Flight 175 Impact Scott Myers Super Zoom

[CastingStonez]

when i watched the orginal you sent me in regular time, my first question in my head was? "the plane looks "flat" to me" and then looking at the postion of the camera and the surrounding buildings, you can tell the angle of the planes impact is CRAZY...

Also, is it lighting or what? but why is the bottom of the plane look black?

[femr2]

The impact angle is clarified here:

the911forum. freeforums. org/nist-s-ua175-impact-simula­tion-wrong-t181. html

The bottom of the aircraft looks metallic to me. It's in shadow, but maybe turn the brightness up ? Just a thought...

[RuffleTheTeacher]

What have you concluded, if anything, from this piece and the others?

[nehorlavazapalka]

this will be used to validate and calibrate final computer model of the plane's impact angle, which will definitely cionfirm that NIST did the simulation with very, very wrong impact angle, so it's all not very precise + the low approach angle (almost perpendicular to the wall and perpendicular to the ground- would further make the case for "remote" controll

[femr2]

Ruffle...Yes, I'll be using the clips in the Flight175 study on the911forum. In addition I'll also be looking at the behaviour of the propagation of the explosion itself, to check whether it originated from explosion of the aircraft itself, or other source. (nehorlavazapalka is also a member there)