out with the following equation:
I'm fairly sure that the equation you mentioned only works for photons - ie electromagnetic waves. You need to take into account the speed of the wave through the rubber in this case.
Sadly, you couldn't calculate the wavelength anyway because the speed of the wave in the rubber wire is zero, which is why they call it a standing wave.
The Fourier Hypothisis states that any wave is a sum of sin and cosin waves. While it remains an hypothisis it's used everywhere today, mostly in the form of FFTs (Fast Fourier Transforms) in the Levenson algorithm. The product is a power spectrum showing the energy in the different sin and cosin components, (the lower graph on the computer display).
The older prof mentioned that by plucking on the string at different places you get different pitches on the guitar! Oops, that's not right -- I think he misspoke. In fact, if the string doesn't change length (by pushing on a fret), the pitch is the same no matter where you pluck it! There might be some differences in overtones briefly so the timbre of the note may vary slightly but the pitch is the same no matter where you pluck it. Right?
@stieg003: what you get is different waveforms based on the basic frequency of the string. If you pluck it 1/4 the way from one end, you get a base note rich in odd harmonics. If you move and pluck it elsewhere, you get the same base note with different timbre (harmonic mix).
Not quite Northern Ireland but pretty close. I was brought up in Co. Monaghan (Castleblaney). I then spent about eight years in Dublin before moving to Nottingham. Good to hear that you can detect the Monaghan accent!
@Chentiangemalc: It was your comment on the Frequency (nu) video (elsewhere on the Sixty Smbols channel) that prompted a lengthier discussion of Fourier analysis, so thank *you*. We could, of course, have made an hour long video on Fourier analysis and still have only scratched the surface...
I have some fond memories of fourier & wavelets in my study days... but what path did I take...what have I done that led me to here so far away from the interesting things I once learned about!?
Your videos make me want to return to university *now*! Great work! I'm looking forward to your next videos -- I hope you will continue producing more material, even when all 60 symbols are complete.
@Wongsmokesbong: It is indeed a solid state amplifier (a 10 W Marshall practice amp). How I would love to have a 100 W valve (tube) Marshall stack in my office but I suspect I might get complaints about the noise....
I agree that there's something about the harmonic content generated by a valve amp that makes them in many cases sound much better than a solid state amp. It depends on what speakers you're driving, however. I also "scoop out" most of the mid-range frequencies in any case...
Looks like Professor Moriarty is a Jedi. 3:08 :D
coolpop1234 19 hours ago
so how would you describe the 3 waves you drew on the paper?
also, we're looking at a 2d wave, waves are 3d right, is it just how we describe them that way because its easy to understand? or is it a true represenation containing all information in a 2d form?
coldlogic1 4 weeks ago
@coldlogic1 The actual sound wave is 3-d, of course, but we're really only interested in where the wave intersects our ear (or the microphone). It's how the air pressure at that (basically) one point varies over time, which results in a 2-d graph.
MrTanookiMario 1 week ago
"If I pluck this string here ... or if I pluck it over here ... " Pluck the damn string! The suspense is killing me!
pvolt 1 month ago
my favourite sound does come from a traditional Swedish instrument called the Nyckelharpa (keyed fiddle). It's very closely related to the hurdy gurdy and sort of represents the trend of mechanic instruments in long gone times. in this case on the bowed instruments. it's got resonant strings that do not get touched by the bow but vibrate because of resonant frequencies. sounds like a natural reverb. or like angels to me. you should check that one out.
HaileISela 1 month ago
@HaileISela That's a fun one! I once jammed all sorts of music with myself and another one on guitar and a lady with a nyckelharpa .. first and only time I've seen that instrument. It sounding interesting!
Kafzilla 1 month ago
someone at my school used fourier analysis on "a hard day's night" by the beatles to figure out the beginning chord which was apparently a mystery.
it turns out theres a very quiet F (or F#, cant remember) played on piano.
affablegiraffable 1 month ago
So no one noticed that the note he called A was actually a concert G? Metalheads and their downtuning :P
Kntrabssi 2 months ago
Moriarty eh?
I'll alert the Yard to send Holmes after you.
runnybabbit12 4 months ago
Telekinesis @ 3:09 !!!
phuckingkunt 4 months ago in playlist sixty symbols
diez- I've bought several guitars to play with, switching necks, p'us etc. Most often it's the p/u's and partic the impedance that affect tone most and of course the amp. I have a 50 quid LP copy that is terrible in many respects but sounds great . I don't believe a 2000 pound Gibson is anywhere near worth the cash. Your copy is probably close enough.
wblakesx 5 months ago
Professor Moriarty is playing Sherlock with Physics
Neavris 5 months ago
Maybe you could get some kind of high frequency bionic ears, 6:54. So you can hear the irritating noise.
av733 6 months ago
Comment removed
av733 6 months ago
100 quid, f n gibson for 2000
wblakesx 6 months ago
@wblakesx
It's a cheap Les Paul copy guitar, that's why it sounds like crap.
Deizelcore 6 months ago
i think i want more of dr irish playing guitar
pwed546 7 months ago 4
can I have cords!
ravishethwala 7 months ago
METAL!!!
Ignorantf00l 7 months ago
i liked the wahwah pedal
mpdp85 8 months ago
Just as an example of the usefulness of a Fourier transform, it can be used to pick out the multiple natural frequencies of a building, which will vibrate just like a guitar string, only at much lower frequencies (first fundamental freq of a building is ~ 1 Hz vs 440Hz for a typical "A string")
And knowing the natural frequencies of a building is key to understanding its behavior during an earthquake.
nbachmann 8 months ago
Interesting, instructive video, thanks Prof(s).
ghgjftythnhcfghdty 9 months ago
Math and music are cousins. It is no surprise that many of the great mathematicians were obsessed with music. See Pythagorean tuning, for example
MusicalDarkHorse 9 months ago
ok i'm doin fourier in my engineering course, and i hate them.
ericwongty 10 months ago
@ericwongty I got them as well, and at first I was very excited because I could write any function as a sum of sines and cosines, until I arrived at my math exam...
colouredmirrorball 8 months ago
ELECTRONICS!
axelasdf 10 months ago
I think Philip Moriarty is one the coolest professors out there!
PanzarMetal 11 months ago 8
\m/
angelohsa1 11 months ago 4
hahahaha AWESOME intro
csguy12 11 months ago
I like your taste in music prof.!
haavardjenssen 1 year ago
Hell yea, physics and guitar jammin, nice!
panzarw 1 year ago
Well the guitar riffage isn't really surprising, since this channel has always rocked :)
MarkArandjus 1 year ago
love it
That is a really neat piece of software on Prof. Moriarty's computer.
Also, I sympathize with him about playing music. I became a Computer Science major to pay the bills. Now, I can only play guitar in my free time.
heyandy889 1 year ago
@heyandy889: The software is a graphical implementation of a Fast Fourier algorithm. Fourier analysis is the breaking down of a complex waveform into it's component sinusoid frequencies. You can get the same display anymore on any audio software, like Audigy or Goldwave, and even on various sound playbacks, such as Winamp or MS Media. Of note only to weird EEs, the similar LaPlace transform breaks down waveforms into their component exponential series. Ummmmm... Just thot I'd mention that...
puncheex 1 year ago
The way that different frequencies get played is very cool with musical instruments as well. Different instruments have different tones because of of the overtones that they play when the strings or notes are played. For example if you play on a piano a C with an unmuted 8ve higher C and G and yell into the piano the piano will take your yell and turn it into that highest frequency. The way these frequencies work is very cool. Love the video. (BTW get rid of that MG)
Furiouslyfappin 1 year ago
I'm math professor, but I'm in love with physics now :)!
perfect man this professor Philip :)!
kisses from bosnia :)!
majambl 1 year ago
Comment removed
majambl 1 year ago
Interesting how one responds to this as a guitar player with some interest in science, it's like sciencesciencesciencescience...Ooh! Science with guitars! It all makes sense now!
someguyoketcetc 1 year ago
VooDoo Child
micol018 1 year ago
I misread this as "Fournier's gangrene"
insme 1 year ago
professor moriarty is an opeth fan!
betadrum1 1 year ago 2
@betadrum1 Delighted that you recognised the opening riff to "Deliverance"! Possibly the best use of flattened fifths in metal (apart from the riff to "Black Sabbath", of course!)
I'm a huge Opeth fan - "Ghost Reveries" is in my top ten, possibly top five, albums of all time...
All the best,
Philip
Moriarty2112 1 year ago
@Moriarty2112 good man! - the end section to that song blows me away!
you heard porcupine tree? its the guy who produced "blackwater park" 's band. (forgive the clumsyness!) - it's much more pop but some of the musicianship is fantastic! (although they can go heavy when they need to!) - and the drummer is insanely/annoyingly good.
Rich
betadrum1 1 year ago
@betadrum1 Ah, yes, the last four minutes of "Deliverance" - goosebumps every time!
Porcupine Tree are another favourite. "Deadwing" is probably my favourite album - "Arriving Somewhere But Not Here" has that blend of progressive and metal elements I love. Steve Wilson is an exceptionally talented bloke. He even had Alex Lifeson (Rush) guest on "Fear of a Blank Planet".
Best not get me onto the subject of Rush, though - I've been hooked ever since I heard "All The World's A Stage"....
Philip
Moriarty2112 1 year ago
Physics rocks!
hadr0n 1 year ago
shit that copy looks nice, the only reason i realized was because of the headstock
rovusss 1 year ago
I was hoping we were about to hear Voodoo child then :P
smeghead666 1 year ago
OMG?! Is this guy named Professor Moriarty?!
pbtwentythree 1 year ago
and i needed 3 years of studies to understand this thing that explained here in 7:26 min?
nulev 1 year ago
i loved fourier in my engineering carrer, and is very usefull to understand it even thou you wont use it for your carreer. i took both fourier series and fourier transform and isnt quite difficult it just require practice as everything in life.
champignones 1 year ago
fourier analysis is one of my most favourite things ive learnt about in my physics course, it's such an awesome realization that complicated waveforms can be built from the simplest sine waves. i love stuff like that.
jimmyshitbags 1 year ago
We can think of video compression and image compression computation as well ;)
ogatobranco 1 year ago
What amazed me the most learning about Fourier transforms is that you can do it with any shape. You could trace the profile of George Washington's face or something, convert the points into numerical inputs, and then express that graph as a sum of sine waves, no matter what the input is. (The number of waves necessary depends on the number of inputs.) That's just crazy.
Komojo 1 year ago
@Komojo: One of the neat things is that the analysis that converts a waveform in the time domain into the equivalent in the frequency domain can be reversed. Nothing is lost in the transform. (At least that's true if I remember it right. Phase?)
puncheex 1 year ago
1:50 I thought someone cussed for a second!
Kowzorz 1 year ago
i ask my physics teacher how sound waves applied to my guitar his explanation was sup par compared to this
TheLockdawg 2 years ago
No way - Prof. Moriarty. Way too cool man!
doubledown187 2 years ago
Comment removed
mikecuzins 2 years ago
ok,i understand the basic idea... the oscillating string will wiggle wildly and displace the air molecules at diffrent rates...creating different regions of pressure...its easy for me to picture the logingtudal wave in the air molecules effected by a simple sinusodial wave...but how will this longitudal wave look when effected by a complex wave such as comming from a guitar string??
gyshalom 2 years ago
@gyshalom: The complexity of a guitar string will still analyze out. For example, if you could generate a square waveform on a guitar, it will analyze out as the sinusoid of the basic frequency plus declining amplitudes of even harmonics of the basic frequency. A triangular waveform analyzes out as the base plus declining amplitudes of odd harmonics. These are the easy ones; the real waveforms of a guitar string are complex and involve all sorts of harmonics, and even forced non-harmonics.
puncheex 1 year ago
Music i get, some of the physics in the other videos i get, this video i follow totally, i just find the mathemathics involved incredibly difficult.
Took me months just to understand chi squared in statistics, id love to learn physics at undergrad and possibly post grad, i just fear my maths will never be good enough to be a physicist.
Youtube channels like this are of imense importance to me, it allows me to try teach myself something i dont think i could learn academically.
Thanks guys!
TheCynicalAtheist 2 years ago 70
some of the most famous physicists of all time didn't do their own maths.
i think Faraday was one
adamthecg 2 years ago 33
You, sir, should check out MIT's channel on youtube. Look for professor's Gilbert Strang (for mathematics) and Walter Lewin (for physics). I'd especially recommend some of Lewins lectures on Waves and oscillations.
And don't worry, you don't need to understand math like that when you start your undergrad. You will get courses in calculus and linear algebra. In Denmark where I'm from you recieve math education for the first one and a half year.
I think you should go for it :).
drokles 2 years ago 4
Thanks for the encouragement, trying to get into the life sciences at undergraduate level at the moment, well at least for 2010. I am passionate about all the sciences equally, but i find the advanced maths involved in some of the physics hard, however the harder i find a subject the more i involve myself.
Thank you for the recomendations, i already had MIT subbed on my channel, but the help was appreciated, i am familiar with Walter Lewin, but not the other guy, will check them out! TY!
TheCynicalAtheist 2 years ago
@drokles: However, if you do understand the math, the beauty of it all is overwhelming. Fourier analysis for simple waveforms can actually be computed by hand (the only way to do it before about 1965); complex forms are hugely difficult. But the calculus of infinite series converges with this. When you absorb all that and suddenly you see how it all fits together. It's a moment of beauty.
puncheex 1 year ago
"that allows us to distinguish an A note on guitar"
the note he played was a G haa
hiyabuddy69 2 years ago
I'm impressed! I tune down by a tone (or a tone and a half) so when I pluck an open "A", as you say, it's indeed a G.
Did you compare it against a known note or have you got ...gasp... perfect pitch?!
Philip (person in video playing guitar)
Moriarty2112 2 years ago
haa no i havent got perfect pitch yet
i could hear it wasnt a G and i was holding my guitar and played that note
by the way these are very interesting videos cheers for them mate
hiyabuddy69 2 years ago
i cant check it right now if it is realy g :), but it could be as many videos in youtube are a semitone or two off
AtomosNucleous 2 years ago
Comment removed
BanderHM 2 years ago
In your newer video on antenna's, you mention wavelengths. if you didn't know the frequency the rubber wire was oscillating at, you could measure the wavelength and figure it out with the following equation:
frequency = speed of light / wavelength
bng44270 2 years ago
Hey,
I'm fairly sure that the equation you mentioned only works for photons - ie electromagnetic waves. You need to take into account the speed of the wave through the rubber in this case.
I'm pretty sure. (!)
Quantum024 2 years ago
frequency is also equal to the speed of sound divided by the wavelength... different scale really. lol
minus00 2 years ago
That equation is for electromagnetic waves.
Sadly, you couldn't calculate the wavelength anyway because the speed of the wave in the rubber wire is zero, which is why they call it a standing wave.
cagedkiller360 2 years ago
THE WATCHTOWER LOL
JonNebula11 2 years ago
The Fourier Hypothisis states that any wave is a sum of sin and cosin waves. While it remains an hypothisis it's used everywhere today, mostly in the form of FFTs (Fast Fourier Transforms) in the Levenson algorithm. The product is a power spectrum showing the energy in the different sin and cosin components, (the lower graph on the computer display).
gamesbok 2 years ago
Am I the only one who finds it hilarious that his name is Professor Moriarty? He probably gets that all the time.
culwin 2 years ago
The older prof mentioned that by plucking on the string at different places you get different pitches on the guitar! Oops, that's not right -- I think he misspoke. In fact, if the string doesn't change length (by pushing on a fret), the pitch is the same no matter where you pluck it! There might be some differences in overtones briefly so the timbre of the note may vary slightly but the pitch is the same no matter where you pluck it. Right?
stieg003 2 years ago
I agree.
kirkmax 2 years ago
I thought it made a slight difference how far away from the pickup(s) you pluck/strum the string(s).
soaper4 2 years ago
@stieg003: what you get is different waveforms based on the basic frequency of the string. If you pluck it 1/4 the way from one end, you get a base note rich in odd harmonics. If you move and pluck it elsewhere, you get the same base note with different timbre (harmonic mix).
puncheex 1 year ago
It's quite fitting how he gets so excited about fourier analysis that he is compelled to break into blue movie wah wah music.
TableWolfMusic 2 years ago
how much is his guitar? 100 'quits'?how much is that?
toterer 2 years ago
he said "100 quid"
thats £100
=]
toxik2005 2 years ago
How much USD is that?
soaper4 2 years ago
Roughly $165
toxik2005 2 years ago
Such a "complex" phenomenon (which has some much of practical implications in our daily life), explained in such a simple "cool" way .... !
Thanks.
SearchingAbsolute 2 years ago
boom chicka wah wah.
I know that music ;o)
t0nybaker 2 years ago 2
Sounded like slayer
xmaker1 2 years ago
you definately have to do a video with the prof playing more guitar.
companyofthefallen 2 years ago 5
absolutely brilliant
this just gets better and better,
Cheers from Venezuela
brilliantfranz 2 years ago 2
Are you From Northern Ireland? i couldnt happen to notice your accent
darrenc12pdg123 2 years ago
Not quite Northern Ireland but pretty close. I was brought up in Co. Monaghan (Castleblaney). I then spent about eight years in Dublin before moving to Nottingham. Good to hear that you can detect the Monaghan accent!
Moriarty2112 2 years ago
Wish he can play more Guitar ...-_-
BuggttiVeyronW16 2 years ago
Waves are my favourite part of physics, they make me happy :) I'm a synthesist, that's why.
Envergure 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
good video, thanks.
chentiangemalc 2 years ago
@Chentiangemalc: It was your comment on the Frequency (nu) video (elsewhere on the Sixty Smbols channel) that prompted a lengthier discussion of Fourier analysis, so thank *you*. We could, of course, have made an hour long video on Fourier analysis and still have only scratched the surface...
Best wishes, Philip
Moriarty2112 2 years ago
It's too bad that theirs the 10 min limit. I'm sure they could make better ones without it.
yared94 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
MichaelERutherford 2 years ago
stop complaining...
Acid113377 2 years ago
They explain what Fourier analysis is and does. If they went into any detail it would be beyond what the average youtube viewer could understand.
CaptainSpaktastic 2 years ago 4
Great Video. I love physics but god I hate his accent lol
MichaelERutherford 2 years ago
Comment removed
ambioct 2 years ago
I have some fond memories of fourier & wavelets in my study days... but what path did I take...what have I done that led me to here so far away from the interesting things I once learned about!?
Your videos make me want to return to university *now*! Great work! I'm looking forward to your next videos -- I hope you will continue producing more material, even when all 60 symbols are complete.
celeph 2 years ago
Lord. Fourier...I studied that. It's not as easy as you'd think...
JimPrower 2 years ago
I definatly feel there need to be more guitars in physics. I wonder how many physics students have a professor they can jam with. Great video
grnlfe01 2 years ago
I study Chemical Physics and play guitar but don't know any riffing profs yet lol. Maybe one day:P
MichaelERutherford 2 years ago 4
great vid
and you have a cool les paul prof
bb0ss 2 years ago
Did Roger Bowley borrow that shirt from Nelson Mandela?
CaptainSpaktastic 2 years ago
you should have miked the amp! (actually if it was solid state it probably wouldn't sound too good anyway)
wongsmokesbong 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Wongsmokesbong: It is indeed a solid state amplifier (a 10 W Marshall practice amp). How I would love to have a 100 W valve (tube) Marshall stack in my office but I suspect I might get complaints about the noise....
I agree that there's something about the harmonic content generated by a valve amp that makes them in many cases sound much better than a solid state amp. It depends on what speakers you're driving, however. I also "scoop out" most of the mid-range frequencies in any case...
Moriarty2112 2 years ago