Added: 5 years ago
From: eternal888B
Views: 1,490,725
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,065)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol neutrino's go faster than light.

  • @motormaxis206

    And go back in time

  • @motormaxis206 NO!! They don't! They travel so fast that time stops for them! Read Einstein's Dead Famous

  •  :) Hello in your channel

  • say the sun is a brain sending signals as light carrying entrophy as neurotransmitters,sun is source of light

  • what if when the sun dIsappears the source of its magnetic reconnection after solar maximus causes light on earth to be entangled with light on sun

  • well i think that after the sun disappears, the earth should be getting the sun's light for 8 minutes, but since it's not pulled by gravity(the gravity between earth and the sun goes away just as the sun disappears.) It'll appear that the earth is normal (for the 8 minutes) then we'd be shrouded by complete darkness ;O

  • @bittu0206 I think you need to watch this vid again bro!

  • Einstein was a fucking boss. That is all.

  • enjoying wanking to this

  • this is some interesting shit.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.

  • Thx very much for uploading

  • Comment removed

  • Those who were not astonished, couldn't be the one who have understood the concept. This video shows that upon the implosion of sun its satellite planets will not sink inward. The original orbit will diminish. Earth & his body moon will move ahead as is displayed.

  • This video went viral on Marshall Islands

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!

  • @sandustanBrasov .which god?zeus,the christian god or krishna?

  • • SandustanBrasov

    It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o.These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.

  • • Sand ustanBrasov

    Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.

    

  • SandustanBrasov

    The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.

  • Neutrinos still faster than light in latest version of experiment.

  • why does the moon orbit earth and not the sun if the sun is a bigger object and the moon is the same distance away from the sun as earth?

  • @rapid303 I believe it is because the earths gravity is strong enough to keep the moon from being sucked away and into the sun, just like the suns gravity is holding the earth and all the other planets in orbit around it.

  • @rapid303 because the moon is made from the earth (mostly) and was actually formed from an accretion stage, where small bits collided together when in orbit of the earth, and got bigger and bigger :)

  • lets destroy the sun and find out then

  • Yup Eistein was smarter than me

  • Correct me if i'm wrong but i believe the reason we don't slop towards the sun is because the sun is also orbiting, and so its position and its subsequent bend in space time also moves. If the orbits suddenly stopped or changed direction we would fall into the sun.

  • The strongest force in the universe: strong nuclear force. The problem is is that we don't fully understand what that is.

  • @avogadrois420 dark energy

  • I am not a scientist by anyone's stretch of the imagination. Math is not my forte. I am 49 years old, and have been asking since I was a child, what is gravity. No one can answer my question definitively. I've asserted for many years that "God", the governing force of all that is, is gravity. Understand fully what gravity really is, and you will catch a glimpse of God. It is the glue of the universe. Starting from the smallest a particles we can observe, gravity pulls them together.

  • @kenk714 Gravity is considered the weakest force in the universe among the 4 governing forces though.

  • @kenk714 gravity also does not hold particles together..

  • My question may sound stupid but still why don't the planets just slip to the sun because of the big curve caused by it?

  • @avogadrois420 Gravity is effective on two scales, mass and distance. A gravitational pull becomes weaker as relative distance from the force is extended. A perfect balance of the two is in place when an object become in orbit of another mass. Gravity of a mass bends the fabric of space, and a planet, for example, may fall into this bend. But because of the frictionless environment in space it tirelessly circles this bend rather than rolling into it.

  • @avogadrois420 This video image encourages you to think that the sun is also sinking into a central part of the flat plane, and that near by planets would themselves roll into like marbles. However, the curve in space you see the sun causing in the video is misleading, and is just a simplified example. The video clip shows a dip in space where the sun sits, but in reality this divet in space does not exist on a flat plane, rather it exists all around it, in every direction.

  • @Inqliz  thanx buddy

  • An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).

    I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.

    My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!

  • So according to Einstein, if there is a bend in space influencing the earth, why doesn't the earth eventually fall in to the sun?

  • @windscare21 - The Earth has momentum, so it essentially is "falling" toward the Sun, but this 'falling' is exactly balanced by the movement of the Earth around the Sun.

  • Comment removed

  • @windscare21 because there´s a balance between the earth´s falling away and falling to the sun (centrifugal and centripetal forces) . that's the same principle that keeps satelites in orbit around the earth

  • @eternal888B Thank you so much for sharing this video, I on my part really appreciate it. Wish there were more people like you who helps other people understand something rather than those who are ignorant and constantly nag about everything as you can see down below this comment...so sad

  • i find this easy to masturbate to

  • Comment removed

  • i'm still confused, this is all based on the speed of light being the fastest you can go, but how did Einstein prove it?

  • @dareapa1 Einstein, alas, never said that it was the fastest but the only constant speed in the universe. Which does imply that an object with a mass cannot be faster but still..

  • @dareapa1 he didnt

  • @dareapa1 It never has been proved, it is still a theory. But there are many complicated experiments that suggest this is the case. Too complicated to explain in 350 characters.

  • you spelled presence wrong

  • Comment removed

  • So, cause we cannot find an answer to which there is no question, it gives life meaning..to pursue and progress forward and challenge oursleves to continually questions things to which there are no answers.

    To some things there just isn't an answer... and there shouldn't be a question!!

  • @Nikolesy you dont have the curiosity to be in science.

  • @jennevaa Hi! Thanks for your reply. What is the answer that we are looking for? I think, we are eventually looking for God.. Creation.. where? How did it all begin?? What is the answer to that? No one really knows, and no one will ever know. We are going into realms of science, that as humans stop being scientific, but are there to quash everything that exists.. Humanity.. I love science, and learning new things, knowing the existence of things, how things work, and why..

  • Comment removed

  • @jennevaa However, as scientists, we are just viewed as a bunch of atoms, that have come together in the right combination, in the ideal environment, to think and feel, with inteligence to ask questions, and pursue answers.. This is great, this gives us something to look forward too, and work towards.... So what happens, when we find the answer to the quintesential question?? Do you think we stop there?? Ofcourse we won't.. So ultimately we will always look for answers..

  • @jennevaa What I'm saying is that to some things, there just isn't an answer.. Hence there shouldn't be a question.. Nomatter how many generations, before and after us continue to look, there just won't be an answer.. This is the definitive fact.. In that case, science is void of answering the ultimate question... Myths and theory is what makes things real.. The mystery of God and Creation-how it all began, just is.. Will a scientist ever pinpoint in this mega Universe where it all started??

  • The Ultimate question is, where did matter come from????? WHERE? I've studied a bit in this field, which I gave up a long time ago to find an answer, and I've come to this conclusion.

    All of us is created by an idea, a spark between a male and female and hence creating a baby, which grows and evolves, to think and question.

  • But what about the neutrino they recently sent through SERN that traveled faster than the speed of light?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Actually Einstein did not discover that the speed of light is the same for all observers. It had been discovered by several experimenters. Einstein took it as the basis of his theory.

  • so what calculator did you use to record this audio?

  • Comment removed

  • 2. "...and which is taken in passing to and returning from the region diametrically opposite the pole over the earth’s surface with a mean velocity of about four hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and forty kilometers per second.”

     (ART OF TRANSMITTING ELECTRICAL ENERGY THROUGH THE NATURAL MEDIUMS, Nikola Tesla, USA Patent No. 787,412. Application May 16, 1900, patented April 18, 1905.)

  • 1. “The most essential requirement is, however, that irrespective of frequency the wave or wave-train should continue for a certain interval of time, which I have estimated to be not less then one-twelfth or probably 0.08484 of a second... 

  • this aint no whistling contest.

  • And another fact which proves that this result is probably false is the explosion of a supernovae 50 years ago (if i remember well). If neutrino do travel as fast as they calculated, we should have seen them 2 years before light, but we didn't... we saw them 2 hours later...

  • Really, do people here believe neutrinos goes faster than the speed of light?

    I don't think so, and my teachers neither (i'm studying physics at university). One of them told us that they probably forgot to add a correction due to the high level difference and that time passes differently (thanks to einstein theory of general relativity).

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • But you see the world as you know it is an third dimension and there is an angle we have not found witch is an angle that rip's Enstine's theory of relativity he thought the world was on an invisible sheet witch that sheet is gravity but in my research it is an fourth dimension and a black hole is an or the angle that enables us to see the fourth dimension thus allowing human's to briefly see gravity as we know it the "Fabric" of Enstine's theory is a mystery I will explain, Aubrey Robinson

  • Relatively speaking Relativity is not so relative isn't that special as neutrinos travel faster than light. the constant has changed...oopps

  • @starview1 actually the latest discoverings of neutrinoes exceeding v=c prooves that validity of a RELATIVELY new theory, caled string theory. the common opinion is that neutrinoes, because of their small mass, pass through other dimensions on their way during a high-energy path.

  • sorry...ime not convinced.no experiment=no proof.

  • Comment removed

  • @LeconsdAnalyse huum you're wrong, it's because einstein thought that the speed of light is the same in every inertial referetiel that the gamma factor's like that. He didn't find gamma and then thought hoo look that, nothing can go faster than light.

  • Comment removed

  • ime no scientist so please can anyone explain to me this...exactly which experiment did einstien perform to prove conclusivley that the speed of light is the speed limit of the universe?

  • Comment removed

  • @ddandyy science doesnt always need experiments to prove something, as long as no experiments can prove it wrong, a theory will remain "correct" until further theory/experiments prove otherwise.

    Einstein proves that an object is to be accelerated to speed of light it will require infinite amount of energy, something related to the equation e=mc^2. You can probably search for information about that.

    But then of course until someone smart enough to prove otherwise, Einstein will remain correct.

  • @ddandyy

    ok listen.

    KE=kinetic energy

    m=mass(kilograms)

    v=velocity(meters/second)

    c=300,000,000

    KE=1/2mv^2; so the faster you move, the more energy you have. and if you have more energy you have more mass(energy is directly proportional to mass; E=mc^2). But, the more mass you have, the more energy you need to speed up. Therefore you would need an infinite amount of energy to be able to have an object with mass to move at a speed of c. Light, is a photon with no mass, so it can travel at c.

  • @lLunesta but the speed of light isnt an infinite speed,its just very fast.so why the need for infinite mass?my head hurts...

  • so if the wave is going the speed of light then therefore we would stay with the light from the pre-existing sun and it wouldnt be dark on earth??

  • @Palmerater That would only be true if the Earth were also traveling at the speed of light. Since the Earth is going much, much slower in it's orbit, if the sun were to "disappear," releasing it from it's orbit, the last ray of light would eventually pass the Earth and leave us in darkness. Think of it as two cars on a freeway, even though one is going very fast (Earth) it will eventually get passed by a car going the speed of light.

  • Hang on...gravity acts from the centre of an object i.e the sun does it not? Though this does not seem to fit with the whole "fabric" idea. If the effects of gravity are simply caused by the mass of the sun causing a curve in the fabric, and the earth is in orbit as a result of that curve, that suggests that there is some gravitational pull from underneath the fabric, not from the centre of the sun. I'm sure I haven't just found a gaping hole in Einstein's theory, but can someone please explain?

  • @Wellsypig15 I'm not sure (this relativity theory is still hard for me to comprehend), but 1 thing i know is that universe is not 2 dimensional as a sheet of some fabric. this model makes it easier to understand the curves in time-space, but trying to replicate 3D object in 2D is inaccurate, so you shouldn't connect every aspect of theory to the model of heavy objects curving this flat sheet, not sure if i made any sense though.

  • Comment removed

  • Fabric of space time............ I hardly understood it when animated in 3d movie how the hell this freak imagined it!!!!!!!!!

  • the elegant universe changed my view on space

  • if light was fastest thing and nothing can go faster than light and if time isnt light (some have theories light is time) time then time goes slower than light therefore i see things in the future.

  • E=mc^2? Not anymore! At least what CERN says. They discovered that the neutrino has gone indeed faster than light!

  • Comment removed

  • @LeconsdAnalyse You want to interpret phisics? You're not serious, are you? Wether it was an anomaly or not is irrelevant, because for any object with mass, including the neutrino to achieve light speed it need unlimited energy, which hillbilly terms means not achievable - according to einstein, regardless of it being an anomaly or not.

  • Comment removed

  • @LeconsdAnalyse hehehe german got owned :)

  • Wow, please upload some more videos which you just fucking recorded from a screen!

  • @whiterottenrabbit As the content of this video is educational and rare in the way it explains relativity easy to understand for most i would say that the source from which it was recorded does not matter. Especially for me and i imagine allot of other people who learned about relativity in less then 8 minutes after watching this short educational video.

    Content is all that matters. Not the source from which it is recorded.

  • @xchosen0nex Well, I accept your opinion. But I can still be pissed off by half-assed inferior quality YouTube videos, right?

  • @whiterottenrabbit As long as you have perspective on the subject it's no problem!

    Small suggestion would be to show that in your comments. Be pissed of where due, but also give credit where due.

  • @xchosen0nex So, are you saying that people should only comment on the content of a YouTube video and not on the quality of this video?

  • @whiterottenrabbit No. It's ok to comment about the quality of video.

    But in all fairness the content itself is good and educational and should be given credit.

    If you construct your comments in such a manner they are allot more helpful to readers and the OP.

    eg. Your comment could have said: The quailty of your video SUCKS! But thank you for the educational video.

  • @xchosen0nex

    Hmm... That was a surprisingly calm and reasonable response, dude! Well, you're right, I should have given credit to the content. Peace out! xD

  • @whiterottenrabbit I hear you. The outcome of this discussion is surprising to say the least. Considering it's Youtube! Anyway, it was a pleasure. Peace :-)

  • einstein is great,cool ausumn.but he is little madeto.

  • There are 2 things we have mayor problems with; 1 what happens when we died with ourselves & 2 going faster as light.

    Now you all can call me an idiot, but,

    I connect these 2 things together, so.

    If Im right it would meen that, we will go faster as light, after we have died...

    I dont believe that we get any closer to a answer as this one, NEVER EVER!!!

    Cause we probably allready died once, & we still aint see it!!!

    --conclusion we'll SEE IT, but wont be AWARE OF IT!!!!!!!!--

  • Comment removed

  • I believe, that all these brilliant explanations still only cover the effect of gravity, but not its cause. The cause is still explained by mass effects. And WHY that is, is still a mysterium. Isn't it?

    Also, that a change of gravity always comes in waves... I am not convinced, that the waves of gravity variation are the cause of gravity. Of course, the information of gravity change cannot travel faster than at light speed. But gravity itself?

    I am absolutely not convinced by all that

  • "The speed of gravitational waves in the general theory of relativity is equal to the speed of light in vacuum" (Hartle, JB (2003). Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity. Addison-Wesley. p. 332. ISBN 9810227493) => also, there's nothing between Sun and Earth (it's vacuum) => So, sudden destruction of Sun will have instantaneous effect on the earth!!!!!! ( => Gravity travels with the speed of light )

  • @kittleboy how do you explain the eight minutes for the wave to reach earth, if you say the effect on earth is instantaneous.

  • @kittleboy gravity travels with the speed of light which is approximately 300.000 kilometeres per secundum in a vacuum. so it takes about 8 minutes for any wave (light of gravitation) to travel from the Sun to the Earth. so the effect is not instantaneous.

  • * because the average distance between sun and earth is 150million km.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @thecomanche1 you're not making any sense, "existence to non existence at the speed of light maximum?" meaning e=mc2"?????

  • Comment removed

  • So does this mean gravity travels the same speed as light?

  • @Ethioness yes.

  • Checkout "The Gravitational Force of the Sun" by Dr. Pari Spolter which proves that Newton & Einstein were frauds & the entire subject of non-quantum physics is one of the biggest follies in human history on a par with the Inquisition.

    Also, checkout "What if Einstein was wrong?" an interview with Dr. Spolter on YouTube (by ItsRainMakingTime).

    For a detailed summary, google John Lear's web page "Challenging Einstein".