Added: 2 years ago
From: TopGunMilitary
Views: 143,986
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (283)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So this is what an air to air battle looks like in real life. Everything is their, they even got the AWACS.

  • This vid is off USS Nimitz, early 1980's showing the Jolly Rogers of VF-84. This event you speak of also took place in August 1981 with VF-41off USS Nimitz splashing two migs while conducting a missile excersize with USS Forrestall in the Gulf of Sidra, Ghadaffy's infamous "Line of Death" water claim was rejected.

    Trust me, I know

  • GOTTA LOVE AFV,,, what people Air Force Videos not Americas Funnest Home videos.

  • Tomcat to me personaly one of the best fighter-planes ever.

  • @Mjbrutus1991: Yeah, absolutely! The F-14 ( and of course their pilots ) did their job very very well! Great Fighter!

  • @TankNutJohn89

    we in croatia have old mig-s 21 they are old and usless but still we are using them , USA has offered to us f-16 for free i think but again we dont have money to modernize them so now we still have stupid old mig-s.

  • @Mjbrutus1991: The MiG-21 is a great Fighter, but clearly outdated. In Serbia we have shot down newer MiG-29's without any problems. The F-16 is a great Fighter, it isn't even expensive, 25 other airforces uses them too. The F-16D costs 19 million $, compared to the 5th Generation F-22 with 160 Million $ it's really cheap. I would like if Croatia would buy our new F-16Viper!

  • Iran talks a lot but I bet you by the end of the first day of battle with them we will have a kill ratio of 8:1. The Iranian pilots probably study old Soviet tactics. I say we steal those Tomcats back and bring them back into service by upgrading them. The irony would be so sweet.

  • @mower2008 I Agree, let take over those Tomcats away from iranian hands

  • @mower2008: The USAF should use F-22's to down those iranian bogey's. But F-15's are enough! They can bomb & they can fight in the air, GO USAF!

  • hey fox that frak em up

    

  • IRAN TAKE NOTE, you may have the tomcat but now its the Mig-23 to our new aircraft

  • 17 people went killed by a f-14 tomcat

  • Falcon 4.0 Menu Radio Chatter,I'll always remember that.If you know what I'm talking about then I guess you've played Falcon 4.0,you're awesome.

  • WTF? Red tail at 6:07. Fake remade battle footage! :P

  • F/A 14 tomcat.JOGER Sq ........

  • Who filmed this video? Superman with a camera?

  • @Communist654 yeah....side job...:D

  • Chuck Norris could do that with a umbrella and two stones. 

  • Oh and one more thing...

    JOLLY ROGER TOMCATS!

    YARR MATEYYYYY, RULE THE SEAS!!!

  • All the F-14 needed was a glass cockpit, fly-by-wire, and supercruise...then it would be the most capable fighter ever made because its versatility, thanks to the AIM-54 which was the best missile in the West, are unmatched by other fighters except maybe the flanker because it also had a super long-range missile. Combine that with its speed and naval capability and you get arguably the finest interceptor around. Even with a fighter escort hostile bombers would be screwed thanks to the phoenix.

  • @Spjungen YEAH TOO BAD AIM-54 IS NO LONGER USED IN US THEY ARE GOING TO REGRET NOT HAVING THEM SOME DAY

  • A Tomcat manőverező légiharcban sosem számított nagyágyúnak. BVR az erőssége.

  • I love how they are VF-84 Tomcats but at 4:08 it shows a pilot from VF-1.

  • Kenny Loggins: DANGER ZONE

  • 1:12 what plane is that?

  • @ninjadude92584 AWAC

  • @erh7771 Hawkeye

  • @erh7771 thanks!

  • @ninjadude92584 E-2c Hawkeye

  • The F-14, as well as the A-6 was eventually replaced by versions of the F-18. The F-18 was scheduled to be replaced either by Naval versions of the F-22 or the F-35. Has the F-22 been cancelled (please cite source and link)? What is the fate of the F-35? No bashing, plz, we're all friends here :)

  • @istarianjinsama F-35C is all screwed up because of a problem with the placement of the tailhook, so it can't land on carriers unless it has a major fix(apparently the hook cant be moved without majorly redoing the design). I'm not sure about the navalized f-22 but I think it's been dropped as an idea

  • @619stanley Damn! just when my Locheed Martin stock was paying good dividends

  • @istarianjinsama navalize F-22 was cancelled. The Super Hornet acts as a stop-gap between the retiring F-18A/C and supplement for the F-35C.

  • @istarianjinsama I meant F-18A/C will retire in the next decade.

  • JFK = THREDIIDAE > LACTRODECTUS HESPERUS

  • The info says the F-14 was replaced in the Navy by the F-22 Raptor. Is this correct? Isn't the F/A-18 Super Hornet its replacement? I thought the F-22 was exclusive to the Air Force.

  • @khasperg No, that is not correct. They F-14 is being replaced by the F-18 Super Hornet. You are correct when you said the F-22 is exclusive to the Air Force.

  • "Maneuverable" uhhhh nope. It turned like a brick, very low instantaneous capability. Decent sustained turn due to good power, and it accelerated very well. But could not turn worth a darn... numerous were confirmed shot down in the Iran-Iraq war by IRIAF F-14s' it was no contest. by AIM-54, AIM-7 and AIM-9. Iraq was actually quite disapointed with the MiG-23 against the IRAIF F-14's it was assumed that it was the answer to the F-14 superiority but not to be.

  • Best fighter jet ever.

  • The MiG-23 is not that bad of a fighter. The Later versions, like the MLD, had a decent radar and could fit good missiles. When MiG-23 practiced vs F-16 it was found that the F-16 pilots found the MiG-23 surprisingly maneuverable.

  • roger that, jihad is down, jihad is down, returning to base over, hehehe

  • @homer30 dawg what do you meen, none of those rag heads have jets, they ride camels into battle

  • ha-ha this is fake, 5:58 its not MIG-23 its a MIG-15 or "кукурузник"

  • Mig 23 is an inferior aircraft compare to F14 but it still is not a bad aircraft. During Angola-South Africa war, a Mig 23 flown by a cuban pilot shot down a Mirage F1 using rader guided missile while head on approach. By hearing these distances within 20 miles Mig can def lock on F14s and could have fire. I don't know the reason they didn't until within 10 mile distance.

  • no this was when the navy was badass becuase they had the F-14 still

  • Did anyone know what the MiGs were doing there?

  • @HeX4869 What were the migs doing? Patroling their borders! WTF was the US navy doing there? Intimidating Lybia like the criminals they are! BTW this pilot is a fucking badass lol.... when he says "centering up the T, nose u" the other dude is like "hold on a minute now"! Then when he fires "fox 1, fox 1" the other dude is like "OHH Jesus" you just started a fucking war LOL... this shit is so funny, except that one of the lybian pilots morted :(

  • @lastboyofsiberspace

    То что это подделка видео видно ,во первых Миг-23 с блоками НУРС,и надо быть идиотом чтобы вступать в бой против ракет,все равно что с ножиком против пулемёта.

    Видио Миг-23 снято не над Ливией а в средней полосе России

  • Haji pilots got pwned.

  • I'm pretty sure the F-22 is filling in the retirement of the F-15 instead of the F-14 because the US variant of the F-14 was for the US navy and the F-22 is not in service with the US Navy

  • Wait... so the US Navy locked the MiGs, whom then locked the Navy back and tousled with them for awhile without firing anything, so the Navy blew them up? WTF?

  • "Snort" Snodgrass was engaged with a mig29 during the cold war. he said he regrets not shooting it down. F-14>Mig29. What a shame budget cuts and politics killed the Tomcat. The greatest Fighter of all time.

  • @233monte Better jets are around and we have them (F-22, F-35, and "apparently" the Super Hornet), but no jet will ever have what the F-14 had.

  • @lastboyofsiberspace why, the mig23 was launched at the same time the F14 was launched, the mig 29 was first launched 13years after these two, even the prupose, the top speed and other technical data of the mig23 and f14 are pretty similar, i see no reason why these two shouldnt be compared.

  • The only courageous acts of Pakistani Army was the rape of several thousand Bangladeshi Muslim women, as they were not muslim enough, as only those who speak Urdu were true muslims. I say, call of the war on terror, let them exterminate each other, as they try to prove their Arab masters, who the true muslim is -:)

  • The result would have been very different if the pilots sitting in the Mig-23 were Indians. The stunning victories of F-15s and F-16s and I really respect these machines and the pilots who fly them, were all against muslims who are pathetic warriors. The IAF Gnats whipped the state-of-the-art Sabre jets of the Pakistani AF, right, left and centre, some of them killing 3,4 and even 5 of them single handedly in the dogfights. Our infantry also whipped state-of-the-art Patton tanks 100 of them easi

  • The info portion under the video is incorrect. The Raptor is an Air Force jet, the Superhornet fills the Tomcat's "shoes".

  • @lastboyofsiberspace I would still go with the Tomcat on that, the Fulcrum is still a worthy opponent though, unlike the Flogger.

  • Don't you love the sound of those AIMs?

  • @lastboyofsiberspace I think its not necessarily to be Russian. Vietnamese pilots with only MiG-17 could shoot down F-104 and F-4. Arabian are more talented as terrorists and beating women.

  • gagasan 1 asean

    kedaulatan islam

    keperihatinan rakyat

    bahasa jawi

    1 bahasa

    1 nusantara

  • @lastboyofsiberspace If a russian ace flew the Su-22 and not a dumb arab maybe the F-14 would have lost.

  • those airplanes remind me of my Gijoe's F14 replica back to the 80's

  • love Jolly Rogers squad !

  • video is shit.first destroyed airplan is mig 17 or 15 and its older video.part where mig 23's are is above some forest,not libya,and it isn't a dogfight at all

  • @korajbih You pickle head, The whole video is just cuts of the F-14 and other aircraft. You really think modern aircraft fly that close in a fight. Hell they would be 10k feet apart and not even see each other. The old days of a wingman being close is long gone!

  • Mig-23 haha ...what a pathetic russian piece of shit.

  • @ViciousCritique

    23 Is ok, but F-14 does have it's advantages.

    Being these are export Libyan models, they are not as capable as the Soviet/Russian ones

  • Great video!!  Just one question though-- didn't the F-18 replace the F-14?

  • Ребята,не сложно сбить безоружный миг-23,подделка и достаточно грубая.

  • @stranik555 I know, right?

  • @lastboyofsiberspace Maybe your confused. This is not a fake battle which is why your saying it is a bad comparison. This was an actual event that occured over the ocean in which the Navy were forced to shoot down Migs in an air to air battle.

  • @lastboyofsiberspace Whats your point. When this fight occured it was f-14s vs migs. 

  • @lastboyofsiberspace This is not a comparison. This is what happened.

  • @coinageboy What would you do? How do you know their intentions?

  • @coinageboy You're carring a gun approaching a hostile guy who also has a gun, you aim your gun. What'd you expect? For the other guy to wait for you to shoot him? Lay off the pipe.

  • @coinageboy the Libyan clowns broke the exclusion zone declared for our carriers. We don't reimburse Arabs for losses caused by their own stupidity.

    GOD BLESS THE USA/CSA!!

  • @coinageboy Pilots of the MIG's ejected and were safe.

  • stupid video with almost  7 minutes of emptyness...

  • @Naviatik Our you kidding. I was on the edge of my seat. Its all about the communications as explained at the begging of the video. The actual video of the jets is just to help you visualize in your mind what was going on. There's a reason only 10 people put dislikes on this video. It's awesome.

  • @nimaside disagree. it is not Tomcat vs Flogger dogfight video ... Sorry, i supposed to find something useful, but failed. The visualisation is about nothing, here on youtube you can find tons of videos, which really can show you SOMETHING. This is just my opinion and you can disagree, i understand it. ;)

  • what were the migs doing?

  • this is when the us navy was badass.. now its all politically correct

  • @RunAwayFromObesity What? What are you talking about?

  • @RunAwayFromObesity

    The US navy will still fuck its enemies up. Count on it.

  • @lastboyofsiberspace Agreed..

    

  • 5:58......that's not a mig-23

  • @Fourteen88SoCal

    Probably an old F-86 or FJ-1 Fury drone.

    You also can see an F-14 in DACT with a crusader (probably a F-8J).

    A lot of these documentaries from the 80s and 90s were made with cobbled together military training and exercise films.

    The only real footage is at the end, with the actual gun camera footage from the Libyan Mig-23 shootdown.

  • @coinageboy ...you're right...

  • This is the vf-84 jolly Rogers squadron right?

  • @aitkensE04xXxRecon

    Yes, this video is from the 1980's Carrier air wing 8 off USS Nimitz, VF-84 had the baddest colors

  • I love the F 14, However the F-15 Eagle has a perfect fighting record.

    When the F-15's are in there air , there will be no other planes in the sky, they won't even bother , they know they will lose.

    It is a shame the F-15 is not in service in the US anymore,

  • @HesTNTonPMS

    It was the same way with the F-14 Tomcat that I why it has such a small kill record because most enemy planes would turn away than stay for a conflict with a plane that can kill them from over 50+ miles away.

  • @HesTNTonPMS The F-15 is still in service. I assume you meant the F-14, which was retired due to cost of operation.

  • its a fake

  • Always loved the Sqaudron emblem..can anyone tell me the name of this sqaudron? and if they still currently exist?

  • @RFKFANTS67

    The F-14 squadron shown in the film was mainly VF-84 (Jolly Rodgers) with some VF-211 (Fighting Checkmates) footage mixed in.

    VF-84 was disestablished in the 1990s; however, VF-103 (the Sluggers) picked up the name and the emblem (skull and cross bones).

    Both VF-103 (now called the Jolly Rodgers) and VF-211 fly the F-18 Super Hornet. They have taken on the squadron designator "VFA" respectfully.

    FYI: Also think there was a Shot of VF-101 mixed in there somewhere.

  • probably the best dogfight i've seen on youtube. Cool video.

  • Good Job pilots!

  • Anytime baby!

  • I say, why don't they call the F-35 F/A 35? I thought the A was for strike fighters for both ground and air like the F/A 18?

  • @TheHm3 ya i have thought that to but i don't know why

  • @TheHm3 Personally, I think the F/A designation never really made sense. In this day and age there are few fighters that aren't just as capable in the strike / ground attack role, so the A part in the F/A is really kind of redundant.

  • time move 5:58, it is not lower profile MIG 23. this movie is hollywood :)

  • It says the Kennedy, but the Cats they show with the skull and Bones are Nimitz based Jolly Rogers right? I know it's not the actual film but innacurate there I believe.

  • they should've brought back a few f-14 in the new libyan conflict, just for the lulz/nostalgia. 

  • is there a single seated version of the f-14

  • @zerox42100 no

  • @zerox42100 nope

  • @zerox42100 you might be thinking of the f18 which is a single seater but it can seat 2 aswell

  • tomcats murder all!

  • thing is... the Tomcat could have locked on fired, and killed the migs from SSSSSOOOOO much farther out. long range indeed. awesome aircraft.

  • @thestrokeds10 Maybe, if it carries the AIM-54 Phoenix, but I'm not sure the F-14s always went up with a loadout of AIM-54s. The other available air-to-air missiles (AIM-7 Sparrow / AIM-9 Sidewinder) are all relatively short-ranged (< 15 N.M.).

  • Just need those vortex trusters on the F-14 . Take F-14 today and improve on its engines and avoinics . it would be TOP GUN. F-14 was inService back in the lates 70's alot you were not even born. To much about being invasible to radar and not on performance. i can put cloaking device that will make your plane invisable for $100

  • @BBEEAANN1 Your data are simply not correct. :) For Mig-29 109m/s is an average rate of climb from 0 to 6000m. You think F-14 can do better? :) Let's see: F-14 33100kg, trust 2x93kN(with truster); Mig-29 18480kg trust: 81,4kN(with truster). No plane climbs on a constant rate. :) Don't take it personaly, I do not want to get into some kind of flame war.

  • @BBEEAANN1 Mig-29 can gain altitude much faster then f-14 and has better acceleration. Mig-29 can easily outturn F-14. Remember, that mig-29 was made to face F-15. F-14 has a better radar and better long range load, Mig-29 is better in dogfight and has better heat seeking missiles. Both are great planes. Well, now we must fly f-16... Nobody knows what those planes can really do because those are always in repair. Now we're equipping few remaining mig's 29 with NATO (mostly US) avionics...

  • @mitgat not really. the power to weight of the 14 is freakin awesome. putting out between 50-60k in burner.

  • @thestrokeds10 F-14 trust/weight ratio 0.78(0.88 at the best), Mig 29 trust/weight ratio 1.1. Mig 29 afterburner is also much more efficient (but it drains fuel tanks very quickly). Just check servicing manuals for both planes. ;) I'm quite familiar with 29s because I've worked with them. ;) But if you want to live in a dream world - your choice. :)

    F-14 is my favorite plane even if it's not the best ever. ;)

  • The 1st incident took place in 1981 in the Gulf,long before the JFK incident in 1989.

  • Get some America. Get some ur to narow minded mohamed a joke lmfao ramadon a joke we wiil shot u down. US is tha best ever

  • U S love em risked ther livives againt camel jokies n they lose lmfao their a joke U S gots them all the way

  • the good old days

  • they should show this on mtv

    i want to see the reactions of people

  • Not a nice propaganda.

  • When Tomcats fly, Migs die....  ;)

  • @TheChristianRight09

    Why don't you ask them to try trained russ pilot, not the untrained libyans

  • @chineseKGB i was thinking more about Serbia in the 90s.....  ;)

  • @chineseKGB why would they fight Russians? They are not enemies so get you're facts before you start talking shit

  • @chineseKGB you do know they crossed trained everyone in Fallon right?? trained and untrained quite a few countries come there to train. last time i was there, it was Canada and Britain.

  • This video is bullshit.. the Mig's are Russian and landscape behind them is Europe or somewhere else.. but surely not see or desert like Lybia.. suck!

  • @TheVeneth There have been two incidents of Tomcats shooting down libyian fighters, one with MIG 23s and One with SU22s

  • @TheVeneth its a dramazitation, they didnt have the actual footage of the lybian migs so they added file footage just for demenstration.

  • @chaosad09 in other words, this is pile of BS propaganda!!!!

  • What soviet mig-23ml do in this video?  )))

  • Jolly Rogers

  • I was a green shirt in V2 Division on the Flight deck of big John when this went down.

  • Do all the people who worked on Tomcats retire or get transfered to another fighterjet program. I guess there would of been so many people involved. 20 years ago now, do people normally stay that long in the military?

  • @detectiveinspekta I'm sure the Naval personal were transferred to Hornet or other Naval Air Assets.

  • f 14 of the "jolly roger" squadron are awesome!!!! most beautifull fighter in the world.

  • this is a lesson that air operation depend on electronic support and fighter electronics not only on flaying platform.

  • @Biogem369 An F-111 has never downed an enemy aircraft in combat. The closest an F-111 has come to a kill, is when an EF-111 was being chased by an Iraqi Mirage F-1 on the opening night of Desert Storm. While chasing the EF-111, the Mirage ran himself into the ground, but the EF pilots were given credit for the kill, even though they have ZERO offensive weapons aboard. I'm well versed on the history of the Aardvark, trust me.

  • @Biogem369 Oh yeah true, I forgot -.-

  • @Biogem369 Yeah lmao looks more like a Mig21

  • In this video, the F-14 dosent look too agile.

  • @dino312989 the F-14's top attribute where more so speed, radar, and weapons. but at the same time, pilots had to learn things incase they were forced into a close air fight.

  • @thestrokeds10 This is true. 

  • What is Fox 1, 2, or 3 mean?

  • @dino312989 Fox 1 is radar guided missile that depends on either complete or assisted radar guidance from the aircraft it is being launched from ie. AIM-150 Advanced Medium Range Air to Airm Missile (AMRAAM). Fox 2 is a IR (heat seaking) missile i.e. AIM-9 Sidewinder. Fox 3 is a long range air to air missile that has its own self guiding radar i.e. AIM-54 Phoenix (also, Fox 3 is currently being updated to classify the AMRAAM as the Phoenix is no longer in development). Hope this helped.

  • @AeroSharkTech Thanks a lot. Are you in the airforce or in the navy or something?

  • @dino312989 Glad I could help. I was in the Israeli Air Force for six years. I flew F-16s and ended up falling in love with them (but as a kid the Tomcat was always my favorite even though we didn't have any). Today I'm a contractor for US and Israeli aerospace firms. But hell, I just plain love to fly anything I can get my hands on! Anytime Baby!!

  • @AeroSharkTech O.o Cool. Wait what do you mean there werent any F-14

    's around? Couldnt you order one or something?

  • @dino312989 F-14s did not suit Isreal's mission. The F-14 is great at BVR long range engagement. And in our case, too good. Because Isreal is a very small country that borders several other countries we do our best to keep air to air combat within visual range. The last thing we want is a stray missile flying off into a bordering nation's airspace chasing after a commercial liner. Also the F-14 was too costly to operate. The F-15 was the logical decision considering the circumstances.

  • @AeroSharkTech Why not send a carrier over there? Is there no waters over there? They could have send one of those Nuclear Aircraft Carriers over there!

  • old school vs old school.

  • Powerful AWG-9 yes! Phoenix missile NO. 2 Sparrows & 1 Sidewinder were used if I recall correctly.

  • Comment removed

  • @maxxbad17 the Heads Up Display

  • who's filming the migs ?

  • The only Mig that could have taken on the Tomcat would have been the Mig 31 Firefox from the movie. haha that doesn't even exist so I guess that narrows it down to who wins by default.

  • @vfIskullangel Mig-29 could have taken F-14, especially at a range of heat seeking missles/cannons. Both are very good planes. Both need skilled pilots. Mig-29 is climbing faster then F-14, it has better acceleration and is more agile + it has better heat seeking missles. Know your enemy. Poland had Mig-29s, now we have F-16s and not everything in US produced planes is better.

  • @mitgat But which one has a better record? You know the F-14 is pretty much eactly the same as the F-15 and the F-15 dominated the Mig-29, so has the F-16, F-18 and even the Su-27. The Mig 29 is all hype but not a very positive record so far. The Mig 29 could have taken on the F-4, F-105 and F-5 but thats it and the answer to that has been solved.

  • @vfIskullangel lol f-4 stood no chance with mig 21 in close combat and there,s open caLL of one of the russian test pilots to american pilots stateing that he will take down any american airplane with his mig29 no answear so far.....

  • @misio310 The Mig29 is a joke.

  • @misio310 In reality, all but three of the MiG-21s shot down in the Vietnam War were shot down WVR, mostly by AIM-9 sidewinder. Another 9 via guns. You should understand that MiG-21s were used sparingly during the war. They preferred shoot and scoot tactics and would rarely stick around to continue the engagements with the F-4s and F-8s. The MiG-21, like the MiG-17 could NOT outurn either aircraft at speeds higher than 500kts, nor could they outclimb them. Only 6 MiG-21s survived the war.

  • @vfIskullangel I don't want to be rude or anything, but when it comes to F-15 vs Su-27... well F-15 would be in defence. Su-27 is a killer, good that you have F-22 now. From all fighters, I like F-14 the most, but I still think that at close range it has no chance with Mig-29. When it comes to records, how many times Russian 29s were fighting, US F-14? Give F-15 to, I don't know, iraq'i pilots... and send them to fight with russians pilots flying Mig-29. It's not just that simple. :)