Challenge to Every Honorable Lawyer in America

[ohwidow]

If you wish to do something about this, join at countygrandjurydotorg

[SeerTravisTruman]

Lawyers a just created reflections of their society. They are societal whores. One cannot expect any benevolent attitude, sanity, or rational integrity from them because they deal with a system that is malevolent, insane, and without rational integrity. See My website for more.

[GrapeXsoda]

you are a lawyer? how many mens did you remove out from the economy in the name of the best interest for the children?

[GrapeXsoda]

family law is good bussines ...specially when the client is rich .....the lawyers are the wich one that gets all the money....and they keep the game roling until money is gone.....the predatory misandry system is design to remove the men out the economy .....

[SakonnaSitak]

I am afraid I don't understand your post. Are you a lawyer ?

[IndictTheCorrupt]

Law Students have been the irresponsible of posters here. Abesnt rational comments, it is recommended other law students posting here avoid mentioning their limited knowledge by saying they are a 1L or 2L or even 3L, AND JUST STICK TO THE ISSUE as best as it can be dealt with with the general facts situation.

[IndictTheCorrupt]

"... Respondent's argument clearly demonstrates his failure to understand that the right to be heard is not limited to only being heard in person. The right is preserved by permitting a party to submit his or her position in writing."

[Extract from: Paragraph 72, Report of Referee].

DO YOU ACCEPT THIS AS THE LAW RELATED TO OUR RIGHT IN COURT CASES, to be heard only in writing if that is what the judge says.

[shinybluepope]

You barely provide any information for anyone to assess your qualm. Given, I am only a 2L. Still, I your statements saying that any 1L would find the court's statements without any basis in reality, should make my take on this is pertinent. By the way, I doubt I will respond if you send me piecemeal statements. I want as much of the case as possible.

[wtfiswrong80]

if you really want to flood the coffers of attorneys with money, then eliminate the ways that judges dismiss meritless cases. unfortunately, while the bar might be appreciative, the backlogged court system would be ineffective for those hat have real problems and their due process rights would be violated. if you look at it from that perspective, not only is it right to dismiss these cases but judges have a constitutional duty to do so. keep rockin' the penguin shirt though, i dig it.

[alphadork1]

There is a certain class of persons, among whom you appear to be one, who feel that every wrong visited upon them should be redressable in court, and if it is not, then the courts and the lawyers are corrupt. It's a psychopathology, as far as I am concerned. Regardless, I am a lawyer, and there is no question that -- as with any large group of persons -- there are corrupt and morally bankrupt attorneys and judges. There are also many noble and praiseworthy ones.

[squiresoft]

if you truly believe something's unjust, wouldnt that mean you're just a bad lawyer/lazy if you cant make justice a reality?

[Weaselski]

This is the weirdest thing I've ever seen. I think you might need some professional help.

[IndictTheCorrupt]

You hizup should be a judge. Otherwise you will be in bad shape in any type of argument.

Oh and I do leave stupid comments such as yours hizup untouched to show the level that mankind can sink and below which few would care to crawl.

[namdrut]

who is this hizup turd anyway?

[IndictTheCorrupt]

thepig is wrong for submitting is not a hearing, but thepig is a polite and logical fella.

Kyllina discredited himself with his language (and his misspellings) so his argument been ad hominem primary may be disregarded by all.

Kyllina should strategically retreat now before further damage to his reputation and credibility occurs.

[kyllina]

Re: Your message

I'm not about to any pro bono work for a pompous asshole like you. Get real. I will say that it will be a balancing test. Your rights will be predicated on the gravity of the harm to you by not being granted an open court hearing.

Hire a lawyer or get someone to take you on pro bono. In the the meantime, figure out how communicate without being a douchebag.

[kyllina]

Whatever your quest is, impuning lawyers as a class is not a good way to go about getting responses from them. But Im not a lawyer so what the heck. Im a second year law student and from what I can gather, you dont have a gripe. Whatever procedural due process guarantees the federal constitution gives to be heard can probably be satisfied by a written memo to the court. I think that's increasinly common place in fact, given the burden on the average docket these days.

[kyllina]

Oh, my rank is X and my serial number is pi.

[thepig]

Your lawyer is your agent. When he submits a motion on your behalf you are being heard. I assume you were suing some entity that defeated you on summaryu judgment because the court found that there was no genuine issue of material fact which might have allowed you to win your case. None of your constitutional rights have been violated if this is the case. I cannot say though because you don't give very much information. Good luck.

[IndictTheCorrupt]

You omitted whether or not you are a lawyer. I would speculate you are not. As I wrote you I will respond with the quoted passage and a bit more if this remains your answer.