First Moon landing - NASA restored video footage - Apollo 11 - July 20, 1969

[HelliPilot]

The russians know usa landed on the moon they monitored the whole trip. never heard russia say "moon landing was a hoax" did you? Its because they know it to be a fact , to think this was a conspiracy is just ridiculous. I have seen the so called evidence and its all just vague bullshit, I have even gone so far as to examine the physics of the moon sands action as astronauts hopped across the lunar landscape and it is impossible to recreate that environment on Earth to cause that effect.

[AroundSun]

@HelliPilot you can't talk to these morons. Anything that doesnt follow suit with their dopey theory is instantly dismissed. They don't care about the truth.

[malumo4a]

nice video man :) i love it :)

[KaitlinRenae28]

who thinks we went to the moon?

[nestor123567]

@KaitlinRenae28 u actually think we didnt? how much proof do u need? testimonies, video footage, rock samples, radio transmissions, ffs grow up.

[JCredible86]

HAS ANYBODY EVER SEEN ANY NON NASA/US MOON FOOTAGE?

[nestor123567]

@JCredible86 NASA FILMED IT...

[AroundSun]

@JCredible86 Yes!! I have seen footage of my friends on the moon!!

SMH

[5haman]

/watch?v=bZPCHbKKK-g



[jcgmed]

Real images are softer, not sharper.

Great job to remember one of the most remarkable moments of mankind.

[VEGETADTX]

@jcgmed

Its nice of you to praise it, cause you obviously believe it happened.

However there are a lot of other people who believe its the most disgraceful moment of mankind by simply being a hoax.

I am one of them.

But oh, opinions are opinions, I would just love to see the justice come for all of us someday, whether I'm wrong about this or not, just let the justice come for all of us...and it will...I've been proven that so many times...its almost a law of physics.

[jcgmed]

@VEGETADTX Just like you have just said, opinions are opinions, and I dont think all you wrote can be excluded from that.

Hoax believers should reciprocate all the attention given to their evidences, which in your case is just an optical aberration.

Now, if an optical aberration is an " evidence " of hoax, it is a good demonstration about hoax believers are able to do whatever in order to make the people believe Apollo missions were nothing but a forgery.

[VEGETADTX]

@jcgmed

Sure everybody's opinion is just an opinion, you keep fighting for what you believe in and I'll keep fighting for believe in.

But nobody here talks about some optical illusion, I talk about PHYSICALLY SUPPORTED optical fact which proves that the shot that NASA declares as their proud photograph taken on the moon on the sunlight without any extra lights is simply FAKE and done in studio using an ordinary studio spot light.

That IS A DIRECT proof right there...not he said she said.

[jcgmed]

@VEGETADTX I dont think you have proved nothing about nothing now that, as a self deified God Of Optics, you can't even stablish the main differences between optical illusions and optical aberrations.

[VEGETADTX]

@jcgmed Hahaha "nobody here talks about....I talk about" HAHAHA :D I just realized that I replied to the comments where I didn't previously point any proofs at all...sorry my mistake :D

But still the fact is the same...we do have few DIRECT proofs, physically proven, whoever wants to avoid them feel free, I don't want to run away from truth.

[jcgmed]

@VEGETADTX yep, all we know that hoax believers are willing to be the judges and prosecutors at the same time, now they have the pseudojustice supporting the pseudoscience, quite interesting !

[komodoman]

NASA are such goofballs, the co-called restored footage is SOFTER not sharper. Yes, it's free of specs and such, and a little brighter, but it's just another attempt to fool the world.

[MassTransit999]

Cliche First Response to this video....

"FAKE MOON LANDING HOAX!!!!!!!!" :)