blah blah blah. i've already explained donkey years ago why size do matter. Since you insist on being right, there's no way i can talk u out wendy.
mind you. I'm no Pro-PAP. I have questions for them, but I just think SDP hasn't the capabilities or even, knowledge to change this country. You and Chee are the same, disrespect people, and expect them to support you.
People by the likes of you are the scums who should leave the country. It was a wise decision for Mr Chiam to leave SDP.
Agares, size does NOT matter, when it comes to democracy, freedom of speech and assembly etc. Every "size" deserves such basic human rights, unless you think smaller "size" deserves to be deprived of such rights and be bullied! In fact, the smaller the size, the more vulnerable, the greater the danger of doing a 1-man show hastily, and the more we need the collective wisdom of everyone deliberating back and forth first before acting.
You are the one disrespecting people - thinking that citizens have no wisdom and hence should all shut up (no rights to freedom of speech and assembly) and we all stupid fools should all just listen to the wisdom of one old man.
Scums like you - disrespect citizens, support leegally-corrupted regime (and then claim not pro-pap) - should leave the country, and indeed will be chased out of the country the way minions of Marcos are chased out of Philippines.
You are quick to declare you are no pro-PAP. Yet, despite my several protest that I am not from SDP, you stubbornly insist on linking me to Chee and SDP, as if my action somehow (by your warp logic) reflects on Chee/SDP! This tactic clearly expose you as having a hidden unspeakable agenda.
SDP scums are cowards who insult the government, but fear the consequences.
2006 NKF Incident -
The PAP had demanded apology from SDP and affiliated parties for defamation. SDP announced ahead of time they would not be apologising. However, currently all members of the SDP and the printer have apologised except Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin
How supportive are the SDP members. lol SDP has only 2 members in fact, a family business by Chee Soon Juan and Siok Chin.
PAP scums are cowards, who have to resort to bullying and under-handed means eg defamation suits, police arrest, GRCs, ever-changing electoral boundaries and other unconstitutional means to stay in power. Cowards who dare not compete in a gentlemanly fair election!
Many SDP members caved in eventually, for the sake of their families. They are to be respected for daring to stand up for so long. Chee and his sister did not cave in at all. They are to be even more respected.
(cont) These r common sense and any upright person would view it thus. But alas, not for PAP ball-carriers, who are out to smear oppositions (esp those who advocate an overhaul of the system and thus is a real threat to PAP).
AGARES, is the money really that good? Twisting falsehood to become "truth" and vice versa to ensure your dictatorial political master stay in power forever via unconstitutional means, is really a low way to make a living. Do you not have some self-respect? Zzzz
That's because I cannot bear the thought of my readers puking over your nonsensical illogical ball-carrying comments without reading my rebuttal there side-by-side.
And I do not have the time to entertain your nonsense everyday, so comments shall be pending till I find that time to rebut you. That's not against free speech, you ball-carrier!
You are currently comparing a small country with 4.8 million population to a big continent of 21 million. Australia is more than 1000 times bigger than us, but only 4 times more population.
I hope you didn't think that employment here is easy. Considering the number of jobs available here and there, it's not easy for us to pay the citizens the same amount as the Australians.
So what do you have to say to this statement Miss/Mrs/Mdm Wendy Neo?
Aust size and poln are irrelevant fact. Sg should have a min wage system. Given wages that are sufficient to raise a family, singaporeans would be willing to work as construction workers etc.
I wonder what you, ball-carrier Agares, has to say to this statement, which is expounded more here:
youtube com/watch?v=JLScKREOpMU&fmt=18
I am "Miss Neo". If you had wanted to know if I have a bf or am married, you could have ask directly. Thank you.
Oh by the way, I believe you have nothing to do with SDP. Who wants to be affiliated with an uncivilised party?
I don't have to rebutt any of your statements against PAP, because I don't have to stoop low to respond to those insults. I was here to remind you some courtesy towards the constitution. Why would I want to hear from a vulgar person who insults the current government more than to provide constructive information to improve the issues?
Yes, YOU agares, should show some respect for The Constitution, which allows for peaceful assembly.
SDP, in disobeying illegal laws that violates The Constitution, is not being uncivilised; it is showing the highest respect for the highest law of the land - The Constitution.
Consturctive info to improve the issues are abundant in my videos eg:
Less than S$600 a month, and getting lesser every year, due to influx of foreign workers. In australia, lower-end jobs are reserved for citizens so that lowly educated citizens can earn enough to support their families. All developed countries do that - protect vulnerable citizens.
PAP practices elitism. If you are not in the gifted stream, then sorry hor, you die is your own business. In fact, sg is not a country but a company and our leaders are not employers:
Wendy, I think you've gotta know this. You are very disrespectful towards the PAP. Regardless of their governance, there are still people who believe in their abilities. If you are to call their supporters names, or people who are brainwashed, then you should come with a reason why we should support your barbaric propaganda.
SDP had supporters, nobody posted anything to defame the party. Do something to convince the people, not defame the government.
Agares, there is absolutely nothing wrong to be disrespectful towards PAP - a party that LEEgalised corruption, that sold Singapore to foreigners, and that lost billions of our hard-earned money, not to mention a dictatorship.
There is however something very wrong to reject the above reasons (and to instead insist like a mad running dog that I had not "come [up] with a reason"), and to be respectful of such a dictatorial PAP.
It is wrong because it shows that you are willing to sell your soul to the devil for the sake of money and power. I suggest you quit being a running dog, for your parents' sake.
Note: You have been very rude to me FIRST on my other video web page where you made personal attacks and name-callings against me without provocation, so I am entitled to retaliate BACK here by calling you a running dog. Tit for tat for something that YOU started first :)
1stly, SDP is SDP's business, not my business; I am not from SDP. 2ndly, I have done enough video that can convince any reasonable citizen. Dogs however are not convince-able, since they can gain money and power from PAP. Finally, it is not defamation when it is the truth. While LKY like to anyhow use defamation suits on his opponents, he is LKY! Who are you? Your copycat-like use of "defamation" is laughable. You are not fit to use that word on your master's behalf. lol
Many of my videos show facts. One of them is even a serious Q & A:
youtube com/watch?v=FwCVd_PE4mE
A few, such as this video, illustrate my *understandable* anger at a LEEgally corrupted regime which insist on letting 80 years old citizens clear plates, while pocketing salaries higher than the COMBINED salary of G8 nation leaders! (Yet another 2 reasons to rebut your nonsense that I have not come up with "a reason").
I have never done that. I reserve the phrase "running dog" or other derogatory terms ONLY as a RETALIATION against those who make vulgar/personal attack against me FIRST, WITHOUT PROVOCATION
Egs would be those who FOR NO REASON, INITIATE calling me "bitch", "scum" etc. Or insult me: "an attn-seeking whore who needs her pussy..." etc
Under such circumstances, my use of "dog" is not only a justified retaliation, but may well hold a lot of truth! lol
Lol why get so worked up with PAP and my comments? Personally you've seen a lot of its supporters and they are comfortable with the government. Yes people leave SG for good, but what can you assure us with?
Did you think freedom of speech and to everything would bring us to what we are at world's level today? You wouldn't want us to be like the Thais and Indonesians do you? Killings in riots and strikes.
Make the citizens believe in you and SDP before you try to badmouth PAP here.
They are not. They do not get to vote because oppositions candidates dare not stand up for elections due to PAP's defamation suits, GRC, ever-changing electoral boundaries etc. If PAP is so sure that it has lots of supporters, why does it not dare to scrape GRC etc.
And don't for a moment tell me GRC is for minority candidate. JBJ, as a minority, was elected twice without GRC. And so did David Marshall.
I am not a politician. I do not need to assure you or any Singaporean of anything! *amused*
However, common sense should assure you that having check and balance and democracy is critical to any country's survival and SG - in spite of its small size, lack of natural resource (and all other irrelevant truth thrown in by pap supporters) - is no exception!
It is check & balance that allowed the Americans to throw out Bush (after his limited 2 terms of office).
> Did you think freedom of speech and to everything would bring us to what we are at world's level today?
Don't give me the "freedom.. to everything" nonsense! You are not a 3 yr old and neither am I. So, you know very well nobody is asking for extreme freedom to everything eg to murder, to rape etc. Stop treating me/readers as if we are idiots. It only reflects on yousrelf - that you are idiotic enough to think we are idiots.
> Did you think freedom of speech.. would bring us to what we are at world's level today?
Yes! Indeed, if not for the existence of *some* (limited) form of freedom of speech within PAP pre-1990, where LKY's peers eg Ong Pang Boon, Toh Chin Chye, Ong Teng Cheong etc are around to moderate his extremism, Sg would not be at its 1990 level.
Post-1990, LKY runs a 1-man show with zero free speech and all his eugenics elitism come out in the form of FTrash import, zero welfare, bringing down sg
> like the Thais and Indonesians.. Killings in riots and strikes.
Why instill unfounded fear by making IRRELEVANT comparison with undemoncratic countries? I question your motive
Singaporeans aspire to be successful democracies like UK, USA, Canada, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Japan. And we are justfied to make such "demands", given that Lee's salary > these 8 countries COMBINED.
Sg is below G8:
youtube com/watch?v=FwCVd_PE4mE
thus, Lee is not fit to receive his LEEgally corrupted salary.
> Make the citizens believe in you and SDP before you try to badmouth PAP here.
One, I have already told you I have nothing to do with SDP. You can't read?
Two, it is not badmouth when it is the truth. I note with pleasure that you are not able to rebut any of my criticism of PAP (which I backed up with evidence and fact). All you are able to do is to keep regurgitating that I am "badmouthing" them. lol
Three, it is the job and duty of every citizen (and opposition party) to point out the fault of the government. Every patriot should and must do that, for the sake of the country. Your strange idea that as a citizen, I am not allowed to criticise the govt (with all my valid evidence somemore), and that I am only allowed to first get citizens to "believe" in me (how? Like in a cult?), is weird and detrimental to a country's future! Sg needs check/balance and valid criticism is gd for sg!
Perfect. You ain't any politician, and you don't intend to assure us anything. So what are you doing here with your darn videos? Trying to show the people how influential you can be by opposing the government?
You ain't a 3 year-old - I'm really trying to believe that. You commented so much on 1 of my comments, how much information were relevent?
If you truly want to preach the people into your propaganda, act on it and show us something.
My videos are an expression of my beliefs. In countries which allow freedom of speech, this is common and no one would think of questioning it. Your underlying msg that since I am not a politician, I am not allowed to make these videos, is a proof of what a ball-carrier you are!
All 100% of the info I gave to rebut your nonsense are relevant.
I am in Aust. How to show action? Yes, anyone is capable of talking. But only some are good ball-carriers. You are lousy at carrying balls. lol
lol. besides calling people ball-carriers and insulting our government, what have you done? You had nothing to rebutt me Wendy, you reply by calling my statements irrelevant and then start saying how a suck-up I am to the PAP. Come on narrow-mind. Don't call people names just because they support the PAP, and gloat when people think similarly like you.
You are in Aust, good. Though I don't really believe you, but don't meddle with politics when you ain't even in the country.
Indeed your statements r irrelevant: aust size vs sg's is irrelevant to min wage argument. That's my rebuttal.
That u r not interested in proper debate (eg. you are unable to rebut me why country's size matters), but keep coming to my channel to make personal attacks (latest being abt me not being in sg), is an indication that you are indeed part of PAP INTERNET BRIGADE.
I am fully justified to RESPOND to the personal attacks INITIATED by you, by calling you a running dog in RETURN!
Curiously (and this is based on anecdotal rather than hard-statistical evidence) I see more Singaporeans wanting to leave Singapore permanently than, say, Hong Kongers or Taiwanese. Second question: If Singapore is better off than these two places ie. HK and/or Taiwan then why are people so keen to leave Singapore permanently?
My questions are genuine and I do not mean to offend or insult anyone here. I'd love to live in Singapore, HK or Taiwan. If only I could afford it....
The hard stats is that Singapore has the world's 2nd highest emigration rate, after east timor!
A2: Singapore is much worse than HK and Taiwan. For one, they have democracy (though not full-fledged or in its mature form) and free speech and free media. For another, they have better welfare than sg, has min wage system while sg has none, has lower GINI coefficient etc.
You would love to live in sg, if you are here only to make money. Sg has low tax rate.
But if you treat it as your homeland/country and you are caring enough to be concerned for your lesser-off citizens and patriotic enough to bother abt the long term future of the undemocratic country with no check and balance, you would be in living hell.
I'm from Australia and am impressed at the loyalty and gratitude Singaporeans seem to have for Mr Lee. Many people clearly love the old fella and seem happy that he draws his SG$1million dollar pension (does anyone know if this pension exceeds that of other former world leaders?)
Q1. Can anyone name any post-war non-communist economy with a large Chinese population that has NOT succeeded?
His pension is way beyond 1 million. It's 2/3 of his salary and his salary is now past 3 million! He has been receiving BOTH a pension and a salary, since he was 55 years old i.e. double salary for past 30 years.
A1: Singapore. Beneath the seemingly successful exterior, sg has failed. The media hides it, but the failure is slowly starting to surface.
What you should be impressed is how the 154th-ranked govt-controlled newspaper has managed to brain-washed everyone.
And you should be impressed with LKY's political gift too - not many politicians can hold elections and still manage to come up with so many successful tricks (such as changing electoral boundary every election, Grouped constituencies, defamation suits etc) to win every election!
Then again, what is so impressive? Dictators all over the world have won "free" elections! lol
Well Wendyneo, so you do agree that Mr Lee did "delivered the goods", so to speak ? Never mind your ego, but the fact remains that he has put Spore in the state it is today. "Ups" and "Downs" are inevitable in life, politics no exception. You are bent to focus on the latter. These exchanges can roller-coaster forever. Lets put it aside. Let's say Mr Lee was lucky. Luck plays an impotant part in life. In your endevour to be known as an absolute PAP opposer, I wish you plenty of LUCK !!!
No, that's not what I said. I said he *may* have delivered *some* goods. The word "may" is impt because strictly speaking it was not lky, but people like Toh Chin Chye, Ong Pang Boon etc who delivered while keeping LKY's etremism in check. And the evidence is in what happened post-1990 when LKY runs a 1-man show.
"some" is also an impt word because the damage that LKY did outweighs the delivery, similar to the overall assessment of other dictators such as Mao etc - FAIL!
We should put aside LKY's personal "luck" (actually, more of cruelty. If Lim Chin Siong has the cruelty to betray his comrade the way LKY did, destiny would have changed. Nothing to do with luck.)
Let's talk about Singapore's "luck" instead. Do you think we should let our beloved Sg's future be dictated by luck? By whether Chee is luckier or Lee is luckier? Don't you wish for a 2-party, check-and-balance situation where sg's future is assured, and not dependent on luck?
Btw, in democratic country, I would not need "luck". I won't kena ISD if I am "unlucky". I won't be sued if I am "unlucky". I would be able to stand up for my country without fear of running out of "luck"! And the best person will be able to lead SG, even if he is not as "lucky" (cruel to opponents?) as LKY, or even if he is not lucky enough to be LKY's son!
Surely, that's much better for sg. No?
When you need to wish me "luck", it's already an indication of how sad a place sg is!
Nice place, friendly people makes you feel welcomed. Lets hope the place won't get too conjested with undesirable imports. Yes Wendyneo, you're not totally wrong to say Mr Lim Chin Siong or anyone else for that matter could have make Spore
a better place to live in. But "would
haves" & "could haves" are cheap excuses commonly used in arguments. Mr Lee delivered the goods. And therefore he deserves the respect. You will NEVER want to agree with this.
seapss, Lee *may* have delivered *some* goods in the past. But, post-1990, sg is doing down the drain. That's because absolute power corrupts absolutely, and with no peers to moderate his extremism, sg suffers! This is like Mao Ze Dong who chased out the foreigners, but did great damage during cultural revolution. And so on, with all dictators.
Thus, check and balance and democracy and free speech/media etc to prevent absolute power are very impt. I am glad some oppo party is working for that.
actually, "would have", "could have" are not cheap excuses, if they are backed by serious studies and intelligent deduction. For eg. LIM was a socialist who cared a lot for the poor, sick, elderly etc. LEE is an ultra-right capitalist who cares only abt making money. It is not mere speculation to say that the poor, sick etc would be better off under LIM. See my Lim's video, where I talk a bit abt that.
Hey KingKenTut, you're now 39 years old. It means your parents were also in the Lee Kuan Yew era when he struggled to make Spore what it is today !! Ask you dad first before you post such ridiculous comments. Without Mr Lee you will now be wondering when is your next meal will come instead of wondering how much Mr Lee is going to die !!. You are igorant and are of an ungrateful breed !! You should cherish your great leader !! Go and overhaul that " curd" between your ears !!
seapss, Lee Con You did NOT struggle in any way, to make sg what it is today! Instead, he "fixed" his more popular comrade, Mr. LIM CHIN SIONG, so as to unlawfully gain political power. (Go watch my LCS video).
Sg is what it is today due to hardworking S'poreans and LKY's PAP peers such as TOH CHIN CHYE and ONG PANG BOON and ONG TENG CHEONG etc, who were there to moderate LKY's extremism. Post-1990, when LKY runs a 1-man show in pap, his extremism (e.g. extreme FT import) is ruining sg.
"cherish your great leader"? Wiow, your choice of words is no diff from N. Korea and China during the cultural revolution, where leaders are worshiped. Are you a slave living under an Emperor?
LKY/PAP are our civil SERVANTS i.e. maids! Do you ever tell your family to "cherish our great leader" when talking about your MAID? Stop being a slave. We are employers of the country and pap is our employee. Go and overhaul that slavish mentality in your head!
seapss, you're now 58 yrs old. This means you were in the era where Lee Con You betrayed LIM CHIN SIONG, and make Spore what it is today - an ultra-right company with zero-welfare and a playground for the super-rich.
Without Lee, all S'poreans - including the sick, poor and elderly - would be well-taken care of by socialist-at-heart LIM CHIN SIONG. Go watch my video on him.
Being 58, you are not ignorant of these. Thus, can I conclude that u r pretending to be ignorant to carry balls? :)
2ndly, lky's ELITISM - e.g. grad mother scheme and its current continuation in the disguised form of high tax rebates to high-paying career women while denying PR to non-grad foreign wives of non-grad singaporeans, etc - and EXTREMISM - eg. extreme import of foriengers etc - are destroying our beloved Singapore.
Do you love Singapore or do you love PAP. If you love Singapore, start wondering when LKY will die!
But to tell you the truth, I actually *worry* - rather than wonder - about lky's death. He has not instituted a check-and-balance 2-party system. His ministers are selfish money-face who threatened to quit governing singapore unless we raise their salaries by 1 million each by year end! His son is a clown; who puts on a clown hat:
youtube com/watch?v=JQSAefPb6Yo
and talks like a clown:
youtube com/watch?v=Q4_P6q6CfsQ
LKY's death may bring chaos due to these. I am worried. Very worried.
There is such a thing called legalised corruption. High pay high bonus for CEO, MP and Ministers in their renumeration package irregardless of their zero contribution.
Hi Wendy, Just knew that you have migrated to Australia! My loving place because I like fishing. A very peaceful and relaxing place if we have enough Vitamin 'M'. Do you agree? Not bad, You understand the meaning of Dak Boleh Tahang! Wishes you have a great success in life and make it big in the future. I beleive you are a Teochew lady! Teochew are very very good in business. This is in born in them and I also dont know why. Most of my big bizman friend are Teochew. Gd Luck! Cheers!
Hi Wendy, Durai is due to the management team internal weakness to allows him to draw high pay. JBJ indeed make mistake by not carefully talk without a solidified proofs against his opponent even what he said is truth. In any country, facts and figures is the only way to topple or judge a person and not just by empty talking. Our government can legalised their huge earnings is their strength and we can not prove them wrong doing is our opposition weakness! Nice having a wonderful debate with you
>"Durai is due to the management team internal weakness to allows him to draw high pay."
Same as PAP. If Ong Pang Boon, Toh Chin Chye etc are ard, maybe lky cannot implement such legalised corruption too. There were gd pple in pap in the past - some of his peers.
>"JBJ indeed make mistake by not carefully talk"
careful also no use. Chinese say: 欲加之罪,何患无辞。Wolf wants to eat sheep, any excuse also can - Aesop fable :)
Hi lovely Wendy, very glad to have you to be part of Singapore who concern about Singapore issue which most ladies normally dont bother! I totally agreed with you that they have legalised the earning. Nobody can topple PAP except the nation. Do you agrees? Be fare to PAP that they have took alots but they have done their parts also. May be they are not up to your expectation but they are not too bad either, right? Hope one fine day for those who are not good for Singapore should topple! Cheer
Hi Wendy Neo, officially above board, our government is drawing the highest salary in the world but dont forget the rest of the government might have drawn 10 times higher than our government under table. I hope we Singaporean should use apple to apple comparision rather than having our personal emotional feels. Jo Leng
other govt may draw 10 0times more, but 1. it's legitimate money from private org eg Clinton wrote books, or 2. they can be brought to justice one day for corruption. Ours cannot, because our govt legalised corruption. Eg. Durai cannot be punished for his legally corrupted salary. So, apple to apple, no other govt has legalised corruption the way our govt did!
Hi Wendy Neo, whole of Singapore knows PAP always use defamation laws suit, jail and bankruptcy as a weapon! A smart and capable tactical opposition shouldnt fall into this trap again and again therefore I still believe temporary PAP is still the best leaders for Singapore. I am not brainwashed by PAP and I knows alot about Singapore happenings. We Singaporean are not blindfolded and PAP can not fool whole of Singapore. May be one day they might topple if they dont perform. Who knows?Jo Leng
Depend on how you think lor. diff pple diff idea. WP works within the system. But i think even if WP get another 10 members into parliament oso no use. PAP can sue, jail, bankrupt all of them, and kick them out of Parliament the way it did to JBJ. SDP's way is to insist on full constitutional rights and raise awareness of injustice done by pap. If enough pple are indignant, the people will not allow pap to anyhow sue, jail, bankrupt. That's solving problem at the root. no?
ferrouschloride, u know of all the injustice, but u still say lky is your idol! this is dangerous because u probably r thinking: "nevermind, i dont go into politics. The jail, defamation, bankruptcy dont apply to me." But one day, when it finally affects u, it will be too late! Eg 1 Wat if u get arrested wrongly, and no free media to help expose/rescue you? Eg 2. the Sim family din expect controlled media (which can cover up wrongdoings) to affect them but it did!
Hi, Mr Lee Kuan Yew is my idiol and PAP is not the best in Singapore but till now I have not seen any party yet as good as them! Singapore is a small country and we should not have too much of free speeches because it will create unneccesary problems to our country. If one day PAP did not do their part or did not honour what they suppose to delivery, I strongly believe the only party to topple them is themself! Faithful Singaporean.
These are my videos. What do you call a comment written by the video owner on her own video page? Spam? Only pap internet brigade doggies will mark my comments on my own video page as spam.
One of the many ways Singapore's People's Action Party (PAP) govt censor free speech & manages online dissidents - It gets its "PAP INTERNET BRIGADE" running dogs to mark dissenting youtube comments as spam!
Browse through my video "SHINE FOR SINGAPORE"'s comment pages: You will find 8 comments labeled as "spam" - all r my own comments on my own video! This is no accident. 2 more comments on my "Bishan" videos r censored too.
One of the many ways Singapore's People's Action Party (PAP) govt censor free speech & manages online dissidents - It gets its "PAP INTERNET BRIGADE" running dogs to mark dissenting youtube comments as spam!
Browse through my video "SHINE FOR SINGAPORE"'s comment pages: You will find 4 comments labeled as "spam" - all r my own comments on my own video! This is no accident. 2 more comments on my "Bishan" videos r censored too.
Lim Chin Siong and many others especially Chia Thye Poh who was detained without trial for 32 empty years as he does not wish to be forced to sign a statement of making him a 'communist'. These are great patriots.
When an opposition member's brother dies in a tragic murder, he is demonised and character assassinated together with ALL non-PAP party members.
When a PAP politician dies, the citizens are spoon-fed propaganda by the state controlled media that is Channel News Asia, Straits Times, The New Paper, Mediacorp.
may they all burn in hell
bamboocharcoal 3 years ago
PAP百世留个臭名!!!
hotshibuya 3 years ago
老兄,目前你在美国也看到所谓的民主和自由市场,给谁搞垮了,骗子出在那一国?
一个小岛一無所有,就算不是十全十美,能有今天的成绩,已经不错了,大家安居乐业,只要肯干,新加坡是不会令你失望的.
yunomiok 2 years ago 2
美国,正因为有民主,所以人民有能力,把他们认为是祸国殃民的总统给踢出去,把他们认为是可以拯救国家的总统给选出来。每天全世界的人民,都可以读到美国领导人所犯的错误。
新加坡因为没有民主,所以有个老不死的,把国家搞跨了,还可以一手遮天,把错误掩盖起来,不必下台。请问,骗子出在哪一国?
wendyneo 2 years ago
如今是2009年了。看清楚:2009年!李老不死早已把贪污合法化,早已拿着比八大工业国**加起来**还要高的薪水,却要新加坡人过着比八大工业国糟糕得多的生活 - 他要你工作到老死,并在你老到不能工作时,把你驱逐出境到柔佛等死。何来的安居乐业?你根本是在睁眼说瞎话,信口胡言。
而你却居然还在缅怀40年前,1965年时的"一无所有"!你是活在古代?
wendyneo 2 years ago
新加坡不会令我失望,但李老不死把贪污合法化的行径,令我愤怒! 你这种老是活在过去的新加坡人,更是令我失望:
watch?v=oP-GLEbShAM
watch?v=ClTraXRewj8
又:民主和自由市场是两个完全不同的东西。你拿后者来诬蔑前者,真是风马牛不相及!
wendyneo 2 years ago
blah blah blah. i've already explained donkey years ago why size do matter. Since you insist on being right, there's no way i can talk u out wendy.
mind you. I'm no Pro-PAP. I have questions for them, but I just think SDP hasn't the capabilities or even, knowledge to change this country. You and Chee are the same, disrespect people, and expect them to support you.
People by the likes of you are the scums who should leave the country. It was a wise decision for Mr Chiam to leave SDP.
Agares 3 years ago 2
Agares, size does NOT matter, when it comes to democracy, freedom of speech and assembly etc. Every "size" deserves such basic human rights, unless you think smaller "size" deserves to be deprived of such rights and be bullied! In fact, the smaller the size, the more vulnerable, the greater the danger of doing a 1-man show hastily, and the more we need the collective wisdom of everyone deliberating back and forth first before acting.
wendyneo 3 years ago
You are the one disrespecting people - thinking that citizens have no wisdom and hence should all shut up (no rights to freedom of speech and assembly) and we all stupid fools should all just listen to the wisdom of one old man.
Scums like you - disrespect citizens, support leegally-corrupted regime (and then claim not pro-pap) - should leave the country, and indeed will be chased out of the country the way minions of Marcos are chased out of Philippines.
wendyneo 3 years ago
You are quick to declare you are no pro-PAP. Yet, despite my several protest that I am not from SDP, you stubbornly insist on linking me to Chee and SDP, as if my action somehow (by your warp logic) reflects on Chee/SDP! This tactic clearly expose you as having a hidden unspeakable agenda.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Moreover, Chee has written EIGHT books highlighting both the problems AND the solution for singapore. Many of them have been adopted by PAP:
yoursdp org/index.php/news/singapore/1875-pm-and-pap-mps-adopt-sdps-economic-ideas
On the other hand, PAP is quick to attribute all problems to economic recession, and yet cliam credit when global economy picks up!
In spite of all these, you chose to say - without evidence of course - that SDP lacks the knowledge (what?) possessed by PAP!
Hidden agenda!
wendyneo 3 years ago
SDP scums are cowards who insult the government, but fear the consequences.
2006 NKF Incident -
The PAP had demanded apology from SDP and affiliated parties for defamation. SDP announced ahead of time they would not be apologising. However, currently all members of the SDP and the printer have apologised except Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin
How supportive are the SDP members. lol SDP has only 2 members in fact, a family business by Chee Soon Juan and Siok Chin.
Agares 3 years ago 3
PAP scums are cowards, who have to resort to bullying and under-handed means eg defamation suits, police arrest, GRCs, ever-changing electoral boundaries and other unconstitutional means to stay in power. Cowards who dare not compete in a gentlemanly fair election!
Many SDP members caved in eventually, for the sake of their families. They are to be respected for daring to stand up for so long. Chee and his sister did not cave in at all. They are to be even more respected.
wendyneo 3 years ago
(cont) These r common sense and any upright person would view it thus. But alas, not for PAP ball-carriers, who are out to smear oppositions (esp those who advocate an overhaul of the system and thus is a real threat to PAP).
AGARES, is the money really that good? Twisting falsehood to become "truth" and vice versa to ensure your dictatorial political master stay in power forever via unconstitutional means, is really a low way to make a living. Do you not have some self-respect? Zzzz
wendyneo 3 years ago
Anyway, why make comments pend approvals? Are you that afraid to receive bad comments about you that may defame your legacy and propaganda?
You are acting like your so-called PAP who publishes the newspaper the way they want.
Agares 3 years ago 2
That's because I cannot bear the thought of my readers puking over your nonsensical illogical ball-carrying comments without reading my rebuttal there side-by-side.
And I do not have the time to entertain your nonsense everyday, so comments shall be pending till I find that time to rebut you. That's not against free speech, you ball-carrier!
wendyneo 3 years ago
You are currently comparing a small country with 4.8 million population to a big continent of 21 million. Australia is more than 1000 times bigger than us, but only 4 times more population.
I hope you didn't think that employment here is easy. Considering the number of jobs available here and there, it's not easy for us to pay the citizens the same amount as the Australians.
So what do you have to say to this statement Miss/Mrs/Mdm Wendy Neo?
Agares 3 years ago 2
Aust size and poln are irrelevant fact. Sg should have a min wage system. Given wages that are sufficient to raise a family, singaporeans would be willing to work as construction workers etc.
I wonder what you, ball-carrier Agares, has to say to this statement, which is expounded more here:
youtube com/watch?v=JLScKREOpMU&fmt=18
I am "Miss Neo". If you had wanted to know if I have a bf or am married, you could have ask directly. Thank you.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Oh by the way, I believe you have nothing to do with SDP. Who wants to be affiliated with an uncivilised party?
I don't have to rebutt any of your statements against PAP, because I don't have to stoop low to respond to those insults. I was here to remind you some courtesy towards the constitution. Why would I want to hear from a vulgar person who insults the current government more than to provide constructive information to improve the issues?
Agares 3 years ago 2
Yes, YOU agares, should show some respect for The Constitution, which allows for peaceful assembly.
SDP, in disobeying illegal laws that violates The Constitution, is not being uncivilised; it is showing the highest respect for the highest law of the land - The Constitution.
Consturctive info to improve the issues are abundant in my videos eg:
youtube com/watch?v=FwCVd_PE4mE
youtube com/watch?v=_oJX-hzNY8U
Quit carrying balls, you shameless one!
wendyneo 3 years ago
exploitation?
a friend of mine is getting paid AUD$17 per hour working in a restaurent as a cleaner. i wonder how much a cleaner getting paid in singapore?
qert079 3 years ago 2
Less than S$600 a month, and getting lesser every year, due to influx of foreign workers. In australia, lower-end jobs are reserved for citizens so that lowly educated citizens can earn enough to support their families. All developed countries do that - protect vulnerable citizens.
PAP practices elitism. If you are not in the gifted stream, then sorry hor, you die is your own business. In fact, sg is not a country but a company and our leaders are not employers:
youtube com/watch?v=_oJX-hzNY8U
wendyneo 3 years ago
eh, a friend of mine from, whom is a double degree holder is doing part time job as a cleaner in a restaurent is getting paid au$17 /hr.
umm, isn't our local currency is 'almost' on par with aussie currency?
also, elitism? i dunno what that is but i recognize the foundation of Nazism. hahaha
qert079 3 years ago 2
hah, wats that? song kah?
qert079 3 years ago
click on "more info" for lyrics.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Wendy, I think you've gotta know this. You are very disrespectful towards the PAP. Regardless of their governance, there are still people who believe in their abilities. If you are to call their supporters names, or people who are brainwashed, then you should come with a reason why we should support your barbaric propaganda.
SDP had supporters, nobody posted anything to defame the party. Do something to convince the people, not defame the government.
Agares 3 years ago
Agares, there is absolutely nothing wrong to be disrespectful towards PAP - a party that LEEgalised corruption, that sold Singapore to foreigners, and that lost billions of our hard-earned money, not to mention a dictatorship.
There is however something very wrong to reject the above reasons (and to instead insist like a mad running dog that I had not "come [up] with a reason"), and to be respectful of such a dictatorial PAP.
wendyneo 3 years ago
(cont)
It is wrong because it shows that you are willing to sell your soul to the devil for the sake of money and power. I suggest you quit being a running dog, for your parents' sake.
Note: You have been very rude to me FIRST on my other video web page where you made personal attacks and name-callings against me without provocation, so I am entitled to retaliate BACK here by calling you a running dog. Tit for tat for something that YOU started first :)
wendyneo 3 years ago
1stly, SDP is SDP's business, not my business; I am not from SDP. 2ndly, I have done enough video that can convince any reasonable citizen. Dogs however are not convince-able, since they can gain money and power from PAP. Finally, it is not defamation when it is the truth. While LKY like to anyhow use defamation suits on his opponents, he is LKY! Who are you? Your copycat-like use of "defamation" is laughable. You are not fit to use that word on your master's behalf. lol
wendyneo 3 years ago
Many of my videos show facts. One of them is even a serious Q & A:
youtube com/watch?v=FwCVd_PE4mE
A few, such as this video, illustrate my *understandable* anger at a LEEgally corrupted regime which insist on letting 80 years old citizens clear plates, while pocketing salaries higher than the COMBINED salary of G8 nation leaders! (Yet another 2 reasons to rebut your nonsense that I have not come up with "a reason").
wendyneo 3 years ago
(cont)
Thus, as can be seen, none of my video are propaganda, let alone "barbaric" ones!
Instead, "barbaric propaganda" belongs to YOU and your PAP INTERNET BRIGADE mates. I suggest that you quit doing that for your own karmic good :)
wendyneo 3 years ago
> If you are to call their supporters names
I have never done that. I reserve the phrase "running dog" or other derogatory terms ONLY as a RETALIATION against those who make vulgar/personal attack against me FIRST, WITHOUT PROVOCATION
Egs would be those who FOR NO REASON, INITIATE calling me "bitch", "scum" etc. Or insult me: "an attn-seeking whore who needs her pussy..." etc
Under such circumstances, my use of "dog" is not only a justified retaliation, but may well hold a lot of truth! lol
wendyneo 3 years ago
Lol why get so worked up with PAP and my comments? Personally you've seen a lot of its supporters and they are comfortable with the government. Yes people leave SG for good, but what can you assure us with?
Did you think freedom of speech and to everything would bring us to what we are at world's level today? You wouldn't want us to be like the Thais and Indonesians do you? Killings in riots and strikes.
Make the citizens believe in you and SDP before you try to badmouth PAP here.
Agares 3 years ago
>they are comfortable with the government
They are not. They do not get to vote because oppositions candidates dare not stand up for elections due to PAP's defamation suits, GRC, ever-changing electoral boundaries etc. If PAP is so sure that it has lots of supporters, why does it not dare to scrape GRC etc.
And don't for a moment tell me GRC is for minority candidate. JBJ, as a minority, was elected twice without GRC. And so did David Marshall.
wendyneo 3 years ago
> but what can you assure us with?
I am not a politician. I do not need to assure you or any Singaporean of anything! *amused*
However, common sense should assure you that having check and balance and democracy is critical to any country's survival and SG - in spite of its small size, lack of natural resource (and all other irrelevant truth thrown in by pap supporters) - is no exception!
It is check & balance that allowed the Americans to throw out Bush (after his limited 2 terms of office).
wendyneo 3 years ago
> Did you think freedom of speech and to everything would bring us to what we are at world's level today?
Don't give me the "freedom.. to everything" nonsense! You are not a 3 yr old and neither am I. So, you know very well nobody is asking for extreme freedom to everything eg to murder, to rape etc. Stop treating me/readers as if we are idiots. It only reflects on yousrelf - that you are idiotic enough to think we are idiots.
wendyneo 3 years ago
> Did you think freedom of speech.. would bring us to what we are at world's level today?
Yes! Indeed, if not for the existence of *some* (limited) form of freedom of speech within PAP pre-1990, where LKY's peers eg Ong Pang Boon, Toh Chin Chye, Ong Teng Cheong etc are around to moderate his extremism, Sg would not be at its 1990 level.
Post-1990, LKY runs a 1-man show with zero free speech and all his eugenics elitism come out in the form of FTrash import, zero welfare, bringing down sg
wendyneo 3 years ago
> like the Thais and Indonesians.. Killings in riots and strikes.
Why instill unfounded fear by making IRRELEVANT comparison with undemoncratic countries? I question your motive
Singaporeans aspire to be successful democracies like UK, USA, Canada, Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Japan. And we are justfied to make such "demands", given that Lee's salary > these 8 countries COMBINED.
Sg is below G8:
youtube com/watch?v=FwCVd_PE4mE
thus, Lee is not fit to receive his LEEgally corrupted salary.
wendyneo 3 years ago
> Make the citizens believe in you and SDP before you try to badmouth PAP here.
One, I have already told you I have nothing to do with SDP. You can't read?
Two, it is not badmouth when it is the truth. I note with pleasure that you are not able to rebut any of my criticism of PAP (which I backed up with evidence and fact). All you are able to do is to keep regurgitating that I am "badmouthing" them. lol
wendyneo 3 years ago
(cont)
Three, it is the job and duty of every citizen (and opposition party) to point out the fault of the government. Every patriot should and must do that, for the sake of the country. Your strange idea that as a citizen, I am not allowed to criticise the govt (with all my valid evidence somemore), and that I am only allowed to first get citizens to "believe" in me (how? Like in a cult?), is weird and detrimental to a country's future! Sg needs check/balance and valid criticism is gd for sg!
wendyneo 3 years ago
Perfect. You ain't any politician, and you don't intend to assure us anything. So what are you doing here with your darn videos? Trying to show the people how influential you can be by opposing the government?
You ain't a 3 year-old - I'm really trying to believe that. You commented so much on 1 of my comments, how much information were relevent?
If you truly want to preach the people into your propaganda, act on it and show us something.
Anyone is capable of talking.
Agares 3 years ago 2
My videos are an expression of my beliefs. In countries which allow freedom of speech, this is common and no one would think of questioning it. Your underlying msg that since I am not a politician, I am not allowed to make these videos, is a proof of what a ball-carrier you are!
All 100% of the info I gave to rebut your nonsense are relevant.
I am in Aust. How to show action? Yes, anyone is capable of talking. But only some are good ball-carriers. You are lousy at carrying balls. lol
wendyneo 3 years ago
lol. besides calling people ball-carriers and insulting our government, what have you done? You had nothing to rebutt me Wendy, you reply by calling my statements irrelevant and then start saying how a suck-up I am to the PAP. Come on narrow-mind. Don't call people names just because they support the PAP, and gloat when people think similarly like you.
You are in Aust, good. Though I don't really believe you, but don't meddle with politics when you ain't even in the country.
Agares 3 years ago 4
Indeed your statements r irrelevant: aust size vs sg's is irrelevant to min wage argument. That's my rebuttal.
That u r not interested in proper debate (eg. you are unable to rebut me why country's size matters), but keep coming to my channel to make personal attacks (latest being abt me not being in sg), is an indication that you are indeed part of PAP INTERNET BRIGADE.
I am fully justified to RESPOND to the personal attacks INITIATED by you, by calling you a running dog in RETURN!
wendyneo 3 years ago
阁下天天上网发言,以反对政府为能事。
这让我想起了中国大陆的一个词汇 五毛 不知道阁下的五毛 来自何处。
shandongcaoxian 3 years ago
五毛指的是成天往别人的网站或别人的论坛,发表舔痣言论来讨好暴君,以便获得五毛钱的走狗。
本人在自己的网上,仗义执言,五毛与本人沾不上关系。
你明明是中国人,却天天上本人的网站为新加坡政府舔痣。阁下所收下的五毛钱来自何处,不言而喻!呵呵!
wendyneo 3 years ago
呵呵 那么新加坡人为什么不起来反抗你所说的贪污犯呢?
kiroro1991cb 3 years ago
早就起来反抗了!四十年来,有多名爱国人士因反抗而未经审讯,被关入牢房,其中一位长达三十二年!其他的,更被放逐国外,或被控告至破产。这些都是公开新闻。你显然对新加坡的了解很低。应该虚心请教。而不是自以为是,贻笑大方!
wendyneo 3 years ago
以上这种杀鸡吓猴的手段,使得多数新加坡人,不敢公开反抗。但最近,一位反对党领袖去世,千多普通公民主动去悼念他,就是一种无言的抗议:
youtube com/watch?v=cXgidlQ4dgg&fmt=18
wendyneo 3 years ago
最近,有人索性拿火去烧议员,而大多数人竟同情纵火者(可去各个新加坡论坛读),又是反抗的证据:
youtube com/watch?v=HY7WDYZfEd0&fmt=18
你肯定不知道,每年新加坡有千多人移民。他们以脚来反抗:
youtube com/watch?v=7s3zC0nXfY4&
wendyneo 3 years ago
既然如此,为什么每次人民行动党都能获得人民的支持呢
你公然的煽动民众,在任何民主国家都不会得到容许的,希望你好自为之。
shandongcaoxian 3 years ago 4
因为他们威迫人民如投反对票,就不翻新人民的组屋。因为他们擅自更换选区的界限。因为他们把有才能的反对人士告到破产,使他们无法竞选。等等!在其他的伪民主国家,还有执政党得到99%票呢!你是井底蛙,就请别贻笑大方了!呵呵!
wendyneo 2 years ago
民主国家,每天都有大把人,在合法的"煽动民众"。这就是人民当家的权利。你这个被共产独裁主义洗脑了的井底之蛙,竟以为这是不得容许的!劝你好自为之,开阔视野,别再丢人现眼!
wendyneo 2 years ago
至于你所说的高工资,我想应该与个人的贡献有关系。就算是北韩的金正日倒给钱或者是零工资,我也不愿意他的领导。新加坡人之所以选择pap,应该是他们认可harry的领导,就算是高工资,也有国会的授权。不应该你来妄作评论。
shandongcaoxian 3 years ago 4
贡献个屁!新加坡绝对没有达到八大工业国的生活水平,可是新加坡暴君拿的却是比八大工业国**加起来**还要高的工资。你连合法化了的贪污,与正当工资都分不清,根本不配在这里妄作评论!
新加坡人并没有选择pap。倘若我们有真正的民主,真正的投票程序,pap早就被踢出去了。
wendyneo 2 years ago
国会早就被独裁者以不民主的手段控制了。民主国家里,人民当家。人人有权评论,更有权制作录像,来反对人民的公仆。你这个奴才走狗,把公仆当皇帝般崇拜,无怪乎觉得人民没权利评论。奴性之深,真令人看不起。
wendyneo 2 years ago
个人很钦佩李光耀
kiroro1991cb 3 years ago
你钦佩李光耀能够把贪污合法化,以致拿比美国总统多五倍的薪水都没事?
youtube com/watch?v=LL3ELAd3CzY
还是你钦佩李光耀能诬陷反对他的人,并不经审讯,就把他们丢进牢房三十多年?
youtube com/watch?v=7uUVMxD--YA
wendyneo 3 years ago
又或是你钦佩李光耀可以把新加坡人民的血汗钱掏空?
youtube com/watch?v=q_lzrGUGAWM
莫非你钦佩李光耀可以置新加坡的老弱病残以不顾,而依然在位?
youtube com/watch?v=B3DyWJp-aXU
wendyneo 3 years ago
你的钦佩,很有意思!呵呵!
你应该钦佩的是他:
youtube com/watch?v=gCGLaiKFaX8
wendyneo 3 years ago
我佩服的是他把新加坡从发展中国家变为一个近发达国家,至于他贪不贪污,我又没看见,你有证据就拿出来,凭什么说人家贪污???
kiroro1991cb 3 years ago
拿比美国,法国,英国,日本,意大利,西班牙,加拿大与德国这八大工业国的八个领袖所加起来还要高的薪水,且还因此进吉尼斯纪录,算不算贪污?
全家以比市场低两折的优惠价格买房子,最后被发现,被逼还钱,还不算贪污?
这两件事都是国会公开纪录,因此,你他妈的还需要什么证据?
你妈生你来当走狗,专门替暴君呵脬鹏捧卵?你这个舔痣的。屁!
wendyneo 3 years ago
新加坡的成功,是因为当年行动党内有其他元老来压制李老贼的极端行为。证据就是,如今李老贼独揽大权,新加坡已走下坡。
wendyneo 3 years ago
>至于他贪不贪污,我又没看见
倘若你是新加坡人,我所叙述的那两件超级大事,你应有所闻。别以比三岁孩还幼稚的没看见当借口。你的言论绝对是走狗行为。我赐你这首歌:
youtube com/watch?v=tTYKdEpegBA
倘若你不是新加坡人,请阅读我任何录像右首"more info"里,写给你们这些外国人的告白。你这只外来走狗 - 该死!
wendyneo 3 years ago
你的嘴巴原来是这么臭,你为了让人听信你的观点,就爆粗口,我看你为了反对一个人就想尽办法污蔑他人,鬼才信你的话!我以为你会说几句英语就是文明人,看来你与街边的妓女或者是泼妇也无太大区别。
kiroro1991cb 3 years ago 2
就连国会的公开纪录,你都不相信,你果然是十足十的走狗一只!
李显龙薪水早被列入吉尼斯纪录。你竟把这权威的公开纪录,说成是我的个人观点,你这不是个舔痣的走狗是什么?走狗!
wendyneo 3 years ago
本人句句引经据典(比如引述国会纪录),所以没诬蔑任何人;且半句粗口都没对你说过,因此嘴巴非常干净。你这只走狗,信口开河,胡言乱语诬赖本人暴粗口,且拒绝接受国会纪录,作人身攻击,嘴巴果然臭得可以!
wendyneo 3 years ago
你妈确实是个妓女,难怪生下你这个狗娘养的(走)狗杂种!你把会说英语的,看成是文明人,这显示你殖民地的奴性还在。你确实是无可救药的走狗!哈!
wendyneo 3 years ago
y u do is ?????
simon632299 3 years ago
Many reasons. For a start, PAP is LEEgally corrupted:
youtube com/watch?v=LL3ELAd3CzY
If you want more reasons, see all my videos. Start with this (contain serious Q and A) -
youtube com/watch?v=FwCVd_PE4mE
wendyneo 3 years ago
Curiously (and this is based on anecdotal rather than hard-statistical evidence) I see more Singaporeans wanting to leave Singapore permanently than, say, Hong Kongers or Taiwanese. Second question: If Singapore is better off than these two places ie. HK and/or Taiwan then why are people so keen to leave Singapore permanently?
My questions are genuine and I do not mean to offend or insult anyone here. I'd love to live in Singapore, HK or Taiwan. If only I could afford it....
newhigh2008 3 years ago
The hard stats is that Singapore has the world's 2nd highest emigration rate, after east timor!
A2: Singapore is much worse than HK and Taiwan. For one, they have democracy (though not full-fledged or in its mature form) and free speech and free media. For another, they have better welfare than sg, has min wage system while sg has none, has lower GINI coefficient etc.
wendyneo 3 years ago
You would love to live in sg, if you are here only to make money. Sg has low tax rate.
But if you treat it as your homeland/country and you are caring enough to be concerned for your lesser-off citizens and patriotic enough to bother abt the long term future of the undemocratic country with no check and balance, you would be in living hell.
Sg is a company, not a country.
wendyneo 3 years ago
I'm from Australia and am impressed at the loyalty and gratitude Singaporeans seem to have for Mr Lee. Many people clearly love the old fella and seem happy that he draws his SG$1million dollar pension (does anyone know if this pension exceeds that of other former world leaders?)
Q1. Can anyone name any post-war non-communist economy with a large Chinese population that has NOT succeeded?
newhigh2008 3 years ago
His pension is way beyond 1 million. It's 2/3 of his salary and his salary is now past 3 million! He has been receiving BOTH a pension and a salary, since he was 55 years old i.e. double salary for past 30 years.
A1: Singapore. Beneath the seemingly successful exterior, sg has failed. The media hides it, but the failure is slowly starting to surface.
wendyneo 3 years ago
What you should be impressed is how the 154th-ranked govt-controlled newspaper has managed to brain-washed everyone.
And you should be impressed with LKY's political gift too - not many politicians can hold elections and still manage to come up with so many successful tricks (such as changing electoral boundary every election, Grouped constituencies, defamation suits etc) to win every election!
Then again, what is so impressive? Dictators all over the world have won "free" elections! lol
wendyneo 3 years ago
Well Wendyneo, so you do agree that Mr Lee did "delivered the goods", so to speak ? Never mind your ego, but the fact remains that he has put Spore in the state it is today. "Ups" and "Downs" are inevitable in life, politics no exception. You are bent to focus on the latter. These exchanges can roller-coaster forever. Lets put it aside. Let's say Mr Lee was lucky. Luck plays an impotant part in life. In your endevour to be known as an absolute PAP opposer, I wish you plenty of LUCK !!!
seapss 3 years ago 2
No, that's not what I said. I said he *may* have delivered *some* goods. The word "may" is impt because strictly speaking it was not lky, but people like Toh Chin Chye, Ong Pang Boon etc who delivered while keeping LKY's etremism in check. And the evidence is in what happened post-1990 when LKY runs a 1-man show.
"some" is also an impt word because the damage that LKY did outweighs the delivery, similar to the overall assessment of other dictators such as Mao etc - FAIL!
wendyneo 3 years ago
We should put aside LKY's personal "luck" (actually, more of cruelty. If Lim Chin Siong has the cruelty to betray his comrade the way LKY did, destiny would have changed. Nothing to do with luck.)
Let's talk about Singapore's "luck" instead. Do you think we should let our beloved Sg's future be dictated by luck? By whether Chee is luckier or Lee is luckier? Don't you wish for a 2-party, check-and-balance situation where sg's future is assured, and not dependent on luck?
wendyneo 3 years ago
Btw, in democratic country, I would not need "luck". I won't kena ISD if I am "unlucky". I won't be sued if I am "unlucky". I would be able to stand up for my country without fear of running out of "luck"! And the best person will be able to lead SG, even if he is not as "lucky" (cruel to opponents?) as LKY, or even if he is not lucky enough to be LKY's son!
Surely, that's much better for sg. No?
When you need to wish me "luck", it's already an indication of how sad a place sg is!
wendyneo 3 years ago
Just been back from holiday in Perth.
Nice place, friendly people makes you feel welcomed. Lets hope the place won't get too conjested with undesirable imports. Yes Wendyneo, you're not totally wrong to say Mr Lim Chin Siong or anyone else for that matter could have make Spore
a better place to live in. But "would
haves" & "could haves" are cheap excuses commonly used in arguments. Mr Lee delivered the goods. And therefore he deserves the respect. You will NEVER want to agree with this.
seapss 3 years ago 3
seapss, Lee *may* have delivered *some* goods in the past. But, post-1990, sg is doing down the drain. That's because absolute power corrupts absolutely, and with no peers to moderate his extremism, sg suffers! This is like Mao Ze Dong who chased out the foreigners, but did great damage during cultural revolution. And so on, with all dictators.
Thus, check and balance and democracy and free speech/media etc to prevent absolute power are very impt. I am glad some oppo party is working for that.
wendyneo 3 years ago
actually, "would have", "could have" are not cheap excuses, if they are backed by serious studies and intelligent deduction. For eg. LIM was a socialist who cared a lot for the poor, sick, elderly etc. LEE is an ultra-right capitalist who cares only abt making money. It is not mere speculation to say that the poor, sick etc would be better off under LIM. See my Lim's video, where I talk a bit abt that.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Hey KingKenTut, you're now 39 years old. It means your parents were also in the Lee Kuan Yew era when he struggled to make Spore what it is today !! Ask you dad first before you post such ridiculous comments. Without Mr Lee you will now be wondering when is your next meal will come instead of wondering how much Mr Lee is going to die !!. You are igorant and are of an ungrateful breed !! You should cherish your great leader !! Go and overhaul that " curd" between your ears !!
seapss 3 years ago 3
seapss, Lee Con You did NOT struggle in any way, to make sg what it is today! Instead, he "fixed" his more popular comrade, Mr. LIM CHIN SIONG, so as to unlawfully gain political power. (Go watch my LCS video).
Sg is what it is today due to hardworking S'poreans and LKY's PAP peers such as TOH CHIN CHYE and ONG PANG BOON and ONG TENG CHEONG etc, who were there to moderate LKY's extremism. Post-1990, when LKY runs a 1-man show in pap, his extremism (e.g. extreme FT import) is ruining sg.
wendyneo 3 years ago
seapss,
"cherish your great leader"? Wiow, your choice of words is no diff from N. Korea and China during the cultural revolution, where leaders are worshiped. Are you a slave living under an Emperor?
LKY/PAP are our civil SERVANTS i.e. maids! Do you ever tell your family to "cherish our great leader" when talking about your MAID? Stop being a slave. We are employers of the country and pap is our employee. Go and overhaul that slavish mentality in your head!
wendyneo 3 years ago
seapss, you're now 58 yrs old. This means you were in the era where Lee Con You betrayed LIM CHIN SIONG, and make Spore what it is today - an ultra-right company with zero-welfare and a playground for the super-rich.
Without Lee, all S'poreans - including the sick, poor and elderly - would be well-taken care of by socialist-at-heart LIM CHIN SIONG. Go watch my video on him.
Being 58, you are not ignorant of these. Thus, can I conclude that u r pretending to be ignorant to carry balls? :)
wendyneo 3 years ago
Seapss, yes, we should all be wondering when Lee Con You is going to die - that is, if we truly love SINGAPORE (which is diff from PAP)!
1stly, lky legalised corruption in Singapore, and that's bad for Singapore. Watch this video:
youtube com/watch?v=LL3ELAd3CzY
wendyneo 3 years ago
(cont)
2ndly, lky's ELITISM - e.g. grad mother scheme and its current continuation in the disguised form of high tax rebates to high-paying career women while denying PR to non-grad foreign wives of non-grad singaporeans, etc - and EXTREMISM - eg. extreme import of foriengers etc - are destroying our beloved Singapore.
Do you love Singapore or do you love PAP. If you love Singapore, start wondering when LKY will die!
wendyneo 3 years ago
But to tell you the truth, I actually *worry* - rather than wonder - about lky's death. He has not instituted a check-and-balance 2-party system. His ministers are selfish money-face who threatened to quit governing singapore unless we raise their salaries by 1 million each by year end! His son is a clown; who puts on a clown hat:
youtube com/watch?v=JQSAefPb6Yo
and talks like a clown:
youtube com/watch?v=Q4_P6q6CfsQ
LKY's death may bring chaos due to these. I am worried. Very worried.
wendyneo 3 years ago
I am wondering.......
whn tis old man LEE KUAN YEW gonna DIE......??
every month he is collecting more than S$100k....
better give tat monies to the needy.....!
KingKenTuT 3 years ago
There is such a thing called legalised corruption. High pay high bonus for CEO, MP and Ministers in their renumeration package irregardless of their zero contribution.
williamtan74 3 years ago 3
williamtan74, indeed there is! And I have made a video with this "legalised corruption" theme:
youtube com/watch?v=LL3ELAd3CzY
Enjoy! :)
wendyneo 3 years ago
Hi Wendy
So nobody can topple than let the nation do the job lor! You are great and cute! Take Care!
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago
Hi Wendy, Just knew that you have migrated to Australia! My loving place because I like fishing. A very peaceful and relaxing place if we have enough Vitamin 'M'. Do you agree? Not bad, You understand the meaning of Dak Boleh Tahang! Wishes you have a great success in life and make it big in the future. I beleive you are a Teochew lady! Teochew are very very good in business. This is in born in them and I also dont know why. Most of my big bizman friend are Teochew. Gd Luck! Cheers!
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago
Hi Wendy, Durai is due to the management team internal weakness to allows him to draw high pay. JBJ indeed make mistake by not carefully talk without a solidified proofs against his opponent even what he said is truth. In any country, facts and figures is the only way to topple or judge a person and not just by empty talking. Our government can legalised their huge earnings is their strength and we can not prove them wrong doing is our opposition weakness! Nice having a wonderful debate with you
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago 2
>"Durai is due to the management team internal weakness to allows him to draw high pay."
Same as PAP. If Ong Pang Boon, Toh Chin Chye etc are ard, maybe lky cannot implement such legalised corruption too. There were gd pple in pap in the past - some of his peers.
>"JBJ indeed make mistake by not carefully talk"
careful also no use. Chinese say: 欲加之罪,何患无辞。Wolf wants to eat sheep, any excuse also can - Aesop fable :)
wendyneo 3 years ago
Hi lovely Wendy, very glad to have you to be part of Singapore who concern about Singapore issue which most ladies normally dont bother! I totally agreed with you that they have legalised the earning. Nobody can topple PAP except the nation. Do you agrees? Be fare to PAP that they have took alots but they have done their parts also. May be they are not up to your expectation but they are not too bad either, right? Hope one fine day for those who are not good for Singapore should topple! Cheer
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago 2
>"Nobody can topple PAP except the nation. "
That's because they have implemented GRC. Ta ma de.
>"Be fare to PAP that they have took alots but they have done their parts also."
In the past, maybe. But since lky run his 1-man show in pap in post 1990, they have taken a lot more, but produced a lot less.
>"Hope one fine day for those who are not good for Singapore should topple! "
By that time, too late for Singapore! Should be toppled now, while sg is still only a bit ill.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Hi Wendy Neo, officially above board, our government is drawing the highest salary in the world but dont forget the rest of the government might have drawn 10 times higher than our government under table. I hope we Singaporean should use apple to apple comparision rather than having our personal emotional feels. Jo Leng
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago
ferrouschloride,
other govt may draw 10 0times more, but 1. it's legitimate money from private org eg Clinton wrote books, or 2. they can be brought to justice one day for corruption. Ours cannot, because our govt legalised corruption. Eg. Durai cannot be punished for his legally corrupted salary. So, apple to apple, no other govt has legalised corruption the way our govt did!
wendyneo 3 years ago
Corruption? our neighbours have much higher corruption compared to us. we're quite good already :)
bingqi 3 years ago 8
bingqi,
1. our neighbours' corruption are not at the highest level, but at the police kopi-money level.
2. Even if it's at highest level (which you have no evidence), it is illegal and can one day be brought to justice.
3. Our leaders have already fully legalised corruption via high salary. We can never bring them to justice, just as we could not with Durai.
I made this point right above your comment. Why you make me repeat it again for you?
wendyneo 3 years ago
Hi Wendy Neo, whole of Singapore knows PAP always use defamation laws suit, jail and bankruptcy as a weapon! A smart and capable tactical opposition shouldnt fall into this trap again and again therefore I still believe temporary PAP is still the best leaders for Singapore. I am not brainwashed by PAP and I knows alot about Singapore happenings. We Singaporean are not blindfolded and PAP can not fool whole of Singapore. May be one day they might topple if they dont perform. Who knows?Jo Leng
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago
ferrouschloride,
Depend on how you think lor. diff pple diff idea. WP works within the system. But i think even if WP get another 10 members into parliament oso no use. PAP can sue, jail, bankrupt all of them, and kick them out of Parliament the way it did to JBJ. SDP's way is to insist on full constitutional rights and raise awareness of injustice done by pap. If enough pple are indignant, the people will not allow pap to anyhow sue, jail, bankrupt. That's solving problem at the root. no?
wendyneo 3 years ago
ferrouschloride, u know of all the injustice, but u still say lky is your idol! this is dangerous because u probably r thinking: "nevermind, i dont go into politics. The jail, defamation, bankruptcy dont apply to me." But one day, when it finally affects u, it will be too late! Eg 1 Wat if u get arrested wrongly, and no free media to help expose/rescue you? Eg 2. the Sim family din expect controlled media (which can cover up wrongdoings) to affect them but it did!
youtube com/watch?v=PE2u0l083Nc
wendyneo 3 years ago
Hi, Mr Lee Kuan Yew is my idiol and PAP is not the best in Singapore but till now I have not seen any party yet as good as them! Singapore is a small country and we should not have too much of free speeches because it will create unneccesary problems to our country. If one day PAP did not do their part or did not honour what they suppose to delivery, I strongly believe the only party to topple them is themself! Faithful Singaporean.
Ferrouschloride 3 years ago 2
Ferrouschloride,
LKY is a dictator who legalised corruption via highest salary in the world. But to each his own, if u want to idolise him, it is your problem.
U have not seen any better party because pap did not let u see - defamation suits, imprisonment, bankruptcy etc.
Don't use "small" as an excuse, the way pap brainwashed us. Free speech allows superior ideas to emerge and is gd for sg.
PAP has already not performed for 40 yrs - 1 suicide/day, elderlies on st. Did they topple themselves?
wendyneo 3 years ago
一臭万年
geodome83 3 years ago
These are my videos. What do you call a comment written by the video owner on her own video page? Spam? Only pap internet brigade doggies will mark my comments on my own video page as spam.
SG under PAP. No freedom. Exposed.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Go thru each of my video. All my comments directed against PAP INTERNET BRIGADE has been marked as "SPAM" by doggies from that said brigade!
I INVITE EVERYONE TO READ THESE "SPAM"
This is how SG is run by PAP.
NO FREEDOM UNDER PAP!
wendyneo 3 years ago
TO ALL YOUTUBERS ALL OVER THE WORLD:
One of the many ways Singapore's People's Action Party (PAP) govt censor free speech & manages online dissidents - It gets its "PAP INTERNET BRIGADE" running dogs to mark dissenting youtube comments as spam!
Browse through my video "SHINE FOR SINGAPORE"'s comment pages: You will find 8 comments labeled as "spam" - all r my own comments on my own video! This is no accident. 2 more comments on my "Bishan" videos r censored too.
NO FREEDOM UNDER PAP.
wendyneo 3 years ago
TO ALL YOUTUBERS ALL OVER THE WORLD:
One of the many ways Singapore's People's Action Party (PAP) govt censor free speech & manages online dissidents - It gets its "PAP INTERNET BRIGADE" running dogs to mark dissenting youtube comments as spam!
Browse through my video "SHINE FOR SINGAPORE"'s comment pages: You will find 4 comments labeled as "spam" - all r my own comments on my own video! This is no accident. 2 more comments on my "Bishan" videos r censored too.
NO FREEDOM UNDER PAP.
wendyneo 3 years ago
Do I feel sorry for this PAP politician who passed away?
Oh a personal level, yes.
Oh a broader level, no, I honestly do not.
Who is to feel sorry for Dr Chee Soon Juan, Francis Seow, JBJ and Zuhairi.
Let's not forget Lim Chin Siong.
SingaporeChannel 3 years ago 2
'Zuhairi' Do u mean Said Zahari?..
Said Zahari-Detained in Operation Cold Store 1
On e night he became President of Parti Rakyat Singapura..A Nationalist Party that was Labelled "Communistic' By LKY..
ayzkhai 3 years ago 4
Lim Chin Siong and many others especially Chia Thye Poh who was detained without trial for 32 empty years as he does not wish to be forced to sign a statement of making him a 'communist'. These are great patriots.
enikisser 3 years ago
ur lame
ronnie22shade 3 years ago
ronnie22share,
R.I.P.
wendyneo 3 years ago
When an opposition member's brother dies in a tragic murder, he is demonised and character assassinated together with ALL non-PAP party members.
When a PAP politician dies, the citizens are spoon-fed propaganda by the state controlled media that is Channel News Asia, Straits Times, The New Paper, Mediacorp.
SingaporeChannel 3 years ago 3