Tobias Churton - The True Story of the Rosicrucians-Part-1.avi

[jimd144]

John Dee was the original and only "007" for her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth. 007 was his signature.

[jimd144]

Some believe Francis Bacon, who was an illegitimate son of Queen Elizabeth, not only created the founders of the Rosicrucians and Freemasons, and translated the King James Bible, but was Shakespeare in disguise the whole time! He may have reincarnated as Sarah Winchester as the Winchester Mystery House is a tribute to him, Shakespeare, Rosicrucianism, and Free Masonry, and is located very near the North American Temple of the Rosicrucian, which is located less than 5 miles away.

[jimd144]

@jimd144 In other words, Br. C. R. was Francis Bacon aka Shakespeare!

[RBNightlinger]

Mystical crap.

[chrischris180]

:21 meth cookin?

[MrMojoTao]

Excellent.

Thank You.

[jay91fray]

Time Bombs, wow what a great way to explain to my family and friend why I buy antique books. I obtain the book "Lamp Of The Soul" By McDANIEL ROSICRUCIAN SERIES.............I new nothing about Rosicrucian before this video and going to learn more, thanks for uploading

[2skullscrushing]

Luciferic occultists.

[tahuti6]

@2skullscrushing The only difference between you and us, is that we actually know what the word "Luciferic" means... and you still think it's the Devil's first name. lulz

[2skullscrushing]

@tahuti6 no, the only important difference is you have no place in the resurrection, because your worship of dark matter spirit. enjoy your scoffing while you can.

[tahuti6]

@2skullscrushing I'm not scoffing. Don't get me wrong. I'm only pointing out the our main difference is interpretation. You read an English bible that is full of translational quirks due to the fact that Latin doesn't fit Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic in any direct way, so words like "Lucifer" become likened to things that they do not mean. I am a Rosicrucian, and I can translate the original text directly, so I actually know that Lucifer has absolutely NOTHING to do with Satan. That makes me evil?

[tahuti6]

@2skullscrushing Instead of judging others for what you do not understand, try opening your heart and mind and giving a listen. Observe our deeds and see if they are not Christlike. Kneeling and praying, attending Church, and paying tithes does not constitute being Christlike. Following Christ is not a matter of technicality, it is an ACTION. If you believe that salvation comes from saying some magic words or getting dunked in a bathtub, then you are more lost than any sinner that you judge.

[2skullscrushing]

@tahuti6 And where do you assume all of that from? you think I would comment, if I thought the established church had anything to do with salvation? Or baptism? Its about truth. The nature of evil, the battle between the two, and How to know what is and isnt righteous in the eyes of God. all religions are misinterpretations of the gospel of christ. The new testament was the testimony holding the key to future events at hand. You can follow whatever you want, as for me, I know what i'm doing.

[tahuti6]

@2skullscrushing Where I get it is from your reference to a resurrection that wasn't even a Christian concept until a couple hundred years ago. The concept is an evangelical INVENTION, consisting of a smattering of sparse and unrelated scripture taken out of context. You are reacting to RELIGIOUS programming, not biblical revelation. What is RIGHTEOUS is to throw off the shackles of dogma and seek DIVINE TRUTH from within, just as Christ instructed. That IS what a Rosicrucian does. Judge NOT!

[tahuti6]

@2skullscrushing Furthermore... I do NOT follow anything but the divinity that I experience DIRECTLY. It does not require a book. Christ taught that very thing, but if you're stuck on some mistranslated WORDS that were written by PEOPLE, then how can you be following that? You may think that you KNOW, but what I'm seeing here is BELIEF. A belief is NOT knowledge... so don't say that you KNOW, and then shame others for seeing something that you apparently don't. Salvation = Illumination

[Ghostpocalypse]

@tahuti6 The Vatican is one of the most evil societys ever created. you got your beliefs from more people being killed over the centuries than during the holocaust. if christ was so real who come they had to kill millions of people to make them believe. open your eyes.

[tahuti6]

@Ghostpocalypse Seriously? Did you read ANYTHING that was written above? I'm clearly NOT Catholic, NOR am I a follower of ANY organized religion, seeing as religion is a debilitating force.

[tahuti6]

@2skullscrushing Occult is a Latin word meaning: Hidden. It has nothing to do with evil.

[zurichdublin188]

@tahuti6

I agree with you totally on the meaning of Occult. "Hidden". But I also think there has to be a mystical, or supernatural force behind it.

It is a powerful word, which invokes awe/fear/power. This is the reason I use it.

But...realistically there is something to this stuff...so it is the perfect description. No other words describes it properly.

Esoteric: that's close

Mysticism: that's close but too weak

Spiritual: not really...

Supernatural: kind of...

[taaraka1]

“He who takes it upon himself to see us merely out of curiosity will never make contact with us. But if his inclination seriously impels him to register in our fellowship, we, who are judges of intentions, will cause him to see the truth of our promises; to the extent that we shall not make known the place of our meeting in this city, since the thoughts attached to the real desire of the seeker will lead us to him and him to us.”

[rockman2561]

Excellent

I used to have a feind here Truxx who would have liked this.

[soundzgreg]

yet shall we never be manifested unto any man unless God should favour it, yea,

[docravinsky]

Has anyone ever seen copies of the Tobias Churton series "The Gnostics" from  Channel4 circa 1984. I've got the book but would love to see the Tv programmes.

[andyastro1]

^,!&,!(*)

[TullioWalker]

I'm sorry, but this is not about Rosicrucians. Any discussion around who was Christian Rosenkreuz already demonstrates that the book was written by someone outside wanting to see what's inside. We must first understand what is CR, not "who" was he. The book loses its way and remains much time analyzing pseudo-Rosicrucian movements, as derived from Freemasonry. As long as McIntosh's book, this is just speculation. It's very hard to write the history of a people who wish to remain in discretion.

[josey875]

@TullioWalker

Thanks, Tullio. That´s it! Too much speculation. The book in question, as you say, analyzes pseudo-Rosicrucians and tells notihing about the true rosicrucianism . I would advise people to read the two-volume "The Alchemical Wedding of Christian Rosycross" by Jan van Rijckenborgh, published by the Rozekruis-Pers - Haarlem - The Netherlands.

Jess

[tahuti6]

@josey875 Some historians dispute the authorship of that text, or that it is even Rosicrucian at all. I can easily recognize it as an alchemical allegory describing the exact process, and therefore must conclude that the supposed teenage author could not have actually written it, despite his claim, which is the ONLY evidence anyone has ever had... personally I believe it was a group effort. Any Rosicrucian Order is only an outer order. Pseudo-Rosicrucian may be overstating it, but RC is hidden.

[phnixlady]

Just the subject I was contemplating, thank you.

[Tigerpaws9097826]

I really like this documentary; there's a substantial amount of history clearly presented in just this short 10-minute segment. Thank you for making it available.

[jbizzel03]

what song is playing around 2:00 min in and on? SO GOOD !!

[zurapDOR]

@jbizzel03

It's Trois Gnociennes part 1 by Eric Satie

[NeuroParadise]

thanx 4 posting!