Al Jazeera are anti-Gaddafi, being owned by Qatari Royals who are the rebels largest financers. Their coverage has been so biased it's worse than Fox news.
Those backing the invasion of Libya are largely financed by the US, so why make conspiracies about Gaddafi's influence in South & Central America. Last I looked Gaddafi has never molested governments or sent in troops/agents to place in puppets like the US.
Where is the so called division here? the only thing we have is that idiot Chavez who is insignificant and his opinion does not matter.
The report make an effort to bring Brazil to the matter, recording from there for few minutes.......LOL what a great division! ahahahah by the way, the brazilian government already took all its 700 workers out of Lybia and what happens inside of that country is a matter of the United Nations. Period. so silly this report.
AL JAZEERA IS FAKE NEWS AND HAS EXPOSED ITSELF TO BE THE ENEMY OF GOOD CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS. AL JAZEERA WILL BE EXPOSED AND HATED FOR FOR THEIR LIES AND WILL NOT BE TRUSTED WHEN ALL THIS IS OVER.
AL JAZEERA WILL BE HATED IN THE MUSLIM WORLD FOR THEIR CONTINUED LIES ABOUT THE LEADER OF LIBYA AND THE LIBYAN PEOPLE.
MAY ALLAH BLESS BROTHER MUAMMMAR GADHAFI AND THE GOOD PEOPLE OF LIBYA
I support a high level commission formed by Chavez, Castro Bros, Ortega, Correa, etc. in order to go to Libya and tell those people whose families have been slaughtered that their resolution is to keep Gadhafi in power for some other 40 years.
You know! Their so called socialist fair and peaceful way
I just wish they all receive same Gadhafi's treatment
That would solve some world problems.
I'd even pay for their air tickets in Air Force Sukhoi 1
Gaddafi can never kill as much as America has over the years we can just go back alittle while 2003 Iraq i wonder how many American troops and Iraqi People died because of W Bush
Gaddafi had strong ties with peronism in Argentina. It dates back to the early seventies. Peronism to some Argentinians is almost like a religion. We can see how Peron learnt a thing or two while he met Mussolini in the late thirties. On her last visit to Libya, Argentina's current president, of course peronist, compared herself with Gaddafi. Their ties are really strong. It's time to stop these authoritarian and extremely corrupt goverments all over Latin America.
@colourmegone Part 3: In terms of free elections, Germans were opposed to Hitler at 56.1%.
I'm sure that among the 11 000 000 Jews, Gypsies, Commies, Homosexuals, Disabled, dissenters etc that were murdered in the holocaust there were millions of Germans opposed to Hitler.
Fascism's rise was popular among the masses of the nations for a reason. Each country was in deep trouble, economically and civilly. They needed to pin the blame, and they wanted to feel superior.
@colourmegone Part 2: Hitler's popular support after the enabling act (making him dictator) came as a result of brutal oppression of those who sided against him (communists, socialists and anarchists and other groups which made up a good portion of society).
Im willing to garner that support may have been as large as 80%. But you have to ask why it was so high. It had nothing to do with the lack of caring, or lack of class conscious of the working class.
Oliver Stone made a fawning documentary about Hugo Chavez. I wonder what he thinks now of this great leader (who has a penchant for shutting down critical media operations) and his murdering Libyan friend.
A lot of idiots here in my beloved South America have adopted the mistaken view that being against imperialism and having an independent/democratic foreign policy is equivalent to supporting any anti-US government no matter how dictatorial/authoritarian/genocidal they are. Its also hypocritical when Chavez, who repeatedly "criticizes" the U.S., has suddenly developed an oversensitivity when making comments on Gaddafi's genocide. Liberals in the U.S. have to stop justifying Chavez's actions.
Dictators supporting other dictators why are you suprized? Time to take down the elite world dictators and empires . We the people say enough is enough . Game over
I'm not surprised that Ortega defends Wacky qaddaffi, a hypochirte commie rapist feels at home with a psycho genocidal dictator with a poor fashion sense.
"Gadaffi is waging a great battle to defend his nation." --what? Did I miss something? I thought the people of his country want him out? Maybe I'm missing a piece of the story cuz to me..if they want him out then for Gadaffi to do his nation a service he needs to GTFO...
This is where the socialist fruitcakes and capitalist fruitcakes are the same, not split. This is between people who follow God, and morons who follow peer groups and power mad leaders.
The fact is that in a situation that Libya and North Africa and Middle East is experiencing now, any relationship Libya has with foreign governments is going to be important for those countries as well as for Libya's new leadership.
Al-Jazeera knows far well that Gaddafi himself is playing every Saudi card and EU card he can get his hands on. Gaddafi is an openly declared enemy of Perisan (Iranian) influence that now gains traction in the region.
In this report, countries leaning toward traditional T-Party policy in Latin America are shown as condemning the actions of Gaddafi. South American countries with independent streaks are shown as not opposed to Gaddafi.
by the way why is mexican president getting involved and fereling sorry for civilians when thousands are killed in mexico every year by the narco drug cartel regimes
@bozirob Ehh... Wouldn't it be because the narco drug cartels aren't the Mexican government? Actually the Mexican government is fighting the cartels... It's like blaming the government of Bosnia-Herzegovina for Srebrenica.
@GustavoCLa they are doing a good job from what i read in the news thousands of women raped every year, thousands killed the worst thing is they are all mexicans killing each other, your president it taking the stage to give out to gadafi so his pay masters usa would be happy
gadafi paid billions for lockerbie bombings met with tony blair and was embraced by the west until a few days ago when the media and the west all of a sudden start demonizing him arabs and west all together bashing gadafi the only ones that will be happy after he is gone are the oil mafia regimes
As always the the international press give too much attention to 3 or 4 Latin American leaders, always the same ones, you know who, Chávez, Castro, sometimes Morales, Ortega or Correa. The dumber and more fanatical you are, the more attention you receive.
i don't think the majority of people here understand just how bad chavez is, he has already perpetrated massacres in his country to protesters, he took power just like gadaffi he BELIEVES himself to be a reincarnation of simon bolivar (latin american equal of george washinton) oh, and dueing his ten years of rule he has spent five billion dollars buying weapons from russia and china and becoming BFF's with iran and iraq.
well, it's easy: just do not trust anyone. do not trust your own political system. everyone is corrupt because they are all power-crazed habitual liars. worldwide corruption. fight the power.
Let us not forget that Nicolae Ceaucescu received and honorary knighthood from the UK in 1978. Power is a club that looks after its own. The US supported Ceaucescu as did many other western countries despite the fact that he was a brutal Communist dictator. I'm sure Mr Obama would have gotten on famously with him.
The people who claimed to be communist. like Stalin, Castro and Pol Pot. Were merely power hungry men who took over and sought power for themselves, and not for the working class.
@Propagandhi900 Using this logic Christianity, capitalism, socialism, Islam, etc. have never existed. Let's just say that the Communism of Stalin is not that posited in the writings you have read. In human life things get muddled up with nationalism, elitism and other pernicious 'isms' much to our dismay. In reality the working classes are no better, or worse, equipped to run the world than any other class. What we need to concern ourselves with is benefitting class homo sapiens.
@colourmegone Stalin didn't have a "communism". There is only one type of communism, that communism is a STATELESS (no police or military or government), classless (the bourgeois ruling class is eliminated as are the classes below the working class) and moneyless (a super abundance of goods and resources will provide for a sort of gift economy) society.
The working class is the majority. That is why it is their right to end class, their right to bring equality, and their duty to revolt.
@Propagandhi900 And why there will never be a "communism" such as you describe. The working class are just as class concious as any of the other classes. They resent the aspirations of those they consider beneath them just as keenly as any member of any other elite The working class overwhelmingly supported Reagan, Thatcher and Bush. Hitler was extremely popular among German workers, indeed he garnered over 90% of the votes in the plebiscite which got him elected.
@Propagandhi900 In what respect? There is nothing that I have written that isn't historical. I advise you to read history before you make such a sweeping accusation. The politicians I have named were all highly popular and consistently garnered a majority of the votes cast by all classes, except Hitler whose support among the German people was almost unanimous. The working class are no more "noble" nor "caring" nor even revolutionary than any other segment of the human race.
@colourmegone Let's take you're example of these politicians you speak of, when you say majority, you also fail to mention that it is a small majority. Sometimes between only 51% and 60% in bi-party states (USA), and as low as 30% in multi-party states (Canada). That leaves 40% or more in opposition.
Hitler's NSDAP (Nazi Party) never recieved more than 43.9% of the vote.
The working class, whether they are class conscious, "caring" or "noble" is still the majority.
@Propagandhi900 You may cavil about percentages all you like, the truth is that the "working class" is deeply conservative in its outlook and deeply resentful of the aspirations of those it considers to be of the lower orders. Communism was a product of 19th cent. intellectualism, Nazism and its predecessor Fascism, were reactions to it, and both were highly popular. They were both promoted by capitalists but embraced by the workers.
You need to understand , until Hitler eliminated elections, his party never gained more than 43.9% support from the populous. The remaining 56.1% voted Social Democrat, Communist, etc.
Posters for his party read: "If you want your country to go Bolshevik, vote Communist. If you want to remain free Germans, vote for the National Socialists." Claiming that the Nazis promoted freedom.
@Propagandhi900 Everyone knew perfectly well what the Nazis stood for. You need to read the headline from the NY Times published less than a week after Hitler won the national plebiscite with a 90%+ majority that confirmed him as dictator. Hitler's party had been steadily gaining ground since its foundation and was one of the most popular parties in Germany eventually garnering over 40% of the electoral vote before the plebiscite which confirmed him as dictator.
@Propagandhi900 "38,279,514 Vote Yes, 4,287,808 No on Uniting Offices 871,056 Ballots Spoiled" source NY Times. This is taken directly from the headlines above which I published in reply to your comment, which you obviously either haven't bothered to read or haven't understood. Unless you wish to contend that the there were 43,000,000+ members of the Reichstag....
@Propagandhi900 The historical analysis of Hitler's success is well documented. If you care to pick up any one of the numerous books on the subject from the contemporary "Insiide the Third Reich" by Schirer to the more modern "Adolph Hitler" by Toland you'll find his popularity was widespread among the working and middle classes as was Catholicism and anti-Semitism.
@Propagandhi900 No I'm not, it's been done in depth by professional journalists, historians and others who had far more than 500 characters. However it was partly to do with a rejection of Communism by the European working classes. This is a rather simplistic analysis but all you're going to get in a YTube comment. Read the authors I mention and do your own research, although you may not like the results.
@colourmegone .... Youre also aware that opposition doubled when Hitler gained Dictatorial powers, right?
Hitler used buzz words like socialist and worker's party to garner support. This, along with the promises of greatness for a nation that was torn asunder and slapped in the face at the end of WW1 (Treaty of Versailles) garnered him support. And with that support he had military victory and other victories which gained him support, along with his cult of personality.
@Propagandhi900 Hitler wasn't fooling anyone. He set out his agenda in "Mein Kampf" and pretty much stuck to it. The great mass of the Germans were Christian so his anti-Semitism was well received. There had been a big influx of east European Jews following the Revolution and WWI so Jews were an issue in pretty much the same way Muslims are today. Of course he had the blessing of the Catholics so that helped but the truth is people found his philosophy appealing. Versailles was only an excuse.
It's interesting so many blame the US, UK and EU states for doing business with Gaddafi and supporting the regime while at the same time they're mute about Venezuela, Turkey or China.
That piece of shit will be judge by his people ,,, Chavez is trading with Ahmadinejad also.. And when they asked him about it Chaves answered that he dont intefiere in other nations inside politics .. and that is up to the people to change them .. not up to others .. What is happening in North Africa is mainly against US suported dictators ,, Ghaddafi is one of them
@elektra1968 The US supported Gaddafi? Gaddafi overthrew a pro-US monarch. From the very beginning the US had a fiercely hostile relationship with him Gaddafi allied himself with the USSR, threatened to join the Warsaw Pact, tried to kill the pro-US Hosni Mubarak, supported various rebel groups throughout Africa, clashed with the US Navy in the Gulf of Sidra, and blew up Americans in airplanes and dance clubs. The US bombed his home and killed his daughter. Not a supportive relationship.
@luc649 and so do Canadian companies like Suncor, Petro-Canada and SNC Lavalin, who had just signed a contract to build a jail to house the colonel's opponents. Don't get me wrong people, I hate what is happening in Libya as much as the next guy, but to simply point the finger at one man is simplifying a complex issue. Those who have profited as a result of this dictatorship are as guilty, and in my opinion deserve to be harshly punished.
@ChiCan76 Couldn't agree more, was just keeping my comment short,not pointing a finger only on the US, corporate evil is as much here in Canada as anywhere else...evil has no border.
So the American client states in Latin America are following the US State department line. Nothing new there. The rest are independent and considering their positions. When Gaddafi goes....they will say how they really feel. If he goes.
@linuxluver The independent states of Latin America are the ones speaking out against Gaddafi. The governments of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua are slaves of a stupid and hateful ideology. Anyone who is against them is bad and anyone who is with the (like Gaddafi) is good.
Ortega....... Chavez...... Castro...... Morales..... a quartet of Latin American red fascists sucking the suck of Gaddafi. These scumbags have no morals whatsoever to still defend that Libyan butcher!
@HalalKafir The real fascists in Latin America as Felipe Calderon, Juan Manuel Santos, Martineli, Alan Garcia, they've all carried out massacres and brutal repression in their countries. Go to the poorest zones of Mexico and see if they have freedom.
@ahmer9800 Unlikely. Usually, no one wants war, Recent exceptions would be G W Bush and his Neo-Cons. These uprisings in the Middle East are because people want a better life...not one destroyed by war.
Ortega turned Nicaragua into a militarized dictatorship for over a decade. He also molested a girl. Castro supported the Tiananmen Square massacre and the 1991 military/KGB coup in the Soviet Union. If these monsters are supporting Gaddafi, that is one more reason Gaddafi should go.
@sonoki82 To be fair, Ortega was lawfully elected in fair elections...and Reagan illegally traded with Iran to et cash to fund a terrorist army that killed 10,000 Nicaraguans in a guerilla war the US bought and paid for. So while these guys may not be very nice.....pleae don't imagine that the leaders of the US are any nicer. If anything, when you could the bodies, the US leaders are often the worst.....not that you'd ever know it from the US media. But the rest of the world knows.
@linuxluver In the 1979-1990 period, he was never elected in a free and fair election. The FSLN controlled the media and its thugs intimidated the opposition. If GW Bush used these same tactics in a US election, you would never call the election "fair". The Nicaraguan guerrillas were all Nicaraguan; they were no more terrorists than the FSLN. But even if they were, and even if US policy in the 80s was totally wrong, what does that have to do with Ortega's Libya policy in 2011?
@sonoki82 Context is important. The Sandinistas overthrew the US-client dictator, Anastasio Somoza and then lead a multi-party junta to re-distribute land to landless peasants, improve education and provide universal health care. The Reagan Administration's corporate backers don't like their assets being nationalised and so the "Contras" were cultivated and supported. Every aid agency reference I can find says the Sandinistas did a lot of good. "Oppressive" = fighting US-backed terrorism.
@linuxluver They did do some good, including land redistribution. But they also did a lot of evil. They quickly turned on their partners in the "multi-party" front that fought Somoza. Some were jailed and others fled the country. The revolution's greatest hero, Eden Pastora, took up arms against the FSLN. Other contras came from several native tribes that were brutally displaced by the Sandinistas. Look, I hate Wall St. too, but let's not use it to excuse human rights abuses by the FSLN.
@sonoki82 It's an old tactic the US has used many times: Fund terrorist activities and assassinations to provoke a forceful response from a regime you don't like.....then call them "oppressive". Look around. This tactic has been used so many times I'm surprised anyone still falls for it. Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Iran.....a long, sad list of victims of American business interests.
@linuxluver Hmmm. I won't argue that this tactic is never used by the US, but it surely was not used in the case of Nicaragua. In Nicaragua, the US imposed an arms embargo on its old ally Somoza and pressured him to leave. After he fled, the US recognized the new FSLN govt. and pledged an aid package that made the US the largest aid donor to the Sandinista regime. The contras were not funded until - 1982 long after the FSLN had squeezed out moderates and cast its lots with the USSR.
@linuxluver fair point but lets not forget that Ortega is about as socialist as Reagan. He has $400,000,000 in the bank and most Nicaraguans ain't got shit! and he has rigged this years elections. don't get me wrong america and its corporations are the genocide, slave owning kings of the world. But all politicians are corrupt. Check out "the Zeitgeist movement" and "the venus project"
fuck race, religion and nationalism. we're all one. (ask a scientist)
Libya gives interest-free loans to other countries -- as much as $300 million to Nicaragua alone?! No wonder those globalist banksters want to take him out!
No es por nada, pero a quien le importa lo que piense Latinoamerica acerca de Gaddafi. Esos Presidente como Chavez, y el de Nicaragua no saben nada de politica internacional.
@1ConservativeCitizen I would say that about Americans...
suarezjaguar 7 months ago
love you gaddafi
voodoomau5 8 months ago
Al Jazeera are anti-Gaddafi, being owned by Qatari Royals who are the rebels largest financers. Their coverage has been so biased it's worse than Fox news.
Those backing the invasion of Libya are largely financed by the US, so why make conspiracies about Gaddafi's influence in South & Central America. Last I looked Gaddafi has never molested governments or sent in troops/agents to place in puppets like the US.
DYORPEEPS 9 months ago 7
amazing how fast leaders will turn on each other sometimes.
203207ab 9 months ago
NATO get out from Libya.
NATO and USA want libyan'oil no more
campeonpp 11 months ago
Where is the so called division here? the only thing we have is that idiot Chavez who is insignificant and his opinion does not matter.
The report make an effort to bring Brazil to the matter, recording from there for few minutes.......LOL what a great division! ahahahah by the way, the brazilian government already took all its 700 workers out of Lybia and what happens inside of that country is a matter of the United Nations. Period. so silly this report.
mrtriplewinner 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AL JAZEERA IS FAKE NEWS AND HAS EXPOSED ITSELF TO BE THE ENEMY OF GOOD CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS. AL JAZEERA WILL BE EXPOSED AND HATED FOR FOR THEIR LIES AND WILL NOT BE TRUSTED WHEN ALL THIS IS OVER.
AL JAZEERA WILL BE HATED IN THE MUSLIM WORLD FOR THEIR CONTINUED LIES ABOUT THE LEADER OF LIBYA AND THE LIBYAN PEOPLE.
MAY ALLAH BLESS BROTHER MUAMMMAR GADHAFI AND THE GOOD PEOPLE OF LIBYA
shawnkwill 11 months ago
I support a high level commission formed by Chavez, Castro Bros, Ortega, Correa, etc. in order to go to Libya and tell those people whose families have been slaughtered that their resolution is to keep Gadhafi in power for some other 40 years.
You know! Their so called socialist fair and peaceful way
I just wish they all receive same Gadhafi's treatment
That would solve some world problems.
I'd even pay for their air tickets in Air Force Sukhoi 1
There is no need for a return ticket
inteligenciaprimero 11 months ago
Gaddafi can never kill as much as America has over the years we can just go back alittle while 2003 Iraq i wonder how many American troops and Iraqi People died because of W Bush
jamil316 11 months ago
Gaddafi had strong ties with peronism in Argentina. It dates back to the early seventies. Peronism to some Argentinians is almost like a religion. We can see how Peron learnt a thing or two while he met Mussolini in the late thirties. On her last visit to Libya, Argentina's current president, of course peronist, compared herself with Gaddafi. Their ties are really strong. It's time to stop these authoritarian and extremely corrupt goverments all over Latin America.
0re6an0 1 year ago
@colourmegone Part 3: In terms of free elections, Germans were opposed to Hitler at 56.1%.
I'm sure that among the 11 000 000 Jews, Gypsies, Commies, Homosexuals, Disabled, dissenters etc that were murdered in the holocaust there were millions of Germans opposed to Hitler.
Fascism's rise was popular among the masses of the nations for a reason. Each country was in deep trouble, economically and civilly. They needed to pin the blame, and they wanted to feel superior.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@colourmegone Part 2: Hitler's popular support after the enabling act (making him dictator) came as a result of brutal oppression of those who sided against him (communists, socialists and anarchists and other groups which made up a good portion of society).
Im willing to garner that support may have been as large as 80%. But you have to ask why it was so high. It had nothing to do with the lack of caring, or lack of class conscious of the working class.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
Why do you bring boxing into this ???
luc649 1 year ago
Oliver Stone made a fawning documentary about Hugo Chavez. I wonder what he thinks now of this great leader (who has a penchant for shutting down critical media operations) and his murdering Libyan friend.
xmtg 1 year ago
~•~ BRAVO PERU ~•~
NIKKElsix 1 year ago
A lot of idiots here in my beloved South America have adopted the mistaken view that being against imperialism and having an independent/democratic foreign policy is equivalent to supporting any anti-US government no matter how dictatorial/authoritarian/genocidal they are. Its also hypocritical when Chavez, who repeatedly "criticizes" the U.S., has suddenly developed an oversensitivity when making comments on Gaddafi's genocide. Liberals in the U.S. have to stop justifying Chavez's actions.
exinferiz 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
exinferiz 1 year ago
I won't be surprised if gaddaffi is hiring cubans, nicaraguans, venezuelan mercs to fight in Libya.
The cubans especially need the cash.
Bander1 1 year ago
No wonder why Hugo was quiet he would have to scramble just to justify the 1,000+ dead by mercenaries.
abarzilai664 1 year ago
The two leaders(Chavez and Gaddafi) are so close that they are anal bum buddies!!!!!!
Bander1 1 year ago
Dictators supporting other dictators why are you suprized? Time to take down the elite world dictators and empires . We the people say enough is enough . Game over
LostFREEDOM 1 year ago
It south am, I'm not surprised Peru is the only one with bad ties to Libya. Libya probably funded the Shining path and the Tupac Amaru rebel groups.
Bander1 1 year ago
@NeoGracchus You talking about FARC?
abarzilai664 1 year ago
OF COURSE! They are dictators too! They don't want to go against their buddy or someone just like them........
psychokillercrab 1 year ago
Calderon is a terrorist hypocrit - his own army and police have been preying on the Mexican people for years now.
blackiron60 1 year ago 2
I'm loving seeing leftists trrying to deny Ghaddaffi was their hero and trying to blame the West
thorhalland 1 year ago
I'm not surprised that Ortega defends Wacky qaddaffi, a hypochirte commie rapist feels at home with a psycho genocidal dictator with a poor fashion sense.
Bander1 1 year ago
@Bander1 exactly!
psychokillercrab 1 year ago
"Gadaffi is waging a great battle to defend his nation." --what? Did I miss something? I thought the people of his country want him out? Maybe I'm missing a piece of the story cuz to me..if they want him out then for Gadaffi to do his nation a service he needs to GTFO...
juanmora19910209 1 year ago
they're all fuck heads. if u to open their heads u'll only find expired beans.
smartzazi 1 year ago
One backward, corrupt regime failing to denounce another? Shocking!
milescowan 1 year ago
Gaddafi has also been giving money to the UK and other western countries who give him arms to kill his own people for their oil.
sunRsaturn 1 year ago
This is where the socialist fruitcakes and capitalist fruitcakes are the same, not split. This is between people who follow God, and morons who follow peer groups and power mad leaders.
sunRsaturn 1 year ago
Al-Jazeera is manipulating any coverage it can to get this Wahabbi, pro-Vatican agenda some steam.
xenzuva 1 year ago
The fact is that in a situation that Libya and North Africa and Middle East is experiencing now, any relationship Libya has with foreign governments is going to be important for those countries as well as for Libya's new leadership.
Al-Jazeera knows far well that Gaddafi himself is playing every Saudi card and EU card he can get his hands on. Gaddafi is an openly declared enemy of Perisan (Iranian) influence that now gains traction in the region.
xenzuva 1 year ago
In this report, countries leaning toward traditional T-Party policy in Latin America are shown as condemning the actions of Gaddafi. South American countries with independent streaks are shown as not opposed to Gaddafi.
xenzuva 1 year ago
chile!
bapechile7 1 year ago
HE IS BROTHER LEADER!
pcpablo7 1 year ago
@NeoGracchus When did Colombia massacre civilians? What are you talking about? When and where? Sources?
GustavoCLa 1 year ago
by the way why is mexican president getting involved and fereling sorry for civilians when thousands are killed in mexico every year by the narco drug cartel regimes
bozirob 1 year ago
@bozirob Ehh... Wouldn't it be because the narco drug cartels aren't the Mexican government? Actually the Mexican government is fighting the cartels... It's like blaming the government of Bosnia-Herzegovina for Srebrenica.
GustavoCLa 1 year ago
@GustavoCLa they are doing a good job from what i read in the news thousands of women raped every year, thousands killed the worst thing is they are all mexicans killing each other, your president it taking the stage to give out to gadafi so his pay masters usa would be happy
bozirob 1 year ago
gadafi paid billions for lockerbie bombings met with tony blair and was embraced by the west until a few days ago when the media and the west all of a sudden start demonizing him arabs and west all together bashing gadafi the only ones that will be happy after he is gone are the oil mafia regimes
bozirob 1 year ago
AL JAZEERA, KEEP THE COMMENTS ON !
razvaNazdravan 1 year ago
As always the the international press give too much attention to 3 or 4 Latin American leaders, always the same ones, you know who, Chávez, Castro, sometimes Morales, Ortega or Correa. The dumber and more fanatical you are, the more attention you receive.
GustavoCLa 1 year ago
i don't think the majority of people here understand just how bad chavez is, he has already perpetrated massacres in his country to protesters, he took power just like gadaffi he BELIEVES himself to be a reincarnation of simon bolivar (latin american equal of george washinton) oh, and dueing his ten years of rule he has spent five billion dollars buying weapons from russia and china and becoming BFF's with iran and iraq.
angelo270696 1 year ago
1:13 A 3-compartment bus!! I never saw those before!!
JimmyPi314 1 year ago
Eso es lo que va a hacer CHAVEZ, lo mismo que QADHAFI!!!
NOS VEREMOS EN LA PROTESTA!!!
alonsomaldonado 1 year ago 2
well, it's easy: just do not trust anyone. do not trust your own political system. everyone is corrupt because they are all power-crazed habitual liars. worldwide corruption. fight the power.
Clllllllllllllll 1 year ago
While Qaddafi is a Zionist ass-licker who's betrayed his people, he surely isn't as bad as the evil US politicians.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 1 year ago
Let us not forget that Nicolae Ceaucescu received and honorary knighthood from the UK in 1978. Power is a club that looks after its own. The US supported Ceaucescu as did many other western countries despite the fact that he was a brutal Communist dictator. I'm sure Mr Obama would have gotten on famously with him.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone
Communism has never existed.
The people who claimed to be communist. like Stalin, Castro and Pol Pot. Were merely power hungry men who took over and sought power for themselves, and not for the working class.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 Using this logic Christianity, capitalism, socialism, Islam, etc. have never existed. Let's just say that the Communism of Stalin is not that posited in the writings you have read. In human life things get muddled up with nationalism, elitism and other pernicious 'isms' much to our dismay. In reality the working classes are no better, or worse, equipped to run the world than any other class. What we need to concern ourselves with is benefitting class homo sapiens.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone Stalin didn't have a "communism". There is only one type of communism, that communism is a STATELESS (no police or military or government), classless (the bourgeois ruling class is eliminated as are the classes below the working class) and moneyless (a super abundance of goods and resources will provide for a sort of gift economy) society.
The working class is the majority. That is why it is their right to end class, their right to bring equality, and their duty to revolt.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 And why there will never be a "communism" such as you describe. The working class are just as class concious as any of the other classes. They resent the aspirations of those they consider beneath them just as keenly as any member of any other elite The working class overwhelmingly supported Reagan, Thatcher and Bush. Hitler was extremely popular among German workers, indeed he garnered over 90% of the votes in the plebiscite which got him elected.
I wish it wasn't so...
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone You're comment is so factually inaccurate it's worthy of Fox News.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 In what respect? There is nothing that I have written that isn't historical. I advise you to read history before you make such a sweeping accusation. The politicians I have named were all highly popular and consistently garnered a majority of the votes cast by all classes, except Hitler whose support among the German people was almost unanimous. The working class are no more "noble" nor "caring" nor even revolutionary than any other segment of the human race.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone Let's take you're example of these politicians you speak of, when you say majority, you also fail to mention that it is a small majority. Sometimes between only 51% and 60% in bi-party states (USA), and as low as 30% in multi-party states (Canada). That leaves 40% or more in opposition.
Hitler's NSDAP (Nazi Party) never recieved more than 43.9% of the vote.
The working class, whether they are class conscious, "caring" or "noble" is still the majority.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900
"Hitler Endorsed by 9 to 1 in Poll on his Dictatorship, but Opposition Is Doubled
Absolute Power Is Won
38,279,514 Vote Yes, 4,287,808 No on Uniting Offices 871,056 Ballots Spoiled
Negative Count Is Larger in Districts of Business Men and Intellectuals
Hamburg Has 20% Noes
Reich Bishop at Victory Fete Says Hitler's Anti-Semitism Is Fight for Christianity"
Source NY Times Aug 20 1934
Note that opposition was largest among businessmen and intellectuals.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 You may cavil about percentages all you like, the truth is that the "working class" is deeply conservative in its outlook and deeply resentful of the aspirations of those it considers to be of the lower orders. Communism was a product of 19th cent. intellectualism, Nazism and its predecessor Fascism, were reactions to it, and both were highly popular. They were both promoted by capitalists but embraced by the workers.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone I'm done, you're way to stupid to even talk to.
The logistics just escape your grasp.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 Good, saves me finding further evidence to refute your baloney.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone Part 1: Actually, I change my mind.
You need to understand , until Hitler eliminated elections, his party never gained more than 43.9% support from the populous. The remaining 56.1% voted Social Democrat, Communist, etc.
Posters for his party read: "If you want your country to go Bolshevik, vote Communist. If you want to remain free Germans, vote for the National Socialists." Claiming that the Nazis promoted freedom.
in 1933 he established the "Enabling Act".
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 Everyone knew perfectly well what the Nazis stood for. You need to read the headline from the NY Times published less than a week after Hitler won the national plebiscite with a 90%+ majority that confirmed him as dictator. Hitler's party had been steadily gaining ground since its foundation and was one of the most popular parties in Germany eventually garnering over 40% of the electoral vote before the plebiscite which confirmed him as dictator.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone The people did not vote, the people who were in the Reichstag voted.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 "38,279,514 Vote Yes, 4,287,808 No on Uniting Offices 871,056 Ballots Spoiled" source NY Times. This is taken directly from the headlines above which I published in reply to your comment, which you obviously either haven't bothered to read or haven't understood. Unless you wish to contend that the there were 43,000,000+ members of the Reichstag....
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone Regardless, doesn't answer why they voted for him.
That's exactly what's missing from your argument.
There were reasons behind his mass support. Similar reasons to Stalin and Mussolini's mass support.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 The historical analysis of Hitler's success is well documented. If you care to pick up any one of the numerous books on the subject from the contemporary "Insiide the Third Reich" by Schirer to the more modern "Adolph Hitler" by Toland you'll find his popularity was widespread among the working and middle classes as was Catholicism and anti-Semitism.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone Yes yes it was.
But you are not identifying the reason for that support.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 No I'm not, it's been done in depth by professional journalists, historians and others who had far more than 500 characters. However it was partly to do with a rejection of Communism by the European working classes. This is a rather simplistic analysis but all you're going to get in a YTube comment. Read the authors I mention and do your own research, although you may not like the results.
As I said I wish it wasn't so.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone .... Youre also aware that opposition doubled when Hitler gained Dictatorial powers, right?
Hitler used buzz words like socialist and worker's party to garner support. This, along with the promises of greatness for a nation that was torn asunder and slapped in the face at the end of WW1 (Treaty of Versailles) garnered him support. And with that support he had military victory and other victories which gained him support, along with his cult of personality.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 Hitler wasn't fooling anyone. He set out his agenda in "Mein Kampf" and pretty much stuck to it. The great mass of the Germans were Christian so his anti-Semitism was well received. There had been a big influx of east European Jews following the Revolution and WWI so Jews were an issue in pretty much the same way Muslims are today. Of course he had the blessing of the Catholics so that helped but the truth is people found his philosophy appealing. Versailles was only an excuse.
colourmegone 1 year ago
@colourmegone You're sooo stupidd. It's not even funny, it's just annoying.
Yes, there WAS rampant anti-semitism. Hitler scapegoated the Jews as the reason behind losing WW1, Versailles, the economy going to shit, etc.
And no, Muslims today aren't an issue, neither were Jews back then.
Propagandhi900 1 year ago
@Propagandhi900 LOL
TheCODlovr 1 year ago
Gaddafi could've stayed if he didn't start killing people.
abz998 1 year ago
It's interesting so many blame the US, UK and EU states for doing business with Gaddafi and supporting the regime while at the same time they're mute about Venezuela, Turkey or China.
kyjo72682 1 year ago
damn chavez why you hanging around with that piece of shit..fuck. you lost my repspect
XxMzt4RVLCNRYxX 1 year ago 3
@XxMzt4RVLCNRYxX
That piece of shit will be judge by his people ,,, Chavez is trading with Ahmadinejad also.. And when they asked him about it Chaves answered that he dont intefiere in other nations inside politics .. and that is up to the people to change them .. not up to others .. What is happening in North Africa is mainly against US suported dictators ,, Ghaddafi is one of them
elektra1968 1 year ago
@elektra1968 The US supported Gaddafi? Gaddafi overthrew a pro-US monarch. From the very beginning the US had a fiercely hostile relationship with him Gaddafi allied himself with the USSR, threatened to join the Warsaw Pact, tried to kill the pro-US Hosni Mubarak, supported various rebel groups throughout Africa, clashed with the US Navy in the Gulf of Sidra, and blew up Americans in airplanes and dance clubs. The US bombed his home and killed his daughter. Not a supportive relationship.
sonoki82 1 year ago
@XxMzt4RVLCNRYxX
As if he could evade that,when he is the leader of a freakin state.
shurednichso 1 year ago
chop his head off. let the good times roll.
swankrecords 1 year ago
Calderon expressing deep sorrow for the deaths of civilians? HA HA HA Mexico right now is drowning in its own blood.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
South America does businesse with Libya, so what ? so does the US.
luc649 1 year ago 45
@luc649 ... so does hell... so?
87solarsky 1 year ago
@luc649 and so do Canadian companies like Suncor, Petro-Canada and SNC Lavalin, who had just signed a contract to build a jail to house the colonel's opponents. Don't get me wrong people, I hate what is happening in Libya as much as the next guy, but to simply point the finger at one man is simplifying a complex issue. Those who have profited as a result of this dictatorship are as guilty, and in my opinion deserve to be harshly punished.
ChiCan76 1 year ago
@ChiCan76 Couldn't agree more, was just keeping my comment short,not pointing a finger only on the US, corporate evil is as much here in Canada as anywhere else...evil has no border.
luc649 1 year ago
@luc649 yea but cesar chaves is a douche bag D:<
2253546942214 1 year ago
So the American client states in Latin America are following the US State department line. Nothing new there. The rest are independent and considering their positions. When Gaddafi goes....they will say how they really feel. If he goes.
linuxluver 1 year ago
@linuxluver The independent states of Latin America are the ones speaking out against Gaddafi. The governments of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua are slaves of a stupid and hateful ideology. Anyone who is against them is bad and anyone who is with the (like Gaddafi) is good.
GustavoCLa 1 year ago
@GustavoCLa "slaves of a stupid and hateful ideology"....this sounds like empty propaganda.
linuxluver 1 year ago
Ortega....... Chavez...... Castro...... Morales..... a quartet of Latin American red fascists sucking the suck of Gaddafi. These scumbags have no morals whatsoever to still defend that Libyan butcher!
HalalKafir 1 year ago
@HalalKafir The real fascists in Latin America as Felipe Calderon, Juan Manuel Santos, Martineli, Alan Garcia, they've all carried out massacres and brutal repression in their countries. Go to the poorest zones of Mexico and see if they have freedom.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
a pack of wolves
MrBillcale 1 year ago
world war 3 about to start soon maybe?
ahmer9800 1 year ago
@ahmer9800 Unlikely. Usually, no one wants war, Recent exceptions would be G W Bush and his Neo-Cons. These uprisings in the Middle East are because people want a better life...not one destroyed by war.
linuxluver 1 year ago 3
It's easy to give other equally corrupt contries sweet heart deals, when you steel and neglect from your own country.
idicula1979 1 year ago
I bet those pair get well monged when they get together.
rainbowdragon131065 1 year ago
Ortega turned Nicaragua into a militarized dictatorship for over a decade. He also molested a girl. Castro supported the Tiananmen Square massacre and the 1991 military/KGB coup in the Soviet Union. If these monsters are supporting Gaddafi, that is one more reason Gaddafi should go.
sonoki82 1 year ago 3
@sonoki82 To be fair, Ortega was lawfully elected in fair elections...and Reagan illegally traded with Iran to et cash to fund a terrorist army that killed 10,000 Nicaraguans in a guerilla war the US bought and paid for. So while these guys may not be very nice.....pleae don't imagine that the leaders of the US are any nicer. If anything, when you could the bodies, the US leaders are often the worst.....not that you'd ever know it from the US media. But the rest of the world knows.
linuxluver 1 year ago 34
@linuxluver In the 1979-1990 period, he was never elected in a free and fair election. The FSLN controlled the media and its thugs intimidated the opposition. If GW Bush used these same tactics in a US election, you would never call the election "fair". The Nicaraguan guerrillas were all Nicaraguan; they were no more terrorists than the FSLN. But even if they were, and even if US policy in the 80s was totally wrong, what does that have to do with Ortega's Libya policy in 2011?
sonoki82 1 year ago
@sonoki82 Context is important. The Sandinistas overthrew the US-client dictator, Anastasio Somoza and then lead a multi-party junta to re-distribute land to landless peasants, improve education and provide universal health care. The Reagan Administration's corporate backers don't like their assets being nationalised and so the "Contras" were cultivated and supported. Every aid agency reference I can find says the Sandinistas did a lot of good. "Oppressive" = fighting US-backed terrorism.
linuxluver 1 year ago
@linuxluver They did do some good, including land redistribution. But they also did a lot of evil. They quickly turned on their partners in the "multi-party" front that fought Somoza. Some were jailed and others fled the country. The revolution's greatest hero, Eden Pastora, took up arms against the FSLN. Other contras came from several native tribes that were brutally displaced by the Sandinistas. Look, I hate Wall St. too, but let's not use it to excuse human rights abuses by the FSLN.
sonoki82 1 year ago
@sonoki82 It's an old tactic the US has used many times: Fund terrorist activities and assassinations to provoke a forceful response from a regime you don't like.....then call them "oppressive". Look around. This tactic has been used so many times I'm surprised anyone still falls for it. Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Iran.....a long, sad list of victims of American business interests.
linuxluver 1 year ago
@linuxluver Hmmm. I won't argue that this tactic is never used by the US, but it surely was not used in the case of Nicaragua. In Nicaragua, the US imposed an arms embargo on its old ally Somoza and pressured him to leave. After he fled, the US recognized the new FSLN govt. and pledged an aid package that made the US the largest aid donor to the Sandinista regime. The contras were not funded until - 1982 long after the FSLN had squeezed out moderates and cast its lots with the USSR.
sonoki82 1 year ago
@linuxluver YOu are right. and our day is a coming too....-an american
psychokillercrab 1 year ago
@linuxluver fair point but lets not forget that Ortega is about as socialist as Reagan. He has $400,000,000 in the bank and most Nicaraguans ain't got shit! and he has rigged this years elections. don't get me wrong america and its corporations are the genocide, slave owning kings of the world. But all politicians are corrupt. Check out "the Zeitgeist movement" and "the venus project"
fuck race, religion and nationalism. we're all one. (ask a scientist)
MrStephen540 11 months ago 2
@linuxluver To be fair Hitler was elected, too. So what? Ortega is garbage and is heading Nicaragua to dictatorship.
LordSmokeMonkey 9 months ago
Libya gives interest-free loans to other countries -- as much as $300 million to Nicaragua alone?! No wonder those globalist banksters want to take him out!
LouisianaGatorGirl 1 year ago
No es por nada, pero a quien le importa lo que piense Latinoamerica acerca de Gaddafi. Esos Presidente como Chavez, y el de Nicaragua no saben nada de politica internacional.
denisrenelara 1 year ago