Added: 3 years ago
From: Jacobs511
Views: 72,976
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (284)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Американцы идут "вперёд в прошлое", от пятого поколения к четвёртому, видать поняли что раптор *овно. Но и F-35 что странное, почти наш СУ34.... только и не истребитель и не бомбер =). Просто что-то неопределённое, но зато малозаметное, что впрочем тоже под вопросом, как известно малозаметный раптор ни разу не воевал реально, а знаменитые "стелсы" таки сбивались древними советскими ракетами (по признанию самих амер. 1, по другим данным до 20).

  • у Ф-35 маневренности как у тапка, и грузоподъемность никакая, скорости никакой, уход нужен постоянный, самолет ниочем.

  • The F35 hasnt done anything yet so how can you say it works??? on a test done by the Ausies the F35 F18 F22 were said to be bad in air to air combat the pilots who fought against them sasid that it was like clubing baby seals so look it up before you start comparing planes 0_o

  • @Cantankerous65 Have you tried clubbing baby seals? It might be a wee bit tougher than you anticipate.

  • @vk45de What???? 0_o

  • @Cantankerous65 the aussies had a cheap knock off version of it... and its not designed to be an old school dog fight ship, its designed to be a stealth sniper... aussies dont get to have that tech. lol so no wonder they sucked.

  • @eddieisfiction For the record if you really care about America do what I do white to congress and tell them to stop spending our money like there is no tomorrow on things that don't work do what you think is best but the reality is what it is and NO the Austrelians didnt have a cheap F35 it was the real deal with lockeed there to watch it all the F35 is a pcs of #$% just like the F22

  • а смысл в чем ваши самолёты говно я и так знаю.в чём агрессия

  • @7777777fresh Russian planes have always been inferior to U.S. planes. I could drown you in examples.

  • i WISH I knew wtf u guys were talking about

  • @GENERAL1002 they are talking about that our 4th generation jets can do the things, which your 5th generation jets can't do. basically what they are saying is! " wate till our 5th gen jets comes out" :) capish ?

  • наши самолеты 4-ого поколения могут то, что их и 5-ого поколения не смогут

  • почему же тогда ваши хваленые самолёты при конденсации влаги на плате компъютера даже взлететь не смогли????? И это боевая техника??? Где же надежность которая так нужна во время боя???? Во время боя надо что бы все стреляло и работало, а не кофе пить!!!!! И думать как же воевать то без компьютеров

  • russian plain best

    but nobody wants war(russian people or americans )

    war in the head of politicians

  • су-37 не в конкуренции.

  • су-37 не в конкуренции.

  • music placed change (f-35 on su-37)

  • Usa pretty planes

    Russia bad ass planes

  • The winner is NOONE since the F35 is too buisy with hovering around and the su37 is too busy with stunting around and doing weird moves which make the pilot desorientated

  • and ELECTRONIC WARFARE is a bitch. US jets switch off any samsites or enemy aircraft targeting systems that get close.

  • The best models su : SU 33 ,SU 34, SU 35, SU 37 , SU 47

    Good quality and advanced technology.

    The result: lower cost of overhaul

  • @david87758 And SU-27!!! SU 27 - LEGENDA!!!

  • Why all the hate on American planes? Every fighter jet video I go onto, they hate on American planes..... F-35 is said to be the most advance jet in the world. And the F-22 Raptor was the best jet in the world for quite some time..... too bad it's discontinued now but what's up with all of you Russians hating on our jets? Jealous much?

  • @TheHm3 Not russian here , infact i WISH the F35 was all its hyped up to be but unfortunatly , so far, it's not. Its slower, less manuverable and has a shorter range than its competition. All it has going for it is "stealth"

  • @Antifaith29 Foolish American Army. They let Lockheed and Martin design the jet rather than Boeing. Why did they deny Boeing? Or why didn't they develop a jet with the Japanese like the Mitsibushi F-2? But the F-35 is not released yet, the F-16 is still used. F-35 is used currently for training Navy and only 13 test aircrafts have been built so far. So lets see how this turns out after 2016 or 2018 where this will be introduced.

  • @TheHm3 Lets hope they iron out the problems. My countrys military budget is a mere fraction of the USA's and weve ordered off the first block of f 35's. Id hate to think were defenceless for the next 30 years.

  • @Antifaith29 Ah, Australia did order some F-35s. I see Australia had bashed the F-35. If what they're saying is true, Lockheed&Martin are likely to take a look at it and fix out the problems. And Russians, they have good jets but they'll probably not be able to kill the F-35 in real life. But remember Lockheed&Martin are responsible for what is probably the best jet in history, the F-16. Don't worry, they'll hammer out all the problems. I'm sure they realize they've screwed up :)

  • @TheHm3 the reason it got discontinued is because it was TOO powerful. its like having a nuclear missile that does all the damage but afterwords comes back to base to refuel and go out again.

  • @TheHm3 Hell Yeah they are fucking jealous, We created a hypersonic plane that does 13,000 mph, and the best thing is its a drone, Can carry nukes even though we have icbms, it can carry any bomb and its made to hit with out anybody knowing, it can get to california to new york in under 12 minutes, All these fucking countries that are hating on us better watch the fuck out, We came to this world winning and we are going to leave winning.

  • @TheZombieSlay3rs You're talking about the Falcon, the Falcon was to be a regular commercial airplane and it crashed half way to Cali. But we do have other planes like the X-43 which tops 7,000 mph and x-47b that is likely to do even better and the X-47B is a UCAV made for combat and we also have a concept of 6th generation already, called the F/A XX!

  • @TheHm3 no usa tested the htv-2 that went 13,000 miles can hour and the usa has the x-51 witch goes 7,000 mph and the sabore is also a 6th gen concept

  • @TheHm3 The Falcon is a drone, It in a rocket and when it reaches massive height the rocket lets out the drone and can go to top speeds of 13,000 miles an hour on 2000 less then the minute man icbm, And yeah the X-43 and X-47B's are pretty sick, i laugh my ass off when this people from other countries say they are better or have better tech. It's freaking hysterical because they don't do enough research to even know what iis right,

  • Chinese, Pakistani, African, Russian, Indian, European or American Jets. It has nothing to do with speed or how nice it manuver, what counts now a days is what sort of technology they have and what rockets they carry.

    I mean come on, everyone knows how to make a jet engin that can fly fast and manuver,

    I say so far F22 got the best radar and wepon.

  • oh...and by the way...doesnt the su-pilot looks like he's gonna take a cigarette at any moment?? It s funny how relaxed he's flying so much g-forces..

  • Sadly, as in all vids about this, all remarks come down to a thing in history called Cold War. I have news for you...it is over! There is no cold war, america doesnt have to be the best in everything, win wars (something you could never do as long as you behave like a bully, btw) or doesnt have to make the best fighters or whatever. If you wanna be smart start google,wiki or whatever...you do the math.

    ENJOY the beauty of all fighters! And yes the su37 is TO ME the most sexy fighter ever!

  • su37 looks better

  • Not gonna lie, at 1:35, it looks like there's a giant tapeworm coming out of its ass.

  • the F35 has one of the ugliest airframes out there.

  • Su-47 would kick the F-35's ass easy, dam thing can turn on a dime i've seen one with my own eyes and man the F-35's got no chance.

  • The F22 wound up beeing a high dollar lemon that can barely acheive a 60% flyable rate with matinence crews working 24/7 requireing 30hrs for every hr in the air... The preformance figures on the F35 are rather dismal in compairson to present Russian fighters.....Yawn......

  • F35 is dinner for Su37

  • the f35 could take down that russian piece of trash YoYo27 or whatever the F its called in a heartbeat...UK, AUS, USA BABY! woo.

  • @teltelamont Nope :) Su turns on a sixpence, would have a missile up ya bunghole just on one fly by. Dont talk trash. F35 suffers with severe software problems.

  • @SubZero1703 actually, no. with a combat payload the SU-37 is just another mediocre russian fighter. it is still no match for the combat proven F-15,16,or18, and i am almost 100% positive it would loose to the F-22, and just look at the EODAS system on the F-35. with EODAS in place F-35>SU37 99 out of 100 times.

  • @hotpocketpoison Oh dear god. No need to stain the facts and statistics with over patriotism mate. F-35 suffers horrendous computer failures and is grounded more times than its airborn. Russian aircraft have superior stealthing technology aswell F-15,16 or 18 has not. Americans are still trying to work out the plasma screening that most Russian standard fighters have now.

  • @SubZero1703 plasma stealth technolegy is just another idea, NO russian fighter has plasma(or stealth)technolegy, and the PAKFA has VERY little RAM and RAP how do you think they kept it so cheap? you havnt got a shit clue what you are talking about, just stop now before you make a complete ass of yourself.

  • @hotpocketpoison I lol at you sir, you talk out of your arse. Keep on truckin patriot bot!

  • @SubZero1703 where have you ever seen a russian plane with plasma technology???if you answer with anything but"i havnt"then you are a lying scumbag.the SU-37 is just another crappy russian airshow queen,but not intended for real combat.it has been stripped down of ANYTHING that could add ANY weight,if you put a combat load on this aircraft it would just be another mediocre russian fighter, and again,if you deny this than you are a lying scumbag who has NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT!!!

  • @hotpocketpoison Вы подводите американца :) If you are a very well educated American you can speak more than one language. I speak yours can you speak ours ? Same goes for planes we can do all you can do and more. Keep on dreaming.

  • @SubZero1703 what"more"can your planes do? i havent seen one thing that a russian plane can do that an american plane cant do 10x better.and no i cant speak your fucking language...why?...BECAUSE I WONT EVER GO TO YOUR DAMN COUNTRY! there are probably people like you everywhere, an regular conversation would go like this:

    "DA!!! DID U HERE??? WE BETTR THAN AMERICANS"

    "DA!!!! VODKA 4 EVRBODY!!!!!!!"

    nothing but anti-americanism and racism, i would never waste my money to go to russia!

  • @hotpocketpoison This is why America in the shit no ? I dont see Russia going bankrupt on 2nd of August :) Your attitude mimics that of American Imperialism. By the way Mr.Yanky we have more friends in the world that you. But his is another story :) Have a Nice Day ;)

  • @SubZero1703 friends like who??? India?Kazakhstan?Ukraine? HAHAHA!!! our friends consist of england,germany,japan,canada,a­nd other very powerful countries!

  • @hotpocketpoison You dont have any , as per Public opinion. Look around blind man. Your on your own , NATO is falling apart. And as a matter of a big fact, as per the Military strength and population of such, your quotes of certain countries , which are debatable at this present time are the minority. BRIC nations on there own dwarfs NATO, let alone the Arab continent and north africa. You indeed need to open your eyes and look around. England , not very powerful at all.

  • @SubZero1703 england has a population of 51million people and some of the best military hardware out there. they would be a formidable opponent to ANY aggressor.germany has a population of 81million people and some of the best military equipment out there,again,a VERY powerful opponent.the US has a population of 308million people and THE best military equipment out there.if JUST these 3 countries(not counting the rest of NATO) were to team up,we could EASILY take over the world!

  • @hotpocketpoison Didn't England already try that and get sent home ? :) Listen, be serious mate. China, Russia, India, Iran, South Afrika, Argentina,Brasil, Venezuela, Afghanistan,Iraq, Pakistan,North Korea. Just China Alone outnumbers NATO 3 times over On troops count, noe even considering military hardware. The rest I'll let you Wiki for yourself. All the hardware in the world makes no odds, Afghanistan 10 years and losing. I rest my case. Terrainn and Tactics rule.

  • @SubZero1703 who the hell says population wins wars??? chinas(and every other country you listed) military technology is decades behind the US. we won the war in the middle east long ago,but only a brainwashed foreigner like yourself wouldnt see that. saddam and osama are both dead,al quida and taliban are both crippled and the only reason we are still there is to keep the peace while the afghani and iraqi governments get their shit together.

  • @hotpocketpoison I think you best do some background. Your way off the mark. Al Quaeda and the Muhijadeen have never been stronger. You failed to mention Afghanistan. Alot of my mates are still in the forces and without a doubt we are getting our asses whooped. Please don't quote propaganda to me mate , i'm too old and long in the tooth for it. Im neither brainwashed ,nor a foreigner. Just was the boots on ground.! If that helps!

  • @SubZero1703 explain how the US is getting beaten in the middle east(or afghanistan)...im expecting a reply, because out of all the people who say we are loosing NONE can give me a straight answer as to how.

  • @hotpocketpoison It is a known fact that the MOD and the DOD are both lying about the numbers aof troops being killed in the Stan. I personally know 5 guys after there second tour brought themselves out. Isnt it amazing that the name "Taliban" is not openly connected with the name Muhijadeen. The Muhijadeen were heavily backed by the USA in 1974 to counter the Russian ground war . So basically USA and NATO are fighting the seed of there own creation. Ironic isnt it.

  • @SubZero1703 you still havnt given me a straight answer,so ill say it again,slower,so you can understand >(H.O.W A.R.E W.E L.O.O.S.I.N.G)<??? cant answer...didnt think so, why? BECAUSE WE ALREADY WON!!! YOU FAIL, i knew you were just another fucking braindead moron who knows NOTHING about the world around him,just go jerk off to conspiracy theories or something because unless you can give me a LOGICAL reason as to why we are *chuckles* "loosing"in the middle east IM DONE WITH YOUR ASS!!!

  • @hotpocketpoison Ok cunt up to you. Keep dreaming the American dream Loser :) and dont fking reply, hate seeing your drivel in my inbox. SHOW ME YOUIR PASSPORT FUCKER I bet you dont even have one LMFAO!

  • @SubZero1703 WOW, way to not answer my question again. i guess if i can take one thing out of this argument it is this: me:1 you:0 LOL HAHAHAHAHA XD

  • @teltelamont Invorrect and your american, got to love your patriotism over an aircraft that is 45% grounded due to computer software failure.

  • fake

  • + Don't add any of those F-35 Stealth whatever... F-35 is not a stealthy as F-22(No longer in production)... Su-35BM has also Stealth versions using Plasma Stealth System etc...

  • @Demosai there is no such thing as plasma stealth so stfu

  • An F-35 is not match for a Su-37. The only great thing of F-35 is that it could Hover + its a Copy of Russian 1987 Yak-141 the Father of F-35. >:)

  • @Demosai its not copy of the yak141, and irts 35x better\, your just an old soviet communist

  • @Demosai even the Herrier jump jet was around in 1969, long before the Yak-141 and even befor the Yak-38. so we didnt "copy" off the russians because the brits made a VTOL jet before you did...dumbass

  • @Demosai you never know

  • @Demosai you forgot the  harrier u rusfag

  • Comment removed

  • @Demosai For sure Lockheed part funded the development of the Yak-141 after the collapse of the Soviet Union and I'm sure they took as much knowledge as possible... but it's a hellava stretch to say the F35 is a copy of a failed ex- soviet era design...

  • @Demosai false... only the USMC version of the F35 can hover... it replaced the Harrier. the USAF and US NAVY have completely different capabilities.

  • @Demosai You're nuts. They look nothing alike. The f-35 is an improvement on the harrier, Hornet, and F-22. Russia hates the US because our stuff works and yours doesn't

  • @Demosai Thank you, someone finally says it. Like VTOL has anything to do with air superiority, cuz if it did, man, that GR9 harrier was the beast of the skies... >_>. Never seen the F-35 execute a herbst manuever or a pugachev cobra, or even roll at a higher than 50 degree AoA, '5th gen' without 3D thrust vectoring, yeah okaaay

  • It's all about Stealth. If you weapons system can't see them, you can't shoot them down.

  • PAK/FA or J-20 may be comparable enemies for an f-35 but not the su-37...

  • @4V14T10N tjhe su37 is crap, it cant competye with the f35 or f22

  • In battle with su-37, f-35 is capsule of death :)

  • Comment removed

  • @nanoteckh ha ha

    usa suck

  • Fantasy, grandiosity, dreams of former greatness, really the truth of this mania among russian plane enthusiasts is magical-thinking. Su and PAKFA planes are just claims without any proof, and I don't want to be a dick, but given Russia's state of affairs I doubt it can field even mig-29s in REALITY. Only 2 Su-37's? PROOF that this is just a show, a display for Russian govt.

  • The F35 is a conscious being, such high computing and awareness of environment, good weapons system...it's got the edge.

  • the f-35 hase a shorter take off destins the the su-37

  • почему не F-35 vs ЯК-141?

  • in a dogfight, there is no contest, su-37. However, if both are approaching each other from long distances away, f- 35 will probably win

  • @MetalHindu lol there are no "dog fights" any more. Planes are too fast and have much better technology now a days. The US doesn't make there planes to "dog fight", no point to because we will sh1t on any other plane b4 it is even on there radar.

  • @IamYoddle Well, yes u are correct by saying that there arent dogfights anymore. But then why doesnt the US just modify their f-117, so that they can carry larger payloads, have better radar, and carry an air to air armament. Im sorry to say, every manufacturer of fighter aircraft is obsessed with the idea of Air superiority, which includes making their plane better in a dogfight than their opponents plane. So back to my original statement. If the two EVER WERE to get into a dogfight, su-37 wins

  • America:"we have a plane that hovers!"

    Russia:"we have a plane that shoots down planes that hover".

  • @kelmag13 and we have the f22 that will shoot down any plane u throw at it

  • @dopeabc1231 yeah but obamas canceling the f-22 program

  • Nice calm music for the F35 and ominous music for Su 37. Cower in fear, Westerners!

  • @examples262 yes your 2 airshow performing Su-37s are really something to be afraid of.

  • Those terrible scary show-planes are going to crash into a lot of innocent people one of these days! PROOF: they are more deadly than any US plane. Such jagoff patriotic russian bullshit. Kremlin has small penis syndrome again. We'll throw some of them over the barrelhead if they want, just give it to a client state and you WILL see the US beat these "unbeatable" planes...once again. I actually wish the Russians would have a shot too, such pretty planes to blow up, c'mon cool off boys.

  • @examples262 Mhmmmmm.

    It's calm cause it's invisible.

    All that noise the su37 makes, it's like a drunk trucker.

  • @matchbox2022 Invisible only for USA' radar systems , and when the weapons bay is closed.

  • f35 looks like chineese crap

  • The f-35 is a bad idea all around, it's too small to be an effective attack plane, not maneuverable enough to be a dogfighter, not enough range or speed to be an interceptor. And now it's too expensive to build.

    If it is built, it will be outclassed in every area long before 2050.

    They let the Navy insist on a vtol-capable plane, and they got another Osprey. If the navy had its way it would have 2 engines too.

  • Dude even though I am in afjrotc and love the f22 I thought the russians should of kept making the su-47 I loved it

  • yes

  • flawed video, shows one ability of the F-35, the least impressive to watch vertical landing.. then goes to high speed maneuverability of the Su-37.

    thumbs way down.

  • bagus banget

    

  • su 37 is better than F35. check out the 720 degree turn. and sudden speed.

  • brillini tribruskra

    

  • @Dante6322 a fight is small and short a war is very large and go a long time

  • my thinking is america build machines for fighting russia allways build machines for war . i´am not a expert just thinking that way

  • @TheMatze461 its basicly the same thing

  • looks like a Su-30 Mk2 like the we have in venezuela.

  • F-35 is a multirole, whereas the Su-37 is an air dominance fighter, I really don't see how an F-35 could win in an air to air engagement, the power and maneuverability of the Su-37 would far outweigh the stealth of the F-35. That's if Sukhoi ever gets their ass in gear and get an aircraft into production.

  • @childsca All the SU 37 technology is being put into the SU 35BM,Have fun waiting another 10 years for that plane

  • ANY Flanker will have every plane in the world for breakfast..(.except for the Raptor of course)..F35 is a slow medium fighter bomber......(an old Phantom can out turn it)...F35 is a good plane for its role...but that role isn't fighting Flankers! lolol....To fight Flankers you'd need Raptors....or Flankers with better upgades!..nothing in the west apart from F22 can stand against a Flanker.

  • ok every1 shut up simple fact is the f35 is the best besides the f22 and in some cases is better than the f22

  • как мне надоели эти дилетантские "наша крутая хрень" vs "их крутая хрень" . тьфу на вас. Су-37 уже нет, а о возможностях f-35 вы ничего толком не знаете. Тьфу на вас еще раз

  • The F-35 is the 2nd best Military aircraft in the world besides the F-22. This is because it has the 2nd best Stealth capabilities and it's the most technological aircraft in the world. Its computers are so amazing in there that the plane is basically flying you. And the SU-37 is a Russian experimental aircraft. It will NEVER be in service.

  • @Fulcrum22 I beg to differ, the f-35 project had nothing to do with Russia at all.

    The UK helped with the VTOL in the engine design etc. But that is basically the only country that got involved other than the United States. If Russia helped make it, i'm sure they would be getting some but a simple google search shows rissia had nothing to do with it and the only countries getting it revealed are: the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway and Denmark.

  • go go go USA our country you wouldnt dare to lose with those damn ruissians do you so keep fighting!!!! we are the most strongest country in the world!!!!!!

  • Dont think of the F35 as a fighter like the SU37. The F35 is basically a B2 bomber but given fighting capabilities and better stealth incase it has fighter jets come up to take it out. B2's were unarmed and were shot down in the gulf war, bombers need to be armed for dogfights nowadays. The F22 would be the jet to fight the SU37, and would most likely beat the SU37 because a) it has stealth technology B) is ever so just faster, C) and has better onboard technology.

  • @dadubs93 sorry men but ur wrong f-35 is three times men three times faster than speed of sound but f-22 is only twice

  • @dadubs93 what ? you think a B2 is shot ? wtf idiot ? there are only 21 B2-spirits built and one crashed at Guam due to computer failure. my god you are such an idiot...

  • @MrAzzman31 Forgive me, i can see how my comment angered you so much you felt the need to call me an idiot. I mistakened the B2 for an F117, idiot.

    You really do live up to your namesake, MrAzzman

  • @dadubs93 ye i know... burn in hell bitch if there is one ofc...

  • the su-37 would take a f-35 for 1 reason her jammier pods though 120 aimD will never hit. The worst part once the su-37 sees the f-35 it game over as the f-35 is too slow too out run her the f-22 has the option too bug out try again later.

  • What are you talking about, ordinary mig_29 won this be your f-22

  • the su is just unbeattable

  • I go for the SU-37

  • @FamGuyTv10 i go for the f-35 i woudnt dispase my country i love my country and they will make an f-35 corrupted version or upgraded with optical camoflauge making it impossible to see in naked aye and in any kind of radar too even anti stealth

  • @supremokulaba I used to think that as well but the F22 is much faster than the F-35. The F-22 goes Mach2.5, whereas the F35 is Mach 1.7. - The F35 is basically an armed, faster version of a bomber, where as the F22 is a fighter jet which needs to be very fast.

  • f-35 better supersonic plane vertical takeoff and landing aircraft

  • @rolandtran10 yes ur right

  • lol

    right before 2meters away from reaching the land using the 'helicopter ability'

    maybe can get shoot by other plane :P

    too damn long to land

  • 0:40 the flame back there was damn beauty

  • F35 Cant Reach Mach 2

  • they should create a fighter planes face of ..... all of our curiousity would end when that happen.... imagine how much money will the director makes........ just think about it...

  • @tisfatty The only way that would happen would be in a war between 2 countries that would have any of those top fighters. This war would likely be WWIII. The cost of just 1 of those aircrafts is well above the average hollywood blockbuster. Consider at least 2 of those. Add in the rest of the movie expenses (fuel, cast, ...). Military contractors don't sell to move studios, but allied goverments. And not in the unit. The list goes on and on. If it would ever happen whole studio goes bankrupt.

  • e.o ..thats X35(The F35 Before all the other developments.)

    egh.. both are beauitful jet and both planes are awesome

    F35 has a 360degrees situational awareness, and gives the pilot the splits of second to take action.

    Su 37 on the other hand, has a amazing super maneuverity, giving the plane a huge chances of evading missiles.

    so to me they are both nice ...Imagine wht it would be like if Russians and USA unites :o .....

  • the f35 is a ugly bitch and slow as fuck! but the su 37 is much more fast and agile and can kick the f 35's ass anyday!! GO USSR!!

  • this is no contest, the f-35 will take out any plane u care to name in a heartbeat. su-37 is a watered down f-22

  • That here to compare? Modernized Harrier and Su-37?! Funnily, very funnily. The airplane of WW2 will destroy F-35 in a couple of seconds. LOL

  • true true

  • SU 37 Terminator! :D I wish to see some USA plane to do stuffs like this! I know that few crashed trying to do stunts that SU does with no trouble at all... I'm not nationalistic, i'm just realistic. Russians have best planes, no doubts. :) even if you denie that they do, they certainly have best pilots!

  • @stefanSRBSp93 How about the HIMAT and X-31? After all that's where modern TV came from. The X-31 can achieve max aoa at over 400kts while sustaining max g load. The only other aircraft in the world that can do that is the EF-2000. There is a reason only two Su37s were made. Once you load more than 35% fuel that aircraft loses a great deal of mobility and can no longer hang a highA That's why you never see weapons on it in these demos. The Superhornet is more maneuverable with weapons.

  • @aeroshark1 хи-хи , радары уже другие и про стелс похоже пора забыть....

  • @aeroshark1 the reason only 2 su-37's were made is they were expensive technology testbeds.

    superhornets may be great planes but they're nowhere near as maneuverable as an su-27, let alone su-30 or su-35, with any weapon load.

  • @kozmon0t its actually is extremely maneuverable not sure where you get your info from but the plane is one of the most maneuverable jets there is

  • @rickg156 Maybe I pay attention to little things like max AoA, corner speed, min turn radius, min turn rate, the kind of things they don't usually write in the specifications, but which maneuverability is all about.

    No plane without OVT is anywhere near being among the most maneuverable. Planes with OVT and differential thrust are in a class by themselves.

    F-18's are still valuable, most air combat doesn't end up in low-speed dogfights.

  • @aeroshark1 that is why the Su 37 is not yet in its final configuration, new more powerful engines will be put on airplanes to go into production!

  • @stefanSRBSp93 , Most of russia's planes can't even get off the ground, the only ones that work are the ones that really work for demonstration and those still fuck up, the U.S. f-22 and the f-35 are the most advanced planes out there right now. an F-22 can take out an entire squadron of f-18's only using its gun. the 22, and the 35 are virtually untraceble on radar.

  • @stefanSRBSp93 FUCK YA!!!

  • the f35 is better is faster have more power than the slow su 37wichis to slow to fight against the f35 or f22

  • @platinumCG1 lmfao you have no idea what you are talking about moron hahah you said it right only backwards, SU are better cheaper, they dont come from peoples pockets, they are just better in every aspect like Ak47 against m16 you know what i mean, ak is cheaper more powerful, better etc

  • @polzowatel cherper is the su but not better no doubts about it

  • The F-35 is a multi-role fighter. Its not made for dog-fighting but for air support and bombing. Still, the SU-37 is a clunker so this would be a decent match-up. The F-22 would be a different story tho lol.

  • @Supremist77 jack of all traits, master of none?

  • It does out perform the f-35, but then again the f-35 is a ground attack aircraft with limited stealth for air to air. Lets compare apples to apples. Say the su-37 against the F-22 Raptor. There the sU-27 will get its butt handed to him.

  • oooh su-37 the most great super jet in the world!!!!nobody can not fight with it!!!

  • @999nikitosik кипящего, тупорылого патриота сразу же выдают обилие восклицательных знаков, ник. отсюда вывод о возрасте(или это болезнь уже на любой стаж жизни ложится?). не пались. твой хуй длиннее - главное в это верить.

  • @999nikitosik It can't hold any weapons. Only two were made and the aircraft cannot perform at greater than 35% fuel.

  • F-22 y F-35 son superiores a cualquier avion ruso,frances etc...

  • F35 has stealth, automatically wins.

  • nuff said

  • наш сушка круче выглядит

  • @pay40k Mhm, cause the looks of an aircraft make it better? You make me laugh.

  • @pay40k И это при том, что сушка -- 4-ка, а фешка уже 5-ка, хотя вертикалка тупо слизана с ЯК-38, просто в нём херни электронной понапихано до хера.

  • su 37 queimando tudo até a ultima ponta...

  • mejor f22 que le vula la raja a todos los SU