And if Iran was attacked, you can count on a civil war in Iran, as there are many separatist/militant groups (Taliban, Kurds, BLA) in Iran that could gain power in the event there was an invasion and the results would be catastrophic if the there was a war.
Also there STILL is no evidence of a nuclear WEAPONS program in Iran, it's a nuclear POWER program according to everything inspected.
"absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."
That's like saying "There must be a ball in my empty hand because you can't prove there isn't one there"
Also, that's the same bullshit that got us into the Iraq war which did absolutely nothing beneficial for either Americans or the Iraqis.
I guarantee you the same thing will happen if we go to war in Iran, as there are many separatist groups (BLA, Kurds, Taliban) which could cause a civil war.
no, it's like saying that just because there is not a ball in your hand presently does not prove that you never had a ball in your hand. As I'm sure most people would agree, you have had several pairs of balls in your hand, and god only knows where else you put them.
sadly this regime will get more iranians killed with their antagonistic ways.
no iranian wants to die. but they kill us for protesting. no iranian wants to live like us... but we also don't want to be killed by this regime. finding ways to support our resistance is the only hope for all. these mullahs are crazy - god is on their side you know.
It is the Jews who control the US who create these wars. They trick corporate America into thinking it's about resources that they need, but it is all about Jewish selfishness. It is sad to think that WWI and II was all about Jewish selfishness.
i think you are unfortunately right. So far I'm disappointed with Iranians ability to realize, confront and stop this mad man and his puppet master dictator Khamenei.
All of a sudden people just act like nukes or nuclear technology, energy etc is safe.
I think Ahmadinejad is seriously putting the Iranian people at grave risk for something that will leave most Iranians with no more energy and a lot of debt...maybe even some nice nuclear waste and radiation.
The sooner Islam establishes the new Caliphate the better. The secular world will evaporate and Sharia law will be the order of the day. Allahu Akbar!!!
Or, it doesn't matter if Islam loses. The final conflagration will certainly bring the Mahdi and all the faithful will reside in Heaven, along with all the beautiful virgins and the soft rocks.
The only problem with that reasoning is - why do people have to fight over god? If god is THE one, why are people breaking all of the rules of god (so they say, but don't follow), in order to praise god? Sounds like BS to me...
You have to get nukes. Once you have them, it goes from the white man trying to stop you from getting them to the white man leaving you alone. Keep in mind, Russia nor the US has yet to engage in a nuclear war where BOTH sides have the weapons. Who has more to lose, rich countries with modern cities or poor countries with hardly any cities?
Goddamnit, GET ON WITH IT. Why are they are trying to build a case, they do what they like anyway- millions of people protested the wars, G20, G8, Socialized Medicine... Peaceful Protest achieves nothing... what are they waiting for?! Just get the fuck on with it and stop wasting everybody's time with lies and misinformation. It's ANNOYING. We all know the Government is full of murderers and greed-whores, criminals and psychopaths. Just GET ON WITH IT.
Yep IRAQ had WMDs we gave them to hussan when he was fighting IRAN LOL he used tons of them on his own people, WMDs yes people he gases his own people with WMDs this is fact and well documented IRAQ USED WMDs what they did with it all when the US went in there WHO knows I think OBAMA has them now
Why don't you mention how a french company was building it for them. Israel bombed the plant when the french employees and probably everyone who worked there was off. Where they in pursuit of a nuclear weapon? I don't know, i have to imagine if they were, France would not have had allowed it.
because its ruled by a fundamentalist theocracy and dictatorship which hangs homosexuals from street lights, stones 'whores' to death outside their houses, murders and suppresses political dissidents using the govt, denies the Holocaust and threatens to wipe Israel off the map.
Because it funds, trains and arms terrorist hexxbollah in lebanon and the region and would give suicidal religious radical fundamentalists nuclear weapons?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What's wrong with keeping gays under control? At least some country is wise enough to do it! The white man let's white countries have nukes, but wants to make sure non-whites don't have them so that they can invade them anytime. Countries with nukes get respect and the US does not consider invasion. I am sure the US through the Jews, will come up with a new excuse. The death of Mike Jakcson messed up the fake election riots started by the CIA. They will keep trying until war...
What's bigoted about what I wrote? Is it the gay line? With all of the more important sruff I wrote, all you come away with is the gay shit? Cocksucker!
it was your general ignorance actually. Yeah suggesting that its ok to hang homosexuals from traffic signs did contribute to me calling you a bigoted pos.
homosexuals and jews, what a tough guy you are. Gonna pick on the girl scouts next? pussy.
i assume you'd rather have the iranian govt taking their time and spending their money and man power burning ants with magnifying glasses.
If gays are so un-important then why devote so much resources to it, develop policy revolving around it, trying to cover it up and murdering your own citizens?
Don't you think they'd be better off spending that money, time and govt personel say..helping their citizens get education, food or medicine?
Hanging gays is not the priority, it is only your main concern. I get tired of the white man always trying ti impose his ways of life on people. If other don't like gays, why try and force them to? Gayness is a European way of life and a part of their culture. Iran is only a threat to Israel, not the US. Rememer, the US put the Shah in power and the Ayatollahs took over from there, they were always on the hit list...
'the white man always trying to impose his ways?'
oh God shut up already I'm African American.
Honestly, lets be real, prostitution in Arab countries is only illegal for women usually. Which means men end up paying other men for sexy time. I wouldn't call that a very western practice but thats just me.
Iran is a threat to the entire region and world and so is your ignorance and bigoted ways.
Who cares IF you are black? Iran is not an arab country, so that is out of the window. Iran is only a threat to the region because if they take any other country, it gains more power to threaten Israel. I would not mind Iran taking an arab country or two. These places need to be de-arabized anyway. If Israel were not in the region, the only concern would be oil.
it matters that I'm black when last comment you labeled me as the white man trying to impose his ways.
i found it pretty comical to say the least.
Iran is a threat to the region because it is an unstable suicidal fundamentalist theocratic dictatorship hell bent on some radical agenda.
You are very inconsistent. So now I'm not a white man trying to impose his ways and you don't care that homosexuality isn't something unique to the west and flourishes in the Arab and Muslim states?
Don't flatter yourself. I wrote: THE white man, not YOU as a white man... I find it comical that you would think that I hold YOU in such regard. Even if Iran is what you described, what gives any country the right to invade? China is like that, but of course no one is trying to start a war with them.
I don't there are issues with Iran.
But you are oversimplifying things.
And if Iran was attacked, you can count on a civil war in Iran, as there are many separatist/militant groups (Taliban, Kurds, BLA) in Iran that could gain power in the event there was an invasion and the results would be catastrophic if the there was a war.
Also there STILL is no evidence of a nuclear WEAPONS program in Iran, it's a nuclear POWER program according to everything inspected.
ua1001 2 years ago
HAS IRAN BUILT A NUK BOMB NO
end of story
HAS AMERIACA GOT NUKES YES
HAS AMERICA ENGAED IN WAR YES
SADDAM DEAD YES
WHY IS AMERICA STILL IN IRAQ OIL, MONEY
IS AMERCA SETTING DOUBLE STANDARD YES YES
HAS ISREAL GOT NUKES YES
BASED ON THIS SHOULD EVERYONE HAVE TO LEGIMATE RIGHT TO SELF DEFENCE???????????
KingKong1ooo 2 years ago 6
hmm, "absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."
Let isreal bomb those fucking rag heads off the map, as they have stated they wish to do to isreal. Then america can bomb iran's allies.
canisdormit 2 years ago
"absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."
That's like saying "There must be a ball in my empty hand because you can't prove there isn't one there"
Also, that's the same bullshit that got us into the Iraq war which did absolutely nothing beneficial for either Americans or the Iraqis.
I guarantee you the same thing will happen if we go to war in Iran, as there are many separatist groups (BLA, Kurds, Taliban) which could cause a civil war.
Do the world a favor and shut up.
ua1001 2 years ago
no, it's like saying that just because there is not a ball in your hand presently does not prove that you never had a ball in your hand. As I'm sure most people would agree, you have had several pairs of balls in your hand, and god only knows where else you put them.
canisdormit 2 years ago
sadly this regime will get more iranians killed with their antagonistic ways.
no iranian wants to die. but they kill us for protesting. no iranian wants to live like us... but we also don't want to be killed by this regime. finding ways to support our resistance is the only hope for all. these mullahs are crazy - god is on their side you know.
BasijiHunter 2 years ago 3
finally the truth.
draconusrex33 2 years ago 2
It is the Jews who control the US who create these wars. They trick corporate America into thinking it's about resources that they need, but it is all about Jewish selfishness. It is sad to think that WWI and II was all about Jewish selfishness.
n0gar 2 years ago
i think you are unfortunately right. So far I'm disappointed with Iranians ability to realize, confront and stop this mad man and his puppet master dictator Khamenei.
All of a sudden people just act like nukes or nuclear technology, energy etc is safe.
I think Ahmadinejad is seriously putting the Iranian people at grave risk for something that will leave most Iranians with no more energy and a lot of debt...maybe even some nice nuclear waste and radiation.
screw nuclear
daderone 2 years ago
The sooner Islam establishes the new Caliphate the better. The secular world will evaporate and Sharia law will be the order of the day. Allahu Akbar!!!
Or, it doesn't matter if Islam loses. The final conflagration will certainly bring the Mahdi and all the faithful will reside in Heaven, along with all the beautiful virgins and the soft rocks.
Either way, we are going for it.
NotEasilyRegimented 2 years ago
english please.
daderone 2 years ago
The only problem with that reasoning is - why do people have to fight over god? If god is THE one, why are people breaking all of the rules of god (so they say, but don't follow), in order to praise god? Sounds like BS to me...
n0gar 2 years ago
Alll people don't agree on ANYTHING.
Didn't you know that?
HeisenbergSleptHere 2 years ago
You have to get nukes. Once you have them, it goes from the white man trying to stop you from getting them to the white man leaving you alone. Keep in mind, Russia nor the US has yet to engage in a nuclear war where BOTH sides have the weapons. Who has more to lose, rich countries with modern cities or poor countries with hardly any cities?
n0gar 2 years ago
let s just go bomb them isnt that what this country does best!!
agentmusti 2 years ago 4
ya seriously like come on why are they making nuclear shit anyways there country is full of islamic radicals
Californianboy626 2 years ago
what a Californianboy would know about world politic? seriously...
alexanderman1354 2 years ago
wat a alexanderman no about english? srsly
Cobra666Commander 2 years ago
Lol, fake
xavier8368 2 years ago
good.
damM3 2 years ago
if israel can have nukes why can't Iran if the USSR made nukes first would America not have seeked them also
DemonicGemini 2 years ago
The US had the first nuclear bomb. Made during the Manhattan project. The USSR then made one shortly after WWII. Which then started the cold war.
ihavtugo 2 years ago
did you not read my comment IF the USSR made nukes first would America not have seeked them also
DemonicGemini 2 years ago
Sorry read it wrong.
ihavtugo 2 years ago
American made the first nuclear weapons, USSR made it after
EAH6106 2 years ago
please reread my comment and really read the IF
DemonicGemini 2 years ago
Most likely they probably would of, because it would proabably would have been seen as a threat to the USA and the world, and you know how the US is
EAH6106 2 years ago
america uses nuclear weapons and terrorism as justification to go to war.
carrano68 2 years ago 2
Iran is totally winning this chess game while Western world plays stupid.
Very pathetic.
glentubin 2 years ago 2
Goddamnit, GET ON WITH IT. Why are they are trying to build a case, they do what they like anyway- millions of people protested the wars, G20, G8, Socialized Medicine... Peaceful Protest achieves nothing... what are they waiting for?! Just get the fuck on with it and stop wasting everybody's time with lies and misinformation. It's ANNOYING. We all know the Government is full of murderers and greed-whores, criminals and psychopaths. Just GET ON WITH IT.
Kiddolinfen09 2 years ago 2
atak this country
lest go america take down this gouvernement
hdzsound 2 years ago
they already planned this soo called cooperation long before...something else is comming..
ELMOcall911 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK AP ZIONIST CONTROLLED MEDIA
Tobias8164 2 years ago
Contrary to popular belief. Iraq did in fact
have a nuclear program. The big 3 news will never tell you this. Israel bombed
the Osirak nuclear facility in 81 before it went online. Iraq did have a WMD program. Iran will cooperate now that
they have a bomb.
jblcva 2 years ago
u fucking moron...
so what ifthey did?
israel bombed it as u said and yes they did.
they wanted to bomb the pakistani nuclear facility to.. but got scared.
Pakistan will make israel a wastland if anything comes near pakistani nuke facilitys.
as someone here said.
if USA has nukes WHY NOT IRAN AND IRAQ.
saddam was no bigger criminals then u citizen of USA.
and lets not talk about BUSH CHENEY AND WOLFBITCH.. or 1000 other sitting in congress and white house.
Tobias8164 2 years ago 2
Yep IRAQ had WMDs we gave them to hussan when he was fighting IRAN LOL he used tons of them on his own people, WMDs yes people he gases his own people with WMDs this is fact and well documented IRAQ USED WMDs what they did with it all when the US went in there WHO knows I think OBAMA has them now
Docthewrench 2 years ago
Why don't you mention how a french company was building it for them. Israel bombed the plant when the french employees and probably everyone who worked there was off. Where they in pursuit of a nuclear weapon? I don't know, i have to imagine if they were, France would not have had allowed it.
shznithead 2 years ago
IF the U.S. has nukes,...why not IRAN???????
treid100182 2 years ago
Because they'll bomb the shit out of iraq? XD
Vilemk0 2 years ago
yeah that made sense.....
Juntahh 2 years ago
because its ruled by a fundamentalist theocracy and dictatorship which hangs homosexuals from street lights, stones 'whores' to death outside their houses, murders and suppresses political dissidents using the govt, denies the Holocaust and threatens to wipe Israel off the map.
Because it funds, trains and arms terrorist hexxbollah in lebanon and the region and would give suicidal religious radical fundamentalists nuclear weapons?
daderone 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What's wrong with keeping gays under control? At least some country is wise enough to do it! The white man let's white countries have nukes, but wants to make sure non-whites don't have them so that they can invade them anytime. Countries with nukes get respect and the US does not consider invasion. I am sure the US through the Jews, will come up with a new excuse. The death of Mike Jakcson messed up the fake election riots started by the CIA. They will keep trying until war...
n0gar 2 years ago
you sure are one ignorant and vile moron. thanks for your breif demonstration of bigoted trash.
daderone 2 years ago
What's bigoted about what I wrote? Is it the gay line? With all of the more important sruff I wrote, all you come away with is the gay shit? Cocksucker!
n0gar 2 years ago
it was your general ignorance actually. Yeah suggesting that its ok to hang homosexuals from traffic signs did contribute to me calling you a bigoted pos.
homosexuals and jews, what a tough guy you are. Gonna pick on the girl scouts next? pussy.
daderone 2 years ago
Like I wrote, there are more important things going on in the world instead of worrying about sick gays.
n0gar 2 years ago
i assume you'd rather have the iranian govt taking their time and spending their money and man power burning ants with magnifying glasses.
If gays are so un-important then why devote so much resources to it, develop policy revolving around it, trying to cover it up and murdering your own citizens?
Don't you think they'd be better off spending that money, time and govt personel say..helping their citizens get education, food or medicine?
Maybe a/c is more important then hanging gays?
daderone 2 years ago
Hanging gays is not the priority, it is only your main concern. I get tired of the white man always trying ti impose his ways of life on people. If other don't like gays, why try and force them to? Gayness is a European way of life and a part of their culture. Iran is only a threat to Israel, not the US. Rememer, the US put the Shah in power and the Ayatollahs took over from there, they were always on the hit list...
n0gar 2 years ago
'the white man always trying to impose his ways?'
oh God shut up already I'm African American.
Honestly, lets be real, prostitution in Arab countries is only illegal for women usually. Which means men end up paying other men for sexy time. I wouldn't call that a very western practice but thats just me.
Iran is a threat to the entire region and world and so is your ignorance and bigoted ways.
daderone 2 years ago
Who cares IF you are black? Iran is not an arab country, so that is out of the window. Iran is only a threat to the region because if they take any other country, it gains more power to threaten Israel. I would not mind Iran taking an arab country or two. These places need to be de-arabized anyway. If Israel were not in the region, the only concern would be oil.
n0gar 2 years ago
it matters that I'm black when last comment you labeled me as the white man trying to impose his ways.
i found it pretty comical to say the least.
Iran is a threat to the region because it is an unstable suicidal fundamentalist theocratic dictatorship hell bent on some radical agenda.
You are very inconsistent. So now I'm not a white man trying to impose his ways and you don't care that homosexuality isn't something unique to the west and flourishes in the Arab and Muslim states?
daderone 2 years ago
Don't flatter yourself. I wrote: THE white man, not YOU as a white man... I find it comical that you would think that I hold YOU in such regard. Even if Iran is what you described, what gives any country the right to invade? China is like that, but of course no one is trying to start a war with them.
n0gar 2 years ago
are you really that dense?
I'm gonna ask you to do something for me. I hope you do or try.
I want you to look up at the title of the video.
I want you to watch the video, and then I want you to think long and hard about why I'm not here talking about China, Yugoslavia, Congo or Nicaragua.
Did u figure it out? Its because this is a video about Iran.
You with me so far?
I hope so. Realize that the only thing I have to say to China @ this venture is to stop funding Iran.
daderone 2 years ago
they have just as many weapons of mass destruction as Iraq did
Fermions83 2 years ago
puta
piffbrian95 2 years ago