@animaljp3 The total energy content of the universe is 0. That's great thing about the laws of nature and quantum mechanics. It wasn't 'nothing'. When a physicist says 'nothing' he/she means nothing we could imagine. It was an infantesimaly small point, with an infantesimaly high mass and thereby with an infantesimaly high gravitational pull. 'E=MC^2 (or Energy = Mass x (3x10^8)^2)' this equation means that mass and energy are interchangable, 2 sides of the same coin.
@animaljp3 w......what? I answered your 'point'. You have a better idea than Prof. Stephen Hawking? You go ahead and collect your nobel prize buddy. You'll be a millionare. Go! Now!
@animaljp3 You didn't bother to watch the video. What you have no idea about is dark energy and dark matter, which actually make up over 95% of the entire universe. All the normal matter like stars, planets, asteroids, rocks, dust, gasses all matter that you could know of only accounts for less than 5% of all the mass in the universe. What the other 90% of the mass and energy is, is a complete mystery. Balancing the equation has little to do with your existence, but neither does a Deity.
@animaljp3 Why are you fixated on this? One theory is that there is no such thing as nothing. There are quantum fluctuations where matter can spontaneously appear and disappear and there is energy in empty space. I gave you a cosmologist who tells you why there is no such thing as nothing, and you keep repeating: "... cannot come from nothing". No one claims it did.
@coolgreyoneabby any evidence matter is constant, Going against the rest of science? God gave us a bible, in it prophesies are made and they came true elsewhere, even in "athiest" history. "here are quantum fluctuations where matter can spontaneously appear and disappear and there is energy in empty space." something from nothing even in YOUR own words!
@animaljp3 God did not give you the Bible, Jesus did not give you the Bible and contrary to Christian beliefs, the apostles did not write any of it either. Man gave man the Bible. Even theist biblical scholars know this. Why don't you?
Because we have no idea how dna got its codes to do what it does. We dont even know how dna came to be with out organic life because with out life dna dies and with out dna you cant get life
@cjguitarist100 That is the part about evolution that you did not understand. Evolution is NOT random. Natural selection is called SELECTION for a reason, not natural random stuff. The first part of evolution, change and mutation is random, but after that, natural selection weeds out failure and selects for survival. Picture a slot machine where every time an individual reel hits a jackpot, you could hold that reel and spin the rest. It would not take long to hit the jackpot all the way across.
@coolgreyoneabby "Picture a slot machine where every time an individual reel hits a jackpot, you could hold that reel and spin the rest. It would not take long to hit the jackpot all the way across."
~ So you keep all the wins and never does a negative mutation occur killing the organism. (resetting the machine and taking your money)
~ Natural selection does not answer how the complex DNA code needed to operate a single cell originated. You need first life to have nat selct.
@superdoobo No, the point is how positive changes accumulate. Failures happen all the time, its just that they are quickly weeded out and die off. Natural selection begins to work once you have reproduction and variation, Life started with simple chemistry then worked up to more complex chemistry, then moving into very simple life like chemistry and eventually building up to DNA. DNA did not spontaneously erupt without a predecessor. How else could it have happened?
@coolgreyoneabby "DNA did not spontaneously erupt without a predecessor. How else could it have happened?" You essentially have two choices, Since you can't have natural selection BEFORE life. You either believe a higher intellect put the complex code there or it occurred by random chance, those odds being approximately 10^80 or roughly the same number of atoms in the universe. So lets mark a single atom with your name on it and hide it in the universe. Now find it.
@superdoobo You fell into the Creationists false argument of: "I can't figure out how X could have happened, therefore it must have been God" To see the scientifically supported way that Abiogenisis happens please Youtube search: The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak.
@superdoobo So your explanation is a higher intelligence? Intelligence is product of life. You can't explain the beginnings of life with a product of life. Where did that intelligence come from? Sounds like illogical circular reasoning that could only come about by belief in religious superstitions.
@superdoobo My original comment: "...natural selection weeds out failure and selects for survival." and you then ask: "...never does a negative mutation occur killing the organism?" No, I just said that failure is just weeded out. Creationists see only what they want to see while they stick there fingers in their ears and sing La La La.
Random it is. If you were not random, it would be by design. A small percentage of the mutations experienced by every organism are positive for improved survival. All sorts of enviromental stressors push Natural Selection, and those mutations that work best for survival despite the stressors are passed on.
@ftwuh It is easy to argue syntax, and Natural Selection, as a product of mutation(s), is not random as the beneficial mutations select for improved survival; however, the mutations themselves are quite random in the sense that there is no directional force given rise to them. If If mutations were not random, all Humans would be immune to most infectious diseases; we would all live for more than 100 years. There is no director, no god running the show.
@detroitboy65 I don't believe in any kind of god. I say it isn't completely random because the creatures survive in certain conditions and thats what drives the mutations.
how is evolution a dangorous idea? it is a process by God, so it does not attack religian. Saying people are animals is just another resean not to dystroy this planet. HOW is this dangorous?
@animaljp3 Ok so you believe in god so do i and i also consider evolution but with intelligence in the bible it says all life came from the waters and adam and eve were both made in a form of evolution adam from yhe earth and eve from adams rib all signs of possible evolution
@animaljp3 There had to be some other outside force to program the dna to make life the way it does what came first dna or life but dna had to have a vessel for it to function once it is created it can replicate itself and also repair itself. I mean how can life come from inorganic material when we know that doesnt work we cant throw dna in the ground and expect a life to come out of it just doesnt happen so there had to be a vessel of organic life and someone or something put the dna in it
@animaljp3 There had to be some other outside force to program the dna to make life the way it does what came first dna or life but dna had to have a vessel for it to function once it is created it can replicate itself and also repair itself. I mean how can life come from inorganic material when we know that doesnt work we cant throw dna in the ground and expect a life to come out of it just doesnt happen so there had to be a vessel of organic life and someone or something put the dna in it
@animaljp3 Search on "Darwin" and "Stalin" you can see how many of the communist ideas are based on the belief that man is just another animal. It inevitably leads to death and destruction, Stalin for example was trying to implement social Darwinism.
@animaljp3 "social darwinism is not darwinism" while this may be technically true. it is the logical destination. If people are merely animals then the human mind can justify things such as killing off the handicap, elderly and any other undesirables. Both Stalin and Hitler are prime examples of Darwinian theory taken to their logical ends.
@superdoobo Wow, 100% wrong. Hitler and his minions were Christians. Most of the Nazis were Catholics. This idea that Hitler was an Atheist is just made up bunk to hide that the Nazis were Christians. Second, "Darwinism" is an archaic term. Since the theory of evolution has been updated, we now call it Evolutionary Theory which is a supported and accepted scientific theory explaining the diversity of life. It is not a political or social ideology.
@coolgreyoneabby No offense but that's a typical public school education answer. Did he use Christianity to further his aim? Sure. But do you really picture Hitler, who is responsible for the death of six million Jews to sit in devout worship of a Jewish man (Jesus Christ)? I think not. I think you just want to bash Christianity, But your notion is silly. He was as Christian as Obama is. NOT.
@superdoobo Let me guess. You vote Republican, watch Fox News, Think Sean Hannity and Rush are patriots, think that evolution and man made global warming are both a hoax and God created a talking snake in Eden that spoke to Eve, and a 900 year old man built an ark then loaded it with every "kind" of animal on earth for the flood that wiped out all other land animals and people. I'll bet I got most of those right.
@coolgreyoneabby So it's not really about evolution for you, It's about the concept of God. You can't stand the idea that when the end of this life comes, You will be held accountable for your life and how it was lived. You think somehow if you can convince yourself there is no God and this is all random chance you'll sleep better at night, You hate the fact there is a right and wrong and it conflicts with your liberalism. You hate the concept of sin because you want to indulge
@superdoobo You are 100% wrong again. It is not science that makes the study of our origins and evolution about God, It is the you, theist. You can't stand the idea that science has constantly pushed back what had once been attributed to your God. Rain, disease and movement of heavenly bodies were all once attributed to Gods. Now we have natural explanations that even theists like you should accept. But you still feel a need to cling to your origin myths even though that has been explained too.
@animaljp3 And your answer to this question is: "Since I can't figure out how matter and energy can come from nothing, there must be an intelligent loving sky daddy who poofed everything into existence by magic." How about first questioning if there really was nothing at the beginning? If you say that God preceded the universe, why not save a step and just say the big band trigger preceeded the universe? What evidence is there of the magic sky daddy?
@animaljp3 If you are really honestly interested in the question,and not just pushing the God from ignorance argument, you can Youtube search: Universe from Nothing by Lawrence Krauss. He is a physicist who studies cosmological origins via vacuum quantum fluctuation.
@superdoobo You just want to convince yourself that there is a God, because you can't stand the idea that when you die your bland and boring life will be over, and you cease to exist.
@superdoobo No offense, but to those of us who went to college, studied the sciences, did the work to understand how to set up experiments, define protocol, set up controls, establish statistical significance, calculate standard deviation, and confidence levels, weed out biases and make a comprehensive scientifically responsible report, it is painfully obvious that you have no such training or education. It is no wonder you still believe in magic for our origins.
@coolgreyoneabby Wow you use a lot of big complicated words, Please post a link to some of your scientific studies I would love to read them. As far as magic there is nothing more magical then believing basic chemicals arranged themselves on their own to create something as complex as the human mind. That's magic, but even so we both know that even magic requires a magician.
for creationsists I only have two words: common ancestors.
A difference exists between facts and beliefs... and evolution has been proven as a fact. Natural selection and mutation have developed life into a marvelous variety of species (which, by the way, we humans have been destroying or several centuries).
@animaljp3 And you also need evidence to prove it right. So if gravity is a theory then so is evolution its not called the fact of evolution its called the theory of evolution just like gravity anybody that calls evolution a fact is a moron its not its just wishfull thinking and ignorance on your part to call a theory a fact is ascenine might as well call the theory of gravity fact
@animaljp3 A theory is an unproven idea of something like for me to say your black without proof would be a theory now until i have proof that says you are its a theory something not prove now im not racist im just giving an example. Boy if we can say a theory is a fact then there would be alot of innocent people sent to jail just on what people believe with out real supportive evidence
@MrDanann And by the way funny how mutations changed evrything when a mutation happens today its still the same species not a totally different one and dna also shows that it will never let a totally different species happen. And something becoming immune to something is not evolution its a slight variation which dna allows but does not allow a totally different species
To sciencefan1859 no im not blind you are blind and ignorant is that the best you can do you think it hurts my feelings i would rather believe in something that makes the more you read about evolution the more stupid it becomes and to think people actually believe this crap and call it fact when its not any true athiest would tell you that evolution is far from being factual and they would also tell you that there is no transitional fossils that they dont prove shit
@animaljp3 And so what if it had an arched foot it means nothing thats like saying because I have the same colored eyes or hair someone else has im related to them no it dont.Just like the retro virus that also means nothing we get the bird flu but does that mean we evolved from birds to nope dont think so and dogs and cats also get the rhino virus does that mean were related nope and apes dogs and cats also get aids but we cant get it from any of them does that mean were related because we
@cjguitarist100 parallel evolution, the fact they have hooves is not link, but different hooves mean they arnt. no other animal has oppisible thumbs like people
@animaljp3 But your saying because we have simularities with apes we came from them and apes do have opposable thumbs just like us and pigs have the same hooves as all the deer family
@animaljp3 We share simularities nope and why do all the fossils of things that were suppose to have evolved still look the same as they did millions of years ago no evolution there like the horse shoe crab,shrimp,clams,alligators and crocks. And if evolution was true how could the amphibian mate if there were no others they couldnt have evolved at the same time if it takes millions of years to evolve.
@animaljp3 See just because we have these singularities does not mean we came from them and so we have thumbs dogs have a thumb to the only thing is is its higher up on the leg that means nothing and dogs and cats have forward facing eyes so whats your point
@cjguitarist100 there is still evolution in those, just not much. they are well adapted already to change. evolution is traits exaggerated, it is very slow, populations do it.
Allows for we all do it but im not a different species now am I. And the case of the moths is bullshit to it was prooven they changed color because of coal and pollutants just as the trees changed not because of evolution they simply got black because of soot not because they decided to be black morons
@cjguitarist100 they were already black and white, the black ones were eaten before, then black trees made it go the other way. Extinction of white means black provalled, thus evolution happened.
@animaljp3 ya end there still is white ones this theory was debunked and it is still in the textbooks typical. And your so called tiktalic was also disproved it was all amphibian. A fish cant crawl up on land only having lungs for water and over a long period of time become something different its impossible take a fish put on land and see what happens. Mostly everthing they say is transitional or the missing link is always proved wrong but yet they keep them in the books. their all fraudulent.
@cjguitarist100 FISH BREATHE THROUGH GILLS. they can use swim bladder to breath like LUNGFISH and MUDSKIPPERS. HOW was the moth theory debunked? You saying so? stupid Idiot that was randomly saying stuff? and you never said anything about arched foot ape
@animaljp3 well idiot evrytime i went fishing and had my catch on a stringer those fish did not survive very long out of water they didnt seem to use their swim bladder and the mud skipper cant survive out of water very long either and no shit fish breath through gills duh yea i never said anything about arched foot apes because most of the so called missing links were all proven fraudulent like neanderthall man and so on and when was the last time you saw a fish crawl out of the water and
@cjguitarist100 mud skippers DRY OUT like an AMPHIBIAN!!!! mudskippers, walking catfish, eels, snake heads and lungfish all are fish i have seen on youtube, other internet sites animal planet, discovery. neaderthals have hundreds of fossils. Austrethopificus has arched foot and made footprints.
@cjguitarist100 We can not do that because that would go agianst EVERYTHING evolution is about. Evolution is the best traited organisms surviving, reproducing and with that exaggerating the traits
@animaljp3 And its funny how when it comes to humans that our ancestors mysteriously went extinct but other species ancestors didnt and the fish we supposidly evolved from is still alive today unchanged over millions of years so what fish did we evolve from and why do all amphibians look the same as they did millions of years ago.
@cjguitarist100 the first part is extinction, not evolution. Amphibians used to be huge, salamander LIKE creatures. evolution is POPULATION not SPECIES change I already answered that last.
@cjguitarist100 it is not SPECIES but population. if a Couger in Canada has a light coat, why would one in Arizona? evolution is only in places where the trait is good
@animaljp3 and how are 99 percent of species extinct when the fossil records show just about everything alive today besides the dinosaours and a few extinct animals
@animaljp3You cant say a certain person robbed a bank with out evidence. And you also need evidence to prove they didnt do it it works both ways not just one sided
@cjguitarist100 And that evidence is fingerprints or they caught them on security tape with their face exposed or someone recognises them. There has to be proof both ways you cant have a theory and call it fact as simple as that
@animaljp3 And if the theory of gravity has no evidence for it how can it still be theory thats science contradicting itself. A theory is an unproven idea about something with no evidence.You need evidence to prove something fact or fiction so when something cant be proven to be fact or fiction it becomes a theory there for something unproven on both fact or fiction. The theory of evolution does not have evidence to prove its real fact and also has no proof to say its fiction.Thus you get theory
@cjguitarist100 In order to call a theory fact you need evidence beyond a doubt to call it fact and if theres so much evidence to call evolution fact then why is it still theory if theres so much evidence to over ride fiction then they should just call it fact but they cant because a theory is lack of evidence to support it on both fact and fiction a theory is not evidence in its self that makes no sense we would have to get rid of theory and say fact if the evidence is already there
@cjguitarist100 the Bible was metaphoric in Genesis. Made for people without science and to change there religion, not give them science. evidence is thousands of years written and never goes against itself and makes prophesys in which all the old ones came true.
@animaljp3 many times, the Bible is metaphoric so people at that time could figure it out. it talks about The sun stopping in the sky in a battle, and fruit as good deeds and thoughts.
@animaljp3 hell as being thrown out of a party, and all of Jesus's parables. Revolution has to be metaphoric, if it wasn't every one would believe in God as Satan attacks.
@animaljp3 also, all of the scientific evidence like vestigial parts, missing links like tiktalic and dinos, radio dating, continental drift at 1 inch a year and organisms that could not cross ocean distance MUCH greater that Galapagos. so stop dounting. Here is the evidence. Or are you blind to science and metaphors?
@animaljp3 artificial selection that made pets and most fruit, plants in Alaska were tropical, and the verity on island species and not AS much on mainland.
@cjguitarist100 like what? evolution, has dinos, austrethopificus arched foot, vestigial parts, opposible thumbs for us, MAN MADE SELECTION, like all pets and most food. there is NO evidence against
@animaljp3 No not all dinasours have hollow bones they would not be able to support their heavy weight so thats not true and not all dinasours had feathers either if any that wasnt proved to be an already existing bird and funny how they evolved to birds being they found a fossilized bird just as you would see today 65 million years older than the ones with the feathers now it just went backwards
@cjguitarist100 the carnivorous ones had hollow bones, the ones evolved into birds. remember dinos are a family, not small group. 65 million year old birds had teeth. hespornis and icthyornis.
@cjguitarist100 thats right, dinos were ancesters of birds. dinos are familys, and SPECIES dont evolve even, POPULATIONS do. thats why there is organisms still around.
And if nothing can be prooven then your theory of evolution is nothing but belief speculation just like jesus christ evolution is not fact and there is no proof otherwise it would not be a theory you speculate that theres proof and it was not observed in nature or in the lab all that happened in the lab was bacteria becoming immune to something thats not evolution its still the same bacteria when are you guys gonna grow up and get over that bogus bullshit its called a slight variation which dna
well if you want to get on the subject of being imbred we would be imbred to if we evolved because through evolution everything shared a common ancestor of all the living things meaning the ancestor that started everything we would all be related we would all share the same dna
Our tail is recorded in our dna because of the sperm cell not because of an ancestor who had one because all animals have this recorded in their dna. In some animals the dna shuts this off and in some animals it doesnt and sometimes that part of the dna does not shut off for humans and allows a full functioning tail which is called a slight variation which dna allows for or you can call it a mutation either way not evolution because were still human
So because we have a tail bone does not prove evolution we lost it because we no longer needed it as a full fleshed walking upright human we were not ment to have tails. Dogs have them to communicate with each other and to keep balance and reduce drag while running
Yes the reason we have a tail bone is because as a sperm we have a tale but we humans loose it during us being made in the womb. But other animals like lizards and so forth keep their tales
Ya we share most of our dna with apes we also share some chromosones with tobacco plants does that mean were related no. And as far as the things we dont need anymore thats rediculous we actually need that so called tail bone every animal has it try and remove it see what happens and the reason we have that is because as a sperm we have tails just as every animal so what you trying to proove thats not evolution the things we have all have reasons for being there in all the animals
and the so called fossils such as eosimias mean nothing also they are either apes or humans and dna prooves this there is only los in dna not gains like evolution says. When was the last time you seen a human come from an ape.Or a reptile produce a bird it is genetically impossible if this happened it would be in our dna but reptiles and birds share no similarieties. And some fossils look the same now as they did millions of years ago no evolution there
Jus like the so called missing link from reptiles to birds the one bird they found was suppose to be the missing link for reptiles to birds but they also found a fossil of a bird like you would see today 65 million years older than the so called missing link. And it was scientifically prooven that the missing link is 100 percent bird a pirching bird at that not a reptibird but they also keep that in the books as the missing link so fossils mean crap
Just like the one fish fossil that was suppose to be the missing link from fish to amphibians i cant remember the name of the fish but it turned out that the so called missing link is still alive today but evolutionists still keep it in the books and in the museums as the missing link when it was prooved its not the missing link
Amorphustruth first of all there are no missing links if you actually look further into it you will see that there are none even evolutionists say so and ones that are credited that they are missing links are fabricated by using other bones and making them appear to be the missing link and its not see you guys only hear what the evolutionists want you to hear but they leave out all the other things you should hear
Although Charles Darwin came up with the theory of evolution while studying birds from the Galapagos islands, he didn’t tell anyone until he saw a Pikachu evolve into a Raichu. Darwin knew then his theory was super effective.
why was it dangerous, because it was based on fantasy from the Hindu religion and lies to set it apart, and now it is brainwashed into the children of the world. If you want to see what I am talking about view my E.C.G playlist on my channel.
JESUS
onehndrdprcntcreep 1 week ago
This never happened.
dansemacabre17 2 weeks ago
I still do not see how matter and energy can come from nothing.
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 Did you watch the video? According to Krauss, there is no such thing as "nothing"
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 The total energy content of the universe is 0. That's great thing about the laws of nature and quantum mechanics. It wasn't 'nothing'. When a physicist says 'nothing' he/she means nothing we could imagine. It was an infantesimaly small point, with an infantesimaly high mass and thereby with an infantesimaly high gravitational pull. 'E=MC^2 (or Energy = Mass x (3x10^8)^2)' this equation means that mass and energy are interchangable, 2 sides of the same coin.
Alphacaliber 3 weeks ago
@Alphacaliber a balancing equation does not prove we do not exist.
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 w......what? I answered your 'point'. You have a better idea than Prof. Stephen Hawking? You go ahead and collect your nobel prize buddy. You'll be a millionare. Go! Now!
Alphacaliber 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 You didn't bother to watch the video. What you have no idea about is dark energy and dark matter, which actually make up over 95% of the entire universe. All the normal matter like stars, planets, asteroids, rocks, dust, gasses all matter that you could know of only accounts for less than 5% of all the mass in the universe. What the other 90% of the mass and energy is, is a complete mystery. Balancing the equation has little to do with your existence, but neither does a Deity.
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@coolgreyoneabby That 90% of matter can not come from nothing
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 Why are you fixated on this? One theory is that there is no such thing as nothing. There are quantum fluctuations where matter can spontaneously appear and disappear and there is energy in empty space. I gave you a cosmologist who tells you why there is no such thing as nothing, and you keep repeating: "... cannot come from nothing". No one claims it did.
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@coolgreyoneabby any evidence matter is constant, Going against the rest of science? God gave us a bible, in it prophesies are made and they came true elsewhere, even in "athiest" history. "here are quantum fluctuations where matter can spontaneously appear and disappear and there is energy in empty space." something from nothing even in YOUR own words!
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 God did not give you the Bible, Jesus did not give you the Bible and contrary to Christian beliefs, the apostles did not write any of it either. Man gave man the Bible. Even theist biblical scholars know this. Why don't you?
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@coolgreyoneabby man made bible from God
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 Yeah, like authentic antique Prussian vase, made in China yesterday.
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 wheres the evidence for that?
ftwuh 2 weeks ago
@ftwuh prophesies have been made and came true
animaljp3 2 weeks ago
@animaljp3 ?
ftwuh 2 weeks ago
@animaljp3 /watch?v=fpb7NMR-XOo
Alphacaliber 3 weeks ago
Because we have no idea how dna got its codes to do what it does. We dont even know how dna came to be with out organic life because with out life dna dies and with out dna you cant get life
cjguitarist100 1 month ago 2
Im not really against evolution just the part where science says there is no intelligence behind it its just random
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 The forces of nature are behind it.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 That is the part about evolution that you did not understand. Evolution is NOT random. Natural selection is called SELECTION for a reason, not natural random stuff. The first part of evolution, change and mutation is random, but after that, natural selection weeds out failure and selects for survival. Picture a slot machine where every time an individual reel hits a jackpot, you could hold that reel and spin the rest. It would not take long to hit the jackpot all the way across.
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@coolgreyoneabby "Picture a slot machine where every time an individual reel hits a jackpot, you could hold that reel and spin the rest. It would not take long to hit the jackpot all the way across."
~ So you keep all the wins and never does a negative mutation occur killing the organism. (resetting the machine and taking your money)
~ Natural selection does not answer how the complex DNA code needed to operate a single cell originated. You need first life to have nat selct.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo No, the point is how positive changes accumulate. Failures happen all the time, its just that they are quickly weeded out and die off. Natural selection begins to work once you have reproduction and variation, Life started with simple chemistry then worked up to more complex chemistry, then moving into very simple life like chemistry and eventually building up to DNA. DNA did not spontaneously erupt without a predecessor. How else could it have happened?
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@coolgreyoneabby "DNA did not spontaneously erupt without a predecessor. How else could it have happened?" You essentially have two choices, Since you can't have natural selection BEFORE life. You either believe a higher intellect put the complex code there or it occurred by random chance, those odds being approximately 10^80 or roughly the same number of atoms in the universe. So lets mark a single atom with your name on it and hide it in the universe. Now find it.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo You fell into the Creationists false argument of: "I can't figure out how X could have happened, therefore it must have been God" To see the scientifically supported way that Abiogenisis happens please Youtube search: The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak.
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@superdoobo So your explanation is a higher intelligence? Intelligence is product of life. You can't explain the beginnings of life with a product of life. Where did that intelligence come from? Sounds like illogical circular reasoning that could only come about by belief in religious superstitions.
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@superdoobo My original comment: "...natural selection weeds out failure and selects for survival." and you then ask: "...never does a negative mutation occur killing the organism?" No, I just said that failure is just weeded out. Creationists see only what they want to see while they stick there fingers in their ears and sing La La La.
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@coolgreyoneabby I was responding to your slot machine analogy. That's it. I haven't read all of your comments.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 it isn't random.. do you know fucking anything about natural selection?
ftwuh 2 weeks ago
Random it is. If you were not random, it would be by design. A small percentage of the mutations experienced by every organism are positive for improved survival. All sorts of enviromental stressors push Natural Selection, and those mutations that work best for survival despite the stressors are passed on.
detroitboy65 6 days ago
@detroitboy65 natural selection is not random
ftwuh 6 days ago
@ftwuh It is easy to argue syntax, and Natural Selection, as a product of mutation(s), is not random as the beneficial mutations select for improved survival; however, the mutations themselves are quite random in the sense that there is no directional force given rise to them. If If mutations were not random, all Humans would be immune to most infectious diseases; we would all live for more than 100 years. There is no director, no god running the show.
detroitboy65 5 days ago
@detroitboy65 I don't believe in any kind of god. I say it isn't completely random because the creatures survive in certain conditions and thats what drives the mutations.
ftwuh 5 days ago
@ftwuh everything about natural selection is random, and to a certain extent luck
the species we know today came from random mutations and there was luck that the mutation was passed on.
we are here by random chance and luck
systemofastefan 5 days ago
how is evolution a dangorous idea? it is a process by God, so it does not attack religian. Saying people are animals is just another resean not to dystroy this planet. HOW is this dangorous?
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Ok so you believe in god so do i and i also consider evolution but with intelligence in the bible it says all life came from the waters and adam and eve were both made in a form of evolution adam from yhe earth and eve from adams rib all signs of possible evolution
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 stramatilites and cynobacteria, first life from water. The first life came from rocks in both too.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Yes indeed
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 There had to be some other outside force to program the dna to make life the way it does what came first dna or life but dna had to have a vessel for it to function once it is created it can replicate itself and also repair itself. I mean how can life come from inorganic material when we know that doesnt work we cant throw dna in the ground and expect a life to come out of it just doesnt happen so there had to be a vessel of organic life and someone or something put the dna in it
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animaljp3 There had to be some other outside force to program the dna to make life the way it does what came first dna or life but dna had to have a vessel for it to function once it is created it can replicate itself and also repair itself. I mean how can life come from inorganic material when we know that doesnt work we cant throw dna in the ground and expect a life to come out of it just doesnt happen so there had to be a vessel of organic life and someone or something put the dna in it
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And i find it funny that both evolution and the bible says life came from the water
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cjguitarist100 But the bible say man came from clay.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Search on "Darwin" and "Stalin" you can see how many of the communist ideas are based on the belief that man is just another animal. It inevitably leads to death and destruction, Stalin for example was trying to implement social Darwinism.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo social darwinism is not darwinism. people are animals.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 "social darwinism is not darwinism" while this may be technically true. it is the logical destination. If people are merely animals then the human mind can justify things such as killing off the handicap, elderly and any other undesirables. Both Stalin and Hitler are prime examples of Darwinian theory taken to their logical ends.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo Wow, 100% wrong. Hitler and his minions were Christians. Most of the Nazis were Catholics. This idea that Hitler was an Atheist is just made up bunk to hide that the Nazis were Christians. Second, "Darwinism" is an archaic term. Since the theory of evolution has been updated, we now call it Evolutionary Theory which is a supported and accepted scientific theory explaining the diversity of life. It is not a political or social ideology.
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@coolgreyoneabby No offense but that's a typical public school education answer. Did he use Christianity to further his aim? Sure. But do you really picture Hitler, who is responsible for the death of six million Jews to sit in devout worship of a Jewish man (Jesus Christ)? I think not. I think you just want to bash Christianity, But your notion is silly. He was as Christian as Obama is. NOT.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo Let me guess. You vote Republican, watch Fox News, Think Sean Hannity and Rush are patriots, think that evolution and man made global warming are both a hoax and God created a talking snake in Eden that spoke to Eve, and a 900 year old man built an ark then loaded it with every "kind" of animal on earth for the flood that wiped out all other land animals and people. I'll bet I got most of those right.
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@coolgreyoneabby So it's not really about evolution for you, It's about the concept of God. You can't stand the idea that when the end of this life comes, You will be held accountable for your life and how it was lived. You think somehow if you can convince yourself there is no God and this is all random chance you'll sleep better at night, You hate the fact there is a right and wrong and it conflicts with your liberalism. You hate the concept of sin because you want to indulge
superdoobo 4 weeks ago
@superdoobo You are 100% wrong again. It is not science that makes the study of our origins and evolution about God, It is the you, theist. You can't stand the idea that science has constantly pushed back what had once been attributed to your God. Rain, disease and movement of heavenly bodies were all once attributed to Gods. Now we have natural explanations that even theists like you should accept. But you still feel a need to cling to your origin myths even though that has been explained too.
coolgreyoneabby 4 weeks ago
@coolgreyoneabby matter/energy can not come from themselves, how can they come from nothing.
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 And your answer to this question is: "Since I can't figure out how matter and energy can come from nothing, there must be an intelligent loving sky daddy who poofed everything into existence by magic." How about first questioning if there really was nothing at the beginning? If you say that God preceded the universe, why not save a step and just say the big band trigger preceeded the universe? What evidence is there of the magic sky daddy?
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 If you are really honestly interested in the question,and not just pushing the God from ignorance argument, you can Youtube search: Universe from Nothing by Lawrence Krauss. He is a physicist who studies cosmological origins via vacuum quantum fluctuation.
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@coolgreyoneabby so, something from nothing?
animaljp3 3 weeks ago
@animaljp3 watch the video
coolgreyoneabby 3 weeks ago
@superdoobo You just want to convince yourself that there is a God, because you can't stand the idea that when you die your bland and boring life will be over, and you cease to exist.
SuperBspb 4 weeks ago
@superdoobo Oh and I forgot, Obama was not born in the United States, right?
coolgreyoneabby 1 month ago
@coolgreyoneabby oh yea?
superdoobo 4 weeks ago
@superdoobo No offense, but to those of us who went to college, studied the sciences, did the work to understand how to set up experiments, define protocol, set up controls, establish statistical significance, calculate standard deviation, and confidence levels, weed out biases and make a comprehensive scientifically responsible report, it is painfully obvious that you have no such training or education. It is no wonder you still believe in magic for our origins.
coolgreyoneabby 4 weeks ago
@coolgreyoneabby Wow you use a lot of big complicated words, Please post a link to some of your scientific studies I would love to read them. As far as magic there is nothing more magical then believing basic chemicals arranged themselves on their own to create something as complex as the human mind. That's magic, but even so we both know that even magic requires a magician.
superdoobo 4 weeks ago
@superdoobo God created nerves, simple cells that can transmit impulses. Chemicals can come together by gravity, ions, or magnitisum.
animaljp3 4 weeks ago
@superdoobo no animal kills off its one
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Sorry wrong: the wolf spider and the "Human animal" via abortion.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo people kill other people all the time. i meant a wild animal. wolf spider babies eat the mother, but it is programed.
animaljp3 4 weeks ago
creatism has no evidence what so ever. Evolution has all the evidence. God created evolution.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Keep telling yourself that.
superdoobo 1 month ago
@superdoobo evolution is still real
animaljp3 4 weeks ago
@animaljp3 Keep the faith!
superdoobo 4 weeks ago
once again, your evidence is ignorance
animaljp3 1 month ago
man is so arrogant he cannot embrace the fact that he is a primate, thus confirming he is one
Migue261 1 month ago
@Migue261 the fact he looks down at other animals proves he is an animal because it is instinct to do this.
animaljp3 1 month ago
for creationsists I only have two words: common ancestors.
A difference exists between facts and beliefs... and evolution has been proven as a fact. Natural selection and mutation have developed life into a marvelous variety of species (which, by the way, we humans have been destroying or several centuries).
MrDanann 1 month ago
@MrDanann well funny its a fact when its still a theory. You cant have a theory and call it a fact dont work like that so sorry
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 gravity is a theary, not a fact. You NEED EVIDENCE to prove something is wrong.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And you also need evidence to prove it right. So if gravity is a theory then so is evolution its not called the fact of evolution its called the theory of evolution just like gravity anybody that calls evolution a fact is a moron its not its just wishfull thinking and ignorance on your part to call a theory a fact is ascenine might as well call the theory of gravity fact
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 A theory is an unproven idea of something like for me to say your black without proof would be a theory now until i have proof that says you are its a theory something not prove now im not racist im just giving an example. Boy if we can say a theory is a fact then there would be alot of innocent people sent to jail just on what people believe with out real supportive evidence
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 we have a lot of evidence. But yes, like gravity, it is a theory
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And you just contradicted yourself on that one not a very good explanation
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@MrDanann And by the way funny how mutations changed evrything when a mutation happens today its still the same species not a totally different one and dna also shows that it will never let a totally different species happen. And something becoming immune to something is not evolution its a slight variation which dna allows but does not allow a totally different species
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 enough trait difference and you can call a new species.
animaljp3 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrDanann "Evolution has been proven as a fact." please present your findings and collect your Nobel Peace Prize.
superdoobo 1 month ago
through evolutions point of view which is bllshit
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
yes evolution does study how life started if nothing evolved then nothing would live thats why its called the origin of life moron
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
So stop making an ass out of your self and speak truthfully not out of your ass
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
sense
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
To sciencefan1859 no im not blind you are blind and ignorant is that the best you can do you think it hurts my feelings i would rather believe in something that makes the more you read about evolution the more stupid it becomes and to think people actually believe this crap and call it fact when its not any true athiest would tell you that evolution is far from being factual and they would also tell you that there is no transitional fossils that they dont prove shit
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
@cjguitarist100 ever heard of tiktalic, half fish half amphibian. austrethopificus is an ape with an arched foot like a human.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 ya if it wasnt a human foot they put there like all the other skeletons they found
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 the arched foot was the same color and rock as the rest of the fossil how about all of the feathered dinos then?
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And so what if it had an arched foot it means nothing thats like saying because I have the same colored eyes or hair someone else has im related to them no it dont.Just like the retro virus that also means nothing we get the bird flu but does that mean we evolved from birds to nope dont think so and dogs and cats also get the rhino virus does that mean were related nope and apes dogs and cats also get aids but we cant get it from any of them does that mean were related because we
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 only humans have an arched foot.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Ok so why did you say something about an arched foot ape
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And pigs have a hoof just like deer does that mean their related no a pig is actually more closely related to a bear
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 parallel evolution, the fact they have hooves is not link, but different hooves mean they arnt. no other animal has oppisible thumbs like people
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 But your saying because we have simularities with apes we came from them and apes do have opposable thumbs just like us and pigs have the same hooves as all the deer family
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Why dont you watch the video collapse of evolution its right on the right hand side of this page
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 We share simularities nope and why do all the fossils of things that were suppose to have evolved still look the same as they did millions of years ago no evolution there like the horse shoe crab,shrimp,clams,alligators and crocks. And if evolution was true how could the amphibian mate if there were no others they couldnt have evolved at the same time if it takes millions of years to evolve.
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 we have thumbs. we have arms feet many types of teeth warm blood, hair forward faceing eyes. everything evolution can easily make.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 every difference evolution can make.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 only diffrences between ape and human are less hair, upright, arched foot, and bigger brain.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 See just because we have these singularities does not mean we came from them and so we have thumbs dogs have a thumb to the only thing is is its higher up on the leg that means nothing and dogs and cats have forward facing eyes so whats your point
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 we have OPPOSIBALE thumbs. no other animal has that. the rest prove we are mammals
animaljp3 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 there is still evolution in those, just not much. they are well adapted already to change. evolution is traits exaggerated, it is very slow, populations do it.
animaljp3 1 month ago
Allows for we all do it but im not a different species now am I. And the case of the moths is bullshit to it was prooven they changed color because of coal and pollutants just as the trees changed not because of evolution they simply got black because of soot not because they decided to be black morons
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
@cjguitarist100 they were already black and white, the black ones were eaten before, then black trees made it go the other way. Extinction of white means black provalled, thus evolution happened.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 ya end there still is white ones this theory was debunked and it is still in the textbooks typical. And your so called tiktalic was also disproved it was all amphibian. A fish cant crawl up on land only having lungs for water and over a long period of time become something different its impossible take a fish put on land and see what happens. Mostly everthing they say is transitional or the missing link is always proved wrong but yet they keep them in the books. their all fraudulent.
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 FISH BREATHE THROUGH GILLS. they can use swim bladder to breath like LUNGFISH and MUDSKIPPERS. HOW was the moth theory debunked? You saying so? stupid Idiot that was randomly saying stuff? and you never said anything about arched foot ape
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 well idiot evrytime i went fishing and had my catch on a stringer those fish did not survive very long out of water they didnt seem to use their swim bladder and the mud skipper cant survive out of water very long either and no shit fish breath through gills duh yea i never said anything about arched foot apes because most of the so called missing links were all proven fraudulent like neanderthall man and so on and when was the last time you saw a fish crawl out of the water and
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 mud skippers DRY OUT like an AMPHIBIAN!!!! mudskippers, walking catfish, eels, snake heads and lungfish all are fish i have seen on youtube, other internet sites animal planet, discovery. neaderthals have hundreds of fossils. Austrethopificus has arched foot and made footprints.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Live more than a day and become an entirely different species nice try better read up on the fraudulent shit they found moron
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 We can not do that because that would go agianst EVERYTHING evolution is about. Evolution is the best traited organisms surviving, reproducing and with that exaggerating the traits
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And its funny how when it comes to humans that our ancestors mysteriously went extinct but other species ancestors didnt and the fish we supposidly evolved from is still alive today unchanged over millions of years so what fish did we evolve from and why do all amphibians look the same as they did millions of years ago.
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 the first part is extinction, not evolution. Amphibians used to be huge, salamander LIKE creatures. evolution is POPULATION not SPECIES change I already answered that last.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 no it has nothing to do with population evolution is a change from one species to another over time what books have you read
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 it is not SPECIES but population. if a Couger in Canada has a light coat, why would one in Arizona? evolution is only in places where the trait is good
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Your retarded how is extinction first you cant cant have evolution if everything went extinct
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 99 percent of speices are extinct
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Well thats funny beings theres millions of species
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
3 billion years of life, oviously most are gone.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 and how are 99 percent of species extinct when the fossil records show just about everything alive today besides the dinosaours and a few extinct animals
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 SPECIES idiot not Familys
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 What the fuck are you talking about
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 to be smart you need to be weak. the strongest man in world is a strong as a weak chimp
animaljp3 1 month ago
All your evidence against evolution is just you ignorance.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 No it was scientifically proven its not ignorance
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 every evidence is for it. you NEED evidence against to say it does not exist.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Ya you need evidence to prove something right or wrong
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3You cant say a certain person robbed a bank with out evidence. And you also need evidence to prove they didnt do it it works both ways not just one sided
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 And that evidence is fingerprints or they caught them on security tape with their face exposed or someone recognises them. There has to be proof both ways you cant have a theory and call it fact as simple as that
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@animaljp3 And if the theory of gravity has no evidence for it how can it still be theory thats science contradicting itself. A theory is an unproven idea about something with no evidence.You need evidence to prove something fact or fiction so when something cant be proven to be fact or fiction it becomes a theory there for something unproven on both fact or fiction. The theory of evolution does not have evidence to prove its real fact and also has no proof to say its fiction.Thus you get theory
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 In order to call a theory fact you need evidence beyond a doubt to call it fact and if theres so much evidence to call evolution fact then why is it still theory if theres so much evidence to over ride fiction then they should just call it fact but they cant because a theory is lack of evidence to support it on both fact and fiction a theory is not evidence in its self that makes no sense we would have to get rid of theory and say fact if the evidence is already there
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 a theory is UNPROVEN but has EVIDENCE. SCIENCE never has anything without evidence.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 Well then you cant have a theory if theres evidence. Just like you cant say a book is fiction if there evidence its not
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 the Bible was metaphoric in Genesis. Made for people without science and to change there religion, not give them science. evidence is thousands of years written and never goes against itself and makes prophesys in which all the old ones came true.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 many times, the Bible is metaphoric so people at that time could figure it out. it talks about The sun stopping in the sky in a battle, and fruit as good deeds and thoughts.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 hell as being thrown out of a party, and all of Jesus's parables. Revolution has to be metaphoric, if it wasn't every one would believe in God as Satan attacks.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 also, all of the scientific evidence like vestigial parts, missing links like tiktalic and dinos, radio dating, continental drift at 1 inch a year and organisms that could not cross ocean distance MUCH greater that Galapagos. so stop dounting. Here is the evidence. Or are you blind to science and metaphors?
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 artificial selection that made pets and most fruit, plants in Alaska were tropical, and the verity on island species and not AS much on mainland.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 A thought or belief that something happened without evidence to back it up or evidence to disprove it
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 like what? evolution, has dinos, austrethopificus arched foot, vestigial parts, opposible thumbs for us, MAN MADE SELECTION, like all pets and most food. there is NO evidence against
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 dinos have hollow bones, feathers, scaled feet, 4 toes, wrist bones like in wing,
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 No not all dinasours have hollow bones they would not be able to support their heavy weight so thats not true and not all dinasours had feathers either if any that wasnt proved to be an already existing bird and funny how they evolved to birds being they found a fossilized bird just as you would see today 65 million years older than the ones with the feathers now it just went backwards
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 the carnivorous ones had hollow bones, the ones evolved into birds. remember dinos are a family, not small group. 65 million year old birds had teeth. hespornis and icthyornis.
animaljp3 1 month ago
@animaljp3 So those dinasours could not be the decendents of birds already proven
cjguitarist100 1 month ago
@cjguitarist100 thats right, dinos were ancesters of birds. dinos are familys, and SPECIES dont evolve even, POPULATIONS do. thats why there is organisms still around.
animaljp3 1 month ago
And if nothing can be prooven then your theory of evolution is nothing but belief speculation just like jesus christ evolution is not fact and there is no proof otherwise it would not be a theory you speculate that theres proof and it was not observed in nature or in the lab all that happened in the lab was bacteria becoming immune to something thats not evolution its still the same bacteria when are you guys gonna grow up and get over that bogus bullshit its called a slight variation which dna
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
But we dont only in the same gene pool. And god said be fruitfull and make many he did not go into detail as to how
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
well if you want to get on the subject of being imbred we would be imbred to if we evolved because through evolution everything shared a common ancestor of all the living things meaning the ancestor that started everything we would all be related we would all share the same dna
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
Our tail is recorded in our dna because of the sperm cell not because of an ancestor who had one because all animals have this recorded in their dna. In some animals the dna shuts this off and in some animals it doesnt and sometimes that part of the dna does not shut off for humans and allows a full functioning tail which is called a slight variation which dna allows for or you can call it a mutation either way not evolution because were still human
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
So once again this does not prove evolution
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
So because we have a tail bone does not prove evolution we lost it because we no longer needed it as a full fleshed walking upright human we were not ment to have tails. Dogs have them to communicate with each other and to keep balance and reduce drag while running
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
all animals have this some lose it some dont
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
Our dna allows us to loose it because we no longer need it. As a sperm cell we need it to swim to the egg.
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
Yes the reason we have a tail bone is because as a sperm we have a tale but we humans loose it during us being made in the womb. But other animals like lizards and so forth keep their tales
cjguitarist100 2 months ago
and speaking of chance whats the chance of a chicken giving birth to a turtle explain to me
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
Ya we share most of our dna with apes we also share some chromosones with tobacco plants does that mean were related no. And as far as the things we dont need anymore thats rediculous we actually need that so called tail bone every animal has it try and remove it see what happens and the reason we have that is because as a sperm we have tails just as every animal so what you trying to proove thats not evolution the things we have all have reasons for being there in all the animals
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
@cjguitarist100 do our tail bones really grow from a sperms tail?
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa78815 2 months ago
So i suggest you look deeper into it before you open your mouth. Just face it there is no proof
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
@cjguitarist100 "If you were blind, you would not be guilty of ignorance; but now that you claim you can see, your guilt remains."
ScienceFan1859 2 months ago
and the so called fossils such as eosimias mean nothing also they are either apes or humans and dna prooves this there is only los in dna not gains like evolution says. When was the last time you seen a human come from an ape.Or a reptile produce a bird it is genetically impossible if this happened it would be in our dna but reptiles and birds share no similarieties. And some fossils look the same now as they did millions of years ago no evolution there
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
Jus like the so called missing link from reptiles to birds the one bird they found was suppose to be the missing link for reptiles to birds but they also found a fossil of a bird like you would see today 65 million years older than the so called missing link. And it was scientifically prooven that the missing link is 100 percent bird a pirching bird at that not a reptibird but they also keep that in the books as the missing link so fossils mean crap
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
Just like the one fish fossil that was suppose to be the missing link from fish to amphibians i cant remember the name of the fish but it turned out that the so called missing link is still alive today but evolutionists still keep it in the books and in the museums as the missing link when it was prooved its not the missing link
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
Amorphustruth first of all there are no missing links if you actually look further into it you will see that there are none even evolutionists say so and ones that are credited that they are missing links are fabricated by using other bones and making them appear to be the missing link and its not see you guys only hear what the evolutionists want you to hear but they leave out all the other things you should hear
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
Although Charles Darwin came up with the theory of evolution while studying birds from the Galapagos islands, he didn’t tell anyone until he saw a Pikachu evolve into a Raichu. Darwin knew then his theory was super effective.
JDay373 4 months ago
why was it dangerous, because it was based on fantasy from the Hindu religion and lies to set it apart, and now it is brainwashed into the children of the world. If you want to see what I am talking about view my E.C.G playlist on my channel.
1lightinthisworld 6 months ago
@AnonymouslyElected is that a fact ????
hahahah then did god create life ??? ore dont you believe in life
how the hell did life start if evolution didn't do this amazing thing !!!!!!!
sukruoosten 7 months ago