All the stupid people commenting on this that it wasnt a plane well stupid people 100plus tons of airplane does not disintigrate on impact and every single wreck in history has left wings seats wheels and engines and bodies or pieces of them left and this is from aircraft coming straight down into the earth so you need to understand the pentagon is not a superfortress and the size of the hole and location make it impossible to be an airliner, If so the pilot is the best who ever lived.
several ppl SAW and reported an AA boeing airliner HIT the f#king building and bits a peices were in plain sight in several of the first photos released ..does this child really expect to SEE an airplane or even some large parts after a 500mph impact?...like when he crashes a steel corgi toy into his own lego building model?
The World Trade Center had wing damage because it is simply concrete and steel, not reinforced limestone like the pentagon. And, if it were a missile why did the roof collapse in instead of blow out and away? It wasn't a missile, it was a projectile that collided with and did damage to the structure causing the roof to collapse inward. If you ever seen a missile strike you would be able to see the truth here. A plane hit it. End of story. Go read Tom Clancy if you want conspiracy theories.
Hmm, no plane huh? Probably because it was destroyed on impact idiot! Watch a test demonstration of a plane crashing into a wall and you'll see that it is always catastrophically destroyed, practically disintegrated. And why is there no wing damage? The pentagon is reinforced limestone. the wings are the weakest part of the plane in the event of crash. The wings hit the building and exploded, and there are around the hole there are wide burn marks. No mystery, no conspiracy, basic science. idiot
From 9 11 research dot wt7 dot net you can view photographs of plane wreckage from inside the pentagon as well as bodies. I don't know how I stand on the issue, but does anyone care to reply with an opinion on this?
I watch television to be entertained, not to learn the truth. Truth is spoken word, and is usually faulty. I seek facts because they are irrefutable. Since television or any other printed media format can never offer me facts, I am inclined to never acknowledge them as reputable or trusted information.
I was in DC when this happened, and I will never forget this one guy who was interviewed minutes after the explosion. He was on the Interstate enroute to work when he pulled over. A reporter asked him did he see the plane when it hit the building? The guy answered 'the plane never hit the building, it flew over it'.
It should also be noted the the surface area that is scorched exactly matches the area that should have been hit by the wings(remember, wings are fuel tanks). So unless Big Brother was out there spraying jet fuel on the side of the building (someone might have noticed that one), I don't see any reason to doubt the official story.
I didnt find this very compelling. 757s are, for their size, mostly empty space. Jet engines are misleading also. If you look up designs you can see how they are made of layered sheets of metal and would come totally apart in a crash. With the exception of the cores, which were in fact found and photographed. The wings are shells, containing fuel, were already partially sheared off which would have allowed fuel to drain, not leaving enough mass to penetrate the building & scattering on impact.
It should also be noted the the surface area that is scorched exactly matches the area that should have been hit by the wings(remember, wings are fuel tanks). So unless Big Brother was out there spraying jet fuel on the side of the building (someone might have noticed that one), I don't see any reason to doubt the official story.
It should also be noted the the surface area that is scorched exactly matches the area that should have been hit by the wings(remember, wings are fuel tanks). So unless Big Brother was out there spraying jet fuel on the side of the building (someone might have noticed that one), I don't see any reason to doubt the official story.
I again have to say, what we saw hit the twin towers was television. Do you believe everything you see on television? If no plane hit the pentago, why should we assume that television showed what actually happened to the towers?
I don't watch TV. Haven't tuned into any shows or news in 3 years cause I've learned T.V. is designed to control public thought, actions and opinions. TV is also responsible for causing people to LIVE in FEAR while being brain washed by the media.
All I know is 9/11 was an inside job that was orchestrated by the US Government to bring forth the New World Order. I'm sure we both can agree on that base on the facts all over the Web. There were no hijackers or passengers.
Never thought about it, but nope, no Plane nowhere. Most of us were so shocked by the Towers that one just slipped right through. They could have told us a plane hit anything around that time
missle..
compaqvideos1 3 months ago
this guy is retarded it blow up when it hit the tower and there was smoke how can you see it if there is smoke on the impact
atomicman112 5 months ago
All the stupid people commenting on this that it wasnt a plane well stupid people 100plus tons of airplane does not disintigrate on impact and every single wreck in history has left wings seats wheels and engines and bodies or pieces of them left and this is from aircraft coming straight down into the earth so you need to understand the pentagon is not a superfortress and the size of the hole and location make it impossible to be an airliner, If so the pilot is the best who ever lived.
Krylogenic 5 months ago
several ppl SAW and reported an AA boeing airliner HIT the f#king building and bits a peices were in plain sight in several of the first photos released ..does this child really expect to SEE an airplane or even some large parts after a 500mph impact?...like when he crashes a steel corgi toy into his own lego building model?
woodenmajor 5 months ago
The World Trade Center had wing damage because it is simply concrete and steel, not reinforced limestone like the pentagon. And, if it were a missile why did the roof collapse in instead of blow out and away? It wasn't a missile, it was a projectile that collided with and did damage to the structure causing the roof to collapse inward. If you ever seen a missile strike you would be able to see the truth here. A plane hit it. End of story. Go read Tom Clancy if you want conspiracy theories.
joebobahead 5 months ago
Hmm, no plane huh? Probably because it was destroyed on impact idiot! Watch a test demonstration of a plane crashing into a wall and you'll see that it is always catastrophically destroyed, practically disintegrated. And why is there no wing damage? The pentagon is reinforced limestone. the wings are the weakest part of the plane in the event of crash. The wings hit the building and exploded, and there are around the hole there are wide burn marks. No mystery, no conspiracy, basic science. idiot
joebobahead 5 months ago
From 9 11 research dot wt7 dot net you can view photographs of plane wreckage from inside the pentagon as well as bodies. I don't know how I stand on the issue, but does anyone care to reply with an opinion on this?
kazoorocketman54 8 months ago
people people,the best thing we can do is relax with some milk.im only 8
MrEliwhite2002 11 months ago
Where is the reconstructed plane? Flight 800 was rebuilt on a scaffold from pieces dredged up from the ocean floor. Where are the forensics?
Uncle5cary 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Shouting)
9/11 was an inside job.
JCTheServant 1 year ago
I believe that the two planes that didn't hit the towers were shot down by our government.
i don't know what hit the pentagon but it wasnt a plane. i dont even see plane debris...
bellacnella18 1 year ago
I watch television to be entertained, not to learn the truth. Truth is spoken word, and is usually faulty. I seek facts because they are irrefutable. Since television or any other printed media format can never offer me facts, I am inclined to never acknowledge them as reputable or trusted information.
DeusImperium 1 year ago
I was in DC when this happened, and I will never forget this one guy who was interviewed minutes after the explosion. He was on the Interstate enroute to work when he pulled over. A reporter asked him did he see the plane when it hit the building? The guy answered 'the plane never hit the building, it flew over it'.
msblacknsilky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It should also be noted the the surface area that is scorched exactly matches the area that should have been hit by the wings(remember, wings are fuel tanks). So unless Big Brother was out there spraying jet fuel on the side of the building (someone might have noticed that one), I don't see any reason to doubt the official story.
Kajintoz 1 year ago
I didnt find this very compelling. 757s are, for their size, mostly empty space. Jet engines are misleading also. If you look up designs you can see how they are made of layered sheets of metal and would come totally apart in a crash. With the exception of the cores, which were in fact found and photographed. The wings are shells, containing fuel, were already partially sheared off which would have allowed fuel to drain, not leaving enough mass to penetrate the building & scattering on impact.
Kajintoz 1 year ago
It should also be noted the the surface area that is scorched exactly matches the area that should have been hit by the wings(remember, wings are fuel tanks). So unless Big Brother was out there spraying jet fuel on the side of the building (someone might have noticed that one), I don't see any reason to doubt the official story.
Kajintoz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It should also be noted the the surface area that is scorched exactly matches the area that should have been hit by the wings(remember, wings are fuel tanks). So unless Big Brother was out there spraying jet fuel on the side of the building (someone might have noticed that one), I don't see any reason to doubt the official story.
Kajintoz 1 year ago
waste of time propaganda... or a naive kid.
DATALAZE77 1 year ago
wow this is interesting.
ginaluv3613 1 year ago
That's a good question, where is the plane? What do you think hit the Pentagon?
MyAfroShow 1 year ago
it would be impossible for a jet airliner to penetrate three rings of the pentagon.
CosmoZorzi 2 years ago
I again have to say, what we saw hit the twin towers was television. Do you believe everything you see on television? If no plane hit the pentago, why should we assume that television showed what actually happened to the towers?
What hit the pentago, hit the towers.
eiffuy 2 years ago 5
eiffuy,
I don't watch TV. Haven't tuned into any shows or news in 3 years cause I've learned T.V. is designed to control public thought, actions and opinions. TV is also responsible for causing people to LIVE in FEAR while being brain washed by the media.
All I know is 9/11 was an inside job that was orchestrated by the US Government to bring forth the New World Order. I'm sure we both can agree on that base on the facts all over the Web. There were no hijackers or passengers.
RINGOTVHD 2 years ago
not if your fear less and strong minded
kcking23 2 years ago
You are so right Ringo! I be trying to get my mother not to believe every crap they saw on the News or TV Media ETC.....
Major2219 2 years ago
@RINGOTVHD
buttt, wat if it was a plane and your wrong. and seriously ,no tv.
CatAfroHorn 11 months ago
@eiffuy IDK what hit the Pentagon, But I saw each plane hit both towers as did millions in NYC.
61talya 1 year ago
Never thought about it, but nope, no Plane nowhere. Most of us were so shocked by the Towers that one just slipped right through. They could have told us a plane hit anything around that time
Rucker1980 2 years ago 6