Why would anyone believe this ugly whore after the lies she told so american troops had a reason to invade Iraq, Iran has,nt attacked anyone in nearly 300 years,Yet america has attacked dozens of countries,There the only country to use nuclear weapons,Murdering thousands of innocent people in the process,They used depleted uranium in Iraq,Bombed Homes,Hospitals,e.t.c,Raped Children & Murdered Millions of innocent people & they have the cheek to say Iran is a threat to peace, Fucking Scumbags.
I don't see how any nation can develop any trust between them for as long as there remains parallel agendas. For as long as people and politicians do not speak with their own mind instead of themselves the problems will continue and go on. Then there is the issue of "liar" label, if she is a liar and labelled so by some, many of you, haven't you ever lied? How can you ever develop trust? everybody tries to grow nuclear without pot and the pot is TRUST.
If one day, the Islamic world is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now, then the imperialists' strategy will reach a standstill because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality. (December 2001)[31] (Hashemi Rafsanjani, former President of Iran, on expediency council of Iran, Considered a Moderate)
i'm hungry to eat rice, not to mention being a good grammarian with a touch of the british accent, even though she came fron the south, a backward accent area as far as the english language is concerned
rize needs tobe under bushes desk more often thats maybe why her teeth is so white and he eyes are twisted they say iran armed that other nation close to iraq or in iraq.all bs usa probley did that to say that iran did it so usa can start a war with iran,that will be the biggest mistake ever if u attack iran and for wat do they want to blow up iran they did nothing maybe the usa should try and fight the shit thats going on in the government in the usa
Cool. If Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice can isolate Iran from the international financial system, then perhaps the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution will be that much closer to seeing their goal collapse. Let freedom prevail in Persia, ending the regime of Ali Khamenei and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
A country that threatens an innocent country that is not bothering them must not have nuclear weapons . In fact we should remove all of Irans military ability. Destroy all bases and all equipment.
How fair of the US is it to say - "Hey, you can't have any of these bombs. WE can all have them, but trust us, you can't handle it." Where exactly in the Constitution is that designated as one of our government's responsibilities to the world?
Iran or North Korea possessing nuclear weapons would cause their neighbors to initiate their own nuclear programs. This would destabilize the Middle East and Eastern Asia. Would it be fair for the US to allow turmoil and belligerent states to gain a nuclear advantage over their non-belligerent neighbors? The US's possession of nuclear weapons has not initiated a weapons race with its neighbors in the Western Hemisphere.
If you are a strict constitutionalist then you would oppose the vast majority of the federal government's current power. The US has the moral authority to protect those who cannot protect themselves by preventing oppressive regimes from acquiring destabilizing power through nuclear weapons. We are not "determining what's best" for them. We are preventing a theocracy (that has threatened Israel with total destruction) and an militaristic dictatorship (which invaded S Korea) from gaining + power.
First, all of your initial points have been completely refuted.
Second, in your digression are suggesting that since Israel has a military that can defend itself against its aggressive neighbors, that we should allow Iran develop nuclear weapons which WILL prompt the Israelis to defend themselves by attacking Iran? Through your objection you are making a statement equivalent to "I know Person A does X it will cause Person B to fight, but since person B can fight we can't morally stop A from X.
belligerent neighbours? didn't the US initiate hostilities between Iraq and Iran in the 1980's, and overthrow what was a non-belligerent state in 1953. If the US's role is to not encourage weapons proliferation why would they invade a defenseless country, basically intructing nations to defend themselves in order to avoid regime change.
1.) US in Guatemala was wrong. 2.) The US didn't start the Iran-Iraqi war, it was Saddam in a border conflict.
Through these examples its clear that you have completely missed my point which is that US acquisition nuclear power did not threaten the securtiy of its neighbors in the Western hemisphere.
3.) Is the "defenseless country" that you refer to Iraq or Guatemala?
the defenseless country was quite obviously Iraq, in fact it says something that you had to draw up a mental short list of defenseless coutries the US has attacked. So much for the presumption that the US should be "fair" and not "allow" certain countries to develop nuclear weapons. Since when has foreign policy been based on fairness. You take a lot for granted, as long as you do there is no point discussing wider points if you're going to focus on footnotes that fit your world view.
As for your main point, why is it relevant? Firstly the US did threaten its neighbours, take a look south of the border. They're threatening Venezuala right now, by your logic therefore they shouldn't have nuclear weapons, threatening a neighbour? US/Russian proliferation nearly destroyed the entire species. You need to be more principled in your opposition to nuclear weapons..
there is no sense in discussing anything with sim sim salim201 if you clearly illustrate anything, even as simplistic that a 3 yr old can understand he will just change the subject and start calling you names, king of the ad-hominems
he doesn't represent my constituency, how would you know who I voted for anyway? In what way is he a traitor, presumably nick clegg, tony benn, and people like correlli barnett and general Rose are all traitors too?
hmmm I guess taking 300 000 pounds directly from Sadaam that was supposed to be the "oil for food" money. TO CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE WAR IN IRAQ doesn't count eh?
This cherry picking nuclear disarmament policy just isn't going to fly. Only the Bush admin would be arrogant and shortsighted enough not to realize that.
Israel is an affluent nuclear power who is quite capable to defending herself... and capable to starting wars on her own. Aside from Israel's nuclear capability and affluence, America already gives her $4 billion/year. Adding to this, we're already dying, killing and paying for two other wars. We simply don't have the money, lives or need to fight Israel's war for her. ...or any other country's war right now. Let's get Israeli influence out of our government. It's killing us and our economy.
For more on Dr. Rice see my video "Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9/11 Widows"
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
Why would anyone believe this ugly whore after the lies she told so american troops had a reason to invade Iraq, Iran has,nt attacked anyone in nearly 300 years,Yet america has attacked dozens of countries,There the only country to use nuclear weapons,Murdering thousands of innocent people in the process,They used depleted uranium in Iraq,Bombed Homes,Hospitals,e.t.c,Raped Children & Murdered Millions of innocent people & they have the cheek to say Iran is a threat to peace, Fucking Scumbags.
smallyb2009 1 year ago
if this hot lady will still be the state secretary, iran won't say a single word
valentino533 1 year ago
She has to be the most intelligent woman alive and i want her to have my baby.
MaDmOnkyKungFu 1 year ago
But DAMN she's hot!
Pounder47 2 years ago 4
This crap could have gone on for many more years effectively, aragance rule the majority till the shit appeared on their doorsteps.
greenplanets 2 years ago
go condi
cz040188 2 years ago
@cz040188 Is she your sista???
arakhachatran 1 year ago
fearful
sunshineflag 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck you Condoleezza Rice you stupid cunt
skymandavid 2 years ago
I think she would make a good president
danshappy 2 years ago
you obvioulsy odn't know just how many lies she told to start wars, but then again only a liar would vote for a liar.
hbk711x 2 years ago
fuck this bitch she has been caught tellIng us the american people lies! FUCK RICE!
militantrebell 2 years ago 3
I don't see how any nation can develop any trust between them for as long as there remains parallel agendas. For as long as people and politicians do not speak with their own mind instead of themselves the problems will continue and go on. Then there is the issue of "liar" label, if she is a liar and labelled so by some, many of you, haven't you ever lied? How can you ever develop trust? everybody tries to grow nuclear without pot and the pot is TRUST.
siobelaup 3 years ago
You just do not like Dr Rice because your a racist you cannopt handle the fact that a black woman is the smartest person in DC
spinningstarr 3 years ago
bravo spinningstarr! go get a cookie now,,,
bugogorac 2 years ago
that was kind of an obvious statment LOL got a oatmeal cookie anyway
spinningstarr 2 years ago
It is evident you secretly enjoy reports of crimes committed by the Israeli army. It makes you feel better about all those experiments...
Paperclip2000 3 years ago
I love Condi, her beautiful face, her sexy body, her silky skin and her beautiful long legs.
God protect Condi.
Well you have nothing to say, want this delicate beautiful woman punish (?), But Condi is under the protection of God!
I love Condi, her beautiful face, her sexy body, her silky skin and her beautiful long legs.
God protect Condi.
Kimyong666 3 years ago
she is a FOOL and a lier. pathetic too.
makohnen 3 years ago 3
Condi is a beautiful sweet Angel.I love this Lady,my lovely dream woman Condi.Condi,my darling,my lovely goddess!!!
Well you have nothing to say, want this delicate beautiful woman punish (?), But Condi is under the protection of God!
Kimyong666 3 years ago
If one day, the Islamic world is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now, then the imperialists' strategy will reach a standstill because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality. (December 2001)[31] (Hashemi Rafsanjani, former President of Iran, on expediency council of Iran, Considered a Moderate)
jimiydoorshamelech 3 years ago
i'm hungry to eat rice, not to mention being a good grammarian with a touch of the british accent, even though she came fron the south, a backward accent area as far as the english language is concerned
Nnfefe 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
damn rite jalen2222
fuck the VETS and FUCK MCCAIN
McCaine is a WHITEY!! Whitey has turned their backs on us before, they WILL do it again !!!
Farrakan / Rev Wright/ Obama 08
Time for some real change
neoKonscioius 3 years ago
rize needs tobe under bushes desk more often thats maybe why her teeth is so white and he eyes are twisted they say iran armed that other nation close to iraq or in iraq.all bs usa probley did that to say that iran did it so usa can start a war with iran,that will be the biggest mistake ever if u attack iran and for wat do they want to blow up iran they did nothing maybe the usa should try and fight the shit thats going on in the government in the usa
terrencejj69 3 years ago
this is a smart bitch but she's on the wrong team
lilslim83 3 years ago
What do you think the United States would say if someone told them they couldn't have Nuclear weapons?
dalejrfan800 3 years ago
They'd label them as.."THE NEEWW TERRORRRR...THEY LIVE IN YOUR ATTIC...SHIT IN YOUR SOUP...WE MUST DESTROY THEM!"
craigbee 3 years ago
Condolezza, the warrior princess
phonedial9 3 years ago
In the last 48 hours have been hearing that Ms. Rice is McCain's choice for VP? Could this be true?
agnesmoorhead 3 years ago
Condoleezza Rice has a super big penis.
templar4life 3 years ago
Cool. If Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice can isolate Iran from the international financial system, then perhaps the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution will be that much closer to seeing their goal collapse. Let freedom prevail in Persia, ending the regime of Ali Khamenei and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
cangeloc127 3 years ago
A country that threatens an innocent country that is not bothering them must not have nuclear weapons . In fact we should remove all of Irans military ability. Destroy all bases and all equipment.
lovesend54 3 years ago
lol read back the first line. of course the US does none of the threatening!
salim201 3 years ago
NOE FREEDOMGO TO HELL!!!!
J.A.
mohalbarcelony 3 years ago
security council not meet god princips?
or god not meet security council??S.A.
mohalbarcelony 3 years ago
Condi has lost some weight under pressure from her conscience.
Hesam0000 3 years ago
How fair of the US is it to say - "Hey, you can't have any of these bombs. WE can all have them, but trust us, you can't handle it." Where exactly in the Constitution is that designated as one of our government's responsibilities to the world?
jrobertsonub 3 years ago
Iran or North Korea possessing nuclear weapons would cause their neighbors to initiate their own nuclear programs. This would destabilize the Middle East and Eastern Asia. Would it be fair for the US to allow turmoil and belligerent states to gain a nuclear advantage over their non-belligerent neighbors? The US's possession of nuclear weapons has not initiated a weapons race with its neighbors in the Western Hemisphere.
nobodydobo 3 years ago
Once again, where do we have constitutional authority to determine what's best for the middle east and eastern asia?
jrobertsonub 3 years ago
If you are a strict constitutionalist then you would oppose the vast majority of the federal government's current power. The US has the moral authority to protect those who cannot protect themselves by preventing oppressive regimes from acquiring destabilizing power through nuclear weapons. We are not "determining what's best" for them. We are preventing a theocracy (that has threatened Israel with total destruction) and an militaristic dictatorship (which invaded S Korea) from gaining + power.
nobodydobo 3 years ago
Oh, so Isreal can't protect themselves? I beg to differ. Great contradiction there.
jrobertsonub 3 years ago
First, all of your initial points have been completely refuted.
Second, in your digression are suggesting that since Israel has a military that can defend itself against its aggressive neighbors, that we should allow Iran develop nuclear weapons which WILL prompt the Israelis to defend themselves by attacking Iran? Through your objection you are making a statement equivalent to "I know Person A does X it will cause Person B to fight, but since person B can fight we can't morally stop A from X.
nobodydobo 3 years ago
belligerent neighbours? didn't the US initiate hostilities between Iraq and Iran in the 1980's, and overthrow what was a non-belligerent state in 1953. If the US's role is to not encourage weapons proliferation why would they invade a defenseless country, basically intructing nations to defend themselves in order to avoid regime change.
salim201 3 years ago
1.) US in Guatemala was wrong. 2.) The US didn't start the Iran-Iraqi war, it was Saddam in a border conflict.
Through these examples its clear that you have completely missed my point which is that US acquisition nuclear power did not threaten the securtiy of its neighbors in the Western hemisphere.
3.) Is the "defenseless country" that you refer to Iraq or Guatemala?
nobodydobo 3 years ago
the defenseless country was quite obviously Iraq, in fact it says something that you had to draw up a mental short list of defenseless coutries the US has attacked. So much for the presumption that the US should be "fair" and not "allow" certain countries to develop nuclear weapons. Since when has foreign policy been based on fairness. You take a lot for granted, as long as you do there is no point discussing wider points if you're going to focus on footnotes that fit your world view.
salim201 3 years ago
As for your main point, why is it relevant? Firstly the US did threaten its neighbours, take a look south of the border. They're threatening Venezuala right now, by your logic therefore they shouldn't have nuclear weapons, threatening a neighbour? US/Russian proliferation nearly destroyed the entire species. You need to be more principled in your opposition to nuclear weapons..
salim201 3 years ago
@nobodydobo
there is no sense in discussing anything with sim sim salim201 if you clearly illustrate anything, even as simplistic that a 3 yr old can understand he will just change the subject and start calling you names, king of the ad-hominems
chachieb 3 years ago
ad hominems are under-rated, and btw what is this, bigots unite?
salim201 3 years ago
In the case that were true who are you uniteing with?
chachieb 3 years ago
I get the feeling you haven't actually read any of my comments
salim201 3 years ago
You never made any comments on digg, you just signed up in order to vote for the traitor, George Galloway, that's about all I need to know about you.
chachieb 3 years ago
he doesn't represent my constituency, how would you know who I voted for anyway? In what way is he a traitor, presumably nick clegg, tony benn, and people like correlli barnett and general Rose are all traitors too?
salim201 3 years ago
hmmm I guess taking 300 000 pounds directly from Sadaam that was supposed to be the "oil for food" money. TO CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE WAR IN IRAQ doesn't count eh?
chachieb 3 years ago
by the way it shows on digg who votes for what story
chachieb 3 years ago
what story did I vote for?
salim201 3 years ago
YOU KNOW DAMN RIGHT!
chachieb 3 years ago
i don't?
salim201 3 years ago
YOU KNOW DAMN RIGHT! ,,, you bastard
chachieb 3 years ago
what are you talking about?
salim201 3 years ago
you try to confuse,, you know damn right and I am going to call the police.
chachieb 3 years ago
you're a wierdo
salim201 3 years ago
SHE DID! SHE DID! She's lying to you,,, F'king guy!!
chachieb 3 years ago
you've succeeded in making this a farce
salim201 3 years ago
you never tell me to f"uck,,!!!!
your daughter kick my dog and now I'm going to f'uck her!
chachieb 3 years ago
Israel is an affluent nuclear power who is quite capable to defending herself... and capable to starting wars on her own.
salim201 3 years ago
quite capable of wiping Islam "off the map" if the first nuke hit her. The Jews would be killed off but not after a MASSIVE retaliation.
chachieb 3 years ago
I know what you're on about even if they don't - "You're daughter, she kicked me dog...fucking guy!"
craigbee 3 years ago
Condi=puppet
AspasiaByName 3 years ago
This cherry picking nuclear disarmament policy just isn't going to fly. Only the Bush admin would be arrogant and shortsighted enough not to realize that.
neotoy 3 years ago
Israel is an affluent nuclear power who is quite capable to defending herself... and capable to starting wars on her own. Aside from Israel's nuclear capability and affluence, America already gives her $4 billion/year. Adding to this, we're already dying, killing and paying for two other wars. We simply don't have the money, lives or need to fight Israel's war for her. ...or any other country's war right now. Let's get Israeli influence out of our government. It's killing us and our economy.
proteanview 3 years ago