So, people stupid enough to take Ann Coulter seriously actually exist? She's an actor, you dolt. Not knowing this is like not knowing professional wrestling is staged.
I've little goo to say about the New York Times, but tell me, little boy,Name one thing in the so called climatgate emails that in even the slightest way undermines the scientific validity of climate change. Make me laugh.
@ChadSmith1452 Moving past Ann Coulter - she is an actor, prone to histrionics, but she is worthy of being taken seriously. Let us get to "climate change". As you know back in the 1970's it was "Global Cooling". We were all going to freeze to death. Then the scientific community, a scant 30 years later said we got it horribly wrong it is "Global Warming". We are all going to burn.Then after 13 years straight of global cooling here in North America they decided that it is "CLIMATE CHANGE" OOPS!
Sigh...The stupidity of apes like you is simply flabbergasting. "As you know back in the 70's it was 'Global cooling'."
What is the referent of the article "it"? The scientific consensus If so,I know nothing of the sort, and neither do you, as this most definitely was not the case,
Quite the obverse, in fact.
Though in the 70's the evidence was of course fare more equivocal, there was already consensus among scientists that rising carbon level could potentially induce...
...what was then referred to as a runaway "greenhouse effect" And how does one determine this? What is the ONLY way to determine this? By conducting a metanalysis (look it up).
You're like a dog that can be made to run after a tennis ball that has not been thrown. You see George Will or John Stossel on TV holding up a 'Time' magazine cover from 1970 that says "New Ice Age" and that is enough to fool you. Guess what, you mental child; 'Time' is not a scientific journal...
...and George Will and John Stossel -and for that matter Al Gore- are NOT scientists.I am really unable to form any concept of what it must be like to be as dribblingly stupid as people like you. I try to imagine being very very drunk... I am absolutely serious in asking this:
...do you honestly not understand that the ONLY way to decide a scientific question, is to listen to the evidence, directly from the scientists themselves? Or is it just too far out of your way, and you just half-assedly assume your favorite FOX pundits got it right? Are you really just gullible, or just really lazy minded? "OOPS!"
If you've reading this sentence, I'd bet this is the most you've read in one sitting in years.
Brainiacs like you really need to learn what the fuck the scientific method is. You don't throw data out just because it doesn't fit your theory. You change the theory to fit the data. These Global Warming nuts threw out all but three trees in the data sample.Here's a link: speaktruthtoliberals.blogspot.com/2010/03/global-warming-debunking-resource-guide.html
@ChadSmith1452 The world reached its maximum temperature several years ago....meaning now it is in decline...the earth experiences cycles of heat and cool...it has only risen one degree in the last century. The arctic ice cap is growing and the polar ice cap can't start melting until the temperature in the antarctic reaches 1 degree Fahrenheit (salt water freezes at zero) and the temperature up there is still well below 0. And if it did melt, nothing would happen, it's already floating!
I. No. Not even fucking close. What are your sources, little boy? According to the the The NOAA and Nasa's Goddard research center, the last decade has been he warmest on record. The arctic capmost definitely is NOT growing and has shrunk by several hundred square miles over the past thirty years (I can easily give you hundreds of sources). As for arctic temperature having to reach zero (Centigrade) to diminish polarice,you obviously know absolutely nothing of physics....
II. Contrary to what you learned in eighth grade science class, little boy, there is no absolutely exact point at which matter suddenly transforms from a solid to a liquid. Water spilled on a floor for instance, does not have reach 100 degrees and boil to gradually evaporate.
You simply don't know what you're talking about, which, granted, is no crime. What ought to make you ashamed of yourseld is that you mindlessly repeat pseudoscintific gibberish like a parrot.
@ChadSmith1452 THE DECADE may have been the hottest, but the HOTTEST temperature WITHIN the decade has already happened...meaning every year the temperature has DECREASED from the hottest ANNUAL temperature. I can give you sources that show the arctic ice cap is not melting, there are hundreds of sources claiming global warming is real and hundreds of them that say there a myth.either way, suppose the north pole does melt....it's already floating!!! it won't cause the shorelines to rise...
So, people stupid enough to take Ann Coulter seriously actually exist? She's an actor, you dolt. Not knowing this is like not knowing professional wrestling is staged.
I've little goo to say about the New York Times, but tell me, little boy,Name one thing in the so called climatgate emails that in even the slightest way undermines the scientific validity of climate change. Make me laugh.
ChadSmith1452 1 year ago
@ChadSmith1452 Moving past Ann Coulter - she is an actor, prone to histrionics, but she is worthy of being taken seriously. Let us get to "climate change". As you know back in the 1970's it was "Global Cooling". We were all going to freeze to death. Then the scientific community, a scant 30 years later said we got it horribly wrong it is "Global Warming". We are all going to burn.Then after 13 years straight of global cooling here in North America they decided that it is "CLIMATE CHANGE" OOPS!
hughesling 1 year ago
@hughesling
I.
Sigh...The stupidity of apes like you is simply flabbergasting. "As you know back in the 70's it was 'Global cooling'."
What is the referent of the article "it"? The scientific consensus If so,I know nothing of the sort, and neither do you, as this most definitely was not the case,
Quite the obverse, in fact.
Though in the 70's the evidence was of course fare more equivocal, there was already consensus among scientists that rising carbon level could potentially induce...
ChadSmith1452 11 months ago
II.
...what was then referred to as a runaway "greenhouse effect" And how does one determine this? What is the ONLY way to determine this? By conducting a metanalysis (look it up).
You're like a dog that can be made to run after a tennis ball that has not been thrown. You see George Will or John Stossel on TV holding up a 'Time' magazine cover from 1970 that says "New Ice Age" and that is enough to fool you. Guess what, you mental child; 'Time' is not a scientific journal...
ChadSmith1452 11 months ago
III.
...and George Will and John Stossel -and for that matter Al Gore- are NOT scientists.I am really unable to form any concept of what it must be like to be as dribblingly stupid as people like you. I try to imagine being very very drunk... I am absolutely serious in asking this:
ChadSmith1452 11 months ago
IV.
...do you honestly not understand that the ONLY way to decide a scientific question, is to listen to the evidence, directly from the scientists themselves? Or is it just too far out of your way, and you just half-assedly assume your favorite FOX pundits got it right? Are you really just gullible, or just really lazy minded? "OOPS!"
If you've reading this sentence, I'd bet this is the most you've read in one sitting in years.
Troglodyte.
(look it up)
ChadSmith1452 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChadSmith1452 The term is drivel. Dumbass.
Brainiacs like you really need to learn what the fuck the scientific method is. You don't throw data out just because it doesn't fit your theory. You change the theory to fit the data. These Global Warming nuts threw out all but three trees in the data sample.Here's a link: speaktruthtoliberals.blogspot.com/2010/03/global-warming-debunking-resource-guide.html
Learn something.
theunbubba 11 months ago
@ChadSmith1452 The world reached its maximum temperature several years ago....meaning now it is in decline...the earth experiences cycles of heat and cool...it has only risen one degree in the last century. The arctic ice cap is growing and the polar ice cap can't start melting until the temperature in the antarctic reaches 1 degree Fahrenheit (salt water freezes at zero) and the temperature up there is still well below 0. And if it did melt, nothing would happen, it's already floating!
puffball9 9 months ago
@puffball9
I. No. Not even fucking close. What are your sources, little boy? According to the the The NOAA and Nasa's Goddard research center, the last decade has been he warmest on record. The arctic capmost definitely is NOT growing and has shrunk by several hundred square miles over the past thirty years (I can easily give you hundreds of sources). As for arctic temperature having to reach zero (Centigrade) to diminish polarice,you obviously know absolutely nothing of physics....
ChadSmith1452 8 months ago
@ChadSmith1452
II. Contrary to what you learned in eighth grade science class, little boy, there is no absolutely exact point at which matter suddenly transforms from a solid to a liquid. Water spilled on a floor for instance, does not have reach 100 degrees and boil to gradually evaporate.
You simply don't know what you're talking about, which, granted, is no crime. What ought to make you ashamed of yourseld is that you mindlessly repeat pseudoscintific gibberish like a parrot.
ChadSmith1452 8 months ago
@ChadSmith1452 THE DECADE may have been the hottest, but the HOTTEST temperature WITHIN the decade has already happened...meaning every year the temperature has DECREASED from the hottest ANNUAL temperature. I can give you sources that show the arctic ice cap is not melting, there are hundreds of sources claiming global warming is real and hundreds of them that say there a myth.either way, suppose the north pole does melt....it's already floating!!! it won't cause the shorelines to rise...
puffball9 8 months ago
love ann coulter
rigatony019 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mann Coulter is one dumb worthless RepubliCUNT.
sage0857 2 years ago
why is that , comrade??
why dont you give an example or 2
ObamaIsABolshevik 2 years ago