For all who like to debate this film without watching all the episodes; I will not continue discussions; until you actually have watched all the episodes and can answer satisfactorily one question; why did those towers collapse in less than 10 seconds, when the laws of physics dictate they should have taken over 90 seconds to fall!?! Remember; all the floors underneath were still structurally solid, and should have offered firm resistance; according to physicists and structural engineer experts!
@roquefortfiles I'd recommend watching all ten segments of this video; before making a knee-jerk remark, that doesn't take all the data into account...you are reflecting the type of mindset which the "new world order" is trying to create, with misinformation that flies in the face of the actual facts, as well as the laws of physics. Do the homework...then I think you'll "get it"
I have an idea. Why don't you guys over there in USA haul Bush's, Rumsfelt's Rice's and whoever elses collective ass in front of the supreme court or whatever the highest court in your countryis called, get them under oath, swearing on the bible and get them to tell the truth. Seems pretty simple to me.
Free fall speed is very simple. If, you ignore air resistance, you can then take the distance traveled (height of the buildings), divide by 16 and then take the square root and you have your free fall speed. The fact that in both of these towers, the entire building is being ripped to pieces at the same speed the debris is falling from the top. People say 'concrete wasn't pulverized an', and its like, um R U DUMB, LMAO, it was in mid-air the entire structures, UM DUH LIKE THE DUST CLOUDS lol
By the way. I don't care for Obama. I think you have a real problem on your hands and you need to get him out of office as soon as possible. I wouldn't have voted for him..and it's not because he's black.Sybel Edmonds...what does she do now? I'd be curious to here history at FBI. sometimes there are huge back stories to the front story.Was there anything out of the ordinary..like some disciplinary action and she was disgruntled?These are things you must consider. I would want to see her record
the federal government about 9/11 so extensively as to warrant a new and truly independent investigation, which is a point that has been overwhelmingly proven over and over again. You're correct that someone could post information anonymously on the internet, but without authentication of source, no one would believe it. Without a credible journalist to stand by the story, no one would take it seriously. And no journalist (not even the very few good ones) would put their neck on the line for
an unverified online source that could be a teenager pranking them for all they know. Internet or not, sources still need to be just as verifiable now as they did 40 years ago, in order to be credible by journalistic standards. Your statements regarding the "hijackers" is supported by the assumption that the were more than merely patsies. Many have argued that their ridiculous behavior at the flight schools (their instructors have gone on record saying they don't see how Hanyur could have
piloted that airbus into the pentagon), obnoxious behavior at strip clubs.. was meant to attract attention to them. It's not uncommon for intelligence services to employ individuals to take part in drills and other exercises. This is a possible explanation for some of the hijackers (at least 6 of whom have come out publicly, stating that they're still alive, by the way). Rather than being idle speculation, this is a very critical line of inquiry that SHOULD have been addressed by the
Airbus? To my knowledge it was a 757. I also think the pilot school instructors were speculating. I 've worked with complete idiots..but when they had to get something done...they DID.
I used the term airbus as a general term to describe a large aircraft, not as an actual description of the literal model of aircraft, and yes you're correct it was a 757. The flight instructors, having had direct experience attempting to instruct certain of the alleged hijackers, cannot be said to be speculating, but to be giving their opinion regarding Hanyur's skills. So now you're saying that people who are incompetent can suddenly become competent? Seems to run counter to your previous
remarks about 9/11 being an inside job, being too "complex" to have been pulled off. Again, I simply disagree about the issue of accountability on youtube. I think the increase in voices being heard actually increases the total amount of credibility, as there are more independent criticisms available of just about any topic. I agree with you that most of what's on youtube is as you say, purely misinformation, but can you give me of an example of a medium for which that isn't true? Isn't most
of what's on television also uncredible and full of misinformation (think Fox News, or NPR)? While someone's opinion expressed on youtube is completely uncensored or edited (except for obscenity), they still need to support their claims and opinions with facts if they want anyone to take them seriously. The mere fact that I am using youtube right now does not automatically make me more prone to believing uncorroborated, baseless things. "shooting the messenger" is a cop out intended by most
people as a way to divert the subject from the issue itself, which is that the crime of 9/11 clearly has not transpired in the way that we were told it did, by our government.
So tired of people using the "youtube is your source?! how ridiculous!" This is one of the dumbest things you can say because clearly youtube is what you make of it, meaning that if you wana watch hampsters play piano you can, and if you want to watch documentaries or news clips, you can do that too. Really, it totally depends on how YOU choose to use youtube. Youtube videos have sources just like anything shown on television. If it's from ABC it says so. If it's from the AP it says so.
The problem with that is...many people post what they want..and call it a fact or a truth..when it is not. Then someone...who doesn't know any better sees it and propagates it as fact. There is NO accountability or social responsibility on YT. That is the problem. Anyone..and I MEAN anyone can post. IN FACT corporations have posted videos that they intended to influence people on YT and say that they are by one person..but they have THEIR own Monetary agendas. JUST ask AL GORE and HIS PENGUINS.
They just arrested a group of punk kids who were going around tackling people unexpectedly, and a bunch of other cheap pranks. They were identified and are now facing charges. So I disagree that there's no accountability. I don't believe that there's any social responsibility on television, or radio, or print, or anywhere else, really.. which is the whole point. Youtube is simply a medium on which to post all other media. It is what you make it, plain and simply. It's the viewer's
You have mistaken what I said. I'm not talking about the outside REAL world. I'm only talking about YT. It is MOSTLY based on amatuers posting whatever...as FACT There is some good stuff on here..but you have to take a lot of time to sift through the garbage to find it. I bet I could make a movie and post it on here..and be a rave of profoundness and ridicule at the same time...but get notoriety..based on speculation and allegations. .. Does that sound like it's a responsible thing to do?
responsibility to fact check while watching a youtube video just as it is when watching a national geographic documentary. People don't suddenly become more stupid and unable to discern between shit and shinola, just because they're on a site called youtube. It's a childish argument to try to hide behind the perceived illegitimacy of youtube, rather than addressing any of the points being made during the film. The claim of there being no evidence is also ridiculous. Google Dr. Steven Jones
and his research regarding the presence of nano-thermite in the dust debris from 9/11. So far his findings have been corroborated by at least 9 other physicists. Also there's the massive amount of insider trading that took place directly before the terror attacks. These are just two examples from volumes of evidence. This evidence is not about determining who DID perpetrate the attacks. That's getting ahead of ourselves. First we have to deal with the obvious fact that the official story
I was using THERMITE in 1978. YOU CANT cut with it. That's not what it was designed for. That's great that there was insider trading..but that's not really evidence..unless you can PROVE a connection. You are specuating that is evidence. But that is minuscule to all the other things that would have to happen and be in place with out rehearsal or back up plan. I don't buy it. That's just yours and others THEORIES. PROVE it. What are the physics names??
NANO-thermite has been found in the debris. Nano-thermite is the military grade form of thermite. Thermite is like a firecracker going off, compared to it's much more potent military form. Research it if you don't believe me. I've given you the name of physicist Stephen Jones, I don't intend to do your research for you, I'm sure you can find the others on google. The insider trading was massive, and it is most certainly evidence in proving that case AGAINST the official story, not FOR any
other version of it. Also, as I stated before, I can only scratch the surface of how much evidence there truly is. I have not posed any theory, so I'm not sure what it is you're asking me to prove. All I've done is presented THE VERY BEGINNING of evidence and information that clearly indicates the inaccuracy of the official story. Colin Powell promised that the evidence proving al qaeda's involvement would be available to the public and presented in a court of law. 8 years later, this
I asked what their names were so I can look at their research..and ascertain what methods they used to gather their information and what their credentials are as well as many other things. I take nothing I read on here at face value. So far you are just repeating what you heard somewhere else. That doesn't make any of it a fact or even true. I still want to see it all put together and proven..not just talked about on YT..
hasn't happened. So I could easily be just as demanding of you to prove that al qaeda did it, since that seems to be your theory of the events. Any prosecutor or law enforcement officer knows that a good way to solve a crime is to rule suspects OUT. Which is exactly what can be done, regarding the theory that al qaeda SINGLHANDEDLY perpetrated the attacks. It's a fairytale. A rag tag group of terrorists were not able to neutralize the most sophisticated air defense system in the world.
again speculation. Here's what I do know. WHAT operation would chance training people to fly small aircraft and live in a house in FLA?? IT would make more sense to train them on actual 757 on a base or friendly nation outside the continental of the US and then fly straight in bypassing airports and other peoplethus minimizing the chance of comprise. NOW that would make more sense. NO military planner would even attempt a stupid plan like that when you have all these other resources available.
They didn't have to neutralize it. NORAD doesn't take notes on every commercial aircraft because quite honestly...there are THOUSANDS of them in the air simultaneously. It was a regular flight out of a know airport. It also takes time to ascertain WTF is going on and what you are dealing with. OR do you suppose we should just shoot down every plane that does something a bit unusual?? For you it is simple. I see the human element. what you are suggesting is EXTREMELY complicated.
One of the only pieces of evidence offered by the government is the so called "smoking gun" video evidence of Osama Bin Laden, but since then, other translations have revealed that the film DOES NOT contain Osama Bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks, and his first statements not only CLEARLY DENY responsibility, but place the blame on certain criminal elements within our own government.
The one thing I should say. I didn't really think that was a smoking gun. I found it a bit more open to interpretation. But what a better way to add insult to injury then say..It wasn't us. It's your own country. LOL. I would say that was planned by Osama...and maybe he was speculating. LOL But that doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist group and that he didn't know about it. Now..if you can prove that. I'll pay attention Otherwise I just hear misinformation and speculation.
My point is not that you should simply believe what Osama Bin Laden says, my point is that what the federal government is telling you about the evidence of Osama Bin Laden in connection with 9/11 is false. Both the F.B.I translation provided to the public, and even the very statement that there was a claim of responsibility on his part is simply false. This is not speculation, it is fact. Unlike your statements about bin laden wanting to "add insult to injury," which is purely speculative.
Oh I agree. I was speculating. That's why I laughed. It never even crossed my mind till that moment and I thought it was funny. But people do have some twisted Ideas and may take advantage of a situation if it presents it self.
No, it doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist group, or that he didn't know about it. Again, it simply demonstrates the obvious flaws, or in my opinion, lies, contained within the government's official explanation of 9/11. Also, there's a huge difference between knowing about a crime and committing it yourself.
I can respect your opinion. The problem I have is when people say..IT IS FACT. that's what pisses me off. You have to be able to prove that Before you make that BOLD ACCUSATION and ALLEGATIONS. otherwise it's just speculation and slander. THAT'S been my whole point. I don't care if there was/is a conspiracy. I just care about the process of covering all the angles..and not just saying it it's a conspiracy ..therefore it is one. That's not FACTUAL..or accurate.
between Intelligence and military, and amongst one another fades away at higher levels of authority, and through compartmentalization, many of these seemingly independent organizations end up working in tandem, probably more than many of them realize.
I work with the govt..and when I'm trying to get something accomplished..it's like pulling out my own teeth to get it done. I like to use the term "it moves at the speed of govt" It's another reason why I don't THINK the conspiracy theory works. Far too complicated. TOO many unnecessary steps in the dance. They could have streamlined the whole thing. Of course..that is my opinion..if there is/was a conspiracy. Just playing the devils advocate.
How could they have streamlined the whole thing? 9/11 wasn't just about dragging America into another illegitimate war, the establishment can do that anytime they wish. The point of 9/11, from their perspective, was to shock and awe the American public into not only supporting war efforts, but to usher in a more oppressive environment here at home, which is exactly what was accomplished with the Patriot Act, now renewed by our "Liberal" president. They wanted another Vietnam, but without the
Ok...stream line it..by..Lets not have these guys training on aircraft they won't be using. Let's take them off continent to a base or friendly country and train on the acyual aircraft they are going to use. Then LETS really pack this things with explosives or whatever. We won't chance them living in a rented home in FLA and talking to people. Why chance them going through an airport and being compromised.. Just fly straight in on commercial routes. TOO many steps to the dance.
pesky freedom of speech or right to assemble aspect of it, which eventually shut down the war machine. This time, that problem would be accounted for. Hence the nightmarish snuff film of 9/11 shown to the American people by the Banker-controlled Media puppets, for the purpose of shocking us into accepting a much more Orwellian state.
By the way...the al gore thing was uncovered by an investigation by the WALL STREET JOURNAL. to get to the bottom of this post on YT. That would be a reputable and accountable organization. Not an amateur on YT
None of you kids have even built a fucking dog house..and you are talking High steel..and what it's design specs are and how it should came down if at all and the proof of explosives. ARE YOU ALL THAT FUCKING IGNORANT. None of you except 'the7train" has any experience with steel structures. he's talking so far over your stupid immature little hormone filled heads that it sounds like a foreign language to you. Watch the vids with out the opinions that go with them. It's structural FAILURE.
From demolition. And from this comment it seems that YOU are just a bit heated and have had to resort to petty, meaningless insults. Yet others are the ignorant ones, not you.
Not demolition.YOU can't proof that because you know nothing about DEMO work. you wouldn't know a demo charge if you were looking at one.Watching a few videos on YT doesn't make you informed or an AUTHORITY on any of it. Someone SAYING it was demo..doesn't make it FACT.YOU NEED irrefutable courtroom evidence PROOF.Here SAY won't cut it.SPECULATION won't cut it. A LAWYER Would hand you your ass. I get angry because of your ignorance and immaturity to the evidence.You can talk on YT all you want
I'm CLEARLY WRONG??. WELL son. AS they say in the court room.WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?. WHAT evidence do YOU have to support this claim?. YOU haven't experienced anything close to what you are claiming. You are making that CLAIM on what if any little bit of life experience you have. YOU are anything but an EXPERT WITNESS. YT the HOME of the AMATEUR. good luck with that.
There is loads of proof backing my point, whereas your point simply have the government seal. Whoopty do: you can believe any/everything the government tells you to. And it seems as though you're getting thumbs down on just about every post you make and I'm getting thumbs up, so I'm not alone.
No! there are loads of speculation and twisted facts and misinformation.that you ACCEPT as proof. It would not fly in a courtroom. You can't corroborate any of it. That's my point. Again..you assume I believe EVERYTHING the gvt says. That isn't true at all. I'm only talking about this particular incident. I also don't care that I am getting thumbs down. The worst people in the world get loyal followers. It doesn't make them RIGHT or ACCURATE. I only suggest you exercise diligence in research.
"It would not fly in a courtroom" because that's THE GOVERNMENT. Dumbass. When I said you believe anything the government said I was referring to 911. And actually: "I only suggest YOU exercise diligence in research."
If you had real evidence that irrefutable..they would have NO choice but to accept it. Clinton can tell you that. But they liked the cheater. . Never the less..when you are trying to substantiate facts and evidence you need to check all other sources to CORROBORATE that evidence as fact and not here say or speculation. No one has done that. That is DUE DILIGENCE. You don't follow through. you just say what you think with nothing behind it. WHO is going to take you seriously???
LOL NO shit shelock. But you aren't going to prove ANYTHING on YOUTUBE. YOU will never get anything to change. You just spew crap and slander. So you actually believe it's that tight of a group do you? Is your family that tight? do you all agree on everything?. The people who work for the POLICE and FIRE and all gvt agencies..are people JUST LIKE YOU. so they are all corrupt..because you say they are?? LOL seriously!! What a stupid thing to say.
You're the one throwing around slander. And it's the court's. They ARE all corrupt. They don't give a fuck about you or I. And don't ever say I'm like a politician; I'm not a lying prick out for myself.
REALLY?WHO did I slander?. I only stated facts. That's not slander. I can substantiate and corroborate what I post. CAN you do that?? I NEVER said there isn't any corruption in the gvt. There is corruption in every industry if you look long enough. Some people have morals, ethics and a conscience. Apparently you think anyone working for the gvt is evil. I don't repeat things I don't know to be true or that I can't authenticate. Thats how the ENQUIRER gets sued for millions every year.
You slammed everybody who doesn't think exactly like you do. It's in all of your posts. And you haven't "substantiate[d] and corroborate[d]" anything you've just yelled (assuming that's what the context of your upper case means which reminds me of Bill O'Reilly when he doesn't have a point: he just yells at his guest). "I don't repeat things I don't know to be true or that I can't authenticate" Actually all you seem to have done is regurgitate what the government say about 911...
...you're exactly what they want. I never sided with anybody I simply said that demolition brought down the twin towers which has substantial proof while the whole "the heat of the jet fuel weakened the steel" bullshit makes no sense at all. I actually THINK about things before I just have verbal diarrhea like you seem to have.
REALLY?. SO..what numbers and facts do you have to go with those SPECULATIONS?. YOU are just saying its a demo..because you don't buy it. NOW go find out how much demo and time and effort it would take to do that. DO ALL of the research..not just being an arm chair sleuth. I know a lot of the numbers and what it takes. FROM EXPERIENCE. YOU have nothing but speculation. Oddly enough..I don't watch much TV..and I wouldn't watch whoever Bill Orielly is. but obviously you do.
I don't believe for ONE second that you don't watch much TV nor don't know who Bill O'Reilly is. Just because I know of somebody does not mean that I regularly watch him. You're not worth any more of my time because you are an absolute moron. Time clearly would not be an issue for the people behind 911. But you believe whatever fantasy you would like to believe.
Actually..it's you who has the FANTASY..and god knows why you would want that kind of fantasy. SERIOUSLY though. I don't know who BILL is. What network is he on?? what's the show called. AND NO...I hardly ever watch TV. I'm too busy with other things...like working in an industry you think I know nothing about. So I challenge you..and you don't like it. ISN'T that the point of YT??
One other point..TIME is a serious issue. The longer it takes to execute...the greater the chance of COMPROMISE. so time is an issue. It would take years to plan out. I just can't see it working..on so many levels. and that's based on personal experience..working with MULTI agency and 1000s of people. They'd fuck it up. It's that simple. It's one thing to say..THATS HOW THEY DID IT. it's another to really make it happen in practice and real time. TOO many unnecessary steps in the dance.
The official story of 9/11 contends that Al Qaeda spent at least 7 years planning the attacks, so the fact that massive planning would have to have been done, is a characteristic of either major theory of 9/11. The "they'd fuck it up argument" is a common one. It's important to remember the Manhattan Project, which employed roughly 48,000 Americans, none of whom spoke one single word about the top secret project until it was declassified. Much of the percieved clashing and butting of heads
short wave radios..?? do you even know what you are talking about.? OMG..stupid stupid stupid.
I'm ashamed to say I am human. you believe any stupid video that someone posts that supports your idiotic theories. This guy should be slapped for propagating misinformation. get a life...hobbiest...scammer. P.O.S.
There has been a few. There was a fairly large one quite a few years ago. I've seen some old file footage of it. What are you getting at? The buildings being built to withstand Hurricanes??
okay this was an inside job..bombs in the building..How did our goverment get these thugs to high jack planes and do this? i thought we didn't like them guys over there and they didn't like us
see...that's the thing. The CONSPIRACY CULT can't answer that question with any logic. In FACT they never even asked themselves that question. They simply can't come up with a LOGICAL answer. It doesn't fit in with their theory...so they ignore the question. I've asked it. I want to KNOW : How did they Indoctrinate Osama.? Why would he be a willing party.? What was he promised or paid? Who arranged this meeting and where did it take place? And that's just the tip of my questions.
REALLY?! AND WHO and/or WHERE did you here that? YOUTUBE.?? LOL Take that into a courtroom as evidence. See what happens. You clearly have never been in a courtroom or had to deal with any major crime or Know anything about explosives,Engineering and numerous other things. That's not an INSULT. I am stating a FACT. You will never get a professional to take your side BECAUSE their INTEGRITY and CREDIBILITY would be DESTROYED. You'll get it when you are older...maybe..or...maybe not.
the floors pancaked one another now the concrete floor of one floor is laying on top of bar joist rated only for a certain load when "healthy not damaged by impact or heat so those two come down on the next then there are 3 on supports made for one and so on. then by the time you get to "undamaged floors the load is too great. and if you watch close it didnt come down "even the whole way - you see sections of the exterior being left behind for a moment then falling in.
Regardless of whether the structure failed from the jet impact, causing the collapse, there is one thing you are not even considering. Which is; the resistance offered by all the remaining undamaged floors of those buildings! Even in a pancake collapse it should have taken considerably longer for those buildings to fall as the floors encountered the solidity of the undamaged portions of those structures, up to a factor of ten times longer for those buildings to fall. They fell as if in thin air!
your explanation is flawed,we all have seen to many modern disaters and how are constuction holds up to it.newtons law does not adhere to how fast they fell.they were demolised by explosives.hell even firemen and police say this on their short wave radios.but i guess those firemen dont know what they are taking about.they know more than any one.they have been shut up the truthis just to evil and hard to understand.2 words control and greed,period.
please tell me? i'd love to know i mean shit ive only been a high steel ironworker my whole friggin adult life. so how come nobody has addressed the statement/question on free fall speed , terminal velocity, shear, load distribution "shock loading" weight distribution etc. fireman fight fires, police enforce the law both resque folks.. that doesnt make them experts on structures or demolition..
But you are using logic...and you are talking to children that still believe in santa clause and live at home with their parents. They barely form complete thoughts yet. Why else would they say some foolish things with out ever having rigged explosives...or built high steel. or maybe even flown in an airliner...or been to NY or the pentagon or even had a JOB.. They are teenagers. that know everything...didn't you know.?? IT"S the CONSPIRACY CULT..and they were recruited.
and even if the building was "designed" to withstand a jet impact... it's some math formulas that really have never been tested. its mostly in truth... speculation .. and theory havent you ever heard of bridge collapse because of an engineering error? its happened.
Volvo goes to great lengths to make the safest car on the road, innovators in safety true? crash test etc but people still get killed in car wrecks driving volvo's now dont they.
Hi there, it's not so much about the plane crashing into the building, as it is about how the buildings fell that is the issue here. If you watched all the episodes, before forming an opinion, you'd understand. Those buildings were brought down with demolitions, there's no rational explaination for the buildings coming down so quickly. It's as if someone waved a "magic wand" & all the undamaged floors below the crash zone simply turned into mush in a cloud of smoke! Now how could that have been?
by the shoe portion of the bar joist that maintains the bearing on beams and spandrels becoming heated NOT melted just overheated failing in "shear " and the "moment "flexing the structural elements used for the "floor stringers were very light weight and the shoe and column clips just have to warp to send it in a chain reaction
OH NO this is the End for all demolition firms we dont need them any more!!
Just make some jet full fires in a couple of floors make a big hole in the wall and cut some of the steal beams off youre free choice (not all of them) dont worry sure the building will not tip offer in one ore other direction and you will have the building symmetrically come down close to freefall speed ... Right?! Its so easy to knock a building down its mind-boggling we wasted all the money for experts!
"close to free fall speed"? and just what is free fall speed ??? whats free fall speed of a bowling ball dropped from 100 stories? whats the free fall speed of a loaf of wonder bread?.. whats terminal velocity? shear ? resistance? the undamaged floors were not designed to accept and distribute the " load" of the upper floors with that much center core damage. the steel members were not huge columns and beams after the 70th floor go do some research look at the prints
Hi there, well for one, the damage to those buildings was not identical, as one plane hit a corner of one tower, and the other hit more central at a different level, so the end result should have been different. You posed several questions here, perhaps you could share some of your "expertise" and the answers to all those points you brought up, that is if you know the answers.....
YOU post awesome questions. They ..the conspiracy cult..never think of those kind of questions...because their parents are still thinking for them. They have NO idea of what goes into the engineering of a building and what happens when it's integrity is compromised.
You are just a little too smart for them...and that will never do. you don't support their theories...so the CULT will try to abolish you from their island. Oh..and they don't think they are in a CULT
Thanks Joe ! geez finally somebody who dares to differ with the wacko's. I cant believe some of the crap they come up with. As soon as you give them some alterative views your labeled a "sheeple".
yeah the "short wave radio" statement really put it over the edge ... dumbass's.
also the bar b q statement they use in ref. to steel failing or misforming " uh duh well how come barbques dont melt then? huh? and another post false info and phoney vids and the others believe it.
It's not a secret you are stupid. Do you know what the U.S GNP is?? Do a little research on that an you'll see some interesting things that don't support your war for oil theory.. WAR is costly. It's costing a lot more then if we just BOUGHT the oil from them. After all..you've already said the U.S. are working with them and staged the WTC. Interesting...suddenly the oil theory doesn't make much sense ..does it. and Neither does the WTC conspiracy.
People are blind, our government is not for it people. We have been control by corrupted politicians. This is the beginning of one world order, Jehovah and Jesus Christ have mercy on our soul this is the beginning of the end. Where in that hell is bin landed? He was working for our government during these events. Hussein was captured even when he hid in that hole.
Hi there, don't get me wrong, I am not stupid enough to point the finger at any one person, or group of people, but am simply pointing out that there are sooooo many anomolies, that a much closer examination of all the facts is warranted! I hope you will be so kind as to take the time to watch all the episodes, one after the other, I set it up so it would be convenient to do so, as all you need do is click the "Video Response" button and it leads seamlessly from one episode to the next. Cheers!
Hi there, thanks so much for taking your valuable time to watch this series! I hope it is useful food for thought for you. I believe that so many people were involved in this conspiracy, that it's just a matter of time before one of those involved "spills the beans". Meanwhile we can simply continue to put all of our heads together and like good detectives eventually unearth enough circumstantial evidence to hopefully begin to point the blame in the direction of the guilty parties involved here!
it's still so sad to me....all the innocent lives lost. i pray for their souls, that they were all in a place of light. WHOEVER? did this will face judgement one day, no matter.
If you have the time, I might suggest that you start with episode one, and follow the entire presentation. Then do some more research on your own. There are a lot of excellent documentaries to have a look at, such as "In Plane Sight" or "911 The road to Tyranny".Of course it would take many people involved to co-ordinate and execute such a plan. Remember, Bush's father was head of CIA for many years, and probably has many loyal operatives willing to do his bidding, with the necessary expertise.
I understand your skepticism, it wasn't easy for me to swallow at first. But if you pay careful attention to what's presented, you see far too many unexplainable anomalies here. I hope you watched all the vids before forming an opinion. Somebody did place explosives ahead of time. Arab terrorists with Saudi money? Explosives WERE used, that fact is inescapable! One cannot void laws of physics because it's inconvenient to your position. More than one person was involved it's called a conspiracy!
Very nice, it amazes me that anyone can believe the "Official story" People dont know how to think for themselves, common sense alone tells you that the way all three of those buildings fell was not due to jet fuel. I also find it extremely obvious~ the use of shills for street interviews immediately after the collapse:(
Yes, but we continue to give them their usualdosage of truth and it gets much easyier. You should have tried telling people 6 years ago. Much much easier today.
Lesli Robinson, the twin tower architect, deserves a good smack.
Seigu007 1 day ago
For all who like to debate this film without watching all the episodes; I will not continue discussions; until you actually have watched all the episodes and can answer satisfactorily one question; why did those towers collapse in less than 10 seconds, when the laws of physics dictate they should have taken over 90 seconds to fall!?! Remember; all the floors underneath were still structurally solid, and should have offered firm resistance; according to physicists and structural engineer experts!
androidstar 6 months ago
@roquefortfiles I'd recommend watching all ten segments of this video; before making a knee-jerk remark, that doesn't take all the data into account...you are reflecting the type of mindset which the "new world order" is trying to create, with misinformation that flies in the face of the actual facts, as well as the laws of physics. Do the homework...then I think you'll "get it"
androidstar 6 months ago
I have an idea. Why don't you guys over there in USA haul Bush's, Rumsfelt's Rice's and whoever elses collective ass in front of the supreme court or whatever the highest court in your countryis called, get them under oath, swearing on the bible and get them to tell the truth. Seems pretty simple to me.
MrMarkjohnT 10 months ago
Free fall speed is very simple. If, you ignore air resistance, you can then take the distance traveled (height of the buildings), divide by 16 and then take the square root and you have your free fall speed. The fact that in both of these towers, the entire building is being ripped to pieces at the same speed the debris is falling from the top. People say 'concrete wasn't pulverized an', and its like, um R U DUMB, LMAO, it was in mid-air the entire structures, UM DUH LIKE THE DUST CLOUDS lol
ryconster 1 year ago
The tops should have fallen, not ALL of the buildings!!
cool3929 1 year ago
and if its cool fire what is it inside a log is a SOLID! gosh REALLY!
gaytacoma 2 years ago
mmmm how much fuel was on it a gallon LOL
gaytacoma 2 years ago
By the way. I don't care for Obama. I think you have a real problem on your hands and you need to get him out of office as soon as possible. I wouldn't have voted for him..and it's not because he's black.Sybel Edmonds...what does she do now? I'd be curious to here history at FBI. sometimes there are huge back stories to the front story.Was there anything out of the ordinary..like some disciplinary action and she was disgruntled?These are things you must consider. I would want to see her record
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
fraudulent 9/11 commission.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago 6
the federal government about 9/11 so extensively as to warrant a new and truly independent investigation, which is a point that has been overwhelmingly proven over and over again. You're correct that someone could post information anonymously on the internet, but without authentication of source, no one would believe it. Without a credible journalist to stand by the story, no one would take it seriously. And no journalist (not even the very few good ones) would put their neck on the line for
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
an unverified online source that could be a teenager pranking them for all they know. Internet or not, sources still need to be just as verifiable now as they did 40 years ago, in order to be credible by journalistic standards. Your statements regarding the "hijackers" is supported by the assumption that the were more than merely patsies. Many have argued that their ridiculous behavior at the flight schools (their instructors have gone on record saying they don't see how Hanyur could have
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
piloted that airbus into the pentagon), obnoxious behavior at strip clubs.. was meant to attract attention to them. It's not uncommon for intelligence services to employ individuals to take part in drills and other exercises. This is a possible explanation for some of the hijackers (at least 6 of whom have come out publicly, stating that they're still alive, by the way). Rather than being idle speculation, this is a very critical line of inquiry that SHOULD have been addressed by the
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
Airbus? To my knowledge it was a 757. I also think the pilot school instructors were speculating. I 've worked with complete idiots..but when they had to get something done...they DID.
Which six were these?
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
I used the term airbus as a general term to describe a large aircraft, not as an actual description of the literal model of aircraft, and yes you're correct it was a 757. The flight instructors, having had direct experience attempting to instruct certain of the alleged hijackers, cannot be said to be speculating, but to be giving their opinion regarding Hanyur's skills. So now you're saying that people who are incompetent can suddenly become competent? Seems to run counter to your previous
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
remarks about 9/11 being an inside job, being too "complex" to have been pulled off. Again, I simply disagree about the issue of accountability on youtube. I think the increase in voices being heard actually increases the total amount of credibility, as there are more independent criticisms available of just about any topic. I agree with you that most of what's on youtube is as you say, purely misinformation, but can you give me of an example of a medium for which that isn't true? Isn't most
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
of what's on television also uncredible and full of misinformation (think Fox News, or NPR)? While someone's opinion expressed on youtube is completely uncensored or edited (except for obscenity), they still need to support their claims and opinions with facts if they want anyone to take them seriously. The mere fact that I am using youtube right now does not automatically make me more prone to believing uncorroborated, baseless things. "shooting the messenger" is a cop out intended by most
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
people as a way to divert the subject from the issue itself, which is that the crime of 9/11 clearly has not transpired in the way that we were told it did, by our government.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
Just do a google search for "9/11 hijackers still alive" and you will have access to all the names, dates, places relevant to the topic.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
So tired of people using the "youtube is your source?! how ridiculous!" This is one of the dumbest things you can say because clearly youtube is what you make of it, meaning that if you wana watch hampsters play piano you can, and if you want to watch documentaries or news clips, you can do that too. Really, it totally depends on how YOU choose to use youtube. Youtube videos have sources just like anything shown on television. If it's from ABC it says so. If it's from the AP it says so.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
The problem with that is...many people post what they want..and call it a fact or a truth..when it is not. Then someone...who doesn't know any better sees it and propagates it as fact. There is NO accountability or social responsibility on YT. That is the problem. Anyone..and I MEAN anyone can post. IN FACT corporations have posted videos that they intended to influence people on YT and say that they are by one person..but they have THEIR own Monetary agendas. JUST ask AL GORE and HIS PENGUINS.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
They just arrested a group of punk kids who were going around tackling people unexpectedly, and a bunch of other cheap pranks. They were identified and are now facing charges. So I disagree that there's no accountability. I don't believe that there's any social responsibility on television, or radio, or print, or anywhere else, really.. which is the whole point. Youtube is simply a medium on which to post all other media. It is what you make it, plain and simply. It's the viewer's
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
You have mistaken what I said. I'm not talking about the outside REAL world. I'm only talking about YT. It is MOSTLY based on amatuers posting whatever...as FACT There is some good stuff on here..but you have to take a lot of time to sift through the garbage to find it. I bet I could make a movie and post it on here..and be a rave of profoundness and ridicule at the same time...but get notoriety..based on speculation and allegations. .. Does that sound like it's a responsible thing to do?
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
responsibility to fact check while watching a youtube video just as it is when watching a national geographic documentary. People don't suddenly become more stupid and unable to discern between shit and shinola, just because they're on a site called youtube. It's a childish argument to try to hide behind the perceived illegitimacy of youtube, rather than addressing any of the points being made during the film. The claim of there being no evidence is also ridiculous. Google Dr. Steven Jones
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
and his research regarding the presence of nano-thermite in the dust debris from 9/11. So far his findings have been corroborated by at least 9 other physicists. Also there's the massive amount of insider trading that took place directly before the terror attacks. These are just two examples from volumes of evidence. This evidence is not about determining who DID perpetrate the attacks. That's getting ahead of ourselves. First we have to deal with the obvious fact that the official story
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
I was using THERMITE in 1978. YOU CANT cut with it. That's not what it was designed for. That's great that there was insider trading..but that's not really evidence..unless you can PROVE a connection. You are specuating that is evidence. But that is minuscule to all the other things that would have to happen and be in place with out rehearsal or back up plan. I don't buy it. That's just yours and others THEORIES. PROVE it. What are the physics names??
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
NANO-thermite has been found in the debris. Nano-thermite is the military grade form of thermite. Thermite is like a firecracker going off, compared to it's much more potent military form. Research it if you don't believe me. I've given you the name of physicist Stephen Jones, I don't intend to do your research for you, I'm sure you can find the others on google. The insider trading was massive, and it is most certainly evidence in proving that case AGAINST the official story, not FOR any
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
other version of it. Also, as I stated before, I can only scratch the surface of how much evidence there truly is. I have not posed any theory, so I'm not sure what it is you're asking me to prove. All I've done is presented THE VERY BEGINNING of evidence and information that clearly indicates the inaccuracy of the official story. Colin Powell promised that the evidence proving al qaeda's involvement would be available to the public and presented in a court of law. 8 years later, this
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
I asked what their names were so I can look at their research..and ascertain what methods they used to gather their information and what their credentials are as well as many other things. I take nothing I read on here at face value. So far you are just repeating what you heard somewhere else. That doesn't make any of it a fact or even true. I still want to see it all put together and proven..not just talked about on YT..
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
hasn't happened. So I could easily be just as demanding of you to prove that al qaeda did it, since that seems to be your theory of the events. Any prosecutor or law enforcement officer knows that a good way to solve a crime is to rule suspects OUT. Which is exactly what can be done, regarding the theory that al qaeda SINGLHANDEDLY perpetrated the attacks. It's a fairytale. A rag tag group of terrorists were not able to neutralize the most sophisticated air defense system in the world.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
again speculation. Here's what I do know. WHAT operation would chance training people to fly small aircraft and live in a house in FLA?? IT would make more sense to train them on actual 757 on a base or friendly nation outside the continental of the US and then fly straight in bypassing airports and other peoplethus minimizing the chance of comprise. NOW that would make more sense. NO military planner would even attempt a stupid plan like that when you have all these other resources available.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
They didn't have to neutralize it. NORAD doesn't take notes on every commercial aircraft because quite honestly...there are THOUSANDS of them in the air simultaneously. It was a regular flight out of a know airport. It also takes time to ascertain WTF is going on and what you are dealing with. OR do you suppose we should just shoot down every plane that does something a bit unusual?? For you it is simple. I see the human element. what you are suggesting is EXTREMELY complicated.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
One of the only pieces of evidence offered by the government is the so called "smoking gun" video evidence of Osama Bin Laden, but since then, other translations have revealed that the film DOES NOT contain Osama Bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks, and his first statements not only CLEARLY DENY responsibility, but place the blame on certain criminal elements within our own government.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
The one thing I should say. I didn't really think that was a smoking gun. I found it a bit more open to interpretation. But what a better way to add insult to injury then say..It wasn't us. It's your own country. LOL. I would say that was planned by Osama...and maybe he was speculating. LOL But that doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist group and that he didn't know about it. Now..if you can prove that. I'll pay attention Otherwise I just hear misinformation and speculation.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
My point is not that you should simply believe what Osama Bin Laden says, my point is that what the federal government is telling you about the evidence of Osama Bin Laden in connection with 9/11 is false. Both the F.B.I translation provided to the public, and even the very statement that there was a claim of responsibility on his part is simply false. This is not speculation, it is fact. Unlike your statements about bin laden wanting to "add insult to injury," which is purely speculative.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
Oh I agree. I was speculating. That's why I laughed. It never even crossed my mind till that moment and I thought it was funny. But people do have some twisted Ideas and may take advantage of a situation if it presents it self.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
No, it doesn't mean it wasn't a terrorist group, or that he didn't know about it. Again, it simply demonstrates the obvious flaws, or in my opinion, lies, contained within the government's official explanation of 9/11. Also, there's a huge difference between knowing about a crime and committing it yourself.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
I can respect your opinion. The problem I have is when people say..IT IS FACT. that's what pisses me off. You have to be able to prove that Before you make that BOLD ACCUSATION and ALLEGATIONS. otherwise it's just speculation and slander. THAT'S been my whole point. I don't care if there was/is a conspiracy. I just care about the process of covering all the angles..and not just saying it it's a conspiracy ..therefore it is one. That's not FACTUAL..or accurate.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
between Intelligence and military, and amongst one another fades away at higher levels of authority, and through compartmentalization, many of these seemingly independent organizations end up working in tandem, probably more than many of them realize.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
I work with the govt..and when I'm trying to get something accomplished..it's like pulling out my own teeth to get it done. I like to use the term "it moves at the speed of govt" It's another reason why I don't THINK the conspiracy theory works. Far too complicated. TOO many unnecessary steps in the dance. They could have streamlined the whole thing. Of course..that is my opinion..if there is/was a conspiracy. Just playing the devils advocate.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
How could they have streamlined the whole thing? 9/11 wasn't just about dragging America into another illegitimate war, the establishment can do that anytime they wish. The point of 9/11, from their perspective, was to shock and awe the American public into not only supporting war efforts, but to usher in a more oppressive environment here at home, which is exactly what was accomplished with the Patriot Act, now renewed by our "Liberal" president. They wanted another Vietnam, but without the
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
Ok...stream line it..by..Lets not have these guys training on aircraft they won't be using. Let's take them off continent to a base or friendly country and train on the acyual aircraft they are going to use. Then LETS really pack this things with explosives or whatever. We won't chance them living in a rented home in FLA and talking to people. Why chance them going through an airport and being compromised.. Just fly straight in on commercial routes. TOO many steps to the dance.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
pesky freedom of speech or right to assemble aspect of it, which eventually shut down the war machine. This time, that problem would be accounted for. Hence the nightmarish snuff film of 9/11 shown to the American people by the Banker-controlled Media puppets, for the purpose of shocking us into accepting a much more Orwellian state.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
is simply false.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
By the way...the al gore thing was uncovered by an investigation by the WALL STREET JOURNAL. to get to the bottom of this post on YT. That would be a reputable and accountable organization. Not an amateur on YT
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
None of you kids have even built a fucking dog house..and you are talking High steel..and what it's design specs are and how it should came down if at all and the proof of explosives. ARE YOU ALL THAT FUCKING IGNORANT. None of you except 'the7train" has any experience with steel structures. he's talking so far over your stupid immature little hormone filled heads that it sounds like a foreign language to you. Watch the vids with out the opinions that go with them. It's structural FAILURE.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
From demolition. And from this comment it seems that YOU are just a bit heated and have had to resort to petty, meaningless insults. Yet others are the ignorant ones, not you.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
Not demolition.YOU can't proof that because you know nothing about DEMO work. you wouldn't know a demo charge if you were looking at one.Watching a few videos on YT doesn't make you informed or an AUTHORITY on any of it. Someone SAYING it was demo..doesn't make it FACT.YOU NEED irrefutable courtroom evidence PROOF.Here SAY won't cut it.SPECULATION won't cut it. A LAWYER Would hand you your ass. I get angry because of your ignorance and immaturity to the evidence.You can talk on YT all you want
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
My ignorance, yet you rant and rave about things you are quite clearly wrong about.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
I'm CLEARLY WRONG??. WELL son. AS they say in the court room.WHERE IS YOUR PROOF?. WHAT evidence do YOU have to support this claim?. YOU haven't experienced anything close to what you are claiming. You are making that CLAIM on what if any little bit of life experience you have. YOU are anything but an EXPERT WITNESS. YT the HOME of the AMATEUR. good luck with that.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
There is loads of proof backing my point, whereas your point simply have the government seal. Whoopty do: you can believe any/everything the government tells you to. And it seems as though you're getting thumbs down on just about every post you make and I'm getting thumbs up, so I'm not alone.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
No! there are loads of speculation and twisted facts and misinformation.that you ACCEPT as proof. It would not fly in a courtroom. You can't corroborate any of it. That's my point. Again..you assume I believe EVERYTHING the gvt says. That isn't true at all. I'm only talking about this particular incident. I also don't care that I am getting thumbs down. The worst people in the world get loyal followers. It doesn't make them RIGHT or ACCURATE. I only suggest you exercise diligence in research.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
"It would not fly in a courtroom" because that's THE GOVERNMENT. Dumbass. When I said you believe anything the government said I was referring to 911. And actually: "I only suggest YOU exercise diligence in research."
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
If you had real evidence that irrefutable..they would have NO choice but to accept it. Clinton can tell you that. But they liked the cheater. . Never the less..when you are trying to substantiate facts and evidence you need to check all other sources to CORROBORATE that evidence as fact and not here say or speculation. No one has done that. That is DUE DILIGENCE. You don't follow through. you just say what you think with nothing behind it. WHO is going to take you seriously???
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
LOL NO shit shelock. But you aren't going to prove ANYTHING on YOUTUBE. YOU will never get anything to change. You just spew crap and slander. So you actually believe it's that tight of a group do you? Is your family that tight? do you all agree on everything?. The people who work for the POLICE and FIRE and all gvt agencies..are people JUST LIKE YOU. so they are all corrupt..because you say they are?? LOL seriously!! What a stupid thing to say.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
You're the one throwing around slander. And it's the court's. They ARE all corrupt. They don't give a fuck about you or I. And don't ever say I'm like a politician; I'm not a lying prick out for myself.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
REALLY?WHO did I slander?. I only stated facts. That's not slander. I can substantiate and corroborate what I post. CAN you do that?? I NEVER said there isn't any corruption in the gvt. There is corruption in every industry if you look long enough. Some people have morals, ethics and a conscience. Apparently you think anyone working for the gvt is evil. I don't repeat things I don't know to be true or that I can't authenticate. Thats how the ENQUIRER gets sued for millions every year.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
You slammed everybody who doesn't think exactly like you do. It's in all of your posts. And you haven't "substantiate[d] and corroborate[d]" anything you've just yelled (assuming that's what the context of your upper case means which reminds me of Bill O'Reilly when he doesn't have a point: he just yells at his guest). "I don't repeat things I don't know to be true or that I can't authenticate" Actually all you seem to have done is regurgitate what the government say about 911...
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
...you're exactly what they want. I never sided with anybody I simply said that demolition brought down the twin towers which has substantial proof while the whole "the heat of the jet fuel weakened the steel" bullshit makes no sense at all. I actually THINK about things before I just have verbal diarrhea like you seem to have.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
REALLY?. SO..what numbers and facts do you have to go with those SPECULATIONS?. YOU are just saying its a demo..because you don't buy it. NOW go find out how much demo and time and effort it would take to do that. DO ALL of the research..not just being an arm chair sleuth. I know a lot of the numbers and what it takes. FROM EXPERIENCE. YOU have nothing but speculation. Oddly enough..I don't watch much TV..and I wouldn't watch whoever Bill Orielly is. but obviously you do.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
I don't believe for ONE second that you don't watch much TV nor don't know who Bill O'Reilly is. Just because I know of somebody does not mean that I regularly watch him. You're not worth any more of my time because you are an absolute moron. Time clearly would not be an issue for the people behind 911. But you believe whatever fantasy you would like to believe.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago
Actually..it's you who has the FANTASY..and god knows why you would want that kind of fantasy. SERIOUSLY though. I don't know who BILL is. What network is he on?? what's the show called. AND NO...I hardly ever watch TV. I'm too busy with other things...like working in an industry you think I know nothing about. So I challenge you..and you don't like it. ISN'T that the point of YT??
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
You don't have to believe me. I wasn't asking you to. I just don't know who the guy is.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
One other point..TIME is a serious issue. The longer it takes to execute...the greater the chance of COMPROMISE. so time is an issue. It would take years to plan out. I just can't see it working..on so many levels. and that's based on personal experience..working with MULTI agency and 1000s of people. They'd fuck it up. It's that simple. It's one thing to say..THATS HOW THEY DID IT. it's another to really make it happen in practice and real time. TOO many unnecessary steps in the dance.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
The official story of 9/11 contends that Al Qaeda spent at least 7 years planning the attacks, so the fact that massive planning would have to have been done, is a characteristic of either major theory of 9/11. The "they'd fuck it up argument" is a common one. It's important to remember the Manhattan Project, which employed roughly 48,000 Americans, none of whom spoke one single word about the top secret project until it was declassified. Much of the percieved clashing and butting of heads
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
short wave radios..?? do you even know what you are talking about.? OMG..stupid stupid stupid.
I'm ashamed to say I am human. you believe any stupid video that someone posts that supports your idiotic theories. This guy should be slapped for propagating misinformation. get a life...hobbiest...scammer. P.O.S.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
How many hurricanes happen in New York??
manwiththemullet 2 years ago
There has been a few. There was a fairly large one quite a few years ago. I've seen some old file footage of it. What are you getting at? The buildings being built to withstand Hurricanes??
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
okay this was an inside job..bombs in the building..How did our goverment get these thugs to high jack planes and do this? i thought we didn't like them guys over there and they didn't like us
Midnightryder7 2 years ago
see...that's the thing. The CONSPIRACY CULT can't answer that question with any logic. In FACT they never even asked themselves that question. They simply can't come up with a LOGICAL answer. It doesn't fit in with their theory...so they ignore the question. I've asked it. I want to KNOW : How did they Indoctrinate Osama.? Why would he be a willing party.? What was he promised or paid? Who arranged this meeting and where did it take place? And that's just the tip of my questions.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
He was promised protection by the United States government. Several people could answer that for you.
yeahyeahyeahyeahya 2 years ago 2
REALLY?! AND WHO and/or WHERE did you here that? YOUTUBE.?? LOL Take that into a courtroom as evidence. See what happens. You clearly have never been in a courtroom or had to deal with any major crime or Know anything about explosives,Engineering and numerous other things. That's not an INSULT. I am stating a FACT. You will never get a professional to take your side BECAUSE their INTEGRITY and CREDIBILITY would be DESTROYED. You'll get it when you are older...maybe..or...maybe not.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
bigger the lie easier to sell-adolf hitler.lies aren´t demonstrable-the unthinkable card was very well played by the traitors
pedro270569 2 years ago
the floors pancaked one another now the concrete floor of one floor is laying on top of bar joist rated only for a certain load when "healthy not damaged by impact or heat so those two come down on the next then there are 3 on supports made for one and so on. then by the time you get to "undamaged floors the load is too great. and if you watch close it didnt come down "even the whole way - you see sections of the exterior being left behind for a moment then falling in.
the7train 2 years ago
Regardless of whether the structure failed from the jet impact, causing the collapse, there is one thing you are not even considering. Which is; the resistance offered by all the remaining undamaged floors of those buildings! Even in a pancake collapse it should have taken considerably longer for those buildings to fall as the floors encountered the solidity of the undamaged portions of those structures, up to a factor of ten times longer for those buildings to fall. They fell as if in thin air!
androidstar 2 years ago
Okay so "They fell as if in thin air!", explain how it was possible?
Kikopuz 2 years ago
your explanation is flawed,we all have seen to many modern disaters and how are constuction holds up to it.newtons law does not adhere to how fast they fell.they were demolised by explosives.hell even firemen and police say this on their short wave radios.but i guess those firemen dont know what they are taking about.they know more than any one.they have been shut up the truthis just to evil and hard to understand.2 words control and greed,period.
mdelair420 2 years ago
really??? and just how is it flawed?
please tell me? i'd love to know i mean shit ive only been a high steel ironworker my whole friggin adult life. so how come nobody has addressed the statement/question on free fall speed , terminal velocity, shear, load distribution "shock loading" weight distribution etc. fireman fight fires, police enforce the law both resque folks.. that doesnt make them experts on structures or demolition..
the7train 2 years ago
But you are using logic...and you are talking to children that still believe in santa clause and live at home with their parents. They barely form complete thoughts yet. Why else would they say some foolish things with out ever having rigged explosives...or built high steel. or maybe even flown in an airliner...or been to NY or the pentagon or even had a JOB.. They are teenagers. that know everything...didn't you know.?? IT"S the CONSPIRACY CULT..and they were recruited.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
and these buildings where not hit by a jet!
and even if the building was "designed" to withstand a jet impact... it's some math formulas that really have never been tested. its mostly in truth... speculation .. and theory havent you ever heard of bridge collapse because of an engineering error? its happened.
Volvo goes to great lengths to make the safest car on the road, innovators in safety true? crash test etc but people still get killed in car wrecks driving volvo's now dont they.
the7train 2 years ago 2
Hi there, it's not so much about the plane crashing into the building, as it is about how the buildings fell that is the issue here. If you watched all the episodes, before forming an opinion, you'd understand. Those buildings were brought down with demolitions, there's no rational explaination for the buildings coming down so quickly. It's as if someone waved a "magic wand" & all the undamaged floors below the crash zone simply turned into mush in a cloud of smoke! Now how could that have been?
androidstar 2 years ago
by the shoe portion of the bar joist that maintains the bearing on beams and spandrels becoming heated NOT melted just overheated failing in "shear " and the "moment "flexing the structural elements used for the "floor stringers were very light weight and the shoe and column clips just have to warp to send it in a chain reaction
the7train 2 years ago
OH NO this is the End for all demolition firms we dont need them any more!!
Just make some jet full fires in a couple of floors make a big hole in the wall and cut some of the steal beams off youre free choice (not all of them) dont worry sure the building will not tip offer in one ore other direction and you will have the building symmetrically come down close to freefall speed ... Right?! Its so easy to knock a building down its mind-boggling we wasted all the money for experts!
strolchi10 2 years ago
"close to free fall speed"? and just what is free fall speed ??? whats free fall speed of a bowling ball dropped from 100 stories? whats the free fall speed of a loaf of wonder bread?.. whats terminal velocity? shear ? resistance? the undamaged floors were not designed to accept and distribute the " load" of the upper floors with that much center core damage. the steel members were not huge columns and beams after the 70th floor go do some research look at the prints
the7train 2 years ago
Hi there, well for one, the damage to those buildings was not identical, as one plane hit a corner of one tower, and the other hit more central at a different level, so the end result should have been different. You posed several questions here, perhaps you could share some of your "expertise" and the answers to all those points you brought up, that is if you know the answers.....
androidstar 2 years ago
Comment removed
the7train 2 years ago
YOU post awesome questions. They ..the conspiracy cult..never think of those kind of questions...because their parents are still thinking for them. They have NO idea of what goes into the engineering of a building and what happens when it's integrity is compromised.
You are just a little too smart for them...and that will never do. you don't support their theories...so the CULT will try to abolish you from their island. Oh..and they don't think they are in a CULT
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
Thanks Joe ! geez finally somebody who dares to differ with the wacko's. I cant believe some of the crap they come up with. As soon as you give them some alterative views your labeled a "sheeple".
yeah the "short wave radio" statement really put it over the edge ... dumbass's.
also the bar b q statement they use in ref. to steel failing or misforming " uh duh well how come barbques dont melt then? huh? and another post false info and phoney vids and the others believe it.
the7train 2 years ago
It's not a secrete any more any one know that was an Inside job for OIL money
Starsimage 3 years ago 2
It's not a secret you are stupid. Do you know what the U.S GNP is?? Do a little research on that an you'll see some interesting things that don't support your war for oil theory.. WAR is costly. It's costing a lot more then if we just BOUGHT the oil from them. After all..you've already said the U.S. are working with them and staged the WTC. Interesting...suddenly the oil theory doesn't make much sense ..does it. and Neither does the WTC conspiracy.
TowTruckJoe1 2 years ago
People are blind, our government is not for it people. We have been control by corrupted politicians. This is the beginning of one world order, Jehovah and Jesus Christ have mercy on our soul this is the beginning of the end. Where in that hell is bin landed? He was working for our government during these events. Hussein was captured even when he hid in that hole.
loveangel71 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thousands of innocent people died on 9/11 for state sponsored terrorism.
Look at the truth at
listep. wordpress. com
You will never doubt that the events of 9/11 was state sponsored after reading this.
Real patriots question.
--"The say tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy" -- James Madison
JewFor911Truth 3 years ago
Hi there, don't get me wrong, I am not stupid enough to point the finger at any one person, or group of people, but am simply pointing out that there are sooooo many anomolies, that a much closer examination of all the facts is warranted! I hope you will be so kind as to take the time to watch all the episodes, one after the other, I set it up so it would be convenient to do so, as all you need do is click the "Video Response" button and it leads seamlessly from one episode to the next. Cheers!
androidstar 3 years ago
yes i am working through them, very interesting but a very large time commitment... no one will ever really know i dont think
bilabong267 3 years ago
Hi there, thanks so much for taking your valuable time to watch this series! I hope it is useful food for thought for you. I believe that so many people were involved in this conspiracy, that it's just a matter of time before one of those involved "spills the beans". Meanwhile we can simply continue to put all of our heads together and like good detectives eventually unearth enough circumstantial evidence to hopefully begin to point the blame in the direction of the guilty parties involved here!
androidstar 3 years ago
it's still so sad to me....all the innocent lives lost. i pray for their souls, that they were all in a place of light. WHOEVER? did this will face judgement one day, no matter.
jadeeslayton 3 years ago 4
If you have the time, I might suggest that you start with episode one, and follow the entire presentation. Then do some more research on your own. There are a lot of excellent documentaries to have a look at, such as "In Plane Sight" or "911 The road to Tyranny".Of course it would take many people involved to co-ordinate and execute such a plan. Remember, Bush's father was head of CIA for many years, and probably has many loyal operatives willing to do his bidding, with the necessary expertise.
androidstar 3 years ago
I understand your skepticism, it wasn't easy for me to swallow at first. But if you pay careful attention to what's presented, you see far too many unexplainable anomalies here. I hope you watched all the vids before forming an opinion. Somebody did place explosives ahead of time. Arab terrorists with Saudi money? Explosives WERE used, that fact is inescapable! One cannot void laws of physics because it's inconvenient to your position. More than one person was involved it's called a conspiracy!
androidstar 3 years ago
I like the video, Christopher. Thanks for being there. Thanks for caring.
Thanks for being YOU.
hubristime 3 years ago
Very nice, it amazes me that anyone can believe the "Official story" People dont know how to think for themselves, common sense alone tells you that the way all three of those buildings fell was not due to jet fuel. I also find it extremely obvious~ the use of shills for street interviews immediately after the collapse:(
missgriffin77 3 years ago
I don't think people want to know the truth, I think they can't handle the truth, and they know it.
UsualDosage 3 years ago
Yes, but we continue to give them their usualdosage of truth and it gets much easyier. You should have tried telling people 6 years ago. Much much easier today.
hubristime 3 years ago
hindsight is twenty twenty, right? BTW, I was telling people 6 years ago.
UsualDosage 3 years ago
That would explain your calmness in stating some truth. Highfive to you for hanging in there so long.
Thank you.
(yes, it is a ship - your feature vid on your channel.) Even "Fox Mulder" had a hard time with the truth.
hubristime 3 years ago
*****
TeddyBobby22 3 years ago