A lot of it is outdated, and doesn't apply anymore since we live in a new age. But philosophy is like art in that it is everywhere, you just have to find the type that you're into.
A lot of people see Kant as cold and misanthropic. He's vehemently deontological, and states that acting out of duty though clenched teeth is more morally favourable than doing a good deed out of genuine goodness.
I find it hard to agree with Kant entirely, but you have to credit his ambitiousness and the intellect of some of his points. That said, I find his material quite laboursome to read.
I very much disagree if we must shy away in an entrapic state of unbelief and denial of knowledge , we wouldn't be able to at all as you said earlier acheve any headway in metaphysics - and metaphysics basically abandons any pure reason and does not in turn go against morality and Kant was indeed a theolgian and he did state so and that doesn't give him any dogmatic criticism
Kant was not a philosoher, he was a theologian. He basically said so himself. He was the most wordy and pretentious theologian in the history of theology, but het was a theologian nonetheless. He was basically trying to save God from reason. I'm an atheist, so I can't take anything he says seriously.
Well, you obviously have not read a significant amount about him. Little is known about his life and what is shows him to be merely a man of habit and thought. He is not a theologian, and can clearly be seen as a diest, like many founding fathers. He talks about God, but in a more diestic sense as the principle cause. He knew nothing of Darwin or Physics, and therefore had no other explanation.
Indeed Kant rejected the cosmological argument for the existence of God (along with all other alleged proofs). Instead the apparent teleological structure of nature is ascribed to reason and judgment itself (ref. KdU). God can never be an object of theoretical reason and hence is assigned the position of a practical postulate (of practical reason) along with equally transcendent issues, freedom and immortality.
Kant was emphatically not a theologian. At least not in any contemporary sense of that term. The entire critical method and the project of enlightenment signifies European culture's route away from religious dogmatism, relying instead of the autonomous capacity for critique inherent to reason. I have studied Kant intensively for nearly ten years now, and it is safe to say that your assesment is quite simply wrong.
Great stuff guys, wish you could have done one on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason"
icwo 3 years ago
Philosophy is such a waste of time. I'm going to watch "how to make a wallet" from Expert Village.
kerumble 3 years ago
A lot of it is outdated, and doesn't apply anymore since we live in a new age. But philosophy is like art in that it is everywhere, you just have to find the type that you're into.
icwo 3 years ago
Philosophy is the study of thought and existence, I can't actually think of anything more important.
MrSqiffy 2 years ago
bich you suck camel dick
pupet24 3 years ago
cool i luv puppet shows they rock
galpal12345 3 years ago
the acting in this is rubbish
thekempe72 3 years ago
A lot of people see Kant as cold and misanthropic. He's vehemently deontological, and states that acting out of duty though clenched teeth is more morally favourable than doing a good deed out of genuine goodness.
I find it hard to agree with Kant entirely, but you have to credit his ambitiousness and the intellect of some of his points. That said, I find his material quite laboursome to read.
Uxoriouswidow 4 years ago
OMG!!!!! This is my teacher!!!! He was showing us the Kant puppet today. Hes a great teacher. And you dont usualy forget his lectures easily.
Dranged1016 4 years ago
One cool teacher :)
hugoestr 4 years ago
It figures.
socrpimp1234 3 years ago
From the Critique of Pure Reason. If that's not a religious agenda, I don't know what is.
godlesstechnocrat 4 years ago
I have therefore
found it necessary to deny knowledge, in order to make room
for faith. The dogmatism of metaphysics, that is, the precon-
ception that it is possible to make headway in metaphysics with-
out a previous criticism of pure reason, is the source of all that
unbelief, always very dogmatic, which wars against morality.
godlesstechnocrat 4 years ago
I very much disagree if we must shy away in an entrapic state of unbelief and denial of knowledge , we wouldn't be able to at all as you said earlier acheve any headway in metaphysics - and metaphysics basically abandons any pure reason and does not in turn go against morality and Kant was indeed a theolgian and he did state so and that doesn't give him any dogmatic criticism
MikeG506 4 years ago
Kant was not a philosoher, he was a theologian. He basically said so himself. He was the most wordy and pretentious theologian in the history of theology, but het was a theologian nonetheless. He was basically trying to save God from reason. I'm an atheist, so I can't take anything he says seriously.
godlesstechnocrat 4 years ago
Well, you obviously have not read a significant amount about him. Little is known about his life and what is shows him to be merely a man of habit and thought. He is not a theologian, and can clearly be seen as a diest, like many founding fathers. He talks about God, but in a more diestic sense as the principle cause. He knew nothing of Darwin or Physics, and therefore had no other explanation.
JoshL11185 4 years ago
[From what has already been said, it is evident that] even the
assumption--as made on behalf of the necessary practical em-
ployment of my reason -- of God, freedom, and immortality is
not permissible unless at the same time speculative reason be
deprived of its pretensions to transcendent insight.
godlesstechnocrat 4 years ago
Indeed Kant rejected the cosmological argument for the existence of God (along with all other alleged proofs). Instead the apparent teleological structure of nature is ascribed to reason and judgment itself (ref. KdU). God can never be an object of theoretical reason and hence is assigned the position of a practical postulate (of practical reason) along with equally transcendent issues, freedom and immortality.
jcblkr 4 years ago
Kant was emphatically not a theologian. At least not in any contemporary sense of that term. The entire critical method and the project of enlightenment signifies European culture's route away from religious dogmatism, relying instead of the autonomous capacity for critique inherent to reason. I have studied Kant intensively for nearly ten years now, and it is safe to say that your assesment is quite simply wrong.
jcblkr 4 years ago
Fantastic! If I tell my teacher I'm repeating Kant in this way, with this video, she will probably laugh for half an hour..! ^_^
flofrasso 4 years ago
Very nice review, categorically:) I say.
Ben1524 4 years ago
I love it. Good job. :-]
altargirl89 4 years ago
long
cindygonzalez101 4 years ago
FUNNY VOCIES LOL!
cindygonzalez101 4 years ago
where did these puppets come from
GreenPhilosopher 4 years ago
philosophersguild . com
JoshL11185 4 years ago
LOL!
Zephon20 4 years ago
Freud? Or Schwarzenegger?
mavaddat 4 years ago
really nice, greating of a student philosophy in Belgium.
BTW did you guys pass for making this video?
Bladdacker 4 years ago
Well, it was only my project, but yeah, I passed. I handed out little sheets for people to fill out while it was playing too.
JoshL11185 4 years ago
hahaha, great stuff, I was laughing at the beginning, and then it gets kinda serious and all.
Easst 4 years ago