This is directed soley to Mark Fuhrman. If you can prove to the world that your alibi on the night of the murders is 100% true beyond any doubt, i personally will give you or your charity 10,000 dollars.
If his wife became aware of his extra-marital affair(s), why would she back up his alibi? Was she ever questioned? You couldn't make up this stuff (what a web of intrigue). I think OJ's son, Jason, was also an overlooked suspect. This particular story of Fuhrman and planting of false evidence is possible......for the sake of argument, if Fuhrman was involved, what better way to exonerate himself than to plant false evidence and blame O.J.
@SpeakFreeTV: Fuhrman never testfied in the grand Jury. In the prelim, On July 5 1994,
section 0064, line 18 he said this: There's an iron fence and through that iron 19 fence you can get very close to the male victim. And 20 looking there I could see them down at his feet.
Thanks for your comment but I rather everyone focus on why they all covered for Fuhrman, when they all knew he was lying about where he was at the time of the MURDERS!
@SpeakFreeTV That's absurd. One slip of the tongue by a cop does not ruin a case. OMG, this is what is wrong with America and our system. People who cannot reason. OJ's blood was found at the scene, next to his very rare size 12 Bruno Magli shoe prints, and he had a deep cut on his left hand that same night and says he didn't know how he cut it. Only OJ wanted her dead. Moreover, he recently confessed to Oprah, and said Nicole had a knife pulled on him at the door, which started everything.
For those who say OJ was "tracking blood" into his house, let's correct that error right now. They found 1 sock with a VERY tiny spot of blood. How tiny? It could only have been made by using a needle that had been dipped in the blood. Here's why: Side 1 of the sock had a very tiny spot. Side 2 (the immediate inside) had a smaller spot. Side 3 had an even tinier spot. The spots lined up perfectly. How could blood go through OJ's foot to the other side so perfectly? Impossible! Side 4: no blood!
Please direct your comments to the contents of the video. Its important that we stay focused on the fact as to why Fuhrman lied about his alibi. Regardless of how anyone feels about OJS guilt or innocence, lets demand to know why they let Fuhrman get away with his false alibi.
Try and find someone who wasn't incompetent and didn't lie at this trial. Everyone knew going in there was money to be made so they all became actors. The only non bullshit was the blood. Follow the blood and you'll find it was OJ was who dripped it around while it was fresh.
@videoizer Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that there were alot of people who lied, just to make some money off these horrrible murders. If the "only non bullshit was the blood", as you say, then how can you trust it, if in your opinion, they all lied?
@ROBERTSINNEWYORK The victims blood didn't follow OJ around by itself, it was in his car, in his hallway, on his socks, etc... add the shoes, gloves, timeline, etc... and take into consideration all those other suspected horrible murderers, oops sorry, I don't think there are any other suspects, are there? Maybe Mark Fuhrman did it, he's covering up something... isn't he? Or maybe he was just holding back info for his book...
Anyway... I still think the blood tells the only truth.
@videoizer Wrong. OJ was not bleeding at the crime scene. If he had been, then there would surely have been at least ONE DROP of his blood on at least one of the bodies. Instead, none of his blood was on either of the victims because their bodies were in the morgue at the time the blood was planted... by elements of the LAPD. SImpson voluntarily gave a sample of his blood when he returned to LA from Chicago. 1/3 of that blood was later found to be missing!
@DeedsResearcher you doink, he cut himself climbing over the fence sneaking back into his house, he was not bleeding at the crime scene. But he did track both Ron & Nicoles blood back into his house and it was in/on his car.
@videoizer According to the limo driver, he went through the front door into his house at Rockingham. The bronco, which had not been seen, was now seen by the driver and others. Supposedly, they charged he had been cut during the scuffle, but that was not true. Nobody saw him bleeding during that evening: not the driver, nor anyone at the airport or on the plane.
@videoizer Do you understand that the reason why I posted this video is not to get into a pissin contest about the blood. This is about Fuhrman, and how they covered the fact he lied about where he was during the murders!!!
@videoizer "doink" is a word used by juveniles. Grow up, sonny!
Drops of OJ's blood were found at the crime scene. A witness who found the drops used a telestrator to show exactly where they were: close together and in a fairly straight line, and then nothing until the fence. Anyone at the crime scene could have tracked Ron & Nicole's blood.
My guess is that you didn't watch the trial. I did, thanks to my VCR.
@ROBERTSINNEWYORK, I remember this, The prosecution acted as if Mark Furhman was really going to help there case. In a situation like this being a racist white cop isn't beneficial and can only make matters worse, I knew OJ. Simpson was going home at that point.
@MrCovering Thanks for your comment. Yes Fuhrman was, and probably still is a racist. To this day, Fuhrman denies he did anything wrong in this case. The fact is, he lied about where he was at the time of the murders, He cant be in Pamona and at home, in Redondo Beach, at the same time. This needs to be front and center news! Fuhrman, as you heard, knows exactly what happened that night. The DA, buried the fact, he had a relationship with Niciole. This is on my posting too
@bigbiggityben You might have to turn up your volume on the computer. I have external speakers, so im able to boost the volume higher than the computer output. If its to low, let me know, and ill repost it with better footage.
O.J. Simpson committed the murders.
rocky7777ize 2 weeks ago
@rocky7777ize Oh really? 10,000 is alot of money. Why do you think Fuhrman is avoiding this offer to him?
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 2 weeks ago
This is directed soley to Mark Fuhrman. If you can prove to the world that your alibi on the night of the murders is 100% true beyond any doubt, i personally will give you or your charity 10,000 dollars.
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 2 months ago
If his wife became aware of his extra-marital affair(s), why would she back up his alibi? Was she ever questioned? You couldn't make up this stuff (what a web of intrigue). I think OJ's son, Jason, was also an overlooked suspect. This particular story of Fuhrman and planting of false evidence is possible......for the sake of argument, if Fuhrman was involved, what better way to exonerate himself than to plant false evidence and blame O.J.
petrulengo 7 months ago
@petrulengo As far as i know, Fuhrmans wife was asleep at the time and took Fuhrmans word for it, that he was at home.
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 7 months ago
Comment removed
robsnhawaii 10 months ago
Was Furhman lying did he plant the glove?
79Testo 1 year ago
@79Testo: Focus on WHERE FUHRMAN REALLY DROVE TO AFTER HE LEFT LA QUINTA RESORT.
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
Comment removed
robsnhawaii 1 year ago
In the Grand Jury testimony he said and I quote " I found them, I mean it " refering to the gloves. O.J. should have never went to trial.
I haven't beenable to find the clip. But I remember watching it live. I you can find it? send it to me. ty.
SpeakFreeTV 1 year ago
@SpeakFreeTV: Fuhrman never testfied in the grand Jury. In the prelim, On July 5 1994,
section 0064, line 18 he said this: There's an iron fence and through that iron 19 fence you can get very close to the male victim. And 20 looking there I could see them down at his feet.
Thanks for your comment but I rather everyone focus on why they all covered for Fuhrman, when they all knew he was lying about where he was at the time of the MURDERS!
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
@SpeakFreeTV That's absurd. One slip of the tongue by a cop does not ruin a case. OMG, this is what is wrong with America and our system. People who cannot reason. OJ's blood was found at the scene, next to his very rare size 12 Bruno Magli shoe prints, and he had a deep cut on his left hand that same night and says he didn't know how he cut it. Only OJ wanted her dead. Moreover, he recently confessed to Oprah, and said Nicole had a knife pulled on him at the door, which started everything.
DexterHaven49 7 months ago
For those who say OJ was "tracking blood" into his house, let's correct that error right now. They found 1 sock with a VERY tiny spot of blood. How tiny? It could only have been made by using a needle that had been dipped in the blood. Here's why: Side 1 of the sock had a very tiny spot. Side 2 (the immediate inside) had a smaller spot. Side 3 had an even tinier spot. The spots lined up perfectly. How could blood go through OJ's foot to the other side so perfectly? Impossible! Side 4: no blood!
DeedsResearcher 1 year ago
I also wondered why this was buried from the main steam media. This is a blockbuster!
robsnhawaii 1 year ago
Please direct your comments to the contents of the video. Its important that we stay focused on the fact as to why Fuhrman lied about his alibi. Regardless of how anyone feels about OJS guilt or innocence, lets demand to know why they let Fuhrman get away with his false alibi.
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
Try and find someone who wasn't incompetent and didn't lie at this trial. Everyone knew going in there was money to be made so they all became actors. The only non bullshit was the blood. Follow the blood and you'll find it was OJ was who dripped it around while it was fresh.
videoizer 1 year ago
@videoizer Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that there were alot of people who lied, just to make some money off these horrrible murders. If the "only non bullshit was the blood", as you say, then how can you trust it, if in your opinion, they all lied?
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
@ROBERTSINNEWYORK The victims blood didn't follow OJ around by itself, it was in his car, in his hallway, on his socks, etc... add the shoes, gloves, timeline, etc... and take into consideration all those other suspected horrible murderers, oops sorry, I don't think there are any other suspects, are there? Maybe Mark Fuhrman did it, he's covering up something... isn't he? Or maybe he was just holding back info for his book...
Anyway... I still think the blood tells the only truth.
videoizer 1 year ago
@videoizer Your opinion is noted, thank you.
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
@videoizer Wrong. OJ was not bleeding at the crime scene. If he had been, then there would surely have been at least ONE DROP of his blood on at least one of the bodies. Instead, none of his blood was on either of the victims because their bodies were in the morgue at the time the blood was planted... by elements of the LAPD. SImpson voluntarily gave a sample of his blood when he returned to LA from Chicago. 1/3 of that blood was later found to be missing!
NOT GUILTY. Correct verdict!
DeedsResearcher 1 year ago
@DeedsResearcher you doink, he cut himself climbing over the fence sneaking back into his house, he was not bleeding at the crime scene. But he did track both Ron & Nicoles blood back into his house and it was in/on his car.
Now whats your verdict?
videoizer 1 year ago
@videoizer According to the limo driver, he went through the front door into his house at Rockingham. The bronco, which had not been seen, was now seen by the driver and others. Supposedly, they charged he had been cut during the scuffle, but that was not true. Nobody saw him bleeding during that evening: not the driver, nor anyone at the airport or on the plane.
Not guilty.
DeedsResearcher 1 year ago
@videoizer Do you understand that the reason why I posted this video is not to get into a pissin contest about the blood. This is about Fuhrman, and how they covered the fact he lied about where he was during the murders!!!
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
@videoizer "doink" is a word used by juveniles. Grow up, sonny!
Drops of OJ's blood were found at the crime scene. A witness who found the drops used a telestrator to show exactly where they were: close together and in a fairly straight line, and then nothing until the fence. Anyone at the crime scene could have tracked Ron & Nicole's blood.
My guess is that you didn't watch the trial. I did, thanks to my VCR.
Still: Not Guilty!
DeedsResearcher 1 year ago
@ROBERTSINNEWYORK, I remember this, The prosecution acted as if Mark Furhman was really going to help there case. In a situation like this being a racist white cop isn't beneficial and can only make matters worse, I knew OJ. Simpson was going home at that point.
MrCovering 1 year ago
@MrCovering Thanks for your comment. Yes Fuhrman was, and probably still is a racist. To this day, Fuhrman denies he did anything wrong in this case. The fact is, he lied about where he was at the time of the murders, He cant be in Pamona and at home, in Redondo Beach, at the same time. This needs to be front and center news! Fuhrman, as you heard, knows exactly what happened that night. The DA, buried the fact, he had a relationship with Niciole. This is on my posting too
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
Is there an audio problem?
bigbiggityben 1 year ago
@bigbiggityben You might have to turn up your volume on the computer. I have external speakers, so im able to boost the volume higher than the computer output. If its to low, let me know, and ill repost it with better footage.
ROBERTSINNEWYORK 1 year ago
@ROBERTSINNEWYORK
No, it's not you. I think that I've eliminated so programs to make room on my computer and may have gone a bit too far.
bigbiggityben 1 year ago