Evolution is a fool's folly. Evolution says I can put my seiko watch in a bag, pulverize it w/a hammer into dust, then shake the bag for a billion years, open the bag, and my watch will somehow form. How much more complex are we---and that bombardier beetle's explosive mechanism---than that watch? Only fools believe in evolution.
@gr33nm0rgan Too bad you live a sad life. A life in wich you do not take time to understand the true beauty of the world you were lucky to be brought in. Deny evolution, deny quantum mecanics : deny yourself.
@gr33nm0rgan What's even funnier is that you don't even practice what you preach. You beleive in a religion that's supposed to be based on love and respect, yet you are arrogant : you speak in the name of god and curse others who do believe the powers of the christ.
Unsurprisingly lots of cliche insults thrown at theists from atheists.
Yet I haven't seen a single explanation for the inexplicable mechanism of Bombardier through random mutations.
To atheists(anti-religious, whatever you are): You are the most religious group here, stop throwing around that word, its hypocritical. Insulting yourself isn't clever.
To religious doomsayers: You aren't going to convert anybody over youtube, don't waste your time.
@josh9294 "Yet I haven't seen a single explanation for the inexplicable mechanism of Bombardier through random mutations." If you had tried to look it up just once in your life you would have found the explanation... do you expect the scientists to chase you down because it's so important to explain it to someone who obviously gives a shit about science?
@Trenaur Or, yah know, the infinite, myriad, and beautiful results of evolution overtime. But don't let the evidence keep you from believing something for no reason at all.
And on other news; Trenaur does not understand evolution. He has been reported of making very little effort to do so, despite significant amounts of explanations all around him. People with degrees in labcoats agree that there is little chance of him ever understanding it.
@EpicPremonition Your comment is even more proof that you're stupid. Instead of having your head shoved so far up your ass that opening your eyes sees the interior of your colon and nothing else, pull it out and examine things without this assumption that what PEOPLE tell you the bible is saying, is what it means. You are one step removed even from christianity, because YOU don't understand the bible and let the ignorant who think they're wise tell you its meaning.the bible warns of this.
you people are stupid.he allowed hell to exist for punishment for people who had sinned against him.and he never created you to go to hell.he can forgive your sins when you confess it to him by praying.and the universe was not created in 7 days it was the earth.
That frog definitely wasn't expecting that LOL. Any insect that can make a frog do that is not to be messed with. I wonder where this bug's place in the food chain is.
"Science?" Science proves nothing. For example, you think, " Oh, God didn't create water. Water is just Hydrogen and Oxygen." But just because you figured out HOW God made it, doesn't mean God didn't make it. Catch my drift? Read the Bible.
@ryanboz46: Why don't you get the plague, yell at the sky, and beat yourself with a wooden board and see how far the Bible gets you with curing your illness, you religious nutjob... I'll take my science and anti-biotics that actually do something useful over your creationist bullshit anyday. Listen to the scientist, not the pastor!
You are quite literally, retarded. Science DOES prove things, unlike the Bible which just relies on faith, not facts. Enjoy your life of blind obedience.
well while my grammer was incorrect "and accidental minister" i guess you skipped where it said not to judge someone right? moron? matthew 7:3--"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? minister these nuts in your mouth...now if you really want to discus scripture im not the average idiot..lets see what you really know "minister" hahahahahahah gay pussy!
"I guess you skipped where it said not to judge someone right?" So you say that, then end your post with "gay pussy." Not only are you dumb, but hypocritical as well. As it says in Genesis 4:20--"Let he who respondeth to trolls be forever the one that sucketh the most cock." Amen.
listen dick i never said i was christian or a minister...i know scripture..i was pointing it out to u...as for you i could care less what u think.. i wouldnt piss on u if u were on fire...
I would hope you wouldn't pee on me regardless of the situation. I would put you out if you were on fire though, because it's the Christian thing to do.
The Bible was written before the int4rwebs was born. It is not to be taken literally. Remember the book of Revelation's "OMG I SAW A LION THAT BREATHES FIRE AND A WASP WITH A WOMAN'S HAIR GO FLAP FLAP FLAP"?
Hell, sin, evil is not so much substance that is created. It is, or could be, im not totally sure, i wont claim to be, the abscence of gods presence in something. Just my opinion
7 days means 7 billion years, science has proven the old testament to be correct except for some parts, God has programmed the universe to expand, and the reason why God created hell is why he created us - he was bored.
@ryanboz46@ryanboz46 The bible was written by men. How exactly does it prove that god exists, then?
If you assume what the bible says is true, then, maybe 10.000 years in the future, a crazy lunatic might find out somewhere a book describing the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" and decide it's the undebatable truth, and against claims that such beliefs were preposterous, he would simply say "it's all truth! It says in our marinated holy gospel!"
@FeanorBR The amazing thing is 99% of those claiming these nonsense biblical truths in comments on youtube, are simply mirroring the words of bible "scholars", who even within the "scholarly" circles, disagree, some reconcile evolution (first cause / non directive and other methods) and some just ignore science. The biggest thing is, the bible warns (for the christian) against following blindly the words of the man who thinks himself wise enough to know what god means. Always forgotten
@ryanboz46 Science also proves tons of things, because it works upon evidence and encourages multiple approaches as well as constant revision of content (something that is shunned by religion... gee I wonder why).
By the way, the computer you are using to spread your bullshit ideas? You have science to thank for, not your god.
I'm normally all up for personal beliefs, but don't try and mix them with science. Your church already hindered scientific progress in many areas in our past.
@FeanorBR Thank you that there are atleast a few people with sense! I agree with you 100%. Religion has hindered our evolution pretty much and many people have died in the name of it.
Hahaha!, screw you mate!, i just got a mountain of documented EVIDENSE said by Evolution scientists that there is no actual proof for your made up HOAX of an "accepted theory", so stick that up your arse!!!, and i know God exists, what??!!, what do you kind of think you know we came from a cell, then a fish, then a lizard, than a monkey???, what!!!??.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What??, thats exactly what your saying!!, evolution is just blind chance, and its impossibe, and God is not imaginary, i feel his presence all the time, so who the hell are you to say that hes fake!, have you ever felt him?, have you ever talked to him, you know nothing about God, but hes bigger than your pathetic little mind that thinks it knows it all can fathom, and i laugh at you. God is true power, and you will probly never understand that, then again no one really does understand that.
it actually takes more faith to believe in a big bang theory /evolution..than it does to accept creationism..honestly..its like my throwing a stick of dynamite into a paper mill and getting the constitution.
@79mistermischief you're a moron. evolution really isn't a 'random' series of events. Its actually factors and a series of events which we humans aren't exactly technologically ready/advanced to say what they are yet. My idea: keep learning. I think God made us to learn and be in awe at his wonders. Did you know eventually down the line you could say that humans and animals are made of star dust (all solid matter is made from it)?
Just because YOU feel the presence of a god, it doesn't make that god exist beyond your mind. I could make up any imaginary creature and "talk" to it, and by your logic it would have to exist.
And there is far more proof for evolutionary theory than there is for any religious theory. Sure, both require some degree of faith, but at least science has structure. Religion just says "take my word for it, or I'll kill you."
Oh yeah... And work a bit on your spelling and punctuation.
To tell you the truth, lots of evolutionists have already sutdied it and proposed quite convincing hypotheses. Their explanations are quite easy to find just by googling it.
The two substances involved in the so-called explosion (hydroquinone and hydrogen peroxide) are quite common in insects living organisms and do not explode spontaneously when in contact. The explosion only occurs when in contact with catalyst enzymes namely catalase and peroxidase, very common in many living organisms.
You are talking about C6H4(OH)2 and H2O2. The first one should be very toxic but the other is just water with two extra oxygen atoms. But i guess it will turn out to give a very bad smelly combination when you put them together. It seems the combination also have a blind effect.
The toxic effect is merely a long term thing (i think).
@vhmunhoz i googled and googled and there were no explanations to explain how these common chemicals came together to work in harmony simultaneously. I also failed to find the mechanism that allowed the DNA to be written for the construction of the beetle. The emperor has no clothes, buddy.
@philackey Both hydrogen peroxide and various kinds of quinones are used for a great variety of body chemistry functions, both in humans as well as in many other living creatures.
The bombardier beetle's ancestors simply utilized chemicals that already happened to be around for different uses. That's often how evolution works.
@kimpeater1 Haha that's gotta be the stupidest comment I've ever read. Long ago, this beetle decided "hey, I'm going to mix these two highly explosive chemicals together, shoot them out of these two tubes that don't exist yet, and keep this frog from eating me"? Every part of this defense has to be perfectly formed before it can work. If not, the beetle blows itself up and doesn't pass on it's genes. And I would love to use chemicals in my body voluntarily, because that's possible or something.
@wasdare32 No beetle ever made a conscious decision to perform this defense mechanism. Just as no human consciously calculates the physics involved in catching a ball.
The beetle's ancestor contained a genetic mutation that allowed it to defend itself. This crude version was probably not as powerful, accurate, or otherwise as effective. In all likelihood it was possibly semi-suicidal as well. It doesn't need to be perfect at first; 1% of a gun is still better than no gun at all.
These chemicals are not reactive and thus not harmful to the beetle until they are oxidized, which is performed by separate enzymes (catalase and peroxidase in this case).
@kimpeater1 Exactly. You expect me to believe that these enzymes just happened to evolve in this beetle's body? Everything has to be kept separate until it's ready to be used, otherwise the beetle blows itself up. If one part of the system didn't work, it's completely useless.
@jib1000 That's the answer I always get when someone has no answer themselves. Why comment if you have no argument? An animal doesn't have voluntary control over the chemicals in it's body. I can't separate the oxygen in my blood with the hemoglobin and use the oxygen with hydrogen to make water if my body starts getting dehydrated. But that's what evolutionist say happened to this beetle when it developed the ability to use hydrogen peroxide and catalase.
@wasdare32 Why does the beetle need to consciously be in control of it? As these beetles evolved they weren't consciously trying to get this end result. Your analogy of oxygen and hemoglobin is ridiculous and has nothing to do with these beetles. Once again, go read a book on evolution or chemistry and get back to me.
@jib1000 You're a moron. Just tell everyone to read something if you run out of arguments. School textbooks still print the evolution of horses as linear even though over 50 years ago evolutionists agreed that it was more of a tree shape. Books aren't always right. Science constantly changes and old facts are deemed completely false. I'm in college pursuing a Ph.D in chemical engineering so I know my stuff. Everyone assumes that if you don't believe in evolution then you're against all science.
@wasdare32 If you don't ACCEPT evolution(There is no belief involved, you either accept or deny facts. Evolution is a fact.) then its pretty hard for any rational person to think you'd accpet any scientific facts. If you don't accept evolution then why do you accept gravity? There's more data about evolution and we understand how it works better than we understand how gravity works.
Please explain how the evolution of the horse is tree shaped??? What does that even mean???
@jib1000 Actually there's very few things in science that are "fact". I know that very well. Evolution is a THEORY, that's why it's called the THEORY OF EVOLUTION. Don't tell me it's a fact when even the believers know it's not fact. We could sit here and argue about evolution because it hasn't been proven. It's been proven that it's possible and even that it might be more likely than any other theory, but it's not 100% true. I don't believe anything unless I have proof, science included.
@wasdare32 "even the believers know it's not fact"
Anyone who studies evolution or even general science will disagree. Scientists know trillions of facts, even in a narrow field of study. Facts are data, that's almost all information in science. Theories encompass many laws and facts. One of the facts that the theory of evolution contains is the FACT that evolution is true. Any scientist in a related field will agree. Dozens of scientific disciplines require evolution to be true just to exist.
@jib1000 It wouldn't be a theory if it was completely true. Law of biogenesis is a LAW. That means that it's been proven true. Same with law of thermodynamics and newton's laws. Evolution is a THEORY, which is far from making it true. Just because we've found some similar looking fossils in the ground doesn't mean the animals were related at all. Mosquitoes and flies are two different species not related at all. Yet if we find two similar looking fossils people want to call them missing links.
@wasdare32 I suggest you go look up what a scientific theory is. You're just absolutely wrong. Theories is science cover much more that laws do. The theory of evolution is a fact. Try asking a scientist.
@jib1000 "As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A clear distinction needs to be made between facts (things which can be observed and/or measured) and theories (explanations which correlate and interpret the facts."
@sturger No, evolution is both. Evolution is a framework supported by vast amounts of data which makes it a theory. Evolution is also something that has been observed, measured, and recorded in nature, making it a fact.
@jib1000 A theory cannot also be a fact to a scientist. We have theories like evolution and gravitation which are so robust that we can use them as a basis for other experiments and observations and we consider them as facts, but a theory can never officially be true -- it just hasn't been disproven yet.
The distinction that you're looking for is that the BASIS of theories like evolution and gravitation are true, but their MECHANISMS are theoretical.
@fdssg Gravitation is very poorly understood as a mecanism in general. (We describe how it works at the cosmic scale and the macrometric scale, but we don't have anything solid for "the big picture" (considering the quantum scaler gravitation)
@MrOvipare I am not a scientist, so forgive me for probably asking something stupid :p Isn't the theory of relativity what is used for a better understanding of what is usually called gravity, or am I being confused?
@Piatasify What you are asking is not stupid at all! "Special relativity" mainly concerns stuff hapenning when you approach speed of light and all. "General Relativity" like you said is a better explanation for gravity than Newton's theory. It is more precise and predicts thing that Newton's theory could not explain (i.e. Black Holes) but it falls short for describing gravity at smaller scales (atoms, particles).
@sturger No, evolution is both. Evolution is a framework supported by vast amounts of data which makes it a theory. Evolution is also something that has been observed, measured, and recorded in nature, making it a fact.
Why does every nature video have to be the site of an evolution vs. creationism debate? why does everything have to be looked at in those terms? go to The Amazing Atheist's channel and debate there why don't you.
This particular beetle has a relevance to New-Earth Creationists because they liken ALL dinosaurs to a creature called a Tannayn (dragon). The Bible verse describing the physical traits of these creatures claims they breathe fire. They unjustly argue that if a beetle can do it, a dinosaur can too, but the location of the "fire" dismantles that argument. In the beetle, the reaction occurs in the abdomen, and not the nasal cavity (which is basically a canal to the brain).
"The gland openings of some African bombardier beetles can swivel through 270o and thrust between the insect's legs so it can be discharged in all sorts of directions with considerable accuracy."
I'm theistic yet I also have a lot of faith in the presence of life on Mars or Europa in the form of microbes, algae, and other extremophiles. Other examples of precision design include the bumble-bee. It's supposed to be physically impossible for that fatso to fly. There's also a breed of rabbit that can genetically recognize a flying predator from its optic nerve (as opposed to cognitively recognize), hinting to creatures pre-programmed with knowledge about their enemies.
typical theistic reply, "life is too complicating to figure out".
the very reason science is here does not mean it will have all the answers in the universe readily available right away. you should know that science is a progression of knowledge, just because it's too complicating to understand now does not mean we won't figure it out later.
also, pre-programmed characteristics can be justified through evolution.
that's a bad ass beetle, like it's like a David and Goliath scene with that spider
OhJoyLOL 1 day ago
Evolution is a fool's folly. Evolution says I can put my seiko watch in a bag, pulverize it w/a hammer into dust, then shake the bag for a billion years, open the bag, and my watch will somehow form. How much more complex are we---and that bombardier beetle's explosive mechanism---than that watch? Only fools believe in evolution.
V67850 1 month ago
wow cool frog reaction
mrwhoiamorwhatever 1 month ago
whats weird about this bug is how its named the third largest aerospace company
ghettoperson257 1 month ago
you atheists make me sick. you all live in denial. Our God (even yours) will reckon with you.
gr33nm0rgan 2 months ago
@gr33nm0rgan Lol Africans.
craigcrawford1988 2 months ago
i'm not a african. africans are black twit.@craigcrawford1988
gr33nm0rgan 1 month ago
@gr33nm0rgan African : A native or inhabitant of Africa. What difference would it make anyway. Twit.
MrOvipare 1 month ago
@gr33nm0rgan Well then we can ask him some important questions, like why he's such a dick.
fatmikecj 1 month ago
your time will come brother, your time will cone...@fatmikecj
gr33nm0rgan 1 month ago
@gr33nm0rgan Too bad you live a sad life. A life in wich you do not take time to understand the true beauty of the world you were lucky to be brought in. Deny evolution, deny quantum mecanics : deny yourself.
MrOvipare 1 month ago
@gr33nm0rgan What's even funnier is that you don't even practice what you preach. You beleive in a religion that's supposed to be based on love and respect, yet you are arrogant : you speak in the name of god and curse others who do believe the powers of the christ.
MrOvipare 1 month ago
Can someone upload the whole vide?. Its dumb to upload a video that is so short in 2 pieces.
UTubeisSHIT523441 4 months ago
LOL! Poor froggie at the end! He was opening his mouth like "Argh! That was hot" or it tastes bad, or something. LOL I love froggies. :(
tall32guy 4 months ago
Frog: WOOOAAAHHHH!!! *Cough!!* *Cough!!* Cough!!*
Guerrillablackdog 6 months ago
fog got owned!
student1276 8 months ago
WE CAN'T EXPLAIN IT WITH EVOLUTION (at this moment in knowledge), THEREFORE INTELLIGENT DESIGN IS TRUE! NOPE, NOT CLOSE MINDED AT ALL, DERPDERP
Nauticus89 10 months ago
gives a whole new meaning to "silent but deadly"
gaburearu 10 months ago
Look up Horus and Jesus.
MrYouthinasia 10 months ago
All these arguments...
Unsurprisingly lots of cliche insults thrown at theists from atheists.
Yet I haven't seen a single explanation for the inexplicable mechanism of Bombardier through random mutations.
To atheists(anti-religious, whatever you are): You are the most religious group here, stop throwing around that word, its hypocritical. Insulting yourself isn't clever.
To religious doomsayers: You aren't going to convert anybody over youtube, don't waste your time.
Have a good day.
josh9294 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@josh9294 "Yet I haven't seen a single explanation for the inexplicable mechanism of Bombardier through random mutations." If you had tried to look it up just once in your life you would have found the explanation... do you expect the scientists to chase you down because it's so important to explain it to someone who obviously gives a shit about science?
UberTankred 9 months ago
Hah. Silly frog didn't pay attention in Biology :)
StuartG001 11 months ago
the frog was about to fire his lazaaarr
35fallen35 11 months ago
So these are basically the creepers of real life?
5uchtie 11 months ago
damm religions im a pastafarian
TekkReaper 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it's no doubt that God created all things in this universe.
But soon, God will destroy this earth and universe.
Judgment Day begins on May 21, 2011
wwwYoutubeCom/watch?v=0SVrlm4BXFM
wwwEBibleFellowshipCom/WeCanKnow/
wwwWorldEndsMay21Com
FamilyRadioCom
may God have mercy on us sinners!
WeCanKnowDottCom 1 year ago
@WeCanKnowDottCom
Get the fuck out with this crap
antiteista83 1 year ago
@WeCanKnowDottCom HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA, I do recall it saying IN THE BIBLE that only the heavenly father knows when the end will come you fucking twat.
Have fun being a mockery once that day passes.
xXTyroneBiggumsXx 11 months ago
@WeCanKnowDottCom ooh I'm so scared now... WAIT may 21!? I missed the judgement day? is that a bad thing?
smaug131 5 months ago
like a penis
armorhide406 1 year ago
Christianity is one of the newest religions on earth so why should it be believed surely the other religions would have more wisdom and truth?
But yeah that frog got owned :D
IHopeIGetThis 1 year ago
Don't mess around in this Bug's hood, homie
victorragingredlma1 1 year ago
LOL! the frog was like fuck man whatd you eat for breakfast
aurlis2012 1 year ago 4
More proof of God.
Trenaur 1 year ago
@Trenaur Or, yah know, the infinite, myriad, and beautiful results of evolution overtime. But don't let the evidence keep you from believing something for no reason at all.
joedillian 1 year ago
@joedillian There is no proof of that.
Trenaur 1 year ago
@Trenaur
*Dramatic news chair spin*
And on other news; Trenaur does not understand evolution. He has been reported of making very little effort to do so, despite significant amounts of explanations all around him. People with degrees in labcoats agree that there is little chance of him ever understanding it.
And now Marcus with the weather.
hellofraaance 1 year ago
@Trenaur
And again I have seemed to accidentally miss the part that proves God exists in a clip that lasts under 1 minute :(
DutchManticore 1 year ago
The frog looked like my son the day he sculled half a glass of vinegar because I told him it was apple juice.
Copsweet 1 year ago
Even more proof that Darwin was a douche, there is an architect......
EpicPremonition 1 year ago
@EpicPremonition Your comment is even more proof that you're stupid. Instead of having your head shoved so far up your ass that opening your eyes sees the interior of your colon and nothing else, pull it out and examine things without this assumption that what PEOPLE tell you the bible is saying, is what it means. You are one step removed even from christianity, because YOU don't understand the bible and let the ignorant who think they're wise tell you its meaning.the bible warns of this.
LFactorSA 4 months ago
That frog got the worst of it. His face was all twisted in disgust...lol
Rx7even 1 year ago
This beetle bug is the booty bomb!
PaulUmbarger 1 year ago
ooohh la la la how great it is being a frog. Oh! A tasty beetle for me? Let me just lap you right up then OH JESUS WHY ME WHY ME
atotheroh 1 year ago
TANKEEEEER!
kravcio 1 year ago
its like chargin ma lazhoar
PoepOpStokje 1 year ago
i think i just sae Jabba the Gut xD
Novaray10 1 year ago
lol you don't want to piss those things off, lest you really wish to get sprayed with some really bad-smelling, burning liquids...
Frostbite249 1 year ago
I want one of those. Be real handy for those, "Stop bugging me!" moments.
MzHellinahandbasket 1 year ago
Rofl the frog is like O_O >:-P after it gets sprayed
Havixus 1 year ago
frog got pwned
bantermelon 1 year ago 3
How the F*** can you people argue about religion/science on a video about a damn beetle?
I'm gonna start a buisness, make a house for people to argue in....and a website with topics to argue on.I'm gonna be so damn rich!
zoidbetag 1 year ago 8
i have heard that Satan and God had made up and they are friends now! ! ! !
jwhcv67 1 year ago
ROFL why is this marked thumbs down so much? Great comment.
Havixus 1 year ago
you people are stupid.he allowed hell to exist for punishment for people who had sinned against him.and he never created you to go to hell.he can forgive your sins when you confess it to him by praying.and the universe was not created in 7 days it was the earth.
pnoyjake1 1 year ago
@pnoyjake1
According to the Bible all was created in SIX days, not just the earth. The seventh day was a sabbath rest.
New International Version (©1984) Gen. 1:1
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."
Peace.
Jomammacita 1 year ago
@Jomammacita
Six days means six billion years.
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
That frog definitely wasn't expecting that LOL. Any insect that can make a frog do that is not to be messed with. I wonder where this bug's place in the food chain is.
oRuTRa45 1 year ago
lol @ comments
niknak1830 1 year ago
Oh jeez if wasps started squirting their poison like that I would be terrified.
TmsT 1 year ago 2
"Science?" Science proves nothing. For example, you think, " Oh, God didn't create water. Water is just Hydrogen and Oxygen." But just because you figured out HOW God made it, doesn't mean God didn't make it. Catch my drift? Read the Bible.
ryanboz46 2 years ago
@ryanboz46: Why don't you get the plague, yell at the sky, and beat yourself with a wooden board and see how far the Bible gets you with curing your illness, you religious nutjob... I'll take my science and anti-biotics that actually do something useful over your creationist bullshit anyday. Listen to the scientist, not the pastor!
AviationHero 2 years ago
@AviationHero "Listen to the scientist, not the pastor"
I think I'l listen to both. You know, blend them together.
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
@ryanboz46
You are quite literally, retarded. Science DOES prove things, unlike the Bible which just relies on faith, not facts. Enjoy your life of blind obedience.
hellokittiegay11 2 years ago
have you ever read the bible? just wondering because theyre are prophecies predicted and accomplished,that science cannot prove either.
79mistermischief 2 years ago
First off, "theyre are" means "they are are." Nice knowledge moron. Secondly, I have read the bible, seeing as how I am a minister.
hellokittiegay11 2 years ago
well while my grammer was incorrect "and accidental minister" i guess you skipped where it said not to judge someone right? moron? matthew 7:3--"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? minister these nuts in your mouth...now if you really want to discus scripture im not the average idiot..lets see what you really know "minister" hahahahahahah gay pussy!
79mistermischief 2 years ago
"I guess you skipped where it said not to judge someone right?" So you say that, then end your post with "gay pussy." Not only are you dumb, but hypocritical as well. As it says in Genesis 4:20--"Let he who respondeth to trolls be forever the one that sucketh the most cock." Amen.
hellokittiegay11 2 years ago
listen dick i never said i was christian or a minister...i know scripture..i was pointing it out to u...as for you i could care less what u think.. i wouldnt piss on u if u were on fire...
79mistermischief 2 years ago
I would hope you wouldn't pee on me regardless of the situation. I would put you out if you were on fire though, because it's the Christian thing to do.
hellokittiegay11 2 years ago
@hellokittiegay11
The Bible was written before the int4rwebs was born. It is not to be taken literally. Remember the book of Revelation's "OMG I SAW A LION THAT BREATHES FIRE AND A WASP WITH A WOMAN'S HAIR GO FLAP FLAP FLAP"?
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
And we should believe the bible because?
it was inspired by god?
the bible has to many contradictions to be gods word
and the old testament then?
god came back and told us he made some mistakes last time?
and if the universe was created in 7 days , how come its still expanding then?
if god is so high and mighty and all loving.
why does he allow hell to exist?
i was made by god so god created my way of thinking.
why would he create me just to be sent to hell in the end? it makes no sense
Lenniemcdirtbag 2 years ago
7 actual days just in fundamentalist denomination
Hell, sin, evil is not so much substance that is created. It is, or could be, im not totally sure, i wont claim to be, the abscence of gods presence in something. Just my opinion
Deathrune456 1 year ago
@Lenniemcdirtbag
7 days means 7 billion years, science has proven the old testament to be correct except for some parts, God has programmed the universe to expand, and the reason why God created hell is why he created us - he was bored.
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
@ryanboz46
God created us through sience :D! Coz he was bored :(.
TheSonOfDumb 1 year ago
@ryanboz46 @ryanboz46 The bible was written by men. How exactly does it prove that god exists, then?
If you assume what the bible says is true, then, maybe 10.000 years in the future, a crazy lunatic might find out somewhere a book describing the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" and decide it's the undebatable truth, and against claims that such beliefs were preposterous, he would simply say "it's all truth! It says in our marinated holy gospel!"
FeanorBR 1 year ago
@FeanorBR The amazing thing is 99% of those claiming these nonsense biblical truths in comments on youtube, are simply mirroring the words of bible "scholars", who even within the "scholarly" circles, disagree, some reconcile evolution (first cause / non directive and other methods) and some just ignore science. The biggest thing is, the bible warns (for the christian) against following blindly the words of the man who thinks himself wise enough to know what god means. Always forgotten
LFactorSA 4 months ago
@ryanboz46 Science also proves tons of things, because it works upon evidence and encourages multiple approaches as well as constant revision of content (something that is shunned by religion... gee I wonder why).
By the way, the computer you are using to spread your bullshit ideas? You have science to thank for, not your god.
I'm normally all up for personal beliefs, but don't try and mix them with science. Your church already hindered scientific progress in many areas in our past.
FeanorBR 1 year ago 2
@FeanorBR Thank you that there are atleast a few people with sense! I agree with you 100%. Religion has hindered our evolution pretty much and many people have died in the name of it.
BlackTiger112 1 year ago
what the fuck happened to the frog
fobsternd 2 years ago
LOL the frogs expression XD
MikuXP 2 years ago 3
@MikuXP Its mouth blistered. :P I'd love to dare a fundy to let that beetle to that to their eye. :P
tohidefromourways 1 year ago
Hahaha!, screw you mate!, i just got a mountain of documented EVIDENSE said by Evolution scientists that there is no actual proof for your made up HOAX of an "accepted theory", so stick that up your arse!!!, and i know God exists, what??!!, what do you kind of think you know we came from a cell, then a fish, then a lizard, than a monkey???, what!!!??.
Aheadstix85 2 years ago
Oy. Look up ERVs.
MorsmordreMaiden 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What??, thats exactly what your saying!!, evolution is just blind chance, and its impossibe, and God is not imaginary, i feel his presence all the time, so who the hell are you to say that hes fake!, have you ever felt him?, have you ever talked to him, you know nothing about God, but hes bigger than your pathetic little mind that thinks it knows it all can fathom, and i laugh at you. God is true power, and you will probly never understand that, then again no one really does understand that.
Aheadstix85 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Bombardier Beetle mind is bigger than your pathetic mind !
Why dont you study before saying that evolution is impossible?
Why dont you put your imagirary god inside your ass?
DonAllanDelon 2 years ago
it actually takes more faith to believe in a big bang theory /evolution..than it does to accept creationism..honestly..its like my throwing a stick of dynamite into a paper mill and getting the constitution.
79mistermischief 2 years ago
@79mistermischief you're a moron. evolution really isn't a 'random' series of events. Its actually factors and a series of events which we humans aren't exactly technologically ready/advanced to say what they are yet. My idea: keep learning. I think God made us to learn and be in awe at his wonders. Did you know eventually down the line you could say that humans and animals are made of star dust (all solid matter is made from it)?
tohidefromourways 1 year ago
@Aheadstix85
Just because YOU feel the presence of a god, it doesn't make that god exist beyond your mind. I could make up any imaginary creature and "talk" to it, and by your logic it would have to exist.
And there is far more proof for evolutionary theory than there is for any religious theory. Sure, both require some degree of faith, but at least science has structure. Religion just says "take my word for it, or I'll kill you."
Oh yeah... And work a bit on your spelling and punctuation.
Kramer390 2 years ago
Extremlely complex chemical reaction!!!!, not blind fucking chance!!!!!.
Aheadstix85 2 years ago
No one says it was blind chance. It certainly wasn't blinked into existence by your imaginary god.
TheDarkKnight987 2 years ago
The frog was sweet
bigboythief 2 years ago 2
From was saying OH FUCK NO BLARGHhhh
spaceorbison 2 years ago
hey it's the true assblaster (tremors 3 monster) dang mixmaster lol
billybass116 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In soviet Russia, bug spray YOU!
meteormanmike 2 years ago 76
@meteormanmike
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah =3
ackermanjeffery 1 year ago
I'd like to see an evolutionist explain how this thing evolved
getback9691 2 years ago
To tell you the truth, lots of evolutionists have already sutdied it and proposed quite convincing hypotheses. Their explanations are quite easy to find just by googling it.
The two substances involved in the so-called explosion (hydroquinone and hydrogen peroxide) are quite common in insects living organisms and do not explode spontaneously when in contact. The explosion only occurs when in contact with catalyst enzymes namely catalase and peroxidase, very common in many living organisms.
vhmunhoz 2 years ago 12
You are talking about C6H4(OH)2 and H2O2. The first one should be very toxic but the other is just water with two extra oxygen atoms. But i guess it will turn out to give a very bad smelly combination when you put them together. It seems the combination also have a blind effect.
The toxic effect is merely a long term thing (i think).
globe255 2 years ago
@globe255 You're an idiot.
Grey13Human 5 months ago
@Grey13Human You forgot to say we are two of that kind.
globe255 5 months ago
@vhmunhoz would you please redirect me to some papers refering to this topic??? Thank you.
gramonc 8 months ago
@vhmunhoz i googled and googled and there were no explanations to explain how these common chemicals came together to work in harmony simultaneously. I also failed to find the mechanism that allowed the DNA to be written for the construction of the beetle. The emperor has no clothes, buddy.
philackey 5 months ago
@philackey Both hydrogen peroxide and various kinds of quinones are used for a great variety of body chemistry functions, both in humans as well as in many other living creatures.
The bombardier beetle's ancestors simply utilized chemicals that already happened to be around for different uses. That's often how evolution works.
kimpeater1 4 months ago
@kimpeater1 Haha that's gotta be the stupidest comment I've ever read. Long ago, this beetle decided "hey, I'm going to mix these two highly explosive chemicals together, shoot them out of these two tubes that don't exist yet, and keep this frog from eating me"? Every part of this defense has to be perfectly formed before it can work. If not, the beetle blows itself up and doesn't pass on it's genes. And I would love to use chemicals in my body voluntarily, because that's possible or something.
wasdare32 4 months ago
@wasdare32 No beetle ever made a conscious decision to perform this defense mechanism. Just as no human consciously calculates the physics involved in catching a ball.
The beetle's ancestor contained a genetic mutation that allowed it to defend itself. This crude version was probably not as powerful, accurate, or otherwise as effective. In all likelihood it was possibly semi-suicidal as well. It doesn't need to be perfect at first; 1% of a gun is still better than no gun at all.
kimpeater1 4 months ago
These chemicals are not reactive and thus not harmful to the beetle until they are oxidized, which is performed by separate enzymes (catalase and peroxidase in this case).
kimpeater1 4 months ago
@kimpeater1 Exactly. You expect me to believe that these enzymes just happened to evolve in this beetle's body? Everything has to be kept separate until it's ready to be used, otherwise the beetle blows itself up. If one part of the system didn't work, it's completely useless.
wasdare32 4 months ago
@wasdare32 LOL you clearly know nothing about chemistry or evolution.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 That's the answer I always get when someone has no answer themselves. Why comment if you have no argument? An animal doesn't have voluntary control over the chemicals in it's body. I can't separate the oxygen in my blood with the hemoglobin and use the oxygen with hydrogen to make water if my body starts getting dehydrated. But that's what evolutionist say happened to this beetle when it developed the ability to use hydrogen peroxide and catalase.
wasdare32 3 months ago
@wasdare32 Why does the beetle need to consciously be in control of it? As these beetles evolved they weren't consciously trying to get this end result. Your analogy of oxygen and hemoglobin is ridiculous and has nothing to do with these beetles. Once again, go read a book on evolution or chemistry and get back to me.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 You're a moron. Just tell everyone to read something if you run out of arguments. School textbooks still print the evolution of horses as linear even though over 50 years ago evolutionists agreed that it was more of a tree shape. Books aren't always right. Science constantly changes and old facts are deemed completely false. I'm in college pursuing a Ph.D in chemical engineering so I know my stuff. Everyone assumes that if you don't believe in evolution then you're against all science.
wasdare32 3 months ago
@wasdare32 If you don't ACCEPT evolution(There is no belief involved, you either accept or deny facts. Evolution is a fact.) then its pretty hard for any rational person to think you'd accpet any scientific facts. If you don't accept evolution then why do you accept gravity? There's more data about evolution and we understand how it works better than we understand how gravity works.
Please explain how the evolution of the horse is tree shaped??? What does that even mean???
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 Actually there's very few things in science that are "fact". I know that very well. Evolution is a THEORY, that's why it's called the THEORY OF EVOLUTION. Don't tell me it's a fact when even the believers know it's not fact. We could sit here and argue about evolution because it hasn't been proven. It's been proven that it's possible and even that it might be more likely than any other theory, but it's not 100% true. I don't believe anything unless I have proof, science included.
wasdare32 3 months ago
@wasdare32 "even the believers know it's not fact"
Anyone who studies evolution or even general science will disagree. Scientists know trillions of facts, even in a narrow field of study. Facts are data, that's almost all information in science. Theories encompass many laws and facts. One of the facts that the theory of evolution contains is the FACT that evolution is true. Any scientist in a related field will agree. Dozens of scientific disciplines require evolution to be true just to exist.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 It wouldn't be a theory if it was completely true. Law of biogenesis is a LAW. That means that it's been proven true. Same with law of thermodynamics and newton's laws. Evolution is a THEORY, which is far from making it true. Just because we've found some similar looking fossils in the ground doesn't mean the animals were related at all. Mosquitoes and flies are two different species not related at all. Yet if we find two similar looking fossils people want to call them missing links.
wasdare32 3 months ago
@wasdare32 I suggest you go look up what a scientific theory is. You're just absolutely wrong. Theories is science cover much more that laws do. The theory of evolution is a fact. Try asking a scientist.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 Theory is theory not fact, some theories are highly probable, such as evolution but not fact. I'm a scientist.
sturger 3 months ago
@sturger If you really were a scientist then you'd know the difference.
A theory can also be a fact, like evolution.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 "As used in science, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Any scientific theory must be based on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A clear distinction needs to be made between facts (things which can be observed and/or measured) and theories (explanations which correlate and interpret the facts."
sturger 3 months ago
@sturger Yes exactly.
By that definition evolution is a theory and a fact.
Case closed.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 No evolution is a theory based on facts
sturger 3 months ago
@sturger No, evolution is both. Evolution is a framework supported by vast amounts of data which makes it a theory. Evolution is also something that has been observed, measured, and recorded in nature, making it a fact.
jib1000 3 months ago
@jib1000 A theory cannot also be a fact to a scientist. We have theories like evolution and gravitation which are so robust that we can use them as a basis for other experiments and observations and we consider them as facts, but a theory can never officially be true -- it just hasn't been disproven yet.
The distinction that you're looking for is that the BASIS of theories like evolution and gravitation are true, but their MECHANISMS are theoretical.
And I am also a scientist.
fdssg 2 months ago
@fdssg Well sadly you're wrong. Type "evolution is a fact and a theory" into YT! search and watch a bit.
Almost any evolutionary biologist (or someone in a feild related to evolution) will tell you its both.
A lot of scientists are in print also saying the same thing.
Try looking it up.
jib1000 2 months ago
@fdssg Gravitation is very poorly understood as a mecanism in general. (We describe how it works at the cosmic scale and the macrometric scale, but we don't have anything solid for "the big picture" (considering the quantum scaler gravitation)
I am also a scientist.
MrOvipare 1 month ago
@MrOvipare I am not a scientist, so forgive me for probably asking something stupid :p Isn't the theory of relativity what is used for a better understanding of what is usually called gravity, or am I being confused?
Piatasify 2 weeks ago
@Piatasify What you are asking is not stupid at all! "Special relativity" mainly concerns stuff hapenning when you approach speed of light and all. "General Relativity" like you said is a better explanation for gravity than Newton's theory. It is more precise and predicts thing that Newton's theory could not explain (i.e. Black Holes) but it falls short for describing gravity at smaller scales (atoms, particles).
MrOvipare 6 days ago
@MrOvipare cool, gotcha.
Piatasify 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sturger No, evolution is both. Evolution is a framework supported by vast amounts of data which makes it a theory. Evolution is also something that has been observed, measured, and recorded in nature, making it a fact.
jib1000 3 months ago
@wasdare32
wasdare32 3 months ago
Why does every nature video have to be the site of an evolution vs. creationism debate? why does everything have to be looked at in those terms? go to The Amazing Atheist's channel and debate there why don't you.
dukeduck 2 years ago
This particular beetle has a relevance to New-Earth Creationists because they liken ALL dinosaurs to a creature called a Tannayn (dragon). The Bible verse describing the physical traits of these creatures claims they breathe fire. They unjustly argue that if a beetle can do it, a dinosaur can too, but the location of the "fire" dismantles that argument. In the beetle, the reaction occurs in the abdomen, and not the nasal cavity (which is basically a canal to the brain).
But i do agree w/ you.
Logicalanalysis 1 year ago
me too man. Was thinking thesame thing too
you see how they quickly give you thumbs down because of their frustration.
I hope to get my thumbs down too. LOL
shayneby 2 years ago 2
Yea, I guess debating evolution is a bit of a sore subject around here.
getback9691 2 years ago
it's like eating at tacobell, but that only hurts you.
trustthewater 2 years ago
Ha. The frog.
CoralineVoorhees 2 years ago
hahahahaahah the frogs face looked like HOLY SHIT
krowXdoom 2 years ago 72
@krowXdoom ROFL!!
pikudao 1 year ago
@krowXdoom fucking made my day xD
beaslyboy 1 year ago
@krowXdoom Hes was constipated when he said that.
MegaGhidorah 10 months ago
@krowXdoom I can already hear skippy calling for fox
akogi1987 8 months ago
@krowXdoom I can already hear slippy calling for fox
akogi1987 8 months ago
Lol poor frog, but that spider was fucking huge! I wonder what it would feel like to get sprayed by one of these guys...
vexusdylan 2 years ago
when I was seven I was stung by a black one of these when I was visiting North Carlolina. It burned like hell and none of the adults belived me.
cloudmusic01 2 years ago
its cut vid :/ longer version is better, this one is crap
7BeAsT9 2 years ago
Wow that frog was seriously hurt!! Good defense!! thats the equivalent of us peeing on a T-Rex and scaring it away
ORACLE063 2 years ago
Poor froggie, got his lil tongue singed :(
savagepug 2 years ago 3
Dragon.
petenerk 2 years ago
"drives them away"
Yeah I sure the hell it does. That Frog looked like it was sinking into shock.
Xtro2005 2 years ago 2
Nigel Marven rocks.
ladymeserole 2 years ago
I want one of those as a pet!
BugChampion 2 years ago
I can't believe it
hdelicious 2 years ago
That frog got served.
Ralphomon 2 years ago
i thought it was called a bombadeer beatle because it blew up when it died
aliedesuacido 2 years ago
lol
dj10king 2 years ago
haha, the frog...
johnnymagic10 2 years ago
0:32 pwned
tetavo 2 years ago 4
"what? you threatening me? i'll superfart you away"
carlosewm 2 years ago 5
lololoolololol
obsessedvampstalker 2 years ago
And they can AIM! Check this:
"The gland openings of some African bombardier beetles can swivel through 270o and thrust between the insect's legs so it can be discharged in all sorts of directions with considerable accuracy."
Aaaaahhhh!!!!!!
trinitychiq 2 years ago 4
Can Dermestes lardarius beetle be killed with hot water?
kiddmuscle 2 years ago
no. it ist a sort of chemical warfar... read: wikipedia Bombardier_beetle
allescaspar 2 years ago
What about black carpet beetle larvae?
kiddmuscle 2 years ago
Pepper Spray huh..
odhit 3 years ago
that frog was hilarious, it was like 'AW SHIT NAW FUCKFUCKFUCK'
TriggerHappyD 3 years ago 13
ha ha
obsessedvampstalker 2 years ago
I do research. And I do respect your views. I understand them.
I just don't agree with them.
shdowops 3 years ago
I don't think animals can read the "documents". So how did THEY learn it?
shdowops 3 years ago
dude if i could spray acid outa my ass
by god life would be complete
apple1231230 3 years ago 3
lol
ISinisterI 3 years ago
true...it would so come in handy if i ever had to go to jail and someone tried making me their prison bitch.
SURPRISE ASSHOLE!!!
kaliamalia 3 years ago 8
amen apple
trinitychiq 2 years ago
I'm theistic yet I also have a lot of faith in the presence of life on Mars or Europa in the form of microbes, algae, and other extremophiles. Other examples of precision design include the bumble-bee. It's supposed to be physically impossible for that fatso to fly. There's also a breed of rabbit that can genetically recognize a flying predator from its optic nerve (as opposed to cognitively recognize), hinting to creatures pre-programmed with knowledge about their enemies.
person582 3 years ago
typical theistic reply, "life is too complicating to figure out".
the very reason science is here does not mean it will have all the answers in the universe readily available right away. you should know that science is a progression of knowledge, just because it's too complicating to understand now does not mean we won't figure it out later.
also, pre-programmed characteristics can be justified through evolution.
yoops 3 years ago 2
Really?! Where did those pre-programmed characteristics begin?
shdowops 3 years ago