A Hubble picture of a gravity-lensed pair of accretion-disk images is in the news. I noticed one image of the quasar seems exactly twice as far from the center of the lensing-galaxy as the other. Seems to fit with the 2nd and 3rd minima of a galaxy-scaled steady-state quantum gravity wave like the one I suppose forms Hoag's ring. On the other hand, maybe there are just a lot of misleading coincidences/illusions way out there I'm prone to falling for.
Main thing I left out about galactic bars with different sizes, which I think is quite relevant to dark matter by the way, is that it seems to me that galactic systems can gradually lose their core-based gravitational coherence over time, doing so more quickly when not in an isolated region. Rather than having an abrupt effect on the length of a galactic bar, it seems loss of core gravitational coherence can gradually reduce the size of the barred region as the outer ring collapses.
Also back in the news is observation of a miniscule graduation in the fine structure constant in different galaxies. Don't know what to think of it, except the same metals are apparently still there and recognizable regardless, so maybe the same organic chemistry is still there and it seems to suggest a miniscule variation in free-space electric permittivity. Anyway I suppose it doesn't change the apparent length of a galactic bar significantly.
The gist of the paper "Galaxy Zoo: bar lengths in local disc galaxies" seems to be that bars have different lengths. Relating a stellar type to a particular broad region showing spectra associated with that type, though resolution to a single stellar object is impossible within that region, is apparently SOP, and I don't suppose lensing models are infallible, so questions remain. I don't always suppose proton E/G force ratio is the same for all galaxy cores, either, but it'd be nice if true.
Just saw an article about a new paper "Galaxy Zoo: bar lengths in local disc galaxies" and I'm not sure what to make of it at the moment. The article does not explain whether the lengths are taken as absolutes or as relative to the size of the galaxy, the paper isn't free. Maybe a relevant thought to mention here is that lensing effects can be confusing, they can change the shape and size of stellar groups and probably don't always get recognized for what they are.
NGC 5701 is one of my favorites, though it seems to be breaking up. I wouldn't be surprised if the outer ring was rotating in the opposite direction of the bar, which seems possible if graviton spins are biased to one direction instead of having the unbiased spins apparently shown with Hoag's Object.
So, anyway, dark matter misses another Nobel, and it's no deep mystery why that's fine with me.
Galaxy Zoo Forum has a picture thread on Hoag type galaxies. I suppose it's possible to see successive phases of graviton rotation at successive distances from the galactic core. Ring galaxies seen from an angle typically show what looks to me like a sideways gravity-lensed inner opalescent spherical effect where the first sideways phase of core gravitons peaks (~15kly radius) and the opalescent region is brightly-bound inside a dark region of reverse phase core gravitons (~30kly radius).
The "g-wave" quantum gravity wave-cycle I'm going on about here eventually led to reding Dirac's large numbers hypothesis in protonic version, matching the 10^36 difference between proton size and Hoag's galactic ring size, and from there to anti-matter concepts. The cycle is not one oscillating over time at any point in space, but an impartable potential oscillating in direction as quanta propagate, thus surrounding a fixed source with fixed concentric positive and negative gravity regions.
Believing I've seen, most evidently via Hoag's Object, the effect that a sufficient number of coherent (co-sourced) gravitons can provide, in the form of what seems to me to be a highly-stable fixed-size core+ring galactic configuration, I developed a quantum gravity based on a spin 1 graviton, plus a way by which gravitons tend to pair-off for a spin 2 effect. In the model an ultraslow spin 1 sinusoidal field applies to all gravitons, while matter matches and directs influxes toward outfluxes.
I tend to think of spirals as pre-rings or destabilized rings that may or may not be able to regain a ring configuration. So, in contrast to Hoag's object where a galactic-plane radial section favoring antimatter via a ~60Kly core-based steady-state g-flux cycle is dark enough to imply there's not any pure antimatter associated, it not that there's appreciable antimatter in the MW's spin-plane to eliminate a dark ring, it's that a bright ring structure doesn't have an opportunity for stability.
I tend to think of a photon as an object that always carries a particular number of largely co-moving gravitons that are practically always half of a set of path-sharing opposite-direction graviton twins, but a photon is not picky about replacing some gravitons as the photon prefers to be compact as possible which it does by gravitating towards larger co-moving graviton-densities. So, is seems it matters, with light-paths actually seen, that light from stars is positive-mass-originated light.
Question I've had is what exactly does it mean to say a massless boson is its own antiparticle? Seems the answer can also explain why any massless boson should intrinsically express its energy in a cycling of the field it propagates, why this cycling effect is fundamentally related to the energy it carries: for example with photons E = h times cycle-frequency and every phase in the cycle has an antiphase 180 deg apart and mutually anti-phased photons absorbed together destructively interfere.
I'm not comfortable with the idea of antimatter having a light-repelling negative mass, because photons are supposed to be their own antiparticles. On the other hand it seems to fit with the idea of antiparticles behaving like normal particles in a time-reversed way. Other than comological-scale lensing, interactions between light and matter generally are apparently not very gravity-dependent anyway, as QED works with matter and antimatter particles and doesn't involve gravity.
My suggestions to replace all dark matter and at least most dark energy effects are two simple counteractive-capable quantum-based corrections to gravity on the galactic scale, one correction is core-distance-dependent bi-polarly size-regulational, while the other is binding-energy related and positively size-regulational and also appears to be relevant on the high-energy small scale too. Seems to me one simple correction isn't enough here, but corrections should be simple and minimal in number.
There is so much dark matter effect going on that it might seem I'm saying the core has no gravitons to offer paths diverging from the spin-plane. The core can spin and spin has equatorial extrema, but that is probably not enough. What I've chosen to do is say the evenness of the 1/r^2 flux density rule is easy to emulate, especially the slower the relevant masses, with uneven flux densities, like light emission favored toward light sources, think between two cooling hot coals, but with gravity.
I wrote before about galaxies seeming to confine their gravitons. It's not an absolute thing, but if free-space propagating gravitons have a 60K light-year wave-cycle in their impartable effect, then a typically-sized galaxy like the milky way or Hoag's object is of nearly perfect size to do the trick on galactic-core-originated gravitons, and Andromeda is nicely-sized to do the confinement-cycle trick twice going from core to perimeter.
The phase-cancellation noted below is, I guess, possible with charged matter-antimatter pairs, and it also seems to effectively create a binding energy region for the pair. As a pair of spinning charges, with increasing distance from the pair, distance from each half of the pair becomes practically the same, and maybe Heisenberg's uncertainty starts to look like a confinement-assisting process as much as the opposite.
This is becomeing the place where I put up my latest thoughts arising from the idea that gravity is fundamentally quantum and an intrinsic wavecycle of the relevant quanta is an observable in Hoag's Object and as the bottleneck shown in this video. I guess "negative mass" has issues that "negative gravity space" might not, in terms of being light-repulsive. Seems light from antimatter could exert negative light-pressure in that it could phase-cancel light from matter at the same distance.
Maybe I'm way off here, but it seems to me the strong force could have some basis in a gravitomagnetic binding energy on a spinning neutral matter/antimatter pair, where the zero net mass of the pair effectively confines spin energy radiation. At the moment it also seems that it's this static (but circulating) binding energy, happening in a statically-confined region within a background of a positive mass field, that is giving the effective positive mass energy to the net-zero-mass pair.
I meant to write that gravitons, as I suppose them, have a natural 180-degree phase shift going from a "+m" mass through ~30K ly to a "-m" mass, as ~60K ly is the full 360-degree wave-cycle noted below. Much longer cycles are possible, I suppose, 60K ly seems to be at least a lower-bound.
GR people dismiss negative mass possibility, but no definitive non-inertial (gravitational) mass result for antimatter presently exists, afaik, and I keep up with the physics news on such things daily.
People who claim it's been shown that positrons are attracted to the Earth are apparently basing this on a newly-discovered orbit of positrons around the planet, as if EM/G for electrons/positrons isn't 10^42 and as if positrons are the only charged particles not trapped in orbit primarily by magnetic field, and as if they've already done surveys to make sure nothing leaks away. What GR does to people is make all of this stuff pass over their heads. Whether that's positive, I don't know.
Suppose E^2=(m^2)c^4 is a valid starting point, meaning +m and -m are both solutions, thus gravitational mass and inertial mass need not agree in sign. Suppose bosons are their antiparticles by 180 deg phase shift separation on absorbtion, as the fields cancel. Suppose gravitons have the same 180 deg phase shift going from the +m mass through ~60K ly to the -m mass.
There's something about gravitons that eventually becomes apparent after considering the ~60K ly wave-cycle exemplified by the span between ring and core of Hoag's Object, and that is the galaxy seems to confine its gravitons to intragalactic paths, an effect much like surface tension at the ring perimeter. I suppose galaxies with a massive compact core are variations on Hoag's object theme, ellipticals lack the coherence such a core gives toward raising the wave pattern, it gets swamped out.
The "negative" gravitational potential "maximum" I was referring to would be a region of core-generated gravitational repulsion from the core, the reverse of conventional core gravity. It could be called pure anti-GR heresy, of course, but there you go, and it's piled on top of static-field gravitational quanta to boot. Not only that, they're probably spin-1 bosons pairable to make the spin-2-type effect. Should be a quick easy lucrative sell to the textbook publishers, no?
"Seque 1" is a new dwarf and it's claimed to have a lot of dark matter in it. I suppose that's because the dwarf is passing through the bottleneck, where gravitational potential is at its most negative, and so the lensing contrast is that much greater. My thought's to multiply galaxy-core gravity by a cosine function cycling once per ~60K light-years. The bottleneck would be at an nth-order negative maximum for the result, the 1st and 2nd orders being ~30K and ~90K light-years from the core.
My timing was a bit off, as I should've said it's at 0:34 , which is also from the orbit-plane of the dwarf.
Anyway, it's funny to me, the dark matter professionals who inspired this video posit a triaxial dark matter spheroid with major axes defining basically the same plane as the orbit of the dwarf, while completely missing the lateral and bottleneck deflection radii showing up best in that plane. Seems these professionals are entirely off-track with this, but heck what do I know.
At 0:35 seems like there's a lot of information, transversally wavelike but chaotic, carried within the symmetry of the upper limb. Moving away from the core it looks like there is a peak bottleneck radial distance preceded and followed by laterally-deflective resistance zones, it's as if the DM is in two nested shells. I'd say it's core-gravitostatic quantum gravity. IMO the extent to which the halo appears squashed seems far too dependent on the plane of orbit to be taken very seriously.
"The Universe" , and "400 Years of the Telescope" documentaries are good at explaining the general concept of dark matter, the discovery of the expanding universe, how Einstein created the idea of Cosmological Constant static universe, and how now we know as a FACT that Dark Matter is a mysterious substance or force that generates an accelerated expansion of the universe. We see the result everywhere, and creates more questions than ever.
In 2012 a black hole will face the earth but it can only suck in bad people to make dark matter to make hell. What I'm trying to say is that everybody is going to die accept me. The earth can't be sucked in because it's immume to black holes.sorry guys to bring it to you like that. it is what it is....
the matter in our universe had to come from some where. Matter cannot be created nor destroyed, only changed from one form to another, and I am saying that black holes process the mass that falls into it to make dark matter, and the Dark Matter Universe could a Bose-Einstein Condensate, and during the Big Bang was released into the universe as we now know it, See video for domo.
einstein and the amazing stupidity of not being able to account for 96% of all matter in space. instead of putting "torsion" and "coriolis" into the equation, they stumble and mumble in fear... check out nassim harramein, buckminster fuller, etc...
Please,if you comment on a SCIENCE video,dont go off topic with your debate about how all mighty the gods are.THIS IS GODDAMN SCIENCE! No need to talk about how science is "unnessary" if you believe in god.Science is all about investigating,testing,analyzing,hypothesize,and report.Now leave with your non-science bullcrap.
Dude science has it's place but God made all that science is investigating. I love science because it gives us an understanding and insight in what He created. I'm a rational person, I don't believe that you shouldn't search for the answers cause "the answers will come" like someone put it, u have to search for the answer, cause God doesn't just make information rain down on us from the heavens, I think He has nothing against us trying to understand His greatness.
I agree. I can't help but think that dark matter is the aether of our day - an imaginary thing dreamt up to fill an inconvenient hole in a less than adequate theory of the way the universe works. Thirty years from now "dark matter" may be cringe-inducing.
crazy mind boggling stuff. so if you have a empty space say a meter square and you remove every thing in it. for example gas, matter nutrinos etc.. then you dont end up with zero!! there is still some thing there that is making the universe expand but if we cant see it touch it or sense it in any way then we have come to a complete stop in our understanding of the universe. i know for a fact that i cant comprehend it. i just hope some one out there can
Fucking stupid thing to say... everything we understand today was once a unexplained theory... that's how we eventually can prove something, by going in one direction over another! Intuition plays a big part in eventually proving something. DUHHHHHHHH!
they still dont know what it is, but i like it cause its in a video game, makes it feel better than, the force, and mediclorians, lol, its only awesome in movies and games
Wow you're fucking stupid. OHh ya!! Scientists always claim to have every single answer!! (i don't know if you're intelligent enough to realize that the previous statement was sarcasm) The whole point of science is to INVESTIGATE! Hypothesize, test, analyze, report. That's all science does.
@everyone There isn't enough evidence to say we're sure dark matter is absolutely existent - BUT this does not give us reason to arrogantly disregard the idea of dark matter. Science is about fitting the pieces of the puzzle together, and sometimes you have to throw in a shape to see if others fit around it; it's not stupid, it's just what we need to do to further our knowledge. Just a few decades ago, we laughed at the idea of black holes, which we observe plentifully now.
@waysworth this is true what you said about dark matter.Dark matter works like magnet on normal matter.The more dark matter,the strongest is the magnet.
@waysworth Also the point to be mentioned is that, the phenomenon of gravitational lensing, where a passing blackhole refracts the light from behind it into the observer is also proof that there is an object which is probably a blackhole. Recently they also discovered many Dark matter galaxies with absolutely no starts at all..!!
YOu didn't read my comment and missed the meaning entirely. Read this:
Either gawd doesn't exist, or if creation is a deliberate conscious effort, then it is the creation of a sadistic evil beast.
With an infinite choice of ideas, why would a creator choose the food chain, predation, devouring of prey, and endless torture as a good ideal.
Only because it causes the most drama and entertainment in the worst form of sadistic voyeurism. If a gawd exists, it is pure evil and must be destroyed.
then sorry dude..I seen many religious freaks in the last few days and I hate them how they speak with their pure indifference and foolishness..I'm not a geek,quite the opposite
@Xid3d4. Yet the object of its sadistic joy cannot destroy it, thus creating and infinite cycle of joy as the created things oscillate between the recognition of their plight and the deluded notion that something better awaits them in death.
@moostar2 Sorry about that, I wrote this stuff last year. I guess I used that spelling in an attempt to express disrespect or contempt for what I believe is the subordinate lesser god creator of the physical universe. I believe in a supreme being or consciousness, and also that a hierarchy of creators exist. The creator of the physical universe is clearly very powerful and clever, but turned out to be evil IMO.
first id like to mention how lame it is to bring up your IQ score in a youtube comment. then ill embarrass you by by laughing at your mere 150 as i have scored 167(and on a real ig test, not the internet ones that test you against indsey Lohan or Brittany Spears
I'd alsolike to point out that a mental retard is classified as below 70. 20 or lower is considered a extremely retarded, someone with almost no mental capacity whatsoever.
@4Dmetricology can you tell us what kind of IQ tests you had done?
I never heard of a graduate from 'The Center for Neuroscience' who is so good at maths until he can prove that dark energy is non-existent. Do you mind to tell me your real name? I am doing a degree in Physics so I really hope you can enlighten me. lmfao!
@ONA5252 rofl lose it power in a couple years? maybe a couple thousand years.... if we havent blown ourselves up over the issue... but then your right, once were gone there will be no religion and IT MIGHT BE in a couple years, sooo i guess thats a good prediction
@Juntahh for me religion is nothing,it doesn't exist..and yeah that "couple of years" that I wrote is bullshit,I meant to say a few more years; but I can assure you that religion will not die completely becouse there will always be some people to say the contrary and fight back even if they don't know what they're fighting for.
all fringe science deserves attention in proportion to how likely it SEEMS. since there is no way to know whether your hypothesis is accurate or not, u might as well study it... maybe they'll find out something usefull even if their initial hypoth turns out dead wrong... theres just no sense in saying we dont know so lets not try to find out.
u miss the obvious difference between a dark matter or string theory hypothesis (which have no supporting hard evidence, only circumstantial hintings) and a god hypothesis (in the same boat) which is that people are actively trying to find new information about the former (and CRITICALLY are willing to change their opinion if contrary evidence comes to light) whereas, the god hypothesis is treated as a forgone conclusion that couldnt possibly be wrong by 99% of people who put it forward.
you people need to realize that the though of dark matter to explain nothingness is no different than the thought of a god to explain creation both could be false but evidently it doesnt matter... what our concerns should be is the pursuit of technology, preservation of nature, a one world nation, forming a TYPE 1 Civilization, and to evolve. right now in time there is way too much conflict so please don't be adding an argument of this to the pile
Indeed, it seems to permeate space all around us like an invisible ether. We're probably floating in dark matter right this moment. But the levels are too low for us to detect the gravity anomalies they would produce.
aaatenção,eu sou um espírito de uma garotinha que morreu em uma cerca de arame farpado,pra que minha alma seje salva,vc tem q mandar isso para mais 6 vídeos,porfavor,pre ciso de sua ajuda. C vc ler isso e não mandar para 6 vídeos, daqui a 6 dias voçê ira morrer. as Hrs:6:06:06
A particule so small u can t see, smell or touch.Tiny as a grain of sand but can be hugee like the Sahara desert. Its all around us and it doesnt really affect us as beeings but it does affect our surroundings... its this DM that allows us to be as we r :) i am no scientist, and i have no religion...this is my God, and he is smaller in size but bigger than yours!!
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT something bad will happen. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS ACTUALLY WORKS
I sometimes wonder if dark matter is a fudge factor - something unobserved but invented to explain otherwise puzzling observations. If the matter is dark and there is so much of it why does it not seem to interfere with our ability to look at the cosmos in all directions? Also, it does not seem to reflect light either - in other words, there are no very faint clouds of dark matter surrounding any visible stars or galaxies that I have heard of. Is dark matter invisible?
@singlespies Dark matter is just what they call the 'unaccounted for' matter that is so far undetectable yet effects our universe. for instance if you viewed a balloon being blown up. You can't see what is pushing the balloon outwards, but you know through observation that the ballon is being affected by a force, which in turn is caused by matter, in this case the pressure of air.
I understand what you're saying and it is dark matter's "unaccounted for" -ness that is bothering me. Why is it unaccounted for? If it hasn't been observed, maybe it doesn't exist and the effects being attributed to it are actually being caused by some other force not yet understood. It would be interesting to hear some alternative theories.
ur stupid even if god is real he doesnt control everything in the universe that formation is created by gravity which creates quite beautiful formation itself ur lack of scientific knowledge means u hve no say on dark matter
OK, maybe i was a bit short saying "who cares?". but my point was, what relevance does the fact that there's a hypothetical gigantic "squashed beach ball" (why not a basketball or a soccer ball?) of dark matter surrounding the galaxy have to the average lives of us tiny humans here on earth? Scientists could tell me there's a massive invisible umbrella of "quantum hootenanny" spinning at the top of the solar-system and my answer is still "who cares?".
see, dark matter is a matter. hypotetically it runs through all matter in galaxy. except it absorbed in some material. matter equal to energy. Well energy means comfort. That why it's important to studied
heres your answer if so many people care because its the observing of our environment then tell me again...... who is it exactly that cares? cause i know i sure do.... dark matter is the suspected unknown that is seen between galaxies... so why the fuck not care about it.... why do people care about a stupid celebrities life whom they've never met?
@Adsmunk some people do care about this stuff, simply because it interests them. Everyone likes to ask questions about certain things, be it what lies in the void between galaxies, or how water falls from the sky, or what's for dinner.. to answer your question, this is relevant because it can help people understand better what lies in space. Some people care, some don't, it depends on what your interests as a human being are.
Don't ridicule the interests of others, that's all.
@Adsmunk, Some of us would like to know as much as we can about how we came to be here before we leave. Others will never give a shit and die blissfully ignorant.
Science certainly isnt perfect but its self correcting, and quite frankly I think its still the best way to get as close to the real truth of things as we can get.
Remember we are a half baby step into our growth as a species. So is our development and understanding of physics and other sciences.
But I will stand up for it because of its rigorous sceptical approach to learning. "What makes it through the filter"? Thats what we pay attention to, thats where we really learn.
I do research myself in the social sciences area, and like any other field we have to ask "is this observed effect better explained by anything else? Is there a simpler explanation"? We use many different measures and tools for this. We try to rule out alternate causes through the filter of scepticism and see what survives. To understand the pocket watch has to investigate what drives it. From the outside one could speculate a bug drives it, or dig for the gears.
Continued: once a man decides right off the bat he knows already everything there is to know, he stops learning right there and will never truly know. The filter isnt perfect but its a great way to weed out a lot of the chaff.
I will always advocate for critical thinking and scepticism and however we can further either will only benefit humanity more. The computers we use to exchange these very comments are a result of that very process of investigation.
@shkotay shkotay, discovering the holistic information shared throughout the universe (Entanglement) is maybe the greatest thing science has ever accomplished. I'm not putting down science. I'm saying BUILD UPON THIS NEW UNDERSTANDING. View the pocket watch as a POCKET WATCH.
Sometimes, knowledge has the power to transform a meandering stream into a clear-cut ditch.
Not familiar with that branch of research. Can you give me some links to get some education?
And what we viewed with a clouded eye as a stream that can save us turned out to be a ditch once we saw with a clear eye. I to advocate learning and nowledge and would like to see what this is about, aside from the mathematical process by the same name or quantum entanglement and nonlocality.
We are going round and round. If you must be a "searcher" begin with The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius; then, Critique of Pure Reason, by Immanuel Kant; go on to Beyond Good and Evil, by Frederick Nietzsche; and end with a little Dr. Seuss (I suggest, There's a Wocket in my Pocket).
Lol among my other degrees i also have an undergrad degree in Philosphy. Read all that stuff in first year and I dont see the link to actual lines of current research into natural phenomena.
And you make vague assumptions without explaining your point. You have not provided any explanation of entanglement, or any evidence to back up whatever that may be.
I have a degree in philosophy which also includes a background in critical thinking, as well as an HBA and MSc in Psychology (Ph.D in 4 years). I have done my checking, and have asked you to educate me on your point. Either stay vague and be safe or step up clearly define your point if you can.
Dont worry man, I wont ask you for what you cannot provide anymore.
Quite frankly I was curious and have asked astronomers, medical doctors and so forth about their respective fields and they have all been kind enough to explain and define their points, with most providing evidence of their theories. asi I have for them. Its curiosity, but I wont accept somebody telling me something unless they can prove its not mere speculation.
You should have known the basic rule: "never walk into an argument (discussion, etc) without being able to back your point up first".
But I agree, this will probably go around in circles and it is Youtube, not a peer-reviewed study being examined. Its a slow day at work and I am missing my coffee. Lets wrap this up because a day from now nobody including us will give half a damn.
I should retract the ditch statement as well. I actually believe investigation of this astounding universe can only make it more beautiful. To me at least knowing about the river doesnt make it a ditch, and detracts nothing from its great beauty. But good counterpoint to appreciate things for what they are also.
Why do we all have to complain about religion every time we touch something controversial? Can't we just leave each other alone?
Disneythievesrock 3 months ago in playlist More videos from newscientistvideo
A Hubble picture of a gravity-lensed pair of accretion-disk images is in the news. I noticed one image of the quasar seems exactly twice as far from the center of the lensing-galaxy as the other. Seems to fit with the 2nd and 3rd minima of a galaxy-scaled steady-state quantum gravity wave like the one I suppose forms Hoag's ring. On the other hand, maybe there are just a lot of misleading coincidences/illusions way out there I'm prone to falling for.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
Main thing I left out about galactic bars with different sizes, which I think is quite relevant to dark matter by the way, is that it seems to me that galactic systems can gradually lose their core-based gravitational coherence over time, doing so more quickly when not in an isolated region. Rather than having an abrupt effect on the length of a galactic bar, it seems loss of core gravitational coherence can gradually reduce the size of the barred region as the outer ring collapses.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
Also back in the news is observation of a miniscule graduation in the fine structure constant in different galaxies. Don't know what to think of it, except the same metals are apparently still there and recognizable regardless, so maybe the same organic chemistry is still there and it seems to suggest a miniscule variation in free-space electric permittivity. Anyway I suppose it doesn't change the apparent length of a galactic bar significantly.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
The gist of the paper "Galaxy Zoo: bar lengths in local disc galaxies" seems to be that bars have different lengths. Relating a stellar type to a particular broad region showing spectra associated with that type, though resolution to a single stellar object is impossible within that region, is apparently SOP, and I don't suppose lensing models are infallible, so questions remain. I don't always suppose proton E/G force ratio is the same for all galaxy cores, either, but it'd be nice if true.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
Just saw an article about a new paper "Galaxy Zoo: bar lengths in local disc galaxies" and I'm not sure what to make of it at the moment. The article does not explain whether the lengths are taken as absolutes or as relative to the size of the galaxy, the paper isn't free. Maybe a relevant thought to mention here is that lensing effects can be confusing, they can change the shape and size of stellar groups and probably don't always get recognized for what they are.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
NGC 5701 is one of my favorites, though it seems to be breaking up. I wouldn't be surprised if the outer ring was rotating in the opposite direction of the bar, which seems possible if graviton spins are biased to one direction instead of having the unbiased spins apparently shown with Hoag's Object.
So, anyway, dark matter misses another Nobel, and it's no deep mystery why that's fine with me.
CACBCCCU 4 months ago
Galaxy Zoo Forum has a picture thread on Hoag type galaxies. I suppose it's possible to see successive phases of graviton rotation at successive distances from the galactic core. Ring galaxies seen from an angle typically show what looks to me like a sideways gravity-lensed inner opalescent spherical effect where the first sideways phase of core gravitons peaks (~15kly radius) and the opalescent region is brightly-bound inside a dark region of reverse phase core gravitons (~30kly radius).
CACBCCCU 5 months ago
dude... ow my head
stephenallmighty 5 months ago
The "g-wave" quantum gravity wave-cycle I'm going on about here eventually led to reding Dirac's large numbers hypothesis in protonic version, matching the 10^36 difference between proton size and Hoag's galactic ring size, and from there to anti-matter concepts. The cycle is not one oscillating over time at any point in space, but an impartable potential oscillating in direction as quanta propagate, thus surrounding a fixed source with fixed concentric positive and negative gravity regions.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
Believing I've seen, most evidently via Hoag's Object, the effect that a sufficient number of coherent (co-sourced) gravitons can provide, in the form of what seems to me to be a highly-stable fixed-size core+ring galactic configuration, I developed a quantum gravity based on a spin 1 graviton, plus a way by which gravitons tend to pair-off for a spin 2 effect. In the model an ultraslow spin 1 sinusoidal field applies to all gravitons, while matter matches and directs influxes toward outfluxes.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
I tend to think of spirals as pre-rings or destabilized rings that may or may not be able to regain a ring configuration. So, in contrast to Hoag's object where a galactic-plane radial section favoring antimatter via a ~60Kly core-based steady-state g-flux cycle is dark enough to imply there's not any pure antimatter associated, it not that there's appreciable antimatter in the MW's spin-plane to eliminate a dark ring, it's that a bright ring structure doesn't have an opportunity for stability.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
I tend to think of a photon as an object that always carries a particular number of largely co-moving gravitons that are practically always half of a set of path-sharing opposite-direction graviton twins, but a photon is not picky about replacing some gravitons as the photon prefers to be compact as possible which it does by gravitating towards larger co-moving graviton-densities. So, is seems it matters, with light-paths actually seen, that light from stars is positive-mass-originated light.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
Question I've had is what exactly does it mean to say a massless boson is its own antiparticle? Seems the answer can also explain why any massless boson should intrinsically express its energy in a cycling of the field it propagates, why this cycling effect is fundamentally related to the energy it carries: for example with photons E = h times cycle-frequency and every phase in the cycle has an antiphase 180 deg apart and mutually anti-phased photons absorbed together destructively interfere.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
I'm not comfortable with the idea of antimatter having a light-repelling negative mass, because photons are supposed to be their own antiparticles. On the other hand it seems to fit with the idea of antiparticles behaving like normal particles in a time-reversed way. Other than comological-scale lensing, interactions between light and matter generally are apparently not very gravity-dependent anyway, as QED works with matter and antimatter particles and doesn't involve gravity.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
My suggestions to replace all dark matter and at least most dark energy effects are two simple counteractive-capable quantum-based corrections to gravity on the galactic scale, one correction is core-distance-dependent bi-polarly size-regulational, while the other is binding-energy related and positively size-regulational and also appears to be relevant on the high-energy small scale too. Seems to me one simple correction isn't enough here, but corrections should be simple and minimal in number.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
There is so much dark matter effect going on that it might seem I'm saying the core has no gravitons to offer paths diverging from the spin-plane. The core can spin and spin has equatorial extrema, but that is probably not enough. What I've chosen to do is say the evenness of the 1/r^2 flux density rule is easy to emulate, especially the slower the relevant masses, with uneven flux densities, like light emission favored toward light sources, think between two cooling hot coals, but with gravity.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
I wrote before about galaxies seeming to confine their gravitons. It's not an absolute thing, but if free-space propagating gravitons have a 60K light-year wave-cycle in their impartable effect, then a typically-sized galaxy like the milky way or Hoag's object is of nearly perfect size to do the trick on galactic-core-originated gravitons, and Andromeda is nicely-sized to do the confinement-cycle trick twice going from core to perimeter.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
The phase-cancellation noted below is, I guess, possible with charged matter-antimatter pairs, and it also seems to effectively create a binding energy region for the pair. As a pair of spinning charges, with increasing distance from the pair, distance from each half of the pair becomes practically the same, and maybe Heisenberg's uncertainty starts to look like a confinement-assisting process as much as the opposite.
Sorry, "becoming."
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
This is becomeing the place where I put up my latest thoughts arising from the idea that gravity is fundamentally quantum and an intrinsic wavecycle of the relevant quanta is an observable in Hoag's Object and as the bottleneck shown in this video. I guess "negative mass" has issues that "negative gravity space" might not, in terms of being light-repulsive. Seems light from antimatter could exert negative light-pressure in that it could phase-cancel light from matter at the same distance.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
Maybe I'm way off here, but it seems to me the strong force could have some basis in a gravitomagnetic binding energy on a spinning neutral matter/antimatter pair, where the zero net mass of the pair effectively confines spin energy radiation. At the moment it also seems that it's this static (but circulating) binding energy, happening in a statically-confined region within a background of a positive mass field, that is giving the effective positive mass energy to the net-zero-mass pair.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
I meant to write that gravitons, as I suppose them, have a natural 180-degree phase shift going from a "+m" mass through ~30K ly to a "-m" mass, as ~60K ly is the full 360-degree wave-cycle noted below. Much longer cycles are possible, I suppose, 60K ly seems to be at least a lower-bound.
GR people dismiss negative mass possibility, but no definitive non-inertial (gravitational) mass result for antimatter presently exists, afaik, and I keep up with the physics news on such things daily.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
People who claim it's been shown that positrons are attracted to the Earth are apparently basing this on a newly-discovered orbit of positrons around the planet, as if EM/G for electrons/positrons isn't 10^42 and as if positrons are the only charged particles not trapped in orbit primarily by magnetic field, and as if they've already done surveys to make sure nothing leaks away. What GR does to people is make all of this stuff pass over their heads. Whether that's positive, I don't know.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
Suppose E^2=(m^2)c^4 is a valid starting point, meaning +m and -m are both solutions, thus gravitational mass and inertial mass need not agree in sign. Suppose bosons are their antiparticles by 180 deg phase shift separation on absorbtion, as the fields cancel. Suppose gravitons have the same 180 deg phase shift going from the +m mass through ~60K ly to the -m mass.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
There's something about gravitons that eventually becomes apparent after considering the ~60K ly wave-cycle exemplified by the span between ring and core of Hoag's Object, and that is the galaxy seems to confine its gravitons to intragalactic paths, an effect much like surface tension at the ring perimeter. I suppose galaxies with a massive compact core are variations on Hoag's object theme, ellipticals lack the coherence such a core gives toward raising the wave pattern, it gets swamped out.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
The "negative" gravitational potential "maximum" I was referring to would be a region of core-generated gravitational repulsion from the core, the reverse of conventional core gravity. It could be called pure anti-GR heresy, of course, but there you go, and it's piled on top of static-field gravitational quanta to boot. Not only that, they're probably spin-1 bosons pairable to make the spin-2-type effect. Should be a quick easy lucrative sell to the textbook publishers, no?
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
"Seque 1" is a new dwarf and it's claimed to have a lot of dark matter in it. I suppose that's because the dwarf is passing through the bottleneck, where gravitational potential is at its most negative, and so the lensing contrast is that much greater. My thought's to multiply galaxy-core gravity by a cosine function cycling once per ~60K light-years. The bottleneck would be at an nth-order negative maximum for the result, the 1st and 2nd orders being ~30K and ~90K light-years from the core.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
My timing was a bit off, as I should've said it's at 0:34 , which is also from the orbit-plane of the dwarf.
Anyway, it's funny to me, the dark matter professionals who inspired this video posit a triaxial dark matter spheroid with major axes defining basically the same plane as the orbit of the dwarf, while completely missing the lateral and bottleneck deflection radii showing up best in that plane. Seems these professionals are entirely off-track with this, but heck what do I know.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
At 0:35 seems like there's a lot of information, transversally wavelike but chaotic, carried within the symmetry of the upper limb. Moving away from the core it looks like there is a peak bottleneck radial distance preceded and followed by laterally-deflective resistance zones, it's as if the DM is in two nested shells. I'd say it's core-gravitostatic quantum gravity. IMO the extent to which the halo appears squashed seems far too dependent on the plane of orbit to be taken very seriously.
CACBCCCU 6 months ago
"The Universe" , and "400 Years of the Telescope" documentaries are good at explaining the general concept of dark matter, the discovery of the expanding universe, how Einstein created the idea of Cosmological Constant static universe, and how now we know as a FACT that Dark Matter is a mysterious substance or force that generates an accelerated expansion of the universe. We see the result everywhere, and creates more questions than ever.
Xid3d 7 months ago
if U want to see dark matter watch Gintama but be aware its dangerous
predvcecerom 10 months ago
In 2012 a black hole will face the earth but it can only suck in bad people to make dark matter to make hell. What I'm trying to say is that everybody is going to die accept me. The earth can't be sucked in because it's immume to black holes.sorry guys to bring it to you like that. it is what it is....
breakdancerQ 1 year ago
You want to see "Dark Matter"? Close your eyes. That makes as much since as these geniuses.
immc2u 1 year ago
the matter in our universe had to come from some where. Matter cannot be created nor destroyed, only changed from one form to another, and I am saying that black holes process the mass that falls into it to make dark matter, and the Dark Matter Universe could a Bose-Einstein Condensate, and during the Big Bang was released into the universe as we now know it, See video for domo.
gaynorglowellxsingh 1 year ago
Man you humans are god damn stupid. Water, Air, Space. All the same thing.
TheLifePerfect 1 year ago
how can i download the full video?
lejualri 1 year ago
einstein and the amazing stupidity of not being able to account for 96% of all matter in space. instead of putting "torsion" and "coriolis" into the equation, they stumble and mumble in fear... check out nassim harramein, buckminster fuller, etc...
jetrabbiz 1 year ago
The milky way is making a pretzel!
Judicial78 1 year ago
There is nothing more powerful than truth.
No lie can replace it.
AcePilot101 1 year ago
Now this is something new
Depotmaster 1 year ago
fuckin religion idiots
kassad33 1 year ago
im not being ignorant...
Humans will never stop being curious.
I never said im waiting for the answer from Him,
He can take years, no, even milleniums if he wanted to.
Im not waiting for an answer, I just know he tell us.
entoris476 2 years ago
@entoris476
STFU.
There are people who
A.Don't believe in god.
B.Don't want to have to wait for god when they can figure it out.
C.Both of the above.
D.Humans evolved from apes.
GRIMESMANMG 1 year ago
Hello troll.
A. You dont need to believe in God to wait for answers from your own god (If you believe in no god its your choice)
B. Theyre problem if they cant wait
C. Waste of text
D. This has nothing to do with your argument
entoris476 1 year ago
@entoris476
Hello baptist.
Please,if you comment on a SCIENCE video,dont go off topic with your debate about how all mighty the gods are.THIS IS GODDAMN SCIENCE! No need to talk about how science is "unnessary" if you believe in god.Science is all about investigating,testing,analyzing,hypothesize,and report.Now leave with your non-science bullcrap.
GRIMESMANMG 1 year ago 2
Hello troll.
We all have to take sides, and I believe you began the 'A.Don't believe in god.' suggestive theory.
I rest my case.
entoris476 1 year ago
@entoris476
Just leave.This is science,not debate about god.
GRIMESMANMG 1 year ago
you started the debate about god,
and I cant leave lol XD
entoris476 1 year ago
@GRIMESMANMG
Dude science has it's place but God made all that science is investigating. I love science because it gives us an understanding and insight in what He created. I'm a rational person, I don't believe that you shouldn't search for the answers cause "the answers will come" like someone put it, u have to search for the answer, cause God doesn't just make information rain down on us from the heavens, I think He has nothing against us trying to understand His greatness.
JohnBlack666id 1 year ago
It's a trinity
TheMessanjah 2 years ago
@vegnagunL
I agree. I can't help but think that dark matter is the aether of our day - an imaginary thing dreamt up to fill an inconvenient hole in a less than adequate theory of the way the universe works. Thirty years from now "dark matter" may be cringe-inducing.
Datamanc3r 2 years ago
crazy mind boggling stuff. so if you have a empty space say a meter square and you remove every thing in it. for example gas, matter nutrinos etc.. then you dont end up with zero!! there is still some thing there that is making the universe expand but if we cant see it touch it or sense it in any way then we have come to a complete stop in our understanding of the universe. i know for a fact that i cant comprehend it. i just hope some one out there can
cjkeegan100 2 years ago
dark matter is a invation to balance out their equation since they need something cover the 98% lack of mass in the universe
. So what do they do instead of a revision in their calculations? they make up dark mater.
vegnagunL 2 years ago
no your wrong. the equations predict that dark matter should exist.
kyle3420 2 years ago 2
watch?v=pPgII_4ciFU
vegnagunL 2 years ago
dark matter?
yah right
just a bluff
scientists just invent things to show how intelligent they are and that they solved all the mysteries of the universe
entoris476 2 years ago
Fucking stupid thing to say... everything we understand today was once a unexplained theory... that's how we eventually can prove something, by going in one direction over another! Intuition plays a big part in eventually proving something. DUHHHHHHHH!
bragladish 2 years ago
they still dont know what it is, but i like it cause its in a video game, makes it feel better than, the force, and mediclorians, lol, its only awesome in movies and games
KulakxFilms 2 years ago
Wow you're fucking stupid. OHh ya!! Scientists always claim to have every single answer!! (i don't know if you're intelligent enough to realize that the previous statement was sarcasm) The whole point of science is to INVESTIGATE! Hypothesize, test, analyze, report. That's all science does.
gpburr 2 years ago
@gpburr
if you believe in God there is no need for
'INVESTIGATE! Hypothesize, test, analyze, report'
Answers will come
entoris476 2 years ago
its all opinion in the end, isnt it?
Godzilla614 2 years ago
@everyone There isn't enough evidence to say we're sure dark matter is absolutely existent - BUT this does not give us reason to arrogantly disregard the idea of dark matter. Science is about fitting the pieces of the puzzle together, and sometimes you have to throw in a shape to see if others fit around it; it's not stupid, it's just what we need to do to further our knowledge. Just a few decades ago, we laughed at the idea of black holes, which we observe plentifully now.
Iaxobus 2 years ago 17
@Iaxobus well said buddy!!
limpek1989 2 years ago
You're absolutely right, I think i'll write that down somewhere.
MrSilver222 2 years ago
@Iaxobus
black holes have never been observed either
light from an event horizon has been observed,
and it is speculated that there is a black hole at its center.
ironic if it were in fact a densely packed ball of dark matter instead.
waysworth 9 months ago
@waysworth this is true what you said about dark matter.Dark matter works like magnet on normal matter.The more dark matter,the strongest is the magnet.
DARKMATTERTIME 9 months ago
@waysworth Also the point to be mentioned is that, the phenomenon of gravitational lensing, where a passing blackhole refracts the light from behind it into the observer is also proof that there is an object which is probably a blackhole. Recently they also discovered many Dark matter galaxies with absolutely no starts at all..!!
charlieking100 8 months ago
Before gawd said" And let there be light" it was dark, so therefore proof that dark matter exists.
Xid3d 2 years ago
@Xid3d OK some of you f-tards have no sense of humor. Fuck gawd, fuck dark matter, to hell with everything. How about that?
Xid3d 1 year ago
@Xid3d go with your god and stick your light matter upon your asses..don't forget to take the bible too
ONA5252 1 year ago
YOu didn't read my comment and missed the meaning entirely. Read this:
Either gawd doesn't exist, or if creation is a deliberate conscious effort, then it is the creation of a sadistic evil beast.
With an infinite choice of ideas, why would a creator choose the food chain, predation, devouring of prey, and endless torture as a good ideal.
Only because it causes the most drama and entertainment in the worst form of sadistic voyeurism. If a gawd exists, it is pure evil and must be destroyed.
Xid3d 1 year ago 5
then sorry dude..I seen many religious freaks in the last few days and I hate them how they speak with their pure indifference and foolishness..I'm not a geek,quite the opposite
ONA5252 1 year ago
@Xid3d4. Yet the object of its sadistic joy cannot destroy it, thus creating and infinite cycle of joy as the created things oscillate between the recognition of their plight and the deluded notion that something better awaits them in death.
Temphoria 1 year ago
@Xid3d
I don't mean to sound rude or anything, but why do you spell "God" gawd?
moostar2 7 months ago
@moostar2 Sorry about that, I wrote this stuff last year. I guess I used that spelling in an attempt to express disrespect or contempt for what I believe is the subordinate lesser god creator of the physical universe. I believe in a supreme being or consciousness, and also that a hierarchy of creators exist. The creator of the physical universe is clearly very powerful and clever, but turned out to be evil IMO.
Xid3d 7 months ago
the idea of dark matter/cosmological constant/whatever, perhaps being observed empirically in the near future turns me on.... very very much
trickmastermonkey 2 years ago
no dark matter
no dark energy
no cosmological constant
no aether either.
and prob'ly no "big bang"
but there are lots of well paid cosmologists with big egos unwilling to be contradicted.
you do the math...
4Dmetricology 2 years ago
@4Dmetricology yeah im sure "god made us" makes much more sense for your little brain
ADIM3N 2 years ago 2
my brain tests at over 150 on any IQ test.
I am a grad student at The Center for Neuroscience here.
I make you look like a mental retard, which really is nothing to brag about. (clinically that is just 20 IQ points so...)
However, I still do not understand why ignorant people like you are never embarrassed by your ignorance. Just one of the eternal mysteries...
4Dmetricology 2 years ago
wow!
first id like to mention how lame it is to bring up your IQ score in a youtube comment. then ill embarrass you by by laughing at your mere 150 as i have scored 167(and on a real ig test, not the internet ones that test you against indsey Lohan or Brittany Spears
I'd alsolike to point out that a mental retard is classified as below 70. 20 or lower is considered a extremely retarded, someone with almost no mental capacity whatsoever.
ADIM3N 2 years ago
(continued...)
i suggest reading the entire wikipedia entry instead of just what you found on google
and I'm the one being ignorant?
why dont you do the math for all of us mr. 150 and tell us how it really went down, hmm?
ADIM3N 2 years ago
@4Dmetricology can you tell us what kind of IQ tests you had done?
I never heard of a graduate from 'The Center for Neuroscience' who is so good at maths until he can prove that dark energy is non-existent. Do you mind to tell me your real name? I am doing a degree in Physics so I really hope you can enlighten me. lmfao!
limpek1989 2 years ago
@4Dmetricology
your fucking IQ doesn't tell nothing about your intelligence..if you believe in such a thing as religion I can tell you that you're stupid!
ONA5252 1 year ago
@ONA5252 doesn't tell anything. u used a double negative
ADIM3N 1 year ago
@ADIM3N
I used a double negative becouse only fools bother to read it
ONA5252 1 year ago
@ADIM3N
anyway zaitgeist has proof that religion is fake so that god bullshit will lose it's power in about a couple of years
ONA5252 1 year ago
@ONA5252 rofl lose it power in a couple years? maybe a couple thousand years.... if we havent blown ourselves up over the issue... but then your right, once were gone there will be no religion and IT MIGHT BE in a couple years, sooo i guess thats a good prediction
Juntahh 1 year ago
@Juntahh for me religion is nothing,it doesn't exist..and yeah that "couple of years" that I wrote is bullshit,I meant to say a few more years; but I can assure you that religion will not die completely becouse there will always be some people to say the contrary and fight back even if they don't know what they're fighting for.
ONA5252 1 year ago
no god...
JaBaManJB 2 years ago
all fringe science deserves attention in proportion to how likely it SEEMS. since there is no way to know whether your hypothesis is accurate or not, u might as well study it... maybe they'll find out something usefull even if their initial hypoth turns out dead wrong... theres just no sense in saying we dont know so lets not try to find out.
gunzaspawn 2 years ago 2
u miss the obvious difference between a dark matter or string theory hypothesis (which have no supporting hard evidence, only circumstantial hintings) and a god hypothesis (in the same boat) which is that people are actively trying to find new information about the former (and CRITICALLY are willing to change their opinion if contrary evidence comes to light) whereas, the god hypothesis is treated as a forgone conclusion that couldnt possibly be wrong by 99% of people who put it forward.
gunzaspawn 2 years ago 2
you people need to realize that the though of dark matter to explain nothingness is no different than the thought of a god to explain creation both could be false but evidently it doesnt matter... what our concerns should be is the pursuit of technology, preservation of nature, a one world nation, forming a TYPE 1 Civilization, and to evolve. right now in time there is way too much conflict so please don't be adding an argument of this to the pile
mikerules999 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dark matter is just another capricious copout by heathen cosmologists to escape the God hypothesis.
hyperseauton 2 years ago
but WHO WAS PHONE!
locomotive147 2 years ago
is it the surface of the beach ball or the volume inside. i'm confused
MIttz87 2 years ago
@MIttz87
Volume probably.
EdouardDubois 2 years ago
so we are currently in dark matter?
MIttz87 2 years ago
Indeed, it seems to permeate space all around us like an invisible ether. We're probably floating in dark matter right this moment. But the levels are too low for us to detect the gravity anomalies they would produce.
EdouardDubois 2 years ago
Yes. :)
deusAtheismus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
aaatenção,eu sou um espírito de uma garotinha que morreu em uma cerca de arame farpado,pra que minha alma seje salva,vc tem q mandar isso para mais 6 vídeos,porfavor,pre ciso de sua ajuda. C vc ler isso e não mandar para 6 vídeos, daqui a 6 dias voçê ira morrer. as Hrs:6:06:06
melniwa2007 2 years ago
And if there really was a centrifugal force, then you would be accelerating upwards if gravity disappeared.
Koujinkamu 2 years ago
robots talking about science:
watch?v=KQYG27ATo5o
jotacril 2 years ago
what if i was to say that what u call DM is god??
A particule so small u can t see, smell or touch.Tiny as a grain of sand but can be hugee like the Sahara desert. Its all around us and it doesnt really affect us as beeings but it does affect our surroundings... its this DM that allows us to be as we r :) i am no scientist, and i have no religion...this is my God, and he is smaller in size but bigger than yours!!
eueueueu21 2 years ago
WTF...
NeoTheo9 2 years ago
I'm no scientist, but dark matter and dark energy seems like a poor band-aid solution to a problem that they can't explain with current theories.
nlitement 2 years ago
@henriser123: hey you... just give thank to them coz their studying for our future.......
ur head is just full of "wet"
so dont comment if you dont have a good word to say so fuck off
89Cygnus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
space geeks..
henriser123 2 years ago
ok seriously which scientist acually said "hey i think that looks like a squashed beachball" ?
kobil316SH 2 years ago 3
Many of them.
danguafer 2 years ago
Oh, an elliptoid.
geck1204 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT something bad will happen. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS ACTUALLY WORKS
KarowAltomani 2 years ago
wut wut in the butt
captainplanetwins 2 years ago
ottimo
falcos007 2 years ago
@captainplanetwins
I said wut wut
in da but.
4Dmetricology 2 years ago
como puedo enviar videos a mis compañeros. explicame deuna manera bien sutil para cactar.
GRACIAS..
The051273 2 years ago
so dark matter emits no light at all ..does that include other wavelenghts??
or does it emit no photons at all..
cus visible light is only like under 1 % of the electro magnetic spectrum ...
but from i understand it emits no photons either...so if it emits no photons ..that means it can interact throo electromagnetism ..
wich means it could never be "solid" so life could never appear there... it would have no structure
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
Just like in Sodom and Gomorrah! hahhaa
TyatKU 2 years ago
Life Based in dark matter could exist?
noteinteresa1717 2 years ago
it could ...but it wouldnt have eyes :)..
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago 2
hhmmm??
WoohooJosette 2 years ago
0:36
Even Space is aware of the mighty Activision!
Ogilvy12 2 years ago
"Observing dark matter is difficult" - understatement of the century.
Spanky2k 2 years ago 5
muito bom
alan87plus 2 years ago
I sometimes wonder if dark matter is a fudge factor - something unobserved but invented to explain otherwise puzzling observations. If the matter is dark and there is so much of it why does it not seem to interfere with our ability to look at the cosmos in all directions? Also, it does not seem to reflect light either - in other words, there are no very faint clouds of dark matter surrounding any visible stars or galaxies that I have heard of. Is dark matter invisible?
singlespies 2 years ago
@singlespies Dark matter is just what they call the 'unaccounted for' matter that is so far undetectable yet effects our universe. for instance if you viewed a balloon being blown up. You can't see what is pushing the balloon outwards, but you know through observation that the ballon is being affected by a force, which in turn is caused by matter, in this case the pressure of air.
binkusama 2 years ago
I understand what you're saying and it is dark matter's "unaccounted for" -ness that is bothering me. Why is it unaccounted for? If it hasn't been observed, maybe it doesn't exist and the effects being attributed to it are actually being caused by some other force not yet understood. It would be interesting to hear some alternative theories.
singlespies 2 years ago
no it wouldnt be because then all would hear is god this and god fucking that
mikerules999 2 years ago
just like how god was invented by the ancients as a way to explain the unknown... now many of us aren't so stupid.
mikerules999 2 years ago
dont talk about religion youll only start an argument here
GARCESA2 2 years ago
Help my friend
accessing this video ...
is, magnificent, spectacular
creative and is among the 10 most creative the universe.
Thanks
watch?v=pkoVfggAcWc
ImGoodDmore 2 years ago
Dude, why is people talking about God here? The dark matter is not God!!!
Everyone knows the dark matter is Satan, DUH!!!
MastermindX 2 years ago
No one is saying dark matter is God, lol.
1tephania 2 years ago
what exactly is "dark matter" <.<
BaSisK8 2 years ago
matter that doesnt emit light duh
Chrisindapurplehouse 2 years ago 2
Our galaxy is screwing up another one???
God is just awesome,how else can create such a beautiful thing??
PS: i don't care what the atheits think about this comment so please don't reply
andree1991 2 years ago
God is right here, in my underpants, and he is red haired.
PS: I don't care what you think atheists should when they see your coments.
bunecodemacumba 2 years ago
ur stupid even if god is real he doesnt control everything in the universe that formation is created by gravity which creates quite beautiful formation itself ur lack of scientific knowledge means u hve no say on dark matter
Chrisindapurplehouse 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
question: who cares?
Adsmunk 2 years ago
@Adsmunk People who've been pondering the creation of the universe and galaxies?
Rholoff 2 years ago
OK, maybe i was a bit short saying "who cares?". but my point was, what relevance does the fact that there's a hypothetical gigantic "squashed beach ball" (why not a basketball or a soccer ball?) of dark matter surrounding the galaxy have to the average lives of us tiny humans here on earth? Scientists could tell me there's a massive invisible umbrella of "quantum hootenanny" spinning at the top of the solar-system and my answer is still "who cares?".
Adsmunk 2 years ago
see, dark matter is a matter. hypotetically it runs through all matter in galaxy. except it absorbed in some material. matter equal to energy. Well energy means comfort. That why it's important to studied
probokator 2 years ago
heres your answer if so many people care because its the observing of our environment then tell me again...... who is it exactly that cares? cause i know i sure do.... dark matter is the suspected unknown that is seen between galaxies... so why the fuck not care about it.... why do people care about a stupid celebrities life whom they've never met?
mikerules999 2 years ago
@Adsmunk some people do care about this stuff, simply because it interests them. Everyone likes to ask questions about certain things, be it what lies in the void between galaxies, or how water falls from the sky, or what's for dinner.. to answer your question, this is relevant because it can help people understand better what lies in space. Some people care, some don't, it depends on what your interests as a human being are.
Don't ridicule the interests of others, that's all.
angryperson3 2 years ago 2
@angryperson3 i agree. Those who asks usually gets an answer and ends up beeing the smartest one...
matsrudi 2 years ago
@Adsmunk, Some of us would like to know as much as we can about how we came to be here before we leave. Others will never give a shit and die blissfully ignorant.
So you are part of that second group. Who cares?
chodaboy51500 2 years ago 2
people who actually WONDER
BeondaPale 2 years ago
Science certainly isnt perfect but its self correcting, and quite frankly I think its still the best way to get as close to the real truth of things as we can get.
Remember we are a half baby step into our growth as a species. So is our development and understanding of physics and other sciences.
But I will stand up for it because of its rigorous sceptical approach to learning. "What makes it through the filter"? Thats what we pay attention to, thats where we really learn.
shkotay 2 years ago
It is the mesh of the filter that obstructs our vision; like trying to understand a pocket watch by examining the teeth on one of its gears.
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
I do research myself in the social sciences area, and like any other field we have to ask "is this observed effect better explained by anything else? Is there a simpler explanation"? We use many different measures and tools for this. We try to rule out alternate causes through the filter of scepticism and see what survives. To understand the pocket watch has to investigate what drives it. From the outside one could speculate a bug drives it, or dig for the gears.
shkotay 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
Continued: once a man decides right off the bat he knows already everything there is to know, he stops learning right there and will never truly know. The filter isnt perfect but its a great way to weed out a lot of the chaff.
I will always advocate for critical thinking and scepticism and however we can further either will only benefit humanity more. The computers we use to exchange these very comments are a result of that very process of investigation.
shkotay 2 years ago
@shkotay shkotay, discovering the holistic information shared throughout the universe (Entanglement) is maybe the greatest thing science has ever accomplished. I'm not putting down science. I'm saying BUILD UPON THIS NEW UNDERSTANDING. View the pocket watch as a POCKET WATCH.
Sometimes, knowledge has the power to transform a meandering stream into a clear-cut ditch.
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
Not familiar with that branch of research. Can you give me some links to get some education?
And what we viewed with a clouded eye as a stream that can save us turned out to be a ditch once we saw with a clear eye. I to advocate learning and nowledge and would like to see what this is about, aside from the mathematical process by the same name or quantum entanglement and nonlocality.
shkotay 2 years ago
@shkotay
We are going round and round. If you must be a "searcher" begin with The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius; then, Critique of Pure Reason, by Immanuel Kant; go on to Beyond Good and Evil, by Frederick Nietzsche; and end with a little Dr. Seuss (I suggest, There's a Wocket in my Pocket).
~Edward
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
Lol among my other degrees i also have an undergrad degree in Philosphy. Read all that stuff in first year and I dont see the link to actual lines of current research into natural phenomena.
But yep, we can also agree to disagree.
shkotay 2 years ago
@shkotay
You must learn the process of thinking before we can discuss anything else. Crack into the old "first year stuff" one more time.
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
And you make vague assumptions without explaining your point. You have not provided any explanation of entanglement, or any evidence to back up whatever that may be.
I have a degree in philosophy which also includes a background in critical thinking, as well as an HBA and MSc in Psychology (Ph.D in 4 years). I have done my checking, and have asked you to educate me on your point. Either stay vague and be safe or step up clearly define your point if you can.
shkotay 2 years ago
@shkotay
Apply your Psychology training to realize why you keep on with this!
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
Dont worry man, I wont ask you for what you cannot provide anymore.
Quite frankly I was curious and have asked astronomers, medical doctors and so forth about their respective fields and they have all been kind enough to explain and define their points, with most providing evidence of their theories. asi I have for them. Its curiosity, but I wont accept somebody telling me something unless they can prove its not mere speculation.
But best wishes and good day.
shkotay 2 years ago
@shkotay
Okay crazy person. Blocking you now...
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
Bobby the Plank Length is closer to 10^ -35 meters, and yes its commonly believed that shorter distances are not physically meaningful.
TheMerlinOfAR 2 years ago
@shkotay if you was a boy
zeldalouca 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
You should have known the basic rule: "never walk into an argument (discussion, etc) without being able to back your point up first".
But I agree, this will probably go around in circles and it is Youtube, not a peer-reviewed study being examined. Its a slow day at work and I am missing my coffee. Lets wrap this up because a day from now nobody including us will give half a damn.
shkotay 2 years ago
@shkotay
Oh yes, definitely drink more coffee.
BobbynEdward 2 years ago
@BobbynEdward
I should retract the ditch statement as well. I actually believe investigation of this astounding universe can only make it more beautiful. To me at least knowing about the river doesnt make it a ditch, and detracts nothing from its great beauty. But good counterpoint to appreciate things for what they are also.
shkotay 2 years ago
es un buen video
cuobaya 2 years ago
It's a pretzel.
MrGuarana2 2 years ago 2