Ask not what your government can do for you, ask your government to get off our backs. Kucinich seems like a nice honest man, but he's not as smart as Ron Paul, and his rhetoric certainly doesn't get me excited like Ron Paul's talk of Liberty and restoring the constitution. If you like what Kucinich is saying, I would suggest checking out Ron Paul. He just makes sense, you'll see, go ahead, do a search, it only takes one watch and soon you will join The Revolution as well...
Yeah, I was a gung ho Paul supporter. But now that I've seen a lot of Dennis' vids, I'm probly going to change. It's time to evolve past warmongering and promote peace.
Paul and Kucinich are drastically different in many regards. Yes, there foreign-policy views are similar (Gravel's there with them, as well), but they've got many glaring difference, too; look at their economics views.
Well, I do get slightly annoyed by dennis's claims to exclusivity on the stance of peace, since it isn't true (see ron paul, mike gravel), but that is minor. I watched this right after watching kotecki interview ron paul, and I decided that I like kucinich better, but ron still rules.
See, wouldn't someone come across as much more honest and nuanced if they stated that, say, none of the "major" candidates voted against the war? Or mabye that they were one of the "few" to vote against the war? I'd like candidates that were honest about the other candidates. I'd vote for them out of sheer respect for telling it like it is.
Yeah, well it would be kind of nice, but it's nuts to vote for someone just because he's "honest and tells it like it is." I like Ron Paul's candor and "character," but I quite disagree with some of his ideas; so, I probably wouldn't vote for him.
the thing that gets me about paul is his belief in the free market. I don't get how he can trust a system of greed. corporations will do anything to make an extra buck, not just make better products for lower prices. Otherwise, I'd support paul because he is more charismatic and has a better chance of winning.
Something I wonder about:
Assuming DK was in Congress in '01, did he vote to give Bush the authority to go after the perpetrators of 9/11?
I think his vote on that particular issue would say a lot about his overall position on the use of force in national defense.
RMMHS4RP 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your videos are ghay. thank god for you that YouTube/Google is an online media branch for the ultra-liberal wing of the Democrat Party.
wowzers987654321 4 years ago
Ask not what your government can do for you, ask your government to get off our backs. Kucinich seems like a nice honest man, but he's not as smart as Ron Paul, and his rhetoric certainly doesn't get me excited like Ron Paul's talk of Liberty and restoring the constitution. If you like what Kucinich is saying, I would suggest checking out Ron Paul. He just makes sense, you'll see, go ahead, do a search, it only takes one watch and soon you will join The Revolution as well...
bambooduh 4 years ago
as much as i like ron paul i dislike all these ron paul fans constantly going RON PAUL REVOLUTION LA LA la...enough please....
crocodilewerewolf 4 years ago
Yeah, I was a gung ho Paul supporter. But now that I've seen a lot of Dennis' vids, I'm probly going to change. It's time to evolve past warmongering and promote peace.
Jmuduke 4 years ago 3
Paul and Kucinich are drastically different in many regards. Yes, there foreign-policy views are similar (Gravel's there with them, as well), but they've got many glaring difference, too; look at their economics views.
Commando303X 4 years ago
Well, I do get slightly annoyed by dennis's claims to exclusivity on the stance of peace, since it isn't true (see ron paul, mike gravel), but that is minor. I watched this right after watching kotecki interview ron paul, and I decided that I like kucinich better, but ron still rules.
BrickSalad 4 years ago
Well, they all do that: pretend everyone else is in one group. Gravel's also done it.
Commando303X 4 years ago
See, wouldn't someone come across as much more honest and nuanced if they stated that, say, none of the "major" candidates voted against the war? Or mabye that they were one of the "few" to vote against the war? I'd like candidates that were honest about the other candidates. I'd vote for them out of sheer respect for telling it like it is.
BrickSalad 4 years ago
Yeah, well it would be kind of nice, but it's nuts to vote for someone just because he's "honest and tells it like it is." I like Ron Paul's candor and "character," but I quite disagree with some of his ideas; so, I probably wouldn't vote for him.
Commando303X 4 years ago
the thing that gets me about paul is his belief in the free market. I don't get how he can trust a system of greed. corporations will do anything to make an extra buck, not just make better products for lower prices. Otherwise, I'd support paul because he is more charismatic and has a better chance of winning.
BrickSalad 4 years ago
Than whom?
Commando303X 4 years ago