2010 Ford Taurus Limited - Drive Time review

[jvrdlc]

the avalon is quicker 0 to 60, quiter, more refine, but less in tech and style.

[Taurusboy07]

I completely disagree. The Mks design sucks compared to the Taurus. The only thing the Taurus is missing is the vista roof that the lincoln have.

[boywonder0550]

the MKS is sooooooooooo much better

[TheNewMrCool]

I hope you get to review the SHO soon, Steve!

[soulweaponry]

It takes me like 10 minutes to get 0-60 in my kia rio

[BigCarpFoxRiver]

LMFAO at where they put the trunk release button.... what a fail.

[NitroGadvRules]

@BigCarpFoxRiver theres one on the key too.

[TCB1468]

say ECOboost!!

[mercracer24]

What is "echo-boost", is it some sort of sonar propulsion system that I don't know about? Do you mean ECOboost? You don't say echo-friendly, you say eco-friendly; that's why it's Ecoboost

[UTUBEfahim]

car front and interior is awesome....but the rear is really ugly...

[gmman010983]

its nice but the backend is ugly as hell.........and i think while a slow seller the five hundred/taurus looked just fine and in some ways better to me....im also not a fan of that dashboard looks to closed in....

[Ryanfurse]

we had one of these when we went to the united states (were from England) and it was perfect to go to place like disney and seaworld and even bush gardens as we stayed in Kissime and all parks where atleast 15 mins away and in the baking heat we were nice and cool

[drpepper1106]

I'm happy with the power of the Taurus limited. It's powerful enough for normal to aggressive driving, yet still fuel efficient.

[ThousanWhite]

I wish MY car could do 0-60 in 7 seconds.. :(

[quatlen]

I don't like how it looks like it is leaning forward and it is emormous both negatives to me.

[jetts48]

it was just the way it was recorded. i went to the dealership to see one their very nice.

[KneelArmstrong]

7 seconds? Compare that to the old taurus and this thing is fast. The thing it isn't is fuel efficient, needs a smaller more efficient engine and hopefully its reliable.

[ssj4goldengogeta]

27 to 28 mpg on the highway for a 3.5 liter v6 on a car this large is fuel efficient. lol. very. most of the other cars with the same amount of power and fuel economy are smaller.

[NitroGadvRules]

@KneelArmstrong its gets that kind of mileage because its a big car. Stick a smaller engine and you may see even worse mileage. Perfect example of this is the bmw m3, makes 410 hp with a 4.0 liter engine and gets 13/20 mpg. Now the 2011 mustang gt uses a 5.0 liter engine and makes 412 hp. Both make the same kind of power and weigh the same (mustangs a bit heavier) but the larger 5.0 liter engine manages 18/26 mpg . Size of the engine doesn't equal fuel economy.

[steve9509]

Then get tan?