His scam pattent are available on the net, just build the idiocy so you see it aint working, in fact nobody even loose the time building it cause it is a scam, water cannot be use as a fuel,
hydrogen sure can, like the previous comment go learn some physic, and he wasnt killed, wel conspirationist like that shit but if he was killed to keep the process secret why are the plan available on the internet lol
Stanley Meyer used an injector in place of the spark plug. Fed by water and pulsed with high frerquency electric spark that cracked H=O=H into Brown's gas premix in part and the atomized water droplets would expand violently as steam upon ignition of the premix and then provide implosive power when the steam cooled. ??Correct??
One of the hallmarks of idiocy is when people have the nerve to argue in areas where they have NO EXPERTISE.
All of you people who INSIST that this isn't a scam: If you're so dedicated to this cause, have the decency to GET A DEGREE IN PHYSICS so you can know what you're talking about. Then you will learn about COVALENT BONDS and how they work. Then you will clearly see how this is a scam.
The only type of physicist who would back this scam would be a liar who is in on the scam to make money.
@UncleIrv2 i would believe it to be real..im no chemist but ive toyed around with hho generators in my garage and have built one that produces over 1lpm wich does help fuel economy wihtout draining or killing my battery or alternator..so if im some dumb hick who can do this with half rate parts for under $100 with a hs diploma and next to no knowledge of science learning as i go,then why cant the govnt with billions of $ come up with something better? guess im just gullible..
@UncleIrv2 seems to me that u have wasted alot of time and effort geting degrees in order to make other people look stupid because you bitter about something..i dont need a degree to know that what i have built with my own two hands has a pos effect without having to buy more stuff(batteries alternators ect.) in order to compensate for the "lost energy used in producing...ur car alternator generally makes more than u need in wich is just wasted so why not make it more effecient?
@UncleIrv2 u wanna call everyone else morons damning this..but dont offer any of you super knowlegde of physics showing how to be more effecient..such a downer man!
In water, the BOND between H and O atoms has a certain energy level. That energy level NEVER CHANGES.
You need to input THAT EXACT AMOUNT of energy (in the form of electricity) to break that molecular bond. When you reassemble the molecules into water (by burning the H) THAT EXACT SAME AMOUNT of energy is released. So you end up with NO NEW ENERGY.
Except that some energy is WASTED due to inefficiency. So you have a NET ENERGY LOSS.
Clearly the WFC does not split or fuse atoms, but unless you thoroughly examine the state of the energy in vs. the energy out, then you cannot say it is impossible based purely on a dogmatic recital of the laws of physics.
I can't say that the WFC definitely works or not, because I have not built one - which is the only way I could be sure. But for the so-called "science educated" people on here who are claiming it is a perpetual motion machine, which violates the laws of thermodynamics, there is something you are forgetting. There is a large quantity of energy available at an atomic level, so maybe the WFC was able to use a small amount of this energy...cont
It has been proven and is every where on you-tube that you can make your own converter for less than $200.00 . I have seen several cars using it and it works so why is it so hard to belive one that runs completly on hydrogen come on wake up people. Pull your head out of your asses and relize your government works for big oil. You sheep!!!!
Cars don't run on water, it runs off hydrogen, you stupid fuck. And you can convert water into hydrogen for 10 dollars. your just a stupid fuck that didn't pay attenton in science class
@taledarkside Hey I did not say runs on water I said helps read before you open your eyes Oh I'm sorry you can't my bad I forgot you have your head up there pretty far huh??? LMFAO
I am a scientist, and I can't say for sure if 'overunity' systems can exist or not. Frankly, that matter exists at all is a case of 'overunity', if you ask me, and there may be some negative repercussions to drawing energy out of the unknown. Above and beyond the current suffering of the human condition ?
I guess that is why there are hydrogen filling stations in norway, denmark, sweden, germany and other countries..mostly because its inefficient, and doesn't work...lol
my dad saw a Popular Science book back in 40s a man near the end of world war 2 invented a pill ,put in water and it made the water burnable. the US Gover- brought there own 4 stroke motor and water and he brought the pill he put the pill in the water shoke it up put water in motor it started on 1st pull an ran. many hi brass was there to se this and an aid to a General. It was the aid that told this story to Pop Si- Mag i can't find this add,The pill has never been seen nore any mention of it
@crazyrebel2u that is urban legend, read abit about urban legend and youll understand what it is, water cannot burn without extratic hydrogen wich require electricity, you can oil in water wich can burn, but will be left with the water still, you cannot add and kind of pill to the water to have it burn, it is physicly impossible, this is scam at its best still today that pill scam was run in ontario by a guy name hewitt couple years ago and he went to jail after frauding 30 family with it
the water car and hho scam is still going strong these day and conspirationist love to bring that without even checking the science why it isnt possible and why it dont even make sence to use water as fuel, if people bother to get educated then they would surely understand why that would be stupid to extract hydrogen from water and then burn it!!!
@lapmarty Ha Ha, you idiot, you say for people to get educated, but you can't even spell! The trouble with being a moron, is that you are too stupid to know how stupid you are !
@RealiveProds im french critic me on my english grammar why do i care, if you beleive car can run on water then your the idiot, hydrogen is a storage energy not a source do you understand the difference moron?
@RealiveProds im not the one beleiving in a scam, (wich by the way still run in the world somewhere) a scam that you can even get the pattent shema on the internet,!! but off course you conspirationst professional bullshiter dont see that, and dont accept that he die from cerebral aneurism, your the one that is not smart enought to see he is stupid, hahaha laughble, by the way if you can speak to me in french then you may critize my english grammar
its a shame no one can find the prints or any real notes to making the car over all.I know a team of guys who would see the production through to make duplicate cars.We just need the info on the car and so on.I would devote the rest of my life to this project and to stick it to the government for their illegal crimes against Stan and the rest of us.
@rewire69 your a moron, this was a scam, you CANT extract hydrogen from water with less energy that it will produce, if you could then it would be a PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE, and having that in a car would be pretty stupid to begin with, in fact that would be the stupidiest use of a invention ever!!! but i dont think you understand what is the problem go get educated, hydrogen do work as a fuel,
@lapmarty well i never said it would work in the first place dip shit.I happen to be educated as well.
I happen to work in illegal securities fraud over all.Basically the stuff banks did to people to cause the market to crash.So I spend my days messing with banks and their screw ups.So anyhow I am sure it will work no doubt.I am saying nyone who creates something like this will come up missing because it will screw the big oil companies and our GOP want to protect their friends...Duh!!!
@rewire69 non sence propagate by conspiranist, fact the coal people then are the oil people now,
when electricity came along did edison been shoot?? invention of this magnitude cannot be keep secret,
even more those day with the internet, if something that big came along and work it would be duplicate, and would be all over the world the fact that it is just bad science and can never work, cause the principe behind it is stupid, and people beleiving in it might as well wich for a magic car,,
@rewire69 yeahyeahyeah conspiracy shit again, did all the electricity piaoneer been killed by the charcoal lord?? was edison, killed?? look buddy, you conspirationist nutjob have created a subculture were you are part of a imaginary resitance againts a non exitent bigbrother,with today internet, freedom of speech, new technology like this couldnt be suppress, you just need a couple hours so the news would be all over the place, and youve been wrong on einsten, on magnet, on pretty much evrething
@lapmarty Well I could take it or leave it.You have to be more then a few sandwiches short of a pic nic, to think that The government is you friend.I am actually not a conspiracy theory type.I do think some of the story is a little over the top like in a lot of other cases.I thought the block was dressed up and so on.But a lot of people create a lot of new things.But like I said im not going to fight over something that may or may not be real.I got better people to impress for lesser reasons,
@rewire69 yeah i agree unless the goverment want to supress a scam and the scam artist, by the way this scam is still going around, if people bother to look how scam artist use regional confinement to run scam for years, all around teh world, there is right now other entity of this scam in the us, in canada and germany, i dont beleive the goverment is my friend, see, you talk about it like it is a person, do you get that the goverment dont exist, it is a bunch of individual department and people
@lapmarty i dont know if its correct but i heard he had an aneurysm leaving a restraunt after being "mysteriously" poisned..im not stating that as fact..but i could believe it..hydrogen power could greatly reduce the amount of petro being used, and we need to reduce it in veihicles because we dont have an everlasting amount of it and its used in so many diff aspects of our lives from oil n grease for cars and factories to lip balm..petro is used in so much more than gasoline..
I did notice after watching the video some different things.But if they brother of the inventor lost it to someone in lets say the FBI guaranteed they switched shit around to avoid the motor from getting out to the public.Thats how the people you voted into office roll.
@lapmarty Have you heard of Einstein? E=MC2 Do you know what that means you moron? It is not a perpetual motion machine - it is extracting the energy that is already there!
YES IT IS a perpetual motion machine--which is impossible.
The only energy it is "extracting" is the energy YOU PUT THERE by breaking the H-O bond.
And the energy you "extract" CANNOT exceed the energy you're EXPENDING by breaking that H-O bond. And due to inefficiency, you must necessarily "extract" less energy than you expend in breaking the bond.
@UncleIrv2 dpmt try to explain this to this fool, his small mind cannot grasp the concept, he watch to many x-files, and conspiracy shit, and he beleive this shit is being suppress by a imaginary big brother
@RealiveProds we are talking about running car on water here, can you focus, on a singe topic, or like evryone else when you realise that you make no sense, retract and attack stuff on a more general problem,
the WATER CAR(THE SUBJECT HERE) cannot work, end of disussion,
@RealiveProds my good, your ignorant,e-mc2 is a formula that give you the potential of ATOMIC energy
what we are talking here isnt at all about atmoic fusion, its is extraction of a burning element out of water (hydrogen) e=mc2 dont even applied here since the energy we get out of hydrogen is from burning the gaz form,,,maybe before quoting Einstein, you should do a little research buddy,
@lapmarty I admit that it is most likely to be a scam, but the reason I mentioned E=MC2 is to remind you that any system containing matter already contains a vast amount of energy - so unless you examine all the energy in and energy out you cannot be completely confident that it is impossible. If it is at all possible, then some of the atomic energy may have been used to break the covalent bonds using resonance. But as I said, it does sound unlikely.
@RealiveProds there is a long vid on this, where stan had particle acellorators in his garage also... help answer some things? I am trying to find the video...
but water will never work, unless we extract the hydrogen BEFORE putting it in the car, but then it would be better to use the electricity requiere to do that and directly put it in a car, see, the second law of thermodynamic still intact
its a shame no one can find the prints or any real notes to making the car over all.I know a team of guys who would see the production through to make duplicate cars.We just need the info on the car and so on.
ok my bad you don't work for the Oil companies, you must work for the Electric companies. that is what i want to say. probly not, but your extreme anger over something so minute points to yes. my thoughts are not always so clear as others. but it would seem that with near unlimited amounts of water (The Oceans) and Energy (The Sun) we could easily make this work it doesnt have to be 100% efficient it just has to be cheaper.
it takes electricity to get the hydrogen from the water, lots of electricity you cant change that, the bound is a fix value, you cant improve or find a way to use less energy to break that bound that is physic,if you use electricity to transform water in hydrogen, it become your store energy, (hydrogen) with a lost, if you wanna be efficient you use directly the electricity in a motor, no point in converting it to hydrogen at all!!
@lapmarty You are wrong. Stan Meyers' invention was a way to extract the hydrogen and oxygen using much less electrical energy. I have studied the circuit diagrams and it seems pretty sound. I am an electronics engineer - shame many of the people posting on here are illiterate, uneducated morons.
@RealiveProds you cant you idiot,atomic bond of oxygen and hydrogen, will requiere the same amont of energy, it is a fix value do you GET THAT YOU IDIOT,?? this is the law of physic, get it???to say that is equivalent to say he invented a perpetual motion machine, but you dont understand that cause your intellect cannot grasp it, and let suppose he did, to put this machine in a car would be th most moronc use ever!!!!! we could bui giant on, produce free electricity, then run the car =EFFICIENCY
I see your point. but could the initial power source come from solar power cells?
whats the horse power of a HHO car versus a solar powered car? I also understand that for every time you change energy from one form to another you loose some. if it was only as easy as rigging up some altenators and electric motors with a little solar power in the mix. to bad that idea was just a big battery and a bad one at that :P
Because if it actually WASTES energy rather that PRODUCING energy, what is the point in converting the water???
L I S T E N :
It takes ENERGY (in the form of electricity) to convert the water into H and O. The problem is, it takes MORE energy than if you just RAN THE CAR ON THE ELECTRICITY!
So THERE IS NO POINT in converting the water. NOTHING IS GAINED!
The energy that's running the car IS NOT COMING FROM THE WATER. It's coming from the ELECTRICITY. And it's WASTING HALF OF IT!
@UncleIrv2 its not wasting energy. your taking water (a form of energy) and transfering it from water to electricity (another form of energy) to again be transfered to mechanical movement (again another form of energy.) Electricty is expensive, but water is cheap. get it now? i mean i dont know how much more clear i can make it.
@Minishisan my god your a idiot, you moron, water isnt a energy, it is the hydrogen in water you need to extract get it, it takes electricity get it, therefore, your converting electricity into hydrogen, wasting energy in the process, whats the point then,?? how much clearer do i have to be get it?
@Pv8man he did not, this scam is still run today, leahy does one version steeve ryan does one in new zeland with a bike, same old scam, same old same old, the problem is that you beeive in a fraud, The bond beetwen hydrogen and oxygen, will never change, it will always require the same amont of energy to break it,
and the amont of energy you get from hydrogen burning, will always also remain the same,
@lapmarty laws of physics are changed every day. Infact there is a whole field of science attributed to this. I'm sure you've never heard of it, you think the world is flat, the holocaust never happened, and Tesla got his funding pulled because Edson was a better inventor
@40joel actually i work in lab, and no the law of physic dont changed everyday, they actually never changes, there isnt a whole field about it, and no i beleive the holocost happend, i know about tesla, and the water car is a myth will always be a myth even if it was possible, running a car with this amazing invention would be pretty stupid, you dont seem to grasp the conpet do you? hydrogen is a storage of energy not a fuel, unless we would find hydrogen in nature already transform, think again
@lapmarty on a macro scale the laws of science have been bent, on a micro scale they have been completely broken. New theories have been adopted to explain these changes. Did you know that Tesla's power transmitters were designed to pull static electricity out of the atmosphere to be used? Other proven forms of free energy exist and have been proven also such as the magnet motor. What makes this so hard to believe?
@40joel what your refering to is the lack of a total theory uniting macro and micro, and people work on it the best avenue is the string theory, tesla idea isnt free energy so yes it is possible to have trick, harvesting static electricity, sunlight ect, it is really different from a water car, if you didnt understand why a water car is impossible wich is the object of this discussion then it is pointless to go on, a power car isnt a car but a perpetual motion machine, a hydrogen car is alerady
@lapmarty You're right, I was refering to the expiriments that led to a need for string theory because they broke the common laws of physics. The point being that common laws of physics can not be stated as an end all in terms of what is possible.
magnet motor is the same scam, if you understand why it is impossible ( a magnet is nothing more then a battery,, get it?? it store energy you have to put it there with electricity, it cost 20x the electricity it will store to magnetize them, check the physic of magnet and you will understand why it is a scam,
it is child play, and scam to get money from uneducated people sorry you dont seem to be aware of that
@lapmarty You know I have not looked into the energy required to make a magnet but some of the geo magnets last 20 years. It seemed plausible since the magnet has an electron flow before it s a magnet and when you charge it you are really just re-directing that electron flow to extract the energy that already exists in the object. I will look it up though- it's an interesting point
@lapmarty Mmm, one problem; a permanent magnet does not run out of energy. So how can there be any relevance to the amount of energy it took to magnetise it?
@RealiveProds magnet store energy in gauss, the physic of magnetism is well define, i dont knwo where you got the idea that permanent magnet dont demagnetize, probably because your so ignorant, they will loose there magnetism proportionally to the work load they have,
of course a neodynium toy magnet coould keep working for years, once in a motor, there is no escape to thermodynamic law, it loose power every time it crosses a other field, and produce a output, and need to be re-magnetize
@lapmarty Permanent magnets do not lose magnetism in the same way that gravity doesn't "run out". Old magnets were made from ineficient materials that did gradually fade after time, but neodymium magnets do not.
Répondre à cette vidéo... -mm, one problem; a permanent magnet does not run out of energy. just proove again how ignorant you are, we change your so called permanent magnet in machine all the time,
excuse me saying but your a idiot, that didnt even research any of that shit
@Pv8man even if he find a way to be more efficient let say 99% (impossible) you still lose 1% of energy, what is the point of teh converstion i still ask, why not run the car directly on the initial electricity, people are moron, how hard is this to understand,!!!
@UncleIrv2 Hydrogen and oxygen are both explosive and implosive afterwards, but Meyers had a way to mix the injected hho with non-combustible gasses ( air) in the combustion chamber in a way so that it explodes, but does not implode afterwards.
His patent revolves around his circuitry, which he was able to only put just enough energy into the cells to produce enough to run.
There are many unknowns about his invention because he is not alive today. But we are trying to find out.
@Pv8man what you say is something you saw in a website about meyer, and is totally pseudo-scientific,
first hydrogen isnt the issue at all, it is a issue on how you get the hydrogen,
and you cant get it from water without spending more energy (electrolisys) that you will get from burning it, whatever the mix you may do,
the bond of atoms beetween oxygen and hydrogen is a fix value, never change willl never change, to break that bound, you will always need more energy then you will get,
@lapmarty Yeah, Einstein thought the same thing about atomic energy, until he realised that you could break a plutonium atom with a neutron, and then cause a chain reaction. Don't assume anything is impossible!
@RealiveProds einstein hahah, this isnt the same think you moron, what is it that you dont get, breaking the bond of oxygen and hudrogen require a fix amount energy, it will never change get that ?? this is the law of nature,
then burning the hydrogen after you got it, you wil never get as much energy that it took to get the hydrogen get it?? its not fucking rocket science,
efficiency heard of it?? in that case you should use the electricity directly to run the motor, instead of convertion,
and by the way, einstein did realise that,,,,you just proove to be ignorant,
eintein gave a formula to get the potential, actually the people that realise that were oppenheimer, rutherford and the father of modern quantic physic,
@lapmarty Check your history, the Mannhattan Project was initiated by President Roosevelt following a letter from Einstein - but before that Einstein had thought it was impossible - but changed his mind.
if you find a way to break that bound and get more power from hydrogen that it cost you to get it you get yourself a perpetual motion machine, and lets face it putting that in a car would be the stupiest thing human wouldve ever done, we could get free electricty forever and therefore runs the car on battery charge by those machine and it would be way more efficient, why in the hell would we use that in a car!!you see how ignorant and stupid those scammer are when they talk about water car!
there are some diffrences on this one compared to the one from the news broadcast. i would be very carefull before buying it. and if some one has the plans they should share them with the rest of the world like he tried doing.
the right to enjoy all the privileges or special rights of citizenship, membership, etc., in a community or the like.
16.
the right to frequent, enjoy, or use at will: to have the freedom of a friend's library.
17.
Philosophy . the power to exercise choice and make decisions without constraint from within or without; autonomy; self-determination. Compare necessity ( def. 7 ) .
7.the absence of or release from ties, obligations, etc.
8.ease or facility of movement or action: to enjoy the freedom of living in the country.9.frankness of manner or speech.10.general exemption or immunity: freedom from taxation.11.the absence of ceremony or reserve.12.a liberty taken.13.a particular immunity or privilege enjoyed, as by a city or corporation: freedom to levy taxes.14.civil liberty, as opposed to subjection to an arbitrary or despotic government.
1.the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint: He won his freedom after a retrial.2.exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.3.the power to determine action without restraint.4.political or national independence.5.personal liberty, as opposed to bondage or slavery: a slave who bought his freedom.6.exemption from the presence of anything specified (usually fol. by from ): freedom from fear.
then try building a mini hho cell your self and when you see with your own eyes what they have been trying to suppress for so long ask your self if the ppl we let teach our children and the powers that govern us are really doing what they should be doing what is real freedom you ask (continued)
i placed a lighter to the tip of the bubbler and i got a "pop pop pop" i am not an engineer nore am i a scientist i have a high school education and i made a combustible gas from water this gos to show that the world we live in and see and experience day in and day out is obscured by influences that are to vast to comprehend by merely approval and dismissive mind setts. seeing is be leaving and if they can distort what you see , hear, think, learn, ( continued)....
i live in oshawa ontario canada and i can tell you all with out a shadow of dout that this tech.. works and is being used by everyday ppl even as i type this out. iv seen a hyundai tiburon out fitted with an hho cell and bubbler with my own eyes i have even made a mini hho cell/ bubbler out of a baby food jar 5-6 forks some copper wire hot glue clear rubber hoes from big als fish store and a nine volt batterie a dash of sodium bicarbonate and water
Stan Meyer was real and his Hydrogen car worked! They said he had a brain aneurysm, but that's a lie! You know the government lies sometimes right? 9/11, war in Iraq, fuel price rising, there all lies! These are the same shit bags that killed Stan Meyers! If his invention was a fraud he'd be alive today, it's when you really pose a threat to their industry they kill you! In 1807 an engine was built than ran on hydrogen.
Its not the amps that separate waters covalent bond its the volts! Rest in peace Stan! When peace comes to this world, im sure we will be running our vehicles on water. To hell with big oil!
No sir you be the idiot. Guy was so ahead of time. Why do you think he's dead. Oil company's that's why..And the Government. Would have put them all on a shelf to rot. You are not very Bright if you think different.Fact. Like it or not .
The LAWS OF PHYSICS prove that this "water car" is a fraud, and Stanley Meyer was a dirty con artist. And since you are helping to perpetuate this stupid fraud, you are nearly as bad.
@UncleIrv Oh and have you studied the laws of physics? if yes then you would know that nothing has to follow these "laws". if no then YOU are the ignoramus
I have a degree in Physics, you asshole. You are a lying piece of shit and you know it.
Your claims violate the law of conservation of energy, as well as common sense. You cannot find a physicist on the face of the earth that will back your claims.
First, nobody said a car cannot run on hydrogen. Of course it can! But that has nothing to do with this FRAUD.
The point is that water cannot be converted to H and O and then burned without a NET ENERGY LOSS. This is because it takes slightly MORE energy to electrolyze the water than you can get from the gas when you burn it. So the whole thing is STUPID, and you are a moron for believing it.
This is simple physics. But perhaps you are too dumb to learn it.
@UncleIrv IF you learn how he did convert H from water you would know it took less then one amp to do it. The amount of energy that came out was 5X the amount put in. Not only was there video of his invention but now we have many people having the same results when they replicate his design. Its pretty cool.
@SuperMrAtheist the bound beetwen oxygen and hydrogen is a fix value, the amount of energy to break it is never gonna change, you cannot find a more efficient way to break that bound, it is basic physic, it takes electricity and it takes more then it will ever produce, simple basic fact
Who cares if it takes more energy to produce the effect? your not creating a perpetual engine. theres a whole pacific ocean outside the Coos Bay / North Bend Area. alot more sea water than oil wouldnt you say? and i have seen footage of water HHO Torch and the byproduct is more water? so i doubt we would run out of water anytime soon. To those who say this is just a complex electric car, i say wake up! You do realize what they charge for electricity? alot more than for water I imagine.
Are you on drugs? Your comment is so illogical it's amazing!
T r y
R e a d i n g
S l o w l y . . .
What do you not understand about WASTING ENERGY? Converting the water DOES NOT PRODUCE ENERGY. It * W A S T E S * energy. The energy you get from burning the H is LESS THAN YOU HAD TO BEGIN WITH.
When you fill up your car with gas, do you spill half of it on the road to INCREASE your gas mileage? This makes as much sense as what you're saying.
@UncleIrv2, Okay....without me going into lots of research on his projuct. Let me just STOP you right here....IF his "discovery" was not the REAL DEAL.....then WHY the HELL did the US GOVERNMENT have engines placed in the TANKS and other equipment for trials??? Yea.....shut up now!!
@Minishisan are you stupid or what?? what would be the point in converting water to hydrogen with electricity?? why the fuck would we waste the elctricity? just put the fucking electricity in a battery and use it directly in a car is way more efficient
@UncleIrv By your logic, the atom bomb is also impossible. Go to a library, get a book on atomic physics, then come back and apologise! Fuck me, the world is going to shit since they stopped teaching real science in schools. I suppose you think the Earth is 6000 years old too eh?
The atom bomb doesn't violate the laws of physics, you stupid evil fuck.
So it's ridiculous to say that "by my logic" the atom bomb is impossible. "My logic" is the same logic that is shared by EVERY PHYSICIST ON EARTH, who would all collectively tell you you're full of shit.
Stanley Meyer's claims DO violate the laws of physics, and they DO NOT work. So they are the diametric opposite of the atom bomb.
YOU ARE EXPOSED AS A CON ARTIST--JUST LIKE MEYERS WAS
this buggy does not look like anything like the one in the news report, but he had 2 buggys and this one looks like the one he was using when he was working on the water fuel injectors
it is a fake this is not Stan Meyer's car.Take a look at the original news footage of his car and notice that his has a double roll bar on top and the lettering on his are a fancy style lettering and this one is just straight letter's and also the front bumper is different.Nothing but a con artist!do you think whoever killed him like the oil companies or government would compromise there income from oil by letting it be sold
I can honestly say that's not the real one, if so it is missing all of the equipment, the rear by the engines left side had a control box with all the circuit cards is not there along with many smaller details that would show up in this photo, great job on stirring curiosity though.
Any word on more information would be nice. If they are located near me, would love to go check the car out possibly take pictures. If this is indeed true.
Hope the person buying the car is truly interested in researching it further to release information. --S--
His scam pattent are available on the net, just build the idiocy so you see it aint working, in fact nobody even loose the time building it cause it is a scam, water cannot be use as a fuel,
hydrogen sure can, like the previous comment go learn some physic, and he wasnt killed, wel conspirationist like that shit but if he was killed to keep the process secret why are the plan available on the internet lol
lapmarty 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stanley Meyer used an injector in place of the spark plug. Fed by water and pulsed with high frerquency electric spark that cracked H=O=H into Brown's gas premix in part and the atomized water droplets would expand violently as steam upon ignition of the premix and then provide implosive power when the steam cooled. ??Correct??
StandardDeviation72 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
StandardDeviation72 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
StandardDeviation72 2 weeks ago
One of the hallmarks of idiocy is when people have the nerve to argue in areas where they have NO EXPERTISE.
All of you people who INSIST that this isn't a scam: If you're so dedicated to this cause, have the decency to GET A DEGREE IN PHYSICS so you can know what you're talking about. Then you will learn about COVALENT BONDS and how they work. Then you will clearly see how this is a scam.
The only type of physicist who would back this scam would be a liar who is in on the scam to make money.
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
@UncleIrv2 i would believe it to be real..im no chemist but ive toyed around with hho generators in my garage and have built one that produces over 1lpm wich does help fuel economy wihtout draining or killing my battery or alternator..so if im some dumb hick who can do this with half rate parts for under $100 with a hs diploma and next to no knowledge of science learning as i go,then why cant the govnt with billions of $ come up with something better? guess im just gullible..
twb74aol 2 weeks ago
@UncleIrv2 seems to me that u have wasted alot of time and effort geting degrees in order to make other people look stupid because you bitter about something..i dont need a degree to know that what i have built with my own two hands has a pos effect without having to buy more stuff(batteries alternators ect.) in order to compensate for the "lost energy used in producing...ur car alternator generally makes more than u need in wich is just wasted so why not make it more effecient?
twb74aol 2 weeks ago
@UncleIrv2 u wanna call everyone else morons damning this..but dont offer any of you super knowlegde of physics showing how to be more effecient..such a downer man!
twb74aol 2 weeks ago
Let's bring this down to a molecular level.
In water, the BOND between H and O atoms has a certain energy level. That energy level NEVER CHANGES.
You need to input THAT EXACT AMOUNT of energy (in the form of electricity) to break that molecular bond. When you reassemble the molecules into water (by burning the H) THAT EXACT SAME AMOUNT of energy is released. So you end up with NO NEW ENERGY.
Except that some energy is WASTED due to inefficiency. So you have a NET ENERGY LOSS.
IT'S A SCAM.
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
Clearly the WFC does not split or fuse atoms, but unless you thoroughly examine the state of the energy in vs. the energy out, then you cannot say it is impossible based purely on a dogmatic recital of the laws of physics.
RealiveProds 1 month ago
I can't say that the WFC definitely works or not, because I have not built one - which is the only way I could be sure. But for the so-called "science educated" people on here who are claiming it is a perpetual motion machine, which violates the laws of thermodynamics, there is something you are forgetting. There is a large quantity of energy available at an atomic level, so maybe the WFC was able to use a small amount of this energy...cont
RealiveProds 1 month ago
YOU ARE THE LOWEST FORM OF SHIT.
I OUTED YOU A SCAM ARTIST AND YOU BANNED ME FROM POSTING HERE...THEY YOU CONTINUE TO POST INSULTS TO ME WHEN I CANNOT ANSWER YOU!
YOU ARE LOWER THAN AN INSECT, YOU FUCKING COWARD.
EVERYBODY WHO UNDERSTANDS SCIENCE: IF YOU CRITICIZE THIS NUTCASE ASSHOLE HE WILL BAN YOU AND THEN MOCK YOU AFTER YOU CAN NO LONGER REPLY.
HE IS A COWARD WHO CANNOT TOLERATE CRITICISM. HE CANNOT DEBATE HIS CLAIMS ON AN EVEN PLAYING FIELD.
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
It has been proven and is every where on you-tube that you can make your own converter for less than $200.00 . I have seen several cars using it and it works so why is it so hard to belive one that runs completly on hydrogen come on wake up people. Pull your head out of your asses and relize your government works for big oil. You sheep!!!!
briondm4 1 month ago
@briondm4
Cars don't run on water, it runs off hydrogen, you stupid fuck. And you can convert water into hydrogen for 10 dollars. your just a stupid fuck that didn't pay attenton in science class
taledarkside 1 month ago
@taledarkside Hey I did not say runs on water I said helps read before you open your eyes Oh I'm sorry you can't my bad I forgot you have your head up there pretty far huh??? LMFAO
briondm4 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@briondm4
"So stupid I just can't belive it. Water already does help run a car."
there you saying it you stupid fucking sheep. those fucking kits will make a radio control car work, not a fucking real car. bunch of dumb sheeps.
taledarkside 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@briondm4
"So stupid I just can't belive it. Water already does help run a car."
there you saying it you stupid fucking sheep. those fucking kits will make a radio control car work, not a fucking real car. bunch of dumb sheeps.
taledarkside 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@briondm4
"So stupid I just can't belive it. Water already does help run a car."
there you saying it you stupid fucking sheep. those fucking kits will make a radio control car work, not a fucking real car. bunch of dumb sheeps.
taledarkside 1 month ago
So stupid I just can't belive it. Water already does help run a car.
briondm4 1 month ago
I am a scientist, and I can't say for sure if 'overunity' systems can exist or not. Frankly, that matter exists at all is a case of 'overunity', if you ask me, and there may be some negative repercussions to drawing energy out of the unknown. Above and beyond the current suffering of the human condition ?
DuncanDonuts3 1 month ago
I guess that is why there are hydrogen filling stations in norway, denmark, sweden, germany and other countries..mostly because its inefficient, and doesn't work...lol
markfrommaine 1 month ago
my dad saw a Popular Science book back in 40s a man near the end of world war 2 invented a pill ,put in water and it made the water burnable. the US Gover- brought there own 4 stroke motor and water and he brought the pill he put the pill in the water shoke it up put water in motor it started on 1st pull an ran. many hi brass was there to se this and an aid to a General. It was the aid that told this story to Pop Si- Mag i can't find this add,The pill has never been seen nore any mention of it
crazyrebel2u 2 months ago
@crazyrebel2u that is urban legend, read abit about urban legend and youll understand what it is, water cannot burn without extratic hydrogen wich require electricity, you can oil in water wich can burn, but will be left with the water still, you cannot add and kind of pill to the water to have it burn, it is physicly impossible, this is scam at its best still today that pill scam was run in ontario by a guy name hewitt couple years ago and he went to jail after frauding 30 family with it
lapmarty 2 months ago
the water car and hho scam is still going strong these day and conspirationist love to bring that without even checking the science why it isnt possible and why it dont even make sence to use water as fuel, if people bother to get educated then they would surely understand why that would be stupid to extract hydrogen from water and then burn it!!!
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty Ha Ha, you idiot, you say for people to get educated, but you can't even spell! The trouble with being a moron, is that you are too stupid to know how stupid you are !
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds im french critic me on my english grammar why do i care, if you beleive car can run on water then your the idiot, hydrogen is a storage energy not a source do you understand the difference moron?
lapmarty 1 month ago
@RealiveProds im not the one beleiving in a scam, (wich by the way still run in the world somewhere) a scam that you can even get the pattent shema on the internet,!! but off course you conspirationst professional bullshiter dont see that, and dont accept that he die from cerebral aneurism, your the one that is not smart enought to see he is stupid, hahaha laughble, by the way if you can speak to me in french then you may critize my english grammar
lapmarty 2 weeks ago
its a shame no one can find the prints or any real notes to making the car over all.I know a team of guys who would see the production through to make duplicate cars.We just need the info on the car and so on.I would devote the rest of my life to this project and to stick it to the government for their illegal crimes against Stan and the rest of us.
rewire69 2 months ago
@rewire69 your a moron, this was a scam, you CANT extract hydrogen from water with less energy that it will produce, if you could then it would be a PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE, and having that in a car would be pretty stupid to begin with, in fact that would be the stupidiest use of a invention ever!!! but i dont think you understand what is the problem go get educated, hydrogen do work as a fuel,
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty well i never said it would work in the first place dip shit.I happen to be educated as well.
I happen to work in illegal securities fraud over all.Basically the stuff banks did to people to cause the market to crash.So I spend my days messing with banks and their screw ups.So anyhow I am sure it will work no doubt.I am saying nyone who creates something like this will come up missing because it will screw the big oil companies and our GOP want to protect their friends...Duh!!!
rewire69 2 months ago
@rewire69 non sence propagate by conspiranist, fact the coal people then are the oil people now,
when electricity came along did edison been shoot?? invention of this magnitude cannot be keep secret,
even more those day with the internet, if something that big came along and work it would be duplicate, and would be all over the world the fact that it is just bad science and can never work, cause the principe behind it is stupid, and people beleiving in it might as well wich for a magic car,,
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty How old are you? Have you ever read a book in you life? I think not by your grammar and spelling.
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds im french you idiot, can you writte to me in english as good as i am writting to you in your native language?? so shut up
lapmarty 1 month ago
@rewire69 yeahyeahyeah conspiracy shit again, did all the electricity piaoneer been killed by the charcoal lord?? was edison, killed?? look buddy, you conspirationist nutjob have created a subculture were you are part of a imaginary resitance againts a non exitent bigbrother,with today internet, freedom of speech, new technology like this couldnt be suppress, you just need a couple hours so the news would be all over the place, and youve been wrong on einsten, on magnet, on pretty much evrething
lapmarty 1 month ago
@lapmarty Well I could take it or leave it.You have to be more then a few sandwiches short of a pic nic, to think that The government is you friend.I am actually not a conspiracy theory type.I do think some of the story is a little over the top like in a lot of other cases.I thought the block was dressed up and so on.But a lot of people create a lot of new things.But like I said im not going to fight over something that may or may not be real.I got better people to impress for lesser reasons,
rewire69 1 month ago
@rewire69 yeah i agree unless the goverment want to supress a scam and the scam artist, by the way this scam is still going around, if people bother to look how scam artist use regional confinement to run scam for years, all around teh world, there is right now other entity of this scam in the us, in canada and germany, i dont beleive the goverment is my friend, see, you talk about it like it is a person, do you get that the goverment dont exist, it is a bunch of individual department and people
lapmarty 1 month ago
Répondre à cette vidéo... stan meyer die of a medical problem, but like william cooper people try to make a martyr out of his death,
lapmarty 1 month ago
@lapmarty i dont know if its correct but i heard he had an aneurysm leaving a restraunt after being "mysteriously" poisned..im not stating that as fact..but i could believe it..hydrogen power could greatly reduce the amount of petro being used, and we need to reduce it in veihicles because we dont have an everlasting amount of it and its used in so many diff aspects of our lives from oil n grease for cars and factories to lip balm..petro is used in so much more than gasoline..
twb74aol 2 weeks ago
I did notice after watching the video some different things.But if they brother of the inventor lost it to someone in lets say the FBI guaranteed they switched shit around to avoid the motor from getting out to the public.Thats how the people you voted into office roll.
rewire69 2 months ago
@lapmarty Have you heard of Einstein? E=MC2 Do you know what that means you moron? It is not a perpetual motion machine - it is extracting the energy that is already there!
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds
YES IT IS a perpetual motion machine--which is impossible.
The only energy it is "extracting" is the energy YOU PUT THERE by breaking the H-O bond.
And the energy you "extract" CANNOT exceed the energy you're EXPENDING by breaking that H-O bond. And due to inefficiency, you must necessarily "extract" less energy than you expend in breaking the bond.
THIS EQUALS A NET ENERGY LOSS.
You are a liar and a fool.
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
@UncleIrv2 dpmt try to explain this to this fool, his small mind cannot grasp the concept, he watch to many x-files, and conspiracy shit, and he beleive this shit is being suppress by a imaginary big brother
lapmarty 1 month ago
@RealiveProds we are talking about running car on water here, can you focus, on a singe topic, or like evryone else when you realise that you make no sense, retract and attack stuff on a more general problem,
the WATER CAR(THE SUBJECT HERE) cannot work, end of disussion,
lapmarty 1 month ago
@RealiveProds my good, your ignorant,e-mc2 is a formula that give you the potential of ATOMIC energy
what we are talking here isnt at all about atmoic fusion, its is extraction of a burning element out of water (hydrogen) e=mc2 dont even applied here since the energy we get out of hydrogen is from burning the gaz form,,,maybe before quoting Einstein, you should do a little research buddy,
lapmarty 1 month ago
@lapmarty I admit that it is most likely to be a scam, but the reason I mentioned E=MC2 is to remind you that any system containing matter already contains a vast amount of energy - so unless you examine all the energy in and energy out you cannot be completely confident that it is impossible. If it is at all possible, then some of the atomic energy may have been used to break the covalent bonds using resonance. But as I said, it does sound unlikely.
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds there is a long vid on this, where stan had particle acellorators in his garage also... help answer some things? I am trying to find the video...
RobMonty248 3 weeks ago
but water will never work, unless we extract the hydrogen BEFORE putting it in the car, but then it would be better to use the electricity requiere to do that and directly put it in a car, see, the second law of thermodynamic still intact
lapmarty 2 months ago
@rewire69 the pattent office have the shema, wich you can see on the internet
dont you understand basic physic, water cant be use as fuel get it??? read the comment here they explain why
lapmarty 2 weeks ago
its a shame no one can find the prints or any real notes to making the car over all.I know a team of guys who would see the production through to make duplicate cars.We just need the info on the car and so on.
rewire69 2 months ago
Not even the same car people LOOK CLOSELY
hydrofuelincanada 3 months ago
am i the only one that noticed this is not even the same vehicle, LOOK CLOSELY, not even the same wheelbase ( length )
hydrofuelincanada 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all the parts are gone though
MrDonneiDarko 4 months ago
@dreamyear Does it work or not?
Galv140577 5 months ago
ok my bad you don't work for the Oil companies, you must work for the Electric companies. that is what i want to say. probly not, but your extreme anger over something so minute points to yes. my thoughts are not always so clear as others. but it would seem that with near unlimited amounts of water (The Oceans) and Energy (The Sun) we could easily make this work it doesnt have to be 100% efficient it just has to be cheaper.
Minishisan 5 months ago
@Minishisan still dont get it dont you?
it takes electricity to get the hydrogen from the water, lots of electricity you cant change that, the bound is a fix value, you cant improve or find a way to use less energy to break that bound that is physic,if you use electricity to transform water in hydrogen, it become your store energy, (hydrogen) with a lost, if you wanna be efficient you use directly the electricity in a motor, no point in converting it to hydrogen at all!!
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty You are wrong. Stan Meyers' invention was a way to extract the hydrogen and oxygen using much less electrical energy. I have studied the circuit diagrams and it seems pretty sound. I am an electronics engineer - shame many of the people posting on here are illiterate, uneducated morons.
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds you cant you idiot,atomic bond of oxygen and hydrogen, will requiere the same amont of energy, it is a fix value do you GET THAT YOU IDIOT,?? this is the law of physic, get it???to say that is equivalent to say he invented a perpetual motion machine, but you dont understand that cause your intellect cannot grasp it, and let suppose he did, to put this machine in a car would be th most moronc use ever!!!!! we could bui giant on, produce free electricity, then run the car =EFFICIENCY
lapmarty 1 month ago
I see your point. but could the initial power source come from solar power cells?
whats the horse power of a HHO car versus a solar powered car? I also understand that for every time you change energy from one form to another you loose some. if it was only as easy as rigging up some altenators and electric motors with a little solar power in the mix. to bad that idea was just a big battery and a bad one at that :P
Minishisan 5 months ago
Comment removed
Minishisan 5 months ago
@Minishisan
Because if it actually WASTES energy rather that PRODUCING energy, what is the point in converting the water???
L I S T E N :
It takes ENERGY (in the form of electricity) to convert the water into H and O. The problem is, it takes MORE energy than if you just RAN THE CAR ON THE ELECTRICITY!
So THERE IS NO POINT in converting the water. NOTHING IS GAINED!
The energy that's running the car IS NOT COMING FROM THE WATER. It's coming from the ELECTRICITY. And it's WASTING HALF OF IT!
UncleIrv2 5 months ago
@UncleIrv2 its not wasting energy. your taking water (a form of energy) and transfering it from water to electricity (another form of energy) to again be transfered to mechanical movement (again another form of energy.) Electricty is expensive, but water is cheap. get it now? i mean i dont know how much more clear i can make it.
Minishisan 5 months ago
@Minishisan my god your a idiot, you moron, water isnt a energy, it is the hydrogen in water you need to extract get it, it takes electricity get it, therefore, your converting electricity into hydrogen, wasting energy in the process, whats the point then,?? how much clearer do i have to be get it?
lapmarty 1 month ago
@UncleIrv2
Yes, you are right when you say that it takes more energy to rip water into hydrogen and oxygen.
(I've experimented with hho cells for 2 years)
But meyers found out a way to make it efficient enough to be feasible.
Problem 1. combustion engines are specifically designed to not run on hydrogen. (continued in my next comment) ----->>>
Pv8man 4 months ago
@Pv8man he did not, this scam is still run today, leahy does one version steeve ryan does one in new zeland with a bike, same old scam, same old same old, the problem is that you beeive in a fraud, The bond beetwen hydrogen and oxygen, will never change, it will always require the same amont of energy to break it,
and the amont of energy you get from hydrogen burning, will always also remain the same,
in case of a fuel cell, still no over unity,
it is what you dont seem to get,
lapmarty 3 months ago
there is no process that can change a law of physic, this will never change and therefore you cannot improve the process,
you can get free electricity from the sun let say run a plant that produce hydrogen from the ocean water,
that would be brillant, but then, you ask yourself, why in the fuck riun the car on hydrogen, just runs it directlly on the electricity,
there isnt such thing as free energy get over it
stan meyer was given the chance to proof his buggy works, never did so is ryan
lapmarty 3 months ago
@lapmarty laws of physics are changed every day. Infact there is a whole field of science attributed to this. I'm sure you've never heard of it, you think the world is flat, the holocaust never happened, and Tesla got his funding pulled because Edson was a better inventor
40joel 2 months ago
@40joel actually i work in lab, and no the law of physic dont changed everyday, they actually never changes, there isnt a whole field about it, and no i beleive the holocost happend, i know about tesla, and the water car is a myth will always be a myth even if it was possible, running a car with this amazing invention would be pretty stupid, you dont seem to grasp the conpet do you? hydrogen is a storage of energy not a fuel, unless we would find hydrogen in nature already transform, think again
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty on a macro scale the laws of science have been bent, on a micro scale they have been completely broken. New theories have been adopted to explain these changes. Did you know that Tesla's power transmitters were designed to pull static electricity out of the atmosphere to be used? Other proven forms of free energy exist and have been proven also such as the magnet motor. What makes this so hard to believe?
40joel 2 months ago
@40joel what your refering to is the lack of a total theory uniting macro and micro, and people work on it the best avenue is the string theory, tesla idea isnt free energy so yes it is possible to have trick, harvesting static electricity, sunlight ect, it is really different from a water car, if you didnt understand why a water car is impossible wich is the object of this discussion then it is pointless to go on, a power car isnt a car but a perpetual motion machine, a hydrogen car is alerady
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty You're right, I was refering to the expiriments that led to a need for string theory because they broke the common laws of physics. The point being that common laws of physics can not be stated as an end all in terms of what is possible.
40joel 2 months ago
magnet motor is the same scam, if you understand why it is impossible ( a magnet is nothing more then a battery,, get it?? it store energy you have to put it there with electricity, it cost 20x the electricity it will store to magnetize them, check the physic of magnet and you will understand why it is a scam,
it is child play, and scam to get money from uneducated people sorry you dont seem to be aware of that
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty You know I have not looked into the energy required to make a magnet but some of the geo magnets last 20 years. It seemed plausible since the magnet has an electron flow before it s a magnet and when you charge it you are really just re-directing that electron flow to extract the energy that already exists in the object. I will look it up though- it's an interesting point
40joel 2 months ago
@lapmarty Mmm, one problem; a permanent magnet does not run out of energy. So how can there be any relevance to the amount of energy it took to magnetise it?
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds magnet store energy in gauss, the physic of magnetism is well define, i dont knwo where you got the idea that permanent magnet dont demagnetize, probably because your so ignorant, they will loose there magnetism proportionally to the work load they have,
of course a neodynium toy magnet coould keep working for years, once in a motor, there is no escape to thermodynamic law, it loose power every time it crosses a other field, and produce a output, and need to be re-magnetize
lapmarty 1 month ago
@lapmarty Permanent magnets do not lose magnetism in the same way that gravity doesn't "run out". Old magnets were made from ineficient materials that did gradually fade after time, but neodymium magnets do not.
RealiveProds 1 month ago
Répondre à cette vidéo... -mm, one problem; a permanent magnet does not run out of energy. just proove again how ignorant you are, we change your so called permanent magnet in machine all the time,
excuse me saying but your a idiot, that didnt even research any of that shit
lapmarty 1 month ago
@40joel taking electricity from static in the air isnt free energy, as there is a source to tap in,
its not so hard to beleive, but logic tell you that this is a scam why cannot you see that,??
do you understand the basic incoherence in a water car do you?
lapmarty 1 month ago
i think you need to educate yourself a little more, im sorry you have no argument and apprently no scientific knowledge of any kind,
lapmarty 2 months ago
@Pv8man even if he find a way to be more efficient let say 99% (impossible) you still lose 1% of energy, what is the point of teh converstion i still ask, why not run the car directly on the initial electricity, people are moron, how hard is this to understand,!!!
lapmarty 1 month ago
@UncleIrv2 Hydrogen and oxygen are both explosive and implosive afterwards, but Meyers had a way to mix the injected hho with non-combustible gasses ( air) in the combustion chamber in a way so that it explodes, but does not implode afterwards.
His patent revolves around his circuitry, which he was able to only put just enough energy into the cells to produce enough to run.
There are many unknowns about his invention because he is not alive today. But we are trying to find out.
Pv8man 4 months ago
@Pv8man what you say is something you saw in a website about meyer, and is totally pseudo-scientific,
first hydrogen isnt the issue at all, it is a issue on how you get the hydrogen,
and you cant get it from water without spending more energy (electrolisys) that you will get from burning it, whatever the mix you may do,
the bond of atoms beetween oxygen and hydrogen is a fix value, never change willl never change, to break that bound, you will always need more energy then you will get,
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty Yeah, Einstein thought the same thing about atomic energy, until he realised that you could break a plutonium atom with a neutron, and then cause a chain reaction. Don't assume anything is impossible!
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds einstein hahah, this isnt the same think you moron, what is it that you dont get, breaking the bond of oxygen and hudrogen require a fix amount energy, it will never change get that ?? this is the law of nature,
then burning the hydrogen after you got it, you wil never get as much energy that it took to get the hydrogen get it?? its not fucking rocket science,
efficiency heard of it?? in that case you should use the electricity directly to run the motor, instead of convertion,
lapmarty 1 month ago
and by the way, einstein did realise that,,,,you just proove to be ignorant,
eintein gave a formula to get the potential, actually the people that realise that were oppenheimer, rutherford and the father of modern quantic physic,
your a idiot once againt
lapmarty 1 month ago
@lapmarty
Yeah, he will be banning you pretty soon. He's not only a baldfaced liar, but a coward as well.
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
@lapmarty Check your history, the Mannhattan Project was initiated by President Roosevelt following a letter from Einstein - but before that Einstein had thought it was impossible - but changed his mind.
RealiveProds 1 month ago
if you find a way to break that bound and get more power from hydrogen that it cost you to get it you get yourself a perpetual motion machine, and lets face it putting that in a car would be the stupiest thing human wouldve ever done, we could get free electricty forever and therefore runs the car on battery charge by those machine and it would be way more efficient, why in the hell would we use that in a car!!you see how ignorant and stupid those scammer are when they talk about water car!
lapmarty 2 months ago
@UncleIrv2 Moron - look at the facts again! Better still, read a book!
RealiveProds 1 month ago
What is the circle point out to?
Begbucks 5 months ago
The car is currently in the position of Steven Greer (New Age CIA Implant).
mwcdx 6 months ago
I made an HHO torch, it was cool watching the response of ppl who think you are makeing water burn. Alittle more too it than that lol.
WDTripps 6 months ago
there are some diffrences on this one compared to the one from the news broadcast. i would be very carefull before buying it. and if some one has the plans they should share them with the rest of the world like he tried doing.
AnthonyAndLaura07 9 months ago
question everything your tot and told .........please free your selves by thinking free :)
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
15.
the right to enjoy all the privileges or special rights of citizenship, membership, etc., in a community or the like.
16.
the right to frequent, enjoy, or use at will: to have the freedom of a friend's library.
17.
Philosophy . the power to exercise choice and make decisions without constraint from within or without; autonomy; self-determination. Compare necessity ( def. 7 ) .
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
7.the absence of or release from ties, obligations, etc.
8.ease or facility of movement or action: to enjoy the freedom of living in the country.9.frankness of manner or speech.10.general exemption or immunity: freedom from taxation.11.the absence of ceremony or reserve.12.a liberty taken.13.a particular immunity or privilege enjoyed, as by a city or corporation: freedom to levy taxes.14.civil liberty, as opposed to subjection to an arbitrary or despotic government.
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
–noun
1.the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint: He won his freedom after a retrial.2.exemption from external control, interference, regulation, etc.3.the power to determine action without restraint.4.political or national independence.5.personal liberty, as opposed to bondage or slavery: a slave who bought his freedom.6.exemption from the presence of anything specified (usually fol. by from ): freedom from fear.
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
then try building a mini hho cell your self and when you see with your own eyes what they have been trying to suppress for so long ask your self if the ppl we let teach our children and the powers that govern us are really doing what they should be doing what is real freedom you ask (continued)
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
i placed a lighter to the tip of the bubbler and i got a "pop pop pop" i am not an engineer nore am i a scientist i have a high school education and i made a combustible gas from water this gos to show that the world we live in and see and experience day in and day out is obscured by influences that are to vast to comprehend by merely approval and dismissive mind setts. seeing is be leaving and if they can distort what you see , hear, think, learn, ( continued)....
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
i live in oshawa ontario canada and i can tell you all with out a shadow of dout that this tech.. works and is being used by everyday ppl even as i type this out. iv seen a hyundai tiburon out fitted with an hho cell and bubbler with my own eyes i have even made a mini hho cell/ bubbler out of a baby food jar 5-6 forks some copper wire hot glue clear rubber hoes from big als fish store and a nine volt batterie a dash of sodium bicarbonate and water
jjooeemmaann 1 year ago
Is it sold !? who bought it !?
HonKyTanKMaN 1 year ago
The reason why they killed him wa to buy time
comebigarestayathome 1 year ago
Stan Meyer was real and his Hydrogen car worked! They said he had a brain aneurysm, but that's a lie! You know the government lies sometimes right? 9/11, war in Iraq, fuel price rising, there all lies! These are the same shit bags that killed Stan Meyers! If his invention was a fraud he'd be alive today, it's when you really pose a threat to their industry they kill you! In 1807 an engine was built than ran on hydrogen.
pidos847 1 year ago
Its not the amps that separate waters covalent bond its the volts! Rest in peace Stan! When peace comes to this world, im sure we will be running our vehicles on water. To hell with big oil!
EMPIRE0FLIES 1 year ago
if the car is in anyone's possession they stole it it belongs to stan meyers family .
Retro1963 1 year ago 8
they can't kill all of us there is enough people working with hho that they will have no chance of stopping all of us
psychonsober 1 year ago
THATS RIGHT THEY CANT STOP US ALL!!!!!!!!!!!
germomr2 1 year ago
I think Steven Greer owns the buggy now.
richcollins513 1 year ago
Comment removed
Bradtomshore 2 years ago 19
No sir you be the idiot. Guy was so ahead of time. Why do you think he's dead. Oil company's that's why..And the Government. Would have put them all on a shelf to rot. You are not very Bright if you think different.Fact. Like it or not .
24hosting 2 years ago 19
Comment removed
Bradtomshore 2 years ago
@Bradtomshore I got news for you. this year they flown an AIR BUS with hidrogen and did it OK
patofarma 1 year ago
@24hosting
Big oil killed him with an aneurysm?
bersaba 1 year ago
@24hosting
Shut your face, you fucking ignoramus.
The LAWS OF PHYSICS prove that this "water car" is a fraud, and Stanley Meyer was a dirty con artist. And since you are helping to perpetuate this stupid fraud, you are nearly as bad.
Go get abducted by a UFO, you fucking nut case.
UncleIrv 6 months ago
@UncleIrv you are one angry little shit. I can't go into detail but this car DOES work.
joefuss190 6 months ago
@UncleIrv Oh and have you studied the laws of physics? if yes then you would know that nothing has to follow these "laws". if no then YOU are the ignoramus
joefuss190 6 months ago
@joefuss190
How do you know his car works?
RisingPhoenix120 5 months ago
@UncleIrv Ha Ha The LAWS OF PHYSICS are something you are clearly not familiar with. When was the last time you actually read a book - moron!
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds
I have a degree in Physics, you asshole. You are a lying piece of shit and you know it.
Your claims violate the law of conservation of energy, as well as common sense. You cannot find a physicist on the face of the earth that will back your claims.
Stop misleading people with this bullshit.
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
@24hosting He is dead because someone he scammed killed him.
MrAwsome514 2 months ago
@Bradtomshore
YOU are the retard.
First, nobody said a car cannot run on hydrogen. Of course it can! But that has nothing to do with this FRAUD.
The point is that water cannot be converted to H and O and then burned without a NET ENERGY LOSS. This is because it takes slightly MORE energy to electrolyze the water than you can get from the gas when you burn it. So the whole thing is STUPID, and you are a moron for believing it.
This is simple physics. But perhaps you are too dumb to learn it.
UncleIrv 6 months ago
@UncleIrv IF you learn how he did convert H from water you would know it took less then one amp to do it. The amount of energy that came out was 5X the amount put in. Not only was there video of his invention but now we have many people having the same results when they replicate his design. Its pretty cool.
SuperMrAtheist 5 months ago
@SuperMrAtheist the bound beetwen oxygen and hydrogen is a fix value, the amount of energy to break it is never gonna change, you cannot find a more efficient way to break that bound, it is basic physic, it takes electricity and it takes more then it will ever produce, simple basic fact
lapmarty 2 months ago
@lapmarty No such thing as a simple fact, unless you are a simple person!
RealiveProds 1 month ago
Comment removed
Minishisan 5 months ago
Who cares if it takes more energy to produce the effect? your not creating a perpetual engine. theres a whole pacific ocean outside the Coos Bay / North Bend Area. alot more sea water than oil wouldnt you say? and i have seen footage of water HHO Torch and the byproduct is more water? so i doubt we would run out of water anytime soon. To those who say this is just a complex electric car, i say wake up! You do realize what they charge for electricity? alot more than for water I imagine.
Minishisan 5 months ago
@Minishisan
Are you on drugs? Your comment is so illogical it's amazing!
T r y
R e a d i n g
S l o w l y . . .
What do you not understand about WASTING ENERGY? Converting the water DOES NOT PRODUCE ENERGY. It * W A S T E S * energy. The energy you get from burning the H is LESS THAN YOU HAD TO BEGIN WITH.
When you fill up your car with gas, do you spill half of it on the road to INCREASE your gas mileage? This makes as much sense as what you're saying.
Do you get it yet? Are you listening?
UncleIrv2 5 months ago
@UncleIrv2, Okay....without me going into lots of research on his projuct. Let me just STOP you right here....IF his "discovery" was not the REAL DEAL.....then WHY the HELL did the US GOVERNMENT have engines placed in the TANKS and other equipment for trials??? Yea.....shut up now!!
XRayCam 3 months ago
@UncleIrv2 Oh dear, do you think stating something more vehemently hides the fact that you are an idiot?
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds
Does BANNING PEOPLE who expose you as a con artist hide the fact that you are a con artist and a coward?
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
@Minishisan are you stupid or what?? what would be the point in converting water to hydrogen with electricity?? why the fuck would we waste the elctricity? just put the fucking electricity in a battery and use it directly in a car is way more efficient
lapmarty 2 months ago
@UncleIrv By your logic, the atom bomb is also impossible. Go to a library, get a book on atomic physics, then come back and apologise! Fuck me, the world is going to shit since they stopped teaching real science in schools. I suppose you think the Earth is 6000 years old too eh?
RealiveProds 1 month ago
@RealiveProds
The atom bomb doesn't violate the laws of physics, you stupid evil fuck.
So it's ridiculous to say that "by my logic" the atom bomb is impossible. "My logic" is the same logic that is shared by EVERY PHYSICIST ON EARTH, who would all collectively tell you you're full of shit.
Stanley Meyer's claims DO violate the laws of physics, and they DO NOT work. So they are the diametric opposite of the atom bomb.
YOU ARE EXPOSED AS A CON ARTIST--JUST LIKE MEYERS WAS
UncleIrv2 1 month ago
Can you tell me all of the patent numbers on the plate at the end of the video?
Watchdog1010 2 years ago
@Watchdog1010
5,149,407 4,826,581 5,293,857 4,936,961, 4,798,661 4,389,981 4,613,304
RetroGamerr1991 1 year ago
this buggy does not look like anything like the one in the news report, but he had 2 buggys and this one looks like the one he was using when he was working on the water fuel injectors
aynard 2 years ago
Wolf is right. I just looked for the original video and the buggy is different. Can we beat the ass of the scam artist posting this?????
milliman77 2 years ago
Tell you what! If it is the real deal and I can test drive it you got a sale! If it's a scam I'll beat your ass like no tomorrow!
Bet I don't get to test drive it!
milliman77 2 years ago
Its true!! I found it too! Its in my files on my computer as well!
Thanks dreamyear.
state8citizen 2 years ago
thats not a recent Ohio liscense plate, its from a few years ago... which tells me its not even a recent picture...
Lippsou812 2 years ago
Who is Stanley Mayer? I thought Stanley Meyer invented the VIC and WFC!!
bartley440 3 years ago
it is a fake this is not Stan Meyer's car.Take a look at the original news footage of his car and notice that his has a double roll bar on top and the lettering on his are a fancy style lettering and this one is just straight letter's and also the front bumper is different.Nothing but a con artist!do you think whoever killed him like the oil companies or government would compromise there income from oil by letting it be sold
wolf18456823 3 years ago
If the technology was left on the buggy then it would be much more then 70k as a starting price!
beginerhydro 3 years ago
I can honestly say that's not the real one, if so it is missing all of the equipment, the rear by the engines left side had a control box with all the circuit cards is not there along with many smaller details that would show up in this photo, great job on stirring curiosity though.
gerriburn 3 years ago
WHERE? - The photo seems old. Where is it?...
ehnriko 3 years ago
It`s a big scam. Don`t spend your money on this BS.
alvastornado 3 years ago
COOL..When dose the BACK ENGINEERING start ?
So we can finaly move forward in saving OUR PLANET.
cmorethings 3 years ago
Any word on more information would be nice. If they are located near me, would love to go check the car out possibly take pictures. If this is indeed true.
Hope the person buying the car is truly interested in researching it further to release information. --S--
sirHOAX 3 years ago
your link is not working ?
honda4004 3 years ago
how about a little more info? and some sound would be nice
RichardNStone 3 years ago
so, who bought it?
youarelackluster 3 years ago
it's not sold yet...so far the bid 70k now.
dreamyear 3 years ago
I dug up the real Stan Meyer, How much will you give me and you can sell them as a complete set !
ChrisPCrunchy 2 years ago
@dreamyear why would you sell this? why wouldnt you take it to someone who could get it publicized, and get the technology out there?
LordMoxas 9 months ago