Added: 5 years ago
From: jonsol
Views: 215,633
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (368)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oh my god. I find him so attractive like this.

  • This comment section is littered with self heightened farts in the wind.

  • I have followed the Beatles since the "Ed Sullivan show" in 1964. I have lived the before Beatles life and the after. If you weren't there, you can even comprehend the impact they had on our society. A wave that transformed our way of thinking, from accepting the old ways, to entering a world of new possibilities , free of past constraint. Say what you want about George Harrison, but he was always a seeker of peace with in us. Listen to "within without you" and seek the truth within yourself

  • Comment removed

  • @shonnaraebellmusic - Many of my comments are "opinion".

    The facts support my opinions. It's suspicious that you question

    my "facts" while completely overlooking theirs. I happen to think

    George would have achieved a kind of noble fame had he been

    more honest and truly humble instead of playing games. Now, his

    fame has an asterisk. "Plagiarizer" and someone "Living In A Material

    World" because he didn't have the discipline or the character to live

    it any other way.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • George Harrison was a brilliant, talented and beautiful man. He gave well thought out answers. George was so delightfully humble. No doubt you will love the "Living in the Material World" dvd.

    George Harrison - Louise left her stamp on her beautiful son with the wavy hair.

  • @BeatleBangs1964 - With all due respect...where

    does this myth making come from? I simply don't

    SEE a "beautiful man". I see a depressed and often

    BITTER MAN. "Talented" perhaps. "Brilliant"? Not

    likely. George struggled with music. George's new

    (only) documentary skipped theaters and went

    straight to cable TV. A colosal 4 hour opus about a

    minor Beatle had no wide appeal. Considering this

    was a Scorsese film about a Beatle...this was a

    terrible rejection of both film maker and subject.

  • @FrlghtWolf Everyone goes through a phase where they become disillusioned with things and may even begin to slander their idols. The result is either acceptance of other people's shortcomings or bitterness and strenuous objection to every little thing. I like George but I do not turn a blind eye to his faults, nor do I need someone to repeatedly acknowledge them. Therefore, no one in these videos is fazed by your silly comments. If they really are coming from a 44 year old man, that's just sad.

  • @aneil68 - If not for George's lifetime of spiritual posturing

    it might be easier to forgive his hypocrisies. As a culture we

    tend to overlook the eccentricities of our talented geniuses.

    However, George wasn't a genius. It seems just as disingenuous

    to come to a video and foist exotic praise about a mediocre

    musician as it does to shit on him. Where were you when his

    fans BEATIFY him as a saint? It's curious. Unlike the others,

    George seems to attract an awkward, uneducated fan base.

  • @FrlghtWolf You all just love your intellectual wisdom spewed for what? George, as all of us was just a person, but tried to find a high that is real. I heard it in his music and it is in us all. Though for some it's hard to see...

  • @aneil68 - These are not "little" things. If YOU were to

    preach health while smoking a cigarettes you would

    rightfully be seen as an idiot. When George does it a few

    thousand kids are going to start smoking.You seem to

    think he was talented, and therefore worthy of forgiving

    his hypocrisies (not logical anyway). I happen to think he

    was NOT terribly "talented" and therefore, NEVER my "idol".

    How logical is it to send me a long winded post to tell me that

    you don't read my posts?

  • @TwoUselessLegs LOL. Why did you bother with that? I didn't reply to your other silly comment because it was just more irrelevant spew. Now you decide to address my points in the hope that I am going to say something more? Whatever man.

  • @aneil68 - You wrote me a long winded post waxing

    philosophical about the effects of passing time and "idols"

    and blah blah blah. Then, I responded (I'm not a potted

    plant). You offered a qualified acknowledgement that

    George was flawed but then with the other side of your

    mouth you claim you don't need reminding. Obviously you

    do. Get up off your knees. Quit genuflecting at the altar of

    celebrities. Especially mediocre ones. If you don't wish to

    talk...DON'T TALK. Easy? LOL

  • intelligent interview,with George relaxed and honest.All aspiring presenters should watch this to see how it should be done.Ask genuine interesting questions,know your subject and let it roll! The most interesting aspect was when he said that discovering India was his greatest achievement in the 60's! only someone like George who was in the most successful band of all time could get away with saying that! Check out 'Living in the Material World' movie,illuminating.

  • He is the spitting image of his dad.

  • BarryDennen13 Tell me about it, mate. Anyways, I've seen your videos and think they're mahhvalous.

  • I don't get it. Every time I come onto a George Harrison video, it's full of dumb cunts spouting bullshit about how crap he is.

  • @BarryDennen12 It's the same messed up person with multiple accounts

  • George Harrison is living proof ...I mean well, now dead proof that you don't need to be talented to be famous.

  • MAKES ME SMILE TO LISTEN TO GEORGE. A KIND HEART & SOUL. HE ALSO DIDN'T EAT ANIMALS, JSUT AS PAUL AND RINGO DON'T EAT ANIMALS EITHER. PAUL DID WEAR LEATHER?? GEORGE BEGAN TO SEEK MORE THAN THE MATERIAL BULL SHIT. YOGA AND HIGHER CONSCIOUSNESS. ONE OF THE REASONS HE WAS VEGETARIAN. THE INFLUENCES AROUND HIM WHILE ON THIS JOURNEY TO INDIA ALSO MADE A CONNECTION TO MORE TO LIFE THAN "THINGS". LOOK AT THE SHIT THE WORLD AND HE WAS SAD AT ALL THE SUFFERING. HE LIVED A GREAT JOURNEY YET SHORT LIVED!

  • MAKES ME SMILE TO LISTEN TO GEORGE. A KIND HEART & SOUL. HE ALSO DIDN'T EAT ANIMALS, JSUT AS PAUL AND RINGO DON'T EAT ANIMALS EITHER. PAUL DID WEAR LEATHER?? GEORGE BEGAN TO SEEK MORE THAN THE MATERIAL BULL SHIT. YOGA AND HIGHER CONSCIOUSNESS. ONE OF THE REASONS HE WAS VEGETARIAN. THE INFLUENCES AROUND HIM WHILE ON THIS JOURNEY TO INDIA ALSO MADE A CONNECTION TO MORE TO LIFE THAN "THINGS". LOOK AT THE SHIT THE WORLD AND HE WAS SAD AT ALL THE SUFFERING. HE LIVED A GREAT JOURNEY YET SHORT LIVED.

  • MAKES ME SMILE TO LISTEN TO GEORGE....AND SUCH A KIND HEART. HE WAS THE FISRT TO PUT ON A CONCERT FOR THE STARVING IN INDIA. HE CARED FOR OTHERS AND SHOWED IT IN HIS ACTIONS. HE WANTED TO FEEL JOY OF LIFE, NOT OF THE MATERAIL WORLD. HE WAS DEEP AND I UNDERSTOOD HIM MORE AS I GOT OLDER. HE WAS NEVER ON AN EGO TRIP. NEVER A SNOB. WISH HE WAS MORE OUT THERE FOR OTHERS TO SEE HIS GREATNESS. VERY SPIRITUAL INDEED. BEAUTIFUL MAN WITH A GREAT SOUL. DIED TOO YOUNG. LENNON ALSO. THE BEATLES LOVED.

  • Yeah, I never thought George was much of a musician.

    He was a nice guy, well...sometimes. Hell, I don't know

    what was bothering this guy. I think he was depressed.

    I mean...he talks all this shit about "Krishna" and his

    "Sweet Lord" and then this guy smokes himself to death

    and lives in a 120 room house! Never mind his mediocre

    music. I mean, let's face it, this guy was NO John Lennon!

  • @TwoUselessLegs YOU'RE NO MUSICAN! HE WAS WAY MORE DEEP THAN SOMEONE LIKE YOU COULD UNDERSTAND. GEORGE WAS WAY WAY TOO NICE, YET THAT WAS HIW STYLE. KRISHNA IS NOT SHIT, NOR IS LOVE, UNLESS FAKE. HE SMOKED WHEN HE WAS YOUNG. HE WAS MELLOW COMPARED TO JOHN, & JUST A DIFFERENT PERSONALITY. YOU WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND. HE WAS NO WAY DEPRESSED. DAMN ,YOU ARE SO WAY OFF AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HIS JOURNEY. THIS GUY, AS YOU REFER GEORGE, UNDERSTOOD MORE IN HIS DREAMS THAN YOU WILL IN YOUR LITTLE LIFE.

  • @GOLDENFLYWARRIOR - Ironically, folks in social networks ignore people who write in CAPS. I didn't read your rant but little matter. Anybody that argues that George Harrison is in the same league as John Lennon isn't worth listening to anyway.

  • BEATLE- LIGHT!

  • Poor George. Always so bitter and resentful. He TRIES

    to live up to his "quiet" Beatle THING...but that's only a

    myth. His new documentary (his ONLY documentary)

    seems to be going down in flames. It skipped the theaters

    and went straight to cable TV. I feel more sorry for Scorcese

    than Harrison. At least with Harrison you expect him to fail.

    I would say watching his film is like watching PAINT DRY

    but at least with paint...you get a little color and a LOT more

    personality!

  • george has lost all the hair and beard ,he looks like he did as a kid!

  • most underrated artist of all time....love u george ....forever...

  • I love when George talks...Just makes me happy... I don't know why, it just does.

  • Comment removed

  • i bet john choose jimi hendrix over gorge in heven

  • @afroman1ish ........im betn your a dick...oh shit i win...

  • Why are most of his interviews out of sync? Someone fix this...

  • george harrison for president of the world...oh..hang on...shame that.

  • RIP George and John

  • @MrTomb789 looks like michal jackson, nice eye triming \ and looks like a 99%

  • sadden by his departure RIP 

  • a hit record is love lost or gained in between the age of 13 and 21.. How true..

  • Poor George! Even in death he can't get any respect! My god, what does a guy have to do to prove he's the same as John Lennon and Paul McCartney? Stealing music from the Chiffons is no excuse to disrespect the moody ex-Beatle!

  • @CubanCheGuevara he was never stolen this,he had great talent and btw you nednt hide for other nick frghtwolf

  • ATTENTION ROOM: The controversial bronze statue of the Beatles in Mersey Park in Liverpool may soon have George Harrison added to it. Seems that city leaders and artist "Jorge Villa De Espinoza" FORGOT to put George into the "Fab Four" back in 1972. Mayor NIgel Inginson said that "it would be too expensive to ADD George. Besides, who would notice he was missing"? Yoko Ono agreed to fund the project provided they put HER into the statue as well.

  • I Love George, Thumbs up if you want him back :(

  • I would suggest you all IGNORE Frightenedpoodle, he's nothing more then a jealous little TROLL who ruins every George Harrison video he posts on. His "anti-disabled" slurs and racist comments should be spammed and forwarded to YouTube. He's an uneducated trailer trash meth head who lives in his moms trailer in Florida.

  • I love George but was there ever a time when he wasn't so mopey?

  • @Lightner445555555555 what does mopey mean?

  • @mastermuppet71 mopes, depressed spirits; blues.

  • There shouldn't be a dislike button on any George Harrison videos..

  • Where are all the George demos??

  • Some of you are dumber than a box of rocks!!! "All Things Must Pass" is the best post Beatles solo album. Then if you want to fight against "Plastic Ono Band", "Ram",. "McCartney", "Imagine", and "Band On the Run". I vote for McCartney 3-2 for Paul. BTW DID YOU NOTICE THAT GEORGE HARRISON WAS PLAYING LIVE AS TRIBUTE TO ONE OF HIS IDOLS BEFORE HE PASSED, CARL PERKINS!?!?!? Carl Perkins!!!! Morons!!!

  • Comment removed

  • Way Better songwriter then Paul how about that

  • I completely disagree with those who keep saying that George was not a great songwriter in the Beatles. His songs on the last albums were brilliant. Have the songs on All Things Must Pass (including that song) were written while he was still in the Beatles. John and Paul would only let him have one song per record. So it wasn't that he wasn't writing great songs, we just never had a chance to hear them until ATMP.

  • With the Beatles he was not a great songwriter. His disadvantage was that John & Paul were naturally gifted, as musicians and writers.

    George had to work hard and learn a lot during the Beatles time.

    At the end and after the Beatles he was on the same level like John & Paul.

    He wrote history as George Harrison & as a Beatle.

    Just listen to his triple Album 'All Things Must Pass' and you will understand.

    Love & Peace

  • @John91040 I have to disagree with you there. During the Beatles era, John and Paul were constantly battling over who would get more of the spotlight and publicity. They were both big fame whores. George was never like that, even up to his dying day. As Olivia Harrison stated, George "never let fame outshine his truth". And you should listen to George's albums such as Cloud Nine and you will see just how much of gifted musician he was.

  • @John91040 Unlike Lennon, Harrison was never out to seek fame or fortune, he was simply there to figure out who he was, and what his purpose was. 

  • HEY EVERYONE. i have a good idea

    LETS ALL STOP TALKING TO KAALEC. he's obviously just gonna keep trying to convince of things that are untrue with his false 'facts'

    just shut up asshole.

  • George was fantastic on early rock n roll – those great twangy lead breaks. And although his singing and songwriting ability grew exponentially, George was never a great lead, rock guitarist. He was also excellent at acoustic blues like the original southern bluesmen of the 20s and 30s. He knew where his musical roots were which is what made him so brilliant.

  • Riddinghood- I liked George's harmonies. He blended well.

    His Greek Chorus work on "Help" is wonderful. Still, you

    confuse the BARNACLE for the SHIP. Musically, he was

    challenged. His guitar work, shrill. His voice, never SOLO

    quality. His lyrics, awkward. His melodies, like shoes in a

    dryer. Ker Plunk! Ker Plunk! Now that he's dead the industry

    hails him as a "genius". The Beatles tried to squeeze money

    out of John's old cassettes...now they turn to George! Next

    year, RINGO's music!

  • @FrlghtWolf

    oh common!!! you can't be serious!!!!! so you saying that just

    because he's dead, he gets overpraised? that might be with

    some people, but some people actually deserve the praise.

    he was musically changed? his guitar work is shrill? may I

    remind George is considered to be one of the best guitarists ever.

    Once again, I have listened to many kinds of music, know George

    Harrison's work. It is completely ridiculous to make it seem like

    George Harrison had little or no talent.

  • @FrlghtWolf

    Also George Harrison was 26, when the beatles were done.

    26!!! ridiculous. He got married at 22. How many people have that

    accomplished by the time they are 26? Not to mention that he

    released All things must pass soon after, which is considered to

    be a genius piece of work. Paul and John had nothing to do with that

    album, so there goes your "musically challenged" and "shrill" theory.

    I truly think you're just jealous of his talent, success, and looks.

  • @ridding -You MUST know that the bulk of All Things Must Pass

    consists of material the Beatles rejected. The biggest "hit" turned

    out to be PLAGIARIZED. Some of these tunes were polished and

    re-polished by George for OVER 10 YEARS. Other pieces, in their

    early stages, had the reluctant help of John and Paul. John and

    Paul had "nothing to do with that album"? 10 years, 30 songs, help

    from the Beatles? He BETTER have a hit or two! You're passionate,

    but you are not intellectually honest.

  • @FrlghtWolf

    Yes, I do know that fact? So what? They're great songs. It was

    very selfish on John and Paul's part to not consider them for

    an album. George had plenty of songs written, not just 30. Paul

    and John just refused to record many on the albums, which really hurt George,

    because they were good songs (as shown by the All things must pass success).

    He DID have a hit actually. As your theory of John and Paul helping George, like

    George didn't contribute to the songs of Paul and John?

  • @FrlghtWolf

    Of course John and Paul helped George in the beginning, but George

    also helped John and Paul tremendously with ideas and the way

    he played the guitar on the songs. Like I said, they are all great.

    To say that any beatles has little or no talent is ridiculous, and I

    am very familiar with their music (both solo and group). The amount

    of good songs all of them composed says so much about how

    gifted they all were.

  • whats not to like about george ? <3

  • he..looks..like..a..vampire..2­..me..=D

  • @Frightwolf ummmm, first of all your whole " not talented but lucky" scheme is actually completely wrong. After making a few million dollars in the beetles he honestly didn't do much afterwards. He wrote a few LP's but he really just kept to himself. I can sing just as good as any of the famous stars out there, the reason I haven't made a fucking penny off of it is because I haven't tried too. He got off his ass and tried to do what he does best. So stop talking shit about that he's a "minor st

  • 3:20 bob dylan quote owwwww yeeeeeeeeeeahhhhhhhhhhh

  • @karmeronic - Take a look at the Y/T video titled:"George

    Harrison Talks About Paul McCartney". This is one bitter

    man. Hardly the "spiritual" and "quiet" Beatle he and his

    fans would have you believe. Mind you, I think it might be

    true. Paul McCartney is/was a jerk. However, that doesn't

    explain why George stabbed his colleague in the back in

    a PUBLIC FORUM. If he's so "spiritual"...what does it

    matter now? Why say ANYTHING? I swear, the man is a

    fake! Never mind his120-room mansion!

  • Well, from his voice ambiance; or colour, one can hear he is a genuine man...solid character,,

    ed

    w w w eddy nu

  • Rich, bored and sceptical 

  • The luckiest man who ever lived. In another time and place, this guy would have made a fine grocery clerk or postal delivery man. That he stumbled onto two of the greatest rockers in history elevated his mediocrity to ever lasting fame.

  • @FrlghtWolf he didn't exactly "stuble onto" them. Paul kindof stumbled onto John, and the partnership grew between. Paul had known George for quite a few years before that, having gone to the same school. Paul knew George could play. The Luckiest man would've been Ringo..

  • @byemynameishi - Ringo knows his place. George never did. George went to his grave bitter and resentful, convinced his music was never accepted in the same manner as Lennon and McCartney, a victim of some conspiracy. Not many of us would have the balls to think of ourselves as equal to the likes of Lennon and McCartney George thought he was. He hid behind the goofy shroud of Hare Krishna to mask his pettiness. He had stood so close to the gods that after a while...he confused himself for one.

  • @FrlghtWolf you're an ass, for the most part I think his music was just as great as lennon/mccartney, especially after the split.

    you have no idea what you're talking about. While what you're saying could have some substance to it, no one but George could know that.

    Religion is a great part of life. If you are as devoted as George was, it can be amazing. don't say he was "hiding" behind his religion. that's just stupid.

    To say he was standing close to gods is a little bit over the top.

  • @FrlghtWolf they weren't gods and they never said they were. they were just two guys with some talent.

    Not to mention that all of this has nothing to do with what I was trying to say. You said that George "stumbled" onto Paul and John - and he didn't!

    Ringo was very lucky to even have ended up in the Beatles! There are a million reasons why Ringo could have been replaced with someone else! (like he was temporarily during the Australia tour)

  • @byemynameishi - Of course they weren't "gods". There's

    no such thing as "god". He framed himself as "spiritual" and

    "quiet" when he was neither. A man who puts himself on a

    lofty pedestal can expect some extreme examination,

    especially in death. What's troubling about George was his

    hypocrisy. He preached against the evils of MATERIALISM

    all the while living in a 120-room mansion. He bitterly

    complained about FAME but then, used FAME to make

    millions! He was lucky, not "talented".

  • @FrlghtWolf exactly, there's no talent in him.

  • @FrlghtWolf whatever, my point is clearly lost on you. what you just said had nothing to do with what we were saying earlier.

  • @byemynameishi - I suspect your point isn't particularly "lost". It's just located in a place fiercely protected from opposite opinions. Why does Harrison attract this kind of fan? You don't see this kind of weak-minded silliness on Lennon sites?

  • @FrlghtWolf OH MY GOD WHATEVER. YOUR JUST REPEATING SOMETHING STUPID. my point is lost on you because you're not listening to it! it doesn't even matter! what you think about george and what i think about george doesn't matter, i'm just saying that in my opinion, you haven't checked your facts out well enough and have no right to be insulting him so.

    you're last sentence made no sense, and by the way, I'm a bigger lennon fan than I am of harrison's, and lennon was an asshole. so just shut up.

  • @byemynameishi - Here are some "facts". On the anniversary

    of John Lennon's death, the media was saturated with TV news

    stories, documentaries, movies, newspaper articles, retrospectives,

    photo essays and concerts. For several weeks it was a non-stop

    Lennon stories. Now, on the anniversary of George Harrison's

    death, what did we see? A whisper! My god, it's as if the man never

    existed! I'll quit bringing Harrison DOWN if you stop trying to MAKE

    him into something he was NOT!

  • @FrlghtWolf MY GOD, a whisper! so how does that make him lucky? I'm not trying to make him into something he's not you dolt -,o . Lennon was in the news alot more because he WANTED to be. he died about 2 months after coming into the press after a 5 year absence, plus he was a peace activist and loved by millions! Harrison was a quiet guy!

    this started with you saying he was the luckiest guy ever for bumping into these two guys called John and Paul. I don't even understand your point anymore.

  • @byemynameishi - George Harrison was a lot of things but

    he was NEVER "quiet". One of those myths that went "viral"

    long before there was such a term. George very much wanted

    the attention He just wasn't equipped to get it. He didn't have

    the good looks of McCartney or the WIT and charm of Lennon.

    More importantly, his music was, for the most part, ill conceived.

    Clunky lyrics, rinky-dink melodies plagued most of his works.

    You mistake Harrison's inability to express himself as "quiet".

  • @FrlghtWolf Yes he wasnt quiet,but surely he wasnt attention,and sorry he hadnt charm or good looks?? LOL,He had these things more then John or Paul

  • @bye - As for "luck", my friend, almost ANY ONE OF US

    could've replaced George. Yes, I believe that. Like winning

    the lottery, Harrison's association with the Beatles was not

    owing to talent but to luck. His two or three great songs owe

    their greatness to luck and the artistic osmosis. If you or I

    worked with the likes of George Martin and the others we

    would also have 3 or 4 "hits"! Never mind that rumors

    persist that McCartney or Lennon helped him on these

    songs. Talk about LUCK!

  • @FrlghtWolf

    I completely agree with @bye on this one. 3 or 4 hits!!?? In your dreams.

    Even if he only had 3-4 hits (and he actually has a lot more), that would

    already be pretty good. Lots of people don't even have that. Anyone could

    be George Harrison? So you're saying anyone could have written the All things

    must pass album, one of the most successful albums ever?? lol

  • @riddinghood3 - How are you defining "hits"? Are you

    willing to compare "Crackerbox Palace" to "Penny Lane"

    or "A Day In The Life"? What are the odds of having two

    geniuses in a band? Now that George is dead and gone,

    courtesy and the marketing department at Apple would

    like us to believe there is suddenly a 3rd "genius". When

    Ringo is dead, I'm confident people like you will be posting

    what a musical genius HE was! John and Paul's music was

    SO GOOD, it didn't matter who George was.

  • @FrlghtWolf

    actually, that's the whole point. because paul and john were such

    geniuses, no one could believe that george was one too, since, statistically,

    it is almost impossible. but he really was. And I don't think that just because some

    Apple company wants me to believe that. I actually listened to almost every beatle song

    and almost every george harrison song to date, and made that conclusion. so there.

    you still don't get it, do you?

  • @riddinghood3 I am a fan of George's middle work – Here Comes the Sun up through his first couple of solo albums. I think his (and Ringo's) contribution to the success of the Beatles and the Beatles sound was profound. But I wouldn't call him a genius. The reason why a lot of George's work didn't show up on Beatles records is that Lennon & McCartney's were better. I tend to agree with much of what FrightWolf is saying. Not all of it, but a pretty big chunk of it.

  • @Kaalec

    George's work didn't show up, because it wasn't as good as Lennon and McCartney? First of all, even McCartney stated to Lennon that now "George's work is as good as ours". Second, why do u think All Things must pass did so well? It's because his great songs weren't put on the album!!! Finally, as far as FrightWolf, have you seen what he said about Harrison? something like he has no talent?!!! and that he's not spiritual because he's rich? are u serious?!!!

  • @riddinghood3 If you read my post, you'll see that I think George was a wonderful, at times, brilliant musician. But as a songwriter, he is not in the same league as Lennon & McCartney. Think of all the timeless classics they wrote. How many of George's will stand up? A few. I have heard him make some very nasty remarks about John and Paul that didn't seem particularly spiritual. But that just make him human.

  • @Kaalec

    Maybe in the beatles, george harrison didn't have as many classics, but are you forgetting about after the group disbanded? I find george harrison's solo works filled with many great tunes and more enriching than paul and john's. and remember that george's guitar work improved many of the songs paul and john wrote. no wonder so many people describe him as underrated.

  • @riddinghood3 That's the thing about music. We can agree that George, John and Paul were all talented songwriters, but which one is best is purely subjective. I love a lot of George's songs and I detest many of Paul's (post-Beatles) and a couple of John's (with the Beatles and after). Overall, I prefer John and Paul, but that's my taste. I regret having supported frightwolf in any way because he was also trashing Paul and John on other pages. He's just another boring internet troll.

  • @FrlghtWolf

    also I don't understand why you keep putting george harrison down?

    you seem to like john and paul so much. they are all great musicians, you know, but

    you seem to think that the beatles were all john and paul. george and ringo

    contributed plenty and influenced the beatles music as well. they were all good.

    there's no need to put any beatle down! seriously. if it wasn't was any four of them,

    the group wouldn't exist!!

  • @riddinghood3 - Ringo was replaced for 3 weeks on

    an early tour. Many fans didn't even notice. Being much

    younger, in the early years, George simply deferred to

    the others. In the early years, George and Ringo were

    largely just SUPPORT. George Martin grimaced

    whenever George brought him a new song. It

    wasn't until the END that George started showing

    some brilliance. By then, it was too late. Just as a

    practical matter, George simply didn't matter during

    MOST of the Beatle legacy.

  • @FrlghtWolf I never heard biggest stupidity,George still knew what he wanted,he hadnt any pettiness,and why he would confussed himself??hence he believe in God??

  • uncle george, i still cant believe that you died exactly 9 years ago, your still living in me

    Love you, you were awesome

  • 'some sort of deeper strength?'

    - how about deeper pockets?

    that can buy anything in the world,

    - i bet we'd all be much more peaceful, having the checkbook of an ex-beatle,?

  • George riposa in pace..

  • George always had an answer for everything.

    Always had an opinion in which is expressed

    with such honesty and eloquence. It's really admirable.

  • I think they are working on his "BOX" of demos but will wait until we are all half dead and are looking for the past to save us.

  • The most beautiful man I have ever seen. I really do love him. It's a horrible feeling loving someone so much that you can never really physically see or touch or hold or kiss. It's very sad.

  • no matter what age he is his still so shyish and boyish cutish... i love him... r.i.p loved beatle george...

  • RIP George. A good man.

  • What a great guy

    sure do miss ya

  • WHY THE FUCK ARE ALL OF GEORGE'S INTERVIEWS OUT OF SYNC!!!

  • @superfob54 The vids are always out of sync - cos George was always ahead of the times

  • @superfob54 your right, all of his interveiws are out of sync

  • @superfob54 dont watch it just listen buy it is anoyeing

  • george was a gentleman,very nice guy.

  • go george! we all love ya!

  • george harrison was and always be my favorite of the beatles

  • I love his honesty, and laughing about eric clapton,saying we shared a wife.He said they were friends and would always be.

  • have u ever seen his son a clone

  • @SUNMAYDEN518 omg i know right?

  • @SUNMAYDEN518 Yes, he does look just like him. He played in a concert on PBS honoring George.

  • The trembling leaves, the warm golden beams through the window shows there was life, air that he breathed, what a blessed time!!!

  • Why do people want to say this Beatle was better than that Beatle? It's all over here there and everywhere. They were and still are great...ALL FOUR OF THEM.

  • What happened to the part where he says "I don't have a toilet that sings 'Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds' that costs thirty-nine dollars or whatever."

  • i think he made himself look like a right cunt when he turned all religious, ringo hated him

  • Comment removed

  • OOHHH...GEORGIE....

    OMG

  • @thehomefront Hahahaha George Harrison was one of the best guitar players EVER, and he was a Beatle who happened to write "Something" and "Here Comes The Sun".... Those are probably two of the best songs of all time. Although he wasnt much of a writer, he was a hell of a lot better of a guitar player than Paul or John.

  • harrison seemed such a down to earth, decent guz, and it is sad to see how we was always harassed by lifes stupidity, from the my sweet lord trial over the stabbing attack to the guitar affair in new york hospital.!

  • Nice interview. Thanks for putting this on the Tube.

  • At 6:00 he says, he could have done WITHOUT everything else, APART from the India experience.

    He is stating that the India experience is the thing he could NOT have done without.

    Mark

    Liverpool

    UK

  • at minute 6:00, is he saying....the one thing he could have done without, was indian music?

  • quite the opposite, he says that he could have done without everything else except the Indian thing.

  • that's what I would have thought. but i'm hearing it the opposite. strange.

  • finally! an interviewer who was respectful, didn't interrupt him, and asked the right questions. she mentioned his deeply spiritual side and his love for gardening instead of just "Beatles Beatles Beatles". don't get me wrong though, i love the Beatles, there was just SO much more to him.

  • he still hand-some man!

  • porque tuviste que envejecer

    te hubieras quedado joven y vivo para la eternidad

  • George Harrison is the fucking man!

  • rip gorge Harrison concert for gorge was the best epically wah wah and old brown shoe, isn't it a pity and my sweet lprd

  • you can see why john altman ( nick cotton) played him in the film about the beatles.

    George got burgled in the mid 90s and him and his wife attacked the burglars with pots and pans

  • R.I.P George :(

    this amazing man will live on forever through out his music and his fans.

  • Wow!!!!!

  • He was so HOTT !

  • Top Bloke and will live forever. Birmingham bands were cool - ELO

    None of the band from the 60's liked football - FACT.

    George was brilliant.

  • George has been my favorite since the very beginning. He is an inspiration and one of my idols. Regretably I've never met him, but I love him as if he were family. God bless him.

  • I like his comment about someone overbudding his demos. Interesting foreshadowing of the Beatles making of Free as a Bird and Real Love in the 1990s.

  • Suprise, Suprise! Yet another comment about George Harrison by MasterJack Aubrey Yawn!! Boring !

  • CubanCheGuevara MasterJackAubrey are full of shit starting a rumour that isn't true as they have a hard-on for Harrison- my buddy is an agent at CAA and teh Scorcesse film is on

  • dont they have good enough directors in brittania to do that documentary why ask american horror movie people to do it? scorcese attempts harrison.......has a horrible ring if you ask me.

  • Scorcesse is one of teh greatest directors of all time-He made the recent Dylan documentary and it was amazing plus he made the greatest rock movie of all-The Last Watz and its on BTW despite the angy underemployed wankers spreading rumours below :)

  • i think George, John, RIngo, and Paul are all legends. but all it is, is just opinions from people who never even met them, and knew them as people. so i dont think we should be saying which beatle was "better" than the others.

  • what about ringo

  • Forget that Documentary, im from Liverpool and the only Beatle worth mentioning is George .. Paul is the polished, nicey nice business man, John is the guy that preached love and never gave a shit about Julian .. Nobody in Liverpool is fooled by the propaganda, George is the only Legend from the Beatles, hes one of us, he was just like any of us and he always recognised that, not like the ego-maniacs that are Paul and John, who thought they were oh so important ..

  • The Beatles were the most adored sought after 22 y/o's on the planet. But they never forgot their working class ethics and despite some unavoidable arrogance, their soul searching good nature. They never trashed hotel rooms over wrong colored M&M's. "Down to earth" has little to do with wealth or posessions. Sure they weren't perfect - they made human mistakes. Sure they fought, they made up - like families do. Their lives were unreal, not summed up by some "news" you read.

  • 593OLY- George lived in an opulent 120 room mansion called "Friar Park". Owned an exotic $800 million car collection. Purchased a huge swath of ocean side property in Hawaii, then...shut off access to the coast from the natives which got him sued. He went to his grave deeply bitter about the way his music was ignored by the Beatles and the public. How is this "down to earth"?

  • He was not deeply bitter at all, he would talk about it when asked in interviews... and his music was definitely not ignored.

  • @MasterJackAubrey down to earth doesnt mean how you,or where you live,or how maney money you have,means down to earth it is how you act,your behaviour...There is lot of people what are poor,but they arent down to earth by them behaviuor COMPRENDE

  • he surely dont went bitter,he went calm,and in piece,this is just your sick brain,I dont let offens this amazing,georgeous man,HEAR ME??

  • You probably arent such rich as he was,but you arent down to earth,like was,cuse you act like idiot and snob

  • George was the nicest most down to earth Beatle of them all,and the one I would have liked to meet. His music will last forever - R.I.P George.

  • 593OLYMPUS - No disrespect intended, but George lived in an opulent 120 room mansion called "Friar Park". Owned an exotic $800 million car collection. Purchased a huge swath of ocean side property in Hawaii, then...shut off access to the coast from the natives which got him sued, even by environmentalists. He went to his grave deeply bitter about the way his music was ignored by the Beatles and the public. He might've been "down to earth", but he was often NOT very "nice".

  • Wow, I didn't know any of that about George. Do you have any cites for any of that?

  • Danjanon -George's estate was called Friar Park and boasted over 100 rooms, several thousand acres and a lake. His $800 million car collection was sold by Olivia in 2005 to cover some of George's considerable debt. His Hawaiian problems started when he illegally shut off access to miles of coast-line to everyone, including families that had lived there for THOUSANDS of years. As for bitterness towards the other Beatles, check out Youtube video titled "George Harrison talks about Paul McCartney".

  • Could you tell me how you got to know this information?? I would very greatly appreciated it

  • th3b3- This is collective information, culled from the books, articles, documentaries and music magazines written about the Beatles for years. Whatever you do, do not read autobiographies. Few of us, especially ex-Beatles, are able to write honestly about their own lives. George Harrison and Paul McCartney were particularly bad about this.

  • So, no cites then?