It was suggested to one of the HSF leaders that our testimony posted on our FB page via YouTube was "unfairly" launched from that global podium, though it was appropriate for live delivery in Columbus. The commenter agreed that no parts of the example in the video were false or needed to be corrected, but that the individuals referenced anonymously were easily identifiable by co-workers at our local school.
The commenter further agreed that the problems mentioned continue to this day (which we already knew). HSF leaders considered this input and collected opinions from outsiders on the matter. We have determined that, while it may create uncomfortable moments between a small sector of Hudson employees, the video's availability to the wider audience (who could not identify the school or individuals without some significant research) is too important to take it down or redact portions thereof.
We will remind viewers that the example was used not to pick on any individual(s), but to highlight the expensive and unjust employment system the public has been captive of for decades. Apparently, it struck a nerve along the way. As always, we welcome comments and input on either the FB page or the YouTube site.
It was suggested to one of the HSF leaders that our testimony posted on our FB page via YouTube was "unfairly" launched from that global podium, though it was appropriate for live delivery in Columbus. The commenter agreed that no parts of the example in the video were false or needed to be corrected, but that the individuals referenced anonymously were easily identifiable by co-workers at our local school.
SGNorman 10 months ago
The commenter further agreed that the problems mentioned continue to this day (which we already knew). HSF leaders considered this input and collected opinions from outsiders on the matter. We have determined that, while it may create uncomfortable moments between a small sector of Hudson employees, the video's availability to the wider audience (who could not identify the school or individuals without some significant research) is too important to take it down or redact portions thereof.
SGNorman 10 months ago
We will remind viewers that the example was used not to pick on any individual(s), but to highlight the expensive and unjust employment system the public has been captive of for decades. Apparently, it struck a nerve along the way. As always, we welcome comments and input on either the FB page or the YouTube site.
SGNorman 10 months ago