@paygirl150 Because he didn't retire like those two did. He's quite a bit younger, so there hadn't been a chance yet. The two you mentioned were part of the original minutemen in the '40s, being relatively young then. The movie is set in '84-85~. A more obvious observation is that there was no Rorschach in the original Minutemen, requiring no Rorschach II for the movie.
Something rewarding in his eyes... The look of someone who's just simultaneously voided both bladder and bowels.
Cool as this scene was, I see why it was left-out. It was redundant with the psychiatrist scene where Rorschach explained that Walter died with the little girl.
Is notable in that it clearly stated Rorschach was homeless, rather than having a slum room with the landlady who would claim to have had an affair with him like in the book. But he was called a "hobo" in another scene too.
@rajvader if your referring to the scene when he walked past the hooker, she called him a homo, not a hobo. Personally i don't think it makes where Walter Kovaks lived, but how Rorschach worked
I had to get the director's cut because they took out of the small good parts from the comics. Scenes like this bring it closer to being just like the book
They edited this movie completely wrong. You take out the long sex scenes, excessive violence, and unnecessarily long ending, and you replace them with scenes like this that are so simple, and yet help you understand everything about this world better.
I wonder what he meant by his "spotless gloves"? He couldn't mean they're actually immaculately clean, as he keeps them in the frigging garbage and everyone remarks on how bad he smells.
Maybe it's allusion to his hands being clean, metaphorically or something?
I'd say it's an ironic statement referring to the fact he's killed people with his hands and the gloves aren't a part of his body so they haven't been actively performing murders, when he equips his gloves they are like a fresh start.
It is entirely understandable why these scenes were cut. Not to say they aren't great, but one of the biggest challenges in a 2+ hour movie is the pacing. It's not the length of the scene that is the problem, but the focus.
The highest grossing movie adjusted for inflation is Gone With the Wind. The highest grossing movie not adjusted for inflation is Titanic. Both are over three hours long.
The focus of Watchmen isn't on the story, it's on the characters and the world. Cutting a scene for pacing doesn't make sense with this movie.
Eh, I disagree. Watchmen has so many characters and branching plot lines, they needed to make sure that the viewers weren't too caught up in irrelevant scenes. This scene does help develop Rorschach's character, but isn't vital to the story. I would have preferred for this scene to be in the movie, but I can understand why the editors feared too many scenes like this could distract the audience.
Comment removed
HarryplusHermione 5 months ago
at what part in the standard movie should this have been? I cant remember, must have been before the prison breakout?
trentdarko 5 months ago
@trentdarko Just before he gets arrested at Moloch's house.
mortman200 5 months ago
its funny how rorschach doesnt care about women but hates rape and wont let it happen...
there was a silk spectra II, night owl II but not rorschach II why? because he is irreplaceable!
paygirl150 5 months ago 7
@paygirl150 Because he didn't retire like those two did. He's quite a bit younger, so there hadn't been a chance yet. The two you mentioned were part of the original minutemen in the '40s, being relatively young then. The movie is set in '84-85~. A more obvious observation is that there was no Rorschach in the original Minutemen, requiring no Rorschach II for the movie.
requiem4adream33 2 weeks ago
I wish cops were like this
SuperMicklovin 6 months ago 11
I am so confused, I just watched the movie twice in a row online, and this scene was in it.....?
AlbinoTopaz 8 months ago
@AlbinoTopaz Its a cut scene :P
pricture 7 months ago
@AlbinoTopaz No, it's not. LIke AlbinoTopaz said, it's a cut scene.
RasiumLane 7 months ago
yeah this 53 seconds of awesome footage of the one interesting character of the movie with the best actor is too much, cut it
GamerEly 8 months ago 5
Rapist don't like this scene.
Florek777 8 months ago 3
I wonder how the hell Rorschach was able to disarm that guy despite having the gun pointing straight at him while he's standing like ten feet away.
martiallaw09 9 months ago
@martiallaw09 Because he's a superhero, yo.
chapacoka 7 months ago
funny thing is they gave the directors cut version on HBO but this scene and some other's weren't there
mrgrimm49 9 months ago
1 person looked up a yelled "save us" and Rorschach whispered "No."
ReverseNegativeTV 11 months ago 8
So good...
MrRottenPotato 11 months ago
They cut out this but left in like 4 long ass sex scenes?
Nerevar1990 11 months ago 8
@Nerevar1990 maybe they wanted to give a reason to buy the dvd
WREQUIEM 10 months ago
rorschach should write a book.
Gerald360halowowness 1 year ago 11
Something rewarding in his eyes... The look of someone who's just simultaneously voided both bladder and bowels.
Cool as this scene was, I see why it was left-out. It was redundant with the psychiatrist scene where Rorschach explained that Walter died with the little girl.
Is notable in that it clearly stated Rorschach was homeless, rather than having a slum room with the landlady who would claim to have had an affair with him like in the book. But he was called a "hobo" in another scene too.
rajvader 1 year ago
@rajvader if your referring to the scene when he walked past the hooker, she called him a homo, not a hobo. Personally i don't think it makes where Walter Kovaks lived, but how Rorschach worked
MrSeanMorello 1 year ago
I love it how Rorchach is like this vampire. Only except of having cravings for blood, he has cravings for disembowling criminals
Killzoneguy117 1 year ago
when does this happen, I am sure this would have made the cut if there was a good place to put it but there isnt any from what I recall.
DarkRambo134 1 year ago
Put on your cool face........Problem rapist?
EchoBoomer1987 1 year ago 5
they leave the crap sex scenes in but cut this stuff?
Banminator 1 year ago
I had to get the director's cut because they took out of the small good parts from the comics. Scenes like this bring it closer to being just like the book
GameLantern337 1 year ago
Only Rorschach can intimidate someone just by clearing his throat.
geckoguy555 1 year ago 7
...Sometimes the night is generous to me.
neoyouaretheone117 1 year ago
Rorschach's my favorite character!
Megadellter 1 year ago
They edited this movie completely wrong. You take out the long sex scenes, excessive violence, and unnecessarily long ending, and you replace them with scenes like this that are so simple, and yet help you understand everything about this world better.
Nanaman12345 1 year ago 7
Sometimes the night is generous to me..
JayDee98765 1 year ago
Comment removed
JayDee98765 1 year ago
ohgodithinkijustcame
PayNoAttentiontoCaes 1 year ago 5
My face..
xLionBoSS 1 year ago 6
I always think of rorschach as a badass private detective instead of a super hero, funny isnt?
RedGun15 1 year ago 5
why have they cut out half of the comic book! the film was a mess without it
pottyaboutpotter1 1 year ago
@pottyaboutpotter1 It should of been a f hour film or a three part movie.
thingjob 1 year ago
funny how in the book, his gloves were decidedly NOT clean.
entropyapathy 1 year ago
Only Rorschach can be intimidating just by clearing his throat
Ninety9Soulz 1 year ago 27
yeh like when nite owl beats down that knot top
mattieonutube273 1 year ago
Where's the rest of it? Is this the end or do they show Rorschach kick the rapist's arse?
mkdhaval 1 year ago
Why does he mention his gloves but not his hat?
TKA001 1 year ago
I love how all he does is clear his throat and both the attacker and victim freeze. He is one scary puppy.
tiemedown 1 year ago
Spotless gloves? I like!
pricture 2 years ago 11
In the novel, you can see that his clothes are actually
in pretty bad shape. both costumes.
Shows he is slightly out of touch with reality.
Losing his mind inside of the Rorschach identity.
zeptimp 2 years ago 3
@zeptimp OR it simply shows that hes poor and isnt too concerned with the condition of his clothes...lol.
enaler1001 1 year ago
This should have been in the movie it tells so much about Rorschach!
helzballa 2 years ago 21
the probably cut it to save an extra minute
nomorerocketships 2 years ago
i agree
DeutschAutos 2 years ago
what happend next!
TheHunterL4D 2 years ago
thts all tht happens in the novel.
lankinator24 2 years ago
I need a pair of spotless gloves
GoldenColts 2 years ago 9
whats the name of the music in the background?
AFYONMeMo 2 years ago
all gloves acheive that
kuth15 2 years ago
Maybe spotless as in they leave no fingerprints
KaguyaShenku0 2 years ago 4
No blood. Because it was before he killed maybe.
Filmzie 2 years ago
I wonder what he meant by his "spotless gloves"? He couldn't mean they're actually immaculately clean, as he keeps them in the frigging garbage and everyone remarks on how bad he smells.
Maybe it's allusion to his hands being clean, metaphorically or something?
CatAtomic99 2 years ago 7
or maybe he cleans em just keeps them in can in rest of clothes. i think its the bit of clothes his 2nd most proud of
Pconrad777 2 years ago
I'd say it's an ironic statement referring to the fact he's killed people with his hands and the gloves aren't a part of his body so they haven't been actively performing murders, when he equips his gloves they are like a fresh start.
lordmikk 2 years ago
yes, it means he do the right thing, he's free from dirt of crime
dragoon003 2 years ago
The night is very generous indeed :)
ChristiansCartoons 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i didn't notice he was a hobo when he's not rorschach(the one with "the end is night")
635574 2 years ago
its not "the end is night", its the end is NIGH, it means near
c0nman101 2 years ago 8
It is entirely understandable why these scenes were cut. Not to say they aren't great, but one of the biggest challenges in a 2+ hour movie is the pacing. It's not the length of the scene that is the problem, but the focus.
Propolandante 2 years ago
The highest grossing movie adjusted for inflation is Gone With the Wind. The highest grossing movie not adjusted for inflation is Titanic. Both are over three hours long.
The focus of Watchmen isn't on the story, it's on the characters and the world. Cutting a scene for pacing doesn't make sense with this movie.
62SG 2 years ago 7
Eh, I disagree. Watchmen has so many characters and branching plot lines, they needed to make sure that the viewers weren't too caught up in irrelevant scenes. This scene does help develop Rorschach's character, but isn't vital to the story. I would have preferred for this scene to be in the movie, but I can understand why the editors feared too many scenes like this could distract the audience.
Propolandante 2 years ago
Love it
Thanks for posting ;)
JosephMelia 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WTF he speaks like an endorser for a new fashion line for men
paolotherapper 2 years ago
That's why the police said "He stinks!"
I understand now.
standalone9 2 years ago 3
OMG so many cut scenes which should have made the original. WTF were they thinking?
Oh wait, I live outside of the USA.....so I don`t count. Silly me.
envox 2 years ago 3
This scene should have stayed in the movie.
Marden13 2 years ago 9
great scene
vivatdk65 2 years ago 3
how could they not include that in the theatrical version?????!!!!!!! that and two other scenes?
halofable574 2 years ago 2
length of film.
bbiguy 2 years ago
i guess you are right, the yshould have cut out or reduced a sex scene and made room for this
halofable574 2 years ago 115
but hey thats america for you. if it doesnt have tits then people usually gtfo lmfao
Ubertastic 2 years ago 11
Lmao that's fucked up considering that I'm American.
Paperagent02 2 years ago 2
no way :p
olivierken69 2 years ago
@halofable574 Yeah a little less pity fuck
MsKHtheAddict 9 months ago
@halofable574 Right!
RasiumLane 7 months ago
@halofable574 or just remove all the slow motion.
Sarahisaninja13 5 months ago
THAT IS EPIC!!!!!
halofable574 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
he sounds like Christian Bale : /
rianRCwolf 2 years ago