The black boxes do NOT have serial numbers NONE of them. I just talked to someone who was in the air force and knows all about black boxes and the electronics ( fighter jets ) and explained about how the boxes can be exchanged from one plane to the next but NOT without the proper doc and numbers being documented of the exchange. the serial numbers are used to translate the data and are to be on the DCA, BTW the DCA is DCA01MA065 for said plane.
To finish up at this time the RKOwens videos have closed hundreds of thousands of documented comments due to a certain poster who also shut down a 4 yr, 70,000 comment video that NBC blocked due to the poster leaving personal phone numbers and address. I warned of this at the other videos ( I seen it coming ), Also I do very little PM. Everything must be done in a public forum. My page has nothing on it because all I do is use it for commenting, hope some of this helps, thank you.
I have yet to confirm a time but could have been this plane due to its location that morning.
Also the said phone call that Edward Felt made of the smoke is interesting. Research the time it was made ( which locates the plane) and the 911 connection point. The story gets quit bizarre with what happened in the 911 office.Also his brother is head of the 93 9/11 memorial.
you think it was headed for WTC 7 ? That looks on the kook side of things to me. I do like what you have to say.
BUT why no pictures of such ? The 95 % claim - I have asked for about a year or so to see anything a link, doc etc. And the only response I get is the reporters story of the FBI said so.
Does it mean 95% of the plane ? or 95% of what was in the hole ? I have seen some lab reports of the documents said to be found there. The reason for my interest in 93 is because I know a first hand person that seen two fighter jets with "a plane" that morning at a certain Lat. and Long. Cont.
Cont. Then made mention of the strange blast pattern and that the FBI took control of his backhoe then told me he had to go. I had to give him my name where I was from and why I was calling him before he would talk. Now I question these quotes. The cock pit broke off and flopped into the woods, the tail near by that flopped, the entire engine that was found 600 yds. away, the landing gear with the fuselage down by the pond.I believe these parts were found
@Rys2sense I see you are very busy and may not want to create an exchange. I called a person years ago ( he was one of the first people on the site for said N591UA s/n 28142/718 aka Air Canada flight AC 4085 as flight 93 out of gate 17 from Newark to San Fran with wheels off the ground on record as 8:28 AM ( not 8:42 due to delays OV ) the conversation was tense and short. I asked him what he had seen. He made mention of seeing one (1 ) pc. about 3 ft. round the rest was very small pcs. Cont.
the mayor of shanksville is himself on record as stating there was no plane there. 95% of the plane WASNT recovered and is just another lie to smokescreen everything. the dumpster often shown one third full of metal parts wouldnt hold a house being demolished, let alone an 80 ton plane. its all bull from the start to finish and bush is a war criminal.
Here ya go dipshit! Take a read of this, and then stick it up your ass. I'll bet you and Rivero at WRH are both jewish shills. I'm not fooled by your acting.
c'mon ryan. the pictures of those plane "scraps" are not shown in the hole at shanksville. they could just as well have been taken in my back yard. the planes at shanksville and the pentagon were over 1/2 a football field long, you can get the specs on the 757-200 at boeingdotcom. there should be LOTS of aluminum, and 2 wings, 2 huge engines, a massive landing gear, a tail, 200 seats, wiring, luggage, bodies...even the shanksville mayor said there was no plane. you need to rethink this.
A friend of mine who's brother was on Flt. 93 told me shortly after they went to the White House to hear the Flt. voice recorder said the White House was the target.
I was shown logs that flight 93 landed in Cincinnati Ohio.... but i guess the conspiracies have finally shit on themselves to make it all not even worth the glance anymore....
Hi Dawson, I agree with your reasoning, but the crash site does look different than others I've seen. Even planes that flew straight into a mountain at full throttle usually leave bigger pieces. Who knows what attitude and speed the plane had when it plowed into the ground if it was being remote controlled, but we can't rule out the possibility of additional explosive devices being present onboard, if the plane had been rigged for remote control, it could have been rigged for that.
Flight 77 -" they could have been told it was a drill, there were war games like that going on." -RYS2SENSE
Passengers told they are in a drill? Are there passenger informed drills since 9/11/01 ? !
Flight 93 - "The reason the crash is so much different that other crashes is because in other natural crashed the pilots put the landing gear down and at least attempt to land the plane."-RY2SENSE
This your explanation for the missing wings? Stop the ridiculous assumptions.
plane crashed into old 90's google earth gash , just a couple of blocks from a metal scrap yard, nobody hears a plane or impact including the mayor.
Even Michelle Malkin at the scene was disturbed, said the scene was weird and not reported correct. She backslides a week later and becomes a gatekeeper
(USGS) United States Geological Survey of Shanksville, Pa showing impact gash in 1995.
The plane wings sliced into 1995 gash perfectly in a steep nose dive w/o wings sheering off ?
In Pa, the terrorist red bandana scarf survived like Atta's pristine passport which flew from his pocket thru the fireball and into the street where FBI discovered it.
Only complete fucktards still believe that there were planes used on 9-11. To deny the evidence of TV fakery at this point is to deny reality. If Ryan really believes that aluminum planes can make plane shaped holes in the side of steel and concrete buildings, may I suggest he watched too much Road Runner as a kid or is some kind of government shill - since they love to make shitloads of vids.
The small turbine hub photoed next to the fireman's leg is from the global Hawk, the photos of which are available even to the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. the photos of the Global hawk wing are available to the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. The A-3 engines, much smaller than 757 engines are in numerous photographs, available to the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. And articles concerning the nukes installed back in the 1960s are available for review by the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. Find them or shh!!
You are full of shid. Nukes in basement. Two star general Stubblebine's photos are Pentagon interior shots and prove a truckload of 757 parts and two A-3 engines and a wing and engine parts from a Global Hawk. Under stress, people make mistakes in what they see. I have examined all the Rys2sens photos and Dawson's analysis is lacking and tainted by arrogance. The 2nd and third floor were dropaway(see photos)and two A-3(way too small for a 757) engines,one outside intact andone inside bustedup
im open, but my theory has been that there was a high tech bomb in the plane that blew it to bits. if that was the case it must of been an inside job because unless it's smaller than a boxcutter they couldn't of got it on the plane.
Another argument in favor of remote control: self-preservation. A lot has been made of the "suicide bomber" mentality, but what isn't talked about is how often they chicken out. Doesn't make the news, of course.
Yet here we have three successful attempts out of four. No turning around for another pass, no hesitation. You combine that with the improbability of Flt. 77's approach on the Pentagon or the fact that the one plane almost missed the South Tower (strongly suggesting RC) and...
@nokilli Remote control planes would be a horrible idea. Way too many things could go wrong - namely that the plane wouldn't be able to penetrate a steel and concrete building, or would miss it entirely.
Way easier to use the same military controlled TV that faked moon landings. People believe anything they see on TV, even shit that's entirely made up. Fake the planes - fake everything, and then just shout down anyone who uses common sense.
@MoneyIsSilver Remote control doesn't affect the plane's velocity or mass. It penetrates steel and concrete just the same.
And Flt. 175 did almost miss the south tower. Better than 50 miles visibility that day (I was there), and they can't visually line up with the tower given all of that time? No way.
@nokilli Don't embarrass yourself by proving in your comments that you never took high school physics or at least don't understand Newton's 3rd law.
Thin aluminum is much softer than steel box columns and concrete. A real plane would have smashed against the side of the WTC - only perhaps the engines (made of titanium) might have penetrated the building. The idea that aluminum wings filled with jet fuel can slice through concrete is only for the severely mentally retarded.
@MoneyIsSilver if it was just stupidity we were dealing with here we wouldn't have a problem !
The fact is it is manipulated group consciousness (mass hypnosis) people tend to believe what the rest of the herd thinks.
The forces of darkness are controlling what is thought by using emotional control. By sacrificing 3000 odd (again) they instill enough anger that nobody stops to think they just want revenge, and so another war etc is justified.
@RadioPsiHAWKlogCent0 Its definitely mass hypnosis, of course, weaker minds are more susceptible to mass hypnosis.
This may sound weird, but read Thomas Paine's paper on fiat currency. He actually predicted that valueless currency would result in today's situation. Basically, that a currency and wealth based on fraud would extend into intellect based on fraud and moral relativism. There is no objective reality to most people - reality is what the TV guy tells them it is.
One thing we can be sure of is it wasn't a bunch of cavemen with boxcutters that pulled it off. 911 was the kickoff for the hastened removal of rights and freedoms along with an excuse to conduct a string of illegal wars to bankrupt the US. It was also used to generate hatred towards the muslim world. They are planning more false flags to build on that hatred. I like your channel man but you fall short underestimating these people. They are Luciferians. Their "god" is Lucifer. It is the occult.
@Rys2sense Almost every aspect of 911 can be argued by two or more sides. The facts themselves are confusing to which has been added intentional disinformation. (Maybe when we saw the second plane hit, we really saw a plane hit.)
The one fact that hurts me, is that fighters had been scrambled to follow hijackings for four decades. Washington was closed airspace long before 911, and fighter were scrambled on all incursions. 911 and what happened? No fighters. AGH! What have you found?
@Rys2sense Did you miss the video of Cheney admitting that he made the call to shoot 93 out of the sky to prevent another strike? just search Cheney, admits, flight 93.
Keep your change cuz I'm not buying this. Your evidence is very weak. How do you know the alleged parts found are not planted, not to mention the witnesses? The videos/pics could easily be fabricated. What is your source? MSM? I'm not interested in your FEELINGS, I need proof, otherwise just say you don't know. You're making the same mistake the guys from Loose Change did. Keep searching, you can do better. As of now I'm more prone to believe in the no-plane theory for this and the Pentagon.
I heard an interview from a source of questionable credibility say that remote operation was accomplished with amplified signals and that cell phones were thus made operational where they ordinarily would not have been.
ryan, i love your work, i agree with most everything you say, and i subscribe and share your videos consistently. but until i see a picture or a video of a plane at the pentagon, i'm gonna believe it was a missile. a shred of aluminum is not the same as a plane that is half a football field long, and an aluminum nose cone is not gonna survive the impact and continue to break thru 6 walls. have a cool day!
The time between the first attack (8:45am Eastern American Air Flight 11 hits North Tower) and the Crash in Pennsylvania (10:06am Eastern United Flight 93) is 1 Hour and 21 Minutes.
It's pretty safe to assume after 3 attacks using Commercial Airliners taking place over an hour, that the Air Force was shadowing Flight 93.
Please show me some pics of your hypothesis. Until now, I have seen no pics of a plane at Pentagon nor shanksville. Your last showed how they covered the Pentagon with smoke or steam but you did not show the real photos that you said were photoshopped. I have yet to see a real plane evidence of the pentagon. Also, the planers for the pentagon are usual suspects of coverups
I'm inclined to believe that these people who "saw" the plane coming down are paid actors, just like all the Network Execs who just happened to see the planes hit the towers... were lying and others were just plain old actors, paid for their performance. Ry, I think your anger with the punks making 9/11 movies has forced your opinion on this. Don't be "baited" by anyone. Don't be sidetracked arguing "no planes"... keep exposing the demons who want to rule us. Best 2 you.
I always said thi was to hit building 7. Of course it had to be. The establishment were going to say they were targeting all the alphabet agencies, located in building seven, that are there to keep our country and it's citizens safe.
props and take a few shots myself. and they found debris within if i recollect 2 miles radius? that's certainly far more than a bullet shot from kalashnikov. no fucking way any part of a plane could fly that far if the plane made actual contact with the ground. and many people on the scene said- no bodies, no plane parts so either they were paid actors, their statements erre taken out of context or there were actually no parts/bodies which would be another close miracle of that day. go figure
It's that exit hole Ry, and no sheared off wings in front of the building. How could there possibly be no huge sections of (super light) aluminum wings? How could the nose of the plane (super soft aluminum) shear through reinforced concrete walls and pillars and remain intact enough to make the round exit hole--several walls later? That hole wasn't made by any wheel assembly or engine. AND where is the plane at Shanksville? Did it melt? Vaporize? You're missing this one. But GREAT WORK!
yeah but why risk missing the pentagon with the plane? the missing pentagon money might have as well funded 911 and even if not it certainly would lead to other very interesting places. so was it auto-piloted? that dude couldn't have pulled it off and certainly the neocons wouldn't rely on his pilotage skills. have you debunked what the coroner said at the flight93 scene? rkoowens tried but he simply lied misquoting the coroner. the pics of the debris can't be taken too seriously- i could make
but uh....im only guessing...and stating what the script readers told us. Maybe WTC7 was a target...but why would islamic radicals target a building that was just as valuable as WTC3 or 6. Only NYers knew it was a fed building with spooks runnin round...
WTC7?? Why would you think that? The MSM said it crashed into camp david. They even went on to say how that target MAKES SENSE...XD,because sept 11th was the anniversary of the Camp David peace accords between israel and palestine. Sheesh....so wrapped up in fighting the no planers, you forget there was a script and it was read to half the united states before they realized 93 didnt reach its target.Camp david was destroyed for about 10 minutes.WTC7 was probably supposed to come down with WTC1
The black boxes do NOT have serial numbers NONE of them. I just talked to someone who was in the air force and knows all about black boxes and the electronics ( fighter jets ) and explained about how the boxes can be exchanged from one plane to the next but NOT without the proper doc and numbers being documented of the exchange. the serial numbers are used to translate the data and are to be on the DCA, BTW the DCA is DCA01MA065 for said plane.
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
To finish up at this time the RKOwens videos have closed hundreds of thousands of documented comments due to a certain poster who also shut down a 4 yr, 70,000 comment video that NBC blocked due to the poster leaving personal phone numbers and address. I warned of this at the other videos ( I seen it coming ), Also I do very little PM. Everything must be done in a public forum. My page has nothing on it because all I do is use it for commenting, hope some of this helps, thank you.
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
I have yet to confirm a time but could have been this plane due to its location that morning.
Also the said phone call that Edward Felt made of the smoke is interesting. Research the time it was made ( which locates the plane) and the 911 connection point. The story gets quit bizarre with what happened in the 911 office.Also his brother is head of the 93 9/11 memorial.
you think it was headed for WTC 7 ? That looks on the kook side of things to me. I do like what you have to say.
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
BUT why no pictures of such ? The 95 % claim - I have asked for about a year or so to see anything a link, doc etc. And the only response I get is the reporters story of the FBI said so.
Does it mean 95% of the plane ? or 95% of what was in the hole ? I have seen some lab reports of the documents said to be found there. The reason for my interest in 93 is because I know a first hand person that seen two fighter jets with "a plane" that morning at a certain Lat. and Long. Cont.
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
Cont. Then made mention of the strange blast pattern and that the FBI took control of his backhoe then told me he had to go. I had to give him my name where I was from and why I was calling him before he would talk. Now I question these quotes. The cock pit broke off and flopped into the woods, the tail near by that flopped, the entire engine that was found 600 yds. away, the landing gear with the fuselage down by the pond.I believe these parts were found
cont.
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
@Rys2sense I see you are very busy and may not want to create an exchange. I called a person years ago ( he was one of the first people on the site for said N591UA s/n 28142/718 aka Air Canada flight AC 4085 as flight 93 out of gate 17 from Newark to San Fran with wheels off the ground on record as 8:28 AM ( not 8:42 due to delays OV ) the conversation was tense and short. I asked him what he had seen. He made mention of seeing one (1 ) pc. about 3 ft. round the rest was very small pcs. Cont.
asicit2b 2 weeks ago
I love your videos Ryan but this time I disagree...I saw a video of Chaney admitting that they shot down the plane...
SUZ4SURE 3 weeks ago
the mayor of shanksville is himself on record as stating there was no plane there. 95% of the plane WASNT recovered and is just another lie to smokescreen everything. the dumpster often shown one third full of metal parts wouldnt hold a house being demolished, let alone an 80 ton plane. its all bull from the start to finish and bush is a war criminal.
vengencefrom1979 3 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Here ya go dipshit! Take a read of this, and then stick it up your ass. I'll bet you and Rivero at WRH are both jewish shills. I'm not fooled by your acting.
w...opinion-maker(dot)org/2012/01/aa-exposes-bushs-big-lie-flight-11-did-not-fly-on-911/#
koreancook1 3 weeks ago
c'mon ryan. the pictures of those plane "scraps" are not shown in the hole at shanksville. they could just as well have been taken in my back yard. the planes at shanksville and the pentagon were over 1/2 a football field long, you can get the specs on the 757-200 at boeingdotcom. there should be LOTS of aluminum, and 2 wings, 2 huge engines, a massive landing gear, a tail, 200 seats, wiring, luggage, bodies...even the shanksville mayor said there was no plane. you need to rethink this.
grandmacaesar 3 weeks ago 4
A friend of mine who's brother was on Flt. 93 told me shortly after they went to the White House to hear the Flt. voice recorder said the White House was the target.
1eyednewt 3 weeks ago
I was shown logs that flight 93 landed in Cincinnati Ohio.... but i guess the conspiracies have finally shit on themselves to make it all not even worth the glance anymore....
Sindrake 3 weeks ago
Several of your videos showing your thyroid enlarged. You should get out of Japan as soon as possible or you and your family will die of cancer.
Ron Paul will not be the next president and your flight 93 crash site video is nothing more than wishful creativity.
I wish my comment would be more optimistic but unfortunately the World's corruption is at point of no return.
fasterthanlight4you 3 weeks ago
Hi Dawson, I agree with your reasoning, but the crash site does look different than others I've seen. Even planes that flew straight into a mountain at full throttle usually leave bigger pieces. Who knows what attitude and speed the plane had when it plowed into the ground if it was being remote controlled, but we can't rule out the possibility of additional explosive devices being present onboard, if the plane had been rigged for remote control, it could have been rigged for that.
nihilistsneedhugstoo 3 weeks ago
what about the tv report that shows the plane debris spread across a couple of 100 feet on houses and stuff? I saw it.
MustacheVerra 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Flight 77 -" they could have been told it was a drill, there were war games like that going on." -RYS2SENSE
Passengers told they are in a drill? Are there passenger informed drills since 9/11/01 ? !
Flight 93 - "The reason the crash is so much different that other crashes is because in other natural crashed the pilots put the landing gear down and at least attempt to land the plane."-RY2SENSE
This your explanation for the missing wings? Stop the ridiculous assumptions.
halliburtoncrusher 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
halliburtoncrusher 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
halliburtoncrusher 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
halliburtoncrusher 3 weeks ago
plane crashed into old 90's google earth gash , just a couple of blocks from a metal scrap yard, nobody hears a plane or impact including the mayor.
Even Michelle Malkin at the scene was disturbed, said the scene was weird and not reported correct. She backslides a week later and becomes a gatekeeper
euro944t 3 weeks ago
@euro944t
(USGS) United States Geological Survey of Shanksville, Pa showing impact gash in 1995.
The plane wings sliced into 1995 gash perfectly in a steep nose dive w/o wings sheering off ?
In Pa, the terrorist red bandana scarf survived like Atta's pristine passport which flew from his pocket thru the fireball and into the street where FBI discovered it.
euro944t 3 weeks ago
@euro944t
watch?v=CuNyfuhaUU4
1995 gash in ground before and after. You decide.
euro944t 3 weeks ago
passengers tried to take control and the plane was shot down
fakeham 3 weeks ago
whats your take on the movie UNITED 93?
jadedfeelings21 3 weeks ago
Only complete fucktards still believe that there were planes used on 9-11. To deny the evidence of TV fakery at this point is to deny reality. If Ryan really believes that aluminum planes can make plane shaped holes in the side of steel and concrete buildings, may I suggest he watched too much Road Runner as a kid or is some kind of government shill - since they love to make shitloads of vids.
MoneyIsSilver 3 weeks ago
Where is the plane? Where is the luggage? Where are the passengers?
Oh, it all berried itself in the ground and quickly rusted?!
And government reports are to be trusted?
What about the low level radiation hot-spsots found in NY after 9/11.
Do you believe the higher levels of tritium found in the ground water after 9/11 was from rifle sights and exit signs?!
What about the guns in the police museum from building 6, that are encased in melted cement? You can't even melt cement with thermite!
rongrite 3 weeks ago
The small turbine hub photoed next to the fireman's leg is from the global Hawk, the photos of which are available even to the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. the photos of the Global hawk wing are available to the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. The A-3 engines, much smaller than 757 engines are in numerous photographs, available to the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. And articles concerning the nukes installed back in the 1960s are available for review by the short-tempered Ryan Dawson. Find them or shh!!
howardtlewisiiiify 3 weeks ago
You are full of shid. Nukes in basement. Two star general Stubblebine's photos are Pentagon interior shots and prove a truckload of 757 parts and two A-3 engines and a wing and engine parts from a Global Hawk. Under stress, people make mistakes in what they see. I have examined all the Rys2sens photos and Dawson's analysis is lacking and tainted by arrogance. The 2nd and third floor were dropaway(see photos)and two A-3(way too small for a 757) engines,one outside intact andone inside bustedup
howardtlewisiiiify 3 weeks ago
This music is disturbing
mhoyer01 3 weeks ago
im open, but my theory has been that there was a high tech bomb in the plane that blew it to bits. if that was the case it must of been an inside job because unless it's smaller than a boxcutter they couldn't of got it on the plane.
Gooodwitch 3 weeks ago
Another argument in favor of remote control: self-preservation. A lot has been made of the "suicide bomber" mentality, but what isn't talked about is how often they chicken out. Doesn't make the news, of course.
Yet here we have three successful attempts out of four. No turning around for another pass, no hesitation. You combine that with the improbability of Flt. 77's approach on the Pentagon or the fact that the one plane almost missed the South Tower (strongly suggesting RC) and...
nokilli 3 weeks ago
@nokilli Remote control planes would be a horrible idea. Way too many things could go wrong - namely that the plane wouldn't be able to penetrate a steel and concrete building, or would miss it entirely.
Way easier to use the same military controlled TV that faked moon landings. People believe anything they see on TV, even shit that's entirely made up. Fake the planes - fake everything, and then just shout down anyone who uses common sense.
MoneyIsSilver 3 weeks ago
@MoneyIsSilver Remote control doesn't affect the plane's velocity or mass. It penetrates steel and concrete just the same.
And Flt. 175 did almost miss the south tower. Better than 50 miles visibility that day (I was there), and they can't visually line up with the tower given all of that time? No way.
nokilli 3 weeks ago
@nokilli Don't embarrass yourself by proving in your comments that you never took high school physics or at least don't understand Newton's 3rd law.
Thin aluminum is much softer than steel box columns and concrete. A real plane would have smashed against the side of the WTC - only perhaps the engines (made of titanium) might have penetrated the building. The idea that aluminum wings filled with jet fuel can slice through concrete is only for the severely mentally retarded.
MoneyIsSilver 3 weeks ago 2
@MoneyIsSilver Top Comment !!
I always stress this point to those that need to wake up.
Aluminum IS softer than steel and concrete and the faster it is moving the more it will breakup when it hits.
If real planes had been used there would be debris all over New York.
Peace ;-)
RadioPsiHAWKlogCent0 3 weeks ago 4
@RadioPsiHAWKlogCent0 Thank you! Its nice to know that someone else on here has some common sense. IT trips me out just how stupid people are.
MoneyIsSilver 3 weeks ago
@MoneyIsSilver if it was just stupidity we were dealing with here we wouldn't have a problem !
The fact is it is manipulated group consciousness (mass hypnosis) people tend to believe what the rest of the herd thinks.
The forces of darkness are controlling what is thought by using emotional control. By sacrificing 3000 odd (again) they instill enough anger that nobody stops to think they just want revenge, and so another war etc is justified.
RadioPsiHAWKlogCent0 3 weeks ago 2
@RadioPsiHAWKlogCent0 Its definitely mass hypnosis, of course, weaker minds are more susceptible to mass hypnosis.
This may sound weird, but read Thomas Paine's paper on fiat currency. He actually predicted that valueless currency would result in today's situation. Basically, that a currency and wealth based on fraud would extend into intellect based on fraud and moral relativism. There is no objective reality to most people - reality is what the TV guy tells them it is.
MoneyIsSilver 3 weeks ago
All you need to know about America in a nutshell:
Several months ago I discussed tower 7 with an acquaintance. Her reaction when I brought up the subject?
"OMG are you serious----there were THREE buildings destroyed that day?"
Her profession? Public school teacher.
No shit.
soonerdave01 3 weeks ago
One thing we can be sure of is it wasn't a bunch of cavemen with boxcutters that pulled it off. 911 was the kickoff for the hastened removal of rights and freedoms along with an excuse to conduct a string of illegal wars to bankrupt the US. It was also used to generate hatred towards the muslim world. They are planning more false flags to build on that hatred. I like your channel man but you fall short underestimating these people. They are Luciferians. Their "god" is Lucifer. It is the occult.
Meathead36 3 weeks ago
I still don't understand why (if the planes were remote controlled) flight 93 crashed there and failed to hit it's mark...
getupkid238 3 weeks ago
@getupkid238 didn't read the description did you. if they couldn't control them they had to crash it there.
Rys2sense 3 weeks ago
@Rys2sense Almost every aspect of 911 can be argued by two or more sides. The facts themselves are confusing to which has been added intentional disinformation. (Maybe when we saw the second plane hit, we really saw a plane hit.)
The one fact that hurts me, is that fighters had been scrambled to follow hijackings for four decades. Washington was closed airspace long before 911, and fighter were scrambled on all incursions. 911 and what happened? No fighters. AGH! What have you found?
sallybaker1950 3 weeks ago
@Rys2sense Did you miss the video of Cheney admitting that he made the call to shoot 93 out of the sky to prevent another strike? just search Cheney, admits, flight 93.
carfxr123 2 weeks ago
@getupkid238 Remote control implies losing control. Plane gets out of range, or there's a radio problem.
And so thing ends up plowing into a hill upside down. Nobody was in control.
nokilli 3 weeks ago
wing shaped holes were in the ground pre 911.
/watch?v=rUzrHHDu96U
lullabomb 3 weeks ago
Keep your change cuz I'm not buying this. Your evidence is very weak. How do you know the alleged parts found are not planted, not to mention the witnesses? The videos/pics could easily be fabricated. What is your source? MSM? I'm not interested in your FEELINGS, I need proof, otherwise just say you don't know. You're making the same mistake the guys from Loose Change did. Keep searching, you can do better. As of now I'm more prone to believe in the no-plane theory for this and the Pentagon.
TheHiddenMatrix 3 weeks ago 5
I heard an interview from a source of questionable credibility say that remote operation was accomplished with amplified signals and that cell phones were thus made operational where they ordinarily would not have been.
33115566 3 weeks ago
@Rys2sense So you're saying the passengers actually subdued 'the terrorists' and brought the plane down?
krumbumm 3 weeks ago
So, what about the flight recording? Was it ever released?
krumbumm 3 weeks ago
So, what about the flight recording? Was it ever released?
krumbumm 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That sounds like a carnival ride like not any other! One I could surely live without
noblsht 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
noblsht 3 weeks ago
if flight #93 was intended for building #7
then why was it way the hell out in western pennsylvania?
come on ry ... where are the wings and the body of the airplane?
why weren`t any of the airplanes put together for forensic studies in warehouses?
halliburtoncrusher 3 weeks ago
@halliburtoncrusher Lost control.
And of course all of the evidence that couldn't be suppressed had to be destroyed. No (real) investigations allowed. That would include forensics.
nokilli 3 weeks ago
america is full of actors! just look on tell a vision!
cantore35 3 weeks ago
ryan, i love your work, i agree with most everything you say, and i subscribe and share your videos consistently. but until i see a picture or a video of a plane at the pentagon, i'm gonna believe it was a missile. a shred of aluminum is not the same as a plane that is half a football field long, and an aluminum nose cone is not gonna survive the impact and continue to break thru 6 walls. have a cool day!
grandmacaesar 3 weeks ago 5
Hey, Ry...what's ur 2 cents on the cell phone calls?
damagebf 3 weeks ago
The time between the first attack (8:45am Eastern American Air Flight 11 hits North Tower) and the Crash in Pennsylvania (10:06am Eastern United Flight 93) is 1 Hour and 21 Minutes.
It's pretty safe to assume after 3 attacks using Commercial Airliners taking place over an hour, that the Air Force was shadowing Flight 93.
Bare minimum.
SHEEPLEwhisperer 3 weeks ago 2
Please show me some pics of your hypothesis. Until now, I have seen no pics of a plane at Pentagon nor shanksville. Your last showed how they covered the Pentagon with smoke or steam but you did not show the real photos that you said were photoshopped. I have yet to see a real plane evidence of the pentagon. Also, the planers for the pentagon are usual suspects of coverups
sharkattack1313 3 weeks ago
That has a certain ring of truth. Why would Silverstein say 'pull it' if it wasn't ready to be brought down - by that plane. Makes sense.
mutexnet 3 weeks ago
I'm inclined to believe that these people who "saw" the plane coming down are paid actors, just like all the Network Execs who just happened to see the planes hit the towers... were lying and others were just plain old actors, paid for their performance. Ry, I think your anger with the punks making 9/11 movies has forced your opinion on this. Don't be "baited" by anyone. Don't be sidetracked arguing "no planes"... keep exposing the demons who want to rule us. Best 2 you.
sixstringthing1 3 weeks ago
But 0% dead bodies
kicktroolinface 3 weeks ago 18
I always said thi was to hit building 7. Of course it had to be. The establishment were going to say they were targeting all the alphabet agencies, located in building seven, that are there to keep our country and it's citizens safe.
sallyos06460 3 weeks ago
Nice point at the end!
thumminxy 3 weeks ago
props and take a few shots myself. and they found debris within if i recollect 2 miles radius? that's certainly far more than a bullet shot from kalashnikov. no fucking way any part of a plane could fly that far if the plane made actual contact with the ground. and many people on the scene said- no bodies, no plane parts so either they were paid actors, their statements erre taken out of context or there were actually no parts/bodies which would be another close miracle of that day. go figure
andyOsalek 3 weeks ago
It's that exit hole Ry, and no sheared off wings in front of the building. How could there possibly be no huge sections of (super light) aluminum wings? How could the nose of the plane (super soft aluminum) shear through reinforced concrete walls and pillars and remain intact enough to make the round exit hole--several walls later? That hole wasn't made by any wheel assembly or engine. AND where is the plane at Shanksville? Did it melt? Vaporize? You're missing this one. But GREAT WORK!
sixstringthing1 3 weeks ago 3
@sixstringthing1
yup
zmc33 3 weeks ago
vaposization of planes similar to vaporization of corzine's mf global billion dollars and body of binladin
jamphellhamo 3 weeks ago 13
yeah but why risk missing the pentagon with the plane? the missing pentagon money might have as well funded 911 and even if not it certainly would lead to other very interesting places. so was it auto-piloted? that dude couldn't have pulled it off and certainly the neocons wouldn't rely on his pilotage skills. have you debunked what the coroner said at the flight93 scene? rkoowens tried but he simply lied misquoting the coroner. the pics of the debris can't be taken too seriously- i could make
andyOsalek 3 weeks ago
but uh....im only guessing...and stating what the script readers told us. Maybe WTC7 was a target...but why would islamic radicals target a building that was just as valuable as WTC3 or 6. Only NYers knew it was a fed building with spooks runnin round...
FreedumbFighter28 3 weeks ago
WTC7?? Why would you think that? The MSM said it crashed into camp david. They even went on to say how that target MAKES SENSE...XD,because sept 11th was the anniversary of the Camp David peace accords between israel and palestine. Sheesh....so wrapped up in fighting the no planers, you forget there was a script and it was read to half the united states before they realized 93 didnt reach its target.Camp david was destroyed for about 10 minutes.WTC7 was probably supposed to come down with WTC1
FreedumbFighter28 3 weeks ago 2